Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Abu Bakarr Dizo-Kamara, A200 515 968 (BIA Jun. 8, 2012)

    Uploaded by

    Immigrant & Refugee Appellate Center, LLC
    214 views2 pages
    In this unpublished decision, the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) remanded the case for further proceedings because the Immigration Judge did not prepare a separate decision on the merits, did not clearly explain the respondent's appeal rights, and accepted unsworn testimony from a witness who was not identified in the record. The decision was written by Member David B. Holmes.

    Copyright

    © Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)

    Available Formats

    PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    In this unpublished decision, the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) remanded the case for further proceedings because the Immigration Judge did not prepare a separate decision on the merits, did not clearly explain the respondent's appeal rights, and accepted unsworn testimony from a witness who was not identified in the record. The decision was written by Member David B. Holmes.

    Copyright:

    Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    214 views2 pages

    Abu Bakarr Dizo-Kamara, A200 515 968 (BIA Jun. 8, 2012)

    Uploaded by

    Immigrant & Refugee Appellate Center, LLC
    In this unpublished decision, the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) remanded the case for further proceedings because the Immigration Judge did not prepare a separate decision on the merits, did not clearly explain the respondent's appeal rights, and accepted unsworn testimony from a witness who was not identified in the record. The decision was written by Member David B. Holmes.

    Copyright:

    Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    U.S.

    Department of Justice Executive Office for Immigration Review

    Board ofImmigration Appeals Office ofthe Clerk


    5107 leesb11rg Pike, S11ite 2000 Falls Church, Virginia 22041

    DIZO-KAMARA, ABU BAKARR A200-515-968 3400 CONCORD ROAD YORK, PA 17402

    OHS LIT./York Co. Prison/YOR


    3400 Concord Road York, PA 17402

    Immigrant & Refugee Appellate Center | www.irac.net

    Name: DIZO-KAMARA, ABU BAKARR

    A200-515-968

    Date of this notice: 6/8/2012

    Enclosed is a copy of the Board's decision and order in the above-referenced case. Sincerely,

    Donna Carr Chief Clerk

    Enclosure

    Panel Members: Holmes, David B.

    Cite as: Abu Bakarr Dizo-Kamara, A200 515 968 (BIA Jun. 8, 2012)

    U.S. Department of Justice Executive Office for Immigration Review


    Falls Church, Virginia

    Decision of the Board oflmmigration Appeals

    22041 Date:

    File: In re:

    A200 515 968 - York, PA ABU BAKARR DIZO-KAMARA

    JUN 08 2012

    Immigrant & Refugee Appellate Center | www.irac.net

    IN REMOVAL PROCEEDINGS APPEAL ON BEHALF OF RESPONDENT: Pro se

    ORDER: The respondent appeals from an Immigration Judge's oral ruling rendered on April 24, 2012.

    Matter ofA-P-, 22 l&N Dec. 468 (BIA 1999). Further, while the summary order of the Immigration
    Judge indicates that the respondent waived appeal, the transcript of the final hearing does not reflect the respondent's appeal rights were clearly addressed. Finally, the hearing of that date includes "testimony" of a unswom witness, who was not clearly identified for the record. Given the entirety of circumstances presented, we vacate the Immigration Judge's April 24, 2012, order and remand the record for further proceedings. The parties should be provided the opportunity to present further evidence and argument before the Immigration Judge. We note that bond proceedings are conducted separate and apart from these removal proceedings, and the respondent would have to separately raise any issue regarding his bond before the Immigration Judge. FURTHER ORDER: The record is remanded to the Immigration Judge for further proceedings not inconsistent with this order and for entry of a new decision.

    The record does not reflect that the Immigration Judge entered a separate decision on the merits. See

    FOR THE BOARD

    Cite as: Abu Bakarr Dizo-Kamara, A200 515 968 (BIA Jun. 8, 2012)

    You might also like