Professional Documents
Culture Documents
P
QS
US PS = ReUS
U = ImU
jXl
UR*
(1)
4 lossless transmission lines 4 sending and receiving ends are stiff nodes and their voltages are equal in magnitude 4 performance characteristics are drawn for midpoint location of control devices. Shunt control device The impact on power flow due to a capacitive shunt device with a reactance of XC can be investigated using the transmission model, vector diagram and mathematical relations shown in Fig. 1. Shunt devices basically impact the voltage at the point of connection. When connected to weak nodes in the power system, for example in the midpoint or in the receiving end of a long transmission line, the power flow can be influenced substantially by the change of voltage due to the shunt device. Series control device The voltage in series with the line can be created by the natural voltage drop caused by the line current across an impedance element with a capacitive reactance of XC. The insertion of a series compensation device in a transmission line directly impacts the power
jXl
UR*
where PS = active power across the transmission line QS = reactive power at the sending end US = sending end voltage UR = receiving end voltage Xl = impedance of the transmission line To be able to control the flows of active power P and/or reactive power Q, one or several of these parameters can be controlled by power equipment already available or under development. The control of the basic electrical parameters can be achieved using a shunt control device, series control device, shunt current injection device, series voltage injection device or a combination of these.
129
IS
Xl/2
Um
Xl/2
IR UR
US
Xc *
Ic
US
Um
UR
PS = Re
QS = Im US
( (
US 1 US
( (
Xl 2Xc Xl 2Xc
UR
IS
IR
Xl jXl (1 ) 4Xc
Ic
US 1
UR
jXl (1
Xl ) 4Xc
I US
Xl /2 Um 1
Xc Um 2
Xl /2
US UR
Um 2
Um 1
UR
PS = Re US
QS = Im US
US UR j(Xl Xc )
US UR j(Xl Xc )
1 Transmission-line model, power flow equations and vector diagram of the system with a shunt control device 2 Transmission-line model, power flow equations and vector diagram of the system with a series control device
flow on the line. The influence of a capacitive element providing the series voltage can be investigated using the equations shown in Fig. 2. Shunt current injection device Power flow control devices can utilise the physical principles described above, or depending on their construction and operating mode, can be based on the concepts of controllable shunt current injection and controllable series voltage injection. The concept of a device based on shunt current injection can be demonstrated using the system shown in Fig. 3. Ii is the controllable shunt current injected to the midpoint of the transmission system. Series voltage injection device As mentioned already, the series voltage can be
provided by a controlled voltage source. The series voltage device can be constructed such that the injected voltages magnitude UT and/or phase angle can be varied. The impact on power flow can be investigated by using the transmission model, vector diagram and equations shown in Fig. 4. Impact of power flow control and reactive power compensation devices on system performance By employing devices that can control the basic electrical parameters, power system performance can be significantly improved. One of the major aims of improving a transmission systems performance is to increase its power transfer capability. By using the concepts discussed above, it is possible to quantify the impact that shunt and series control devices have on power transfer
POWER ENGINEERING JOURNAL JUNE 2000
130
3 Transmission-line model, power flow equations and vector diagram of the system with a shunt current injection device 4 Transmission-line model, power flow equations and vector diagram of the system with a series voltage injection device. The equations are based on the concept with active power PT drawn from the network and reactive power QT generated locally, shown in Fig. 6.
IS US
Xl/2 Um Ii
Xl/2
IR UR
US
Um
UR
PS = Re US
QS = Im US
US UR jXl US UR jXl
Ii 2 Ii 2
IS
IR
Ii
IS
X1 Um 1
UT Um 2
X2
IR jX1I S UR US UT Um 1 Um 2
jX2 I R UR
US
Re(UT IR*) Um 1 *
131
UT PS QS PT,QT PS QS
UT
QT
PT,QT
PT
7 Achievable transmitted active power for the different series voltage injection concepts and a transmission angle of 60 8 Impact on power transfer capability using different series voltage injection concepts for transmission angles between 0 and 90
through a transmission system in a limited range by supplying or absorbing reactive current at the point of connection to the system. Series voltage injection devices improving flexibility and enhancing system performance In the case of the series voltage injection
1600
1200
800
400
90
180 , deg
270
360
1600 PT from network, QT local generated PT, QT from network no control 1200 180
800
0 400
30 , deg
60
90
devices, further system performance improvement can be achieved by providing greater operational flexibility in addition to increasing power transfer capability. There are basically two ways of generating this series voltage. One way is to draw all the active power PT and reactive power QT requirements needed to generate this voltage from the network, as shown in Fig. 5. The other way is to draw only the active power from the network and provide the reactive power required locally as in Fig. 6. The power flow control capabilities of devices capable of coupling a series voltage with a variable phase angle are shown in Fig. 7. The impact on power flow control of the former concept is shown by the green curve and of the latter by the purple one. Both the curves are for series voltages of 20% of the nominal sending end system voltage and a transmission angle of 60 between the receiving and sending end voltages. As the phase angle of the series injected voltage is varied between 0 and 360, the active power flowing through the transmission system can theoretically be controlled for a range from a maximum through to minimum values. From Fig. 7, it can also be seen that the locally provided reactive power concept has a bigger impact on power flow control compared with obtaining reactive power from the network. Fig. 8 shows the improvement and the limits (0 and 180) in power transfer capability with the different series voltage injection concepts, for an injected voltage magnitude of 20% of nominal system voltage, over a range of transmission angles . The purple band shows the operating capability of the series voltage injection device with locally supplied reactive power QT whilst the green meshed band is due to a device drawing active and reactive power from the power system. The bands indicate the control ranges of devices for varying between 0 and 180.
POWER ENGINEERING JOURNAL JUNE 2000
132
PS, MW
PS, MW
12 10
PS XC
08
US
UR
PS, pu
X1
X2
Solutions to transmission system concerns using power flow control technologies Finding the most cost-effective solution to the various issues limiting transmission performance is attracting ever growing interest as utilities deregulate and a competitive electrical supply environment is becoming a norm rather than an exception. Power flow
control technologies can provide the key to these solutions. An overview of the transmission issues and the possible effective solutions are summarised in Table 1. These solutions include both conventional as well as innovative technologies, though they are by no means exhaustive. In must be noted that, due to the wide range of network configurations and
Table 1 Overview of transmission system limitations and possible solutions using control devices STATCOM
TCSC
TCPAR
ASC
BSR
SVC
BSC
IPC
BDV = breaker switched capacitor BSC = breaker switched reactor IPC = interphase power controller QBT = quadrature boosting transformer
STATCOM = static synchronous compensator SVC = static VAr compensator TCPAR = thyristor-controlled phase-angle regulator TCSC = thyristor-controlled series capacitor UPFC = unified power flow controller
UPFC
QBT
133
X1
UT
X2 UR
I, pu
16 14 12 10 PS, pu 08 06 04 02 0 02 04
inductive b
capacitive
UT, pu
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
180
, deg c
system operation procedures, proper corrective actions to deal with various issues are of necessity application dependent.2 In steady-state conditions the total power flow on all lines that connect two power systems is determined by unbalance between power production and load demand including losses in the individual systems. On the other hand, during transients the power flow control equipment can also have an impact on the total power exchange between the systems. Power flow control technologies and equipment can thus be generally categorised according to their ability to solve steady-state or dynamic problem domains. Thermal issues are generally related to thermal limits caused by a change in the network configuration during outages and can be overcome by rearranging the network or by adding a power flow control equipment. Voltage and reactive power control issues are related to voltage constraints in the power
134
system. Low voltage at heavy load can be a limiting factor under steady-state conditions. The corrective actions include correcting the power factor and compensating the reactive losses in lines by supplying reactive power. High voltage at light load is an undesirable occurrence in the transmission and distribution systems and may be diminished using mechanically switched shunt capacitors or reactors to supplement the action of tapchangers. Low voltage as well as high voltage following outages can exceed the voltage limits so that corrective actions have to be taken to avoid further equipment damage. Power flow issues are generally related to controlling the active power in the power system for better utilisation of the transmission assets, minimisation of losses, limit flows to contract paths, post contingency strategies etc. Dynamic and stability issues are related to dynamic performance of the power system. Transient stability describes the ability of the
POWER ENGINEERING JOURNAL JUNE 2000
11 (a) SVC system, (b) its steady-state operating and (c) performance characteristics
PS X1 US X2 UR
Ush, pu
capacitive b a
inductive
Ish, pu
12 no control 10 08 PS, pu 06 04 02 0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
180
, deg c
135
X1 US
X2 UR
voltage at the point of connection. Seriesconnected equipment allow the impedance characteristics of the transmission system where they are installed to be varied and thus have direct impact on the power transfer capability. These devices can be permanently connected to a system or are connected through circuit breakers. Breaker switched devices offer greater operational flexibility in terms of allowing the operators to adapt to changing reactive power requirements of their power systems. Their performance is limited by their step-wise control characteristics. Thyristor-controlled series capacitor (TCSC) The thyristor-controlled series capacitor system is shown in Fig. 9 together with its performance characteristics. The variation of capacitance can be achieved by varying the thyristorcontrolled reactance that is connected in parallel to the capacitor. The reactance is determined by the thyristor valve firing angle. The controllable parameter influencing the power flow is the capacitance of the TCSC. Advanced series compensator (ASC) In contrast to the TCSC where the reactive power is produced or consumed by capacitors and reactors, advanced series compensators use power electronics elements with turn-off capability such as integrated gate commutated thyristors (IGCT). By proper repetitive switching of the IGCTs, the phases of the system are connected and/or disconnected causing reactive power to flow among them. The main difference from the TCSC is that the injected series voltage UT of the ASC does not depend on line current. The controllable parameter here is the series injected voltage and is coupled in general to the power system via a booster transformer. Fig. 10 shows an ASC system with its corresponding performance characteristics. Static VAr compensator (SVC) An SVC consists of a combination of fixed capacitors, thyristor-switched capacitors and thyristor-controlled reactors connected in parallel with the power system in most cases via a step-up transformer. The maximum SVC reactive currents are dependent on SVC terminal voltage. The reactive power produced or consumed by an SVC is generated or absorbed by passive reactive components. The controllable parameter in this equipment is the parallel capacitive or inductive susceptance.
Ush, pu
capacitive b
inductive
Ish, pu
16 14 12 10 PS, pu 08 06 04 02 0 02 04 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 , deg c STATCOM on inductive limit no control STATCOM on capacitive limit
12 (a) STATCOM system, (b) its steady-state operating and (c) performance characteristics
136
PS
UT
X1 UM UR
US
Within the SVC rating, its susceptance can be continuously controlled. When the SVC reaches its capacitive or inductive limit, it then acts as a parallel capacitor or reactor, respectively. Fig. 11 shows a SVC system, its steady-state operating and performance characteristics. Static synchronous compensator (STATCOM) By employing power electronics elements with turn-off capability as in the case of the ASC, the SVC system can be similarly improved to become a static synchronous compensator (STATCOM). The STATCOM basically consists of an IGCT converter and a DC circuit. The reactive power generation or absorption is performed by the system itself and in balanced conditions reactive elements are necessary for energy storage during short periods between power electronic switching. From the STATCOM operating characteristics in Fig. 12, it is evident that it can supply constant reactive
POWER ENGINEERING JOURNAL JUNE 2000
current almost over the entire range, independent of the terminal voltage. The STATCOM controllable parameter is its reactive current. Thyristor-controlled phase angle regulator (TCPAR) Phase-shifting transformers (PST) are transformers with complex turn ratios. The phase difference between the PST terminal voltages is achieved by connecting a boosting transformer in series with the transmission line, as shown in Fig. 13. The active and reactive powers that are injected into the transmission line must be taken from the network by the shunt transformer and redirected to the boosting transformer. If losses are neglected, the PST does not produce or consume reactive power. The thyristor-controlled phase angle regulator is one type of PST with equal input and output voltage magnitudes but with a
13 (a) TCPAR system, (b) its steady-state operating and (c) performance characteristics
137
PS
UT
X1 UM UR
US
50 , deg c
100
150
200
14 (a) QBT system, (b) its steady-state operating and (c) performance characteristics
phase shift between these voltages. The TCPAR is controlled extremely quickly by a static thyristor based on-load tapchanger. The controllable parameter of the TCPAR is the voltage phase shift angle . Fig. 13 shows also the steady-state operating and performance characteristics of the TCPAR. Quadrature booster transformer (QBT) The quadrature booster transformer is another type of PST where the phasor of the injected voltage is shifted by a constant angle with respect to the input voltage vector. Various types of QBT enable various angles. The controllable parameter of the QBT is the magnitude of the injected voltage UT. Fig. 14 shows a QBT system with =90, its steady-
and
performance
Interphase power controller (IPC) The interphase power controller is a seriesconnected device, where the major components in each of the phases are a reactor and a capacitor subjected to individually phaseshifted voltages provided by two phase shifting transformers PAR1 and PAR2. There are many IPC configurations, depending on specific application requirements and on the method used to implement the internal phase shifts. In the case where the reactor (XA) and the capacitor (XA) form a conjugate pair, each terminal of the IPC will behave as a voltagedependent current source and provide the IPC
POWER ENGINEERING JOURNAL JUNE 2000
138
PAR 1 XA
12 10 08 PS, pu 06 04 02 0
XA
1 + 2 2
1 + 2 2
IPC
90
0 , deg
90
concerns have been proposed and discussed. In Fig. 17 a 200MVA phase-shifting regulating transformer for 240kV/132kV based on a new compact concept is shown. The two booster transformers for in-phase control and quadrature control, normally connected in series with the main transformer, are replaced by only few extra windings inside the main transformer tank. This considerably reduces not only the investment costs but also the operating costs. The main saving is in the transformer cores and the copper windings. Another key benefit is the significantly smaller space that is required. Utilities share many of the common energy transmission problems yet have different technical, economical and environmental requirements. In order that their needs are individually met, and cost-effective solutions
139
PS
UT X1
US
UR
UT=05 pu P minimum
50 , deg b
100
150
200
17 200 MVA phaseshifting regulated transformer for 240 kV/132 kV based on a new compact concept
are provided, the key lies in the application of innovative power flow control technologies. Co-operation between the power industry partners can develop optimised solutions
capable of meeting the performance requirements demanded in the new and evolving electrical utility environment.
References 1 DUNLOP , R. D., GUTMAN, R., AND MARCHENKO, R. P.: Analytical development of loadability characteristics for EHV and UHV transmission lines, IEEE Trans., March/April 1979, PAS-98, pp.606617 2 CIGRE TF 38-01-06: Load flow control in high voltage power systems using FACTS controllers, CIGRE, January 1996 3 WIRTH, E., and RAVOT, J. -F .: Regulating transformers in power systems new concepts and applications ABB Review, 4/1997 4 JAUCH, T., KARA, A., KIEBOOM, G., and WIRTH, E.: Operational aspects and benefits of interphase power controllers with conventional or electronically switched phase shifting devices a robust FACTS application, CIGRE-Session, Paris, August 1998 5 LINDER, S. et al.: A new range of reverse conducting gate-commutated thyristors for high-voltage medium-power applications, Proceedings of the 7th European Conference on Power Electronics and Applications, Trondheim, Norway, September 1997
IEE: 2000 The authors are with ABB High Voltage Technologies Ltd., Dept. AET, PO Box 8546, CH8050, Zurich, Switzerland.
140