Professional Documents
Culture Documents
By B. Mohan Kumar Associate Professor, Aurora P.G. College, Moosarambagh, Hyderabad. Email: bmk_sap@hotmail.com
Abstract
Branding has emerged as a top management priority in the last decade due to the growing realization that brands are one of the most valuable intangible assets of the firm. The functional and attribute based orientation is used for product positioning whereas brand positioning is based on emotional associations. It is a process to associate the brand with some unique emotional elements compared to competitors in consumers perception. Positioning strategies frequently aim to associate brands with masculine or feminine personality traits. Consumers draw on these gender dimensions of brand to enhance their own degree of masculinity or femininity when they use brands. This conceptual article looks at the process of positioning the brand on the basis of gender and explains its long term implications on the brand.
Introduction
Branding has become more popular as it helps the companies to create instant brand awareness, build brand image. All products need a branding endeavor to beat their competitors and draw the attention of the customers. Many marketing connoisseurs have appreciated the fact that brands are the vital blocks in building and upholding competitive advantage in the market place. If companies want to be ahead of such competition, it is essential that they play a proactive role in determining the customers perceptions and their products acceptability in the customers mind. Hence effective branding is prerequisite in todays competitive business scenario. Gender-based branding means positioning of products and services exclusively to men or women as the case may be. It is now widely recognized that men and women have different requirements, and they demand products in a different manner based on characteristics, features, quality, and quantity, and hence a brand being positioned universally is an outdated concept. The latest trend in the markets in the developed nations has been to position products and services by making them exclusive to each gender based on their desires. The concept has well been accepted in developed nations, but as for India it is yet to make a definitive mark.
dominant customer characteristics as their user imagery for building sustainable competitive advantage. Branding based on gender means imbuing it with a masculine or feminine image and identity. With gender specific brands, the visible design features, distribution, advertising and brand promotions are modified to include symbols and imageries, which identify the brand mainly with one gender.
Review of Literature
Many studies have given insights about gender difference in building relationships with brands. The results revealed by these studies magnify the role of gender in judgment of a brand. Product involvement differs as per the demographic profile of people which is the major factor influencing purchase decision of the product also indicating gender perspective. Some of the studies are Alreck, Settle, and Belch (1982) found that men tend to exaggerate the differences in brands more markedly than women. Men are found to perceive a masculine brand to be more masculine and a feminine brand to be more feminine.
Bem (1983) found that gender, if mediated through representative gender-specific adjectives, can spontaneously be ascribed to brands. He even found that the majority of people are able to spontaneously assign a certain attribute to a certain gender.
MacInniss (1986) conceptualization of functional and symbolic brand concept is useful in examining gender effect on brands Meyers-Levy (1989) developed a framework to analyze, evaluate, and understand gender brand awareness is the Selectivity Model. According to the Selectivity Model, males and females process information, e.g., advertising messages, differently. While males use selective information processing that is heuristic and schematic, females use more comprehensive processing that is an effortful, detailed elaboration. Murphy (1990) describes brands personality of the users with particular lifestyle. He perceives brand not only as the actual product, but also the unique property of a specific owner. It has been developed over time as a set of values and attributes which significantly differentiate products of similar appearance. Fischer & Arnold (1994) demonstrated correlation between the gender-specific consumer behavior and brands possessing feminine or masculine traits. Gender affects consumer behaviors in quite many crucial decision making stages and influences specific usage patterns of a particular brand Keller (1998) argues that some brands in the marketplace possess certain gender-specific associations so that consumers associate the individual brands user as specifically from either sex. Pecheux & Derbaix, (1999) stresses that the brands are bought with different mindset, outlook, and sensitivity according to the gender. Govers & Schoormans (2005) emphasized the symbolic meaning of products increasingly affects consumers purchasing decisions and brand preference and is of importance. The way a product's symbolic meaning is conceptualized from a managerial perspective and the
manner in which its symbolic meaning is eventually perceived differs, and is hence addressed through the distinction between brand identity and brand image. Grohmann (2008) defined gender dimension of brand personality as the set of applicable and relevant human personality traits associated with masculinity and femininity.
Conclusion
In todays rapidly changing business arena and highly volatile market, corporate are progressively turning to branding as a differentiator to lure the consumers. Branding based on Gender is highly effective technique to create a unique brand positioning and brand personality for the brand. But it has to be handled with care and one should try to analyze the situation and the gender role stereotype before making a decision about branding based on gender. The changing dynamics of the consumer behaviour and market demands have made marketers to provide innovative positioning strategies. The end results of such branding activities are increased brand awareness which in turn generates brand equity and surplus revenue. In short, branding has become the Holy Grail of an organization today.
References
Aaker, J. L. (1997), 'Dimensions of Brand Personality'. J ournal of Marketing Research, vol. 34, no. 3, pp. 347-356. Alreck, P.L., Settle, R. B and Belch, M.A. (1982), Who Responds to Gendered Ads, and How? Journal of Advertising Research, 22, 25-32 Batra, R. Lenk, P. & Wedel, M. (n.d.), 'Separating Brand from Category Personality' , unpublished material, Stephen M. Ross School of Business, University of Michigan
Bem, S.L. (1993), The lenses of gender: Transforming the debate on sexual inequality, London, Yale University Press. Fischer, E. & Arnold, S. J. (1994), 'Sex, Gender Identity, Gender Role Attitudes, and Consumer Behavior'. Psychology & Marketing, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 163-183. Govers, P. C. M. & Schoormans, J. P. L. (2005), 'Product personality and its Influence on consumer preference'. The Journal of Consumer Marketing, vol. 22, no. 4, pp. 189197. Grohmann, B. (2008), 'Gender Dimensions of Brand Personality'. Journal of Marketing Research, vol. XLV, pp. 1-59. Keller, Kevin Lane (1998), Strategic Brand Management- Building, Measuring, and Managing Brand Equity, Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall. MacInnis, D. J (1986) Strategic brand concept-image management Journal of Marketing, Vol XXLIII , PP 135 - 145 Murphy (1990), Assessing the value of brands. Long Range Planning, 23(3), 23-29. Meyers-Levy, Joan (1989). Gender Differences in Information Processing: A Selectivity Interpretation. In Patricia Cafferata and Alice M. Tybout (Eds.), Cognitive and Affective Responses to Advertising (pp. 219-260). Lexington, MA: Lexington Press. Pecheux, Derbaix. (1999). Attitude toward the Brand: A New Measurement Scale. Journal of Advertising Research, July-August, 19-27