Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Maternal Mortality
- Safe Motherhood Initiative In 2002 the Safe Motherhood Initiative was launched as a joint venture between NYS Dept of Health and ACOG District II. The goals of the program :
1. - Overall decrease in maternal mortality: 2. - Eliminates the disparity between white and black women
Maternal Mortality
- Safe Motherhood Initiative Reporting Maternal Deaths through the S.M.I. was on a voluntary basis from 8/03 through 6/05 there were 37 Maternal Deaths reported to ACOG District II through the S.M.I.
Maternal Mortality
- Safe Motherhood Initiative Most common causes of M.M.
Embolism PIH Hemorrhage Infectious Cardiac 24% 24% 15% 15% 6%
Maternal Mortality
- Safe Motherhood Initiative 1.- Hemorrhage Protocol 2.- Preconceptional counselling 3.- Management of Sepsis and septic shock 4.- Obesity 5.- Critical Care in Obstetrics
Septic Shock
- Case presentation Mrs X , 36y old P2 at 34wks C/O - Fever, nausea, vomiting 2-3d
- Other fam members same symptoms V.S. -Temp 104, BP 97/57, Pulse 150, R.R. 22 P.E. - Non-focal: Lungs clear, Abd non-tender Labs - WBC 8,000 Hct 33%, Hb 11g
Fever etiology ?? - Hydration, Temp, EFM
- Sepsis workup
Septic Shock
- Case presentation Hospital Course
Initial FHR:
- Bseline 200bpm,
2hrs after Adm:
variability, no decels
- FHR Decelerations
430 hrs after Adm:
Septic Shock
- Case presentation -
Adhesion molecules
Septic Shock
-Case presentation
Septic Shock
- Case presentation Delivery 401 A.M. (EBL=800cc) To R.R. 430 A.M.
4:45A.M. Temp 98.9o F 5:00A.M. BP 80/40 7:00A.M. Ephedrine BP 100/55 O2 Rpt Sat 95% HCO3=18 pCO2=41 6:45A.M. O2 Sat 85%, -75% pH=7.27 pO2=47 7:30A.M. Temp 99.5o F,
Septic Shock
- Case presentation Delivery 401 A.M. (EBL=800cc) To R.R. 430 A.M.
Urinary Output 5A.M. 50cc 6A.M. 50cc 7A.M. 45cc 8A.M. 25cc 9A.M. 25cc 10A.M. 20cc 11A.M. 10cc 12P.M. 30cc 1P.M. 60cc
Fluids
Septic Shock
- Case presentation Pregnancy Post surgery Ac resp distress
Septic Shock
- Case presentation CT Bil Infiltrates Rpt WBC 15,000 Fever 1010 F O2 desaturation Low BPs
ICU
Septic Shock
- Case presentation Day 1-7
No improvement Pulmonary Status Levophed Maintain BPs Blood Culture Strep Pneumonia Rx Imipenem, Gentamycin Xigris (APC) started
Day 8-9
Septic Shock
- Case presentation 2nd Septic Source
CxR No empyema No other studies done (Pat unstable) #9 Explor laparotomy Temps WBCs 98-100 F 17,000 TAH* in ICU
Death
Septic Shock
- Case presentation Mrs X , 36y old P2 at 34wks -Delay in Dg -Delay in initiation of antibiotic therapy -Delay in initiation of hemodynamic monitoring - Delay in initiation of aggressive fluid management 2A.M.
5 P.M.
Septic Shock
Consensus conference of American College of Chest Physicians and Society of Critical Care Medicine on Sepsis and related disorders 1992
- Systemic inflamatory response syndrome - Sepsis - Severe Sepsis - Septic Shock - Multiple Organ Dysfunction Syndrome
Septic Shock
SIRS*
Definition Diagnosis The organisms response to any insult
- Infectious, Trauma, Toxic
Septic Shock
Bacteremia SIRS Sepsis Severe sepsis Septic Shock
Presence of bacteria in the blood Systemic Inflamatory Response Syndrome Documented infection + Evidence of SIRS Sepsis associated with organ dysfunction (MODS) Sepsis induced hypotension despite adequate hydration
Septic Shock
1.- Individual entities ? 2.- Do they develop sequentially ? 3.- Risk of specific end-organ failure ? 4.- Mortality Rates ?
Increasingly severe responses to same insult Progression after hospitalization ? ARDS, DIC, ARF
Septic Shock
A large study of 2,527 patients that met at least 2 criteria for SIRS and were followed for 28d in the hospital or until discharge/death.
Rangel-Fausto et al JAMA-1995
Septic Shock
Final Diagnosis
SIRS Sepsis Severe Sepsis Septic Shock 1301 (52%) 649 (26%) 467 (18%) 110 (4%)
Rangel-Fausto et al JAMA-1995
Septic Shock
Final Dg Present on Admission 56% 42% 29% Progressed in Hospital 44% 58% 71%
Rangel-Fausto et al JAMA-1995
Septic Shock
SIRS Advance to higher level 32% 36% 45% Advance to Septic Shock 11% 21% 27%
Rangel-Fausto et al JAMA-1995
Septic Shock
Blood Cultures
Sepsis Severe Sepsis Septic Shock 16% 25% 69%
Rangel-Fausto et al JAMA-1995
Septic Shock
Dg SIRS-2 SIRS-3 SIRS-4 Sepsis Severe Sepsis Septic Shock ARDS 2% 3% 6% 6% 8% 18% DIC 8% 15% 19% 16% 18% 38% ARF 9% 13% 19% 19% 23% 31%
Rangel-Fausto et al JAMA-1995
Septic Shock
Septic Shock
Conclusions SIRS and related conditions represent a hierarchical continuum of increased inflammatory response to infection End organ failure rates blood culture rates and mortality rates are all increased with each subsequent stage of systemic inflamatory response.
Rangel-Fausto et al JAMA-1995
Septic Shock
Diagnosis
Pathophysiology
- Clinical presentation - Lab workup
Treatment
Septic Shock
- Pathophysiology Infection Bacteremia Release of toxins Complex inflammatory response Multiple Organ Dysfunction Death
Septic Shock
- Pathophysiology Coagulation system Endothelium Cell metabolism Lungs Kidney Cardio-vascular
Septic Shock
-Coagulation
Procoagulants Anticoagulants
Septic Shock
- Coagulation Activated Protein C
- Inhibits Factor VIII-a, V-a TF expression Leukocytes adhesion TNF levels Septic Shock - Inhibits PAI 1
Mortality Rates
Septic Shock
- Coagulation Bacterial Toxins Bacterial Toxins
Anticoagulants
Procoagulants
- Expression of TF - Edothelial damage - Platelet agregation - levelTF Inhibitor - level ofAT - level of Prot C - Prot C to APC - Fibrinolysis
Microvascular thrombosis
Septic Shock
- Cellular metabolism Sepsis
-Hypoxemia - Hypotension -Microvascular abn Tissue hypoxia
Septic Shock
- Cellular metabolism Acidosis ( pH < 7.35 ) Respiratory
pCO2 > 45mmHg HCO3 22-26 mEq/L
Anion Gap
Metabolic
HCO3 < 22mEq/L
Anion Gap
-Renal ac
Septic Shock
- Endothelial Cell Endothelial cell
- Prevent coagulation - Prevent migration of cells - Regulate vasopermeability - Regulate microcirculation
Septic Shock
- Endothelial Cell Sepsis
Endothelial cells Adhesion molecules Complement activation TF, PAF Leakage
Permeability Coagulation
Edema
Microvascular thrombosis
Cell death
Septic Shock
- ARDS Endothelial cell injury
Capillary permeability Alveolar flooding Lung compliance Shunting Hypoxemia
Recovery
Death
Septic Shock
- ARDS -
Septic Shock
- Cardio-vascular Sepsis
Myocardial Depression Refractory Vasodilation
Capillary permeability
Hypotension
Septic Shock
- Diagnosis Coagulation -D.I.C. - Thrombosis Pulmonary - Hypoxemia - CxR changes -Ac renal failure
Tissue - Metabolic ac. metabolism (Anion gap) - Lactic acid Cardio vascular -Decreased E.F. -Hypotension
Septic Shock
- Diagnosis Fever - Common symptom - Viral syndrome - Non infectious - Pregnancy - Steroids (FLM) - Labor Pulse - Anxiety - Pain -Regional anesthesia -Supine hypotension
BP WBCs
Septic Shock
- Diagnosis Coagulation Tissue metabolism Cardio-vascular Pulmonary Renal Liver C.N.S. -Fibrinogen, FSP, PT, PTT, INR, Plts - pH, HCO3 BD, Anion gap, Lactate -Low BP (Refractory), PCWP, EF - O2 Sat, CxR - Urinary Output, BUN, CR, Lytes
Septic Shock
- Diagnosis Fever Abn WBCs BP, Pulse R.R.
Septic Shock
- Management -
Patients seen in the E.R. with the Dg of septic shock were randomly allocated to 1.- Standard therapy (n=133) 2.- Early goal-directed therapy (n=130)
Septic Shock
- Management Early goal directed therapy is a complex approach to septic shock involving manipulation of cardiac preload afterload and contractility to achieve a balance between O2 delivery and O2 demand. End points used to confirm that balance
Septic Shock
- Management Controls Study
A-lines, CVP placed Management of fluids, drugs up to MDs A-line, CVP placed Fluids 500cc q 30min CVP = 8-12mmHg If MAP < 65mmHg Vasopressors If CV O2 Sat < 70% Blood Hct > 30% If CV O2 Sat still < 70% Dobutamine
During the 1st 6hrs
Rivers et al NEJM 2001
Septic Shock
- Management Therapy
Fluids-Control Fluids-Study Blood-Control Blood-Study Dobutamine-Control Dobutamine-Study
*p<
0-6hrs
3,499ml 4,981ml* 18% 64%* 1% 14%*
0-72hrs
13,300ml 13,400mlns 44% 68%* 9% 15%ns
0.01
Septic Shock
- Management End-Point
CVP-C CVP-S MAP-C MAP-S Lactate-C Lactate-S Base Deficit-C Base deficit-S
C Control, S Study *p< 0.01
Baseline
6.1 5.3ns 76 74ns 6.9 7.7ns 8.9 8.9ns
0-6hrs
11.8 13.8* 81 95* 4.9 4.3* 8.0 4.7*
7-72hrs
11.6 11.9ns 80 87* 3.9 3.0* 5.1 2.0*
Septic Shock
- Management End-Point
PT-C PT-S PTT-C PTT-S FSP-C FSP-S MODS-C MODS-S
C Control, S Study *p< 0.01
Baseline
16.5 15.8ns 32.9 33.3ns 39 44ns 7.3 7.6ns
0-6hrs
17.5 16.0* 37.6 32.6* 54.9 45.8ns 6.8 5.9*
7-72hrs
17.3 15.4ns 37.0 34.6* 62.0 39.2* 6.4 5.1*
Septic Shock
- Management Mortality
All inpatients 28 day 60 Day
Controls
(n=133)
Study
(n=130)
*p<
0.01
Septic Shock
- Management -
Objective
To determine the impact of delays in initiating adequate antibiotic therapy on mortality rates of patients in septic shock
Septic Shock
- Management -
Methods
A retrospective cohort study including 14 ICUs in the USA and Canada. A total of 2,731 adult patients with documented septic shock were included.
Septic Shock
- Management -
Methods
A. The primary outcome variable was survival to hospital discharge. B. The primary independent variable was the time to initiation of effective antimicrobial therapy relative to the first occurrence of shock (persistent hypotension)
Kumar et al Crit Care Med, 2006
Septic Shock
- Management -
Outcome
A. Mortality for the entire population B. Survival was similar: - Infection documented or suspecetd
56%
Septic Shock
- Management -
Antibiotics Rx
(from onset of shock)
Mortality Rates
82%
< 1hr
At 6hrs
Septic Shock
- Management -
Antibiotics Rx
(from onset of shock)
Mortality Rates
82%
< 1hr
Each hour of delay was associated with a in survival of 7.6%
At 6hrs
Septic Shock
- Management -
Antibiotic Rx and Intensive therapy (goal directed therapy ) started at the earliest stages of severe sepsis/septic shock