Professional Documents
Culture Documents
SCPC
SatLink System Technical Notes
1. Background
TDM/TDMA and SCPC are the main alternative technologies for satellite networking in the world today. The modem and management technologies underlying both approaches have been advancing rapidly in recent years, causing some confusion as to which technology is better for a given set of networking requirements. This technical note will explain the important trends and trade-offs. These two alternative technologies are illustrated in Figure 1 and Figure 2 for a simple star topology network, highlighting their key elements and configuration differences.
(Time Division Multiplexing with Time Division Multiple Access)
50
100
150
200
In this cost analysis OPEX is the dominant consideration. The reason a TDM/TDMA network is not easily justified when there are just a few sites is due to the fixed capital cost of the Hub for a TDM/TDMA network, which is higher than the cost of a few SCPC modems. In the range of 20 to 50 sites, the total transponder OPEX, plus details of the network traffic patterns and various user requirements, must be examined more closely to determine which technology offers a lower cost of ownership. Using teleport hub services to support a small number TDM/TDMA VSATs can also shift the balance in favor of TDM/TDMA, enabling "virtual private" TDM/TDMA networks with just a few VSATs that replace SCPC with good savings for network operators.
Even video, audio, and voice traffic have peak load timings and magnitudes that are variable throughout the month, the week, and the day. And their loads fluctuate during the peak hour as well. Thus they all benefit from using bandwidth-on-demand which matches actual load requirements second-by-second. This benefit is especially applicable when using the most efficient new codecs for these traditional "real-time" media types, when transporting them over IP links. Furthermore, getting the maximum feasible peak speed for each VSAT site has become very important for all types of IP applications and media. Having just 500 kbps or 1 Mbps per site as the maximum rate in a satellite network is no longer acceptable to most user sites (with a few exceptions). User sites in many satellite networks now demand peak load receive (Rx) rates of 10 to 40 Mbps or more, and peak load transmit (Tx) rates of 3 to 20 Mbps, or more. And these rates are only going to increase in coming years. Higher peak transfer speeds increase the peak-to-average load ratio per site during the peak hour, and therefore greatly favor the trend to use TDM/TDMA and replace SCPC in all forms.
This hybrid configuration is called "TDM/SCPC" for convenience here. If using DVB-S2 it gets the full benefits of statistical multiplexing and ACM on the forward link, but these benefits are non-existent on the return link in this hybrid network . Therefore, the technical and business rationales for using the TDM/SCPC hybrid networks are weak at best. Nonetheless, the TDM/SCPC hybrid configuration is commonly promoted and used in certain types of VSAT networks, in particular in cellular backhaul networks and in some other types of networks where fast access to large amounts of capacity for the return link (upstream) traffic must be guaranteed. There are three possible reasons for the continued use of this form of SCPC: A belief that SCPC ("continuous mode" ) will provide better modem efficiency (in bps/Hz) than TDMA burst mode due to lower overhead and ability to use higher-rate, more efficient MODCODs. A belief that SCPC links are better at providing guaranteed capacity and will operate more reliably against rain fades, interference, or congestion. A belief that SCPC links will provide lower latency or less total delay. A belief that SCPC links can be operated at a higher speed, when necessary, for any or all sites within the satellite transponder footprint.
These beliefs (or some of them) are true with respect to the limitations of some popular TDM/TDMA technologies. For those technologies, the hybrid TDM/SCPC option is useful and may even be "cost effective" in networks with nearly constant levels of traffic in the peak hour at each site, a consistent peak hour time each day. However, in comparison to SatLink TDM/TDMA networks using the DVB-RCS2 standards, these conditions do not hold true. In fact, the opposite is true. The SatLink DVB-RCS2 implementation exceeds or matches the modem performance
Attribute
Return Link Technology Used MODCODs supported
iDirect's
SCPC Option for Evolution
2D 16-State
(Proprietary)
Yes
No
(Fixed Carrier)
No
(Fixed Carrier)
ACM on Return Link Minimum Return Link Symbol Rate Maximum Return Link Symbol Rate Maximum Return Link Info Rate
(after subtracting TDMA burst overheads for SatLink DVB-RCS2 modems
Yes, included
ACM per TDMA Burst (DVB-RCS2 standard)
(Proprietary)
Yes
24 Mbps
24 Mbps
24 Mbps
14 Mbps
15.6 Mbps
(for X5 router)
20 Mbps
(for 8000 series)
Return Link SNR required for same bps/Hz & error rates
(after all overheads)
+/- 0.3 dB
vs. SatLink
+/- 0.3dB
vs. SatLink
1. 6 to 2.6 bps/Hz
Best
(with ACM)
Good
Poor, or will reduce efficiency & speed (without ACM) same as SatLink (at 512 kbps & QPSK w/ 438 byte payload)
<40% of COMTECH
16 milliseconds
(at 512 kbps & 16QAM)
NOTE: We assumed here the COMTECH modem is configured to use their VersaFEC, which is required if
The COMTECH CDM-625 modem is normally used in a traditional SCPC network where both forward and return links are SCPC. COMTECH also has the CDM-840 modem, with similar SCPC specs, but which works with a central site DVB-S2 TDM modem for the forward link in multi-site multiplexed basis (i.e., TDM/SCPC hybrid). The iDirect SCPC option can be used on any iDirect VSAT in their Evolution product line (with the DVB-S2 forward link) and that VSAT may be part of an iDirect TDM/TDMA network, managed from the same NMS. Sections below further explain the key points of Table 1 and why SatLink TDMA burst modems using DVB-RCS2 match or exceed the SCPC modem performance of these two suppliers.
4.1
SatLink DVB-RCS2 burst modems are the first to provide high-order MODCODs (i.e., both 8PSK and 16QAM) with the newest, most advanced FEC (Forward Error Correction) technologies using 16-state turbo codes for industry-leading efficiency and total performance, with carrier spacing of only 1.12x symbol rate. Furthermore, this is done to work at symbol rates up to 8 Msps, and IP throughput rates up to 24 Mbps on Tx (from VSAT-to-Hub) on TDMA burst mode carriers. These rates are more than 4x higher than many TDMA burst modems. And they work concurrently with all TCP acceleration, IP routing, IP packet filtering, and QoS features operating at these same speeds. SatLink DVB-RCS2 burst modems are also the first and only to support both ACS and ACM per burst, dynamically adapted to the immediate local conditions at the VSAT at these very high speeds. The combination of all this is powerful and unique in the satellite networking industry. In addition, SatLink DVB-RCS2 modems have excellent signal-to-noise (SNR) requirements, which puts them slightly lower than the very best SCPC modems for the same spectrum efficiency (bps/Hz) and bit error rate results. And they have very low burst overheads. Therefore even after subtracting burst overheads, SatLink modem efficiency matches or exceeds that of SCPC modems, in terms of the bps/Hz and Quasi-Error Free (QEF) performance, at all comparable operating points for SNR (C/N or Eb/No.) (Note: we assume here that the "long-burst" option is used on SatLink's DVB-RCS2 modems, which is fair when comparing with SCPC options. The differences in required SNR vs. these other technologies are typically +/- 0.3 dB, depending on the MODCODs used for comparison. All SatLink efficiency figures in bps/Hz shown have burst overheads subtracted from their nominal efficiency and adjust for carrier spacing differences.)
4.2
Because iDirect has no support for ACM on their SCPC return links, this means it is unlikely they can operate at their most efficient MODCODs (8PSK 4/5 and 6/7). In
Therefore iDirect SCPC links will use QSPK 1/2 to QPSK 4/5 most commonly (requiring SNR levels of 2.2 to 6.0 dB, respectively, during fades). They will have corresponding efficiencies of 0.8 to 1.3 bps/Hz, according to iDirect modem documentation. In contrast, SatLink's modem efficiency in Ku and Ka band will average from 1.6 and 2.6 bps/Hz, by using 8PSK and 16QAM, or 2x better efficiency than iDirect's SCPC, with typical transponders and VSAT configurations. This is because the use of ACM allows "clear sky" link budgets (or nearly so) to prevail for >90% of the time in most regions of the world, greatly increasing average network efficiency across all sites. Furthermore, due to statistical multiplexing of IP traffic, the required capacity of the TDMA carrier group, in Mbps, is much less than the sum of the required SCPC return links would be (typically 2x to 8x less), depending on traffic patterns across the sites.
4.3
When using ACS & ACM within a TDMA carrier group there are advantages not possible when using ACM alone on individual SCPC links. This explains why SatLink's overall link availability will be better than what COMTECH can obtain in any comparable network. The differences will be most noticeable in Ku and Ka band networks where rain fades can be large. With ACS in a SatLink network, it is possible for the Hub to dynamically change the carrier symbol rate used by a VSAT. This is done by selecting a different carrier in the carrier group for its burst. When there is severe local fading at a VSAT, simply reducing the MODCOD with ACM may not be sufficient. Also that reduces bandwidth efficiency. With ACM and ACS working together in a SatLink network, the MODCOD and the symbol rate for a VSAT can both be reduced during a severe fade. This allows the VSAT's return link to keep operating during the most severe fade (albeit at a lower information rate). Maintaining return link connectivity during fades is as important as maintaining forward link connectivity, since all monitoring of the VSAT (including the ACM control feedback for the forward link) relies upon the return link. The lowest link availability, though, will tend to occur when there is no ACM or ACS available, as with the iDirect SCPC link (and by the way, also true with iDirect TDMA 8
4.4
TDMA return link carriers in a SatLink network using DVB-RCS2 standards deliver lower latency than SCPC links. This is accomplished in three ways: Being able to operate at high information rates, up to 24 Mbps, to reduce serialization delays. Using relatively small FEC block sizes (=burst sizes) compared to SCPC modems. For example, only 540 symbols for the "small burst" and 1620 symbols for the "long burst" vs. 4,000 symbols for the FEC blocks used by COMTECH's VersaFEC. Using advanced methods for assigning bandwidth-on-demand so that there are no delays for receiving capacity assignments once activity has begun.
The relatively low information rates common on many SCPC carriers (e.g., 500 kbps to 2 Mbps) used to avoid excessive amounts of dedicated capacity to a single site are often a large source of delays from an end-user perspective when uploading emails, photos, or other large data options. The same is true for the TDM Forward Link carrier in a TDM/TDMA network. It will have much lower latency than each of many SCPC forward link carriers operating lower symbol rates and low information rates.
When compared to SatLink's implementation of DVB-RCS2 for TDMA (i.e., burst mode), the efficiency of DVB-S2 modems are very similar. They are only slightly
10
Sometimes financial justifications can be found for a TDM/TDMA network upgrade even if the network is composed of only 5 sites. The degree of savings will depend on the following: Average load per site (Gigabytes per hour) in the peak hour for Tx and Rx. Degree of randomness in peak hour timing across sites. Mix of traffic types (data, voice, video streaming, video conferencing). Star topology only, or star and mesh topology needs. Link availability requirements during worst month. Satellite band(s) to be used (e.g., C, Ku, X, or Ka band). Geography of the network (e.g., how many sites within tropical vs. temperate vs. arid environments) or sites at low look angles to the satellite. How widely scattered remote sites will be, and whether there will be diverse VSAT antenna sizes, mobile VSATs, or other special site requirements.
STM will assist any potential customer with a fair and detailed analysis, including 11
Bandwidth cancellation options are also available for TDM/TDMA networks, but work in a different manner. The cancellation equipment resides only at the Hub site. This option is not frequently used in TDM/TDMA networks because of the complexities it adds to the network and the large asymmetry in the bandwidth requirements of forward vs. return link capacity. Also the same reasons mentioned above for SCPC networks reduce the attainable gains in TDM/TDMA networks. As noted earlier, using TDM/TDMA (vs. traditional SCPC) can easily reduce the total capacity requirements of a network by 10x due to statistical multiplexing. Therefore saving just 15% to 45% of the SCPC transponder capacity by using bandwidth cancellation is a small reduction vs. saving 90% or more using TDM/TDMA.
12
www.stmi.com
STM Group, Inc. | 2 Faraday | Irvine, CA 92618, USA | T +1 949 273 6800 | FAX +1 949 273 6020 STM Norway AS | Vollsveien 21 | 1366 Lysaker, Norway | T +47 6753 5337 | FAX +47 6753 5335
All specifications and features subject to change without notice. SatLink and the STM logo are a registered trademarks of STM Group, Inc. Document # 200660; Revision B - 130206 2013
13