Professional Documents
Culture Documents
TABLE 2-1
Chronology of Nursing Theory Development
1955 Virginia Henderson (with B. Harmer) Textbook for the Principles and Practice of Nursing
1966 The Nature of Nursing: A Definition and Its Implication for Practice,
Research and Education
1960, 1968, 1973 Faye Abdelleh (with Beland, Martin, and Matheney) Patient-Centered Approaches to Care
1961, 1990 Ida Jean Orlando (Pelletier) The Dynamic Nurse-Patient Relationship
1971 Imogene King Toward a Theory of Nursing: General Concepts of Human Behavior
Loretta Zderad
1980 Betty Neuman The Betty Neuman health care systems model: A total person approach
to patient problems
1983 Joyce Fitzpatrick Fitzpatrick’s rhythm model: Analysis for nursing science
1984 Patricia Benner From Novice to Expert: Excellence and Power in Clinical Nursing Practice
1989 The Primacy of Caring: Stress and Coping in Health and Illness
human being. “Each discipline singles out certain phe- “Selected Nursing Theories” for a discussion of how
nomena with which it will deal in a unique manner” various theorists address and link the metaparadigm
(Fawcett, 1989, p. 5). The field of biology (the study of concepts.
living organisms) has defined limits and boundaries that Consider for a moment the practice of nursing by a
do not extend into psychology. Similarly, psychology school nurse, an emergency room nurse, and a psychi-
(which is concerned with the behavior of individuals) atric nurse. What is the unifying thread among these var-
does not extend its concerns into the domain of sociol- ious nurses? Although each nurse’s practice is obviously
ogy, which has as its main focus the social behavior of different, they all consider their work as part of the pro-
human beings. fession of nursing because all share the same major con-
The broadly identified concerns of a discipline are cerns. Regardless of the setting or the type of client
defined in its metaparadigm. The metaparadigm con- involved, each nurse is concerned with person, environ-
cepts provide the boundaries and limitations of a disci- ment, health, and nursing. Nursing’s metaparadigm is
pline, identify the common viewpoint that all members shared by all nurses despite differences in their individ-
of a discipline share, and help to focus the activities of ual practices.
the members of that discipline. Disciplines are distin- How is nursing’s metaparadigm different from that
guished from each other by differing metaparadigm of other helping professions? The metaparadigm of
concepts. Most metaparadigms consist of several major medicine focuses on pathophysiology and the curing of
concepts. disease. Nursing’s metaparadigm is broader and focuses
Initial consensus on the metaparadigm concepts in on the person, health, and the environment. Consider a
nursing was achieved in 1984. According to Fawcett physician’s and a nurse’s view of a client who is newly
(1984), the major concepts that provide structure to the diagnosed with diabetes. The physician is concerned
domain of nursing are person, environment, health, and with reducing the client’s abnormal blood glucose val-
nursing. These metaparadigm elements name the over- ues to normal levels, if possible. The physician pre-
all areas of concern for the nursing discipline. Each scribes medications, an exercise regime, and nutritional
nursing theory presents a slightly different view of the counseling in an effort to control blood sugar levels. In
metaparadigm concepts. Refer to the section entitled dealing with the same client situation, the nurse is