Зомби - пипл,

вуду пипл

Fairness Doctrine Opposite

effect

Description Sometimes journalists

Fairness Doctrine was Some considered Fairness decided not to cover
Sometimes it was used as
introduced by Federal Doctrine as a First controversial subjects at all
Communications
a pretext
Amendment violation to avoid the burden of the
Commission in 1949. doctrine.

Goal - to ensure that

broadcast stations
cover controversial
Grace commercial 'The Deficit Trial' directed by Ridley Scott was banned
issues in balanced and
from all major networks including NBC, CBS and ABC. The video was trying
fair manner
to highlight the problem of US financial deficit by picturing gloomy future
According to the president of where the suffering young will judge the previous generation for not taking
American Advertising Federation, care of the debt. By the words of P. Grace, the commercial 'doesn't sell
Or, as states the FCC Report Howard Bell, the doctrine anything 'except common sense'. The reason of the refusal was 'the http://www.museum.tv/archives/etv/F/htmlF/fairnessdoct/fairnessdoct.htm
Concerning General Fairness The right of the public to 'constitutes enforced censorship controversy' of the subject, even though, apparently, the networks would
Doctrine Obligations of Broadcast be informed is more and that's antithetical to the First have a hard time finding the opposite party, which would claim the benefit of
Licensees : licensees must 'provide
coverage of vitally important
important than the right History Amendment'. the deficit. Encyclopedia of television
of a station to air only By Horace Newcomb, Museum of Broadcast Communications
controversial issues of interest in FCC has been created
licensee's opinion. Contributor Horace Newcomb
the community served by by Communication http://www.pbs.org/now/politics/fairness.html
Act. Edition: 2, illustrated
licensees ... and a reasonable Published by CRC Press, 2004
opportunity for the presentation of ISBN 157958411X, 9781579584115
contrasting viewpoints on such

ces
2697 pages
issues'.
Content of

Sour
http://arstechnica.com/old/content/2007/01/8640.ars
Fairness Doctrine, Made Grace question 'Are
included series of rules This doctrine has the airwaves really free?' Airwaves: a collection of radio editorials from the Golden Apple
continued tradition of By William O'Shaughnessy
regulations in Edition: illustrated
communication field. Mayflower Doctrine
introduced in 1940 by FCC Published by Fordham Univ Press, 1999
actually prohibited any kind ISBN 0823219046, 9780823219049
of editorialization, which
included even the choice of
topics for local news.
In most cases broadcasting
Personal Attack Rule Overturned in 1949 by companies still provide the variety
in 1967 Political Editorial FCC.
Section was added of points of view on the given
Communication Act of subject even without regulation Democracy and the mass media: a collection of essays
1934, which was
adopted to offer "equal being imposed on them. By Judith Lichtenberg
Contributor Judith Lichtenberg
opportunity'' for political
Edition: reprint
candidates.
Published by Cambridge University Press, 1990
ISBN 0521388171, 9780521388177
Fairness Doctrine was
If a station editorialized in favour
introduced by Federal
or against a candidate, it had to
Communications
notify every candidate for that
office and provide them an In 1967 FCC issues formal rules
Commission in 1949.
Opinion
opportunity to reply developping on Personal Attack Science, Technology, and the First Amendment: Special Report
Cases Rule and Political Editorial Section. By Office of Technology Assessment, United States, Congress
The station is now oblliged to notify With the proliferation of media Published by DIANE Publishing
the attacked party and provide the ISBN 1428922865, 9781428922860
Michael J. Zarkin in his book 'The sources there is no risk of scarcity
Federal Communications Commission' response airtime within a week.
mentions that in 1964 accusations of
and domination of the singular
of F.J. Cook in lying about public official opinion anymore, which were
and compassion to the Communist
Party by a member of clergy B.J. Hagris
among the reasons why the The Federal Communications Commission: front line in the culture and regulation wars
were transmitted by WGCB station. Fairness Doctrine has been created. By Michael J. Zarkin
F.J.Cook requested airtime to respond Edition: illustrated, annotated
to the attack, but was refused. After Published by Greenwood Publishing Group, 2006
that he petitioned to FCC, who ordered The fairness doctrine ISBN 0313334161, 9780313334160
WGCB to satisfy his request. In 1985 FCC president Fowler was simply FCC policy, With web 2.0 user generated content, and 378 pages
admitted that scarcity was no
longer an issue and Fairness
not a federal law. when most people would go online for news
Doctrine does not help in and choose the source that would align with
encouraging the covering of his or her position, there is not much sens in New York Magazine
controversial issues. Feb 10, 1986
WGCB owner, Red Lion Broadcasting, Fairness Doctrine nowadays. Especially, 124 pages
brought the case to the court, claiming
Fairness Doctrine being a violation of the
taking into account that in the situation of Vol. 19, No. 6
First Amendment. The court decision media abundance it is rather limiting the ISSN 0028-7369
was that 'it is the right of viewers and Published by New York Media, LLC
listeners, not the right of the
freedom of speech than enhancing as the
broadcasters, which is paramount' and 80s have proven.
Fairness Doctrine serves for a public
good, because radio is a scarce Finally, in 1987 Fairness Doctrine
resource. was abolished by FCC by Syracuse
Peace Council decision which
refered to the case of WTVH
station accused in violation of the
doctrine by broadcasting
commercials for an new nuclear
plant without providing opposite
views.

Omnia
Love, love will tear us apart...
tempus
Since this time there were three
habent
attempts to reinstate the doctrine,
The Court of Appeals in Columbia however, neither has been
District in Syracuse Peace Council successful. The Personal Attack
v. FCC has stated that Fairness and Political Editorial rules Rule
Doctrine is no longer in public continued to exist until October,
interest, however, it has never been 2000.
II am socially dangerous proved that it violates the First
right now, Especially for Amendment.
the guy who made write
IЕсли меня укусит кандидат технических наук-оборотень...
this stuff