Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Revisiting Malaysia's technology and R&D-related policy studies and findings from 1990-2012 - review of effectiveness towards the technological capabilities of companies and industrial development
by Dr Norlela Ariffin norlela.ariffin@gmail.com , hp +6012 200 2871
Senior VP, Excellent Spring Sdn Bhd Director, Penang Women Development Centre (PWDC)
Revisiting Malaysia's technology and R&D-related policy studies and findings from 1990-2012 - review of effectiveness towards the technological capabilities of companies and industrial development This paper revisits my research on Malaysias technological and R&D status since 1990 till 2012:
Intensification of Research Areas in Priority Areas (IRPA) project: An Evaluation of R&D Programs under the IRPA Mechanism Financed in the Fifth Malaysia Plan - UUM Survey (1992). IRPA program on the Development of Advanced Semiconductor Package (2006-2007)
Re-activation role as new industry partner; full-time on-site research on 3D Quad Flat No-Lead Semiconductor Package for 1 year at AIC semiconductor plant commenced in December 2006.
- Program members: AIC Semiconductor Sdn Bhd (new industry partner), University Kebangsaan Malaysia (new program leader), University Malaya and AMREC (Advanced Material Research Centre, SIRIM). The World Bank-Ministry of Science, Technology and the Environment Review of the National Technology Development Policy, Malaysia: Output 5 - A Demand-Driven Perspective on Industrial Technology Policy in Malaysia (1995). - As Consultant, East Asia & Pacific Country Department I (EA1), World Bank. UNDP program: Technology transfer to Malaysia: A study of electronics and electrical firms and the supporting industries in Klang Valley (1995/1996)
Corporate Sector Survey on Productivity and Investment Climate Study: Innovation Capability Audit Survey (2003). Report by MIGHT for the Economic Planning Unit, Prime Ministers Department, Malaysia. - As lead consultant and collaborated with Prof Micheal Hobday (SPRU-CENTRIM) who benchmarked leading companies in Korea and Thailand.
Norlela Ariffin (2003). Initial policy prescription proposal for E&E industry: Spearheading the growth of analog design capabilities in Malaysia : EPU Innovation Audit - Policy Paper submitted to Dato Halipah Esa, Deputy Director General (Macro), Economic Planning Unit, 26 March.
: Learning Processes and Technological Capability-Accumulation Paths: Firms in the Electronics Industry in the Industrial District of Manaus, Brazil. National Technology Mapping Programme II: Wood, Machinery and Food (2002). Report by PRIMA for the Economic Planning Unit, Malaysia.
As project managing consultant Study involves competency audit survey of companies, formulating technology roadmaps and conducting international benchmarking.
Norlela Ariffin (2011), Innovating up to speed, Penang Economic Monthly, May, Issue 05.11, pp. 8-17.
Norlela Ariffin currently promotes social innovation that will increase the income of single mothers and women in rural and urban poor areas at the Single Mothers and Women Cooperative in mainland Penang and the Women Development Corporation (PWDC) by commercialising innovative university research in Penang and promoting biomass utilisation into productive economic generation.
Corporate Sector Survey on Productivity and Investment Climate Study: Innovation Capability Audit Survey (2003). Report by MIGHT for the Economic Planning Unit, Prime Ministers Department, Malaysia. - As lead consultant and collaborated with Prof Micheal Hobday (SPRU-CENTRIM) who benchmarked leading companies in Korea and Thailand. Initiated and collaborated with the Selangor Human Resources Development Centre (SHRDC) to secure special funding for AIC Semiconductor Sdn Bhd for the QFN semiconductor packaging Pilot Line under the Graduate Re-skilling Training for the Masters by Apprenticeship degree program, 2005.
MECD Study on Entrepreneur Development at the Corridor Development, 28th December 07 till March 31 2008 As Project and Research Advisor to Innovation Associates (iA Group), 49th floor, Petronas Tower 2, KLCC, 50088 Kuala Lumpur
Ariffin, Norlela (2010) Internationalisation of technological innovative capabilities: levels, types and speed (learning rat es) in the electronics industry in Malaysia, Int. J. Technological Learning, Innovation and Development , Vol. 3, No. 4, pp.347391.
Full-time member of the Sustainable Urban Development (i.e. Waste Management) City & Corridor PEMANDU Lab Northern Corridor, Sept 2nd Nov 4th 2011. Consultant to Malaysian Industry-Government Group for High Technology (MIGHT) to develop for the Malaysia Biomass Action Plan that would focus on sustainable production and SMEs, 2012.
The question of how Malaysia can move to the next high stage of development and innovation-driven economy is:
The other approach, which can be implemented simultaneously, is to look at Malaysias existing strengths and to focus efforts on strengthening them.
A third approach is to focus on the current realities of where companies and industries are and where they will be on their next thresholds.
1000
Korea
800
Singapore Taiwan
Law promotion of SME Innovation (2001): 14,626 Korean SMEs have received Innobiz certification (as of end 2008) 1. Manufacturing 2. Services/Non-Mfg 3. Agriculture 4. Construction 5. Environment 6. Biotech 7. Software 8. Design
600
400
200
0 1980 1981 1982 1983 1984 1985 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007
Source : IMF, April 2009
In order for Malaysia as a whole to achieve high-income status, it is useful to examine factors which contributed to the global competitiveness of 144 countries over time, as ranked in the World Economic Forums Global Competitive Ranking.
Rank INDICATORS CURRENT WEIGHTAGE OF MALAYSIA FUTURE / TARGET WEIGHTAGE OF MALAYSIA Sub Indicators Beta
R Squared 0.848
1 2 3
4 5 6 7 8 Social Infrastructure
and Political Institutions (SIPI)
Communications Infrastructure
0.036
Context for Strategy Context for and Rivalry Strategy and Rivalry Factor (Input) Communications Conditions Infrastructure Microeconomic Competitiveness (MICRO)
Innovation Infrastructure Company Operations and Strategy (COS) Factor (Input) Conditions Strategy and Operational Effectiveness Communications Infrastructure Logistical Infrastructure Rule of Law
0.851
0.841
0.35
0.48
Mobile Telephone Subscribers per 100 population Utility Patents per Million Population
Production Process Sophistication Internet Access in schools
0.023
0.833
0.256
0.825
0.615
0.817
0.471
0.816
0.463
0.812
0.678
0.811
9
0.42 0.36
Human Capacity Human Capacity
0.612
0.798
10
0.068
0.793
Increasing factors that contribute to the increase of global competitiveness - based on data from 144 countries over time
It is significant to note that factors ranked highly as contributing to global competitiveness are a combination of infrastructure (Telephone Lines ranked at #1 and Internet Access in Schools at #6 this bodes well for Penang through the free WIFI provided by the state government), Utility Patents are ranked highly at #4. A utility innovation is an exclusive right granted for a "minor" invention which is not required to satisfy the test of inventiveness which is required of a patent (a patent is protected for 20 years from the date of filing while a utility innovation is protected 10 + 5 + 5 years from the date of filing subject to use).
Production Process Sophistication ranked at #5 in which Greater Penang and Klang Valley are famed for having the fastest production ramp-up times in the world. That is why when new production plants were being set up in China in the early 2000s, Malaysians were transferred from MNC corporate offices to fill key managerial positions.
Table 3: FDI and Technology Transfer is among Least Significant Factor to Global Competitiveness
On the other hand, Technology Transfer and FDI is ranked at the fourth lowest factor at #119 out of a total of 122 factors examined.
This may prove to be significant in the future as the industrial growth of Greater Penang, Klang Valley and the rest of Malaysias industrial growth have been primarily driven by FDI.
Of other greater significance are Good Governance Factors such as Rule of Law and Control of Corruption, ranked #8 and #9, respectively.
Build Up Routine Production Capability To Produce More Complex, Higher Value-Added Products
2 Production Capability Level More complex, higher value-added products : digital, DVD, flatscreen CTV, CDMA LP-link MP-link LP-link MP-link Office & computer equipment LP-link MP-link
1
LP-link MP-link Starts with a few relatively simple discrete components, analogue products, parts assembly, SKD, 1980 1970
1990
2000
Time
Outsourced Chip Manufacturer Wafer foundry: TSMC UMC CSM Tower Local: Silterra 1st Silicon On semiconductors MIMOS Components Assembly & test: Amkor, ASE SPIL STAT-ChipPAC Local: Carsem Unisem Globetronics AIC Semicon
Assembly & Test
Smartcard modules
Chip/Component Manufacturer
Infineon Philips Lucent ST Micro Motorola Intel SIS Sony Liteon Asus Sampo Compal
42 & 50 Plasma TV
Electronic Components
Semiconductor
Contract or Sub-Assembly Manufacturer Solectron Flextronics Celestics SCI Sanmina Plexus Jabil ACT Local:
UNICO, BCM,
OEM Sony Cisco Nokia Philips Sharp Dell Panasonic HP/Compaq IBM
Local: LKT Cosmo Greatech Pentamaster Eng Technology Numac Machine Tool Prodelcon
End User
& Semiconductor
Green Waste in urban areas (housing , highways e.g. Penang has 500 tons per day with the growing of more trees (5,000 trees) in urban areas, there will be more green waste. Though officially closed in 2002, the Jelutong landfill continues to receive 1,350 tons of C&D and green waste daily. The waste is not buried but left in the open. Leachate in landfill can be used immediately as feedstock for biogas Agro-farming waste rural areas bananas, pineapples, etc. Food waste Greater KL and Penang each produce 1000 tons of food waste per day Palm oil waste from private mills Sewage sludge (toxic copper and lead) - currently dumped into the landfill and sea. In Penang island, 50 tons per day. Singapore and China use sewage sludge to make cement for their buildings, and for energy generation. Opportunities: Food Waste into Green Chemistry and bio-solvents Green waste into Eco-pulp and paper products Waste into Bio-ethanol and bio-fuel Leachate in landfill into biogas Our biomass SMEs to expand overseas where biomass feedstock for energy is plentiful (sawdust as energy feedstock Canada, US, Sweden, Brazil, China) Partnering with cost-effective and commercial bio-refinery companies that turn waste into bio-solvents, pulp and paper, green chemical, bio-
SWOT Analysis
Weakness Sustainable high-volume long-term contract of palm oil-based feedstock is controlled by big palm oil plantations
Threats Most European and US international bio-fuel and bio-ethanol companies are only interested in cheapest sugar (not biomass) feedstock 20 cents/kilo. Large Taiwan industrial flour companies are only interested in cheapest crude
What a waste!!
25,000 tons/day of waste is generated in Peninsular Malaysia in 2012 based on projections in the National Strategic Plan. 45% if food waste
Food Waste - we need to encourage the usage of this chemically-rich resource & source of functionalised carbon
25,000 tons/day of waste is generated in Peninsular Malaysia in 2012 based on projections in the National Strategic Plan. (Pemandu-JSPN Waste Management Lab Report, April 2012). Malaysia generates 21,000 tons per day of which 17,000 tons are collected by local authorities (Final PEMANDU NCER C&C Lab Report, March 2012) 45-50% comprised of food waste that is dumped into the landfill (Pemandu GKL Lab Report, 2011, C&C NCER Lab Report, March 2012) in the UK, over 90% of the 5.7 Mt of commercial and industrial Food Waste is discarded to landfill. 90 Mt of food waste generated every year in the EU incl. industrial and household food waste, or 179kg per capita
Thus, there is available source of functionalised carbon. Most is landfilled, and it if isnt landfilled, it is used for 1st generation, lower-value applications such as compost, anaerobic digestion or animal feed.
Source: PEMANDU Solid Waste Management Lab (April 2012) Business-as-usual is not sustainable
Current state of affairs
Increasing amount of solid waste - 25,000 tons/day waste generated in Peninsular Malaysia in 2012 based on projections in the National Strategic Plan. - Only an estimated of 5% recycled. Source separation scheme ongoing but still at early stage. Landfills are the only disposal means in Malaysia - 95% waste land-filled. Around 300 sites but only 60% in operations. - Not more than 10 sanitary landfills have been built (vs 22 specified in NSP).
Urgency to move away from landfills lack of areas for new landfills especially within major conurbation and corridors landfills increase Methane and GhG emissions causing climate change
New sustainable SWM technologies are required to address environmental issues. Emerging technologies are available and looks promising but viability needs to be verified.
Source: JPSPN
Malaysia is currently dependent on landfills with 95% of waste collected ending up in landfills
State Johor Kedah Kelantan Melaka Negeri Sembilan Pahang Perak Perlis Pulau Pinang Sabah Sarawak Selangor Terengganu WP Kuala Lumpur WP Labuan Landfills in operation 14 8 13 2 7 16 17 1 2 19 49 8 8 0 1 Landfills Not in operation 23 7 6 5 11 16 12 1 1 2 14 14 12 7 0 Total 37 15 19 7 18 32 29 2 3 21 63 22 20 7 1
Total
165
131
296
A world of possibilities
Agro-residues 46 Mt/y
Spent coffee grounds 3 Mt/y 1 Mt/y of food waste
Palm oil waste 15.8 Mt/y 30 Mt/y of Agro-residues 382 t/y coffee husks Cassava starch 228 Mt/y
nanocomposites
bio-surfactants
natural chelants
PVC replacements hydrogels chemical monomers
cosmetic waxes
bio-solvents
PepsiCo looks to reuse plant waste Mar 14, 2011 6:10pm EDT CHICAGO (Reuters) - PepsiCo Inc (PEP.N) is working on ways to reuse waste like oat husks and orange peels, to save money in its supply chain, in areas such as packaging.
Bio-refinery
Fuels
Solvent
Plastics
Biomass
Not from Food Quality feedstock, instead use Food Waste
Bulk chemicals
Fine chemicals
Fibres
Oils
Biomass
including food and wastes
CHEMICAL POTENTIAL
agro-
ADDING VALUE
Extractables
(secondary metabolites from straw)
TECHNOLOGIES
Composites
The The
Chemical industry is too dependent on traditional virgin sources of raw materials. So instead, use food waste as the raw material
Methodology - Indicators
EPI Rank
EPI Rank EPI Score Country EPI circa 2000 76.2 63.8 68.1 EPI, Most Recent Year Available (2010) 76.7 70.4 69.9 69.2 69 69 68.9 68.9 68.8 68.8 Percentage Change EPI Pilot Trend Rank 89 1 84 106 113 19 71 12 20 63 EPI Pilot Trend Score 2.42 18 2.95 0.26 -0.52 11.02 4.38 11.31 11.01 5.44 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 9 76.69 70.37 69.92 69.2 69.03 69 68.92 68.9 68.82 68.82 Switzerland Latvia Norway 0.51 7.35 1.91 0.4 3.35 7.62 1.11 6.37 8.73 2.68
Luxembourg 68.8 Costa Rica France Austria Italy United Kingdom Sweden 66 62.3 67.9 63.2 61.2 66.4
How A Tiny Central American Country Is Getting Richer And Saving The Environment
Uses 99.2% renewable energy
Countries with similar levels of performance: New Zealand Ecuador Germany Portugal Australia
Countries with similar trend performance, 2000-2010: Indonesia Trinidad and Tobago Viet Nam Chile Namibia Source: http://epi.yale.edu/dataexplorer/countryprofiles
36
37
b) Innovative Capability:
Capability to generate & manage change
Adapted from Hobday (1999). Understanding innovation in electronics in Malaysia In Jomo, Felker & Rasiah (eds) Industrial Technology Development in Malaysia: Industry & Firm Studies, Routledge, UK)
Kinematics Simulation
PCB Layout FPGA Test and Debugging PCB Fabrication ASIC/SoC Fabrication Semiconductor Packaging Pilot Run
FMEA
Design for Mfg. & Assy. Rapid Prototyping Product Testing Prototype Build and Integration Mould & Tooling Design Functional Testing FMEA Reliability Testing Pre-Compliant Testing Product Certification Customized Production Machineries Pilot Run & Mass Production
Trial Testing
IC Design Support
Internal Qual (JEDEC) Mix-Signal IC Design Service Design Rule Fix & Doc. Pilot Run
RF IC Design Service
INDUSTRY
Types Of Capability Levels Of Capability
ROUTINE OPERATING CAPABILITY: THE CAPABILITY TO USE EXISTING TECHNOLOGY
Engaging prime consultant. Preparation of initial project outline. Construction of basic civil works. Simple plant erection Purchase equipment Recruitment.
Project Management
Product- centred
SKD (semi-knocked down): parts assembly, only final assembly. Assemble kits: dissamble and re-assemble kits. PPC: production planning and control. Organising basic process flow. Visual testing only.
Routine QC to maintain basic standards: incoming, final product inspection, out-going inspection.
BASIC OPERATION
Level 2
Installation, maintenance, servicing, Simple customising of existing systems. Basic plant erection
Routine maintenance of tools and equipment. Total Preventative Maintenance (TPM). Total Productive Maintenance. Replication of unchanging items of equipment.
Process flow, line balancing. Assemble separate parts into complete assembly CKD (complete knocked down): complete assembly: PCBA and product assembly. Efficiency improvement from experience in existing tasks. Routine testing.
Replication of fixed specification Routine QC to maintain existing standards: inline QC Minor clean-up of design to suit production or market.
Installation, Routine maintenance, Production servicing. capability Simple customising of Level 2 existing systems. Basic plant erection. Systems integration. Basic Provide project innovative management capability services to customers. Level 3 Providing customised software solutions
Software Develop automated equipment. development. Equipment Design Centre Project upgraded to separate firm. management of Mould & die design. large-scale High precision tooling, investment projects, progressive metal stamping, international plastic injection moulding. investments.
Automation of processes Flexible & multi-skilled production. Business process re-engineering. Dev new process specifications. Able to transfer to production directly from R&D design or drawing.
Design Centre upgraded to separate firm. Own product design for local or regional markets. Electrical, PCB Chassis, Chip-on-board, Platform designs. Design for testability and debugDFT/DFD ISO9001 Software development Systems engineering.
Projects management on a global scale. Full turnkey solution. Recognised training & service centres to TNC Group, customers or suppliers.
R&D for specifications and designs of new high precision tools, complex automated equipment or production systems. Patents. Set-up of recognised training institutes in precision tool & die, or precision plastic moulding with universities.
Radical innovation in Rapid prototyping, VLSI design. organisation. Package electrical design. Own-developed CIM with Substrate and piece parts design. customers, vendors or Group. Materials and surface analysis. In-depth Failure Analysis. Upgraded to regional or worldwide Developing manufacturing, FA and Design Centres or world product TestCAD software tools, Patents. mandates. Providing design services to TNC Group or customers.
Project Management
Product- Centred
Fast time-to-design cuttingProcess and software Is a leading regional or edge and hi-prec equipment development to produce & international R&D, to produce latest or cuttingtest high yield, product development, edge products and miniaturised and higher ASICs or software design components performance HDD centre/s. Is among regional or global products and chips. R&D into new product leader of CNC complex Time-to-volume generations using equipment, high precision production. leading-edge technology, tooling, stamping, die & Research into advanced larger wafers, higher mould, prototype models. material and new performance HDD & specifications to produce chips. future or cutting-edge R&D into more uniform products. crystal growth, improved magnetic orientation, advanced materials.
Source: Norlela Ariffin (2000). Internationalisation of Innovative Capabilities: The Malaysian Electronics Industry. PhD Dissertation, SPRU, University of Sussex. Framework is based on actual activities of firms in the Malaysian electronics industry, and adapted from Bell and Pavitt (1995).
The statistical results do show that there is a significant difference in technological capability levels between the two regions. Penang firms overall, have higher technological capability levels than those in the Klang Valley. However the differences between MNC subsidiaries in the two locations, as well as between local suppliers linked to MNC subsidiaries, and between local independent firms are not significant.
Table 4 Statistical Results Of Factors Influencing Technological Capability Levels Sampled Firms All Group 1 Group 2 Group 3 sampled TNC Local Local firms subsidiaries suppliers independent Factors linked to firms n=53 n=26 TNC n=13 subsidiaries n=14 1 2 3a 3b 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 10 11 11 12 12 TNC parent origin TNC-led local origin Product type Final goods or supplier OEM-ODMOBM Exportorientation Market orientation Local decisionmaking Automation level Region Employee size Sales Group size Num engineer % engineer Sales/ Employee Profit
Local firms Rho=.066 Chi-sq = 14.021 Rho = .198 Rho = -.1 Rho = .267** Rho = .28** Chi-sq = 8.021 Rho = .117 Rho = .559*** Rho = .393*** Rho =.084 Rho =.141 Rho=.134 Rho = .388** Rho = .455*** Rho = .117 Rho = .450** Chi-sq = 9.084 Chi-sq = 12.2 Rho = -.105 Rho = -.247 Rho = .504*** Rho = .058 Chi-sq = 3.369 Rho = -.201 Rho = .614*** Rho =.339* Chi-sq = 2.28 Rho = .192 Rho = .192 Rho = .343 Rho = .405 Rho = .568** Rho = .288 n.a
Rho=.282 Chi-sq = 8.56 Rho = .073 All are suppliers Rho = .728*** Rho = .546** Chi-sq = 4.472, Rho = .546** Rho = .8*** Rho = .24 Chi-sq = 5.1* Rho = .213 Rho = .039 Rho = .308 Rho = .535 Rho = .559* Rho = -.411 Rho= .296
Rho=-.139 Chi-sq = 11.51 Rho = .598** Rho = .228 Rho = -.073 Rho = .398 Chi-sq = 5.146, Rho = .494* Rho = .428 Rho = .649** Chi-sq = 5.4* Rho = -.407 Rho =.31 Rho = .236 Rho = .733** Rho = .221 Rho = -.413 Rho = .54
Significance level: * between .05 and .1, ** between .01 and .05, *** less than .01 Based on Table 4 and data drawn from 53 firms in Greater Penang and Klang Valley interviewed.
MNC subsidiaries and local suppliers linked to MNC subsidiaries in Greater Penang have higher average numbers of R&D staff (85 and 25 staff, respectively) than those in the Klang Valley. But local independent firms in the Klang Valley have a higher average (43 staff) than those in Penang. These differences may be due to the types of product manufactured, length of operation or other factors. Even though the numbers of people are less than those in developed countries, these numbers are gradually increasing - some firms that started with three personnel in the 1970s had as many as 200 R&D staff by the late 1990s; in 2008, Intel in Penang had 1,200 staff in the Intel Design Centre.
Table 5 Average Number of R&D Staff In Firms Interviewed Group Group 1 TNC Subsidiaries Group 2 Local suppliers linked to TNC subsidiaries KV Penang 481 25 11 Group 3 Independent firms Total Local Firms Total
KV 2315 43
Penang 1003 10 38
KV 1760 33
Penang 630 18 30
KV 2215 47
Penang 2295 71 56
Design & Development Activities in the Electronics Industry in Greater Penang & Klang Valley
Product Design (Concept) Product Design (Mechanical) Application & System Design (Software) Application & System Design (Electronics) Semiconductor IC Design Semiconductor Packaging Design
Kinematics Simulation
PCB Layout FPGA Test and Debugging PCB Fabrication ASIC/SoC Fabrication Semiconductor Packaging Pilot Run
FMEA
Design for Mfg. & Assy. Rapid Prototyping Product Testing Prototype Build and Integration Mould & Tooling Design Functional Testing FMEA Reliability Testing Pre-Compliant Testing Product Certification Customized Production Machineries Pilot Run & Mass Production
Trial Testing
IC Design Support
Internal Qual (JEDEC) Mix-Signal IC Design Service Design Rule Fix & Doc. Pilot Run
RF IC Design Service
Figure 4 Research update in October to November 2008: innovation audit of front-end semiconductor and electronic design centres/firms
10
No. of Companies
8 6 4 2 0
10%
5% 0%
Source: authors research update with Robert Tai based on MIGHT Innovation Audit in Sept-Oct 2008
The recruitment forecast conducted in 2008 for Design and Development staff over the next five years (2009-2014) is expected to increase. However, year 2009 was expected to experience a slight dip in recruitment, partly due to the not so favourable sales forecast due to the global financial crisis in 2008. The expected year-on-year growth is about 6%.
Figure 2: Research Update in October 2008
The types of new recruits are centred on IC design and application software and hardware engineers. There is also a strong emphasis on non-technical related recruits as well
How long did firms take to build up technological capability in Penang and Klang Valley?
Figure 8. Mean speed (in years) to move through various technological capability levels
11.1 4.4
0
Project Management
5.1
4.5
0 0 0
0
4.5
4.3
5.4
4.7
4.4
4.3
3.4
3.4
5 10
4.5
15
4.5
20 25 30
years
master operation
advanced innovation
Source: Derived from the research.
basic innovation
research-based innovation
intermediate innovation
Types of capability Levels of capability Start operation to entry into electronics industry speed Entry into electronics industry to master routine production speed
Fastest Speed To Move Through Technological Capability Levels, Regardless of Type Mean= 2.7, n=53 Median = 0, Mode = 0, SD = 9.1, Min=0, max= 57 Mean= 3.4, n=51 Median = 3, Mode = 7, SD = 9.7, Min=0, max= 61 Mean = 3.2, n=51 Med = 2.8, mode = 4, SD=3.4,min=-2, max=13.3 Mean = 7.6, n=43 Med = 5.7, mode = 14, SD=5.2, min=-.8,max=18.4 Mean = 11.9, n=19 Med = 12, mode = -.8, SD=6.5, min=-.8,max=23.2 Mean = 22.1, n=2 SD=2.6, min=20.2,max=24 Mean = 4.5, n=44 Med = 3.6, mode = 0, SD=3.4, min=0, max=14.4 Mean = 9, n=19 Med = 8.2, mode = 7, SD=4.5, min=.5, max=19.2 Mean = 19.7, n=2 SD=5.4, min=16,max=23.5 Mean = 4.5, n=19 Med = 4.4, mode = 0, SD=2.7, min=0, max=10 Mean = 16.9, n=2 SD=4.4, min=13.8,max=20 Mean = 9.1, n=2 SD=1.3, min=8.2,max=10
Product-centred
Project management
Master basic operation to start of advanced innovation speed Master basic operation to start of research-based innovation speed Start basic innovation after starting intermediate innovation speed
Mean = 4.7 Med = 3, Mode = 0, SD = 4.6, min = -.5, max = 15.6, n=34 Mean = 8.9 Med = 8, Mode = 8, SD = 5.6, min = 0, max = 19, n=25 Mean = 14.7 Med = 16.5, Mode = 7, SD = 5.9, min = 7, max = 23.2, n=11 N=1, Speed = 20.2 Mean = 4.4 Med = 3.7, Mode = 2, SD = 3.4, min = .5, max = 14.4, n=22 Mean = 10.1 Med = 7.1, Mode = 5.2, SD = 5.2, min = 5.2, max = 19.2, n=9
Mean = 4.5 Med = 3, Mode = 1.1, SD = 4.5, min = -2.1, max = 18, n=36 Mean = 7.7 Med = 5.8, Mode = -.5, SD = 5.4, min = -.5, max = 17.3, n=25 Mean = 13 Med = 12, Mode = 12, SD = 7.3, min =4.3, max=24, n=12 n=1, Speed = 23.9 Mean = 4.3 Med = 4.4, Mode = 6, SD = 2.3, min = 0, max = 8, n=23 Mean = 10 Med = 10.1, Mode = 1.3, SD = 5.1, min = 1.3, max = 15.4, n=8 n=1, Speed = 21.9 Mean = 5.4 Med = 6, Mode = 6, SD = 3.8, min =.5, max = 13.6, n=9 n=1 Speed = 20.5 n=1 Speed = 6.9
Mean = 5.1 Med = 4.2, Mode = 4, SD = 4.5, min = -1, max = 16.4, n=28 Mean = 9.1 Med = 8.8, Mode = 8, SD = 4.6, min = -.3, max = 18.4, n=20 Mean = 13.7 Med = 13.7, Mode = 8.8, SD = 3.4, min = 8.8, max = 19, n=6
Mean = 11.1 Med = 11.4, Mode = 1.1, SD = 6, min = 1.1, max = 19, n=14 Mean = 13 Med = 12, Mode = 12, SD = 7.3, min = 4.3, max = 24, n=12 Mean = 17.8 Med = 17.8, SD = 1.9, min = 16.4, max = 19.2, n=2
Mean = 4.5 Med = 3.8, Mode = 4, SD = 2.9, min = .8, max = 10, n=18 Mean = 8.9 Med = 7.8, Mode = 6.6, SD = 3.1, min = 6.6, max = 15, n=6
Start basic innovation after starting research-based innovation speed Start intermediate innovation after starting advanced innovation speed
Start intermediate innovation after starting research-based innovation speed Start advanced innovation after starting research-based innovation speed
N=1, Speed = 11.2 Mean = 4.3 Med = 3.9, Mode = 2, SD = 2.4, min = 2, max = 10, n=9 N=1 Speed = 9.2 N=1 Speed = 5.3
Mean = 5.7 Med = 5.3, Mode = .2, SD = 3.6, min = .2, max = 11, n=6
Fifthly, an examination of the length of time at which firms remain at their maximum innovative capability level shows that, on the average, this rate decreases as firms reach higher maximum levels see Figure 9. At the research-based innovative level, this is not surprising as only two firms have reached this level since late 1998. The number and proportion of firms that have remained at their maximum levels for different time length intervals, rather than average time length, are given in Table 6. This table shows that, at the lower innovative capability levels, there is a higher proportion of firms that have remained there longer than the proportion of firms at the higher levels. From Table 6, 10 of 35 firms (29%) that are stuck at the basic and intermediate levels have remained there for six to 13 years.
Figure 9.
7
Average rates (in years) that firms remain stuck at the maximum technological capability level reached
Number of years
basic Intermediate Advanced innovation innovation innovation Maximum Technological Capability Reached
Researchbased innovation
Table 6. Number of firms that remain at different maximum technological capability levels by length of time spent at that level
< 2 years 2-3 years 4-5 years 6-7 years 8-13 years Num of Firms at Maximum Capability Level Basic innovative level 1 0 4 2 1 (12%) 8 (15%) Intermediate innovative level 6 3 8 4 3 (11%) 27 (50%) Advanced innovative level 8 1 6 1 0 (0%) 16 (30%) Research-based innovation 2 0 0 0 0 (0%) 2 (4%)
Key: The arrows represent linkages between the groups of firms Source: derived from the research
I-Link
Innovation links,
interaction is the source of innovation. Here firms already have innovative technological capabilities, and they collaborate in using those to execute
LP-Link
LI-Link
MP-links: Links centred on market transactions LP-links: Links centred on Knowledge flows to learn existing technology LI-links: Links centred on Knowledge flows to learn to innovate I-links: Knowledge links in collaborations in innovation
4 5
2003/2005 MIGHT Innovation Audit Linkages given highest weightage to Innovation (6 weight)
1) Awareness
OVERALL SCATTER PLOT FOR ALL 81 LEADING FIRMS SURVEYED
2) Search
Degree of Awareness of Technology
Innovation must become a way of life, a norm. Only then 6) Acquiring Technology will countries be able to compete against the best in the 7) Implementing Technology world.
8) YABLearning Dato Seri Abdullah Haji Ahmad Badawi
Prime Minister of Malaysia Patron of MIGHT 9) Linking to External Sources
Passive
Strategic
Reactive
63
Digital
Software Engineer
Short Courses
RF
EDA labs
Semiconductor Packaging
Packaging Prototyping Centre Process Innovation Graduate Enhanmentment Program Testing Centre Short Courses Graduate Enhancement Program
Testing
Prototype
IC Chip
MOCCIS, MIMOS
PCB
Testing
Short Courses
SHRDC
Short courses
Education & Training
SHRDC
Voice of Industry
Knowledge Library
Information Dissemination Increase Awareness
EDA tools Prototype facilities link (e.g: Fabs, Packaging & PCB)
MIMs
Innovation & Creativity
Resources
Test facilities
SHRDC
Altera*
MIMOS* Uchi Opto* And many more
IRPA-PR0075 The Development and Production of Advance Semiconductor Packaging On-Site Research work conducted at AIC Semiconductor (www.aicsemicon.com) beginning Dec 2006 for 1 year.
To develop most popular QFN (*TBD) body size lead frame (0.5mm pitch, 0.2mm lead frame thickness).
Using existing AICS lead frame outline that is compatible with existing platform setup Small top die, no spacer & 2 die stack. Target Applications
Applicable for products such as cell phones, PDAs, digital cameras and audio players with smaller and thinner overall system technologies.
Benchmark shows that for QFN packages smaller than 3 mm x 3 mm, Saw singulation is used more widely and the package height is in the range of 0.85 mm to 1.00 mm. There are 50% companies engaged in these QFN packages smaller than 3 mm x 3 mm from the benchmark.
Smaller than 3x3 capability Punch Singulation Saw Package height Singulation (mm) 0.90 0.75 / 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 1.00 0.60 0.80 0.55 / 0.90 0.85 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.80 / 0.90 71 -
Name Amkor ASAT ASE Chung Li ASE Kaohsiung ASE Korea ASE Malaysia Carsem Cypress Fairchild Semi Infineon Intersil Maxim National Semiconductor NEC ON Semiconductor Philips Semiconductor Renesas ROHM STMicroelectronics Texas Instruments
Wafer Backgrind
Wafer Mount
Wafer Saw
FRONT OF LINE
BTM DIE TOP DIE BTM DIE TOP DIE BTM DIE
Wire Bonding
2nd Curing
1st Curing
Molding
Detaping
Laser Marking
C-SAM Monitor
Package Saw
Strip Mount
END OF LINE
72
3/77
Biased HAST/ 5v 130C/85%RH, 33.3psia, 96 Hours Biased PCT/ 5v 121C/100%RH, 33.3psia, 96 Hours Biased 85C/85%RH 1000 hours
3/77
3/77
3/77
3/77
Technology Movement
Market Requirement
ELECTRONICS
SOFTWARE
MECHANICAL
75
A) Hardware Design 1. Image Processor & ADC 2. Inverter Design 3. PCB design & layout 4. Power Supply Design 5. 6. Digital Tuning Receiver System (ATSC, DVB-T) IR Transmitter Design
B) Software Development 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. Image Processing OSD Control for user interface Memory Management Communication Management Power Management
6.
3.
4. 5. 6.
3.
4. 5.
System Integration
Conceptual design
PCB Assembly
Tooling Design 3D For Metal & Plastic Parts Metal Stamping & Injection Molding
by Local Suppliers CTM & Jotech
77
Product design (Benchmark) Prototype building Design review Test and evaluation
Item:A,B,C
Marketing Approval QA approval Manufacturing review
Material Procurement Line Setup Production pilot run Pilot run review Related Testing
Product Review
R&D sign-off and hand-over to Production Department
BOM IQC/OQC check Production Training Approved Parts Specs Approved Vendor List
78
79
19 AD Board (Monitor)
19 TV Board (Monitor)
80
System solution design Engineering design Tools & mould fabrication Plastic injection molding and finishing PCB Assembly and testing Contract manufacturing Surface mount facilities access
81
ANALYSIS FROM 1ST BATCH OF INNOVATIVE SMES 2010 SME INNOVATION AWARD
INNOBIZ-certification in Korea
15,063 14,626
3,500
2008 2/09
Koreas Strategy : Recognise (Certify) & Foster Innovative SMEs into Global Blue-Chip Companies
Technology Fund : 85-95% government guarantee, lower interest rate, longer loan period
(6.9 times)
1st Batch (June 2010) in Malaysia: 1-innoCERT certified companies = 65 -Brief by MIGHT for 25th November 2010
Impact to GDP after Financial Crisis 46% of Koreas GDP is contributed by SMEs
1200
1000
Korea
800
Singapore Taiwan
Law promotion of SME Innovation (2001): 14,626 Korean SMEs have received Innobiz certification (as of end 2008) 1. Manufacturing 2. Services/Non-Mfg 3. Agriculture 4. Construction 5. Environment 6. Biotech 7. Software 8. Design
600
400
200
0 1980 1981 1982 1983 1984 1985 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007
Source : IMF, April 2009
66 5
1-innoCert www.1-innocert.my Online Registration Status By Sector (1st Batch: Feb 25 March 30 2010)
1-INNOCERT WITH TECHNOLOGY INNOVATION RATING For Each Certified Company (Valid For 2 Years) AUDITED SCORES TECHNOLOGY INNOVATION RATING 1-innoCERT CERTIFIED Over 900-1,000 Over 800-900 AAA AA 71 companies audited for 2010 SME Innovation Award 66 5 34
700-800
<700 Over 600-699 Over 500-600 Over 400-500 Over 300-400 Over 200-300
A
NOT CERTIFIED BBB BB B CCC CC
27
5 4 0 0 1 0
Over 100-200
0-100
C
D
0
0
4 5 4
3 4 4
24 23
23 23
2010 SME Innovation Award: 1st batch 1-innoCERT Audit Result from 71 audited companies (70 SMEs, 1 LLC), Average Score = 803.93 / 1000
20 15 10 5
Frequency
100
150
200
250
300
Management of Innovation 20 15 10 5 0
Management of Innovation Mean 201.9 StDev 43.34 N 71 Outcome & Result of Innovation Mean 141.8 StDev 30.06 N 71
120
160
200
240
280
2010 SME Innovation Award : 1st Batch 1-innoCERT Onsite Audit Results from 71 audited companies by Survey Sector Manufacturing has highest AA and A
2010 SME Innovation Award 1st Batch 1-innoCERT Onsite Audit Results
2010 SME Innovation Award: 1st Batch 1-innoCERT Onsite Audit Results from 71 audited companies by Award Category Manufacturing Award Category has highest AA and A
2010 SME Innovation Award: 1st Batch 1-innoCERT Onsite Audit Results
Impact Analysis
Appraisal of Innovation Policy Measures to Foster Innovative SMEs
(Based on Korean & Malaysian experiences)
99
101
102
Source: Economic Impacts of Innovative SMEs and Effective Promotion Strategies, 2009
103
Source: Economic Impacts of Innovative SMEs and Effective Promotion Strategies, 2009
104
Source: Economic Impacts of Innovative SMEs and Effective Promotion Strategies, 2009
106
108
METHODOLOGY Background
1nnoCERT adapts Koreas Innobizs Technology Innovation Evaluation System to Recognise, Certify & Foster Technologically Innovative SMEs (however, 1-innoCERT is open to all companies incorporated in Malaysia)
Singapore (i-SPRING) has similar Innovation Certification i-Class (Innovation-Class)
109
110
TECHNOLOGY INNOVATION EVALUATION SYSTEM: - based on OECD (2005) OSLO Manual V3 which accommodates service industries & non-technological innovation:
1. 2. 3. Product innovation (goods and services) Process innovation (in making or supplying goods and services) Marketing innovation (first use of methods to influence demand)
4.
Definitions of Innovation
An innovation is the implementation of a new or significantly improved product (good or service), or process, a new marketing method, or a new organisational method in business practices, workplace organisation or external relations.
Degrees of Novelty
new to the firm. new to the market (firm and competitors) new to the world (optional for surveys) radical or disruptive innovation (optional but impractical)
Innovation Activities
All scientific, technological, organisational, financial and commercial steps which actually, or are intended to, lead to the implementation of innovations. Some innovation activities are themselves innovative, others are not novel activities but are necessary for the implementation of innovations. Innovation activities also include R&D that is not directly related to the development of a specific innovation.
Dr Norlela Ariffin, ISTIC 2011
3,500
2008 2/09
Koreas Strategy : Recognise (Certify) & Foster Innovative SMEs into Global Blue-Chip Companies
Technology Fund : 85-95% government guarantee, lower interest rate, longer loan period
(6.9 times)
1st Batch (June 2010) in Malaysia: 1-innoCERT certified companies = 65 Dr Norlela Ariffin, ISTIC 2011
Impact to GDP after Financial Crisis 46% of Koreas GDP is contributed by SMEs
1200
1000
Korea
800
Singapore Taiwan
Law promotion of SME Innovation (2001): 14,626 Korean SMEs have received Innobiz certification (as of end 2008) 1. Manufacturing 2. Services/Non-Mfg 3. Agriculture 4. Construction 5. Environment 6. Biotech 7. Software 8. Design
600
400
200
1980 1981 1982 1983 1984 1985 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007
Source : IMF, April 2009
www.1-innocert.my
Global Company
3rd Step (Optional): Pre-Certification Coaching for those who does not meet minimum requirement
1)
2nd Step: Onsite Audit by registered Innovation Auditors comprising of Innovation Experts & Domain Experts
1-innoCERT
3)
4)
5)
1st Step:
Online Innovation Self-Assessment
11/7/2012
122
Benchmarking Audit & Certification Fees (for 2nd Batch Applicants in September 2010)
No Item Innobiz Korea 360,000 won (RM 9K) 600,000 won 1,200.000 won (18K36K) MIGHT SIRIM Jab 1-innoCERT Standard Online RM 500 -1000 registration = FREE Audit Fees ISO 9001:2008 3500 RM 3k Assessment till Audit about RM24-35K Awareness Program RM 10 -12K Documentation RM 15-25K Internal Audit RM 10 15K Audit Fees Request for ReCertification Fees for Re-Audit or Additional Audit n/a n/a n/a n/a 600 100 Organisation I-Class Innovation Class Singapore 2nd Batch proposal Online registration = FREE Onsite Audit Fees RM5k
Registration
Fees
The application fee for both single and integrated assessments is $2000. The application fee covers one day of site visit. The fee may vary with the number of extra site visit days. The fee chargeable for each extra day of site visit is $1,000 per day For new applicants of SQC who achieved the certification, an additional certification fee of $3,000 is chargeable after certification. This does not apply to SQC renewal applicants.
n/a
n/a
Software
1
Manufacturing
Biotech
Total of 8 Sectors
126
Score
50 69 31 94 56 300 111 81 108 300 90 75
Evaluation Results
Remarks
35 200
50 110 40 200 1000
Software
Scores Applicable Sections
Environment
Scores Applicable Sections
Manufacturing
Scores Applicable Sections
50 69 31
50 85 30
42 46 42
50 85 -
94
56 300
89
46 300
76
44 250
105
60 300
111
81 108
128
22 150
87
120 93
90
130 80
Total
Management's ability to innovate Technology Innovation Management Ability Ability to respond to changes in circumstances CEO's sense of value Total Outcome of the technology competitiveness progress Technology Innovation Results Outcome of technology management Outcome of technology achievement (estimates) Total
300
90 75 35 200 50 110 40 200
300
91 74 35 200 56 88 56 200 1000
300
110 100 40 250 50 110 40 200 1000
300
91 74 35 200 50 110 40 200 1000
128
Construction
Scores Applicable Sections
NonManufacturing
Scores Applicable Sections
Professional Design
Scores Applicable Sections
40
42
32
50
66
84 60 250 52
66
82 60 250
53
67 48 200
82
104 64 300
81
77
67
45
103 200 136 111 53 300 63 152 35 Total 250
113
106 300
44
129 250
17
166 250
112 93 45 250
113 93 44 250
61 99 40 200 1000
129
Mark Allotment
30 20 50 17 13 11 9 11 6 Items 8 69 16 15 6 Items 31 15 18 13 34 14 94 14 14 14 14 4 Items 9 items 56 300
Sub-Total 2.1 R&D Organization management and control Is there an exclusive R&D organization Standard of creative development environment
Control of R&D personnel Record of conducting Government research projects 2.2 Collaborative relationships with external technology institutions Collaborative research with Research Institutes
3. Management of Technology 3.2 Capability to supplement their technology Technology development manpower education system Innovation Sub-Total 4.1 Can they get research equipments easily if not easily attainable, can they fabricate themselves. 4.2 Quality of manpower 4. Technology Accumulation System Capability of R&D personnel based on their personal history Capability of R&D personnel based on their research records 4.3 Actual record of technology development and commercialization 4.4 Technology retention and application system Sub-Total 5.1 External environment analysis 5.2 Medium and long term strategy setup 5. Technology Analysis Capability 5.3 Analysis of internal resources Sub-Total Grand Total : Actual record of technology development and commercialization Technology retention and application system
What is the form of collaboration Sub-Total 3.1 Technology Innovation Performance Capability Technology Innovation Performance Capability
5 Items External environment analysis Medium to long term development strategy for technology development analyse internal resources Analyse marketability of the technologies possessed
130
Conceptual Overview
(4 Criteria / Index)
131
Ability to secure research equipment Quality of Human resources Records of Technology Development and Commercilazation Technology accumulation & utilization System
External Environment Analysis Medium-long term strategy setup Analysis of internal resources
Marketing Ability
Capacity to Plan for New Product New Product development Capacity Core Technology Supplement
Product Manufacturing Capability Quality Control Manufacturing Process Innovation Procurement and outsourcing control
Ability to set up and carry out marketing strategy Competitiveness Analysis Management commercialization of technology
Ability to respond to new technology development trends Ability to respond to the trends of new business & new technology by competitors Medium & long term new business & technology development plan Ability to respond to the changes of market/policy environment
Acquisition of IP right and influential effect Forecast Technology Transfer Sale Effect of utilization of technology accumulation
You must Register to Receive your Log-In Password which will be emailed to your email address stated within 1 min (check your spam or junk folder in case of delay) Before You Can Take the Online Self-Innovation Assessment
Company Profile: Important to Select the Correct Award Category, Sector, and Business Category
Company profile
Assessment Sectors
(Sector CANNOT be changed once you have chosen in your company profile)
General Sectors:
Specific Sectors:
Biotech, Design, Software/ICT, Agriculture, Environment (sustainable development, renewable energy, etc), and Construction.
2010
2009
2008
* 751% R&D Investment vs. sales in average for 2009 and 2008
1.2.1 What is the yearly average R&D Manpower Ratio against the total employee for last 2 years?
Answer: B. 10% ~ less than 20% (on-line answer) A. 20% or more (Actual evidence provided) Evidence:
This does not include 3 senior expatriate in-house R&D engineers from partner, FUJIPOLY (Japan)
Contd 1.2.1
Engineer Logesh
Vacant
Vacant
Continue: Example of how to answer and prove evidence during Onsite Audit
Contd 1.2.1
R&D Manager
Soo Yit Fong
Design
Sr. Engineer 1
Soo Sing Goh
Technician (Vacant)
Continue: Example of how to answer and prove evidence during Onsite Audit
2.2.1 How many projects have been completed for the last 2 years in joint/ contract/ cooperative research or advisory worth with outside research institutions or universities related to commercialization of technologies Answer: A. 3 Projects or more
Evidence:
1. LED Array in collaboration with Bridgelux - DSEMs LED array are High Power Light engines at less than 1/10th of the size of the conventional LED array. With this , we have reduced the Carbon footprint of manufacturing this product.
Contd 2.2.1 2. Solar CPV (Concentrator Photovoltaic) Receiver in collaboration with Solarmation DSEM is the first in Asia to embark on this project. CPVs will reduce the footprint of solar cell plants.
Diode (DVM)
QUESTION NO 8: THE ABILITY TO CONDUCT TECHNOLOGY INNOVATION (EITHER IN-HOUSE OR EXTERNALLY) IN ORDER TO GAIN NEW BUSINESSES SUCCESSFULLY?
Innovation
1 2 3 4 5
Project Name
Sumandak Central Processing Platform (SUPG-B), 1st Platform with 6 legged in Malaysia. Sumandak Central Processing Platform (SUPG-B) is integrated platform Sumandak Central Processing Platform (SUPG-B) having 8 risers Sumandak Tepi Satellite Platform (SUJT-C), 2nd Platform with monopod in Malaysia Sumandak Tepi Satellite Platform (SUJT-C), transportation vertical instead of horizontal
Year
2007 2007 2007 2007 2007
6
7 8
Sumandak Tepi Satellite Platform (SUJT-C), design with no of well is 6 more than normal
Bunga Tulip Platform (BTA), 1st Platform with monopod in Malaysia Bunga Tulip Platform (BTA), transportation vertical instead of horizontal
2007
2005 2005
9
10 11 12 13
2005
2005 2009 2009 2009
Example of how to answer and prove evidence during Onsite Audit NOTE: Open original file first
Example of how to answer Process Flow and prove evidence during On-Site Audit at the Manufacturing facility
Climatic Test Chamber ( 2 units, Votsch & ACS ) Temperature Cycling Chamber ( Air to Air ) ( 2 units , Votsch & ACS) Hirayama Hastester Eeprom Burn-In Chamber Heraeus Bake Oven
Non-destructive Analysis
Stereo Microscopy (Low Power) Crack inspection Package defect High Power Microscopy Die defect inspection X-Ray analysis Mold/ Epoxy void Scanning Acoustic Microscopy Die/ Leadframe delamination Curve Trace / Micro Probing Electrical failure validation Scanning Electron Microscopy Die defect inspection Electron Dispersive X-Ray Contamination element analysis
- Contamination inspection - Wirebond/ die attach defect - Contamination inspection - Wirebond defect - Die Crack
- Package inspection
- Element confirmation
Assembly
Yield
Cycle Time
Quality (PPM)
50 10
Contd 2.3.2 Evidence/Explanation: The company are implementing Statistic Process Control method
EXAMPLE: 3.2.1 How big will an impact on the import substitution for the next 3 years, as a result of commercializing the technology's strongest elements of competitiveness? Answer:
Answer: B. Able to substitute more than 20% of current import amount Evidence/Explanation: Companys platform requires many SMEs and new SMEs to support. 70% of outsourcing has been done locally.
Manufacturing
23
2
3
Services
Agriculture & Biotech
36
16
21
9
Halal TOTAL
105
71
AWARD WINNERS
Best Innovation Award in Technology (Manufacturing Sector) SUBSEA EXPLORE SERVICES (M) SDN BHD Best Innovation Award in Technology (Agriculture Sector) TT BIOTECHNOLOGIES SDN BHD Best Innovation Award in Green Technology & Energy Efficiency DEVICE SEMICONDUCTOR SDN BHD
Company
Organization Description