001 R0 STK Substructure Design AMH To Be Sent

3.2.
1 Input Data for Design of EJ Pier P3

EJ
FRL
9.309
0.065 thick WC
Left Span
Right Span
PSC
PSC
1.150
superstructure
1.150
superstructure
RL of Pier cap top
0.350
7.744
=9.309-0.065-1.150-0.350
0.750
0.750
1.300
2.300
4.612
HFL
7.350
1.800
dia circular pier
Existing GL
3.312
1.632
RL of foundation
base
3.132
RL of pile cap
base
1.500
Foundation
1.632
4.3
Longitudinal Elevation at EJ Pier
9.8
All dimensions &

levels are in m
unless otherwise
specified
THE SECTION SHOWN IN

ELEVATION AND CROSS
SECTION ARE ONLY INDICATIVE
2.300
0.15
1.800
dia circular pier
Foundation
4.3
Sectional Elevation
Existing bridge is on this side
Y
Pier
BL1
BR1 Deck Slab
BL2
BR2
BL3
BR3
Pier CG
X , Traffic
BL4
BR4
BL5
BR5
BL6
BR6
Crash barrier
Plan of deck and piercap

3.2.1.1
Details of Superstructure
Left Span
Right Span
Span
22.25
22.25
Type
PSC Girder
PSC Girder
Overall Depth
1.150
1.150
CG from bottom
0.615
0.615
1.00E+06
1.00E+06
Radius of Horizontal Curvature
Max height of bearing + pedestal

0.350
0.350
(refer superstructure design note for CG location, out of various values, maximum value has
been considered to have maximum lever arm for horizontal forces. )
C.L of Pier/ C.L of deck

Origin
0
-4.5
4.5
-2.5
3.5
-0.5 1.5
The co-ordinate of each girder with respect to the center of pier and deck.
3.2.1.2
Reactions due to DL
Bearing Vertical
Trans
Longitu
Trans
Longitu
marked Reaction
Eccen
Eccen Moment Moment
BL1
180
4.5
-0.750
810.0
-135.0
BL2
214
3.5
-0.750
749.0
-160.5
BL3
240
1.5
-0.750
360.0
-180.0
Left
BL4
240
-0.5
-0.750
-120.0
-180.0
span
BL5
240
-2.5
-0.750
-600.0
-180.0
BL6
237
-4.5
-0.750 -1066.5
-177.8
Total
1351
BR1
180
4.5
0.750
810
135.0
BR2
214
3.5
0.750
749
160.5
Right
BR3
240
1.5
0.750
360
180.0
span
BR4
240
-0.5
0.750
-120
180.0
BR5
240
-2.5
0.750
-600
180.0
BR6
237
-4.5
0.750 -1066.5
177.8
Total
1351
132.5
1013.3
2702
265
Total=Left+Right
3.2.1.3
Reactions due to SIDL + Diaphragm

Due to Weight of Wearing Coat + Due to Weight of Crash Barrier & other services
Bearing Vertical
Trans
Longitu
marked Reaction
Eccen
Eccen Moment Moment
Trans
Longitu
BL1
13.5
4.5
-0.75
60.8
-10.1
BL2
31.3
3.5
-0.75
109.7
-23.5
BL3
41.5
1.5
-0.75
62.2
-31.1
Left
BL4
56.9
-0.5
-0.75
-28.5
-42.7
span
BL5
85.4
-2.5
-0.75
-213.5
-64.0
BL6
281.2
-4.5
-0.75 -1265.3
-210.9
Total
509.8
-1274.6
-382.3
BR1
13.5
4.5
0.75
60.8
10.1
BR2
31.3
3.5
0.75
109.7
23.5
BR3
41.5
1.5
0.75
62.2
31.1
Right
BR4
56.9
-0.5
0.75
-28.5
42.7
span
BR5
85.4
-2.5
0.75
-213.5
64.0
BR6
281.2
-4.5
0.75 -1265.3
210.9
Total
509.8
-1274.6
382.3
1020
-2549
Total=Left+Right
3.2.1.4
132.5 -1013.3
Reactions due to LL
As per Table 2 of IRC: 6 -2010, the superstructure has 2 lanes for movement of live loads
for the given width of carriageway. Following three cased of live loads has been considered
for the design of substructure
A
Maximum Reaction & Transverse moment case
Both spans loaded fully with live loads with maximum eccentricity (i.e. LL placed
nearest to edge) such that both the vertical reaction and transverse moment at the
B
EJ pier is maximum.
Maximum Longitudinal Moment case
Only one span loaded with live load fully such that the longitudinal moment at the
EJ pier is maximum
For each of the above cases, following live loads locations along the transverse direction has
been considered.
Case 1- Class 70R(Wheeled) - 1 lane placed at edge on the inner side of carriageway
5.150
e
Origin
1000kN
0.965
Inner edge
Transverse Eccentricity 'e'
5.150-0.965
4.185 m
Case 2- Class 70R(Wheeled) -2L (one at inner edge and the other at outer edge)
5.150
Origin
1000kN
0.965
1000kN
3.095
Distance of CL of pier from edge 5.150

= m
Distance of Resultant from edge
=
=(10000.965+1000(10.3-3.095))/(1000+1000)
=
4.085
-1.065 m
Case 3- Class 70R(Tracked) - 1 lane placed at edge on the inner side of carriageway
5.150
e
Origin
700kN
1.025
Inner edge
5.150-1.025
4.125 m
Case 4- Class 70R(tracked) -2L (one at inner edge and the other at outer edge)
5.150
Origin
700kN
0.965
700kN
3.155
Distance of CL of pier from edge 5.150

= m
=
=(7000.965+700(10.3-3.155))/(700+700)
=
4.055
-1.095 m
Case 5- Class A - 1 lane placed at edge on the inner side of carriageway

5.150
e
Origin
554kN
1.800
Inner edge

=
5.150-1.800
3.350 m
Case 6- Class A - 2 lanes placed at edge on the inner side of carriageway
5.150
Origin
554kN
0.9
3.5
554kN
554kN
e
Distance of CL of pier from edge
5.150 m
(5540.900+554(0.900+3.500))/(554+554)
2.650 m

=
2.500 m
=5.150-2.650
Case 7- Class A - 3 lanes placed at edge on the inner side of carriageway
5.150
Origin
554kN
554kN
0.9
554kN
3.5
1.8
e
5.150 m
(5540.9+(554(0.9+3.5))+(554(10.3-1.8)))/(3554)
4.600 m
0.550 m
=5.150-4.600
Case 8- 70R Tracked + Class A - 1 lane

Origin
5.150
554kN
1000kN
1.025
1.8
e
5.150 m
=(7001.025+554(10.3-1.8))/(700+554)
4.327 m

=
0.823 m
Case 9- 70R Wheeled + Class A - 1 lane
=5.150-4.327
Origin
5.150
1000kN
554kN
0.965
1.8
e
5.150 m
=(10000.965+(554(10.3-1.8)))/(1000+554)
3.651 m
1.499 m
=5.150-3.651
3.2.1.4.1 Maximum Reaction & Transverse moment case

For this case, a grillage beam model for both spans with live loads moving along the beam has
been analyzed using StaadPro software to get the maximum combined reaction on the EJ pier.
Results are tabulated below. Transverse eccentricity of the applied load at each bearing is
taken that has been used to calculate the transverse moment on the pier.
ACase 1- Class 70R(Wheeled) - 1 lane placed at edge on the inner side of carriageway
Left
Bearing Vertical
Trans
Longitu
marked Reaction
Eccen
Eccen Moment Moment
Trans
Longitu
BL1
195.8
4.5
-0.75
881.2
-146.9
BL2
82.5
3.5
-0.75
288.8
-61.9
BL3
46.4
1.5
-0.75
69.6
-34.8
BL4
-9.5
-0.5
-0.75
4.8
7.1
span
BL5
2.3
-2.5
-0.75
-4.5
-0.75
BL6
-3.4
Total
314
BR1
294.4
BR2
190.6
BR3
Right
span
-5.7
-1.7
15.4
2.6
1254.0
-235.6
4.5
0.75 1324.77
220.8
3.5
0.75
667.21
143.0
92.7
1.5
0.75
139.10
69.5
BR4
-3.1
-0.5
0.75
1.56
-2.3
BR5
-2.4
-2.5
0.75
6.12
-1.8
BR6
-6.7
-4.5
0.75
30.09
-5.0
Total
566
2168.8
424.13
880
3423
189
Total=Left+Right
ACase 2- Class 70R(Wheeled) -2L (one at inner edge and the other at outer edge)
Bearing Vertical
Trans
Longitu
Trans
Longitu
marked Reaction
Eccen
Eccen Moment Moment
BL1
-2.9
4.5
-0.75
-13.0
2.2
BL2
3.4
3.5
-0.75
11.9
-2.6
BL3
-11.9
1.5
-0.75
-17.9
8.9
left
BL4
84.2
-0.5
-0.75
-42.1
-63.1
span
BL5
193.8
-2.5
-0.75
-484.6
-145.4
BL6
54.7
-4.5
-0.75
-246.0
-41.0
Total
321
-792
-241
BR1
-9.3
4.5
0.75
-41.9
-7.0
BR2
3.7
3.5
0.75
12.9
2.8
BR3
13.4
1.5
0.75
20.1
10.0
right
BR4
151.2
-0.5
0.75
-75.6
113.4
span
BR5
299.9
-2.5
0.75
-749.6
224.9
BR6
99.5
-4.5
0.75
-447.9
74.6
Total
558
-1282
419
880
-2074
178
Total=Left+Right
Total effect of two lanes of 70R.

Total (70R+70R)L =
635
462
-477
Total (70R+70R)R =
1124
887
843
A Case3 Class A - 1 lane placed at edge on the outer side of carriageway

Bearing Vertical
Trans
Longitu
marked Reaction
Eccen
Eccen Moment Moment
BL1
141.0
4.500
-0.75
Trans
634.7
Longitu
-105.8
BL2
173.4
3.500
-0.75
607.0
-130.1
BL3
left
BL4
164.6
1.500
-0.75
246.9
-123.5
122.5
-0.500
-0.75
-61.2
-91.8
span
BL5
44.9
-2.500
-0.75
-112.3
-33.7
-4.500
-0.75
BL6
-6.4
Total
640
28.6
4.8
1343.6
-480.1
BR1
-17.6
4.500
BR2
-91.3
3.500
0.75
-79.1
-13.2
0.75
-319.6
-68.5
BR3
-38.8
1.500
0.75
-58.2
-29.1
right
BR4
-24.9
-0.500
0.75
12.5
-18.7
span
BR5
-30.2
-2.500
0.75
75.5
-22.6
BR6
1.8
-4.500
0.75
-7.9
1.3
Total
-201.0
-376.9
-150.8
439
967
-631
Total=Left+Right
A Case4 Class A - 2 lane

Bearing Vertical
Trans
Longitu
Trans
Longitu
marked Reaction
Eccen
Eccen Moment Moment
BL1
282.1
4.500
-0.75
1269.4
-211.6
BL2
346.9
3.500
-0.75
1214.0
-260.2
BL3
329.2
1.500
-0.75
493.8
-246.9
left
BL4
244.9
-0.500
-0.75
-122.5
-183.7
span
BL5
89.9
-2.500
-0.75
-224.7
-67.4
BL6
-12.7
-4.500
-0.75
57.2
9.5
Total
1280
2687.3
-960.2
BR1
-35.2
4.500
0.75
-158.3
-26.4
BR2
-182.6
3.500
0.75
-639.2
-137.0
BR3
-77.5
1.500
0.75
-116.3
-58.2
right
BR4
-49.9
-0.500
0.75
24.9
-37.4
span
BR5
-60.4
-2.500
0.75
150.9
-45.3
BR6
3.5
-4.500
0.75
-15.8
2.6
Total
-402.1
-753.7
-301.6
Total=Left+Right
878
A Case5- Class A - 3 lane
1934
-1262
Bearing Vertical
Trans
Longitu
Trans
Longitu
marked Reaction
Eccen
Eccen Moment Moment
BL1
268.7
4.500
-0.75
1209.1
-201.5
BL2
339.2
3.500
-0.75
1187.0
-254.4
BL3
355.2
1.500
-0.75
532.9
-266.4
left
BL4
361.5
-0.500
-0.75
-180.7
-271.1
span
BL5
378.0
-2.500
-0.75
-945.0
-283.5
BL6
167.6
-4.500
-0.75
-754.2
-125.7
Total
1870
BR1
-29.1
4.500
0.75
-130.9
-21.8
BR2
-175.1
3.500
0.75
-612.8
-131.3
BR3
-97.0
1.500
0.75
-145.5
-72.7
right
BR4
-118.4
-0.500
0.75
59.2
-88.8
span
BR5
-113.1
-2.500
0.75
282.7
-84.8
BR6
-20.3
-4.500
0.75
91.3
-15.2
Total
-552.9
-456.0
-414.7
1317
593
-1817
Total=Left+Right
1049.1 -1402.6
A Case6- Class 70R(Tracked) - 1 lane placed at edge on the inner side of carriageway
Bearing Vertical
Trans
Longitu
marked Reaction
Eccen
Eccen Moment Moment
Trans
Longitu
BL1
208.7
4.500
-0.75
939.3
-156.6
BL2
88.8
3.500
-0.75
310.7
-66.6
BL3
72.4
1.500
-0.75
108.7
-54.3
Left
BL4
-15.2
-0.500
-0.75
7.6
11.4
span
BL5
3.4
-2.500
-0.75
-8.6
-2.6
-4.500
-0.75
BL6
-1.2
Total
357
5.6
0.9
1363.3
-267.7
BR1
194.6
4.500
BR2
79.7
3.500
0.75
875.75
146.0
0.75
278.81
59.7
BR3
67.4
1.500
0.75
101.12
50.6
Right
BR4
span
BR5
-14.6
-0.500
0.75
7.31
-11.0
3.5
-2.500
0.75
-8.65
2.6
BR6
-1.2
-4.500
0.75
5.18
-0.9
Total
329
1259.5
247.03
686
2623
-21
Total=Left+Right
A Case7- Class 70R(Tracked) -2L (one at inner edge and the other at outer edge)
Bearing Vertical
Trans
Longitu
Trans
Longitu
marked Reaction
Eccen
Eccen Moment Moment
BL1
-2.3
4.500
-0.75
-10.4
1.7
BL2
4.9
3.500
-0.75
17.0
-3.6
BL3
-13.4
1.500
-0.75
-20.1
10.1
left
BL4
105.7
-0.500
-0.75
-52.9
-79.3
span
BL5
214.5
-2.500
-0.75
-536.2
-160.9
BL6
47.3
-4.500
-0.75
-212.6
-35.4
Total
357
-815
-267
BR1
-2.1
4.500
0.75
-9.5
-1.6
BR2
4.8
3.500
0.75
16.7
3.6
BR3
-13.4
1.500
0.75
-20.1
-10.0
right
BR4
97.6
-0.500
0.75
-48.8
73.2
span
BR5
198.9
-2.500
0.75
-497.2
149.2
BR6
44.1
-4.500
0.75
-198.4
33.1
Total
330
-757
247
686
-1572
-20
714
548
-535
Total (70R+70R)R = 659
502
494
Total=Left+Right

Total (70R+70R)L =
A Case8- Class 70R(Tracked)+ Class A - 1L

Total effect
(70RT+Cl A) 1L=
997
2707
-748
(70RT+Cl A) 1L=
128
883
96
A Case9- Class 70R(Wheeled)+ Class A - 1L

Total effect
(70RW+Cl A) 1L=
455
2598
-716
(70RW+Cl A) 1L=
364
1792
273
3.2.1.4.2 Maximum Longitudinal Moment case

For this case, grillage model of span with live loads moving along a specified path with
eccentricities has been analyzed using StaadPro software to get the maximum combined
reaction on the set of bearings supporting the above span to maximize longitudinal moment on
the EJ pier. The other span is not loaded at all so that bearing reactions for that span are all
zero. Results are tabulated below.
Right Span
Left Span
BCase 1-Class 70R(Wheeled) - 1 lane placed at edge on the inner side of carriageway
Bearing Vertical
Trans
Longitu
Trans
Longitu
marked Reaction
Eccen
Eccen Moment Moment
BL1
4.5
-0.75
BL2
3.5
-0.75
BL3
1.5
-0.75
BL4
-0.5
-0.75
BL5
-2.5
-0.75
BL6
-4.5
-0.75
Total
0.00
BR1
422.6
4.5
0.75
1901.6
316.9
BR2
252.9
3.5
0.75
885.1
189.7
BR3
127.6
1.5
0.75
191.4
95.7
BR4
-1.4
-0.5
0.75
0.7
-1.0
BR5
-2.6
-2.5
0.75
6.5
-2.0
BR6
-14.6
-4.5
0.75
65.9
-11.0
Total
784.4
3051.2
588.3
784
3051
588
Total=Left+Right
Right Span
Left Span
BCase 2-Class 70R(Wheeled) -2L (one at inner edge and the other at outer edge)
Bearing Vertical
Trans
Longitu
Trans
Longitu
marked Reaction
Eccen
Eccen Moment Moment
BL1
4.5
-0.75
BL2
3.5
-0.75
BL3
1.5
-0.75
BL4
-0.5
-0.75
BL5
-2.5
-0.75
-4.5
-0.75
BL6
Total
BR1
-16.6
4.5
0.75
-74.5
-12.4
BR2
7.5
3.5
0.75
26.1
5.6
BR3
21.2
1.5
0.75
31.9
15.9
BR4
209.3
-0.5
0.75
-104.7
157.0
BR5
403.0
-2.5
0.75 -1007.5
302.2
BR6
159.9
-4.5
0.75
-719.7
120.0
Total
784.4
-1848.4
588.3
784
-1848
588
Total = Left + Right

Total (70R+70R)L =
Total (70R+70R)R =
1569
1203
1177
Right Span
Left Span
BCase 3-Class A - 1 lanes placed at edge on the inner side of carriageway

Bearing Vertical
Trans
Longitu
Trans
Longitu
marked Reaction
Eccen
Eccen Moment Moment
BL1
4.5
-0.75
BL2
3.5
-0.75
BL3
1.5
-0.75
BL4
-0.5
-0.75
BL5
-2.5
-0.75
BL6
-4.5
-0.75
Total
BR1
-6.6
4.5
-0.75
-29.7
5.0
BR2
0.2
3.5
-0.75
0.5
-0.1
BR3
7.0
1.5
-0.75
10.5
-5.3
BR4
38.5
-0.5
-0.75
-19.2
-28.9
BR5
205.5
-2.5
-0.75
-513.9
-154.2
BR6
134.6
-4.5
-0.75
-605.7
-100.9
Total
379.2
-1157.4
-284.4
379
-1157
-284
Right Span
Left Span

Bearing Vertical
Trans
Longitu
marked Reaction
Eccen
Eccen Moment Moment
Trans
Longitu
BL1
4.5
-0.75
BL2
3.5
-0.75
BL3
1.5
-0.75
BL4
-0.5
-0.75
BL5
-2.5
-0.75
BL6
-4.5
-0.75
Total
BR1
165.4
4.5
0.75
744.3
124.1
BR2
136.1
3.5
0.75
476.4
102.1
BR3
166.7
1.5
0.75
250.0
125.0
BR4
125.9
-0.5
0.75
-63.0
94.4
BR5
36.2
-2.5
0.75
-90.6
27.2
Right Span
BR6
-10.5
Total
-4.5
0.75
47.1
-7.8
619.9
1364.3
464.9
620
1364
465
Right Span
Left Span

Bearing Vertical
Trans
Longitu
Trans
Longitu
marked Reaction
Eccen
Eccen Moment Moment
BL1
0.0
4.5
0.75
BL2
0.0
3.5
0.75
BL3
0.0
1.5
0.75
BL4
0.0
-0.5
0.75
BL5
0.0
-2.5
0.75
BL6
0.0
-4.5
0.75
Total
BR1
156.0
4.5
0.75
701.9
117.0
BR2
135.7
3.5
0.75
474.9
101.8
BR3
179.1
1.5
0.75
268.7
134.3
BR4
172.0
-0.5
0.75
-86.0
129.0
BR5
175.1
-2.5
0.75
-437.7
131.3
BR6
111.9
-4.5
0.75
-503.5
83.9
Total
929.8
418.3
697.3
930
418
697
Right Span
Left Span
BCase 6-Class 70R(Tracked) - 1 lane placed at edge on the inner side of carriageway
Bearing Vertical
Trans
Longitu
marked Reaction
Eccen
Eccen Moment Moment
Trans
Longitu
BL1
4.5
0.75
BL2
3.5
0.75
BL3
1.5
0.75
BL4
-0.5
0.75
BL5
-2.5
0.75
BL6
-4.5
0.75
Total
0.00
BR1
359.3
4.5
0.75
1616.8
269.5
BR2
174.4
3.5
0.75
610.4
130.8
BR3
121.3
1.5
0.75
181.9
91.0
BR4
-16.5
-0.5
0.75
8.3
-12.4
BR5
2.5
-2.5
0.75
-6.3
1.9
Right Span
BR6
-4.9
22.1
-3.7
Total
636.1
2433.1
477.0
636
2433
477
Total=Left+Right
-4.5
0.75
BCase 7-Class 70R(Tracked) -2L (one at inner edge and the other at outer edge)
Bearing Vertical
Trans
Longitu
Trans
Longitu
marked Reaction
Eccen
Eccen Moment Moment
4.5
0.75
BL2
3.5
0.75
BL3
1.5
0.75
BL4
-0.5
0.75
BL5
-2.5
0.75
BL6
-4.5
0.75
Total
BR1
-6.3
4.5
0.75
-28.3
-4.7
BR2
5.8
3.5
0.75
20.1
4.3
BR3
-8.4
1.5
0.75
-12.7
-6.3
BR4
188.0
-0.5
0.75
-94.0
141.0
BR5
357.0
-2.5
0.75
-892.5
267.7
BR6
100.1
-4.5
0.75
-450.3
75.0
Total
636.0
-1457.5
477.0
636
-1458
477
Right Span
Left Span
BL1

Total (70R+70R)L =
Total (70R+70R)R =
1272
975
954
A Case8- Class 70R(Tracked)+ Class A - 1L

Total effect
(70RT+Cl A) 1L=
(70RT+Cl A) 1L=
1015
1276
193
A Case9- Class 70R(Wheeled)+ Class A - 1L

Total effect
3.2.1.5
(70RW+Cl A) 1L=
(70RW+Cl A) 1L=
1164
1894
304
Summury of Reaction
ReactionLeft Span
Reaction from Right Span
Total
DL
LL Case
SIDL
LL
DL
SIDL
LL
ACase 1-
314.099
566
ACase 2-
403
640
Total (70R+70R)R =
1351
BCase 1-
510
640
1351
510
-201
784
BCase 2-
868
BCase 4-
620
DL
SIDL
2702
1020
Bearing Reaction on EJ Pier when LL moves from one span to another

Reactio
n
Criteria
Max Reaction &
transeverse
moment case
Max Long
moment case
Due to Class 70R only

From
Left
314
From
Right
566
Total
784
784
880
Due to Class 70R +FPLL

on footpath side
From
From
Total
Left
Right
403
640
1044
0
868
868
Due to Class A only

From
Left
640
From
Right
-201
620

Bearing Reaction (T)
Span Type
0
Reaction Left
Right
from
Span
Span
Class 70R 314
566
70R+FPLL 403
640
Class A
-201
640
Live
Load
ACase 1-
314
566
ACase 2-
403
640
Total (70R+70R)R 640

=
-201

(From Staad Analysis)
Eccentri BM=Rx
Description of Live Loads
city eT eT (t-m) Class 70R(Wheeled) - 1 lane placed
4.185
3681
at
edge70R(Wheeled)
on the inner side-2L
of (one at
Class
-1.065 -1111
inner edge and the other at outer
2.500
1098 0
Span Type
0
Reaction Left
Right
from
Span
Span
Class 70R 0
784
70R+FPLL
868
Class A
620
Live
Load
BCase 1-
784
BCase 2-
868
BCase 4-
620
Eccentri BM=Rx
city eT eT (t-m) Class 70R(Wheeled) - 1 lane placed
4.185
3283
at
edge
on the inner side
of at
Class
70R(Wheeled)
-2L (one
-1.065
-924
2.500
1550 0
Left Span
Right Span
SPAN TYPE
DL & SIDL
SIDL + diphragm
Crash Barrier
Dead Load
22.25m span
Distance from bottom of

Pier cap to design Section
(m)
3.312
Pier Base
22.25m span
Reaction
Reaction
510
510
1351
1351
Curtailment
0.000
Piercap bottom
0.000
Column Dimensions
CG of Girder from bot
0.615
0.615
Traffic Direction Transverse Direction

1.800
MAXIMUM
REACTION CASE
: LOAD CASES
TO BE
A1
Left
Span
I
A2
#N/A
A3
MAXIMUM
LONGITUDINAL
MOMENT CASE :
LOAD CASES TO
B1
B2
B3
LL Case
Right
Span
I
Reactio Reactio
n from n from
#N/A
#N/A
1.800
eT (m)
Description of Live Load
#N/A
#N/A
#N/A
#N/A
#N/A
#N/A
#N/A
#N/A
#N/A
#N/A
#N/A
#N/A
#N/A
#N/A
#N/A
#N/A
#N/A
#N/A
#N/A
#N/A
#N/A
3.2.1.6
Horizontal Forces
Bearing Placed at top of the pier cap will be resisting horizontal forces. With respect to
movement along traffic/longitudinal direction, it is assumed that the EJ pier will have
elastomeric bearing.
Thus the EJ pier will have to resist all braking and seismic longitudinal forces due to loads from
longer span while only the friction forces due to loads on the shorter span will need to be
resited by the same.
However, for the transverse direction, horizontal loads from both spans have to be resisted
by the same pier
3.2.1.6.1 Bearing Friction (For elestomeric bearing)

m = coefficient of friction =
acting along transverse direction at hieght of
(Cl. 211.5.1 of IRC : 6 - 2010)
0.350 m above level of pier cap top
Considering LL reactions from the Right span only

LL CaseReaction
All cases 565.51
Calculation
Friction
= 565.5060 =
Shear Rating
= GA/h
N/mm
=182644/55
Ref. bearing design
1502.6 N/mm
Max. Change in Temperature =
Coefficient of thermal expansion =
Coefficient of Shrinkage =
20 0Celcious
1.17E-05
/ 0Celcious
2.00E-04
Total strain due to temperature and shrinkage=
201.17E-05+2.00E-04 =
4.340E-04
5.00E-04
As per Cl. 916.3.4.(2) of IRC 83(part II), strain due to shrinkage, temp etc can be taken
as =
5.188 mm
=20.75 x 1000 x 5.E-04 =
Translation along long. Direction
Force due to translation of one girder
=5.1881502.6/1000=
Force due to translation of six girders
5.1881502.6/1000x6=
7.8 kN
46.8 N
Since the span on both side of the pier having same length and same no.
Force due to translation of six girders on the pier cap from one side =
5.1881502.6/1000x6="
Therefore force due to translation of girders on pier
(46.769-46.8)/1000="
Ecc. =
46.8 N
0.0 KN
0.35
3.2.1.6.2 Braking Forces

As per Cl. 211.2 of IRC: 6 -2010, following value so f braking force have been considered.
Considering live loads from the
LL Case Description of traffic load
Case 1 70R Wheeled - 1 lane
Left Span only

Calculation
=0.21000
Case 2 70R Wheeled - 2 lane

Case 3 Class A - 1 Lane
=0.21000+0.051000
=0.2554+20.05554
=0.2554+0.05554

Case 6 70R Tracked - 1 lane
=0.2554+30.05554
Case 7 70R Tracked - 2 lane

Case 8 70R Tracked + Class A - 1 Lane
=0.2700+0.05700
Case 9 70R Wheeled+ Class A - 1 Lane
=0.21000+0.05554
=0.2700
=0.2700+0.05554
Braking force act along longitudinal direction at height

i.e. 1.2+(9.309-7.744) =
1.2 m above level of carriageway
2.765 m above level of pier cap top
3.2.1.6.3 Centrifugal Forces

2
Centrifugal force, F WV
= /127R
from CL. 212.2 of IRC: 6 -2010
V = design speed =
100 kmph
W = Reaction due to Live Load
R = Radius of Horizontal Curvature =
1000000 m
Centrifugal forces are not considered as the values are very small
3.2.1.6.4 Seismic Forces
(Table 1 of IRC : 6 - 2010)
Load factors for
Live load
0.2
Bearing Friction
Braking Forces
0.5
Water Current Forces
(From Table 1 of IRC 6 : 2010)

Allowable increase in stresses of concrete & steel =
50 % for seismic case
Horizontal seismic force due to LL acts at a height of
1.20 m above top of road
The horizontal seismic force is assumed to be equally distributed to
pier
For seismic load combination

Resultant Transverse =
100 % Trans. +
30 % Long. +
30 % Vert.
Resultant Longitudinal =
30 % Trans. +
100 % Long. +
30 % Vert.
Resultant Vertical =
30 % Trans. +
30 % Long. +
100 % Vert.
3.2.1.6.5 Water current forces (HFL case)

Since the alignment moves along the river and crosses it at various angles the direction of flow
is assumed to act parallel to the alignment, which is the most critical case.
The intensity due to water current in direction parallel to the flow is calculated as below.
Water pressure intensity, P
HFL
52KV2
=
7.350
(Ref. GAD)
Maximum Mean velocity of water, v
3.000
Max velocity of water, V
4.240
Max scour depth
13.660
Bed level
1.632
=3.0002^0.5
(refer IRC 6:2010 - 210.3)
Pile cap top level
3.132
Pile cap bottom level
1.632
Max scour level
-6.31
Scour depth below bed level=1.632--6.31
=7.350-13.660
7.94
Scour depth below pile cap bottom

=1.632--6.31
7.94
4.24
=4.24/(7.350--6.31)(3.132--6.31)
2.93
Velocity at pile cap bottom =4.24/(7.350--6.31)(1.632--6.31)
2.47
K in case of circular piers
0.660
Estimation of Velocitiy of Water at Various depths

Velocity at HFL
Velocity at pile cap top
(refer IRC:6-2010 Cl. 210.2)
Estimation of Water Pressure Intensities at Various depths

At HFL
=520.6604.24^2/100
6.170
At pile cap top level
=520.6602.93^2/100
2.948
At pile cap bottom level
=520.6602.47^2/100
2.086
Water Pressure Profile

Location
Reduced
Pressure
Level
HFL
7.350
6.170
Pilecap Top
3.132
2.948
Pilecap Bottom
1.632
2.086
Max scour level
-6.310
Structur
al
Compon
Force
Load CG Lever arm

RL
above pile cap
Pier
34.6
5.489
2.357
Pile cap
16.2
2.425
-0.707
7.677
All dimensions &

levels are in m
unless otherwise
specified
0.5
0.800
.
Right Span
PSC Girder
1.00E+06
structure design note for CG location, out of various values, maximum value has
ered to have maximum lever arm for horizontal forces. )
2 of IRC: 6 -2010, the superstructure has 2 lanes for movement of live loads
width of carriageway. Following three cased of live loads has been considered
h spans loaded fully with live loads with maximum eccentricity (i.e. LL placed
arest to edge) such that both the vertical reaction and transverse moment at the
ly one span loaded with live load fully such that the longitudinal moment at the
the above cases, following live loads locations along the transverse direction has
ered.
ass 70R(Wheeled) - 1 lane placed at edge on the inner side of carriageway
ass 70R(Wheeled) -2L (one at inner edge and the other at outer edge)
=(10000.965+1000(10.3-3.095))/(1000+1000)
ass 70R(Tracked) - 1 lane placed at edge on the inner side of carriageway
(5540.9+(554(0.9+3.5))+(554(10.3-1.8)))/(3554)
e, a grillage beam model for both spans with live loads moving along the beam has
ed using StaadPro software to get the maximum combined reaction on the EJ pier.
tabulated below. Transverse eccentricity of the applied load at each bearing is
as been used to calculate the transverse moment on the pier.
e, grillage model of span with live loads moving along a specified path with
s has been analyzed using StaadPro software to get the maximum combined
he set of bearings supporting the above span to maximize longitudinal moment on
The other span is not loaded at all so that bearing reactions for that span are all
s are tabulated below.
Total
LL
880
1044
439
784
868
620
Due to Class A only

Total
439
620

Class 70R(Wheeled) - 1 lane placed
at edge70R(Wheeled)
on the inner side-2L
of (one at
Class
0

Class 70R(Wheeled) - 1 lane placed
at
edge
on the inner side
of at
Class
70R(Wheeled)
-2L (one
0
Distance from bottom of

Pier cap to design Section
(m)
Column Dimensions
Transverse Direction
Descriptio
n of Live
#N/A
#N/A
#N/A
#N/A
#N/A
#N/A
ced at top of the pier cap will be resisting horizontal forces. With respect to
along traffic/longitudinal direction, it is assumed that the EJ pier will have
bearing.
pier will have to resist all braking and seismic longitudinal forces due to loads from
while only the friction forces due to loads on the shorter span will need to be
e same.
the transverse direction, horizontal loads from both spans have to be resisted
Braking
200.00
250.00
138.50
166.20
193.90
140.00
175.00
167.70
227.70
m above level of carriageway
gnment moves along the river and crosses it at various angles the direction of flow
o act parallel to the alignment, which is the most critical case.
due to water current in direction parallel to the flow is calculated as below.
m
(Ref. GAD)
m/sec
m/sec
m from HFL
m
m
m
m
m
m
m/sec
m/sec
m/sec
kN/m2
kN/m2
kN/m2
Lever arm
above pile cap
Annexure - C Calculation for Horizontal Seismic Coefficient for EJ Pier:
From Soil Inve

C.1 Calculation of stiffness for pile foundation
Diameter of pile , dpl
1m
Number of pile per pier location, n
4 Nos.
Length of pile
Scour depth below bottom of pile cap
17 m
7.94 m
Cross sectional area of piles, Apl
=3.141^2/4
0.7850 m2
Moment of inertia of one pile (Ipl)
=3.141^4/64
0.0491 m4
9.282 m
Length of fixity (refer calculation given below)

Length of pile to be considered for horizontal action, LplH
17.22 m
Length of pile to be considered for vertical action, LplV
=9.282+7.94
17.00 m
Grade of concrete in pile
M35
Modulus of elasticity of concrete, Ec (From Table 9 of IRC: 21 - 2000)
31.5 kN/mm2
3
Stiffness of one pile KplH = 12EIpl/LplH=(123210^60.0491/17.22^3)
3629 kN/m
Stiffness of pile group = n x KplH
14518 kN/m
Stiffness of one pile KplV = EApl/LplV =31.510^60.7850/17.00
1454559 kN/m
Stiffness of pile group = n x KplV
5818235 kN/m
Horizontal Stiffness
=43629
VerticalStiffness
=41454558.8
C.2 Calculation of stiffness for Pier

Pier diameter, dpr
1.8 m
Cross sectional area of pier, Apr
=3.141.8^2/4
2.5434 m2
Moment of inertia of pier (Ipr)
=3.141.8^4/64
0.5150 m4
Grade of concrete in pier
M45
Modulus of elasticity of concrete, Ec (From Table 9 of IRC: 6 - 2000)
Height of pier above the pile cap up to pier cap top, Lpr
34 kN/mm2
4.612 m
Horizontal Stiffness
Horizontal stiffness KprH = (3EIpr/Lpr3=
) 33410^60.515/4.612^3
527640 kN/m
Vertical Stiffness
Stiffness of one pile KprV = EApr/Lpr =3410^62.5434/4.612
18474393 kN/m
Value of Stiffness (KN/m)

Foundation
Pier
14518
527640
Transverse Direction
Longitudinal Direction
14518
527640
Vertical Direction
5818235
18474393
C.3 Calculation of Equivalent stiffness

Equivalent stiffness K = 1/(1/k1+ 1/k2)
Equivalent stiffness along horizontal direction
=1/(1/14518+1/527640) =
14129 kN/m
Equivalent stiffness along vertical direction
=1/(1/5818235+1/18474393) =
4424732 kN/m
C.4 Calculation of Seismic Mass

C.4.1
Along Transverse Direction
For, this case, loads from both the spans are considered as the pier will have to resist transverse force
from both spans.
Total DL (Girder+Deck+Diaph.)
270.2 T
Total SIDL (WC+CB+Median)
102.0 T
8.8 T
380.9 T
20% of total LL reaction without impact =20%439.0755/10

(minm live load reaction considered)
Seismic Mass along transverse direction
C.4.2
=270.2+102.0+8.8
Along Longitudinal Direction
For this case, loads from Left Span only are considered as the pier will have to resist longitudinal forces
from Left Span only.
135.1 T
51.0 T
No Live loads
of need
total LL
to reaction
be considered
withoutforimpact
seismic longitudinal case as given in Cl. 219.5.2 of IRC:6-2010
Seismic Mass along longitudinal direction
=135.1+51.0
186.1 T
C.4.3
Along Vertical Direction
For, this case, loads from both the spans are considered as the pier will have to resist transverse force
from both spans.
270.2 T
102.0 T
8.8 T
380.9 T
20% of total LL reaction without impact =20%0/10

(minm live load reaction considered)
Seismic Mass along vertical direction direction =270.2+102.0+8.8
C.5 Calculation of Seismic Coefficients
From Cl. 219.5.1 of IRC: 6 - 2010,
Seismic Zone :
III
Zone factor, Z =
0.16
Importance Factor, I =
1.5
Soil Type :
Response reduction Factor =
(refer Table 7 of IRC: 6 -2010)

C.5.1
Rocky
1.5
(refer Table 8 of IRC: 6 -2010)(for elestomeric bearing)
Along Transverse Direction

Total mass (DL + SIDL + LL)
Equivalent stiffness
Natural time period, TT =
Since
=23.14(380.9/14129)^0.5
1.031 sec
Sa/g =
>
AhT
380.9 T
14129 KN/m
1.031 sec
0.4 sec
1 / 1.031 =
0.97
0.16
Transvers Seismic Coefficient
0.97
1.5
1.5
=
C.5.2
0.078
Along Longitudinal Direction

Since
=23.14(186.1/14129)^0.5
0.721 sec
Sa/g =
>
1 / 0.721 =
0.4 sec
1.39
186.1 T
14129 KN/m
0.721 sec
0.16
AhT
Longitudinal Seismic Coefficient
1.39
1.5
1.5
=
C.5.3
0.112
Along Vertical Direction

Since
=23.14(380.9/4424732)^0.5
0.058 sec
<
380.9 T
4424732 KN/m
0.058 sec
0.4 sec
Sa/g =
2.50
0.16
Vertical Seismic Coefficient
AhT
2.50
1.5
1.5
=
Annexure - D
0.200
Calculation of depth of fixity and maximum moment in pile
The depth of fixity and bending moments in the pile have been worked out as per IS 2911 Part 1/ sec2
Appendix C (clause 5.5.2). The pile is considered to be in submerged soil of dense sand type. Fixed head
Pile Dia
R
=
=
Diameter of the pile

(E * I / K2)^0.25
Youngs Modulus of the concrete in kg/cm2
1.000 m
where
E
I
K2
Moment of Inertia of the pile cross section in cm
Modulus of subgrade reaction as per Table 1
315000 kg/cm
4
4908739 cm
2
48.8 kg/cm
(315000 * 4908739 / 48.8) ^ 0.25 )
421.9 cm
L1
Free length of pile above ground level
794.2 cm
7.942 m
L1 /R
794.2 / 421.9
1.9
Lf / R
(fig 2 - for fixed headed piles in sands )
2.2
Lf
2.2 * 421.9
928.2 cm
9.282 m
3.2.2 Load Combination For Pier P3

Total height from founding level to the top of Road level
Pier height for design
=
3.2.2.1
DEAD LOADS
From Superstructure
Left span 22.25m span
Reaction due to DL
Reaction due to SIDL
Total Dead load due to DL+SIDL

Longitudinal moment due to
DL
SIDL
135.1
Right span22.25m span

T
135.1 T
Height of crash barrier

Thickness of Wearing coat
51.0 T
=
135.1
=
=
135.1

( T-m )
13.3
-127.5
DL
SIDL
1 m.
65 mm.
51.0 T

ML
Reaction
(T)
( T-m )
135.1
-101.3
51.0
-38.2
Transverse moment due to
3.2.2.2
=
7.677 m.
3.312 m. ( Existing G.L to proposed Road level )
51.0 +
51.0 =
373 T
Right span 22.25m span

ML
Reaction
(T)
( T-m )
135.1
101.3
51.0
38.2
Total
ML
( T-m )
0.0
0.0

( T-m )
13.3
-127.5
TOTAL =
Moment
(T-m)
26.5
-254.9
-228
LIVE LOAD EFFECT

I) LL CASE A1
LL Reaction due to LL CASE A1
=
L.L eccentricity in transverse direction =
Trans. B.M. due to LL CASE A1
=
Long. B.M. due to LL CASE A1
=
31
4.185
+
m.
II) LL CASE A2
L.L eccentricity in transverse direction
=
=
=
=
40 +
-1.065 m.
III) LL CASE A3
Trans. B.M due to LL CASE A3
=
=
=
=
64
4.125
IV) LL CASE A4
=
=
=
=
128
+
-1.095 m.
V) LL CASE A5
=
=
187 +
3.350 m.
+
m.
57
64
-20
-40
-55
88
=
=
343
19
T-m
T-m
105
=
=
135
37
t-m
T-m
44
=
=
97
-64
T-m
T-m
88
=
=
193
-126
T-m
T-m
132

=
=
=
=
59
-182
t-m
T-m
69
=
=
263
-3
T-m
T-m
69
=
=
105
-4
T-m
T-m
113
=
=
359
-65
t-m
T-m
82
=
=
439
-44
T-m
T-m
=
=
=
79
306
59
T
T-m
T-m
VI) LL CASE A6
=
=
=
=
36
2.500
VII) LL CASE A7
=
=
=
=
36
0.550
VIII) LL CASE A8
=
=
=
=
IX) LL CASE A9
=
=
=
=
46
1.499

I) LL CASE B1
LL Reaction due to LL CASE B1
Trans. B.M. due to LL CASE B1
Long. B.M. due to LL CASE B1
=
=
=
II) LL CASE B2
Trans. B.M. due to LL CASE B2
=
=
=
0 +
87
=
=
=
87
-220
66
T
t-m
T-m
III) LL CASE B3
Trans. B.M due to LL CASE B3
=
=
=
0 +
38
=
=
=
38
-116
-28
T
T-m
T-m
IV) LL CASE A4
=
=
=
=
=
=
62
136
47
T
T-m
T-m
V) LL CASE A5
=
=
=
=
=
=
93
42
70
T
t-m
T-m
VI) LL CASE A6
=
=
=
=
=
=
64
243
48
T
T-m
T-m
+
m.
+
m.
33
33
100 +
0.823 m.
+
m.
13
36
78
62
0 +
93
`
0
64
VII) LL CASE A7
=
=
=
VIII) LL CASE A8
=
=
=
IX) LL CASE A9
=
=
=
3.2.2.3
0 +
127
102
116
FORCE DUE TO BEARING FRICTION (For elestomeric bearing)

0
m = coefficient of friction =

Bearing+Pedestal Height
0.35 m
Reaction
Bearing
Friction Force due to
(T)
Friction (T)
135
0.0
DL+SIDL
51.0
0.0
Wearing coat
0.0
0.0
Crash barrier
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
Total
I) LL CASE A1
0
Friction mobilised by sliding bearings
=
Max. Horizontal force / pier
=
acting at
B.M at top of pier cap
=
0
x
II) LL CASE A2
0
=
=
acting at
=
0
x
III) LL CASE A3
0
=
=
acting at
=
0
x
I) LL CASE B1
0
=
=
acting at
=
0
x
II) LL CASE B2
0
=
=
acting at
=
=
=
128
98
95
T
T-m
T-m
=
=
=
102
128
19
T
t-m
T-m
=
=
=
117
189
30
T
T-m
T-m
(Cl. 211.5.1 of IRC : 6 - 2010)

0.35 m
Reaction
Bearing
Totol Bearing
(T)
Friction (T)
Friction (T)
135
0.0
0.0
51.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0
0.00
x(
31
+
57
0
T
0.350 m
above top of pier cap
0.350
=
0 T-m
0.00
x(
40
+
64
0
T
0.350 m
0.35
=
0 T-m
0.00
x(
64
+
-20
0
T
0.350 m
0.35
=
0.00 t-m.
0.00
x(
0
+
78
0
T
0.350 m
0.350
=
0 T-m
0.00
x(
0
+
87
0
T
0.350 m
Lever arm
Longitudinal
(m) above
Moment (Tm)
pier cap
0.000
0.0
0.000
0.0
0.000
0.0
0.0
0.0
0
0.0
(in the Longitudinal Direction)

)
0.0

)
0.0
=
0 T-m
0.0

)
0.0

=
0
x
III) LL CASE B3
0
=
=
acting at
=
0
x
0.35
0 T-m
0.00
x(
0
+
38
0
T
0.350 m
0.35
=
0.00 t-m.

)
0.0
=
0 T-m
In elastomeric bearing the friction co-efficient is 0 so there is no bearing friction force due to
other horizontal and vertical forces
Forces due to elestomeric bearig =
ecc. From the base of pier cap top =
=
0.0 KN
0.35 m
0.00 KN-m
0.00 t
0.00 t-m
3.2.2.4 FORCE DUE TO BRAKING

I) LL CASE A1
Total Braking Force
=
20.000 t
=
acting above top of pier cap at a hieght of

=
10.00
x
10.00 t.
=
2.765 m
=
28 t-m., Say
27.65 t-m.
34.56 t-m.
=
35 t-m., Say
III) LL CASE A3
Total braking force
=
13.850 t
=
6.93 t.
acting at
2.765 m. above top of pier cap.
=
6.93
x
2.765
=
19.15 t-m.
=
20 t-m., Say
II) LL CASE A2
Total Braking Force
=
25.000 t
=
2.765
12.50 t.
acting at
=
12.50
x
2.765
IV) LL CASE A4
Total Braking Force
=
16.620 t
=

=
8.31
x
8.31 t.
=
2.765 m
=
23 t-m., Say
22.98 t-m.
26.81 t-m.
VI) LL CASE A6
Total braking force
=
14.000 t
=
7.00 t.
acting at
=
7.00
x
2.765
=
19.36 t-m.
20 t-m., Say
24.19 t-m.
=
=
2.765 m
25 t-m., Say
V) LL CASE A5
Total Braking Force
=
19.390 t
=
2.765
9.70 t.
acting at
=
9.70
x
2.765
VII) LL CASE A7
Total Braking Force
=
=
27 t-m., Say
17.500 t
=

=
8.75
x
8.75 t.
2.765

VIII) LL CASE A8
Total Braking Force
=
16.770 t
=
8.39 t.
acting at
=
8.39
x
2.765
23.18 t-m.
IX) LL CASE A9
Total braking force
=
22.770 t
=
11.39 t.
acting at
=
11.39
x
2.765
=
31.48 t-m.
=
24 t-m., Say
32 t-m., Say

I) LL CASE B1
Total Braking Force
=
16.620 t
=
acting above top of pier cap at a hieght of=

=
8.31
x
8.31 t.
=
2.765 m
=
23 t-m., Say
22.98 t-m.
26.81 t-m.
=
27 t-m., Say

=
7.00 t.
acting at
=
7.00
x
2.77
=
19.36 t-m.
=
20 t-m., Say
II) LL CASE B2
Total Braking Force
=
19.390 t
=
2.765
9.70 t.
acting at
=
9.70
x
2.77
III) LL CASE B3
Total braking force
14.000 t
3.2.2.5 FORCE DUE TO CENTRIFUGAL FORCES

I) LL CASE A1
Total Centrifugal Force
0.0 t
0.00 t.

II) LL CASE A2
2.765
0.00 t-m.
=
0 t-m., Say
0.00 t-m.
=
0 t-m., Say
0.0 t
=
0.00 t.
III) LL CASE A3
2.765 m
Total Centrifugal Force =

acting at
0.00
0.00
0.0 t
2.77

=
0.00 t.
acting at
0.00
2.77
0.00 t-m.
=
0 t-m., Say

I) LL CASE B1
0.0 t
0.00 t.

II) LL CASE B2
2.765
2.765 m
0.00 t-m.
=
0 t-m., Say
0.00 t-m.
=
0 t-m., Say
0.00 t-m.
=
0 t-m., Say
Total Centrifugal Force =

acting at
0.00
0.0 t
=
0.00 t.
III) LL CASE B3
0.00
2.77
0.0 t

=
0.00 t.
acting at
0.00
2.77
3.2.2.6
WIND CONDITION
Wind load does not govern the design; hence the same has not been presented.
3.2.2.7
SEISMIC CONDITION
Horizontal seismic coefficient in transverse direction
0.078
Horizontal seismic coefficient in longitudinal direction

Vertical seismic coefficient
=
=
0.112
0.200
Seismic force in transverse direction

Seismic force in Longitudinal direction
Seismic force in Vertical direction
(Ref. Anexure-A)
= Weight of the structural components

x
x
x
0.078
0.112
0.200
3.2.2.7.1 CALCULATION OF LOADS & LEVER ARMS FOR SEISMIC FORCES (in Transverse direction only)
For, this case, loads from both the spans are considered as the pier will have to resist transverse force from both spans.
DEAD LOAD
1) Wearing Coat + Crash barrier
Total Reaction
=
50.98
acting at =
0.350
2) Girder & Deck slab
+
+
50.98
1.150
0.5
=
=
102 T
2.000 m., above top of pier cap
Combined CG of girder & Deck slab

=
0.615 m. ( from bottom of girder )
wt. of girder + deck slab / span
=
135.1 +
135.1 =
270.2 T
acting at =
0.350
+
0.615
=
LIVE LOAD
Horizontal seismic force acts at a height of
1.20 m above top of road
The horizontal seismic force is assumed to be equally distributed to
1 piers
Reduction coefficient for live load in seismic condition =
0.20 (Table 1 of IRC : 6 - 2010)
I) LL CASE A1
Load due to live load
Seismic force
=
=
acting at
II) LL CASE A2
Seismic force
=
=
=
III) LL CASE A3
Seismic force
x
20%
=
9
x
0.078
=
0.7
1
2.765 m. , above top of pier cap
88
18
x
20%
=
18
x
0.078
=
1.4
1
132
26
x
20%
=
26
x
0.078
=
2.1
1
69
14
x
20%
=
14
x
0.078
=
1.1
1
69
14
x
20%
=
14
x
0.078
=
1.1
1
113
23
x
20%
=
23
x
0.078
=
1.8
1
82
=
=
=
=
acting at
VI) LL CASE A6
Seismic force
=
=
acting at
VII) LL CASE A7
Seismic force
=
=
=
VIII) LL CASE A8
Seismic force
=
=
acting at
IX) LL CASE A9
44
9
V) LL CASE A5
Seismic force
=
acting at
x
20%
=
21
x
0.078
=
1.6
1
IV) LL CASE A4
Seismic force
x
20%
=
18
x
0.078
=
1.4
1
0.350
+
1.150
+
0.065
105
21
=
acting at
88
18
20%
16
1.200
Seismic force
=
acting at
16
x
0.078
=
1.3
1

I) LL CASE A1
Seismic force
=
=
acting at
II) LL CASE A2
Seismic force
=
=
=
=
acting at
79
16
x
20%
=
16
x
0.078
=
1.2
1
0.350
+
1.150
+
0.065
87
17
x
20%
=
17
x
0.078
=
1.4
1
T
T
+
T
T
1.200
III) LL CASE A3
Seismic force
=
=
acting at
IV) LL CASE A4
Seismic force
=
=
=
V) LL CASE A5
Seismic force
=
=
acting at
VI) LL CASE A6
Seismic force
=
=
acting at
VII) LL CASE A7
Seismic force
=
=
=
VIII) LL CASE A8
Seismic force
=
=
acting at
IX) LL CASE A9
Seismic force
=
=
acting at
38
8
x
20%
=
8
x
0.078
=
0.6
1
62
12
x
20%
=
12
x
0.078
=
1.0
1
93
19
x
20%
=
19
x
0.078
=
1.5
1
64
13
x
20%
=
13
x
0.078
=
1.0
1
128
26
x
20%
=
26
x
0.078
=
2.0
1
102
20
x
20%
=
20
x
0.078
=
1.6
1
117
23
x
20%
=
23
x
0.078
=
1.8
1
3.2.2.7.2 CALCULATION OF LOADS & LEVER ARMS FOR SEISMIC FORCES (in Longitudinal direction only)
DEAD LOAD
For this case, loads from Left Span only are considered as the pier will have to resist longitudinal forces from
left span only
1) Wearing Coat & crash barrier
Total Reaction
=
50.98
+
0.00
=
51 T
Seismic Force along longitudinal direction=
50.98
x
0.112
=
5.71 T
acting at =
0.350
+
1.150
+
0.500
=
Longitudinal Moment
=
5.71
x
2.000
=
11.4 Tm
2) Girder & Deck slab
Combined CG of girder & Deck slab
=
0.615 m. ( from bottom of girder )
wt. of girder + deck slab / span
=
135.1
=
135 T
Seismic Force along longitudinal direction= 135.10
x
0.112
=
15.1 T
acting at =
0.350
+
0.615
=
Longitudinal Moment
=
15.13
x
0.965
=
14.6 Tm
LIVE LOAD
No Live loads need to be considered for seismic longitudinal case as given in Cl. 219.5.2 of IRC:6-2010
SEISMIC FORCE AT TOP OF PIER CAP
Load from
Weight
(T)
Lever arm
Transverse Seismic Forces Longitudinal Seismic Forces
for Horz. Force Seismic force
B.M.
Seismic force
B.M.
(m)
(T)
( T-m )
(T)
( T-m )
DL.
102
2.000
8.0
15.9
5.7
11.4
20.4
SIDL.
270
0.965
21.1
20.3
15.1
14.6
54.0
30
37
21
27
75
Total due to DL+SIDL
Vertical
Force
(T)
Maximum Reaction & Transverse

moment case
Due to Live Loads
3.2.2.8
LL CASE A1
18
2.765
1.4
3.5
LL CASE A2
21
2.765
1.6
4.2
LL CASE A3
2.765
0.7
1.8
LL CASE A4
18
2.765
1.4
3.5
LL CASE A5
26
2.765
2.1
5.3
LL CASE A6
14
2.765
1.1
2.8
LL CASE A7
14
2.765
1.1
2.8
LL CASE A8
23
2.765
1.8
4.5
LL CASE A9
16
2.765
1.3
3.3
LL CASE A1
16
2.765
1.2
3.2
LL CASE A2
17
2.765
1.4
3.5
LL CASE A3
2.765
0.6
1.5
LL CASE A4
12
2.765
1.0
2.5
LL CASE A5
19
2.765
1.5
3.7
LL CASE A6
13
2.765
1.0
2.6
LL CASE A7
26
2.765
2.0
5.1
LL CASE A8
20
2.765
1.6
4.1
LL CASE A9
23
2.765
1.8
4.7
SUMMARY OF LOADS & BENDING MOMENTS AT TOP OF PIER CAP (All loads are in tonnes & moments in t-m)
Vertical Load
P (T)
1
2
a
b
c
d
e
f
g
h
373
Dead load including SIDL
Live Load
88
LL CASE A1
105
LL CASE A2
44
LL CASE A3
88
LL CASE A4
132
LL CASE A5
69
LL CASE A6
69
LL CASE A7
113
LL CASE A8
AT TOP OF PIER CAP

Longitudinal Forces
Transverse Forces
HL (T)
ML (T-m)
HT (T)
MT (T-m)
-228
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
19
37
-64
-126
-182
-3
-4
-65
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
343
135
97
193
59
263
105
359
82
i LL CASE A9
79
a LL CASE A1
87
b LL CASE A2
38
c LL CASE A3
62
d LL CASE A4
93
e LL CASE A5
64
f LL CASE A6
128
g LL CASE A7
102
h LL CASE A8
117
i LL CASE A9
-44
439
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
59
66
-28
47
70
48
95
19
30
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
306
-220
-116
136
42
243
98
128
189
a
b
c
d
e
f
g
h
i
Braking Force
0
LL CASE A1
0
LL CASE A2
0
LL CASE A3
0
LL CASE A4
0
LL CASE A5
0
LL CASE A6
0
LL CASE A7
0
LL CASE A8
0
LL CASE A9
10.0
12.5
6.9
8.3
9.7
7.0
8.8
8.4
11.4
28
35
20
23
27
20
25
24
32
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
a
b
c
d
e
f
g
h
i

0
LL CASE A1
0
LL CASE A2
0
LL CASE A3
0
LL CASE A4
0
LL CASE A5
0
LL CASE A6
0
LL CASE A7
0
LL CASE A8
0
LL CASE A9
10.0
12.5
6.9
8.3
9.7
7.0
8.8
8.4
11.4
28
35
20
23
27
20
25
24
32
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
30.0
37
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1.4
1.6
0.7
1.4
2.1
1.1
1.1
1.8
1.3
4
5
2
4
6
3
3
5
4
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1.2
1.4
0.6
1.0
1.5
1.0
2.0
1.6
1.8
4
4
2
3
5
3
6
5
6
Seismic in transverse direction

0
a due to D.L
0
a LL CASE A1
0
b LL CASE A2
0
c LL CASE A3
0
d LL CASE A4
0
e LL CASE A5
0
f LL CASE A6
0
g LL CASE A7
0
h LL CASE A8
0
i LL CASE A9
a
b
c
d
e
f
g
h
i

0
LL CASE A1
0
LL CASE A2
0
LL CASE A3
0
LL CASE A4
0
LL CASE A5
0
LL CASE A6
0
LL CASE A7
0
LL CASE A8
0
LL CASE A9
Seismic in Vertical direction

75
a due to D.L
a
b
c
d
e
f
g
h
i
a
b
c
d
e
f
g
h
i
3.5
LL CASE A1
4.2
LL CASE A2
1.8
LL CASE A3
3.5
LL CASE A4
5.3
LL CASE A5
2.8
LL CASE A6
2.8
LL CASE A7
4.5
LL CASE A8
3.3
LL CASE A9
3.2
LL CASE A1
3.5
LL CASE A2
1.5
LL CASE A3
2.5
LL CASE A4
3.7
LL CASE A5
2.6
LL CASE A6
5.1
LL CASE A7
4.1
LL CASE A8
4.7
LL CASE A9
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Vide cl.203 of IRC: 6 - 2000 ;

Allowable increase in stresses of concrete & steel
=
50 % for seismic case
Actual Load (or Moment)
Factored Load / moment =
for Seismic condition
1.5
For seismic condition load factors (LFs) are
(From Table 1 of IRC 6 : 2010)
Live load =
0.2
Bearing Friction =
1
Water Current Forces =
1
Braking Forces =
0.5
Centrifugal Forces =
0.5
For seismic load combination
Resultant Transverse Force =
100 % Trans. Force +
30 % Long. Force +
Resultant Longitudinal Force =
30 % Trans. Force +
100 % Long. Force +
Resultant Vertical Force =
30 % Trans. Force +
30 % Long. Force +
3.2.2.9
CALCULATION OF LOADS FOR SUBSTRUCTURE

Area of the piercap trapezoidal portion =(9.800+2.300)/20.800
Depth of CG from top
=0.500+0.800/3(29.800+2.300)/(9.800+2.300)
Volume of concrete in pier cap
=
9.800 x
0.500 x
2.300 +
=
22.40 m3.
Self wt. of pier cap
=
22.40
x
2.4
=
53.76 t.
=
Height of CG of Pier cap
Area (A)
LeverArm (L)
AxL
Rectangular area at top
4.900 m2
0.250 m
1.225 m3
Trapezodal Portion
4.840 m2
1.483 m
7.178 m3
Total
9.740 m2
CG of pier cap from its top = 8.403/9.740
CG of pier cap from its bottom = 1.300 - 0.863
=
=
8.403 m3
0.863 m
0.437 m
30 % Vert. Force
30 % Vert. Force
100 % Vert. Force
=
=
4.84
54 T
4.840 m2
0.983 m
2.300
CALCULATION OF SELF WEIGHT OF PIER UP TO PIER SECTIONS AT DIFFERENT HEIGHT

DISTANCE OF BASE OF PIER FROM BOTTOM OF PIER CAP
=
3.312 m.
Distance
3.312
0.000
0.000
from
Dist.bottom
from
4.612
1.300
1.300
Diatop
of of
pier
1.800
1.800
1.800
(m)
Weight of
pierof pier
( T +)
wt.
pier cap
20
74
0
54
0
54
CALCULATION OF SEISMIC FORCES ON SUBSTRUCTURE AT DIFFERENT HEIGHT

PIER CAP
Pier Cap Wt. =
Lever arm (m)

Trans. BM
( T-mBM
)
Long.
( T-m )
Trans.
Seism.
force
Long.
Seism.
force
Vert. Seism.
force (arm
T)
Lever
(m)
MT ( T - m )
ML ( T - m )
Total HT
( T )HL
Total
( T Vert
)
Total
Force
(T
Total M
T )
( T-mM)L
Total
( T-m )
54 t. Trans. seismic force

=
Long. seismic force
=
Vert. seismic force
=
3.749
0.437
0.437
15
2
2
22
3
3
PIER
1.6
0
0
2.3
0
0
4.0
0
0
1.656
0.000
0.000
3
0
0
4
0
0
6
4
4
8
6
6
16
11
11
18
2
2
26
3
3
4.0 t.
6.0 t.
11.0 t.
The above forces are added to the summary of forces & the revised summary of forces are presented below for different design
sections.
The additional BM at the design sections are calculated by multiplying the horizontal force at top of pier cap & the dist. of
design section from top of pier cap
3.2.2.10 SUMMARY OF LOADS & BENDING MOMENTS AT PIER BASE
Distance from top of Road to
Section
=
6.177 m
Dist. from top of pier cap

=
Vertical load
Longitudinal Forces
HL (T)
ML (T-m)
P (T)
447
0
0
1 Dead load including SIDL

2 Live Load
88
a LL CASE A1
105
b LL CASE A2
44
c LL CASE A3
88
d LL CASE A4
132
e LL CASE A5
69
f LL CASE A6
69
g LL CASE A7
113
h LL CASE A8
82
i LL CASE A9
a
b
c
d
(All loads are in tonnes & moments in t-m)

79
LL CASE A1
87
LL CASE A2
38
LL CASE A3
62
LL CASE A4
4.612 m.
Transverse Forces
HT (T)
MT (T-m)
0
-228
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
19
37
-64
-126
-182
-3
-4
-65
-44
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
343
135
97
193
59
263
105
359
439
0
0
0
0
59
66
-28
47
0
0
0
0
306
-220
-116
136
0
0
0
0
0
70
48
95
19
30
0
0
0
0
0
42
243
98
128
189
a
b
c
d
e
f
g
h
i
93
LL CASE A5
64
LL CASE A6
128
LL CASE A7
102
LL CASE A8
117
LL CASE A9
Braking Force
0
LL CASE A1
0
LL CASE A2
0
LL CASE A3
0
LL CASE A4
0
LL CASE A5
0
LL CASE A6
0
LL CASE A7
0
LL CASE A8
0
LL CASE A9
10.0
12.5
6.9
8.3
9.7
7.0
8.8
8.4
11.4
74
93
52
61
72
52
65
63
85
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
a
b
c
d
e
f
g
h
i

0
LL CASE A1
0
LL CASE A2
0
LL CASE A3
0
LL CASE A4
0
LL CASE A5
0
LL CASE A6
0
LL CASE A7
0
LL CASE A8
0
LL CASE A9
10.0
12.5
6.9
8.3
9.7
7.0
8.8
8.4
11.4
74
93
52
61
72
52
65
63
85
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
3.5
8.2
3.5
8.2
36.0
193
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1.4
1.6
0.7
1.4
2.1
1.1
1.1
1.8
1.3
10
13
5
10
15
8
8
13
10
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1.2
1.4
0.6
1.0
1.5
1.0
2.0
1.6
1.8
10
10
7
8
11
9
13
11
12
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
e
f
g
h
i
4
0
6 Water current forces
7 Seismic in transverse direction
0
a due to D.L
0
a LL CASE A1
0
b LL CASE A2
0
c LL CASE A3
0
d LL CASE A4
0
e LL CASE A5
0
f LL CASE A6
0
g LL CASE A7
0
h LL CASE A8
0
i LL CASE A9
a
b
c
d
e
f
g
h
i
9
a
a
b
c
d

0
LL CASE A1
0
LL CASE A2
0
LL CASE A3
0
LL CASE A4
0
LL CASE A5
0
LL CASE A6
0
LL CASE A7
0
LL CASE A8
0
LL CASE A9
Seismic in Vertical direction
91
due to D.L
3.5
LL CASE A1
4.2
LL CASE A2
1.8
LL CASE A3
3.5
LL CASE A4
e
f
g
h
i
NORMAL
Maximum
Longitudinal
Moment case
Maximum
Reaction &
Transverse
a
b
c
d
e
f
g
h
i
5.3
LL CASE A5
2.8
LL CASE A6
2.8
LL CASE A7
4.5
LL CASE A8
3.3
LL CASE A9
3.2
LL CASE A1
3.5
LL CASE A2
1.5
LL CASE A3
2.5
LL CASE A4
3.7
LL CASE A5
2.6
LL CASE A6
5.1
LL CASE A7
4.1
LL CASE A8
4.7
LL CASE A9
SEISMIC TRANSVERSE
Maximum
Reaction &
Transverse
Maximum
Longitudinal
Moment case
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
LOAD COMBINATIONS
535
13
101
123
1+2(b)+3(a)+4(b)+
5(b)-6
552
121
-3
-101
103
1+2(c)+3(a)+4(c)+
5(c)+6
491
10
-4
-123
104
1+2(d)+3(a)+4(d)+
5(d)+6
526
13
141
86
105
1+2(e)+3(a)+4(e)+
5(e)-6
534
150
-3
-456
106
1+2(f)+3(a)+4(f)+5
(f)+6
101 (including LF)
+7(a+b)+30%x8(a
+b)+30%x9(a+b)
102 (including LF) -
564
10
91
-30
493
( 329 )
497
( 331 )
484
( 323 )
491
( 328 )
493
( 329 )
498
( 332 )
493
( 329 )
497
( 331 )
484
( 323 )
491
( 328 )
493
( 329 )
498
( 332 )
559
( 373 )
563
( 376 )
549
( 366 )
13
(9)
13
(9)
13
(9)
13
(9)
13
(9)
13
(9)
33
( 22 )
34
( 22 )
33
( 22 )
33
( 22 )
34
( 22 )
33
( 22 )
13
(9)
13
(9)
13
(9)
64
( 43 )
70
( 46 )
45
( 30 )
72
( 48 )
76
( 50 )
64
( 43 )
169
( 113 )
174
( 116 )
150
( 100 )
177
( 118 )
180
( 120 )
169
( 113 )
64
( 43 )
70
( 46 )
45
( 30 )
41
( 27 )
-34
-( 23 )
40
( 27 )
41
( 27 )
-34
-( 23 )
40
( 27 )
15
( 10 )
15
( 10 )
14
( 10 )
15
( 10 )
15
( 10 )
14
( 10 )
15
( 10 )
15
( 10 )
14
( 10 )
52
( 35 )
-398
-( 266 )
-2
-( 2 )
44
( 29 )
-467
-( 311 )
18
( 12 )
-90
-( 60 )
-131
-( 87 )
-141
-( 94 )
-98
-( 65 )
-203
-( 135 )
-122
-( 81 )
-90
-( 60 )
-131
-( 87 )
-141
-( 94 )
108
109
110
111
114
115
116
117
118
119
SEISMIC VERTICAL
0
0
0
0
0
102
112
SEISMIC LONGITUDINAL
Maximum
Reaction &
Transverse
0
0
0
0
0
1+2(a)+3(a)+4(a)+
5(a)+6
113
Maximum
Longitudinal
Moment case
0
0
0
0
0
101
107
Maximum
Reaction &
Transverse
0
0
0
0
0
120
121
7(a+c)+30%x8(a+
c)+30%x9(a+c)
103 (including LF)
+7(a+d)+30%x8(a
+d)+30%x9(a+d)
104 (including LF)
+7(a+e)+30%x8(a
105 (including LF) 7(a+f)+30%x8(a+f)
+30%x9(a+f)
106 (including LF)
+7(a+g)+30%x8(a
+g)+30%x9(a+g)
101 (including LF)
+30%x7(a+b)+8(a
+b)+30%x9(a+b)
102 (including LF)
+30%x7(a+c)+8(a
+c)+30%x9(a+c)
103 (including LF)
+30%7(a+d)+8(a+
d)+30%x9(a+d)
104 (including LF)
+30%x7(a+e)+8(a
+e)+30%x9(a+e)
105 (including LF)
+30%x7(a+f)+8(a+
f)+30%x9(a+f)
106 (including LF)
+30%x7(a+g)+8(a
+g)+30%x9(a+g)
101 (including LF)
+30%x7(a+b)+30
%x8(a+b)+9(a+b)
102 (including LF)
+30%x7(a+c)+30
%x8(a+c)+9(a+c)
103 (including LF)
+30%7(a+d)+30%
x8(a+d)+9(a+d)
SEISMIC VERTICAL
Maximum
Longitudinal
Moment case
122
123
124
104 (including LF)

+30%x7(a+e)+30
%x8(a+e)+9(a+e)
105 (including LF)
+30%x7(a+f)+30%
x8(a+f)+9(a+f)
106 (including LF)
+30%x7(a+g)+30
%x8(a+g)+9(a+g)
557
( 371 )
559
( 373 )
563
( 375 )
13
(9)
13
(9)
13
(9)
72
( 48 )
76
( 50 )
64
( 43 )
15
( 10 )
15
( 10 )
14
( 10 )
-98
-( 65 )
-203
-( 135 )
-122
-( 81 )
At the level of 1st reinforcement curtailment in pier

Section
=
2.87 m

=
Vertical load
Longitudinal Forces
HL (T)
ML (T-m)
P (T)
427
0
0
1 Dead load
2 Live Load
88
a LL CASE A1
105
b LL CASE A2
44
c LL CASE A3
d
e
f
3
a

79
LL CASE A1
87
LL CASE A2
38
LL CASE A9
Bearing Friction
0
due to D.L
0
b LL CASE A1
0
c LL CASE A2
0
d LL CASE A3
0
e LL CASE A1
0
f LL CASE A2
0
g LL CASE A9

0
a due to D.L
0
b LL CASE A1
0
c LL CASE A2
0
d LL CASE A3
0
0
0
19
37
-64
0
0
0
343
135
97
0
0
0
59
0
-28
0
0
0
306
-220
-116
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
34
78
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
2
1
6
7
3
0
0
0
1
1
2
6
6
8
19
115
NORMAL
SEISMIC TRANSVERSE
Maximum
Longitudinal
Moment case
Maximum
Reaction &
Transverse

0
0
e LL CASE A1
0
0
f LL CASE A2
0
0
g LL CASE A9
LOAD COMBINATIONS
515
0
101
1+2(a)+3(a)+3(b)
Maximum
Reaction &
Transverse
1.300 m.
Transverse Forces
HT (T)
MT (T-m)
0
-228
102
1+2(b)+3(a)+3(c)
532
37
-93
103
1+2(c)+3(a)+3(d)
471
-64
-131
104
1+2(d)+3(a)+3(e)
506
59
78
105
1+2(e)+3(a)+3(f)
514
-448
106
1+2(f)+3(a)+3(g)
465
-28
-344
107
101+4(a)+4(b)
445
( 296 )
0
(0)
4
(3)
35
( 24 )
-76
-( 50 )
SEISMIC TRANSVERSE
Maximum
Reaction &
Transverse
Maximum
Longitudinal
Moment case
108
102+4(a)+4(c)
109
103+4(a)+4(d)
110
104+4(a)+4(e)
111
105+4(a)+4(f)
112
106+4(a)+4(g)
448
( 299 )
436
( 291 )
443
( 295 )
444
( 296 )
435
( 290 )
0
(0)
0
(0)
0
(0)
0
(0)
0
(0)
7
(5)
-13
-( 9 )
12
(8)
0
(0)
-6
-( 4 )
36
( 24 )
35
( 23 )
35
( 23 )
35
( 24 )
36
( 24 )
-116
-( 77 )
-128
-( 85 )
-83
-( 55 )
-188
-( 125 )
-165
-( 110 )
At pier cap bottom

Section
=
2.87 m

=
Vertical load
Longitudinal Forces
HL (T)
ML (T-m)
P (T)
427
0
0
1 Dead load
2 Live Load
88
a LL CASE A1
105
b LL CASE A2
44
c LL CASE A3
d
e
f
3
a

79
LL CASE A1
87
LL CASE A2
38
LL CASE A9
Bearing Friction
0
due to D.L
0
b LL CASE A1
0
c LL CASE A2
0
d LL CASE A3
0
e LL CASE A1
0
f LL CASE A2
0
g LL CASE A9

0
a due to D.L
0
b LL CASE A1
0
c LL CASE A2
0
d LL CASE A3
0
0
0
19
37
-64
0
0
0
343
135
97
0
0
0
59
13
-28
0
0
0
306
-220
-116
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
34
78
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
2
1
6
7
3
0
0
0
1
1
2
6
6
8
19
115
NORMAL
Maximum
Reaction &
Transverse

0
0
e LL CASE A1
0
0
f LL CASE A2
0
0
g LL CASE A9
LOAD COMBINATIONS
515
0
101
1+2(a)+3(a)+3(b)
Maximum
Longitudinal
Moment case
1.300 m.
Transverse Forces
HT (T)
MT (T-m)
0
-228
102
1+2(c)+3(a)+3(c)
532
37
-93
103
1+2(c)+3(a)+3(d)
471
-64
-131
104
1+2(d)+3(a)+3(e)
506
59
78
105
1+2(e)+3(a)+3(f)
514
13
-448
NORMAL
SEISMIC TRANSVERSE
Maximum
Longitudinal
Moment case
Maximum
Reaction &
Transverse
Maximum
Longitudinal
Moment case
106
1+2(f)+3(a)+3(g)
107
101+4(a)+4(b)
108
102+4(a)+4(c)
109
103+4(a)+4(d)
110
104+4(a)+4(e)
111
105+4(a)+4(f)
112
106+4(a)+4(g)
465
-28
-344
445
( 296 )
448
( 299 )
436
( 291 )
443
( 295 )
444
( 296 )
435
( 290 )
0
(0)
0
(0)
0
(0)
0
(0)
0
(0)
0
(0)
4
(3)
7
(5)
-13
-( 9 )
12
(8)
3
(2)
-6
-( 4 )
35
( 24 )
36
( 24 )
35
( 23 )
35
( 23 )
35
( 24 )
36
( 24 )
-76
-( 50 )
-116
-( 77 )
-128
-( 85 )
-83
-( 55 )
-188
-( 125 )
-165
-( 110 )
3.2.2.12 CALCULATION OF LOADS FOR PILE CAP

Area of the pilecap
=(4.300x4.300)
Depth of CG from top
=0.750
Volume of concrete in pier cap
=
18.490 x
=
27.74 m3.
Self wt. of pier cap
=
27.74
x
2.4
=
Height of CG of pile cap
Area (A)
Rectangular area at top
6.450 m2
1.500
66.56 t.
LeverArm (L)
0.750 m
Total
6.450 m2
CG of pier cap from its top = 4.838/6.450
CG of pier cap from its bottom = 1.500 - 0.750
Pier Cap Wt. =
Lever arm (m)

Trans. BM
( T-mBM
)
Long.
( T-mH)T
Total
( T )HL
Total
( T Vert
)
Total
Force ( T )
18.490 m2
0.750 m
=
=
=
=
67 T
AxL
4.838 m3
4.838 m3 4.3
0.750 m
0.750 m
depth =
4.3
CALCULATION OF SEISMIC FORCES ON PILE AT TOP OF THE PILE

PILE CAP
67 t. Trans. seismic force
=
5.2 t.
Long. seismic force
=
7.504 t.
Vert. seismic force
=
13.4 t.
0.750
0.000
0.000
4
0
0
6
0
0
5
8
13
3.2.2.11 SUMMARY OF FORCES AT BASE OF PILE CAP

The Forces at the base of foundation are calculated from the forces at the base of pier by multiplying the horizontal
forces at the base of pier to the depth of footing (lever arm). The self weight of footing is added at the time of design
RTL to GL
7.677 m
SUMMARY OF FORCES ON
PILES
Dist. from top of pier cap to base of pier

=
4.612 m.
Dist. from top of pier cap to base of Pile Cap
=
6.112 m.
Vertical load
Longitudinal Forces
Transverse Forces
HL (T)
ML (T-m)
HT (T)
MT (T-m)
P (T)
514
0
0
0
-228
1 Dead load including SIDL

2 Live Load
a
b
c
d
e
f
g
h
i
88
LL CASE A1
105
LL CASE A2
44
LL CASE A3
88
LL CASE A4
132
LL CASE A5
69
LL CASE A6
69
LL CASE A7
113
LL CASE A8
82
LL CASE A9
79
LL CASE A1
87
LL CASE A2
38
LL CASE A3
62
LL CASE A4
93
LL CASE A5
64
LL CASE A6
128
LL CASE A7
102
LL CASE A8
117
LL CASE A9
a
b
c
d
e
f
g
h
i
4 Braking Forces
0
a LL CASE A1
0
b LL CASE A2
0
c LL CASE A3
0
d LL CASE A4
0
e LL CASE A5
0
f LL CASE A6
0
g LL CASE A7
0
h LL CASE A8
0
i LL CASE A9
a
b
c
d
e
f
g
h
i
6
7
a
a
b
c
d
e
f
g
h
i

0
LL CASE A1
0
LL CASE A2
0
LL CASE A3
0
LL CASE A4
0
LL CASE A5
0
LL CASE A6
0
LL CASE A7
0
LL CASE A8
0
LL CASE A9
0
Water current forces
Seismic in transverse direction
0
due to D.L
0
LL CASE A1
0
LL CASE A2
0
LL CASE A3
0
LL CASE A4
0
LL CASE A5
0
LL CASE A6
0
LL CASE A7
0
LL CASE A8
0
LL CASE A9

7
a LL CASE A1
0
b LL CASE A2
0
c LL CASE A3
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
19
37
-64
-126
-182
-3
-4
-65
-44
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
343
135
97
193
59
263
105
359
439
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
59
66
-28
47
70
48
95
19
30
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
306
-220
-116
136
42
243
98
128
189
10.0
12.5
6.9
8.3
9.7
7.0
8.8
8.4
11.4
89
111
62
74
86
63
78
75
102
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
10.0
12.5
6.9
8.3
9.7
7.0
8.8
8.4
11.4
5.1
89
111
62
74
86
63
78
75
102
26.2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
5.1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
26.2
41.2
201
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1.4
1.6
0.7
1.4
2.1
1.1
1.1
1.8
1.3
12
15
6
12
19
10
10
16
12
0
0
0
0
0
0
1.2
1.4
0.6
12
12
6
0
LL CASE A4
0
LL CASE A5
0
LL CASE A6
0
LL CASE A7
0
LL CASE A8
0
LL CASE A9
Seismic in Longitudinal direction
0
due to D.L
0
b LL CASE A1
0
c LL CASE A2
0
d LL CASE A3
0
e LL CASE A1
0
f LL CASE A2
0
g LL CASE A3
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1.0
1.5
1.0
2.0
1.6
1.8
9
14
9
18
15
17
36.5
161
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0
0
0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0
0
0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0
0
0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0
0
0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
LOAD COMBINATIONS
602
15
134
141
d
e
f
g
h
i
8
a
9 Seismic in Vertical direction

104
a due to D.L
4
a LL CASE A1
4
b LL CASE A2
2
c LL CASE A3
4
d LL CASE A4
5
e LL CASE A5
3
f LL CASE A6
3
g LL CASE A7
5
h LL CASE A8
3
i LL CASE A9
NORMAL
Maximum
Longitudinal
Moment case
Maximum
Reaction &
Transverse
a
b
c
d
e
f
g
h
i

3
LL CASE A1
3
LL CASE A2
2
LL CASE A3
2
LL CASE A4
4
LL CASE A5
3
LL CASE A6
5
LL CASE A7
4
LL CASE A8
5
LL CASE A9
101
1+2(a)+3(a)+4(a)+
5(a)+6
102
1+2(b)+3(a)+4(b)+
5(b)-6
619
122
-5
-119
103
1+2(c)+3(a)+4(c)+
5(c)+6
558
12
25
-105
104
1+2(d)+3(a)+4(d)+
5(d)+6
593
15
174
104
105
1+2(e)+3(a)+4(e)+
5(e)-6
601
151
-5
-474
106
1+2(f)+3(a)+4(f)+5
(f)+6
101 (including LF)
+7(a+b)+30%x8(a
+b)+30%x9(a+b)
102 (including LF) -
552
16
99
-317
564
17
87
48
80
568
17
93
-38
-391
555
17
68
47
25
SEISMIC TRANSVERSE
Maximum
Reaction &
Transverse
107
108
109
7(a+c)+30%x8(a+
c)+30%x9(a+c)
103 (including LF)
+7(a+d)+30%x8(a
+d)+30%x9(a+d)
SEISMIC TRANSVERSE
Maximum
Longitudinal
Moment case
110
111
112
SEISMIC LONGITUDINAL
Maximum
Longitudinal
Moment case
Maximum
Reaction &
Transverse
113
114
115
116
117
118
SEISMIC VERTICAL
Maximum
Longitudinal
Moment case
Maximum
Reaction &
Transverse
119
120
121
122
123
124
104 (including LF)

+7(a+e)+30%x8(a
+e)+30%x9(a+e)
105 (including LF) 7(a+f)+30%x8(a+f)
+30%x9(a+f)
106 (including LF)
+7(a+g)+30%x8(a
+g)+30%x9(a+g)
101 (including LF)
+30%x7(a+b)+8(a
+b)+30%x9(a+b)
102 (including LF)
+30%x7(a+c)+8(a
+c)+30%x9(a+c)
103 (including LF)
+30%7(a+d)+x8(a
+d)+30%x9(a+d)
104 (including LF)
+30%x7(a+e)+8(a
+e)+30%x9(a+e)
105 (including LF)
+30%x7(a+f)+8(a+
f)+30%x9(a+f)
106 (including LF)
+30%x7(a+g)+8(a
+g)+30%x9(a+g)
101 (including LF)
+30%x7(a+b)+30
%x8(a+b)+9(a+b)
102 (including LF)
+30%x7(a+c)+30
%x8(a+c)+9(a+c)
103 (including LF)
+30%7(a+d)+30%
x8(a+d)+9(a+d)
104 (including LF)
+30%x7(a+e)+30
%x8(a+e)+9(a+e)
105 (including LF)
+30%x7(a+f)+30%
x8(a+f)+9(a+f)
106 (including LF)
+30%x7(a+g)+30
%x8(a+g)+9(a+g)
569
17
95
48
72
564
17
99
-38
-459
555
17
79
47
-18
564
43
200
18
-69
568
43
206
18
-110
555
42
181
18
-120
564
43
208
18
-77
564
43
211
18
-182
555
43
192
18
-163
640
17
87
18
-69
644
17
93
18
-110
629
17
68
18
-120
640
17
95
18
-77
639
17
99
18
-182
631
17
79
18
-163
3.2.3
Design of Circular Pier Cross-section at Base For Pier P13

Y
X
Diameter "D"
Radius
0.9 m
Clear Cover
Diameter of Transverse Reinforcement
Effective Cover
=75/1000+16/1000+0.02/2
75 mm
16 mm
0.101 m
No of bars
Diameter of bar
38 Nos.
0.02 m
Code of Practise
Modular Ratio m
IRC
10
Grade of Concrete
Permissible Stresses in Concrete for Direct Compression
Permissible Stresses in Concrete for bending Compression
Permissible Stresses in Steel for Compression
Permissible Stresses in Steel for Tension
Area of concrete
Area of Steel
Percentage of Steel
Area of concrete to resist axial load only =
M45
11.25
15.00
205
240
2.545
11938
0.47
501526 mm2
56410000 / 11.25
Minimum Area of Reinforcement

0.8 % of area above
=0.8/100501526
0.4 % of gross area pile =0.4/1002.5451000000
4012 mm2
10179 mm2
10179 mm2
Minimum area of reinforcement

Load
Case
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
P
(T)
535
552
491
526
534
564
329
331
323
328
329
332
329
331
323
328
329
332
373
376
366
371
373
375
MT
(T-m)
101
121
-4
141
150
91
43
46
30
48
50
43
113
116
100
118
120
113
43
46
30
48
50
43
ML
(T-m)
123
-101
-123
86
-456
-30
35
-266
-2
29
-311
12
-60
-87
-94
-65
-135
-81
-60
-87
-94
-65
-135
-81
M=(MT2+ML2)0.5 s CONCRETE s ST COMP

2
(T-m)
160
158
123
166
480
96
55
270
30
56
315
45
128
145
137
135
181
139
74
99
99
81
144
92
N/mm2
N/mm2
N/mm2
N/mm2
m2
mm2
%
(N/mm ) (N/mm )
#NAME? #NAME?
#NAME? #NAME?
#NAME? #NAME?
#NAME? #NAME?
#NAME? #NAME?
#NAME? #NAME?
#NAME? #NAME?
#NAME? #NAME?
#NAME? #NAME?
#NAME? #NAME?
#NAME? #NAME?
#NAME? #NAME?
#NAME? #NAME?
#NAME? #NAME?
#NAME? #NAME?
#NAME? #NAME?
#NAME? #NAME?
#NAME? #NAME?
#NAME? #NAME?
#NAME? #NAME?
#NAME? #NAME?
#NAME? #NAME?
#NAME? #NAME?
#NAME? #NAME?
s ST TENSION
2
Steel Prov > Min reqd
scbc
ssc, all
2
(N/mm )
(N/mm )
#NAME?
15.00
#NAME?
15.00
#NAME?
15.00
#NAME?
15.00
#NAME?
15.00
#NAME?
15.00
#NAME?
15.00
#NAME?
15.00
#NAME?
15.00
#NAME?
15.00
#NAME?
15.00
#NAME?
15.00
#NAME?
15.00
#NAME?
15.00
#NAME?
15.00
#NAME?
15.00
#NAME?
15.00
#NAME?
15.00
#NAME?
15.00
#NAME?
15.00
#NAME?
15.00
#NAME?
15.00
#NAME?
15.00
#NAME?
15.00
(N/mm )
205.0
205.0
205.0
205.0
205.0
205.0
205.0
205.0
205.0
205.0
205.0
205.0
205.0
205.0
205.0
205.0
205.0
205.0
205.0
205.0
205.0
205.0
205.0
205.0
sst, all
(N/mm2)
-240.0
-240.0
-240.0
-240.0
-240.0
-240.0
-240.0
-240.0
-240.0
-240.0
-240.0
-240.0
-240.0
-240.0
-240.0
-240.0
-240.0
-240.0
-240.0
-240.0
-240.0
-240.0
-240.0
-240.0
Ductile detailing for Pier

Calculation for Lateral tie for Pier
Lateral Tie - up to 1.8m below pier cap bottom and above pile cap top level
Check for adequacy of diameter of stirrups as per IS- 13920:1993 for Pier
(Reference Cl: 7.4.7of IS: 13920 - 1993)
Area of cross section of bar forming circular hoops, A sh calculated must be less than the Cross sectional area
Ash
=
0.09 S Dk (fck / fy) (Ag/Ak-1)
Ash
=
Cross sectional area of bar
S
Dk
Ag
AK
=
=
=
=
Spacing of hoops
Diameter of core measured to outside of hoop
Gross area of column cross section
Area of the concrete core = /4 DK2
Diameter of Pier
Spacing of Lateral ties, S
Clear cover for column
Dk
AK
Ag
fck
fy
Ash
=
=
=
=1800-75-75
=3.1416501650/4
=3.1418001800/4
=0.09751650(45/500)((2.54E+06/2.14E+06)-1)
Diameter of Lateral tie

Cross sectional Area of Lateral tie bar
1800 mm
75 mm
75 mm
=
=
=
=
=
=
1650
2.14E+06
2.54E+06
M45
500
191
=
=
16 mm
2
201 mm
Hence OK
Hence provide confined reinforcement of 16 mm diameter bars at 75 mm C/C for a distance

Lateral Tie - beyond 1.8m below pier cap bottom and above pile cap top level
As per Cl. 306.3.3 of IRC: 21 -2000
Maximum spacing of ties is 12 times the size of smallest compression bar.
Diameter of smallest compression bar
=
12 times of smallest compression bar
=
20
240
Hence provide 8mm diameter bar at 200mm C/C below 1200mm from pile top
mm
mm2
mm2
Mpa
Mpa
mm2
3.2.4 DESIGN OF PILE FOUNDATION FOR EJ PIER P13

No. of piles
Minimum Thickness of Pile cap
Thickness of pile cap
Pile offset from edge
Pile diameter
=
=
=
=
=
4
1.5
1.5
0.15
1
Area of pile
Pier Size
Pile cap top below G.L
Density of soil above
=
=
=
=
0.785
1.8
0.000
1.8
Wt. of soil above pile cap
Wt. of pile cap
Fixity depth
Total Length of pile
Submerged density
=
=
=
Vertical Capacity of one pile

25 % increase
=
=
Maximum Pile Load

Minimum Pile Load
=
=
3.2.4.1
4.3
m
m
m
m
OK
P4
m2
m dia
m
Traffic
4.3
t/m3
0 T
ML
P2
m.
m
t/m3
0.65
T (Normal)
T (Seismic)
Normal
Seismic
223 T
220 T
115 T
100 T
SAFE
SAFE
Load due to MT
ML
1.50
4
MT
2.250
1.50
2.250
=
=
=
=
Max. horizontal load on pile
ML
ML = Moment along longitudinal direction
6.00
MT
MT = Moment along transverse direction
6.00
Horizontal Capacity of Piles

25 % increase
Calculation of loads on piles for each load combination
Load due to ML
1.5
P1
67 T
9.282
17
1.4
1.4
350
438
P3
1.5
MT
11.5 T (Normal)
14.4 T (Seismic)
Normal
4.3
Seismic
12.7 T
SAFE
3.2.4.2
Calculation of loads on piles for each load combination

Load due to Load due to
ML
(T- MT
(Tm)
m)
MT
(T-m)
Self wt.of pile

(T)
Add.load
(pile
cap+soil)
P/n
(T)
141
19
151
22
-5
-119
19
155
20
-105
19
140
174
104
19
148
151
-5
-474
19
552
16
99
-317
19
107
564
17
87
48
80
108
568
17
93
-38
109
555
17
68
110
569
17
111
564
112
Load
no.
Vertical load
P (T)
HL
(T)
ML
(T-m)
101
602
15
134
102
619
122
103
558
12
25
104
593
15
105
601
106
HT
(T)
Resultant
BM for pile
H per
(T-m)
pile(T)
Max. load
(T)
Min. load
(T)
24
215
123
18
-20
174
173
10
-17
172
145
15
29
17
213
121
18
150
25
-79
223
115
10
138
17
-53
193
120
20
19
141
15
13
188
132
13
59
-391
19
142
15
-65
210
111
10
48
47
25
19
139
11
173
142
12
58
95
48
72
19
142
16
12
189
133
13
59
17
99
-38
-459
19
141
16
-76
220
100
10
48
555
17
79
47
-18
19
139
13
-3
167
147
12
58
113
564
43
200
18
-69
19
141
33
-12
182
138
12
54
114
568
43
206
18
-110
19
142
34
-18
177
145
12
54
115
555
42
181
18
-120
19
139
30
-20
167
147
11
53
116
564
43
208
18
-77
19
141
35
-13
182
138
12
54
117
564
43
211
18
-182
19
141
35
-30
165
155
12
54
118
555
43
192
18
-163
19
139
32
-27
162
153
12
54
119
640
17
87
18
-69
19
160
15
-12
182
176
29
120
644
17
93
18
-110
19
161
15
-18
182
177
29
121
629
17
68
18
-120
19
157
11
-20
185
167
28
122
640
17
95
18
-77
19
160
16
-13
182
176
29
123
639
17
99
18
-182
19
160
16
-30
192
165
29
124
631
17
79
18
-163
19
158
13
-27
190
162
29
3.2.4.3
Load
no.
Calculation for Design Loads in Pile cap

Vertical load in Each Pile (T) due to P, ML & MT
2-way
Shear (T)
Vertical Load in Pile Groups (T)
P1
P2
P3
P4
P1+P2
P3+P4
P1+P4
P2+P3
SP
101
196
149
105
152
346
256
348
254
602
102
155
195
154
115
350
115
155
310
619
103
126
161
153
118
287
118
126
279
558
104
195
160
102
137
355
137
195
297
593
105
96
255
204
46
351
46
96
301
601
106
102
208
174
69
309
69
102
276
552
107
169
142
113
140
311
140
169
282
564
108
92
223
192
61
315
61
92
284
568
109
154
146
123
132
300
132
154
277
555
110
170
146
114
138
316
138
170
285
569
111
81
234
201
48
315
48
81
282
564
112
149
155
129
122
304
122
149
277
555
113
163
186
119
96
349
96
163
282
564
114
158
195
126
89
352
89
158
284
568
115
149
189
129
89
338
89
149
277
555
116
163
189
119
94
351
94
163
282
564
117
146
207
136
75
352
75
146
282
564
118
143
198
134
80
341
80
143
277
555
119
163
186
157
134
349
134
163
320
640
120
158
195
164
127
353
127
158
322
644
121
149
189
166
126
337
126
149
315
629
122
163
189
157
131
352
131
163
320
640
123
146
207
174
113
353
113
146
320
639
124
144
198
172
117
342
117
144
315
631
MT
Max. Shear
1-way Shear
2-way Shear
At A - A'
At B - B'
Normal
348
355
Seismic
170
353
( 113 )
( 235 )
B
P2
P3
For Pier
For Pile P1
Normal
619
196
Seismic
644
170
( 429 )
( 113 )
0.6
1.5
0.6
ML
1.8
A
A'
1.8
Max BM
Pier
P4
3.2.4.4
Normal
209
213
T-m
Seismic
102
212
T-m
( 68 )
( 141 )
T-m
P1
1.5
B'
Design constants
Grade of steel
Permissible stress in steel, sst
Fe500
240 MPa
2
Grade of concrete
M35
Permissible stress in concrete, scbc
1167 T/m
Modular Ratio, m
10
0.327
Clear Cover
0.075 m
0.891
170.0 T/m2
Dimension
Length (m)
Along Traffic Direction (A-A')
4.3
Across Traffic Direction (B-B')
4.3
Depth (m)
1.5
Design Loads
24000 T/m2
2-way Shear (T)
BM (T-m)
1-way Shear (T)
From pier face (m)
209
348
0.6
213
355
0.6
For Pier
For Pile
619
196
3.2.4.5
Check for Flexure
3.2.4.5.1 Across Traffic Direction (B-B')

deff.reqd =
213
170.0
0.540
4.3
Effective cover
deff provided
Ast reqd
Minimum reinforcement
Provide
0.2
% of cross sectional area

29 nos. f
1 layer of
25 f bars
0.075
1.5
0 +
0.025
0.5
0.088
24000 x
(Cl. 305.19 of IRC: 21 -2000)
0.891 x
0.20% x
14235
0 =
0.088 m
1.413 m
>
0.540 m
= 0.00705 m2
7047
0.0121 m2
12148 mm2
213
1.413
1.413 x
4.3 =
12148
0.025
mm2
Ast provided
Clear Spacing
= (4.3-2(0.075+0)-2925/1000)/(29-1)1000
122 mm
C/c Spacing
147 mm
Effective cover
deff.provided
mm
122 +
>
mm
OK
OK
25
3.2.4.5.2 Along Traffic Direction (A-A')

deff.reqd =
209
170.0
0.535
4.3
Ast reqd
Provide
3.2.4.6
1 layer of
0.2
% of cross sectional area

29 nos. f
25 f bars
0.075
1.5
0.025
0.113
209
=
24000 x
(Cl. 305.19 of IRC: 21 -2000)
=
14235
0.891 x
0.20% x
2
1.388
1.388 x
0.5
0.113
1.388 m
>
= 0.00704 m2
0.0119 m2
11933 mm2
4.3 =
11933
0.025
0.535 m
7041
Ast provided
Clear Spacing
= (4.3-2(0.075+0+25/1000)-2925/1000)/(29-1)1000
122 mm
C/c Spacing
147 mm
122
mm
+
>
mm
25
3.2.4.6.1 Across Traffic Direction (B-B')

=
From Table 12B of IRC: 21- 2000, for
100 x Ast / bd
From Cl. 304.7.1.4 of IRC: 21-2000
Vs
=
0
0.6 m
0.234
22.5
<
and M
4.3
1.413 m
Hence one-way shear =

tc
35 grade of concrete
x
1.413
-137 T
0.225 MPa
0 T
=
22.5 T/m2
(No shear reinforcement required)
3.2.4.6.2 Along Traffic Direction (A-A')

Distance betweeen pier face and centre line pile
From Table 12B of IRC: 21- 2000, for
100 x Ast / bd
From Cl. 304.7.1.4 of IRC: 21-2000
Vs
=
0
0.6 m
0.239
22.7
<
and M
4.3
1.388 m
Hence one-way shear =
35 grade of concrete
x
1.388
-135 T
tc
mm2
OK
Check for 1-way Shear
Distance betweeen pier face and centre line pile
OK
0.227 MPa
0 T
=
22.7 T/m2
(No shear reinforcement required)
3.2.4.7
Check for 2-way Shear

Permissble stress for 2-way shear (from Cl307.2.5.5 of IRC: 21- 2000)
Effective depth
Location section
1.388 /
0.16 x
1.388 m
0.694 m from pier/pile qace
35
0.95 MPa =
95 T/m2
(minimum of the depths along two repective directions being considered)
3.2.4.7.1 For Pier
1.8
0.694
Perimeter of region for resisting 2-way shear for Pier =

Area of region for resisting 2-way shear for Pier
3.14
x(
1.388 x
1.8 +
2 x
0.694 )= 10.015 m
10.015
Punching Shear force

Punching shear stress
619
45 T/m2
<
95
13.9 m2
619 T
Pier
Pile cap
T/m2
13.9
OK
3.2.4.7.2 For Pile P1
Since it is a pile at the corner of the pile cap
Perimeter
3.14
Area available for resisting 2-way shear for Pier

Punching Shear force =
Punching shear stress =
196
196
7.4
2
=
x
5.322
0.694 /
x
1.388
<
95
)=
5.3
7.4 m2
Pile cap
T
=
Pile
27
T/m2
T/m2
OK
0.694
3.2.5
Design of Circular Pile for EJ Pier P13
MY
X
Diameter "D"
Radius
0.5 m
Clear Cover
Diameter of Transverse Reinforcement
Effective Cover
=75/1000+16/1000+0.016/2
75 mm
16 mm
0.099 m
No of bars
Diameter of bar
16 Nos.
0.016 m
Code of Practise
Modular Ratio m
IRC
10
Grade of Concrete
Permissible Stresses in Concrete for Direct Compression
Permissible Stresses in Concrete for bending Compression
Permissible Stresses in Steel for Compression
Permissible Stresses in Steel for Tension
Allowable increase in perm. Stresses for earthquake cases
Area of concrete
Area of Steel
Percentage of Steel
Area of concrete to resist axial load only =
22310000 / 8.75
Minimum Area of Reinforcement

0.8 % of area above
=0.8/100254677
0.4 % of gross area pile =0.4/1000.7851000000
Max. Vertical Load Cases
Minimum area of reinforcement

Load
Case
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
(T)
215
174
172
213
223
193
188
210
173
189
220
167
182
177
167
182
165
162
182
182
185
182
192
190
MY
s CONCRETE s ST COMP
(T-m)
(N/mm2) (N/mm2)
18 #NAME? #NAME?
10 #NAME? #NAME?
15 #NAME? #NAME?
18 #NAME? #NAME?
10 #NAME? #NAME?
20 #NAME? #NAME?
59 #NAME? #NAME?
48 #NAME? #NAME?
58 #NAME? #NAME?
59 #NAME? #NAME?
48 #NAME? #NAME?
58 #NAME? #NAME?
54 #NAME? #NAME?
54 #NAME? #NAME?
53 #NAME? #NAME?
54 #NAME? #NAME?
54 #NAME? #NAME?
54 #NAME? #NAME?
29 #NAME? #NAME?
29 #NAME? #NAME?
28 #NAME? #NAME?
29 #NAME? #NAME?
29 #NAME? #NAME?
29 #NAME? #NAME?
M35
8.75
11.67
205
240
50
0.785
3217
0.41
N/mm2
N/mm2
N/mm2
N/mm2
%
m2
mm2
%
254677 mm2
2037 mm2
3142 mm2
3142 mm2
s ST TENSION
scbc
(N/mm2)
(N/mm2)
#NAME?
11.67
#NAME?
11.67
#NAME?
11.67
#NAME?
11.67
#NAME?
11.67
#NAME?
11.67
#NAME?
17.50
#NAME?
17.50
#NAME?
17.50
#NAME?
17.50
#NAME?
17.50
#NAME?
17.50
#NAME?
17.50
#NAME?
17.50
#NAME?
17.50
#NAME?
17.50
#NAME?
17.50
#NAME?
17.50
#NAME?
17.50
#NAME?
17.50
#NAME?
17.50
#NAME?
17.50
#NAME?
17.50
#NAME?
17.50
Steel Prov > Min reqd
ssc, all
sst, all
(N/mm2)
205.0
205.0
205.0
205.0
205.0
205.0
307.5
307.5
307.5
307.5
307.5
307.5
307.5
307.5
307.5
307.5
307.5
307.5
307.5
307.5
307.5
307.5
307.5
307.5
(N/mm2)
-240.0
-240.0
-240.0
-240.0
-240.0
-240.0
-360.0
-360.0
-360.0
-360.0
-360.0
-360.0
-360.0
-360.0
-360.0
-360.0
-360.0
-360.0
-360.0
-360.0
-360.0
-360.0
-360.0
-360.0
Minimum Verical Load Cases
Load
Case
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
(T)
123
173
145
121
115
120
132
111
142
133
100
147
138
145
147
138
155
153
176
177
167
176
165
162
MY
s CONCRETE s ST COMP
s ST TENSION
(T-m)
(N/mm2) (N/mm2)
18 #NAME? #NAME?
10 #NAME? #NAME?
15 #NAME? #NAME?
18 #NAME? #NAME?
10 #NAME? #NAME?
20 #NAME? #NAME?
59 #NAME? #NAME?
48 #NAME? #NAME?
58 #NAME? #NAME?
59 #NAME? #NAME?
48 #NAME? #NAME?
58 #NAME? #NAME?
54 #NAME? #NAME?
54 #NAME? #NAME?
53 #NAME? #NAME?
54 #NAME? #NAME?
54 #NAME? #NAME?
54 #NAME? #NAME?
29 #NAME? #NAME?
29 #NAME? #NAME?
28 #NAME? #NAME?
29 #NAME? #NAME?
29 #NAME? #NAME?
29 #NAME? #NAME?
scbc
(N/mm2)
(N/mm2)
#NAME?
11.67
#NAME?
11.67
#NAME?
11.67
#NAME?
11.67
#NAME?
11.67
#NAME?
11.67
#NAME?
17.50
#NAME?
17.50
#NAME?
17.50
#NAME?
17.50
#NAME?
17.50
#NAME?
17.50
#NAME?
17.50
#NAME?
17.50
#NAME?
17.50
#NAME?
17.50
#NAME?
17.50
#NAME?
17.50
#NAME?
17.50
#NAME?
17.50
#NAME?
17.50
#NAME?
17.50
#NAME?
17.50
#NAME?
17.50
ssc, all
sst, all
(N/mm2)
205.0
205.0
205.0
205.0
205.0
205.0
307.5
307.5
307.5
307.5
307.5
307.5
307.5
307.5
307.5
307.5
307.5
307.5
307.5
307.5
307.5
307.5
307.5
307.5
(N/mm2)
-240.0
-240.0
-240.0
-240.0
-240.0
-240.0
-360.0
-360.0
-360.0
-360.0
-360.0
-360.0
-360.0
-360.0
-360.0
-360.0
-360.0
-360.0
-360.0
-360.0
-360.0
-360.0
-360.0
-360.0
Ductile detailing for Pile

Calculation for Lateral tie for Pile
Lateral Tie - up to 1.0m below pile cap bottom level
Check for adequacy of diameter of stirrups as per IS- 13920:1993 for pile
7.4.7ofhoops,
IS: 13920
- 1993) must be less than the Cross sectional
Area of cross section of(Reference
bar formingCl:circular
A sh calculated
area of Lateral tie bar used in the Pile
Ash
=
0.09 S Dk (fck / fy) (Ag/Ak-1)
Ash
Cross sectional area of bar
S
Dk
=
=
Spacing of hoops
Diameter of core measured to outside of hoop
Ag
AK
Gross area of column cross section

Area of the concrete core = /4 DK2
Diameter of Pier
1000 mm
Spacing of Lateral ties, S
90 mm
Clear cover for column
75 mm
Dk =1000-75-75
AK =3.14850850/4
Ag =3.1410001000/4
=
=
850 mm
2
5.67E+05 mm
2
7.85E+05 mm
fck
M35 Mpa
fy
500 Mpa
2
185 mm
Ash =0.0990850(35/500)((7.85E+05/5.67E+05)-1)
Diameter of Lateral tie
16 mm
Cross sectional Area of Lateral tie bar
2
201 mm
Hence OK
Hence provide confined reinforcement of 16 mm diameter bars at 90 mm C/C for a
distance D (Diameter of pier) from top & bottom of the pier
Lateral Tie - beyond 1.0m below pile cap bottom level
As per Cl. 306.3.3 of IRC: 21 -2000
Maximum spacing of ties is 12 times the size of smallest compression bar.
Diameter of smallest compression bar
16
12 times of smallest compression bar
192
Hence provide 8mm diameter bar at 200mm C/C below 1200mm from pile top
3.2.6
Design of Pier Cap For Pier P13

As per Cl. 305.5.3of IRC:21-2000 total depth
A
500
=
=
=
B
C
500 + minimum of
500 +
800
1300 mm.
800
&
4000 3
800
D
Pier Centre Line
Depth of pier cap CG from top of pier cap
=
[4000500500/2+4000800/2(500+800/3)]/(4000500+4000800/2)
=
480 mm
Elevation
900
Horizontal distance of Pier cap CG from pier face

=
4000/3(1300+2500)/(1300+500)
=
1704 mm
4000
Concrete unit weight

500
4500
2500
BL4
BL5
BL6
BR5
BR6
Increase SW by
Plan
500
2500
4500
24 kN/m2
Self weight (SW) of pier cap

=
4000(500+1300)/22300/10^924
=
198.7 kN
2300
BR4
10 % to include weight of bearing pedestal etc.
Shear due to self weight, Vsw

=
198.7(1+10/100)
=
218.57 kN
Bending Moment at pier face due to SW, Msw
=
218.571.704
=
372.4 kNm
Bearing Mark
BL6
BL5
3.6
3.6
Lever arm from face of pier along transverse direction

W
(kN)
A
B
DL
SIDL
LL
(For bending moment in pier cap)
LL case A1 for BL6, BL5, BL4, BR6, BR5 & BR4
LL case A3 for BL6 , BL5, BL4 , BR6, BR5 & BR4
(For torsional moment in pier cap)
LL case B1 for BL6, BL5, BL4, BR6, BR5 & BR4
LL case B3 for BL6 , BL5, BL4, BR6, BR5 & BR4
(including 0% increase)
4.5/(6+22.25)100=
Impact
BL4
1.6
1.6
H
(kN)
T
(kNm)
237
281.186
853.2
1012.3
-3.43
114.62
-6.4
-12.3
412.6
-22.9
0
0
0
0.0
0.0
0.0
16.0 %
-0.5
18.3
-1
-2
66 |
-3.7
0
0
0
0
0
0
= mW
(For elestomeric bearing only LL is considered)
Bearing Friction
0
Friction co-efficient, m =
horizontal force due to change in tempreture =
0.00 kn
0.00
ecc. =
0.35 m
torsional moment developed in per cap =
0 kn-m
DL
0237(0.350+0.480)=
SIDL
0281.186(0.350+0.480)=
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
W
H
(kN)
(kN)
240
85.391
0
0
0
M
384.0
136.6
2.299
216.3
44.9
3.7
346.1
71.9
0
0
0
0.0
0.0
0.0
16.0 %
0.4
34.6
7.2
0.6
55.4
11.5
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
-0.4
0
0
0
0
0.00
0240(0.350+0.480)=
085.391(0.350+0.480)=
0
0
0
0
0
0
T
(kNm)
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
W
H
(kN)
(kN)
240
56.908
T
(kNm)
0.0
0.0
-9.502
88.0
122.5
0.0
0.0
0.0
0
0
0
0.0
0.0
0.0
16.0 %
-1.5
14.1
19.6
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0.00
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Bearing Mark
BL6
BL5
3.6
3.6

W
(kN)
F
Braking Force
Centrifugal Force
= Wv2/127R
Design Speed, v =
Radius of curvature, R =
BL4
1.6
1.6
H
(kN)
T
(kNm)
W
(kN)
-0.4
0
H
(kN)
T
(kNm)
W
(kN)
H
(kN)
T
(kNm)
20.0
25.0
13.9
0.0
0.0
0.0
16.6
20.8
11.5
20.0
25.0
13.9
0.0
0.0
0.0
16.6
20.8
11.5
20.0
25.0
13.9
0.0
0.0
0.0
16.6
20.8
11.5
16.6
19.4
14.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
13.8
16.1
11.6
16.6
19.4
14.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
13.8
16.1
11.6
16.6
19.4
14.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
13.8
16.1
11.6
100 kmph
1000000
0
0
0
m
=-3.427100^2/127/1000000
=114.62100^2/127/1000000
=-6.352100^2/127/1000000
1000000
0
0
0
m
=2.299100^2/127/1000000
=216.322100^2/127/1000000
=44.932100^2/127/1000000
Total Reaction at each bearing for load combination = DL+SIDL+LL+Impact+Bearing Friction+Braking Force+Centrifugal Force
514.3
1851.1
16.6
328.1
524.9
651.1
2344.1
20.8
576.3
922.1
510.8
1838.9
11.50
327.3
604.0
518.2
1865.5
13.8
325.4
520.6
518.2
1865.5
16.1
325.4
520.6
518.2
1865.5
11.6
325.4
520.6
1000000
0
0
0
m
=-9.502100^2/127/1000000
=87.973100^2/127/1000000
=122.4585100^2/127/1000000
16.6
20.8
11.50
285.9
478.5
382.6
0.0
25.0
0.0
16.6
20.8
11.50
13.8
16.1
11.6
296.9
296.9
296.9
0.0
19.4
0.0
13.8
16.1
11.6
Bearing Mark
BR6
A
B
DL
SIDL
LL
4.5/(6+22.25)100=
Impact
BR5
3.6
3.6
W
H
(kN)
(kN)
237
281.186
BR4
1.6
1.6
853.2
1012.3
T
(kNm)
0
0
-6.7
159.5
1.8
-24.1
574.2
6.3
-2.44
33.65
6.08
-2.45
322.33
-30.18
-3.9
515.7
-48.3
-3.56
79.51
-56.34
-14.6
221.1
209.3
-52.7
796.0
753.5
-10.98
165.8
-7.85
-2.62
425.77
36.23
-4.2
681.2
58.0
-1.96
319.33
-7.85
-3.9
91.9
1
-0.4
5.4
1
16.0 %
-0.4
51.6
-4.8
-0.6
82.5
-7.7
-0.6
12.7
-9
-8.4
127.4
120.6
-1.8
26.5
-1.3
-0.4
68.1
5.8
-0.7
109
9.3
-0.3
51.1
-1.3
16.0 %
-1.1
25.5
0.3
-2.3
35.4
33.5
-0.4
0

Bearing Friction
mW
0
0.00 kn
0.00
ecc. =
0.00 m
0 kn-m
DL
0237.0(0.350+0.480)=
SIDL
0281.2(0.350+0.480)=
0
0
0
0
0
0
W
H
(kN)
(kN)
240
85.391
M
384.0
136.6
0
0
T
(kNm)
0.00
0240.0(0.350+0.480)=
085.4(0.350+0.480)=
W
H
(kN)
(kN)
240
56.908
0.0
0.0
T
(kNm)
0
0
-3.11
149.43
-24.94
0.0
0.0
0.0
4.79
46.09
-110.55
-1.38
213.03
125.91
0.0
0.0
0.0
-1.04
159.77
94.43
16.0 %
-0.5
23.9
-4
0
0
0
0.8
7.4
-17.7
-0.2
34.1
20.1
0
0
0
-0.2
25.6
15.1
0.0
0.0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0.0
0.0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0.00
0240.0(0.350+0.480)=
056.9(0.350+0.480)=
0
0
0
0
0
0
0.0
0.0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Bearing Mark
BR6
3.6
3.6
W
(kN)
0^2/127/1000000
Braking Force
Centrifugal Force
Design Speed, v =
Total Reaction at each bearing for load combination

BR5
1000000
0
0
0
BR4
1.6
1.6
H
(kN)
T
(kNm)
W
(kN)
-0.4
0
H
(kN)
T
(kNm)
W
(kN)
H
(kN)
T
(kNm)
20.0
25.0
13.9
0.0
0.0
0.0
16.6
20.8
11.5
20.00
25.00
13.85
0.0
0.0
0.0
16.6
20.8
11.5
20.0
25.0
13.9
0.0
0.0
0.0
16.6
20.8
11.5
16.6
19.4
14.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
13.8
16.1
11.6
16.62
19.39
14.00
0.0
0.0
0.0
13.8
16.1
11.6
16.6
19.4
14.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
13.8
16.1
11.6
m
=-6.686100^2/127/1000000
=159.491100^2/127/1000000
=1.751100^2/127/1000000
=
510.4
703.2
520.2
1837.5
2531.5
1872.8
13.4
59.80
18.57
322.54
699.323
290.41
501.2
774.7
761.0
1804.3
2788.9
2739.6
1.0
208.4
2.5
322.38
819.26
367.42
DL+SIDL+LL+Impact+Bearing Friction+Braking Force+Centrifugal Force

516.11
12.44
293.29
0.00
22.19
1118.86
112.96
470.239
0.00
74.24
464.64
-53.8
267.97
0.00
-116.8
515.74
1310.86
587.89
14.3
370.4
2.3
295.33
544.04
442.91
0.00
0.00
0.00
12.6
185.4
121.1
Design forces
Bending Moment at the face of the pier
From CL 304.7.1.1.2 of IRC: 21 - 2000

tan b
Effective depth
(due to reactions from all above bearings)

M
514.2593.6+328.091.6+510.43.6+322.5431.6
=
4729.8 kNm
651.1063.6+576.3131.6+703.1773.6+699.3231.6
=
6916.4 kNm
510.8343.6+327.2651251.6+520.2373.6+290.40951.6
=
4700.1 kNm
518.1863.6+325.3911.6+501.243.6+322.3761.6
=
518.1863.6+325.3911.6+774.6963.6+819.2621.6
=
518.1863.6+325.3911.6+760.9963.6+367.4181.6
=
4706.4 kNm
6485.8 kNm
5713.5 kNm
V = W - Md tanb / d
0.2 =800/4000
1.212 m
Bending Moment at a distance equal to effective depth from pier face

Md
(due to reactions from BR5,BR6 + BL5 BL6 alone)
=(510.4(3.6-1.212)+322.54(1.6-1.212)+514.3(3.6-1.212)+328.1(1.6-1.212))
2699.3 kNm
=(703.2(3.6-1.212)+699.32(1.6-1.212)+651.1(3.6-1.212)+576.3(1.6-1.212))
3729.0 kNm
=(520.2(3.6-1.212)+290.41(1.6-1.212)+510.8(3.6-1.212)+327.3(1.6-1.212))
2701.9 kNm
Shear at a distance equal to effective depth from pier face


V
=(510.4+322.54+514.3+328.1-2699.30.2/1.212)
1229.9 kN
=(703.2+699.32+651.1+576.3-3729.00.2/1.212)
2014.6 kN
=(520.2+290.41+510.8+327.3-2701.90.2/1.212)
1202.9 kN
Torsion at a distance equal to effective depth from pier face

=(501.2(3.6-1.212)+322.38(1.6-1.212)+518.2(3.6-1.212)+325.4(1.6-1.212))
2685.7 kNm
=(774.7(3.6-1.212)+819.26(1.6-1.212)+518.2(3.6-1.212)+325.4(1.6-1.212))
3531.5 kNm
=(761.0(3.6-1.212)+367.42(1.6-1.212)+518.2(3.6-1.212)+325.4(1.6-1.212))
3323.5 kNm
=(501.2+322.38+518.2+325.4-2685.70.2/1.212)
=(774.7+819.26+518.2+325.4-3531.50.2/1.212)
=(761.0+367.42+518.2+325.4-3323.50.2/1.212)
1224.0 kN
1854.8 kN
1423.6 kN
(due to reactions from BR5,BR6 alone)

25.8 kNm
172.8 kNm
-35.3 kNm
15.3 kNm
578.9 kNm
4.8 kNm
From CL 304.7.2.4.2 of IRC: 21 - 2000

Mt
= T(1+D/b)/1.7
Me
= Msw+M+Mt
25.7955(1+1300/2300)/1.7=
172.76075(1+1300/2300)/1.7=
-35.266875(1+1300/2300)/1.7=
23.8 kNm
159.1 kNm
-32.5 kNm
15.34885(1+1300/2300)/1.7=
578.85445(1+1300/2300)/1.7=
4.824(1+1300/2300)/1.7=
14.1 kNm
533 kNm
4.4 kNm
372.4+4729.8+23.8=
372.4+6916.4+159.1=
372.4+4700.1+-32.5=
5126.0 kNm
7447.9 kNm
5040.0 kNm
372.4+4706.4+14.1=
372.4+6485.8+533=
372.4+5713.5+4.4=
5092.9 kNm
7391.2 kNm
6090.3 kNm
1.625.7955/2.3=
1.6172.76075/2.3=
1.6-35.266875/2.3=
17.9 kN
120.2 kN
-24.5 kN
1.615.34885/2.3=
1.6578.85445/2.3=
1.64.824/2.3=
10.7 kN
402.7 kN
3.4 kN
From CL 304.7.2.3 of IRC: 21 - 2000

Vt
= 1.6 T/b
Ve
= Vsw+V+Vt
218.57+1229.857793+17.9=
218.57+2014.576661+120.2=
218.57+1202.894915+-24.5=
1466.3 kN
2353.3 kN
1397.0 kN
218.57+1224.004405+10.7=
218.57+1854.774673+402.7=
218.57+1423.559233+3.4=
1453.3 kN
2476.0 kN
1645.5 kN
Design Parameters
Grade of concrete
M45
15.0 MPa
Permissible tensile stress in steel in flexure, sst
240 MPa
k
j
Q
= 1015.0/(1015.0+240)
= 1-0.385/3
= 0.3850.87215.0/2
=
=
=
Clear Cover
Dia. of spacer bars will be used if required
Grade of steel
Modular Ratio m
Permissible stress in steel in shear, ss
0.385
0.872
2.515
=
=
Fe500
10
200
Total depth, D
Total depth at a distance equal to effective depth from pier face, D d
=
1300-(1300-500)/40001212
Width, b
40 mm
32 mm
1300
=
1058
2300
Maximum Bending Moment

Maximum Shear
7447.9
2476.0
Provide
f
f
f
Main reinforcement
32
32
0
,
,
,
25
13
0
Nos. in
Nos. in
Nos. in
1 st layer
2 nd layer
3 nd layer
Total reinforcement provided

Transverse reinforcement
10
10 lgd. stps. at
=
=
=
20096 mm2 steel at

10450 mm2 steel at
0 mm2 steel at
66 mm depth from top

30546 mm2 steel at
200 mm. c/c.
785 mm2
Effective cover
= (2009666+10450130+0178)/(20096+10450+0)
88 mm.
Effective depth provided
= 1300-88
1212 mm.
= [7447.910^6/(2.5152300)]^0.5
1134.8 mm
Check for Flexure

Effective depth required
Reinforcement required
=7447.910^6/(2400.87212122300)
@
0.2 % as per Cl. 305.19 of IRC: 6 -2010
29370 mm
5575.2 mm2
SAFE
<
30546 mm
SAFE
<
30546 mm2
SAFE
<
1212 mm
Check for Shear

Max. shear stress from table 12A of IRC: 21 - 2000 for corresponding grade of concrete
Effective depth of section at a distance equal to effective depth from pier face
te
Shear stress
100 Ast / bd
tcmax
=1058-88
=
=
2.5 MPa
970 mm
=2476.010^3/(2300970)
1.11 MPa
=10030546/(2300970)
2.5
SAFE
1.369 %
Permissible shear stress in concrete (from table 12B of IRC: 21 -2000)
tc
Shear force for which the reinforcement is required
Vs
Asw reqd for shear
Asw
687 mm2
Minimum shear reinforcement (as per CL. 304.7.1.5 of IRC: 21-2000)
=0.42300200/(0.87415)
509.6 mm2
Hence provide 10 legged 10 mm Dia. bars @ 200 mm c/c
<
\
0.46 MPa
1449.8 KN
SAFE
##
Design of Pier Cap

As per Cl. 305.5.3of IRC:21-2000 total depth
A
=
=
=
500 B
C
500 + minimum of
500 +
800
1300 mm.
800
&
4000 3
800
D
Pier Centre Line
Depth of pier cap CG from top of pier cap
=
[4000500500/2+4000800/2(500+800/3)]/(4000500+4000800/2)
=
480 mm
Elevation
900
Horizontal distance of Pier cap CG from pier face

=
4000/3(1300+2500)/(1300+500)
=
1704 mm
4000
Concrete unit weight

4500
3500
1500
24 kN/m2
Self weight (SW) of pier cap

=
4000(500+1300)/22300/10^924
=
198.7 kN
2300
Increase SW by
-1
10 % to include weight of bearing pedestal etc.
BR1
Plan
BR3BR2
Shear due to self weight, Vsw

=
198.7(1+10/100)
=
218.57 kN
4500
1500
3500
Bending Moment at pier face due to SW, Msw

=
218.571.704
=
372.4 kNm
Bearing Mark
BL1
BL2
3.6
3.6

W
(kN)
A
B
DL
SIDL
LL
4.5/(6+22.25)100=
Impact
H
(kN)
180
13.509
648.0
48.6
195.81
-5.05
141.0
704.9
-18.2
507.8
0
0
0
0.0
0.0
0.0
16.0 %
31.3
-0.8
22.6
0
0
0
BL3
2.6
2.6
T
(kNm)
0
0
0
0
0
= mW
Bearing Friction
0
0.00 kn
0.00
ecc. =
0.35 m
0 kn-m
DL
0180(0.350+0.480)=
SIDL
013.509(0.350+0.480)=
0
0
0
0
0
0
W
H
(kN)
(kN)
214
31.348
82.5
1.7
173.4
0
0
0
4.5/(6+22.25)100=
112.8
-2.9 |
81.2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
M
556.4
81.5
0
0
0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0
0
0
0
0
0
4.5/(6+22.25)100=
34.3
0.7
72.1
0
0
0
0.00
0214(0.350+0.480)=
031.348(0.350+0.480)=
0
0
0
0
0
0
T
(kNm)
0
0
214.5
4.3
450.9
16.0 %
13.2
0.3
27.7
BR1
0.6
0.6
0
0
0
W
H
(kN)
(kN)
240
41.457
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
T
(kNm)
144.0
24.9
46.416
-12.2
164.6
27.8
-7.3
98.8
0
0
0
0.0
0.0
0.0
16.0 %
7.4
-2
26.3
0
0
0
BR2
3.6
3.6
0
0
0
4.5
-1.2
15.8
0
0
0
0.00
0
0
0
0
0
W
(kN)
180
13.509
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
H
(kN)
556.4
81.5
0
0
0.6
0.6
W
(kN)
240
41.457
190.63
1.92
-91.32
495.6
5.0
-237.4
81.10
0.20
-198.57
252.90
5.70
136.11
657.5
14.8
353.9
95.68
4.27
125.01
648.0
48.6
T
(kNm)
0
0
W
(kN)
214
31.348
294.4
-11.5
-17.6
1059.8
-41.4
-63.3
73.94
-4.83
-118.97
422.6
-18.7
165.4
1521.3
-67.4
595.5
316.93
-14.0
124.06
16.0 %
47.1
-1.8
-2.8
169.6
-6.6
-10.1
11.8
-0.8
-19
67.6
-3
26.5
243.4
-10.8
95.3
50.7
-2.2
19.8
0
0
0
0
0
BR3
2.6
2.6
0.00
0180.0(0.350+0.480)=
013.5(0.350+0.480)=
H
(kN)
16.0 %
30.5
0.3
-14.6
40.5
0.9
21.8
T
(kNm)
79.3
0.8
-38
13
0
-31.8
105.2
2.4
56.6
15.3
0.7
20
0.00
0214.0(0.350+0.480)=
031.3(0.350+0.480)=
0
0
0
0
0
0
0.0
0.0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
T
(kNm)
144.0
24.9
0
0
92.73
13.05
-38.77
55.6
7.8
-23.3
34.74
18.96
-152.53
127.57
20.93
166.67
76.5
12.6
100.0
95.68
15.70
125.01
16.0 %
14.8
2.1
-6.2
8.9
1.3
-3.7
5.6
3
-24.4
20.4
3.3
26.7
12.2
2
16
15.3
2.5
20
0.0
0.0
0
0
0
H
(kN)
0.00
0240.0(0.350+0.480)=
041.5(0.350+0.480)=
0
0
0
0
0
0
0.0
0.0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Braking Force
= Wv2/127R
Centrifugal Force
Design Speed, v =
Total Reaction at each bearing for load combination

20.0
25.0
13.9
0.0
0.0
0.0
16.6
20.8
11.5
20.0
25.0
13.9
0.0
0.0
0.0
16.6
20.8
11.5
20.0
25.0
13.9
0.0
0.0
0.0
16.6
20.8
11.5
20.0
25.0
13.9
0.0
0.0
0.0
16.6
20.8
11.5
20.00
25.00
13.85
0.0
0.0
0.0
16.6
20.8
11.5
20.0
25.0
13.9
0.0
0.0
0.0
16.6
20.8
11.5
16.6
19.4
14.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
13.8
16.1
11.6
16.6
19.4
14.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
13.8
16.1
11.6
16.6
19.4
14.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
13.8
16.1
11.6
16.6
19.4
14.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
13.8
16.1
11.6
16.62
19.39
14.00
0.0
0.0
0.0
13.8
16.1
11.6
16.6
19.4
14.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
13.8
16.1
11.6
100 kmph
1000000 m
0 =195.813100^2/127/1000000
0 =-5.047100^2/127/1000000
0 =141.0435100^2/127/1000000
1000000 m
0 =82.5100^2/127/1000000
0 =1.651100^2/127/1000000
0 =173.4355100^2/127/1000000
= DL+SIDL+LL+Impact+Bearing Friction+Braking Force+Centrifugal Force

420.6
1514.4
16.6
341.0
886.7
187.7
675.6
20.8
242.7
642.9
357.2
1285.6
11.50
128.9
1160.9
193.5
193.5
193.5
696.6
696.6
696.6
13.8
16.1
11.6
245.3
245.3
245.3
637.9
637.9
637.9
335.3
267.4
273.8
201.2
185.3
283.4
16.6
20.8
11.50
535.0
180.2
173.1
1926.0
648.7
623.2
114.1
15.12
-126.48
466.48
247.569
139.43
1212.85
643.70
362.48
110.70
20.95
-218.9
388.99
296.608
236.49
233.41
178.00
141.91
56.94
42.71
-165.4
13.8
16.1
11.6
281.5
281.5
281.5
168.9
188.3
168.9
13.8
16.1
11.6
683.7
171.8
385.4
2461.3
618.5
1387.4
381.4
-0.1
155.5
538.75
251.95
403.26
1400.64
655.12
1048.39
127.6
5.0
156.5
429.42
305.69
474.83
257.61
183.43
284.88
124.8
18.2
156.6
From CL 304.7.1.1.2 of IRC: 21 - 2000

tan b
Effective depth
(due to reactions from all above bearings)

M
420.6223.6+341.0482.6+535.0023.6+466.4792.6
=
5974.4 kNm
187.6623.6+242.67152.6+180.2223.6+247.5692.6
=
2937.4 kNm
357.15253.6+128.9451252.6+173.12153.6+139.432.6
=
2912.9 kNm
193.5093.6+245.3482.6+683.6793.6+538.7472.6
=
193.5093.6+245.3482.6+171.7973.6+251.9462.6
=
193.5093.6+245.3482.6+385.4193.6+403.2582.6
=
5623.1 kNm
2960.4 kNm
4224.3 kNm
V = W - Md tanb / d
0.2 =800/4000
1.222 m
Bending Moment at a distance equal to effective depth from pier face


Md
=(535.0(3.6-1.222)+466.48(2.6-1.222)+420.6(3.6-1.222)+341.0(2.6-1.222))
3385.2 kNm
=(180.2(3.6-1.222)+247.57(2.6-1.222)+187.7(3.6-1.222)+242.7(2.6-1.222))
1550.4 kNm
=(173.1(3.6-1.222)+139.43(2.6-1.222)+357.2(3.6-1.222)+128.9(2.6-1.222))
1630.8 kNm
Shear at a distance equal to effective depth from pier face


V
=(535.0+466.48+420.6+341.0-3385.20.2/1.222)
1209.1 kN
=(180.2+247.57+187.7+242.7-1550.40.2/1.222)
604.4 kN
=(173.1+139.43+357.2+128.9-1630.80.2/1.222)
531.7 kN
Torsion at a distance equal to effective depth from pier face

=(683.7(3.6-1.222)+538.75(2.6-1.222)+193.5(3.6-1.222)+245.3(2.6-1.222))
3166.4 kNm
=(171.8(3.6-1.222)+251.95(2.6-1.222)+193.5(3.6-1.222)+245.3(2.6-1.222))
1554.0 kNm
=(385.4(3.6-1.222)+403.26(2.6-1.222)+193.5(3.6-1.222)+245.3(2.6-1.222))
2270.5 kNm
=(683.7+538.75+193.5+245.3-3166.40.2/1.222)
=(171.8+251.95+193.5+245.3-1554.00.2/1.222)
=(385.4+403.26+193.5+245.3-2270.50.2/1.222)
1143.0 kN
608.3 kN
855.9 kN
(due to reactions from BR1 BR2 alone)

191.6 kNm
-5.4 kNm
-368.3 kNm
481.4 kNm
-27.4 kNm
288.7 kNm
From CL 304.7.2.4.2 of IRC: 21 - 2000

= T(1+D/b)/1.7
Mt
= Msw+M+Mt
Me
191.63325(1+1300/2300)/1.7=
-5.4275(1+1300/2300)/1.7=
-368.338375(1+1300/2300)/1.7=
481.40815(1+1300/2300)/1.7=
-27.3542(1+1300/2300)/1.7=
288.7385(1+1300/2300)/1.7=
176.4 kNm
-5 kNm
-339.1 kNm
443.2 kNm
-25.2 kNm
265.8 kNm
372.4+5974.4+176.4=
372.4+2937.4+-5=
372.4+2912.9+-339.1=
6523.2 kNm
3304.8 kNm
2946.2 kNm
372.4+5623.1+443.2=
372.4+2960.4+-25.2=
372.4+4224.3+265.8=
6438.7 kNm
3307.6 kNm
4862.5 kNm
1.6191.63325/2.3=
1.6-5.4275/2.3=
1.6-368.338375/2.3=
133.3 kN
-3.8 kN
-256.2 kN
From CL 304.7.2.3 of IRC: 21 - 2000

= 1.6 T/b
Vt
= Vsw+V+Vt
Ve
1.6481.40815/2.3=
1.6-27.3542/2.3=
1.6288.7385/2.3=
334.9 kN
-19.0 kN
200.9 kN
218.57+1209.100905+133.3=
218.57+604.379891+-3.8=
218.57+531.7403698+-256.2=
1561.0 kN
819.1 kN
494.1 kN
218.57+1143.044706+334.9=
218.57+608.2679542+-19=
218.57+855.9350062+200.9=
1696.5 kN
807.8 kN
1275.4 kN
1000000 m
0 =294.393100^2/127/1000000
0 =-11.487100^2/127/1000000
0 =-17.5875100^2/127/1000000
16.6
20.8
11.50
Design forces
Bending Moment at the face of the pier
1000000 m
0 =46.416100^2/127/1000000
0 =-12.229100^2/127/1000000
0 =164.6100^2/127/1000000
Design Parameters
Grade of concrete
M45
15.0 MPa
Grade of steel
Modular Ratio m
Permissible tensile stress in steel in flexure, sst
240 MPa
Permissible stress in steel in shear, ss
k
j
Q
= 1015.0/(1015.0+240)
= 1-0.385/3
= 0.3850.87215.0/2
=
=
=
Clear Cover
Dia. of spacer bars will be used if required
0.385
0.872
2.515 MPa
=
=
Fe500
10
200
Total depth, D
1300
Total depth at a distance equal to effective depth from pier face, Dd

=
1300-(1300-500)/40001222
Width, b
40 mm
32 mm
1056
2300
Maximum Bending Moment

Maximum Shear
6523.2
1696.5
Provide
f
f
f
Main reinforcement
32
32
0
,
,
,
25
13
0
Nos. in
Nos. in
Nos. in
1 st layer
2 nd layer
3 nd layer
20096 mm2 steel at

10450 mm2 steel at
0 mm2 steel at
=
=
=
Total reinforcement provided
=
f
Transverse reinforcement
12
8 lgd. stps. at

30546 mm steel at
904 mm2
200 mm. c/c.
Effective cover
= (2009656+10450120+0168)/(20096+10450+0)
78 mm.
Effective depth provided
= 1300-78
1222 mm.
= [6523.210^6/(2.5152300)]^0.5
1062.0 mm
25513 mm2
Check for Flexure

Effective depth required
Reinforcement required
=6523.210^6/(2400.87212222300)
@
0.2 % as per Cl. 305.19 of IRC: 6 -2010
5621.2 mm
<
1222 mm
SAFE
0.151
<
30546 mm2
SAFE
0.197
<
SAFE
4.434
30546 mm
Check for Shear

Max. shear stress from table 12A of IRC: 21 - 2000 for corresponding grade of concrete
Effective depth of section at a distance equal to effective depth from pier face
te
Shear stress
100 Ast / bd
tcmax
=1056-78
=
=
=1696.510^3/(2300978)
=10030546/(2300978)
2.5 MPa
978 mm
0.75 MPa
Permissible shear stress in concrete (from table 12B of IRC: 21 -2000)
tc
Shear force for which the reinforcement is required
Vs
Asw reqd for shear
Asw
311 mm2
Minimum shear reinforcement (as per CL. 304.7.1.5 of IRC: 21-2000)
=0.42300200/(0.87415)
509.6 mm2
Hence provide 8 legged 12 mm Dia. bars @ 200 mm c/c
<
\
2.5
SAFE
2.333
SAFE
0.774
1.358 %
0.46 MPa
661.79 KN
Table 12B of IRC: 21- 2000
From Table 9 of IRC:21- 2000
tc for given Grade of Concrete
For Pile Cap with 6 Piles
For Pile Cap with 9 Piles
100Ast/bd
M20
M25
M30
M35
M40
0.15
0.18
0.19
0.20
0.20
0.20
0.25
0.22
0.23
0.23
0.23
0.23
0.50
0.30
0.31
0.31
0.31
0.32
0.75
0.35
0.36
0.37
0.37
0.38
1.00
0.39
0.40
0.41
0.42
0.42
1.25
0.42
0.44
0.45
0.45
0.46
1.50
0.45
0.46
0.48
0.49
0.49
1.75
0.47
0.49
0.50
0.52
0.52
2.00
0.49
0.51
0.53
0.54
0.55
2.25
0.51
0.53
0.55
56.00
0.57
2.50
0.51
0.55
0.57
0.58
0.60
2.75
0.51
0.56
0.58
0.60
0.62
3.00
0.51
0.57
0.60
0.62
0.63
0.15
0.18
0.19
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.25
0.22
0.23
0.23
0.23
0.23
0.150
0.180
0.190
0.200
0.200
0.200
0.15
0.18
0.19
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.25
0.22
0.23
0.23
0.23
0.23
0.150
0.180
0.190
0.200
0.200
0.200
0.15
0.18
0.19
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.25
0.22
0.23
0.23
0.23
0.23
0.234
0.214
0.224
0.225
0.225
0.225
0.15
0.18
0.19
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.25
0.22
0.23
0.23
0.23
0.23
0.239
0.215
0.225
0.227
0.227
0.227
Zone Factor
From Table 9 of IRC:21- 2000

Grade
Ec (GPa)
M15
26.0
M20
27.5
M25
29.0
M30
30.5
M35
31.5
M40
32.5
M45
33.5
M50
35.0
M55
36.0
M60
37.0
Zone Factor
Soil Type
Sa/g x T Limit (sec)
Zone
0.36
Rocky
1.00
0.40
IV
0.24
Medium
1.36
0.55
III
0.16
Soft
1.67
0.67
II
0.10
Maximum
2.50

001 R0 STK Substructure Design AMH To Be Sent

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

001 R0 STK Substructure Design AMH To Be Sent

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

3.2.

1 Input Data for Design of EJ Pier P3

RL of Pier cap top

Longitudinal Elevation at EJ Pier

All dimensions &

THE SECTION SHOWN IN

BR1 Deck Slab

Plan of deck and piercap

Radius of Horizontal Curvature

Max height of bearing + pedestal

C.L of Pier/ C.L of deck

Eccen Moment Moment

Reactions due to SIDL + Diaphragm

Eccen Moment Moment

Transverse Eccentricity 'e'

Distance of CL of pier from edge 5.150

Transverse Eccentricity 'e'

Distance of CL of pier from edge 5.150

Case 5- Class A - 1 lane placed at edge on the inner side of carriageway

Transverse Eccentricity 'e'

Distance of CL of pier from edge

Distance of Resultant from edge

Transverse Eccentricity 'e'

Distance of CL of pier from edge

Distance of Resultant from edge

Transverse Eccentricity 'e'

Case 8- 70R Tracked + Class A - 1 lane

Distance of CL of pier from edge

Distance of Resultant from edge

Transverse Eccentricity 'e'

C.L of Pier/ C.L of deck

Distance of CL of pier from edge

Distance of Resultant from edge

Transverse Eccentricity 'e'

3.2.1.4.1 Maximum Reaction & Transverse moment case

Eccen Moment Moment

Eccen Moment Moment

Total effect of two lanes of 70R.

A Case3 Class A - 1 lane placed at edge on the outer side of carriageway

Eccen Moment Moment

A Case4 Class A - 2 lane

Eccen Moment Moment

Eccen Moment Moment

Eccen Moment Moment

Eccen Moment Moment

Total (70R+70R)R = 659

Total effect of two lanes of 70R.

A Case8- Class 70R(Tracked)+ Class A - 1L

A Case9- Class 70R(Wheeled)+ Class A - 1L

3.2.1.4.2 Maximum Longitudinal Moment case

Eccen Moment Moment

Eccen Moment Moment

Total = Left + Right

Total effect of two lanes of 70R.

BCase 3-Class A - 1 lanes placed at edge on the inner side of carriageway

Eccen Moment Moment

Total = Left + Right

BCase 4-Class A - 2 lanes placed at edge on the inner side of carriageway

Eccen Moment Moment

BCase 5-Class A - 3 lanes placed at edge on the inner side of carriageway

Eccen Moment Moment

Total = Left + Right

Eccen Moment Moment