Moai Crown (E) State Commercial Lien Bill Legal Instruments

Moai God is God Superior Mana Spirit transferred his Earth World Doctrines of Discovery Title Memorial Rock
Earth Statue Dna Image of himself to Moai WaNoa Royal Tahitian African Monarch Sovereign Family Man. Moai Chief of Tenants, Debt Charged Bill Indicted the Fraud Catholic Church Jesuits Satan Devil God, Elizabeth Windsor, Adolfo Nicolas Pachon and Evelyn Rothschild Sole (E)State for using Fraud Means of Stealing Sovereigns Land & Resources serrved this Legal Property Arrest Seizure Warrant for Injuring Gods Sovereign People. US Federal State Military are prohibited of spraying Chemicals in skies here control HAARP Frequency Earthquakes
AOTEA NEW ZEALAND-S FUTURE WEALTH

Moai God Sun Ra First Nations New World Order Estates
Moai Gods Grace Rock Face is Superior Crown Earth Ruler Authority and Administrator as Moai God Copyright Spirit Commercial Lien Title of Moai Wanoa Royal Tahitian-African Male Monarch Sovereign State. Are Inheritors of Gods World Sovereign Peoples Confederation. Holds the Clear Debt Free Allodial Title to all Moai God Crown Land free of Debt, Mortgage, Liens. Moai is the reigning Monarch Power shut down illegal Sole Businesses stealing money from Moai Sovereigns through Corrupt CT Land Titles and Fraud Bank Mortgage No End Date Contracts, Fractional Banking, all Fraud Resource Management Acts of States, Governments Parliaments. In any part in the World Sole Persons using the Fraud Queen Elizabeth II and Pope Crown Alien (E)State Pope Adolfo Nicolas Pachon as their Monarchy Sovereignty Head of State over the Queen who is abdicating with all her aliens who emigrated to Indigenous Native Lands are now Moai Lien Debtors with the Pope, Queen of England, Rothschilds. Moai Crown has Absolute Monarchy Government over Moai God Earth World Authority Ruler Memorial Title Lien in Queen Elizabeth II Great Court London extinguished the Queen of Englands Fraud Royal Family Monarch Title Succession to Prince Charles and her assigns Authority from God Almighty she cant prove ever existed. She swore her Oath to the Jesuit Generals of Pope Pachon and Pope Francis Satan Devil Hell God
The New Honorable s of Moai Aotea Sovereigns E-States
Moai God is God Superior Mana Spirit transferred his Earth World Doctrines of Discovery Title Memorial Rock Earth Statue Dna Image of himself to Moai WaNoa Royal Tahitian African Monarch Sovereign Family Man. Moai Chief of Tenants, Debt Charged Bill Indicted the Fraud Catholic Church Jesuits Satan Devil God, Elizabeth Windsor, Adolfo Nicolas Pachon and Evelyn Rothschild Sole (E)State for using Fraud Means of Stealing Sovereigns Land & Resources serrved this Legal Property Arrest Seizure Warrant for Injuring Gods Sovereign People. US Federal State Military are prohibited of spraying Chemicals in skies here control HAARP Frequency Earthquakes
Beyond The Self Determination of the Sovereigns of Aotea New Zealand

Moai Ancient Mauri brings a Fresh Breath of Air and Mana over our Sovereigns Lands
It is scientist who poisons the air we breathe. Together we shall carve our own political belief future.
When the Moai appears on the new day horizon and Milky Way it is time to preserve the old tradition with the new Moai Power House technology. Without a past there can be no future. We must keep the ancestral inheritance bonds that tie us to our old where we came from to where we go to with certainty of Moai God. That is the role of the Moai Solid Rock face of Gods Grace Superior Authority. To strengthen our bonds that release the peace breath to enable us to come back together from being divided and ruled by a foreign rule alien peoples and bring forth the new world, what you see that has been devastated by the aliens invaders. The first version of this article was completed at the end of March 2013 and is the real God Creation Plan, in process now, right time for release as true and correct. The Moai is the Statue Rock of Mana of important change. To cut through the evil and reveal the Popes Satan Roman Catholic Churchs has hid the truth from you Hoani Kahaki Wanoa Royal Tahitian - African Sovereign Monarch Principle Parent of Moai God Holy Alliance Moai Crown created a new self government with a financial economic development money currency plan CONTENTS 1.0 Laying Down the Challenge to (E)STATE Catholic Pope PACHON & Elizabeth WINDSOR 2.0 Moai Crown State Co Operative Confederation Sovereigns of Aotea New Zealand 3.0 A Brief History of Moai Crown Confederation Government Whakapapa Gods Jurisdction 3.1. The Beginning of Moai Crown Government 3.2. Moai God & Moai Crown International Sovereign States Holy Alliance Governments 3.3. The Protestant Reformation and Sovereignty is now challenged by Moai Crown Royalty 3.4.Moai Crown Royal Tahitian African Sovereign Monarch UK British Settlement Act 1701 3.5Moai Crown State Collection of Taxes 4.0.Moai Crown State Corporation Sole 5.0Moai Oaths are Jurisdictions of Moai God Tohunga Spirit man Confirms Government 5.1Moai Sovereigns Oath came from Moai God Statue Earth Memorial as he is in Heaven 5.2Prime Minister or President of Aotea New Zealand Oath is to Moai Earth God to Heaven 5.3Member of Moai Government swears Oath and Allegiance to Moai God Creator of Earth 5.4. Moai Crown Executive Councilors Oath of Office 6.0Moai Sovereigns House of Moai Gods Tikanga Law Holy Spirit of Honoring Alliance 6.1. Moai Crown Confederation is a World State Government in Aotea New Zealand 6.2.Moai God House of Representatives is National and International Permanent Council 7.0 Moai Governance That Un-slaves People 8.0... Facts about Moai New World Self Government Independent Sovereign State Republics 9.0.Moai Hapu Sovereigns 1835 Declaration of Independence is a Constituted Government 10.0...Moai Hapu Inherits Gods Dna Monarch Sovereign Truth Law Honorable Path Forward 11.0Appendices 11.1... Full Letter from Hoani Wanoa. Moai links his past God Spirit Mana to your new future 11.2...The Mortgage Systems Sole fake person is buried forever in its corrupt fraud corpse 11.3Links
LAYING DOWN THE CHALLENGE 1.0

The challenge for all people is to accept that NA ATUA E WA AOTEA is the true country and not New Zealand. MOAI CROWN is in fact GODS TRUTH LAW system of Corporations Sole known as, MOAI MONARCH IN RIGHT OF AOTEA New Zealand MOAI SOVEREIGN IN RIGHT OF AOTEA New Zealand MOAI WANOA UETAHA HAPU SUPREME IN RIGHT OF AOTEA NEW ZEALANDMOAI CROWN IN RIGHT OF AOTEA NEW ZEALAND- GODS WORLD HERE LIEN CLAIMANT MOAI CROWN IN RIGHT OF AOTEA BRITISH GOVERNMENT ARMS NEW ZEALANDMOAI CROWN Corporation Sole is not a Living Being but a mirror image of the real person. For Corporate business matters MOAI CROWN is a single ('sole') incorporated office, on behalf of Private Co Operative Share Companys of One Billion Shareholders who are Sovereign members of MOAI CROWN State Governments Confederation spread over the worlds Sovereign members Countries. MOAI CROWN has a Billion shares in each participating country that MOAI Hapu Confederation has Membership in as one of 59 STATES registered in UNITED NATIONS & our SEAT on UN COUNCIL as BRITISH STATE, HAPU SOVEREIGNS STATE Contract Single (sole) men or woman CONTRACTORS are affiliated to MOAI as MOAI CROWN occupies Businesses MOAI CROWN has no need for by-laws and no Board of Directors. MOAI gets his JURISDICTION from GOD. The challenge presented in this article is to open your hearts to MOAI GODS TRUTH only and nothing else. It is a challenge that requires you to look deeply at New Zealand Crown Government Corporation Fraud Corrupted systems and processes that have cost you your real freedom and your wealth quality of life that the honesty accountability has never been practiced over 170 years. MOAI CROWN is CLAIMING back on your Sovereigns behalf with GOD. MOAI is to make Crown New Zealand Government pay back the Wealth they stole from you. By using these Fraud and corrupted Practices that we EXPOSE to you now what the QUEEN abdicating is creating FRAUD upon a FRAUD Crime on exiting is difficult to PROVE except in front of MOAI GOD here in front of you. QUEEN ELIZABETH II (Aka) ELIZABETH WINDSOR is now a CONVICTED CRIMINAL on Felony Charges as a Wanted FUGITIVE while still QUEEN. MOAI CROWN has LEGAL ITCCS ICJ International World Court PROPERTY SIEZURE ARREST WARRANTS out on her HEAD now that this Framework is part of as MOAI SOVEREIGN MONARCH STATE! It is near impossible for the current Government to back out of this Legal Impasse as MOAI force the LEGAL WARRANT on the Offending Members of their Corporate (Sole) Person s committing these Heinous Fraud Crimes. As Moai Lien Bill Debt-Charge each Offender who no longer serve this country, MOAI regains your freedom now. Lien Debt Charging is about breaking down Corruption so that it converts to recovered stolen Moaney that will give you as MOAI CROWN Credit of the REAL GOD, teeming with long lost life giving potential. Taken off CROWN Corporate DEBTORS. The Freedom is in the names NA ATUA E WA AOTEA New Zealand or AOTEA NEW ZEALAND-. Can finally emerge as a new and honorable beginning between trusted friends, who smile and work together. To achieve the best outcome for MOAI GOD ALLODIAL TITLE ANCESTRAL INHERITANCE LANDS! Her flora, fauna and her people of AOTEA - REALMS of Eternal SUN GOD RA is the Light new Life Energy Force. Let the Destruction of CROWN Corruption and Fraud Trial by JURY begin to enable the new CREDIT to emerge.
2.0 THE NEW CO OPERATIVES & INCORPORATIONS OF AOTEA NEW ZEALANDThe following diagram is the general illustration of the system of Moai Crown State Co Operative and Crown (Incorporation) you vote for at election time. Once Moai Tidal Energy H2 Hydrogen 1 Billion shares are sold in Aotea New Zealand and the world. Follow the arrows. Read the 2 columns on the left from bottom up first, then read columns on right from top down. Look closely at the language used to describe each sector.
Sec 1 everyone beneath the top level was carrying the burden of the present corrupt fraudulent and illegal New Zealand Government Incorporations! Yes even those in the blue sector. Most politicians and voters have no idea they are supporting this system that MOAI CROWN is now holding to ACCOUNT forced LIEN INDICTING these Politicians since 1835 Moai Hapu Declaration of Independence as a SOVEREIGN STATE. The further down the greater the burden that you saw a Fraud Crown Government of New Zealand, its Corrupt Churches, Popes Bishops Politicians whom wrought the Sovereign People of their Wealth Land and Natural Resources. This is why the Occupy Wall St movement emerged from this ongoing SCAM that MOAI is now EXPOSING to YOU the TRUE SOVEREIGN LAND OWNERS. The 99% at the bottom were growing the wealth of the less than 1% at the top as it STOOD. So MOAI CROWN and all its supporters shall ENFORCE the LIEN BILL PROPERTY SIEZURE ARREST WARRANT on all the AGENTS of the Crown Corporation and ADAPT their PLAN to suit the MOAI SOVEREIGN People of MOAI GODS EARTH WORLD under GODS LAW LORE! You tend to think of government as a single institution, established to govern the affairs of this country on our behalf. You believe that government is of the people, by the people, for the people. Now explore this plan further with MOAI CROWN SOVEREIGN MONARCH as the HEAD OF THE SOVEREIGNS CO OPERATIVE Share Holding System of MOAI Sovereign Governments all Administered all over the WORLD on the same Business Trading Economic Plan where the wealth goes back to the Shareholder Sovereign People directly. Following is a parallel view of the systems of Moai Crown Governments who are joining GODS Sovereign People of the World Worldwide Co Operative system. Now can see that its the Share Membership that is permanent, with no Parliament but a single Moai Crown Government only in each Sovereign State. To look after the membership within each State separate from the present Fraud Corrupted State Government and its Criminals who manage their own Corporate Business separate from the People. You now have an Option to choose to stay with the current Government system which you, as an true Queen voter will be Bill Charge Indicted in a MOAI CROWN. Against Queen of England Sovereign Lien Contract 1st Moai Debtor s. The Queen severed her trust to God, which is her own Jesuits Satan God in Hell.
Sec 2 MOAI CROWN informs you the legacy of the current New Zealand Government and Parliament has never had any one to check them as it all appears credible but closer inspection reveals that Parliament and Government is actually a present and past system of Corporations Sole. Who work together as Natural Live Persons to controlling their Sole Persons to dis-empower and enslave the people of the Land who have not consented to their Birth and Death Certificates and Registrations they have used. Stole saved money from the Sovereign People they made sign to their Agreements without Disclosure. If a Sovereign Person does not did not understand corporate law then you not recognize the Crown New Zealand Government and other States in the Commonwealth bearing the Queens Head and Popes Church Insignia, abused the human rights that you the people consent to when you always voted in ignorance. Or wasnt told that Government is operating a SCAM FRAUD Business MOAI CROWN Confederation accused the QUEEN (E) STATE of FRAUD Bill Charged Debtored her with a LEGAL MOAI LIEN CHARGE INDICTMENT ARREST WARRANT INSTRUMENT! Sec 3 what does all this tells you is the evidence MOAI has now legally validated this SCAM system as fact true and still operating today. Backdated these LIEN DEBT CHARGES to 1835 Declaration of an Independent Sovereign Nation State of Aotearoa New Zealand. MOAI counts how much (E)-STATE Crown Corporation of Rothschild Banks, Queen Elizabeth II, Royal family, Federal States Government, Vatican City, Churches stole form the entire Sovereign People of the World. MOAI CROWN say they Stole 1 Trillion Trillion Pounds in Gold Bullion equivalent, split down to what (E) STATE stole off MOAI SOVEREIGNS in AOTEA New Zealand is 1 Thousand Trillion in Total MOAI CROWN is now Recovering from these Aliens. Include every current or idle retired Crown New Zealand Government Agent, 121 Politicians, 38,000 Public Servants, 2000 Judges, 10,000 Police, 4000 Army, and Airforce staff liable here now must face MOAI CROWN Creditors Assignees one by one, till they all pay the stolen wealth money property back. MOAI Agents are Enforcing WARRANTS next week 9th May 2013 onwards. These are Legal Documents served by Moai Crown States Governments. The following chapters present some historical facts that appear as related dots. This Crown Corporate Fraud Corruption jigsaw puzzle was made of pieces that remained scattered in a state of chaos, until MOAI GOD brought them back together, shows you each piece to where it belongs in the bigger picture you own. Sec 4 the diagrams above are a part of an even greater jigsaw puzzle that MOAI GOD CROWN within you resolves with each and every Sovereign human being, showing high levels of TRUTH AFFIDAVITS that WINS. Wealth is about quality of life food and shelters are basic essentials to any quality of life that the Sovereign People are being deprived of. There was a time in New Zealand when everyone had access to healthy food and shelter. It is also a very safe country where we will smile at each other and help out where we could do. God-zone Moai Gods Own is how you saw our country fail, now see glow with Moai Spirit Face of God Over time a veil came over you. You are still being bullied today, enticed and legislated to go to work and earn a living even if we already lived the good life. We could no longer build a home without taking out a mortgage (death grip). Children were put in factories (schools). Government set criteria for the curriculum. Schools freed parents to join the workforce and God-zone began disappearing. Most people had forgotten a few generations later the good life. Beneath a weight of escalating debt, unprecedented poverty, starving families, over crowded housing, more people sleeping on the streets and under bridges, rampant drug and alcohol abuse, higher unemployment, disabling stress, violent crimes and the list goes on. More people are feeling unsafe in their own homes. Not just one sector of society is impacted. Every sector is affected. What can we do to turn things around? Where did we go wrong?
Moai holds New Zealand Government a& their Queen Elizabeth II Monatchy Crown Liable for 1 Trillion-Trillion Indictment
Sec 5 is it too late? You begin by removing the veil so that you see more clearly the real cause for this change. This will not be scary because fear of more chaos sets in and you want to retreat into our comfort zone as MOAI rocks the (E) STATE (U-boat. MOAI removes their veil to show not just the cause, but also solutions for the return of New Zealand's wealth to her Sovereigns people. However the solutions will require us to step up and take responsibility for it is this very quality you gave away. Today you can be reliant on Moai Government to take responsibility for your lives, which is almost obliterated. You need to use good old common sense, goodwill and guts to replace these foreign aliens legislation. The result had been increased fear and co-dependence. At election time the politicians increased your fear. The message to save more was on every politicians lips last election. They say that if you dont then you will have no money in your retirement years. Most politicians genuinely believe this to be real solutions. On the surface it sounds sensible. But who is using your savings and for what purpose? Who benefits most from your savings is what you should really be asking? What is the return on your investment for giving the bank free use of your money? How much is the bank making? If you get a 5% (wow) return per annum on your deposit who gets 95%? But is that all they get? Why do you have to pay fees for your deposit? Shouldnt it be the other way around? Who owns the bank? The bankers at the top of the hierarchy do, theyre part of less than 1% Both labor and national were endorsing saving at Kiwi Bank a government owned bank. National said all employers would deduct a percentage from employees earnings to go into Kiwi Banks Kiwi Saver account. People can opt out after the fact. Labour said it would go one step further and make Kiwi Saver compulsory. Both parties say it will cover future pensions. How nave does we have to be? Isnt this called tax? Kiwi Saver is a nest egg for government to dip into and use over and over again for the growth and development of its owners agenda. The people of New Zealand do not own Kiwi Bank, they only bank there. The government owns the bank and you now know who owns government. What guarantee will there be in 2, 5, 10 or 20 years that there will be any money for the savers to retire on? You have learned to ask surface questions and rely on certain experts to tell us the truth. You vote without even questioning what is parliament and government really. Many people assume that parliament and government are one and the same. They are not. They do work in tandem but they have a different and co-dependent purpose. Co-dependence is their nature and co-dependence is their outcome. Without people on wages, the dole, and a benefit or in prison, parliament and government could not exist. To survive these systems need employees, beneficiaries, children, and prisoners all with their dysfunctions and codependence. The challenge is now before you and MOAI GOD to run your own Moai Sovereign State Government. For the first time in history you can see the global impact. War, violence, debt, starvation, expanding deserts and widespread floods on your television screens. Dont allow more of the same. You open your hearts to the truth and together find the solutions for peace and a fulfilling quality of life for all.
Es you can see the Crown Consists of a Royal Family Bloodline of Queen Elizabeth II Succeeding to Queen Victoria who comes from the Bastard Kind Edward Blood Line who has an Illegitimate Child. Moai Crown claims the rightful Heir to the Throne is King Michael 1 who is Earl Michael Hastings of Windsor North Castle according to our records. Make the whole Crown Business of Queen Elizabeth 11 as Elizabeth Windsor (German), the Black Pope Adolfo Nicolas Pachon (Spaniard) and Evelyn Rothschild Jew Illegal and Corrupted. Cause for Moai Crown and the Sovereign People of the World to shut down their Crown Businesses called Washington DC, Vatican City, City of London, Buckingham Palace, Her Majesty the Queen in right of New Zealand, and Canada, Australia, and Britain. The New World Order would mean Moai Crown: has Bill Debt Lien Charged wevery single person who has benefited from settling of the Indigenous Natives Lands of those who have the original Historic Land Claims Memorials to those lands. And all other Foreign Alien Memorials reduced back into the Earth it is made of. In the case of Moai Statues and other Ancient Memorials stolen, returned to their own Soil place of origin with the people who built them for their own people to worship!
3.0 A BRIEF HISTORY OF GOVERNMENT

Here in New Zealand it is assumed that the institutes of parliament and government arise from the English model. The following account will bring enlightenment to the heritage of these systems. You can at any stage search the Internet and check out various details for yourself. Do yourself a favor and seek the truth. 3.1. The Beginning of Parliament At the time of the Anglo Saxon Kings, there was an advisory council, the Witenagemot - "meeting of wise men". In 1066 King William 1 of Normandy also known as William the Conqueror invaded England and took the throne through conquest. He replaced Witenagemot, with a Curia Regis - "King's Council". The Curia were the tenants in chief, the few nobles who "rented" great estates directly from the King, along with certain senior ecclesiatic (church) members. The purpose of coming together was to discuss matters pertaining to the Kings Estate. King William kept detailed records of land and property in a Domesday Book Parliamentary debate even today is to do with the Sovereigns (E) State. Perhaps you are thinking that today the Sovereign is Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth 11. Further investigation will reveal another Sovereign is in charge and is not just the Head of (E) State, but also the Head of the Owners. The investigation will also expand your understanding of estate and how you became the property of the Owners. 3.2. The Church and Parliament When William of Normandy conquered England in 1066 he took the title of King and brought with him the doctrine of the Pope and the Roman Catholic Church. A portion of all taxes went to the Church. In 1192 King John inherited the throne. In 1205 he fell out with Pope Innocent 111 for refusing to accept Stephen Langton as the new Archbishop of Canterbury. Pope Innocent appointed Langton to rule England both in religion and in fact. King John retaliated by seizing church revenues. King John and England were ex-communicated from the Church. This meant that England was excluded from participating in the sacraments and services of the Roman Catholic Church. No christening or marriage would be legal. Only christened people would go to Heaven. Children born out of marriage went to Hell. The pressure this placed on the people of England forced King John to surrender England to the Pope. This was ratified by treaty on 3 October 1213. The following is part of a letter from a series of letters written by Pope Innocent to King John leading up to the ratification. [This is the heading to this letter.] Letter from Pope Innocent III, to king John, April 24, 1214
"INNOCENT, BISHOP, SERVANT OF THE SERVANTS OF GOD, TO HIS WELL BELOVED SON IN CHRIST, JOHN ILLUSTRIOUS KING OF THE ENGLISH, AND TO HIS LEGITIMATE FREE-BORN HEIRS FOR EVER."
"The King of kings and Lord of lords, Jesus Christ, a priest for ever after the order of Melchisedech, has so established in the Church. His kingdom and His priesthood that the one is a kingdom of priests and the other a royal priesthood as is testified by Moses in the Law. And by Peter in his Epistle and over all He has set one whom He has appointed as His Vicar on earth. So that, as every knee is bowed to Jesus, of things in heaven, and things in earth, and things under the earth, so all men should obey His Vicar and strive that there may be one fold and one shepherd."
Selected Letters of Pope Innocent III, concerning England

(1198-1216), Thomas Nelson and Sons Ltd., 1956. Page 177 ".... So that those provinces which from of old have had the Holy Roman Church as their proper teacher in spiritual matters should now in temporal things have her as their peculiar sovereign. You, whom God has chosen as a suitable minister to effect this, by a devout and spontaneous act of will and on the general advice of your barons have offered and yield, in the form of an annual payment of a thousand marks. Yourself and your kingdoms of England and Ireland, with all their rights and appurtenances. The Holy Roman Church and to us and our successors, to be our right and our property as is stated in your official letter attested by a golden seal, the literal tenor follows: NOTES Pope Innocent 111 notifies all that the Roman Catholic Church is a kingdom of priests and a royal priesthood. He states that Jesus is a priest of the Church and that the Vicar/Pope represents Jesus and all must bow to and obey him. The Pope clarifies the Church is a woman and a peculiar (unique) sovereign. He says God chose John as a minister of the Church. He further describes the payment and property that John and his barons yield to the Church, papacy and their successors For the full content of the letter see Appendix 1. The powerful English barons rebelled and forced the King to sign the Magna Charta at Runnymede in 1215. The Charta guaranteed the people of England rights that the king could not go back on. Too late, Pope Innocent was not about to relinquish his power easily. Indeed because of his 1213 treaty with King John, Pope Innocent 111 became the de facto (in fact, actual) and de jure (in law, lawful) Sovereign of England. Pope Innocent 111 declared the Magna Charta null and void. Most of us assume that the terms Monarch and Sovereign refer to the Queen of England. We are led to believe that the Queen is our Head of State. The above historical account tells us King John gifted his (E) State (England and Ireland) to the Roman Catholic Church. In light of this lets look again at the hierarchy of parliament and government and insert the name of the real Monarch, Sovereign and Head of (E) State (of New Zealand) today. The powers of the Pope are defined in the canon law of the Church of Rome as, 'The supreme or full power of jurisdiction over the universal Church both in matters of faith and morals and in matters of discipline and government'. When we look at titles used in parliament we see that it is in fact a metaphor for the Church. The powers of Moai God are defined in Tikanga Moai Law of the Pacific as, 'Moai Superior Lore full power of Gods jurisdiction over Moai Earth World Creation matters of faith, morals and discipline government'. Youre witnessing the hidden truth of Gods Tikanga Moai Lore Mana Metaphor for Moai Holy Spirit Alliance Houses
Moai Crown means the giant hat on Moai Head holds the Basket of Knowledge of Higher Intellect Mana Eternal Power, Grace and Spirit of Gods Pure Lore of his Earth Planet and Universe. Wa Noa Royal Tahitian familys built Moai Statues of Gods Face and Body before Wanoa became Hapu Surnames in Aotea New Zealand. God Instructed Tohunga to bury Moai deep in his Earth to Mark it MOAI CROWN points out to you the unwary, that the Catholic Church made its own Powers up making a live Human Bishop prey to God through another man called Jesus. Which you will find is not their white man biblical ancestral Inheritance Inventions of the Obelisk and Pyramids they refer to. These are ancient customs of our own Black skin Man Tahitian built the MOAI STATUE for GOD and Black African Nubian Man built the SUN RA OBELISK to mark GODS SUN Position on GODS WORLD in AFRICA. And the first rising Natural SUN in GODS WORLD at MOKONUI from MOUNT HIKURANGI East Cape AOTEA in New Zealand. These are Accurate HISTORIC Positions on the GLOBE CLAIM stated on the front Cover of this proof of MOAI CROWN STATE SOVEREIGN COURT FRAUD CRIMINAL CROWN CHARGE DEBT LIEN INDICTMENT ARREST WARRANT Claim. Now you have an option here to chose to stay with these CHURCH FRAUDSTERS in their SATAN CHURCHES and CORRUPTED PARLIAMENTS BANKS MILITARY ROYAL FAMILIES OF SIN! Or join with MOAI CROWN and be REAL SOVEREIGNS you are not under the present CROWN CORPORATION and Governments who have screwed your money off you since the CROWN signed the MOAI HAPU and BRITISH GOVERNMENT 1835 DECLARATION OF INDEPENDENCE Contract Agreement! King William IV and MOAI NATIVE HAPU CHIEFS PUHI at Russell, WAITANGI in the Bay of Islands New Zealand. MOAI Tahitian History and the Black NUBIAN History is SUPERIOR to that History of JESUS where the BISHOPS and POPES get their Authority from GOD is a THIRD MAN CONTRACT with a GOD that makes their CONTRACT SUSPECT of the PAPER BIBLES they Refer to! ARE STOLEN MISREPRESENTED, ALTERED by MAN to suit their POLITICAL and RELIGEOUS ORDER! MOAI show you the DEVILS BLACK POPE ADOLFO NICOLAS PACHON CATHOLIC CHURCH OATH and you draw your ALLEGIANCE to this POPES GOD is this POLITICAL ANIMAL usurps the man called JESUS the ROMANS scorned who is only 2013 years OLD in todays time, HEDGE ALL his BETS ON! MOAI is our WANOA ROYAL TAHITIAN Carvers Builders STATUE OF GODS FACE and the BLACK NUBIAN MAN SUN RA OBELISK Carvers Builders is our MEMORIALS to GOD ALMIGHTY Direct! No MIDDLE MAN Like a POPE, BISHOP, JESUS, POLITICIAN, just straight to GODS STONE FACE through our MOAI MALE TAHITIAN-AFRICAN DNA SOVEREIGN BLOODLINES, NATIVE DESCENT, BELIEFS, CUSTOMS, PROCESSES AND PRACTICES which can never be severed, superceded, FIXED into our ROCK MEMORIALS! MOAI CROWN STATE CONFEDERATION SOVEREIGN MONARCH WANOA UETAHA HITORANGI HAPU CHIEF through the JUSTICE INTERNATIONAL WORLD COURT OF JUSTICE ICJ and ICCST INTERNATIONAL CRIMES OF CHURCH AND STATE TRIBUNAL. ENFORCED A LEGAL MOAI CROWN STATE COURT BILL CHARGE DEBT COMMERCIAL LIEN INDICTMENT ARREST WARRANT on NATURAL Persons & CORPORATE SOLE names. For Crimes committed first by THE INCORPORATION OF NEW ZEALAND- advertise in this LIEN INDICTMENT NOTICE, THE MONARCH, HEAD OF (E)STATE, ALL CHURCHS, MINISTERS, HONORABLES, THE POPES, BISHOPS, ARCHBISHOPS, PRIESTS, STATES PARLIAMENTS, POLITICIANS, SOVEREIGN GOVERNOR-GENERALS, THE SOVEREIGN POPE. THE QUEENS SOVEREIGN, PRIME MINISTERS, CABINET MINISTERS, PRESIDENTS OF STATES, CABINET MINISTERS OF STATES, MEMBERS OF PARLIAMENT, CROWN AGENTS, POLICE, MILITARY, AIRFORCE, ARMY, FBI, CIB, LAWYERS, BARRISTERS, BAR ASSOCIATION. JUDGES, QUEEN COUNSEL, PUBLIC VOTERS OF PARLIAMENTS, CITIZENS, SUBJECTS, ALL EMPLOYEES OF CROWN STATE, IWI, OTHERS ADDED AND AMMENDED FROM TIME TO TIME IN FUTURE!
10
The total amount that MOAI CROWN STATES charged these ALIEN INVADERS OFFENDERS is one trillion trillion British Pound Sterling GOLD BULLION Currency! Includes Bill Charge LIENS against every CROWN CONRACTOR AGENT of County Councils, District Councils Lawyers who colludes with Court Judges wrought the System. New Zealand Parliament has for over a hundred years had NO ACCOUNTABILITY to ANYONE until now today. MOAI Shows you for the first time in the history of this country just what they have been doing to Citizens all this time stealing the Wealth for them selves explained to you in their AOTEAROA NEW ZELANDS WEALTH Shinning a Light on Freedom A New and Honorable Partnership! Offenses witnessed by1Billion + facebook, twitter, google, youtube fans MOAI LEGAL LIEN INDICTMENT CLAIM SIEZURE WARRANTS So no matter what the Church, Popes, Bishops, Politician, Royal Families, Bankers of Britain and Europe do while residing on MOAI GOD Sovereign People of the World Lands. They will have to own up to the REAL MOAI GODS TRUTH and REFUTE this ENTIRE LIEN BILL DEBT CHARGE INDICTMENT AFFIDAVIT WARRANT. Which is already ENFORCED against every person living in AOTEA New Zealand who has BENEFITED Greater than the original NATIVES Surnames the holders of these MOAI DOCTRINES OF GODS WORLD DISCOVERY TITLE Legal Instruments for LIEN CLAIMANTS against the very people who are DESIGNED this new freedom
Beyond The Incorporation of New Zealand A New & Honorable Partnership

Please seriously look at what the OATH of the SATAN BLACK POPE of ROME ADOLFO NICOLAS PACHON. Who DESIGNED this New Word Order New Freedom Plan with the new Fraud WHITE POPE FRANCIS NOW a wanted Criminal by the International World Court of Justice ICJ and ICCST International Crimes of Church and State Tribunal at THE HAGUE- in BRUSSELS. Note also that MOAI HAPU SOVEREIGNS comes under the 1835 Declaration of Independence Sovereign State Government of our 1835 FLAG Sovereign Jurisdiction. Refer to 8.0 THE FACTS ABOUT MAORI SELF GOVERNMENT MAORI and MOAI HAPU are not INFANTS of CITIZENS of the Crown Corporation Government but their own Self Government under their KING WILLIAM IV from Westminster Parliament British Government. An unknown yet very important fact is Te Ture Whenua Maori, Maori Land Act 1993 is a Sovereign Law was brought into existence by the Parliament of Westminster not the Parliament of New Zealand. Ture Whenua Maori, Maori Land Act 1993 is about Maori Customary Law and self-government. The Act has the power to override the decisions of The Crown. The Act also enables Maori to whangai (adoption) Adopt non-Maori thus helping to free them from the system. This applies from 1993 doesnt apply to Moai Law. You see here in the section and explanation 9.0 The Declaration, The Treaty and The Government The Unholy Alliance Roman Catholic Church Pope and the Queen of England are the Leaders of this Corrupt System of Government as you can see here. MOAI has a PATTERN of OFFENDING we Pin LIEN INDICTMENT WARRANTS to the Corporate SOLE and real live natural person who is controlling their evil SOLE PERSON!
AFFIDAVIT: Queens Birthday 3 June 2013 New Zealand. I Hoani Kahaki Wanoa, Moai Crown Confederation Customary Legal Advocate Assignee Principle Authority Creditor of Auckland New Zealand, swear to God Almighty that the Queen Monarchy Royal Sovereign Family is a Fraud Corrupted Bloodline Heir to the Throne. Now call on the Westminster Parliament to investigate the new Claims of Earl of Windsor North PlantagenantMichael Hastings is the legitimate Heir to the Throne as the King of England! And Moai Statue in Queen Elizabeth II Great Court in London is Moai Gods Grace Face of Authority and Jurisdiction as the Superior Rock Memorial Face of God Atua Creator of Heaven and Earth as the Truth with Affidavits and Doctrines of Discovery attached to Moai Crown Affidavits herein. God save King Michael 1 of England. The Jesuit Pope Priest God is a Fake nothing God!
11
12
In 1295 King Edward 1, the Church leaders and the leading Nobles met to form the Model Parliament that set the pattern for parliament today. They agreed to add the Commons to represent rural landowners and towns people. The Commons would be elected by the people to represent them in parliament. This process is not as altruistic as it appears will be further explained below Part 5.0: The Oaths Confirms Government and Parliament. 3.3. The Protestant Reformation and Sovereignty In 1517 Martin Luther a German priest initiated a Protestant Reformation because, it said, he was disturbed by the Churchs practice regarding the sale of indulgences payment to reduce penance or sin. In 1521 Pope Clement V11 granted King Henry V111 the title Defender of the Faith, for his support of the Papacy during the Protestant Reformation. The Faith is described in King Henry's book 'Defense of the Seven Sacraments'. Thomas More in fact wrote it. Over time relationships with the Papacy deteriorated and King Henry initiated a break away from the Roman Catholic Church, choosing instead to align fully with the new Protestant Church of England. Pope Paul 111 revoked the grant of title Defender of the Faith. Parliament passed a law authorizing its continued use. Even though the Protestant Church of England gained favor it was and is still essentially a Catholic Church. And the Pope is still the de facto and de jure Sovereign of England. In 1558 King Henry's daughter Queen Elizabeth 1 inherited the throne. She strengthened her alliance with The Church and claimed the title Supreme Governor. Now why would she do that if she were still the Sovereign of England? She also continued the title Defender of the Faith. The Archbishop of Canterbury remained the Spiritual Leader and Head of the Church of England. In 1689 the Bill of Rights was introduced requiring future Kings and Queens to be Protestants. Does this mean the Pope and the Roman Catholic Church were no longer in charge. No it just means The Faith of the Roman Catholic Church continued under another name the Church of England. The end of the following section describes recent events that support this conclusion. 3.4. The Act of Settlement and German Royalty In 1701 the Act of Settlement assured that King William 111's nearest Protestant relations, the German family of Sophia, Electress of Hanover, became next in line to the throne after his sister in-law Anne. One has to ask why this settlement with German Royalty was/is important. The following offers an explanation. The aim of the papacy was and is to expand Christian Communion throughout the world, indeed through out the Universe as the Universal Church. Pope Innocent 111 was relentless in growing the kingdom of the papacy. One country the powerful German Empire retained its own supremacy. However because they embraced the patrimony of St Peter, Pope Innocent recognized Germany as being part of the papacy. Indeed this was cemented when the Act of Settlement was passed in 1701. This Act ensured Germanic and Papal control of England. Part 5.0 describes how this is done through the Coronation Oath, the Oaths of Office and the Parliamentary Oaths.
13
Parliamentary Oaths The heritage of Anglo-Saxon, Norman and German ancestry is what makes up the Royal family today. Indeed the Saxons originated from Germany in the first place. The Normans are of the Norse Vikings from Scandinavia, who set up home in France in a place they named Normandy. As already stated there were attempts at minimizing the Roman Catholic Church influence. In 1205 King John seized the churchs revenue. He eventually lost his (E) State and England came under the rule of a new Sovereign Pope Innocent 111. John remained King of England, but he was no longer the Head of (E) State. In 1536 under the rule of King Henry V111 an act called the Act Extinguishing the Authority of the Bishop in Rome became law and payments to the Roman Catholic Church were halted. The Archbishop of Canterbury became the head of the Protestant Church of England. In 1553 Queen Mary succeeded the throne and restored the Catholic Church and the Pope once again became the Sovereign of England. In 1558 Queen Elizabeth 1 succeeded the throne. She was also sympathetic to the Roman Catholic Church but this fact has been downplayed in history. Elizabeth did not take the title Head of State because England belonged to the Pope. Rather she secured the title Supreme Governor. The significance of this will become clear. 3.5. Collection of Taxes Besides The Church and English Royalty there is a third influence re our parliament and government systems. In 1066 King William 1 of Normandy took the throne of England by conquest. The Roman Catholic Church backed him. A select group of nobles referred to as tenants in chief, gathered revenue (taxes). This was divided between the King, The Church and The Tenants in Chief. This system of paying taxes on the Sovereigns (E) State has been refined over the years as The Tenants in Chief evolved. To understand this we look further into the German connection. In 1743 Mayer Amschel Bauer was born in Frankfurt, Germany. His father was a moneylender and owner of a counting house. Following his father's death, Bauer took over his father's business. Bauer changed his name to Rothschild, after the red hexagram or sign signifying 666 hanging over the entrance door of his fathers counting house. ("Rot," is German for, "Red," "Schild," is German for, "Sign"). Mayer Amschel Rothschild courted and eventually gained favor with royalty and the papacy by helping them successfully increase their wealth and expansion of their kingdom. Eventually Mayer Rothschilds power became so great that in 1790 he said, "Let me issue and control a nation's money and I care not who writes the laws." On his death his eldest son Nathan Mayer Rothschild became head of the family dynasty. In 1815 Nathan echoed his father when he said, "I care not what puppet is placed upon the throne of England to rule the Empire on which the sun never sets. The man who controls Britain's money supply controls the British Empire, and I control the British money supply." He said he had been in England 17 years and increased the 20,000 stake given to him by his father to 50 million. The Rothschilds had effectively become the 'tenants in chief'. They now control the Bank of England and all the main banks throughout the world. They established the system of paper debits and credits, replacing the shipping of gold from country to country. In 1821 Kalmann (Carl) Mayer Rothschild developed a strong connection with the Vatican. The Rothschilds eventually took over the financial operations of the Catholic Church, worldwide. Pope Gregory XVI conferred upon Kalmann the Order of St. George. It is said that when the Pope received Kalmann, he would give him his hand rather than the customary toe to kiss. The Popes recognition of the Rothschild banking dynasty was
14
complete when he gave them control of growing the papal estate. Today the Vatican is an independent and hugely wealthy state. The wealth of the world is still owned by this union of Church, British/German Royalty, and Bankers. This union of the Sovereign, Church and Nobles (aka The Tenants In Chief The Bankers) has been called by some an Unholy Alliance. Through a system of Corporations Sole the bankers control the worlds money supply. The goal of the Papacy is to convert the whole world to Christianity through the Roman Catholic Church and all its derivatives. From the time of the Holy Wars through to the wars today, this has been the agenda of the Unholy Alliance. Today the head of the Roman Catholic Church is Pope Benedict XV1. He was born Joseph Aloisius Ratzinger a German. In 1941 at the age of 14 Ratzinger was conscripted into the Hitler Youth organization. He claims he was an unenthusiastic member, who refused to attend meetings, which seems a bit strange that he could get away with this attitude under such a strict regime. Martin Luther led the Protestant Reformation. At first he was sympathetic towards Jews in Germany and tried to convert them to Christianity. When his attempts failed he grew bitter towards them and incited hatred and eradication of Jews. The Rothschilds are Ashkenazi Jews. The Jews that were being eradicated were not of that lineage. It is said that the Rothschilds initiate and fund both sides of wars. With the rise of German Supremacists (Nazis) the eradication of Jews became part of their philosophy. Remember the Normans who were of the Norse Vikings. Germanic supremacists saw the Viking as a symbol of the Germanic master race. From 16 19 September 2010 Pope Benedict XV1 visited Britain. On the 16th he met with Her Majesty the Queen at Holyrood Palace in Scotland. On the 17th he spoke with senior clerics of the Church of England. On the 19th he became Archbishop of Canterbury for the day. Why would the Church of England allow the head of the Roman Catholic Church to take over for a day? Because the Pope is already the Head of (E) State and Scotland favors the Roman Catholic Church. Under the system of the Corporations Sole the Roman Catholic Church owns most of the worlds (E) State. The Corporation Sole is not a Living Being. It is a single ('sole') incorporated office, occupied by a single ('sole') man or woman. It has no need for by-laws and no Board of Directors.
4.0 THE CORPORATION SOLE

Parliament and Government operate under the protection of a Corporation Sole - a legal entity. A Corporation Sole enables the orderly transfer of church or religious society property. It keeps title within the church or religious society. To ensure that it cannot be treated as the estate of the vicar of the church, the property is titled to the office of the Corporation Sole. This allows a corporation (usually a religious corporation) to pass vertically in time from one office holder to the next successor-in-office, giving the position legal continuity with each subsequent office holder having identical powers to his predecessor.
15
THE MONARCH OF GOVERNMENT

A Corporation Sole is authorized by Letters Patent. This is a type of legal instrument in the form of an open letter issued by a monarch or government, granting an office, right, monopoly, title, or status to a person or to some entity such as a corporation. The monarch or government is a form of open or public proclamation. Searches on the Internet reveal the following Corporations Sole for New Zealand: The Monarch in Right of New Zealand The Sovereign in Right of New Zealand Her Majesty the Queen in Right Of New Zealand The Crown in Right of New Zealand The Arms in Right of New Zealand Wherever there is government, there is a system of Corporations Sole. Following is a possible configuration of how these Corporations Sole of New Zealand govern our country. However way these corporations are configured it is certain they are in charge.
16
17
A Corporation Sole is a Legal Entity I single office, 1 single owner, no by laws, and no Board of Directors. Therefore the single owner is answerable to nothing and no -one else. Each Corporation Sole is a separate entity and the positions of responsibility are treated differently. When John Key is speaking as the Prime Minister he is not the Head of Government. When he is speaking as the Head of Government he is not the Prime Minister. Note when he speaks he will define which role he is in and speak from that role. The Ministers of The Crown refer often to the Office of The Crown. By going to the New York or London stock exchange you will see that the governments financial report is presented by the Office ofHer Majesty the Queen in Right of New Zealand.
5.0 THE OATHS THAT CONFIRM GOVERNMENT & PARLIAMENT

Read the following Oaths in light of what you have learned above. 5.1. The Coronation Oath The Archbishop of Canterbury administers this. Archbishop of Canterbury: Will you solemnly promise and swear to Govern the People of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, Canada, Australia, New Zealand, the Union of South Africa, Pakistan and Ceylon, and of your Possessions and the other Territories to any of them belonging or pertaining, according to their respective laws and customs? Queen: I solemnly promise so to do. Archbishop: Will you to your power cause Law and Justice, in Mercy, to be executed in all your judgements? Queen: I will. Archbishop: Will you to the utmost of your power maintain the Laws of God and the true profession of the Gospel? Will you to the utmost of your power maintain in the United Kingdom the Protestant Reformed Religion established by law? Will you maintain and preserve inviolably the settlement of the Church of England, and the doctrine, worship, discipline, and government thereof, as by law established in England? And will you preserve unto the Bishops and Clergy of England, and to the Churches there committed to their charge, all such rights and privileges, as by law do or shall appertain to them or any of them Queen: All this I promise to do. Then the Queen, arising out of her chair, supported by peers and with the Sword of State being carried before her. Goes to the altar to make her solemn Oath in the sight of all the people to observe the premises by laying her right hand upon the Holy Gospel in the great Bible. (Which was before carried in the procession and is now brought from the altar by the archbishop, and tendered to her as she kneels upon the steps), saying: Queen: The things, which I have here before promised, I will perform and keep. So help me God. Then the Queen kisses the Bible and signs the Oath. A year after this article was written videos on the queens coronation came to light. These are listed in the links at the end of this article.
18
5.2. Governor- General New Zealand Oath The Chief Justice of New Zealand administers the oath of office at installation of new Governors- General of New Zealand. The oath is as follows: I, (name), swear that, as Governor- General and Commander-in-Chief of the Realm of New Zealand, comprising New Zealand; the self-governing states of the Cook Islands and Niue; Tokelau; and the Ross Dependency. I will faithfully and impartially serve Her (or His) Majesty (specify the name of the reigning Sovereign), Queen (or King) of New Zealand. Her (or His) heirs and successors and the people of the Realm of New Zealand, in accordance with their respective laws and customs so help me God. In an election year Civilians (Commoners) are told this is their opportunity to elect a new Civilian Government. The term Civilian implies there is a Military. Indeed Government does control a Military under The Office of the Arms in Right of New Zealand. To get everyone into the mood the party planners begin promoting the true profession of the Gospel. Each party presents the Gospel through their favorite tune. Today they emphasize either a 'socially responsible' message, or a 'free trade business' message. As the electioneering progresses the people begin to march to the beat, favoring either the LEFT socialist or the RIGHT trader message. Traditionally the LEFT was pro Roman Catholic inclusion and the RIGHT was pro Protestant only. The winning party is announced usually during the evening of the day of election. Everyone who voted for the winning party is invited to the celebration. It's party time, the Civilian's reward for voting them in. The runner up party is not completely left out in the cold. They become the opposition a government in waiting. Indeed anyone who wins an electorate regardless of which party they support, all become members of the House of Representatives. Parliament is the meeting of House of Representatives To Debate and legislate on matters pertaining to the Sovereigns E-State The Crown (Church Symbol) legally protects that, and the executive administered by Representatives of the Tenants in Chief After an election the Prime Minister elect forms a cabinet ministry. A church ceremony is held where the Supreme Governor or in the outer Realms like New Zealand the Governor- General, appoints the leader of the elected party as Prime Minister. Dame Sylvia Cartwright describes the role of the Governor- General in an election year: In an election year, the Governor- General's constitutional role is very prominent. That role is broader than the Governor- General's role in the government formation process. There are a number of public expressions of the Governor- General's legal powers in an election year, which take the form of various election-related ceremonies. The ceremony marking the dissolution of Parliament, which brings the life of Parliament to an end with a flourish of trumpets, is the first example. The swearing-in ceremony at Government House next, in the splendid ballroom at Government House, before a large crowd of onlookers, friends and relatives of those being sworn in, as well as a large and interested group of media. At this ceremony, the Governor- General has the very important task of appointing the Prime Minister, members of the Executive Council and Ministers of the Crown. After the 2005 election, this ceremony was particularly significant, because for the first time in our history, members of four different political parties were seated at the table, and appointed as Ministers and Executive Councilors.
19
The Governor- General's legal powers are also evident at the ceremony marking the Opening of Parliament, The Commission Opening of Parliament is the first meeting of Parliament following a general election, where Parliament is declared open before the assembled members that have been elected. The Governor General does not usually attend this ceremony, but instead authorizes Royal Commissioners (usually the Chief Justice and two other Judges) to attend on his or her behalf, and read the proclamation-summoning Parliament to meet. Soon after the Commission Opening, the Governor- General must confirm the appointment of the Speaker-Elect, also in a ceremony at Government House. The final public expression of the Governor- General's constitutional role in the election process is at the State Opening of Parliament, a magnificent ceremony rich in symbolism and involving all three branches of government. Include Judges, Armed Forces, Kaumatua, kapa haka groups, diplomats and special officers such as the New Zealand Herald of Arms and Black Rod. The State Opening of Parliament is not the opening of Parliament, but is the day on which the Governor- General explains, in what is known as the Speech from the Throne, the reasons for the opening of Parliament or the matters which the government wishes to consider over the next Parliamentary term. At the State Opening of Parliament, the Prime Minister presents the Speech from the Throne to the Governor- General, who then delivers it. As these ceremonies demonstrate, the Governor- General exercises a number of different legal powers during an election year. All these formal actions are undertaken according to the democratic will of the people. As I have said previously, my role is to ensure that government authority is passed to those to whom the people wish it to be transferred. http://www.gg.govt.nz/node/538 By way of these oaths the governance of the elected Civil Government is transferred to an Executive Council that works for a Military Government. In this capacity the Governor- General is known as Commander-in-Chief. The Civil Government is the branch that creates the legislature or policy for the Sovereign's Estate, according to the people's respective laws and customs. The oaths also deliver the following part of the preamble to the English version 1840 Treaty of Waitangi. To constitute and appoint a functionary properly authorised to treat with the Aborigines of New Zealand for the recognition of Her Majesty's Sovereign authority over the whole or any part of those islands 5.3. Member of Parliament Oath of Allegiance The following oath of allegiance sworn on behalf of all Civilians by all their elected representatives, define the laws and customs we all agree to accept whether we vote or not. I, [name], swear that I will be faithful and bear true allegiance to Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth the Second, Her heirs and successors, according to law. So help me God. The Coronation Oath explains the laws that the people's representatives have sworn to bear allegiance to. The oaths then transfer to the other two branches the authority to govern the judicial and defense affairs of the Estate. Note defense = military. All three branches are the three Offices of Government. Understanding the nature of an Office is important to understanding how the Unholy Alliance governs and why it is called such.
20
Whoever Owns the Estate, Owns the Wealth, Dictates the Terms Today the Tenants in Chief are the Banking Elite They created the mortgage system to enable the Unholy Alliance to Ultimately Own ALL Property (E)States) See appendix 2 for a summary on how mortgages work. The Banking Elite are represented in Government by the Executive Council 5.4. The Executive Councils Oath of Office I, [name], being chosen and admitted of the Executive Council of New Zealand, swear that I will to the best of my judgement, at all times, when thereto required. Freely give my counsel and advice to the Governor- General for the time being, for the good management of the affairs of New Zealand. That I will not directly or indirectly reveal such matters as shall be debated in Council and committed to my secrecy, but that I will in all things be a true and faithful Councilor. So help me God. The Executive Council is the highest formal instrument of government. Council members must also be cabinet ministers, but not all cabinet ministers are council members. BEFORE they swear an oath as a cabinet member Executive council members swear an Oath of Office. It is also an Oath of Secrecy. NOTE: The executive council DOES NOT swear an Oath of Allegiance MOAI SAYS ILLEGAL!
6.0 THE SOVEREIGNS HOUSE OF DISHONOURING DEBATE

Parliament's Prime Minister and Cabinet Ministers are not the same role as Government's Head of Government and Ministers of the Crown, although some people may hold positions in both. For example John Key is both the Prime Minister in Parliament and the Head of Government. These are two different titles, two different roles. Bills passed by parliament are presented to the Sovereign for Royal Assent into ACTS. These form the legislature that the Government then ACTS upon. The Executive Council through their own process of 'Orders in Council' can prioritize and interpret in their own way - and they do. We only have to look at the Constitution Act 1986 that states: #22 - Parliamentary control of public finance It shall not be lawful for the Crown, except by or under an Act of Parliament, a) To levy a tax; or b) To borrow money or to receive money borrowed from any person; or. MOAI SAYS ILLEGAL! c) To spend any public money The system ensures that parliament will agree to levy a tax because they have no other way to pay for public services. Taxes are being requested all the time. Public money is now in a Corporation Sole where the Executive Council represents the Single Owner who dictates the terms.
21
Whoever Owns the Estate, Owns the Wealth, Dictates the Terms The Executive Council executes the Legal and Financial Protection for the (E)State. Their allegiance is to the Corporations Sole: 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. The Monarch in Right of New Zealand MOAI SAYS ILLEGAL! The Sovereign in Right of New Zealand MOAI SAYS ILLEGAL! Her Majesty the Queen in Right of New Zealand MOAI SAYS ILLEGAL! The Crown in Right of New Zealand MOAI SAYS ILLEGAL! The Arms in Right of New Zealand MOAI SAYS ILLEGAL!
MOAI CROWN
All who are elected to Parliament represent the peoples wishes to the Unholy Alliance 1. The Church, (Private Foreign Alien Corporate Sole Owners Company s) MOAI SAY ILLEGAL! 2. The Royal English/German Family, (Private Foreign Alien Corporate Sole Owner Company s) 3. The Bankers Tenants in Chief. (Private Foreign Alien Corporate Sole Owners Company s) This system of governance will always be the outcome no matter what party wins. 6.1. Parliament The Sovereign or his/her representative the Governor General provides Royal Assent to pass Bills into Acts. They are not part of the House of Representatives. They do have eyes and ears in Parliament as the roles below indicate. 6.2. The House Of Representatives Speaker of the House a) b) c) d) e) acts as landlord for Parliaments buildings represents the House to the Sovereign, Governor- General, other Parliaments and Organizations chairs the meetings of the House makes rulings on points of procedure chairs three select committees
Deputy and Assistant Speakers Chairs committees of the whole House Prime Minister a) Accounts for Government activity by replying to questions directed to the Prime Minister during question time b) Delivers the annual Prime Ministers statement c) Leads the Governments contribution to major debates. d) Advises Governor General on Ministers of the Crown appointments
22
Cabinet Ministers a) are appointed by the Prime Minister b) introduce and lead debate on bills related to their portfolios Leader of the House a) b) c) d) e) f) g) Manages Government business in the House Moves motions for the Government that relate to House and committee procedure Determines the order of Government business in the House Has primary responsibility for the Governments lawmaking program. Leader of the Opposition Leader of the government-in-waiting Leads opposition responses in major debates.
Whips Each political party in the House has a whip to organize and administrate their members. Whips: a) b) c) d) Prepare lists of members from their party to speak in debates Make sure that members of their party are in the House when needed Negotiate with other whips on House business Cast votes on behalf of their parties during a party vote.
Clerk of the House a) b) c) d) e) f) g) h) Is the principal permanent officer of the House of Representatives. Is appointed by the Governor- General as an expert in parliamentary law and procedure. advises the Speaker and members on the rules, practices, and customs of the House records the proceedings and decisions of the House certifies bills ready for Royal assent issues the Order Paper (order of business) for each sitting day administers the oath or affirmation of allegiance for members of Parliament after a general election Is chief executive of the Office of the Clerk of the House of Representatives, which provides a secretariat for the House and its committees.
i) Serjeant-at-Arms a) Is a permanent officer of the House. b) Is responsible to the Speaker for the maintaining proper standards of behavior in the galleries and areas around the debating chamber. Usher of the Black Rod
a)
Provides the Governor- General with a messenger to communicate with the House on ceremonial occasions.
23
Members of Parliament All who won a seat for their electorate in the elections, and are not a cabinet minister.
7.0 THE GOVERNANCE THAT ENSLAVES PEOPLE

The Sovereign regards Citizens as Subjects or Infants. The English version of the 1840 Treaty of Waitangi, confirms: Her Majesty's subjects who have already settled in New Zealand. b) A Subject relinquishes power to the ruler of the (E)State. MOAI CROWN SAY ILLEGAL c) An Infant needs a Parent to make decisions for him/her. MOAI CROWN SAY ILLEGAL! d) All Subjects are Infants until the age of 16. MOAI CROWN SAY ILLEGAL!
Immigrants to New Zealand are required to take the following Citizenship Oath: I, [name], swear that I will be faithful and bear true allegiance to Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth the Second, Her heirs and successors, according to law, and that I will faithfully observe the laws of New Zealand and fulfil my duties as a New Zealand citizen. So help me God. As a New Zealand citizen they too become Subjects. The Sovereign In Right Of New Zealand is the Corporation Sole that gives Royal assent to Bills thus transforming them into ACTS. All Subjects and Infants are expected to ACT accordingly. Citing a letter from the In-Land Revenue to a bankrupt verifies a process that enslaves people by regarding them as 'Subjects'. The letter is sent immediately a bankruptcy is confirmed by the courts- The introduction states-, Dear Mr _____________. Thank you for your recent application for an IRD number. Your number is shown on the IR card at the bottom of this letter. Note: The bankrupted individual did not apply. Following is a copy of the actual letter from In Land Revenue. Note this is a collection of in land revenue. Today more and more people are being bankrupted than ever before, through no fault of there own. Bank-rupt means the Bankers have ruptured or severed access to certain banking privileges. What does this confirm? It confirms that the owners at the top of the hierarchy on page 3 include the Bankers. Indeed they pull the plug to the ocean of abundance if things do not go their way. MOAI CROWN Sovereign Monarch Owns Estates, Wealth and Dictates MOAI GOD Terms Here's how it all begins. Certain ACTS enable the tracking of all Subjects or Infants. These tracking processes begin with the Registration of all Births. A Birth Certificate is issued with the name in CAPITAL LETTERS. In legal terms the CAPITAL LETTERS represent a TITLE not a Living Being. The CAPITAL LETTER TITLE represents, 'Title of the Property of The Crown in Right of New Zealand. Thus SUSAN BAKER is a TITLE
Moai Crown Monarch Sovereign State Confederation Sole Moai Crown Monarch Sovereign State Confederation Sole Company Company Moai Gods Grace Rock Face is Superior Crown Earth Ruler Authority and Administrator as Moai God Copyright Spirit Commercial Lien Title of Moai 24 Wanoa Royal Tahitian-African Male Monarch Sovereign State. Are Inheritors of Gods World Sovereign Peoples Confederation. Holds the Clear Debt Free Allodial
Title to all Moai God Crown Land free of Debt, Mortgage, Liens. Moai is the reigning Monarch Power shut down illegal Sole Businesses stealing money from Moai Sovereigns through Corrupt CT Land Titles and Fraud Bank Mortgage No End Date Contracts, Fractional Banking, all Fraud Resource Management Acts of States, Governments Parliaments. In any part in the World Sole Persons using the Fraud Queen Elizabeth II and Pope Crown Alien (E)State Pope Adolfo Nicolas Pachon as their Monarchy Sovereignty Head of State over the Queen who is abdicating with all her aliens who emigrated to Indigenous Native Lands are now Moai Lien Debtors with the Pope, Queen of England, Rothschilds. Moai Crown has Absolute Monarchy Government over Moai God Earth World Authority Ruler Memorial Title Lien in Queen Elizabeth II Great Court London extinguished the Queen of Englands Fraud Royal Family Monarch Title Succession to Prince Charles and her assigns Authority from God Almighty she cant prove ever existed. She swore her Oath to the Jesuit Generals of Pope Pachon and Pope Francis Satan Devil Hell God
25
Moai Crown Monarch Sovereign State Confederation Sole Company
But Susan Baker is a Living Being. Remember the Sovereign regards citizens as Subjects or Infants - in other
26
words property. When Susan Baker signs for SUSAN BAKER she is agreeing to take responsibility for The Property of the Crown. Pause and absorb that for a moment. The Birth Certificate is number that catalogues the Certificate of Ownership. The Certificate is presented to the World Bank or International Monetary Fund as collateral for a loan. The 'Property' has an expected life span of 65 to 85 years as a Consumer. Each Property is thought by some to be worth millions during a lifetime and increases when The Property produces Infants.
MOAI GOD EARTH SOVEREIGN MONARCH CROWN WORLD STATES CONFEDERATION And HOANI HAKAKI WANOA Royal Tahitian African Sovereign Monarch Versus (Queen) ELIZABETH WINDSOR (E)-STATE and Black Pope ADOLFO NICOLAS PACHON And
MOAI GODS GRACE SUPERIOR SOVEREIGNS MONARCHY CROWN RULING AUTHORITY Bill Charged Lien Indicted (E)STATE Corporate Sole Fraudsters 1 Trillion Trillion DEBT Backdated to MOAI HAPU & KING WILLIAM IV 1835 Declaration of Independence Sovereign Flag Jurisdiction & Constitution fixed in Westminster Parliament Statute Law Extant forever. AFFIDAVIT: I Hoani Kahaki Wanoa Sovereign Monarch of Moai Earth Gods Country of Aotea Swear to Moai face of God Almighty my Sovereign Truth Oaths these my Statements of Lien Claimant on behalf of Moai Sovereign Parent Landowners throughout Gods World we live in take back our Birth Right Titles that (E)STATE must Lawfully REFUTE this LIEN CLAIMANTS AFFIDAVITS in their entirety at the onset of MOAI Sovereigns COMPLAINTS ACCUSATIONS against NAMED CRIMINAL OFFENDERS charged in the ICJ International Courts of Justice and ICCST International Crimes of Church and State Tribunal at THE HAGUE in Brussels (E)STATE is predominantly GERMAN ANCESTRY Aliens Illegally occupying Moai land using it and Moai Gods Sovereign Parents infants as collateral without disclosing the intentions of Gods Truth Purpose Benefits of the Sovereigns but for themselves and their Corporate Sole did deceive MOAI GOD and his Sovereign Children as we the TRUE GOD Sovereign now challenge (E)STATE QUEEN ELIZABETH II SOLE Identified here (E) FIRST OFFENDER Elizabeth Windsor (LIEN Defendant) and STATE Identified here as First Mortgagee SOLE QUEEN ELIZABETH II SUPREME GOVERNOR OF THE CHURCH OF ENGLAND A Privately Owned Elizabeth Queen of England Corporation SECOND OFFENDER (LIEN Defendant). And THIRD OFFENDER Corporate SOLE as (LIEN Defendant) is BUCKINGAM PALACE and with Elizabeth FOURTH OFFENDER HER MAGESTY THE QUEEN IN RIGHT OF NEW ZEALAND As a (LIEN Defendant). The FIFTH OFFENDER as (LIEN Defendant) is the Roman Catholic SATAN DEVIL (Black Pope) University Professor Spaniard Man ADOLFO NICOLAS PACHON most powerful man in the world. He ordered Presidents Assassinated. HAARP Machines his Jesuit Generals used orders Earth Quakes killing Gods Earth, his spirit man bees, fish, birds Animals, plants, crops, water. Air polluted skies chem-trails why MOAI GOD CROWN Proves beyond a doubt that the wealth of these UNHOLY ALLIANCE HOUSE OF DISHONOR SATAN (E) STATE PRIVATE CORPORATE FACELESS SATIN DEVIL SPIRIT ASS SOLE S are BAD PARENTS. That MOAI CROWN Challenge the Authenticity of (E) STATE GOD. IS NOT CREDIBLE HONEST
27
OPEN to ACCOUNT for their FRAUD CORRUPT Religious DEVIL GODS Practice that are not of our MOAI GOD in HEAVEN GODS TRUTH Lore Law JURISDICTION Every person who emigrated to AOTEA New Zealand did so under the QUEEN OF ENGLAND Sovereignty separate to MOAI HAPU Sovereignty at time MEMORIAL Aliens 1840 TREATY OF WAITANGI Agreement The East India Company was started first by the British Crown Political Trade Movement of Racketeering till now in 2013. As far as New Zealand Colonial Government is concerned they recognize their 1840 Treaty as their Crown Government Founding Documents of Title to New Zealand standing on TE TII MARAE in Bay of Islands originating from the British UK Government 1701 Settlement Act. But they have No Legal Constitution or Jurisdiction or a True Declaration of Independence Sovereignty of there own as Aliens of England and Rome. MOAI CROWN State Hapu Sovereign Confederation is Legal Owners of this Country the Crown NZ Government calls New Zealand. King William IV acknowledged MOAI HAPU as Sovereign Landowners gave them his British Government 1835 Declaration of Independence Trading Flag Jurisdiction and Constitution as a Nation-State British UK Business World Sovereign Trading Partner Country. Now this means New Zealand Government wants to forget its past! So now they severed LEGAL ties to MOAI HAPU SOVEREIGN at 1840 and again now in 2013 they are contemplating forming a new Referendum to create a CROWN NZ GOVERNMENT BEYOND THE INCORPORATION OF NEW ZEALAND HONORABLE PARTNERSHIP as the new (E) STATE MOAI LIEN DEBTORS. So their continued Ignorance of MOAI HAPU SOVEREIGN forgot that by ignoring their UNACCOUNTED FRAUD PAST then SHINING A LIGHT ON FREEDOM chosen words Means they must face MOAI CROWN STATE CONFEDERATIONS BRITISH GOVERNMENT FRAUD AUDITOR Therefore MOAI TAHITIAN HAPU made Agreement with King William IV from 28 October 1835 Memorial The Registration of Birth transfers authority to 'The Crown in Right of New Zealand'. Remember the Crown is the judiciary. It then issues a Birth Certificate, which confirms the birth of the Property, not a 'Human Being'. The Property is also an Infant. The Birth Certificate` gives 'The Crown in Right of New Zealand' complete authority as a parent. A Living Human Being cannot be forced to pay tax unless he/she volunteers. A Birth Certificate gives title of the 'Property' to the Crown, which then confirm with the In-Land Revenue that the Subject using the property would like an IRD number. Other tracking processes include marriage or union certificates, school registration, vehicle license, drivers license, passport, mortgage, Rates, electoral roll, and death certificate. Their purpose is to ensure that the whereabouts of the Subject using the property is known at all times.
8.0 THE FACTS ABOUT MAORI SELF GOVERNMENT

It will come as surprise to most to learn that Maori are not Subjects. The 1835 Declaration of Independence of New Zealand makes this clear. They (the hereditary and appointed chiefs) also agree to send a copy of this Declaration to the King of England, to thank him for his acknowledgement of their flag, and in return for the friendship and protection they have shown, are prepared to show, to such of his subjects as have settled in their country... The preamble to the 1840 Treaty of Waitangi also clarifies.
28
In consequence of the great number of Her Majesty's subjects who have already settled here in New Zealand... Her Majesty therefore being desirous to establish a settled form of Civilian Government with a view to avert the evil consequences. Which result from the necessary Laws And institutions alike to the native population and to Her subjects... Yet since the signing of these documents, governments have illegally been treating Maori as Subjects. The 1846 Constitution Act shows that Maori today are correct when they say that Maori Self- Government was enshrined in The Treaty. In 2003 Hohepa Mapiria Joseph (Joe) Murphy, Royal Regent of Privy Council Explained that Sections 9 and 10 of the 1846 Constitution Act, ...Provided that Maori Customary laws were to be made by Maori Self Government, Governments in their own native districts, and if they wanted their laws recognized internationally, They could do this through the Queen. Who issued letters patent more or less acknowledging? Receipt of those laws, and she placed them into the laws of England right around the Commonwealth of the United Kingdom and enforces them back into Aotearoa, New Zealand. In the 1852 Constitution Act section 71 said the same thing that Maori Customary laws were to be Made by Maori Self- Government. On 7 July 2003 Mapiria further clarified in an interview that in 1986 the 1852 Constitution Act was repealed. ...The 1852 Constitution Act was repealed thus breaching the 1947 Statutes of Westminster Adoption Act Under the 1852 Constitution Act and by the 1947 Statute they (the settlers) had Obtained from the British Crown a warrant to Govern- themselves and they gave themselves Full Power to chop off their own heads by repealing the 1852 Constitution Act.
New Zealand is now in limbo. The current government have no legal or lawful constitution. 9.0 The Declaration, The Treaty and The Government
In 1835 King William 1V a northern group of both hereditary and appointed leaders known as Rangatira signed the 1835 Declaration of Independence of New Zealand. The King declared full responsibility for his Subjects. The Rangatira declared responsibility to their Hapu or extended families. These declarations confirmed the continuance of Hapu or Customary- law making. An 1835 Declaration of an Independent Hapu Sovereign Nation State Flag given by Kng William IV was Raised to acknowledge the jurisdiction of the United Hapu of New Zealand. The Rangatira agreed,
29
To meet in Congress each Autumn- for the purpose of framing laws and they cordially invite Southern tribes to lay aside their private animosities and to consult the safety and welfare of our common country, by joining the Waka Alliance of New Zealand. They also agreed to the following, Because of friendship and protection shown toward us, we will take care of the pakeha who have settled these shores, who have traveled here for the purposes of trade. Between 1830 and 1840 many Hapu were thriving under their own self-government. Hapu viewed land as the realm of Papatuanuku (Mother Earth) who provided them with protection and sustenance, as long as they honored and respected her spirit guardians and took care of their children. It is said that unrest increased amongst some of the Queens Subjects who wanted ownership of the land. In every country where the Unholy Alliance has gone the same pattern emerges. The aim is always to own the land and its wealth. First the explorers are sent to determine the wealth and assess the native population. Then the traders are sent to introduce new tools that make life easier and tools or services that begin to entice the young away from their traditions eg new gadgets, alcohol, smoking, gambling, sexual deviance. They also bring with them foreign disease that decimates the native population. Then the missionaries and a few settlers arrive. The role of the missionaries is to teach the truth of the gospel and spread mistrust amongst the natives, in their own spiritual path whatever that may be. Always amongst the new arrivals whether they are traders or settlers, will be those who greed for more. The Unholy Alliance needs this element to break the peace agreement. Then as stated in the preamble to The Treaty they can form a government to,"...Avert the evil consequences which must result from the absence of the necessary Laws and Institutions alike to the native population and Her subjects." Wars did eventuate over land ownership. In 1840 Queen Victoria was advised by her Governor- General to offer a Peace Treaty. In the preamble to the Treaty of Waitangi it says, The Queen desires to establish a SETTLED FORM of CIVIL GOVERNMENT to terminate the animosities between Maori people and the Pakeha who are without laws. Once government is established then schooling is introduced. The concept of school began with the Prussians who recognized that if one could control the mind of a child from an early age, they had a loyal follower for life. With schooling the young native population over time grew further and further away from nature and their traditions. Today schooling is compulsory and the government decides the curriculum. Before 1840 Maori meant natural or fresh water. The Treaty embedded this term as an identity reference for all the ab-original people of New Zealand. To treat with the aborigines of New Zealand hei kai whakarite ki nga tangata maori o Nu Tirani With the signing of the Treaty a partnership was declared meaning an agreement for parallel government.
Maori were to continue their own Self- Government as verified in the 1846 and 1852 Constitution Act. The Civil Government was about creating laws for 'Her Subjects'. Just as the
Queen in her Coronation Oath had to promise
30
To maintain and preserve inviolably the settlement of the Church of England. The same process of settlement is what Maori are requesting regarding the 1840 Treaty of Waitangi because in Article 2: Her Majesty the Queen of England confirms and guarantees to the Chiefs and Tribes of New Zealand and to the respective families and individuals thereof the full exclusive and undisturbed possession of their Lands and Estates Forests Fisheries and other properties. Note that the Chiefs and Tribes and respective 'families and individuals' are NOT referred to as Subjects. Ever since the signing of The Treaty, The Crown has stolen the land through wars they manipulated. Identifying, pursuing and buying out small land owners until they had a majority share, non payment of rates on land that was not ratable, and the Public Works Act that took land for some pretext then later used it for other purposes. Maori also gifted land for schools and churches. Once these purposes no longer existed The Crown kept the land. Hapu customary law recognized the return of gifts to the owner. As The Crown nears settlement of The Treaty of Waitangi with all tribes, the agenda of the Unholy Alliance will advance with rapid speed. Indeed it has already begun. In its first term of office The Crown began fast tracking to own all property (human, land and sea) so that it can monopolize the work force. Mine/rape our national reserves and our shores, to increase the wealth of the Sovereign, the Church and the Banking Elite the Unholy Alliance. New Zealanders have suffered because of the work of the Crown's theft and deliberate manipulation of negativity towards Maori. Government Laws require a flag to authenticate jurisdiction. This dates back to admiralty law. A ship could not enter another country without a recognized flag. Currently there is a debate about the true Flag of New Zealand. In 2009 Maori were asked to choose a preferred flag. A new Tino Rangatira flag was added to the choices. Others included the 1835 New Zealand Flag and the current 1902 flag. Why were Maori the only ones being asked to choose? What was the real reason behind this? Why has the discussion stopped? A close examination of the new Bills and Acts implemented during the present government's first term and the beginning of this there second term reveal the true agenda as, The Ultimate Ownership of all Property by way of Asset Sales to Multi-National Corporations Whoever Owns the Estate, Owns the Wealth, Dictates the Terms By choosing a new flag Maori are stating that the 1835 flag no longer holds jurisdiction. By settling with The Crown, Maori agree to the terms of settlement. Every settlement ensures The Crown continues to hold the power of judiciary. Upon settlement Maori become Subjects. An unknown yet very important fact is Te
Ture Whenua Maori, Maori Land Act 1993 is a Sovereign Law brought into existence by the Parliament of Westminster not Parliament of New Zealand. Three Regents were appointed by the Privy Council to draft the laws for the Act. Hohepa Mapiria points out that Ture Whenua Maori, Maori Land Act 1993 is about Maori Customary Law and Self- Government.
31
Customary Law is about guardianship and protection of Mother Nature and all her children. Mapiria further points out that the Act has the power to override the decisions of The Crown. The Act also enables Maori to whangai (adopt-) non-Maori thus helps to free them from the system.
The settler government was not and is not about Customary Law. It is a system of Corporations Sole; therefore it is about Corporate Law. It is about ownership of assets and mining the wealth to create more
wealth without regard for Mother Nature and whether or not she can replenish the core supply. There is not an endless supply of oil. However the sun shines every day no matter what and is freely available. They cant directly tax the sun yet. The incorporation of the world began in 1600 with the formation of the East India Company the first multi national company. Its purpose was to colonize the world beginning with the East Indies. It later became the English East India Company and then the British East India Company. In 1602 the second multi-national company the Dutch East India Company was formed. It was granted a 21-year monopoly to carry out colonial activities in Asia. In 1620 Dutch Captain Willem Kansz on his first southeastward journey observed an island off the coast of New Guinea, which he named Nieu Zelandt. It later became known as Zeelandia Nova New Sea Land. On 28 October 1835 when an assembly of chiefs met,
To declare the independence of our country, which is hereby constituted and declared to be an independent state, Ka wakaputa i te rangatiratanga o to matou wenua a ka meatia ka wakaputaia e matou he whenua rangatira, Under the designation of The United Tribes of New Zealand Kia huaina, ko Te Wakaminenga o nga Hapu o NuTireni.
The declaration was between the newly formed incorporation, The United Tribes of New Zealand and The King of
England Te Wakaminenga o nga Hapu o Nu Tireni me Te Kingi o Ingarangi
Note 1: The English words used to translate the Maori are the cause of many debates. What is evident in the translation is the desire to incorporate the people and the land. Note 2: The territory of New Zealand was defined in the declaration as Hauraki, which covers the North Cape to the latitude of the river Thames. No other territory was defined. Note 2: The territory of New Zealand was defined in the declaration as Hauraki, which covers the North Cape to the latitude of the river THAMES. No other territory was defined. Note 3: The English translation above says of our country. This should read of our land o to matou whenua. Each hapu has always and only referred to theyre lands being the region in which they hold stewardship eg as in Hauraki above. They do not see themselves as having jurisdiction over the whole country.
32
1) The declaration was formalized according to Corporate Law, by the raising of the first New Zealand Flag. A flag represents jurisdiction the ability to make laws. The flag raising signaled the introduction of law making and incorporations into this country. The flag ensured a system of parliament and government corporations could be implemented when the time was right. 2) The New Zealand Company originated in London in 1837 as the New Zealand Association with the aim of promoting the "systematic" colonization of New Zealand. On 4 February 1840 the time was now right to bring in government. The Treaty of Waitangi is a contract signed between two Corporations. Nga rangatira o te wakaminenga o nga hapu o Nu Tirani The Chiefs of the Confederation of the sub-tribes of New Zealand and Wikitoria te Kuini o Ingarangi Victoria the Queen of England Below is the full text of the Treaty. The following notes highlight words relevant to Incorporation of New Zealand. Note 1: Maori have long argued that the English is not a correct translation. By placing each version line by line alongside each other, one can see that there are visible differences. Note 2: The first line Ko Wikitoria te Kuini o Ingarangi in Maori translates as Victoria the Queen of England. However the translation used in the English version of the Treaty is the name of the Corporation Sole HER MAJESTY VICTORIA Queen of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland. This is the first party to the Treaty. The second party is Te Wakaminenga o Nga Hapu o Nu Tireni The Confederation of the United Tribes of New Zealand. Term Confederations refers to a group of States. Note 3: The term Kawanatanga is translated into English as Her Majestys Sovereign authority. Kawanatanga is the transliteration of the term Government. However the English translation asserts the power of Her Majestys Sovereign Authority. Note 4: Kawanatanga is further translated as Civil Government and rights and powers of Sovereignty. Note 5: Rangatira is translated as Chiefs who are treated as the corporate leaders and expected to make decisions on behalf of the United Tribes Corporation. Only those chiefs who signed the Treaty joined the Corporation. Rangatira is also translated as functionary relating to William Hobson. To further fit corporate speak rangatiratanga is translated as just rights and possession. Note 6. The word wenua is translated as property. Land was never regarded as property. No-one could own Earth Mother. Note 7: The word tuku or tukua is translated as appoint, empower, cede, imparts. There is no way the Chiefs would have ceded their power and their hapu land to anyone. Note 8. Color is used to highlight certain words or phrases so you can see how the missionary Henry Williams translated the Maori into English. His translation is not of the same mindset of the native chiefs. The color green indicates that the English translation is not in direct alignment with the original Maori. A green arrow links the English with the original Maori.
33
34
10.0 FINDING AN HONOURABLE PATH FORWARD

The Incorporation of New Zealand aka the Government has not served all the people Maori and non-Maori, this land and its flora and fauna. The government system has served less than 1% of the worlds population. Its sole purpose is to control humanity, Mother Earth and all her resources. The court case of the Urewera Four has been well timed to distract the New Zealand public from the asset sales. Terrorism is a great distracter. Now is the right time to share this article. Four years later and millions of taxpayer dollars spent by the Crown in pursuing the Urewera case it is now in court. Previously it was postponed several times to the disappointment of the accused and their supporters. This time it was allowed to proceed. The sale of New Zealands assets needs a distractor. What better than the Urewera Four and terrorism. The Urewera Four do not belong in court. They belong at home with their families. Now is the time to call on the heart of Aotearoa New Zealand to remain focused on what is truly important the freedom of all her people and stopping the sale of her land to the real terrorists large state owned and/or operated corporations. The judgment by Justice Miller stopping the sale of the Crafar farms was unexpected. The unity of Maori and non-Maori New Zealanders who came together to buy the farms and were refused because the government had agreed to sell to a Chinese buyer, Part of the condition for this sale to the Chinese buyer is that the State Owned Enterprise Landcorp would co manage. Most people even some politicians do not understand the ways of parliament, government and the jurisdiction of the court. This article is about bringing to light the secrecy that has shrouded the truth for too long. Wealth is a perception. Without people wealth does not exist. Reclaiming our right as human beings is the greatest wealth there is. It is human beings who create ideas and find ways to make dreams come true. It is human beings who love, laugh, cry, sing, dance, and celebrate. It is human beings, who embrace, forgive, build friendship and move forward. Finding an honorable path forward is essential. It must be a path that honours all people, the land, the flora and the fauna. It must be a path that honours forgiveness of those who unwittingly served the Unholy Alliance. Those who knew what was really happening must never govern again. Immense courage is required. Already we see this courage is starting to grow amongst individuals and their alliances. This article has been sent to those friends who are doing what it takes to seed the new. Please feel free to pass it forward. From the compost new covenants are being seeded. New ways of exchanging goods and services are emerging. As we each help more and more people release themselves from the grip of the Corporations Sole, and we begin to demonstrate there is another path, we free the true Soul to emerge. In Unity and Friendship we will make it. With hand over heart we will remember our truth. This is the real challenge, for truth is what will set us and our planetary Earth Mother Papatuanuku free to become, Ao-te-a-roa - Realm of the Eternal Light New Zealand - Land of New Zeal Shining A Light on Freedom For All Human Beings For All Light Beings
35
11.0 APPENDICES
1. Full letter from Pope Innocent 111 to King John, April 24, 1214 2. The Mortgage System 3. Links 11.1. Full letter from Pope Innocent 111, to King John, April 24, 1214
[This is the heading to this letter.] "INNOCENT, BISHOP, SERVANT OF THE SERVANTS OF GOD, TO HIS WELL-BELOVED SON IN CHRIST, JOHN ILLUSTRIOUS KING OF THE ENGLISH, AND TO HIS LEGITIMATE FREE-BORN HEIRS FOR EVER." "The King of kings and Lord of lords, Jesus Christ, a priest for ever after the order of Melchisedech, has so established in the Church His kingdom and His priesthood. That the one is a kingdom of priests and the other a royal priesthood, as is testified by Moses in the Law and by Peter in his Epistle; and over all He has set one whom He has appointed as His Vicar on earth, so that, as every knee is bowed to Jesus, of things in heaven, and things in earth, and things under the earth, so all men should obey His Vicar and strive that there may be one fold and one shepherd." Selected Letters of Pope Innocent III, concerning England (1198-1216), Thomas Nelson and Sons Ltd., 1956. Page 177 .... So that those provinces which from of old have had the Holy Roman Church as their proper teacher in
spiritual matters should now in temporal things also have her as their peculiar sovereign. You, whom God has chosen as a suitable minister to effect this, by a devout and spontaneous act of will. And on the general advice of your barons have offered and yield, in the form of an annual payment of a thousand marks, yourself and your kingdoms of England and Ireland. With all their rights and appurtenances, the Holy Roman Church and to us and our successors, to be our right and our property as is stated in your official letter attested by a golden seal, the literal tenor of which is as follows: 'John, by the grace of God king of England, lord of Ireland, duke of Normandy and Aquitaine, count of Anjou, to all the faithful of Christ who may see this charter, greeting in the Lord. 'By this charter attested by our golden seal we wish it to be known to you all that, having in many things offended God and Holy Church our mother and being therefore in the utmost need of divine mercy and possessing nothing but ourselves and our kingdoms. That we can worthily offer as due amends to God and the Church. We desire to humble ourselves for the sake of Him who for us humbled Himself even unto death; and inspired by the grace of the Holy Spirit not induced by force nor compelled by fear. But of our own good and spontaneous will and on the general advice of our barons we offer and freely yield to God. And to SS Peter and Paul His apostles, and to the Holy Roman Church our mother, and to our lord Pope Innocent III and his catholic successors. The whole kingdom of England and the whole kingdom of Ireland with all their rights and appurtenances for the remission of our sins and the sins of our whole family, both the living and the dead. And now, receiving back these kingdoms from God and the Roman Church and holding them a feudatory vassal, in the presence of our venerable father, lord Nicholas, bishop of Tusculum Legate of the Apostolic See, and of Pandulf, subdeacon. And member of household fealty henceforth to our lord aforesaid, Pope Innocent and to his catholic successors and to the Roman Church, in the terms here in under stated. And we have publicly paid liege homage for the said kingdoms to God, and to the Holy Apostles Peter and Paul, and to the Roman Church, and to our lord aforesaid, Pope Innocent III. At the hands of the said legate who accepts our homage in place and instead of our said lord, the Pope; and we bind in perpetuity our successors and legitimate heirs, that without question they must similarly render fealty and acknowledge
36
homage to the Supreme Pontiff. Holding office at the time and to the Roman church. As a token of this our perpetual offering and concession we will and decree that out of the proper and special revenues of our said kingdoms. In lieu of all service and payment which we should render for them, the Roman church is to receive annually, without prejudice to the payment of Peter's pence, one thousand marks sterling. Five hundred at the feast of Michael and five hundred at Easter that is, seven hundred for the kingdom of England and three hundred for the kingdom of Ireland, subject to the maintenance for us and our heirs of our jurisdiction, privileges, and regalities. Desiring all these terms, exactly as stated to be forever ratified and valid. We bind our successors and ourselves and not to contravene them. And if any of our successors or us shall presume to contravene them, then, no matter who he be, unless on due warning he come to his senses, let him lose the title to the kingdom, and let this document of offer and concession remain ever valid. 'I, John, by grace of God king of England and lord of Ireland, will from this hour henceforward be faithful to God and Saint Peter and the Roman Church and my lord Pope Innocent III and his catholic successors. I will not take part in deed, word, agreement, or plan whereby they should lose life or limb or be treacherously taken prisoners, any injury to them, if aware of it. I will prevent and will check if I can and otherwise, I will notify them as soon as possible. Or inform a person whom I can trust without fail to tell them; any counsel they have entrusted to me either personally or by envoys or by letter I will keep secret. Nor will I wittingly divulge it to anyone to his or her disadvantage. I will help in maintaining and defending, to the utmost of my power, against all men, the patrimony of Saint Peter, and particularly the kingdom of England and the kingdom of Ireland. So help me God and the Holy Gospels of God whereon I swear. 'To prevent any questioning of these terms at any time in the future, and for the greater surety of our offer and concession, we have caused this charter to be made and to be sealed with our golden seal. And as tribute for this the first year we pay a thousand marks sterling to the Roman Church by the hand of the said legate. (The witness were listed here), signed October 3, 1213 'This offer and concession so piously and wisely made we regard as acceptable and valid, and we take under the protection of Saint Peter and of ourselves your person and the persons of your heirs together with the said kingdoms and their appurtenances. And all other goods, which are now reasonably held or may in future, be- so held. To you and to your heirs, according to the terms set out above and by the general advice of our brethren. We grant the said kingdoms in fief and confirm them by this privilege, on condition that any of your heirs on receiving the crown will publicly acknowledge this as a fief held of the Supreme Pontiff and of the Roman Church, and will take an oath of fealty to them. Let no man, therefore, has power to infringe this document of our concession and confirmation, or presume to oppose it. If any man dare to do so, let him know that he will incur the anger of Almighty God and of SS Peter and Paul, His apostles. Amen, amen, Amen. (Rota) I, Innocent, bishop of the Catholic Church, have signed. Farewell. (The other signers were listed below)
Selected Letters of Pope Innocent III, concerning England (1198-1216), Thomas Nelson and Sons Ltd, 1956. Page 178-183
11.2. The Mortgage System When one wants to purchase a home one usually needs to borrow money. The bank is the main lender of mortgages. A simple example- on a $350,000 home the borrower presents a deposit usually 20% of the
37
purchase price. The bank provides a loan for the remaining 80%. Loan plus interest repayments can span 30 years What really happens is: Borrower presents deposit = $70,000. The bank agrees to loan the balance of $280,000. BUT it only lends a tiny percentage e.g.- 0.02% of the $280,000 = $70. The remaining $279,930 does not exist it is thin air. This is called fractional banking. The bank gives a tiny fraction, the borrower gives a larger fraction. On this basis the bank takes title of the property that the borrower paid $69,930 more than the bank for. If the borrower takes 30 years to repay the loan/thin air, the bank now has real money in exchange for thin air. If the borrower finds they cannot repay the loan at any time the bank will foreclose. The borrower loses everything. The Bank repeats this every time the house is sold. (Reference Rupa vs BNZ http://www.noconfidence.org.nz) A check today reveals that $280,000 borrowed at 5.79% taking 30 years to pay equals $310,807 interest. Your total payment is $350,00 + $310,807 = $670,000. But banks want you to keep borrowing so once you have enough equity (money reserves) they entice you to do up your home, buy a second home at the beach, buy a car, go on a holiday and on it goes. Another common scenario is when there is an economic boom. Banks will entice borrowers with low/no deposits and low interest rates. They know that many will be tempted. In an economic depression, interest rates rise along with other goods and services. Too many borrowers default once again the bank forecloses. 11.3. Links BBC on the lead up to the Coronation http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WUMVh3UlRT4&feature=mfu_in_order&list=UL The Coronation Event http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WUMVh3UlRT4&feature=mfu_in_order&list=UL Background To The Ture Whenua Maori, Maori Land Act 1993 http://www.scribd.com/doc/19964341/Interview-Hohepa-Mapiria-Joseph-Murphy-Royal - Regent -307074 No Confidence Party http://www.noconfidence.org.nz/ A Spiritual Economics Book by Mary Elizabeth Croft http://www.freedomfiles.org/mary-book.pdf Relating To Life www.relatingtolife.com Love For Life www.loveforlife.com.au The Calling of an Indigenous Heart http://www.simonkaiwai.com/?page_id=412 Get the Power Back http://www.getthepowerback.info/ Living Our Sovereignty Kiwi Can Do http://shnta.kiwicando.com/temp
38
Its rather too late in the peace to tell us the truth now. Why didnt you tell us in 1840 or even in 1986 when you tampered with our MOAI HAPU SOVEREIGNTY 1852 CONSTITUTION? You are as ignorant as your Settlers Government here made sure you were all settled before the original Natives families were then plundered their land and resources and quality of life for now you pay for the complete damage bill dated back to 1835 Memorial when your Alien invasion began. Now its MOAI Sovereign Confederations time to Settlement under our own Terms of Agreement and Customary Title ownership of these Moai Lands. Moai Crown Royalist Assignee Sovereign States Confederation Tenant Chief Creditors set this Bill Debt Charge Indictment Commercial Lien of One Trillion Trillion British Pounds Sterling Bullion Vault Gold Bullion Moai Water Currency values set against your entire Church of England Roman Empire Catholic Church Private Owners, (E)State Corporate Sole Elizabeth Windsor and State Owners Black Pope Adolfo Nicolas Pachon Stolen Wealth though your combined Alien British-European German, Irish. Scottish, English, French, Russian, Greek, Turkish, Spanish, Italian, Roman Aliens Theft of our Indigenous Natives Lands all over the world started from the theft of our Bloodlines Natives Ancestral Inheritance Black African Nubian mans Pyramids, Sun God Ra Spirit Obelisks their Land. Then theft of our Royal Tahitian-African Rock Earth Moai God Memorial Statue Dna of Gods Grace Face Superior Ruler of me us Moai God Instructed me to split the Lien Indictment Bill over your (E)States Country ownership Interest Values of Aotea New Zealand Crown Government first Lien Debtor owes One Thousand Trillion British Pounds Sterling Bullion Vault Gold Bullion Moai Water Currency values as 0000000001% of Debts owed Fractional Banking makes up 75% of stolen moneys backdated to Moai 1835 Declaration of Independence refering to King William III Bank of England Commercial Lien Contract with British Admiralty Law of the Seas. Succeeded by King William IV who gave Moai Tahitian Hapu Chiefs their own Admiralty Law of the Seas Flag Sovereign Jurisdiction Self Government as a Moai Trading Nation State as it was as it still is now Take notice you named 2 Natural Persons above & Evelyn Rothschild Bankers 300 Royal Families failed to refute all Moai Liens, Allegations which now under Moai Gods Superior Law of his Earth Word Creation Split you Bill Debt Commercial Liens across the whole Worlds natives Indigenous Countries Moai Crown Confederation Represents the Sovereign People Membership from your Children Adopted out from your British European Crimes of Church and State (E)State into Moai God Crown African-Tahitian Monarch Sovereigns Estate Free States Wealth returned back to God s Sovereign People from you (E)State Satan s Church Bishops, Archbishops, Pope s Vatican City of Secret Stolen Inheritance, Jesus and his Lost People! Moai God Statue Carvers Builders Sovereign Male Royal Blood Dna Surname Tohunga Spirit Tahitian and our matched Black African Male Blood Dna Sun God Statue Ra Obelisk and Power- House Pyramid Carvers and Builders. Legally challenge the Real GODS TRUTH LAW AUTHORITY Authenticity of the Vatican City Roman Pope Bishops Catholic Church Priesthoods. GODS INSTRUCTIONS to Build GODS MEMORIALS that the DEAD Corporate Sole Person called VATICAN-CITY and his FRAUD POPE FRANCIS BLACK POPE Adolfo Nicolas Pachon. Is Usurping the Higher Authority to GOD through Corrupted PRIESTS and BISHOPS who must Challenge MOAI GOD as GOD Himself Carved in Stone Buried Deep into his Soil Earth TITLE LAND! The POPES GOD is a FAKE Belief of JESUS GOD who doesnt come from ROME and is not our TAHITIAN AFRICAN GOD who gave our Black African Tahitian Instructions to Build these Pyramids Obelisk Sun God Ra and Moai Statues. To Mark Gods Earth World Title MEMORIALS for our Ancestors HANDS not hands of a WHITE SKIN ALIEN man stole and shifted our GOD MEMORIALS off our Land is the OFFENSE against you DUMB BRAIN DEAD CORPSE FAKE WHITE SKIN BRITISH EUROPEAN ALIEN INVADERS.
39
Moai God s Law Monarch Sovereign Crown State Confederations Property Lien Indictment Warrants Chapter 1 Statements in this manual are numbered in Sections of MOAI CITATIONS to Moai Crown Indicted Lien Claims INTRODUCTION This is a Moai Uetaha Wanoa Royal Tahitian African Monarchy Sovereign Supreme Court Case Manual Instruction Moai God Crown Gods Law CITINGS versus Crown Corporation Sole Monarchy Sovereign Queen of England. Sec 1/ Numbered. This manual is intended purely as Gods Truth communication information in accordance with rights of free speech. It constitutes general, specific truth of Moai Gods Tikanga Lore/Law Doctrines of Discovery Title to Gods Earth World Planet as fixed extant in his World Land Title Claim Manual of advanced Customary legal advocacy advice. Anyone seeking Moai legal advice should consult a competent professional. The author, editor publisher guarantees from Moai Earth God, in using this must accept any risk to thoroughly study Moai Tikanga Moai lore/law before practicing any of this material information successfully protect the reader from harm. Readers must take full responsibility for the consequences of any actions taken based on the contents of this manual. You may be best off reading this as Gods Superior Authority, Truth passed down to Sovereign Monarch Moai Wanoa Uetaha inheritors. 2/ Royal Tahitian Family of Gods Whakapapa un-refuted Polynesian Ancestral Inheritance to Moai Pacific Ring of Fire Boundary Claim area of Na Atua E Wa Aotea, Mu Islands, New Zealand and Pacific Islands. Moai Wanoa Uetaha Hapu Sovereign Spirit People are male Carvers and Builders of Moai Memorial Statue of Gods Grace Face Bloodline Dna, linked directly to our Black African Male Dna Nubians. Who built the Spirit Obelisk Sun Ra to God and the Pyramids as Gods Powerhouse of Knowledge and Technology, our Ancestors discovered and wrote Gods Stone Bible Scriptures under his instructions, as we Claimed in these Affidavits. You can learn of these documents and procedures being used by many indigenous Native Customs for Centuries prevails over Mans corrupted Laws Acts. If you use these documents and procedures you would be at less risk to change your life in very major ways, some of which may be very pleasant to know that Truth is the wanted Freedom from the Devil Worshipers stealing the Sovereigns Lands and Resources. The use of Commercial Liens as described in this manual is EXTREMELY high profile. For most readers, it is advisable to use the "higher-profile" Truth applications of Freedom Technology. Generally, thinking, its more productive, useful, and exciting to create alternative advanced new systems, rather than fight older systems that are plagued with uncertainty, no Constitution or clear mandate from the True Monarch Sovereigns of the Land you live on, share equitably. As it stands Corporate Sole Alien Sovereign persons are controlling Governments. 3/ Disclaimer is especially important, because this is a relatively new strategy, not yet been subjected to Supreme Court challenge. Now this will take place, the soundness of this strategy shall be fully known. The Commercial Lien Claimant Arrest Warrant Strategy evolving, as information of Moai Crown has been hidden by the Corporate Sole Person, is being discovered daily. If you use this strategy, your name will be on a Successful Supreme Court case! This prospect should thrill you with honesty, certainty of Moai Crown Sovereign Monarch Confederation you can trust depend on. 4/ Liens are very powerful, and should be treated with respect. Moai Crown advocates the use of these liens against any Government Officials, in particular, Corporate Soles who violate Tikanga Moai Gods Lore/Law of Truth. And Moai Crown Confederations British UK Land laws of England, while the Grace of Tahitian Natives
40
MOAI GODS FACE of Administrative Authority Sovereign Monarchy Royal Tahitian MOAI WANOA UETAHA STATUE stands in Queen Elizabeth II Great Court in London. We honor the fact there are many virtuous people in government offices that truly strive to harm no one on the face of it, but politically benefits less people in society as possible, but for themselves and their Corporate Sole Businesses. The liens described in this manual are directed towards these harmless officials. 5/ Scope & Purpose of Moai Crown Sovereign State Monarch Creditor Assignee enforced Acts of Bill Charge Debts" Manual. 6/ Manual This manual is an introduction and primer to the Commercial Lien Strategy. It shall determine the final word on the subject. The authors and editors have synthesized material from several authenticated truth historical sources, organized into a comprehensible form to the average reader. After reading this manual, you will know the fundamental principles of this strategy. This understanding, plus the Bibliography set out in Appendix A, will allow you to administer and use this research in confidence on your own full sovereign authority of Moai Crown. 7/ Notes Sample Briefs Included with this manual is an Appendix containing sample legal briefs, based upon actual examples used by others. You will have to reformat these briefs using your word processing software, and you MUST adapt them to your situation, and to the requirements of your state or locality. These are not Documents to be "fill-in-the-blank" forms. They are real Documents of Title Claims. 7/b Commercial Lien Strategy Background Faced with corrupt lawyers and judges, no litigant can expect to win in court by simply playing defense. To beat them, you must be able to scare them, to be able to make them respect you, means you must be able to take the offense and attack them personally corporately. Unfortunately, judges, lawyers, and other government officials enjoy various levels of personal immunity provided by both law and as a "professional courtesy." How do you sue a lawyer for malpractice? You hire another lawyer if you can find one wholl take the case on. 8/ Constitution how do you sue an IRD agent for violating your Constitutional rights? With great difficulty like how you sue a judge for railroading you in court? You dont do that rather you ask for a Jury Trial. He cant answer to Gods Law or Tikanga Moai Lore, he swears to the Queen. As a practical matter, private citizens cant sue the Prime Minister of New Zealand, the Governor General, the judge, or even an IRD Agent for failing to obey or enforce their own man made Laws. If we try to sue in court, compel our government officials to obey the law and perform their lawful duties, the judges routinely ignore our petitions and laugh us out of court, about to change with Moai Crown Law Land Law. British UK Land Laws of England, back to our old original Pound Note Money Currency.
41
9/ Defense legal and de facto immunities shield government personnel from being sued for committing crimes against the People, the public is legally disarmed, unable to aggressively sue the government or its agents and compel them to obey the Law. As a result, the publics legal posture is fundamentally defensive: try to duck, dodge, and hide in legal loopholes to defend ourselves against the Crown government and the courts. We try to escape, evade, and avoid, but we seldom counter-attack against our antagonists, largely because we think there are no lawful weapons to do so. However, it appears that a powerful offensive legal weapon is now here has been discovered, tested, and proven for common Citizens the commercial lien. We dont try to sue government officials for failing to perform his/her lawful duties. Instead, we simply file a lien that encumbers the officials personal property and credit rating like a ton of bricks until he voluntarily satisfies our demand to perform his lawful duty, and we, in turn, voluntarily agree to excise the lien as collective class action. Some Examples of the Strategy 10/ Example 1 Edward J. Wagner, an hourly, unionized employee at General Electric, received Notices of Levy from the IRS, garnishing his wages and moneys received from several other sources. Wagner tried to persuade G.E. not to honor the Notices, since they were not properly attested as "true bills of commerce." His efforts met with no success. After giving G.E. proper Notice and Demand, Wagner and his wife filed a Commercial Lien in the amount of $224,640,00.00. In the lien, Wagner impounded G.E. inventory that he had worked on (including air conditioning units, analyzing equipment, etc.) as security for the lien. This is similar to an auto mechanic impounding a car he had repaired ("mechanics lien"). This meant that G.E. could not lawfully sell or transfer the equipment until the lien was either extinguished or satisfied. Among the reasons for the high dollar amount are that the law allows for such high sums as rewards for damages incurred, and it generally has to be large enough in relation to the size of the company involved, to get its attention. Otherwise such a large company might just ignore it. Consequently, a legal war followed, and by June of 92, G.E. had gone to court several times trying to remove Wagners lien, all without any real success. This was in spite of the fact that G.E. had the best, most highly paid, and highly motivated lawyers. In June of 92, the first major victory for the Wagners came. The IRS issued four different official Releases of Levy, one to General Electric, plus three other places where they had wages and income that the IRS had levied the Port of Seattle, Dean Witter Reynolds, and Ohio State Life Insurance Company. These effectively released the IRSs attachment on the Wagners income and assets. Thats a pretty solid testimonial to the power of the arguments in Mr. Wagners lien. 11/ Example 2 In August 1992, Mr. Nelson Starr, who lives in Florida, filed a lien on several federal judges, the Commissioner of the IRS, the Attorney General of the United States. On one or more U.S. attorneys for the Southern District of Florida, and several other individuals, in the amount of $350,000 on each individual. The officials asked Mr. Alan Diamond, President of the Florida Bar Association, to inspect the lien and see if it was lawful or not.
42
In spite of his desire to please his powerful friends, Diamond could find nothing illegal about the lien. In fact, in a sworn affidavit, Diamond declared that, "...the document causes irreparable harm to the system of the administration of justice. While some of the harm may be compensate able at law, no degree of compensation will adequately remedy the damage to the appearance of integrity of those named and of the system of the administration of justice. In my opinion, the filing of this type of lien is a direct attack on the justice system and on the general reputations of those named in the "lien." It may negatively impact on the financial credit rating of those individuals. It will probably have a negative impact on their willingness to continue to serve as representatives of the United States. And, it constitutes an abuse of civil process that cannot be adequately remedied by an action at law. [Emphasis added]" In plain English, Diamond did not like the lien, but couldnt find any way to extinguish it. Further, he seemed to say that these liens could drive public officials right out of office! For libertarians and patriots, that is a powerful endorsement! 12/ Example 3 - Another a man in Florida filed Commercial Liens against nine IRS agents and was later taken to court by IRS agents wives. The wives tried unsuccessfully to remove the liens, because their credit cards had stopped working. The liens had compromised their credit rating, and they couldnt go shopping except with cash. Imagine the distress that the IRS agents themselves had to endure from their wives on account of these liens! Evidently, the liens hit the agents where they lived, that other actions at law could not do. 13/ Example 4 - Perhaps the most imaginative use of the Commercial Lien Strategy is a lien by Mr. Phil Marsh of the Pilot Connection against the President of the United States. The U.S. Congress, the Federal Reserve, and the Commissioner of IRS on behalf of all 250 million Americans (see Appendix B.6). For each of the 250 million Americans, the lien demands $10,000. If the lien were enforced, it would mean the government would owe the people $2.5 trillion, over half the annual Gross National Product. This "class action lien" will almost certainly never be enforced. However, if the courts find a way to extinguish it, it may have the effect of weakening the power of all liens (including the one the IRS files on us!). [Editors Note: Everything in this manual is "information" for Moai Crown Bill Charge Debt Liens, and Advocates legal advice. This caveat Lien Charge applies with particular force to Moai Crown Charge liens where the Bill Debt hangs on the persons it is accusing of the wrought on Moai Sovereigns people private property. This lien as an interesting and real life application of the Commercial Lien Strategy, not as "endorsements but as clearly stated, Moai Crown Sovereign State Monarch Creditors enforced Acts of Bills of Debts" THE POWER OF COMMERCIAL LIENS Ease of Use Although this lien strategy is explosive, its more than go off like hydrogen bombs. You need to be knowledgeable and careful to use Hydrogen, but you dont need to be a bright nuclear physicist. However, Hydrogen can blow up in your face if you handle it carelessly! Likewise, "bombing" government officials with liens is a craft, not a science, that can be used as easily by knowledgeable pro ses as it can by lawyers and legal scholars. The commercial lien is simple, inexpensive, and takes very little time. It requires no court action or judges approval. And, it has proven to be very direct and effective, if it is handled correctly. However, a few careless pro ses have had their liens "blow up" in their faces (see Chapter 5), so be meticulous when you use them.
43
Long Range You can file a commercial lien on property in another state or on property youve never seen. With a commercial lien, you can attack the personal property of your adversary at long range rather than merely fighting to defend your own property in your own back yard. This offensive capability makes the commercial lien a powerful legal weapon. With the commercial lien, you can literally take the fight to their back yards. The Helplessness of Judges The commercial lien, is authorized both by the common law and by Title 15 of the United States Code (USC), is reportedly the same lien the IRS uses to take Americans homes and cars. However, some pro se litigants do not depend upon Title 15, but upon the common law of negotiable instruments (a.k.a. Commercial Law). As such, its almost impossible to remove a commercial lien without the approval of the individual claimant who filed the lien. Although a commercial lien can be challenged by a common law court or by a 7th Amendment jury trial, it does not require a court process or a court judgment for its establishment, validity, or execution. Therefore, it appears that the courts may not be able to simply extinguish this lien on their own discretion (or on motion from the lien debtors) without the voluntary approval of the person who filed the lien. Traditionally, these liens can only be removed by the voluntary decision of the person who filed the lien, by the decision of Moai Gods Law and constitutional common-law jury trial, or by waiting 99 or 100 years. Since the common law has been smothered in the U.S.A., all judges are essentially powerless to overcome the liens. Moai Crown State Sovereign Monarchy Confederation L.A.W Before utilizing any of the procedures suggested in this manual, we strongly suggest that you join an organization called Moai Crown L.A.W." They are also experts on Customary Law Advocacy, legal and criminal court procedures, as well as liens in general. They also have great expertise regarding Title 42 (civil rights violation suits. For more details see Report #LAW01 The Right Way L.A.W. Chapter 2 - Theory of Commercial Lien Strategy Introduction To effectively use the Commercial Lien Strategy, you should have a good grasp of the principles of law involved. Immediately follow this Introduction, written from a Christian/Theistic perspective, explaining the foundations of the common law. (The author user has not copyrighted this material, and wishes to remain anonymous. The same author also composed several of the briefs listed in Appendix B). This explanation will, no doubt, be very different from anything you have been taught. In fact, licensed attorneys may have the hardest time understanding this, because they have been taught to think only in a certain way. An intelligent lay reader will probably understand the following article without much trouble. Most of us have been hypnotized into believing that the meaningless scribbles of "legislators," "Presidents," etc.,
44
constitute "the law." After reading this chapter, one thing should be absolutely clear to you. The law is whatever you give your consent to. This insight frees you from being a "victim" and a "subject," and restores you to your rightful position of power and sovereignty. (Remember always that Territorial Gangsters [TGs] have all sorts of ways to obtain your "consent"! Standing up for your rights always involves risk.) THE COMMERCIAL AFFIDAVIT PROCESS. A Powerful Weapon by an anonymous Christian patriot The Commercial Affidavit Process or "CAP" is perhaps one of the most powerful devices available to the common man used for righting wrongs and accomplishing justice. The process is not new, as some may believe. At its foundation are the laws of commerce, which spring from the eternal, immutable Laws of God and those laws have been in force since the beginning of human existence. Provoke the use of the Commercial Affidavit Process against you and you provoke the wrath of all that is just and right against you. Those who make themselves available to the CAP system are equipping themselves with a very powerful equalizer. Make no mistake! The CAP is a very lethal weapon in the war against injustice. The expression "equal under the law" again has real meaning, thanks to CAP. When CAP methodology is properly loaded and sighted on a wrongdoer, success is "as good as in the bag." The Process is powerful and dangerous to those who are in the line of fire. There is no escape: either acquiesce or justly recompense or suffer the awful consequences. And, those consequences can be calamitous as will be shown with Moai Crown Sovereign Monarch holds Gods Mana Memorial Statues contradictions of the Queens Sovereign Monarch The Foundation of Law of God There are basically three classes of laws: The Laws of God, which encompass the Laws of Nature; Law of the Land Law of the Land also referred to as the Common Law; and lastly there is Private Law, or man-made law, referred to as Contract Law. Usurpation of power is void Our Founding Fathers believed that it was self-evident that the God of Nature is the sovereign of the universe and everything in it. (As well as mankind) and that he had endowed all mankind with "certain unalienable rights" making them self-directing sovereigns, which means that any governments instituted among men derive their just powers (only) from the consent of the governed, who are the source of earthly power and authority. Hence any attempt to exercise any powers NOT conveyed by the People is unjust unauthorized, and any act done pursuant to such usurpation of power is void. Moai Crown uses this self-directing practice as sovereign monarchs. They were further convinced that Gods temporal law for mankind was expressed in the law of the land. Common law is common-sense law. It is simple, straightforward, self evident, primarily because it is based on Gods Laws, the foundational law of the union of States.
45
Equity Law The Founding Fathers authorized three legal systems in the Constitution, first Common Law, secondly Equity Law, thirdly Admiralty Law, which is the law of the sea. Gradually Equity Law has displaced Common Law until today the Common Law is rarely heard of or understood because it has been covered up and hidden away by the legal profession for very understandable business reasons. Such people are pursuing their own private agenda. In fact the Common Law is generally looked upon as obscene, example: To have such a common law marriage is considered to be unclean. Why? The first marriage license in the United States was issued in 1863. The question is not whether some third party should or should not perform the service; it is whether sovereigns must get permission from their servants (the government) before they can be married. Moai Crown holds Sovereign Monarchy Power of Gods Grace to do this Private Law Private Law is that law which comes into being when people enter into agreements creating the rules and terms by which they agree to be bound together. State and federal constitutions are examples of private law. They come under the heading of contract law because they are contracts that establish governments and are designed to protect the People from the Government. To keep the government under control, the People were very precise in the language they used to make it perfectly clear exactly what powers were being delegated AND that any powers not specifically delegated were reserved (by the People) to the states or People. Moai Crown is a Sovereign Republican Private State. It should be remembered that the People are the sovereigns of State governments and the States are the sovereigns of the federal government. Thus the People, either directly or indirectly, are the sovereigns over both governments. The States have been given specific and limited power. They also made sure there were provisions that safeguarded the Peoples right to abolish or change that government and to create a different one if they chose. Moai Crown Limits the temporary rule power of New Zealand Government. Public Law is a form of private law that results when laws are made in proper application of the delegated authority conveyed to the legislators. Title 18 (the Federal Criminal Code) is an example of public law. It was drafted to grant unto non-citizens the protections defenses Citizens have under common law; Title 18 doesnt apply to sovereign Citizens, who answer direct to violations of Gods Law. Administrative Law is one term used to describe private law that comes into existence when someone acquires dominion over others and can dictate to them what the law is. Title 26 (the Internal Revenue Code) in an example of Administrative Law; it and the other federal titles classified by congress as "non-public" (administrative) laws, thus apply only to subjects of the federal government. In 1938 the United States abandoned Public Law and adopted an unconstitutional system called Public Policy. An understanding of this distinction is so vital that the definitions of these terms follow: Public Law That portion of law deals with the powers, rights duties, capacities and incapacity of government and its delegated authority. Those laws are concerned with a government in its political capacity, considered in its quasi-private personality, i.e., is capable of holding or exercising rights or acquiring and dealing with property in the character of an individual. Public Policy The rules and procedures (policy) of a sovereign over its subjects, holds that no subject can lawfully do that which has a tendency to be injurious to the public or against the public good as defined by the sovereign.
46
Public policy is set by legislative acts pursuant thereto, by judicial and administrative promulgating of rules and regulations. Reassert your sovereign rights such rules and regulations are therefore not laws but rather terms imposed by contract agreements. Its the contracts themselves, which make these rules and regulations binding. If you are not a party to those contracts, not a subject (property) of the government, you can make yourself a party by volunteering to comply. But once you decide to play the game you are compelled by the rules of that game to continue to play. Once compelled, the best out is to reassert your sovereign rights. The very concept of Public Policy and its inherent usurpation of power from the sovereign People is so addictive and has become so widely accepted by bureaucrats in all levels of government that they act as if they are the masters of the People. This shift in government was instituted with the Supreme Courts decision in the Erie Railroad case, as a result of which, all Supreme Court decisions prior to that time are being treated as no longer relevant in equity court proceedings. And so another milestone was reached in the conspiracy to overthrow the rights of the People.This Administrative Law is much like Roman law, which is also called Civil Law. Conceptually, Roman or Civil Law, is practiced in most of Europe, is diametrically opposite to the Common Law. Under Roman or Civil Law you are guilty until proven innocent and have only those rights your master the government chooses to grant you; and what your master gives, he can take away. Under the Common Law as practiced in America, you are innocent until proven guilty and retain all rights not delegated to government. Under Moai Gods Law, you are Guilty and find it hard to be innocent. We are seeing more and more of this Roman class of laws in this country: if you are charged you are treated as being guilty until proven innocent. If that is happening to you, its because of your legal status or what "they" perceive as your legal status. If your legal status is that of being a sovereign Citizen your unalienable rights are being violated! Principles of Law Making In the days before the turn of the century in America, the custom was for those studying law to study the Bible and the laws contained therein so that those principles would occupy a preeminent place in the minds of those practicing law. This is not the case today; rather the opposite is true. The eternal truths contained in the Bible have been lost from the view of those who need them the most. It is still the best place to learn about laws generally, as well as other eternal truths. The concept of a system of laws not founded upon those eternal truths is tantamount to building a house on quick sand. The People are the sovereigns In New Zealand and Pacific Islands, sovereign power resides in and comes only from the People. "We the People" are the sovereigns. All the power and authority the government has, was given to it by the People! If we dont have the right to do a thing, then we cannot delegate such a right to any government! ("We cannot give to anyone or anything any power or authority we do not have!") Moai Hapu 1835 Declaration of Independence of our Nation-State British Flag Jurisdiction as our Legal binding Constitution It is controversial to this principle that representatives of the People legislators or bureaucrats or judges pretend they can make laws to implement powers that we the People did not and cannot give them? It is selfevident! Yet they pretend they can do virtually anything they or even a majority of them merely agree among
47
themselves (vote) to do what they want for their Corporate Businesses. They publish interpretations of laws and promulgate rules based on those interpretations, render decisions that are clearly antithetical to the concepts set forth in our Moai Hapu 1835 Declaration of Independence of our Nation-State Flag as our Legal binding Constitution. Are Founding Documents of Title to Aotea New Zealand understood and expounded them to us from King William IV in Westminster Parliament. He gave us his Jurisdiction, which Government of New Zealand violates their sworn oath to uphold our Moai Constitution. Queen Elizabeth II Crown Government of New Zealand Know this that those few if any who discover such usurpation will have the perseverance, let alone the financial means and time required to find a qualified, a willing attorney to utilize the court system to expose their usurpation. And bring them to account and thus rectify their malfunction. Moai now brings each Alien Offender to Account and make them individually pay for their offending fraud acts! They also promote and rely on the general MISCONCEPTION that any statute passed by a legislature is valid. It is impossible for there unconstitutional Government to be legal at law. It violates Moai Crown Constitution shall prevail! This is succinctly stated as follows: "The general rule is that an unconstitutional Government statute, though having the form and name of law, is in reality no law. But is wholly void and ineffective for any purpose since unconstitutionality dates from the time of its enactment, not merely from the date of the decision so branding it. An unconstitutional law, in legal contemplation, is as inoperative as it has never been legal, passed at law. Unconstitutional law is void "Since an unconstitutional law is void, the general principles follow that it imposes no duties, confers no rights, creates no office. And bestows no power or authority on anyone, affords no protection and justifies no acts performed under it. So no one is bound to obey an unconstitutional law and no courts are bound to enforce It." 16 Am Jur 2nd 177 Ignorance of the law excuses no one must pay the consequences on these Arrest Warrant Property Seizure Indictment Notices Moai God Jurisdiction Superior Sovereign Monarchy Mana Henua (Over human, animal, bird, fish, land, water, air and space) "The general rule is that an unconstitutional act of the Legislature protects no one. It is said that all persons are presumed to know the law, meaning that ignorance of the law excuses no one; if any person acts under an unconstitutional statute. He does so at his peril and must take the consequences." 16 Am Jur 2d 178 Moai Crown State Government use Moai Constitution and Moai Earth God Jurisdiction to Bill Charge Debtor each of 38,000 New Zealand Government public servants, 121 Politicians, 2000 Judges, Lawyers etc Laws of Tikanga Moai God Pure Lore "Where rights secured by the Constitution are involved, there can be no rule making or legislation which would abrogate them." Miranda v. Arizona, 384 US 436 at 491 in order for a law to be proper, it must be just. It must protect equally the rights of all without violating the rights of any. There isnt any thing mysterious about proper law; it is based on reasonableness and common sense, and is harmonious with the Laws of Tikanga Moai God
48
Pure Lore. Check a law against this measure to see if it fits the mold of eternal truth and justice: say to yourself, "Would I be unwilling to have this law applied to myself or my closest friend?" If such application seems repugnant to you, if it seems unfair or unjust, then there is truly something wrong with that law. God knows that peoples political standards are a reliable reflection of their moral standards and that the laws which they support are a good test of how they wish to be judged (Matthew 7:1). People can clearly see that taking money or stone memorials that are valuable inheritance from some one by force is a crime when done by individuals, such as Queen Victoria who stole our Moai Memorial of Gods Grace Authority. But they may fail to recognize the criminality of the same act when done by government. For example, how would you feel if you had a particular "entitlement" and the government told you that you were authorized to collect a portion of this government handout from each of your neighbors? Lets suppose that your "entitlement" is food stamps: instead of giving you stamps, the government gives you a list of people from whom you are "authorized" to collect the money to buy the food. Then how would you feel if they told you it was all right to force your neighbors to give you the money? And every time you needed more food, you had to do it all over again? Would that be right? If not, why? Would changing the name of the collector make it right? Would it go against your grain to do so? How would your neighbors feel when you presented your "authorization"? How would you feel if your next door neighbors were coming to collect payments FROM YOU for some other "entitlement" program they were "authorized" to collect? Commercial Affidavit The Commercial Affidavit Process is a pre-common law process. It is also referred to as a "commercial law process," is not to be confused with the [Uniform] Commercial Code and other manipulated and complicated rules and regulations. It is a pre-common law process because until there is a disagreement, there is no dispute. All that is being done is the establishment of claims and obligations. The purpose of the CAP is to make claims and determine if the accused agrees or not. If the Accused does not contest the claims there is no dispute to be adjudicated thus the appropriate damages are consensual and legally agreed-upon. Thus it is pre-judicial. It may also be completely non-judicial if it is properly (composed of un-rebut-able truth) successfully implemented. Moai Affidavits are un-refuted. The term "commercial" as used herein refers to any dealings people have among themselves. Thus the "laws of commerce" refers to the just rules of procedure governing human relationships. The self-evident principles of right and wrong are the foundation of common law. Commercial Law COMMERCIAL LAW the foundation of rests solidly on the bedrock of justice and common sense. These laws are so sound and so universally accepted that they cannot with impunity be overturned, overwritten or tampered with in any way. Theyre founded on eternal truths, needing no proof from anyone to justify their validity (i.e., self-evident); they are immutable; they provide equal justice to all parties of interest and thus are completely fair. That is the KEY to their power. All other just laws spring out from this truth foundation. (By contrast, corrupted laws are mere shadows of these true and correct principles.)
49
Justice is delivered quickly, simply, fairly and conclusively with the Commercial Affidavit Process. May be a terrible disappointment to wrongdoers who are confident they can get away with their illegitimate activities. Those who are subverting just laws, setting them aside, covering them up, creating shadow-law or colorable law and just generally using self-serving laws to subject and plunder their fellow man are in for a rude awakening. In summary, the Common Law grows out of the laws of commerce which themselves are based upon self-evident truths. Such truths are commonly expressed as maxims. Maxims in Law Maxims are as much a part of the laws of human relations (commerce) as a foundation is a part of a building. They are fundamental and immutable, having their basis in Gods Laws. No one of sound mind argues against them, is the bedrock of logic, reason, of common sense, and of truth. They are fundamental principles upon which all that is right, just and true is founded. Moai God sets the standards to measure the correctness of any course of positive action. The word "maxim" is defined as an expression of an absolute truth or principle. Maxims are so powerful and unequivocal that they are the foundation of all human relationships. They have the power to cut to the heart of a matter in a heartbeat with reason, logic, and authority. They cover every topic imaginable and every aspect of our lives, are not easily misunderstood, misapplied, or subverted; they are universally accepted for what they are, self-evident TRUTHS. Such are Affidavits of our Moai Dna Blood Earth Links to God. Maxims might be considered the redundant backup system when all else fails. Anyone who is not schooled in the logic of maxims is easily confused for the want of such understanding. The legal profession has a vested interest in keeping the People ignorant of these principles: protecting the need for their "Priest craft." Priest craft is "the craft of specialists who work to create the illusion their craft is too complex to be understood by anyone but themselves who wrote their Laws." It doesnt take a law degree to understand maxims. The light of truth in maxims cannot be extinguished through the evil works and craftiness of men. They may be forgotten by many, intentionally concealed by some, but they still exist, no matter what, and they wont go away! Below are maxims that surround the rightfulness lawfulness of the Commercial Affidavit Process, is by no means is an exhaustive list:
Regarding Justice All are equal under the Law. A matter must be expressed to be resolved. Claims made without accountability is void.
50
Might does not make right. Force, perjury or subornation of perjury, voids all. Fraud vitiates the most solemn promise. While the battle continues, he who first leaves the field or refuses to contend loses by default. You are free to make any decision you wish, but you are never free to escape the consequences of your decisions. A laborer is worthy of his hire. Thou shalt not steal. Notice to the agent is notice to the principal and notice to the principal is notice to the agent. Do unto others, as you would have others do unto you. Regarding Truth Truth stands supreme. Truth affects but cannot be affected. Truth is expressed in the form of an affidavit. Truth will out. An unrebutted affidavit stands as the truth. An affidavit must be rebutted point-for-point. Thou shall not bear false witness. Ignorance is no respecter, it affects all without regard to position or title. Regarding Sovereignty It is self-evident that their creator (God) endows all men, with equal and unalienable rights. The created cannot be greater than its creator. A man can give to another no more than he himself has.
51
A man may not with impunity infringe upon another mans rights. The People are Sovereign. In New Zealand the government is the servant of the "Sovereign" People. Regarding Power and Authority . . . We cannot give to anyone or anything any power or authority we do not have. Except power which resides in Moai God Statue face. Failed Legal System Although the court system MAY have an essential part to play once the Commercial Affidavit has been served AND ANSWERED, that system is not and cannot be invoked until the charges in the affidavit have been answered by (1) acquiescence, (2) rebuttal or (3) default: until that point. THERE IS NO DISAGREEMENT TO ADJUDICATE a disagreement that could arise only from a rebuttal of Affidavit. But even though it would be feasible to involve the court system to adjudicate such disagreement, no one seeking JUSTICE really would want to do so because the court system has become extremely costly. Very slow and corrupted by the conniving convolutions of man-made rules and legalisms and by the natural inclinations of those who live from the legal system to promote the financial success of the legal business! Resolution by Jury If any adjudication is found necessary (only in the event of rebuttal) it will be done by a common law jury invoked at the discretion of the Claimant (see "RESOLUTION BY JURY" below). In stark contrast to the equity court system of today, the CAP system is so effective in exposing the truth, in rendering and enforcing justice, that it is a lethal weapon in the war for the freedoms and liberties the unalienable rights of the People. Private Matter The Commercial Affidavit Process places the full power of justice back in the hands of the common man. It cannot be overstated that the whole Commercial Affidavit Process is not dependent on the court system. It functions quite well on its own outside the current legal system. The Commercial Affidavit Process is outside the jurisdiction of any equity court It needs to be thoroughly understood that because it is driven by SWORN TRUTH, the Commercial Affidavit Process is outside the jurisdiction of any equity court. It is a private contract matter. Should an attempt be made to involve an equity court it would result in a trespass against the Affiants rights: those interfering individuals, who were unlawfully involved, would themselves become one of the accused. An equity court has no jurisdiction whatsoever, for the CAP is strictly a non-judicial or pre-judicial process between individuals and is private. This alone presents a very real dilemma for those who are accustomed to using the legal system to work wrongs
52
and trespass against others with seeming impunity. They cant hide behind a legal system that only dispenses justice to those who can afford to play the game. Those who are used to shielding themselves under "sovereign immunity" protections, hiding behind legions of attorneys and judges, and using other "legal tricks" now have none of this protection. Queen Elizabeth II is hiding under Sovereign Immunity. Moai Crown is a Sovereign Monarch versus Queen Elizabeth II Sovereign Monarch. Moai contests the Queens Authority from Moai God. NO judge, court, law, or government can invalidate these commercial processes No third party can invalidate someones affidavit of truth, a complaint or a lien based thereon. A judge CANNOT interfere with, tamper with, or in any way modify testimony without disintegrating the truth-seeking process of his profession, destroying the very fabric of his own occupation and abrogating our Moai Crown Constitution which was established to protect Gods Truth. For a judge to interfere with testimony is to commit professional suicide and to invite countless civil and criminal repercussions. ANYONE who tampers with testimony is a threat to the peace and security of society, violating its laws and acting as its enemy and is therefore justifiably subject to the appropriate penalties. The Commercial Affidavit Process is by its very nature private, and strictly between parties of interest, only. It is unequivocally non-judicial. Sworn Truth The foundation of the law, commerce and the whole legal system consists in telling the truth ("I solemnly swear to tell the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the Truth so help me God, either by testimony, deposition or by affidavit. Every honorable judge requires those who appear before him to be sworn to tell the truth compelled by the high principles of his profession to protect seek out the truth. Commercial Affidavit A Commercial Affidavit is an Affidavit of Truth. It is the sworn testimony of the Affiant who solemnly swears that the facts contained therein are true, correct and certain. Every claim made in the Affidavit is backed up by documentary evidence that is provable without any contrivance. Meeting the Demands If (as is usually the case) the Accused recognizes the charges are true and/or decides (correctly) that the wisest thing to do is meet the demands rather than face the staggering punitive damages. Which accompany the issuance of the Criminal Complaint, the Accused has the option of simply meeting the demands for redress as required by or negotiated with the Claimant. If the Accused has the good sense to meet the demands of the Claimant, then the wrongs have been satisfactorily redressed; and that is the end of the issue: all charges are resolved; the Commercial Affidavit Process is closed. Anyone is free to use the CAP system; but it is a two-edged sword: it cuts both ways! Anyone who undertakes it MUST follow the maxim, "Be honest with yourself," because, especially under the Commercial Affidavit Process, "Truth will out!" Consequently it is extremely important to ensure that everything in the affidavit is true and unrebut-able.
53
Acquiescence When one is the Accused in a commercial Affidavit process properly (truthfully) done, by far THE WISEST COURSE IS TO REDRESS THE CLAIMANT AS DEMANDED whatever must be done to accomplish it. Should the Accused be misguided into choosing ANY response other than acquiescence, the Criminal Complaint will issue accompanied by the Commercial Lien based on the Complaints ledger of charges, counts, redresses demanded. And ADDING (1) PUNITIVE DAMAGES and (2) INCARCERATION as provided in the applicable Government and/or State criminal codes. Although it is extremely unlikely in the face of a properly done affidavit, should the Accused believe that Affiants charges are somehow in error, he or She may (DURING THE GRACE PERIOD ONLY) rebut any such charge. However, (1) such response will NOT avoid issuance of the Trial Criminal Complaint; (2) the Commercial Lien will still issue for any charges not rebutted AND (3) a second Commercial Lien will issue for any rebutted charges about which the Common Law Jury thereby convened remains un-persuaded! Hence REBUTTAL (unless 100% successful which is highly unlikely) WILL NOT AVOID the horrendous PUNITIVE DAMAGES and INCARCERATION provided by law. Rebuttal The sworn Affidavit will stand as truth if not timely rebutted by Accused. In the instant case, seven (7) days and (21) 21 days The only one who can rebut a Commercial Affidavit is the Accused who alone, by his own affidavit, must speak for himself and only for himself. If the Accused uses someone else to speak for him, the third party must speak for and in behalf of the Accused as if he were the Accused; and the Accused still stands completely liable as if he himself were speaking. If however, the third party is identified as separated from the Accused, he also becomes a co-party with the Accused as an accomplice, thus a co-conspirator having no immunity whatsoever. Every charge or claim contained in the Claimants Affidavit must be rebutted point-for-point by the Accused. The Accusers rebuttal must be done in the form of an Affidavit of Truth. That means it must be SWORN TESTIMONY and must be signed by at least two witnesses. The Accused/Affiant must swear to the truth, the correctness and the certainty of his or her rebuttals within that affidavit, thereby assuming complete liability for the statements contained in it and must be prepared to prove his or her statements, preferably with documentation that is unimpeachable. Failure to follow the correct process of rebutting the charges or ANY ATTEMPT TO PRESENT REBUTTAL EVIDENCE THAT IS NOT SWORN AS BOTH TRUE and "THE WHOLE TRUTH" INVALIDATES such response as if no evidence or rebuttal was given at all. SUCH FAILURE IS FATAL TO THE DEFENSE! If a proper rebuttal is offered, any of several conclusions may result: 1. If any or all charges are rebutted, those charges will (at Claimants discretion) be resolved as described under "RESOLUTION BY JURY." 2. Any charges not rebutted or redressed will result in a DEFAULT CONVICTION for those charges and the
54
issuance of a "non-trial" criminal complaint, which will be covered under "CRIMINAL LIABILITY." Resolution by Jury The Claimant may accept or reject Accusers rebuttal of any charge, point-for-point. Claimants acceptance of the rebuttal of any point resolves that point is at the discretion of the Claimant. ALL UNACCEPTED POINTS may be either resolved by another affidavit on those points, repeating the process. A common-law Court jury resolves fallout of all of the Affidavits. If and when the jury system is used, the Claimant will draft the Criminal Complaint, subpoena a jury, and the process will move to a full-blown, common-law criminal trial. If the matter goes to a common-law criminal trial, the trial will be held under the rules of common law. These rules are significantly different from those in an equity court proceeding. In common-law trials, technical rules are virtually non-existent. Like its name, the rules of common-law trials are from common sense. The procedure is very simple and straightforward. Its designed to arrive at the true facts, assess guilt and render a just verdict without undue delays or fancy maneuvering, thus eliminating delays intended to forestall or get the Accused acquitted on some technicality. The jury is the real boss. It decides what is relevant and what is not. The jurors hear what they want to hear and exclude what they feel is not relevant. The Claimant or his appointee becomes the prosecutor, and the Accused or his appointee becomes the defense attorney. The parties of interest (the Claimant and the Accused) may have anyone they want as counsel, professional or not. The risk faced by the Accused is very real. A common-law court only recognizes common law, and it applies common-law decisions. Equity court decisions and rules that conflict with the common law is without standing in common-law proceedings. In the Commercial Affidavit Process, the claimants are almost always sovereign Citizens. As such they have legal standing at common law. The Accused are usually "subject citizens" being charged with crimes against "sovereign Citizens." Typically the acts committed have been done under colorable law with colorable authority or colorable jurisdiction. In which case is patently unconstitutional and therefore void, leaving the Accused defenseless: so a second Commercial Lien will issue for those redresses and punitive damages of which the jury has not exonerated the Accused. Due Process commercial grace In order to meet the demands of due process, the parties must have reasonable time to express their versions of the controversy ("In order for a matter to be resolved, it must be expressed.") Therefore a grace period must be allowed, commonly referred to as "commercial grace." Many court jurisdictions allow only 20 days, which may be sufficient; but the Claimant in his discretion believes that 30 days is more reasonable. At the Claimants discretion, even more time may be granted without notice; HOWEVER, that does not relieve the defense of the obligation to respond within the time of commercial grace given default falls by declaration in thirty (30) days. Losing by Default How important is it to TIMELY answer the accusations made in a Sworn Affidavit of Truth? IT IS VITALLY
55
IMPORTANT! If the Accused failed to properly and timely answer, he stands to lose all and will have foreclosed to himself any future possibility of redressing or rebutting those charges. The primary objective is to insure justice quickly and with a minimum of difficulty. Failure to timely answer is fatal to the outcome. It is equivalent to abandoning the battlefield and causes loss by default ("While the battle continues, he who first leaves the field or refuses to contend loses by default.") The Accused, having started the contest by violating and trespassing upon the Affiants rights, cannot with impunity leave the contest. The victory and the spoils go to him who stays and is the last to leave the battle. The loser loses and in so doing, grants the spoils to the victor. There is no recovery for the loser; notwithstanding any new battle, which may ensue, the loss still stands; it cant be set aside. Consequently, the Accused failure to redress or rebut charges contained in a Commercial Affidavit is tantamount to abandoning the battlefield: thus losing by default. Some in government, by trying to hide behind some rule or procedure that requires Claimants to follow some predetermined course or time limit, commit a fatal error! They are usually relying on some statute or other inferior level of protection, which might apply to those who are subject to such jurisdiction, but not to sovereign Citizens. When "estoppel by acquiescence" caused by failure to timely answer enters the picture, as it surely will in this setting, the result has a far-reaching impact on the future of each Accused. Criminal Liability Responding to the Commercial Affidavit is critically important: the Accused is usually being charged with very serious crimes that carry very heavy, punitive penalties. The law has always viewed trespassing upon unalienable rights as being an offense so serious that it is beyond satisfaction merely by payment of the approximate money damages demanded. The Affidavit is a commercial complaint, but it is not yet a "criminal" complaint. The main distinction is that by resolving the charges during the Affidavit stage, the Accused can get off by simply redressing the grievances as specified in the Affidavit or as mutually negotiated. If the Accused recognizes his or her errors and wants to redress the Claimant but does not have the ability to do so within the time limit, the Accused may contact the Claimant and express that desire with a written statement to that effect. Then arrangements can be made to stop any further action. If some such arrangements are not made, then CRIMINAL COMPLAINT issues are then adding PUNITIVE DAMAGES and JAIL TIME! The Criminal Complaint is in reality a ledger in which those details, which were omitted in the Affidavit, are (now) spelled out. It lists the causes of action, the number of counts, redresses demanded and the MASSIVE CIVIL PENALTIES (which occur when unalienable rights are violated), thus compounding the problems for the Accused: now, on top of the redresses being demanded, massive PUNITIVE DAMAGES are added as well! Normally this increases the cost to the Accused by a factor of at least a hundred if not a thousand fold. The effects of the criminal complaint invariably destroy all prospects for the future of the Accused! An S.E.C. Security (NZ Securities and Exchange Commission)
56
When the Commercial Affidavit has matured, (after 21 days) it is evidence of a debt and/or obligations. In order for it to be classed as a security, it must carry the NZ Securities and Exchange Commission (S.E.C.) TRACER FLAG on it from the very beginning. As a security it must conform to the rules governing securities and must be identified and monitored as such from the beginning. A Ledger Identifying the Penalties Since the Criminal Complaint is in reality a ledger in which the causes of action and the number of counts are listed and the civil penalties (punitive damages) determined, the criminal complaint acts as a punishment tool for wrongdoers who will not repent. Should the Accused be so foolish as to ALLOW the Criminal Compliant to be activated (i.e., fail to answer by redressment or rebuttal) the war is over. All that remains is collecting the spoils of battle. The Accused has lost and lost in a very big way. In all probability the Accused will never recover from the consequences. This is true is because THE "TRIAL" WAS GOING ON DURING THE 21 DAYS. To compare the Commercial Affidavit Process to a conventional trial would look like this: The Commercial Affidavit presents the prosecutors case in one fell swoop. The moment the Accused is served, the defense process begins. THE ACCUSED THEN HAS 21 DAYS TO MAKE A CASE. IF during that time the Accused make no defense or redress of the charges, he or she then stands convicted by default! The "trial" is now over. The Criminal Complaint is only a formality to calculate the punitive damages against the Accused, which thus have been awarded to the Claimant. Consensual Default against all the assets of the Accused Accompanying the Criminal Complaint is the COMMERCIAL LIEN, which issued by CONSENSUAL DEFAULT against all the assets of the Accused. This effectively gives the Claimant lien rights against all of the property of the Accused. Such a lien may be filed in the county recorders office; however, this filing is not a necessity, but a convenience. Any common law commercial lien will stand by law for one hundred years or until the damages have been collected. In most cases that means practically forever because the Accused does not, and probably never will have enough property to satisfy the damages thus assessed. Legal enforcement, Police and Debt Collectors Now the full power of the legal enforcement system can be brought to bear to collect the damages owed by the Accused. The Police, Peace Officers, Military, Wardens, Debt Collectors are empowered to seize paychecks, cars, and homes: anything and everything. Loss of Government Employment The Accused is in fact a convicted felon: un-bond-able by any insurance company, subject by law to immediate termination if employed by the government and forever barred from holding public office. Jail, Felony, Misprision The Criminal Complaint is turned over to the appropriate Prosecuting Attorney, who must institute a sentencing
57
hearing wherein a judge will impose the incarceration (jail-time) prescribed in the appropriate criminal codes for the offenses of which the Accused stands convicted. Should any such authority fail to prosecute sentencing against the convicted party, the mildest charge then faced by such authority is Felony Misprision; but such Prosecuting Attorney could also be charged with conspiracy to aid and abet the convicted party in commission of the same offenses. Under our current political situation, where the enemies of the People often occupy positions of power and authority and those same people can prevent or slow the wheels of justice. There are still many ways to publish the convictions and misdeeds of parties so convicted that can be even more humiliating to the convicted than the normal methods of publishing the results of their conviction. Summary of unalienable rights of a Sovereign Citizen The fundamental purpose, and one of the major objectives of the Commercial Affidavit Process is to educate wrongdoers to the fact they have abused the unalienable rights of a sovereign Citizen and cannot get away with it. To give them an opportunity to repent and undo the wrongs they have done (commercial grace). Unlike the typical criminal trial where the Accused no longer has the option of simply redressing the wrongs he or she has done, the Commercial Affidavit Process DOES give the Accused that option! Further, the CAP is designed to educate wrongdoers that the conspirators in the war against the People are using them. Thus they may see for themselves what is really going on, decide which side they choose to serve. MOAI Crown or Queen Elizabeth II Crown Role of the Courts and honorable judges do nothing to tamper with that truth, destroying the fabric of his own legal occupation An affidavit is someones solemn expression of truth. The foundation of the law, commerce, and the whole legal system consists of telling the truth ("I swear to tell the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth"), either by testimony, deposition, and/or by affidavit. Every honorable judge requires those who appear before him to be sworn to tell the truth, and is compelled by the high principles of his profession. To protect truth and do nothing to tamper with that truth, either directly or indirectly, either in person or by proxy, or by subornation of an AFFIANT or other person. A judge CANNOT interfere with, tamper with, or in any way modify testimony without disintegrating the truthseeking process in his sacred profession and destroying the fabric of his own occupation. To do so abrogates the First Amendment, and Moai Gods Law which was established to protect truth. It is committing professional suicide, as well as inviting countless civil and criminal repercussions. ANY judge, who tampers with testimony, deposition, or affidavit, is a threat to the Commercial Peace and Dignity of the County, State, of Australia, Canada Britain and New Zealand and Pacific Islands. Thereby violating the laws of all those political subdivisions and acting in the nature of a foreign enemy agent (A MIXED WAR), justifiably subject to penalties of TREASON, PM John Key committed. WHOEVER acts against Commercial Affidavits without executing the necessary Commercial Paperwork under
58
affidavit is subject to being charged criminally. Said charges begin with FRAUD, which is gaining at the expense of the loss of another using trickery or deception, and the charges expand from there to include all those violations that extend to and are a natural outgrowth of such fraud. Commercial processes are fundamentally non-judicial and pre-judicial NO judge, court, law, or government can invalidate these commercial processes; i.e., an affidavit or a lien or complaint based thereon, because no third party can invalidate someones affidavit of truth. To act against such affidavit is to create a situation and or enhance the condition of A MIXED WAR. No one can rebut an AFFIANT except a party (e.g., a lien debtor) who alone, by his own affidavit, must speak for himself if challenged. Only someone himself knows his truth and has the right and responsibility to assert it. MIXED WAR acting for undisclosed foreign agents or governments acts of TREASON and secret war against the people. The MIXED WAR situation and or condition is where those in authority have violated their oaths of office, violated fundamental law they took an oath to uphold and protect. Violated the codes, statutes and regulations that govern them thereby they disregarded the peace and safety of the community by their actions, acting for undisclosed foreign agents or governments, against those whom they swore to protect [see Blacks Law Dictionary on War]. Simply, an act or acts of TREASON in a secret war against the people. Notes on the Above Article What you have read gives you the theoretical foundation for most of this manual. Practically, there are difficulties with the strategy described above. Conducting a common-law criminal trial is not easy, as the author noted. The court system has, for practical purposes, extinguished that option. Thus, territorial gangsters are often shielded from criminal prosecution. However, the one aspect of the strategy that can still be effective is Commercial Liens. As of this writing, seems, no judge can extinguish such a lien if its properly executed. Constitutions as Enforceable Contracts The Commercial Lien Strategy depends upon one "maxim" as its linchpin: the idea of a constitution as a specific performance contract between a governing official and the people in a particular jurisdiction. Some writers (such as Lysander Spooner) have denounced the U.S. Constitution as a fraud, on the grounds that it is not an enforceable contract (see Report #TL07: The Constitution of No Authority available at this web-site). Commercial Lien Strategy By contrast, holds that constitutions are enforceable contracts. Instruments of contract, and OATHS OF OFFICE. The Commercial Lien Strategy assumes that, when an official signs an oath, he/she signs a contract to exercise the powers of office within the limitations of the constitution and the laws. On paper, there are sanctions against officials who violate their oaths. "Whoever, having taken an oath before a competent tribunal, officer, or person, in any case in which a law of
59
Canada, Australia, Britain, New Zealand and Pacific Islands authorizes an oath to be administered. Willfully and contrary to such oath states or subscribes to any material matter which he does not believe to be true, is guilty of perjury and shall be fined no more than $2,000.00 or imprisoned not more than five years or both." 18 U.S.C. 1621 In practice, it is very difficult to prosecute a malfeasant public official. However, such officials may be exposed to great personal, commercial liability for violating their oaths of office. Apparently, many government officials realize this. Alfred Adask, editor/publisher of The AntiShyster, writes: "A friend of mine recently asked the [Texas] Secretary of State for copies of Governors and AGs oaths, but received no response for nearly two months. Finally, he received a copy of the AG [Dan] Moraless oath which was dated January, 1991, but was not file stamped until March 26, 1993 Very suspicious. Governor [Anne] Richards oath is yet to be found by the Secretary of State, Likewise suspicious. "It appears possible (probable?) That the Governor and AG had not taken their oaths of office for two years after they were elected. If so, they were (are?) probably in office illegally. It would follow then, that anything theyd done or signed in an official capacity in the last two years might also be unlawful and without legal merit. New Zealand Governor General Anand Satyanad, Jerry Mateparae Andrews Queen Elizabeth II in TREASON against MOAI "The potential for legal havoc is huge in New Zealand is a Crown TREASON Problem. Laws signed by the Governor Generals in the last two years is unlawful; The entire Executive branch of New Zealand State Government is flawed, operating illegally without lawful authority to enforce any law or regulation; innumerable criminal convictions shall be applied to them. All civil court cases prosecuted by Attorney General Chris Finlayson and the entire Queens office (derives its authority from the Queens oath) is unlawful Treason is Fraud. Moai Crown Confederation states that the Acts of New Zealand Parliament are Fraud and Corrupted for their Business only Debtor Bill of Indictment Commercial Lien Stolen Property Land Wealth Gold Money Seizure Arrest Warrant "Its virtually impossible for the courts to rule that all official acts of Parliament for the last two years are unlawful. But whether those official acts are bogus or not, there is infinitely important questions to investigate the Queens Governments Monarchy Sovereignty: "Why werent the oaths of the Governor General and Attorney General of New Zealand investigated when the Queen relinquished her Sovereignty to the European Union Parliament. And changed her Style Title from Her Majesty the Queen in Right of New Zealand to Queen Elizabeth II Supreme Governor of the Church of England. Which is Moai Crown Confederation Legal Land Owners of New Zealand Country Complaint Lien Debtor Bill of Indictment Arrest Warrant. Served on the Fraud Corrupted Queen of England and her Queen Elizabeth II Crown Private Business Buckingham Palace and Her Majesty the Queen in Right of New Zealand and her Fraud Crown Corporate Sole Agents. Attorney General Christopher Finlayson and Governor General Jerry Mateparae (Andrews) The two most important officials in the Executive branch of our NZ State Government on file at Prime Minister John Keys office?
60
"Why the secret agenda of the Queen of England and her Honorable s included in the new Voting arrangement that is offensive Treason? "I dont think so. I think the oaths to Queen Elizabeth II dont exist in real, are corrupted politics committing FRAUD [Emphasis added] NZ Government officials swore their oath s to Queen Elizabeth II Supreme Governor of the Church of England who cannot simply at the whim cut her old Sovereignty off and start a new Sovereignty of New Zealand in a new Style of Title. Queen Elizabeth II Supreme Governor of the Church of England. This Alien Corporate Person named ELIZABETH WINDSOR (aka) Queen Elizabeth II is our Moai Crown LIEN CLAIM BILL CHARGED DEBTOR INDICTMENT ARREST WARRANT complaint that is Recorded from 2009 in AFFIDAVITS of her changing Roles to one of a Corrupted Church of England and catholic Church of VATICAN CITY! The Government of New Zealand and its QUEEN ELIZABETH II with her Representative Governor General ANAND SATYANAD, was sacked off our MOAI CONFEDERATION SOVEREIGNS Land. By the MOAI CROWN Maori State Government PM Sue Nikora and I was the Customary Legal Advocate HOANI KAHAKI WANOA who issued the PROCLAIMATIONS severing QUEEN ELIZABETH II MONARCHY SOVEREIGN RULER. With my MOAI WANOA UETAHA ROYAL FAMILY HAPU SOVEREIGN MONARCHY SUPREME TITLE in front of the TE TII MARAE TAUMATA and Maori Government Confederation CONGRESS The Government PM John Key instructed the Governor General Jerry Mateparae to open up their New Zealand Parliament against our Moai Crown Confederation Landlords Orders Proclamations, which amounts to GRAND TREASON. John Key did this Unlawful Act in an attempt to cover their butts from being sued (or lien-ed. on) for not upholding and defending their illegal oath, constitution? Bonding of Government Officials (He becomes personally liable ("lien-able") for any illegal act he commits in office) Some pro se litigants postulate the requirement that government officials be "bonded." As far as anyone knows, this theory has not been tested in court. Nonetheless, some readers of this manual may wish to research this topic further. Therefore, what follows is a brief exposition of the theory. The "bonding" theory states that most elected officials and government administrators (perhaps even lawyers), are legally required to be "bonded." That is, they must purchase a "performance bond" (a kind of insurance policy) which guarantees that the official will perform the duties required by his office. In the event the government official fails to perform his duties, any party injured by this breach of contract can recover the cost of his damages from the bonding company. According to these pro se litigants, despite the legal requirement that government officials be bonded, many, perhaps most are not. Therefore, the "bonding requirement" strategy is based on first determining if a given official is legally required to be bonded. Then, if he is bonded and evidence can be shown to the bonding company that he is failing to meet the performance requirements of his bond the bonding company may revoke the bond or raise his premium, which should help "encourage" the wayward official to obey the law. Further, if the bond is required by law in order to hold a particular office, once that bond is lost, its possible that the office must also be surrendered.
61
If the official is not bonded, then the lien process includes notifying the government official of this legal deficiency. If he does not correct the deficiency (purchase a performance bond) within 90 days, then anyone damaged by his actions can file a commercial lien on the government official for all of his personal property. Also (according to this theory) a government officials bond is dependent upon his legal immunity, and that immunity is to some extent based on having a legal Oath of Office on file (usually with the Secretary of State). If his Oath of Office is insufficient to meet the Constitutional or statutory requirements, he may lose his immunity and his bond. If he loses his bond, he becomes personally liable ("lien-able") for any illegal act he commits in office. Chapter 3 - Basic Concepts of Liens Lien Definition "Lien. A claim, encumbrance, or charge on property for payment of some debt, obligation or duty. Qualified right of property which a creditor has in or over specific property of his debtor, as security for the debt or charge or for performance of some act." Blacks Law Dictionary, 6th Ed., p. 922 [emphasis added] A lien is a public declaration of commercial debt and/or obligation. "Debt" usually refers to money or property. "Obligation" usually refers to the fulfillment of specific performance. Examples include the fulfillment of oath of public office or the provision of the tax-financed due process, as in the provision of a jury trial instead of a summary process. Examples of liens include mortgages and automobile loans. In both instances, the possessor has the right to use the property. However, he may not sell or otherwise alienate the property without satisfying the lien first. Any attempt to evade the lien is known as pound-breach, which is a felony in most jurisdictions. An individual who has no debt, no need to borrow money and does not contemplate selling or refinancing his house or car can probably live with a lien for a long time. However, most people (especially most government officials!) do not fall into that category. Therefore, even though a Commercial Lien does not cause outright forfeiture of property, it can still cause significant hardship. Even more vexing to the lien debtor is the fact that the lien is not causing him any actual damages. Rather, it prevents him from doing that which he may want to do. Therefore, suing the lien claimant for damages is not easy, provided that the lien has been properly executed. Types Of Liens Common Law Liens are non-commercial "Lis Pendens" Liens that must be upheld by judicial action in a court before claims to assets can be executed. Common law liens are usually used more in a defensive way to shield and protect assets, rather than an offensive way to lay claim to assets. (See further discussion under Comparisons). Equity Liens arise from an equity court or administrative court. Statutory Liens are established by the statutory laws of the state
62
Mortgage Liens are created by contract between borrowers and lenders, with the asset of the borrower pledged as collateral to the lender. Mechanics Liens are typically used by repair service providers as a claim on an item repaired, to ensure payment for repair services rendered. The name originated from when an auto mechanic repairs a car and the owner fails to pay for the repair. Then the mechanic can file a lien on the car. Commercial Liens, also known as contract liens, are true bills in commerce publicly declared. A true bill in commerce always contains, and is characterized by, a one-to-one correspondence between an item or service purchased and a debt owed. This commercial relationship is what is known as "just compensation" (5th Amendment, U.S. Constitution). A normal true bill in commerce is private, whereas a commercial lien is publicly declared, using means such as media advertising and/or filing at the County Recorder. When it is uncontested by a categorical point-by-point rebuttal of the affidavits, it is considered an account receivable security (15 U.S.C.) Tax liens are classified as commercial liens In general, commercial liens (e.g., mechanics and workmens liens) take seniority over common-law liens, which, in turn, take precedence over mortgage liens. Tax liens are classified as commercial liens, which is why they are so troublesome. Comparisons Common Law liens are well known in the Sovereign community for asset protection. They are considered noncommercial, because they do not contain a declaration of one-to-one correspondence between an item or service purchased and the debt owed. Thus, they dont represent true bills in commerce. Because of that defect, a court of common law must adjudicate a non-commercial lien before the other party can claim the asset. And is therefore known as a Lis Pendens Lien. The commercial value of a Lis Pendens Lien rests upon the outcome of the pending litigation. Hence it is a security, but is not an account receivable until it is adjudicated as such. Lis Pendens Lien is a security for asset protection, pending litigation So, common law liens are normally used as defensive shields, in that by placing it on ones own asset to be protected, no other party can legally get access to the asset without first challenging the lien in court. Thats why it is called a Lis Pendens Lien. The lien might be filed at a county recorder and never be challenged in court, because parties who have no just and legal right to the property will usually avoid the risk of failing to prove the claim in court. It is considered asset protection, since it is difficult or impossible for anyone to get at the equity in an asset if a Lis Pendens Lien of sufficient size has senior position. A commercial lien, by contrast, is offensive in nature, in that it declares a legal right to someone elses asset as a debt owed as a one-to-one correspondence with an asset that was given. It is not a Lis Pendens Lien, because the exact value is already specifically determined, consistent with the laws of commerce. It is a true bill in commerce. Although a commercial lien can be challenged by a common law court or by a 7th Amendment jury
63
trial, it does not require a court process or a court judgment for its establishment, validity, or effectiveness. A summary process is too vulnerable to bribery, kickbacks, and fraud of process A commercial lien may not be removed by anyone except the lien claimant, or a properly convened, properly conducted jury trial (due process). A summary process may not remove it. Common citizens with a common law lien so powerful it can give a common person an enormous amount of legal "leverage" Like the common law lien, common citizens, without the aid or expense of a lawyer, and without the approval or interference of the courts can file the commercial lien. You do the necessary research, you fill out the lien, you have it notarized, and you file it with your County Clerk. Its simple, inexpensive, and so powerful it can give a common person an enormous amount of legal "leverage" that is largely beyond the reach of the courts. (In some counties among the thousands of counties in the U.S., you may find recalcitrant clerks who will refuse to file your properly executed documents. While such clerks are violating their sworn public duty to record and make a matter of public record your properly executed documents, as a practical matter suing a recalcitrant country clerk usually will be less effective than various alternatives. Your best bet is probably: Be low profile in recording any properly executed good-faith documents. Dont particularly discuss the contents of the documents youre filing with the clerk. Youre not trying to hide anything after all, youre making a matter of public record various statements you are affirming the truth of, in good faith. But attracting undue attention may impede the progress of anything you may wish to make a matter of public record. (2) If you do run into a recalcitrant clerk who doesnt like what youre doing, simply try another county, or try the same county on a different occasion. This fits very well with our strategy of "creating your own creative alternative" when confronted with certain bureaucratic obstacles. (3) You could as a different alternative try using appropriate media publications to make your documents a matter of public record (by "publishing the document"). Youll need to research the particulars of how to do this in your area, if you use this option. But finding a county clerk that does their job routinely and properly is probably lower-profile.) Unlike the common law lien (used to defend property you possess), a commercial lien is "offensive" in nature since it enables you to "attack," threaten, or seize someone elses property, which you do not possess. The fundamental difference between commercial and common law liens centers on the issue of possession. In many states, such as Oklahoma, a common law lien can only be filed against property which you lawfully possess; this was decided in the Oklahoma Supreme Court case Williamson v. Winningham, 186 P.2d 644. Check the laws in your own state. A commercial lien, by contrast, can be filed against the property of anyone who owes you a financial debt or duty of performance, regardless of whether you possess their property or not.
64
Liens vs. Levies "Levy A seizure. The obtaining of money by legal process through seizure and sale of property; the raising of the money for which an execution has been issued. "The process whereby a sheriff or other state official empowered by writ or other judicial directive actually seizes, or otherwise brings under her control, a judgment debtors property which is taken to secure or satisfy judgment." Blacks Law Dictionary, 6th Ed., p. 907 A levy is the outright seizure of a property in satisfaction of a debt or obligation. A lien, on the other hand, is an encumbrance on property. Although the two often accompany one another in judicial or commercial actions, they are not the same things. Chapter 4 - Procedures and Implementation Research First, obviously read everything in this manual and anything else on the subject you can find. While this manual provides all the most important basic information, it does not presume to possibly cover comprehensively everything you would ever need to know on commercial liens. New information is coming out every day, and you may discover additional information from your own research and experience. Further, because Moai Crown is in this business of giving Customary Advocacy legal advice, even this manual can be relied upon as Moai Gods Law of the Monarch Sovereigns Truth. This is information we believe to be accurate, and it is your responsibility to confirm that it complies with laws in your state, to protect you, by joining Moai Confederation over the world. Members of Moai Confederation It is assumed that you will already have specific purpose in mind, for the use of Moai Crown Liens. You either has had property taken by officials in government-related agencies, you would like returned, or their specific actions or failure to fulfill their obligations in office has otherwise damaged you. Or, you have some large ideological goal you would like fulfilled for the benefit of society at large. Like Mr. Marshs lien against the U.S. Government. Whatever the case, much of the language of the documents to be used will have to be composed by us as members of Moai Confederation, to articulate the necessary factors for the fulfillment of your chosen purpose. Notice and Demand The first document we are creating is the "Notice and Demand." It is imperative that this step is included before filing the lien; otherwise, if this step is skipped, you could be prosecuted, convicted, fined, and jailed for failure to follow legal due process. Properly following due process is part of your actions being done in good faith. After an errant official has been served a Notice and Demand, he must be given a lawfully adequate period of time (check your local jurisdictions requirements) to correct his error or breach of contract. Usually this is anywhere from 3 to 21 days. For example, there was a Notice and Demand reportedly served by Charles Gray (a pro se) to Judge Joel Feldman
65
in Georgia (see Appendix B.1). In this Notice, Mr. Gray alleges that Judge Feldman had broken various laws in the process of taking of some of Mr. Grays property to repay back taxes to the IRS. Although you can use ideas from Mr. Grays Notice and Demand, obviously your own shall be custom designed by Moai Crown for your own purpose as a Moai Confederation world member. Yet there are certain common elements that should always characterize it: 1. It should be in the form of an Affidavit, and it should address the individual(s) personally. 2. The Notice should be as concise as possible, preferably avoiding religion or morality. It should focus on applicable law, and contain appropriate citations of law, if possible, to support what is being claimed. 3. It must quote the legal amount of time given for the recipient to fulfill the demand, and what will happen if the demand is not satisfied within that time. 4. It should give the recipient a certain period of time in which to rebut the claims made therein. 5. Finally, it should be hand-delivered or sent certified mail, return receipt requested. Notice of Default If the individual does not respond to or rebut your Notice and Demand (see Appendix B.1), you should then send a Notice of Default, stating that (1) the recipient has acquiesced to your claims by default, and that (2) payment or satisfaction is expected. Filing this Notice of Default (see Appendix B.2) with the County Recorder or Clerk of Court where the lien debtor has property creates a public, legal record in support of your subsequent lien. In the case of 61 Cook Street Property include this in the Notice Commercial Lien If, after the lawful period passes without correction, only then can a Commercial Lien be served to the offending official or sent Certified Mail, Return Receipt Requested, and also filed at the courthouse(s) for the county (ies) in which the offender has property. The lien must be accompanied by (or must contain) a Commercial Affidavit, containing a ledger of damages suffered. The lien must also cite the law(s), action(s) or obligation(s) that gave rise to the damages. Models of both documents are listed in Appendix B. Lawsuits and Criminal Complaints Some pro se litigants will first file a lawsuit (Title 42 U.S. Code 1983) or a criminal complaint before filing a commercial lien. This step is included to show a "good faith" attempt to obtain justice according to normal legal
66
procedures. After the courts refuse to consider the litigants legal complaints (which are usually the case), the litigant declares a state of "Mixed War," and files the commercial lien. An example of a Criminal Complaint is included in Appendix B.4. If you use it, you must change the document to suit your particular situation. There is no "fill-in-the-blanks" magic here! Chapter 5 - Mistakes and Pitfalls to Avoid Defective Legal Form and Procedure When filing any lien, it is important to follow the legal forms and procedures of your state or locality. Study the statutes for the locality in which you are filing, and follow those forms and procedures religiously. Failure to do so can have serious consequences. First, you may be civilly liable for "slander of title." In some jurisdictions (notably Louisiana) this is called "Jactitation," and a suit to remove the "cloud of title" and recover damages is known as an "action of jactitation." Even worse, in many jurisdictions, someone who files liens in bad faith, or who uses defective forms or procedures, can be convicted of "felony slander of title." An example of the possible repercussions is shown in the following newspaper article: Headline on March 3, 1993, front page of the San Luis Obispo Telegram Tribune: "Bogus Lien Filer Convicted." "When Sheriff Williams tried to refinance his home a routine check of county records showed someone had placed a $100,000 lien on the home. The lien was filed by Steven K. Jones, whom Sheriff Williams had never seen, until they met in court on the issue of the lien. "Jones defended himself without a lawyer against charges he filed the bogus liens against property owned by Sheriff Williams and six others who were involved in the sale of his truck. Conducted by the Sheriffs Department to collect a portion of the $22,000 in back taxes the Franchise Tax Board says Jones owes. "Liens were also placed on property owned by the towing service operator who seized the truck and on the man who bought the truck at the tax auction. Jones later placed that man under citizens arrest for theft of this truck. "Jones is one of what law enforcement authorities believe is a loosely affiliated group of county residents who call themselves common law citizens people who take extraordinary steps to disavow government control in their lives. Jones has a notarized document renouncing his citizenship has taken steps to void his birth certificate relinquished his drivers license and social security number and closed his bank account because the bank card, he believes, gives the bank power of attorney. "Joness two sons, 13 and 12, sat with his wife throughout the week-long trial. They are taught at home and dont attend school. I have two small children who I want to see grow up and not be slaves to the government, he told the jury.
67
"But the prosecuting attorney said Jones went too far when he filed official looking documents [the liens] for a $17 filing fee. According to the prosecutor, the documents were just garbage. "What Jones did is hardly a prank. Liens are a ticking time bomb, said one expert on real estate law. The victim doesnt even know it exists. Once a lien is recorded, it remains on the books forever. Having a lien nullified even one thats fraudulent requires a court order. That process likely involves hiring an attorney and could take anywhere from months to years. "A jury convicted Jones on two felony charges after deliberating less than a hour. The maximum punishment is three years in prison on each count and a $75,000 fine. "Outside the courtroom, Jones admitted that recording the liens was a mistake. He couldnt tell the jury, Jones confided, but he regrets what he did and blames advice from a Sacramento-based anti-tax organization, which he paid $3,200 to join. He used documents supplied by the anti-tax organizations to file the liens." [Emphasis added] Evidently, Jones did not substantiate his liens with a "true bill in commerce," nor did he serve the sheriff, et al, with the proper Notice and Demand (commercial grace). The prosecuting attorney used both of these facts as evidence of bad faith, and easily obtained a conviction. Let that experience be a lesson to others! Dont use this material unless you are very sure you know what youre doing. Any actual results are your own responsibility. The procedures discussed in this manual are not to be used "for fun." Consider them to be "of academic interest only" if youre less than fully sure, in good faith, of what youre doing. You and you alone are fully responsible for any results that might arise from any actual use of these materials. We specifically disclaim any such responsibility. "Hanson-type" or "Nebulous" Liens In the 1970s, a man named Gerald Hanson started filing liens on various government officials whom he regarded as corrupt. According to Hartford Van Dyke, a current exponent of the Commercial Lien Strategy, Hansons liens were "nebulous." Apparently, Hanson did not connect the officials misconduct with any specific monetary damages suffered by him. (In other words, they were not true bills in commerce. Therefore, judges ruled that these liens were Lis Pendens Liens, rendering them subject to equity proceedings. That, of course, defeats the entire purpose of the commercial lien strategy. A lien seems more likely to stand if a specific official violated her/his oath of office, resulting in specific and identifiable damages to you. "Hanson-type" liens and "class action liens" (such as Phil Marshs) stand on a shakier foundation Aiming Too High Many proponents of the Commercial Lien Strategy have filed liens (like Phil Marshs) upon the President of the United States, the Secretary of the Treasury, state governors and the like. Whether or not such liens are legally accurate, they create a credibility problem. First of all, did the President (for example) damage you by his specific
68
actions? If not, your lien has a weak foundation. Second, if you file such a lien, you may temporarily attention of the public official (and some headlines) but you ultimately risk looking like a "crank." Rather than aiming to win "big," you may be more effective filing $10,000 or $100,000 liens on minor officials (like IRS agents) who have less public sympathy, and are easier targets. Judges and sheriffs are more difficult, but not impossible. In the case of a judge or a sheriff, it may be advisable to give more Notices of Demand than you technically have to. This shows "good faith," and gives the other party a chance to correct the fault. Beware of "Exotic" Arguments Another "double-edged sword" is the insertion of books like Silent Weapons for Quiet Wars as evidence for a lien or a suit. The question here is not one of merit, but effectiveness. Can you win with such evidence? The answer is, "it depends." Dr. Gene Schroeder, of the American Agricultural Movement, appealed a case last year, in which he submitted evidence that the Federal courts Admiralty jurisdiction was obtained by a written declaration of war upon the American people, enacted by Congress March 9, 1933 (48 Stat. 1). He states that two Federal judges involved with the case resigned ("retired") shortly after the appeal was over. So, yes, it can work. However, the risk of this approach is obvious. Unless your evidence is very strong, and you (or your lawyer) have superb speaking skills and presentation, you risk looking like a "mental case" if your action ever comes in front of a jury. The key here may not be legal, but psychological. You need to have an accurate measure of your opposition. If your "exotic" evidence is strong, and you can scare off the prosecutor with an "embarrassing issue," then it may be effective. However, if your opponent is psychologically more secure, that may not work. To put it another way, what you can frighten a prosecutor or a judge with is one matter, but what you can convince "twelve people in a jury box" to believe may be quite another! Before you use such evidence (either in a lien or in court) you should take an honest inventory of yourself. Do you have the psychological acumen, the strategic thinking skills and the rational courage (which does not cross the line into recklessness) to effectively use this evidence? If so, well and good. If not, you may wish to use more conservative strategies. "Know yourself, and know your enemy, and in a thousand battles you will never be in peril" Sun-tzu, The Art of War Chapter 6 - Obstacles and Strategies for Overcoming Them Refusal to File Liens There have been instances reported (in California and Ohio, primarily) where county recorders or clerks of court refuse to file Commercial Liens on government officials. Usually, they have been instructed by their (frightened) superiors to do so. One strategy for dealing with this problem (based on the Uniform Commercial Code) is described by David De Reimer as follows: 1. Bring at least two witnesses along to every face-to-face meeting with the clerk, Recorder of Deeds, Sheriff, etc.
69
2. After the meeting, have your witnesses prepare sworn affidavits of whatever they saw and heard the clerk, official, sheriff, say, do, etc. 3. Get a written explanation or reason from clerk who refuses to record your document. 4. As per your state Uniform Commercial Code section 3-505/501, send a "Notice And Demand For Exhibition Or Presentment Without Dishonor" by certified mail to the office that refused to accept your lien, demanding that they exhibit: a) The Statute or Law passed by the Legislature, which authorizes them to condemn the "Public" records for their personal and private use; b) Their personal Bar/Lawyer I.D. Number issued by the State Bar or State Supreme Court which authorizes them to make "Legal Determinations"; and, c) The Statute or Law passed by the Legislature which authorizes them to edit and/or censor documents prior to recording. "Law of Principal and Agent" Give them reasonable time (21 days) to comply with your DEMAND to prove written authority, and then put them ON NOTICE that the "Law of Principal and Agent" specifies that "The Agent is personally liable for acts not authorized by the Principal." As such, unless there are laws granting the clerk the power to refuse to record certain documents, the clerk/agent has no corporate veil of immunity for his refusals and may be personally vulnerable to a lawsuit. 5. If, after the reasonable time has elapsed, and they have failed to produce the written "authority" you Demanded, send a Notice Of Default by certified mail, noticing them that they have defaulted by not answering. In it, provide them with a "right to cure" their Default by recording your original lien (or other documents) without further interference, or suffer the consequences. Allow 10 to 30 days for their response. 6. If they dont respond in the 10 to 30 days, send them via certified mail, a "Notice of Amount Due" for the damage caused by their injury to you (or your Property Rights) by their defalcation, dereliction of duty, default, and unauthorized "Refusal to Record" in a sizable amount ($1,000??). Again, give them reasonable time (30 days) to pay you. Damage caused by their injury 7. After the 30 days reasonable time has passed (plus 4 or 5 days for the mail), send them certified mail a "Final Notice of Amount Due" for the damage caused by their injury"Law of Principal and Agent" to you. Again, give them reasonable time (30 days) to pay you the amount of damages youve demanded. Present copies of the two certified mail Demands for payment to New Zeland Police Commissioner to arrest them seize property
70
"Distraint Warrant" 8. If they dont pay your "Final Notice" Demand in 30 days (plus 4 or 5 days for the mail). Go to the Country Elected Peace Officer (Sheriff), present copies of the two certified mail Demands for payment, sign a "Distress Warrant" or "Distraint Warrant" stating that you have NOT been paid, and have the Sheriff go get your money or sell the clerks assets. Damage due to his injury to you and/or your property rights 9. If the Sheriff refuses to execute your "Distraint Warrant," inform him that you personally will perform his sworn duty FOR HIM, and on his behalf. Inform him, also, that the newspapers will be informed that he has refused to perform his own sworn duty but continues to cash his pay check, and that this constitutes FRAUD by him since he only performs "Selective Enforcement" of the law which is unlawful. Inform him that the resultant publicity may have a negative impact on his chances for running for reelection. And that you may have to sue him in his personal capacity for money damages due to his Dereliction of Duty, Defalcation, Embezzlement of Public Funds, and damage due to his injury to you and/or your property rights. Notice and Demand for Production or Exhibition without Dishonor 10. Send the Sheriff certified mail a "Notice and Demand For Production or Exhibition Without Dishonor" of the Law or statute that authorizes him to: a) Perform "selective enforcement" of the Law b) Accept the Peoples pay and not execute on lawful Warrants c) Personally edit and censor documents, or refuse to perform his duty under his sworn oath. 11. If either the Sheriff or the Recorder of Deeds says that they take their "orders" from some government lawyer, get that in writing. After, and only after, you have the above "Admission and Confession" in writing, leave their office. Then perform the previous certified mail step and add item: d) Provide the Statute or Law passed by the Legislature that authorizes them to relinquish their office over to another (whoever regardless of whether theyre government attorneys or not) while continuing to accept and negotiate (cash) their pay check after having turned over their office to said "other." Once the clerks, sheriffs, etc. realize their potential liability, it is likely that they will do their duty long before you get to step 11. Heres an alternative analysis, which may have a better practical success rate in accomplishing your goal of getting various documents recorded as a matter of public record, in good faith: In some counties among the thousands of counties in the U.S., you may find recalcitrant clerks who will refuse to file your properly executed documents. While such clerks are violating their sworn public duty to record and make a matter of public record your properly executed documents, as a practical matter suing a recalcitrant country clerk usually less effective than various alternatives. Your best bet is probably: (1) be low profile in recording any properly executed good-faith documents. Dont
71
particularly discuss the contents of the documents youre filing with the clerk. Youre not trying to hide anything after all, youre making a matter of public record various statements you are affirming the truth of, in good faith. But attracting undue attention may impede the progress of anything you may wish to make a matter of public record. (2) If you do run into a recalcitrant clerk who doesnt like what youre doing, simply try another county, or try the same county on a different occasion. This fits very well with our strategy of "creating your own creative alternatives" when confronted with certain bureaucratic obstacles. If you try another county, remember that for some types of documents there may be a requirement that property thats a "subject" of the documents may have to be located in the county of recording. (3) You could as a different alternative try using appropriate media publications to make your documents a matter of public record (by "publishing the document"). Youll need to research the particulars of how to do this in your area, if you use this option. But finding a county clerk that does their job routinely and properly is probably lower-profile. Abuse of Judicial Power There have been cases reported of judges who have threatened to jail lienors for "contempt of court" if they do not "voluntarily" lift their liens. In two cases, the judges actually carried out their threat. Such legal coercion on their part is almost certainly unlawful. Nonetheless, some judges will use that tactic, if they think the lienor is vulnerable. To deal with this problem, it is helpful to remember the following: 1. The only reason the judge is making that threat is because he has no lawful means of extinguishing the lien. It is a move of fear and desperation. 2. Assess your own vulnerability. Will a few days in jail seriously affect your life? If not, you have some psychological leverage. Otherwise, the judge has a lever over you. 3. If your lien does end up in court, you may want to have a lawyer or a talented pro se with you, so that somebody can file an effective writ of habeas corpus, if necessary. You may wish to learn how to effectively defend yourself against contempt charges. Commercial lien case against Judge 4. If the judge actually does imprison you on a bogus contempt charge, he becomes personally liable for civil damages under Title 42 USC 1983 (or state equivalent), criminal sanctions, and a commercial lien. The judge is taking a risk by violating your rights. He is probably hoping that you dont know how to pursue an effective legal remedy. In many ways, this is a game of "chicken." Chapter 7 - The Coloring Agreement Approach Background Many libertarian and patriot pro se litigants have had their Constitutional arguments rejected by a Federal
72
judge, with the words "We wont have that document in this courtroom; this is an Admiralty court, not a court of law!" Don Smith, a pro se "attorney-in-fact," has devised an approach that may get around this problem. He calls it "The Coloring Agreement." The idea is to; Make the Constitution and the Bill of Rights colorable law in Admiralty jurisdiction. In this way, the Constitution and the Bill of Rights are simply contractual provisions that can be enforced in an Admiralty court. This is a kind of "Chinese box" approach to the Constitution, whereby: The Constitution encompasses Admiralty jurisdiction 1. Admiralty jurisdiction encompasses the Uniform Commercial Code 2. The U.C.C. encompasses contracts, including the "coloring agreement" 3. The "coloring agreement" encompasses the Constitution, once again! Instructions If a Federal, state or local official violates your rights (or credibly threatens to do so), take the Coloring Agreement (Appendix B.5). Substitute your name and the name of the government official in question, and be sure to substitute all references to Arizona law with those of your own state or locality. If the presentee is a Federal official, you may choose to omit the references to state law. Compel him/her to accept it, based upon the oath of office. Present the Coloring Agreement to the official in question, either in person or by certified mail. If the official is under oath to defend the Constitution of the United States (or the state in question), (s) he is bound by the agreement, whether or not (s) he accepts it or dishonors it. Present the agreement up to three times. If it is returned (dishonored) each time, then you may sue to compel him/her to accept it, based upon the oath of office. In our case of New Zealand 1852 Constitution of Moai Crown Confederation CONSTUTUTION and JURISDICTION of MOAI GOD since Queen Elizabeth II gets her Authority from GOD through the Pope Create a civil contract (not tort) liability for the government agent Don Smith expands upon the theory as follows. "The object is to create a civil contract (not tort) liability for the government agent. For violating your constitutional rights, which rights is probably not part of the agreement that you signed, and is the reason the government agent is bothering you in the first place. This will likely have a chilling effect on the agents activities toward you; i.e., you will probably not hear from him again . . . "For any violation, simply file contract (not tort) action to recover the amount specified in the Coloring Agreements schedule. If the violator is a Federal sworn employee, sue in U.S. Court of Federal Claims, 717 Madison Pl N.W., Washington, D.C. . . .
73
Court of Claims, if over $10,000, sounding in admiralty-instance. You WANT TO BE IN ADMIRALTY Court for Liable Prize. "When The Beast invades [your] rights thereafter, your suit is in CONTRACT instead of equity. If IRS is involved, this moves the case into the Court of Claims, if over $10,000, sounding in admiralty-instance. Under $10,000, the District Court sits as a Court of Claims to enforce the contract dispute if a federal defendant, and if the case sounds in admiralty-instance . . . You WANT TO BE IN ADMIRALTY, not equity, since you dont have any squish in the decision of the court. The same can be done in state court, sounding in admiralty-instance. You need only characterize your pleading as a complaint in the way of libel. Libels may be used for judgments as well as prize. You want strict enforcement of the contract. You dont want equity civil rights enforcement . . . "If the government employee/official ignores the Coloring Agreement and proceeds to violate the rights you have established by contract, you may file a Commercial Lien against him . . . " [for a sample lien see Appendix B.8]. Smith points out that this approach only creates an agreement between you and the specific government official involved. He also states that it will only work if the official has sworn an oath of office; otherwise the official will simply dishonor the agreement. However, if the official is not under an oath of office, this can still have a chilling effect. Official has not sworn an oath of office Imagine an official pleading, in court, to have the agreement set aside because he (the official) has not sworn an oath of office! This creates many "embarrassing issues." For example, if the official is not under oath, is he an impostor, acting in his own capacity? If not, whom does he really work for? Are all his official acts legally void? Should all prisoners prosecuted by him/her be released from prison? Rather than open up such a "can of worms," the "oath-less" official is much more likely to drop matters and leave you alone. Don Smith writes a newsletter, "Writ Rap." To obtain a copy, send SASE to Don Smith, nRa, c/o General Delivery, Laveen 39, Arizona. For back issues or teleconference, send one unopened roll of stamps to the same address, and you will receive three 720 kB disks (Word Perfect 4.2 format). All of Mr. Smiths material used in this manual is reproduced with permission. Chapter 8 - Final Thoughts by Alfred Adask [Editor: This chapter consists of excerpts from several editorials by Alfred Adask, editor/publisher of the AntiShyster. All excerpts and quotations from Mr. Adask are reprinted with permission from the AntiShyster, P.O.B. 540786, Dallas, Texas 75354-0786, or call (214) 559-7957 annual subscription (6 issues) $25. For additional information about the AntiShyster, see http://www.antishyster.com.] THATS CONTEMPTIBLE Precisely because the commercial lien is so powerful, that even judges cannot remove it, you may run into particularly cantankerous, abusive, tyrannical old judge who cant stand the idea that his powers might not be irresistibly god-like. If you encounter one of these megalomaniacs, he may decide to exceed his lawful power
74
and jail you for contempt of court (for insisting on your lawful rights). Since he cannot declare the lien illegal or invalid, charging you with contempt of court is probably his only recourse his last resort . . Learn how to defend yourself against contempt citations. So as you already know, you can be absolutely right in your application of the law, and still wind up in the slammer. Therefore, before you start liening on" government officials, youd best learn how to defend yourself against contempt citations. Pro ses The various lien strategies are not toys for playful pro ses. These strategies appear to be so powerful, so threatening to the "bad guys," that you can bet that they will respond forcefully and exploit whatever powers they have, lawful or otherwise, to defeat these liens. So be careful. IT TAKES MORE THAN BRAINS Judges routinely abuse their authority and get away with it, so whats to stop em from abusing their authority in any case involving commercial liens? You, your courage, Your commitment brains and knowledge is not enough. It also takes guts. Only you can stop the judicial abuse. And, initially, itll be tough. There will be some casualties. But what it boils down to is this: 1) This is a Civil Rights struggle. Its political. That means lots of people. Therefore, you cant go after the system or its henchmen by yourself you must work with others who are in a position to support you in court, in the media, and, if necessary, in jail. 2) Initially, a few folks who file commercial liens will have to be willing to "pay the price" of going to jail in order to draw media attention to the judicial abuse and to the original crimes that precipitated the particular commercial lien. (If that thought is distressing, realize that from the point of view of the "other side". It will be necessary for a few judges to risk being sued, impeached, even jailed in order to "scare" us out of filing liens, i.e., unknown to most of us, the judges are also in jeopardy.) Your incarceration may expose the judge himself to personal liability. 3) A judicial threat is not the same as a judicial act. Threatening to jail you is not likely to create a "cause of action" since you have not been "damaged." Without the "damage" of false imprisonment, you cant sue/lien the judge himself. So the judge is more interested in threatening (bluffing) you into compliance than in actually jailing you since your incarceration may expose the judge himself to personal liability. We must try to scare the judges with "threats" of public exposure 4) Just as judges will try to scare us off with threats of contempt, we must try to scare the judges with "threats" of public exposure, and even civil and criminal charges filed against the judges. The "law" is not the only issue. This is also a test of will and nerve. Hes got to know that you wont quit . . .
75
Youve got to realize that the "practice of law" involves a great deal more than just "law." It involves psychological warfare, guile, bluff, and the ability to "read" your adversary. Remember, despite what you might be led to believe by the movies, court cases are not scholarly "debates" so much as contests, even street fights. Knowing the law is just the beginning. Youve also got to be able to "know your opponent" and, also, to keep youre opponents from "knowing" you . . . Its not enough to have the words. Youve got to have the guts enough to stand behind them, knowing that you might not win, knowing that you might even suffer a serious punishment for saying the words. If the judge smells fear, he can slap you around even if youre right. If he smells courage and conviction sufficient to cause him personal liability, he will be reluctant to mistreat you even if you are wrong. This is not just law its politics. And more than politics, its a fight. Do you understand A fight? Complete with black eyes and bloody noses, and sometimes-even worse. The judge can hurt you if you stand alone, but if you stand with others, you can hurt the judge But its a fair fight, because, as bad as those judges may be, they are human and they know they are outnumbered thousands to one. The judge can hurt you if you stand alone, but if you stand with others, you can hurt the judge. In the final analysis, the issue will be settled as an act of will and courage. The side that refuses to lose will win it. A "SILVER BULLET RIFLE" Its a do-it-yourself project and youre it. "Patriot" and "pro se" publications . . . routinely present new strategies, which purport to overcome the various forms of institutionalized injustice in the American legal system. Often, these new strategies are implicitly "guaranteed" to work first-time-every-time to quickly defeat injustice and achieve results most people would regard as impossible. These "cant lose" strategies are generally known as "Silver Bullets." Adherents of these Silver Bullet strategies often embrace and espouse them with a religious fervor, so sure that they are absolutely right, they tolerate no deviation from their "ultimate truth." Critics, however, remind us that the term "Silver Bullets" is derived from the "cant miss" accuracy of the Lone Ranger and the mystical effect of "silver bullets" on werewolves and other creatures of the night (like lawyers, judges and IRS agents). These critics contend that todays Silver Bullets are every bit as fictitious as their forebears, and to believe in any of them is equally naive or even delusional. The critics may be right. Perhaps there are no Silver Bullets to stop injustice. After all, our laws and courts are capricious and complex, that every search for Justice has become a kind of crapshoot in which anything is possible and nothing can be precisely predicted or relied upon. So do silver Bullets really exist? I think they do. I believe in Silver Bullets because ultimately, I believe in rule by law rather than rule by men, and so I must believe in the LAW and its essence Silver Bullets. After all, in the final analysis, Silver Bullets are nothing more than quintessential, irrefutable, unbeatable principles and applications of LAW. . . .
76
So, having confessed my belief in Silver Bullets, do I claim to sell em in publications like this [AntiShyster]? Can you depend on every article, on every opinion, on every word we publish to be accurate, irrefutable, and "guaranteed" to give you victory every time? Absolutely not- Can you depend on any of the theories and strategies presented in this publication to qualify as Silver Bullets? Maybe Sometimes- Actually, it depends . . . Depends on what? Depends on you. To continue the Silver Bullet analogy, answer this: Do you think you can throw a Silver Bullet with enough arm speed and accuracy to pierce the heart of a charging werewolf? Of course not- See my point? Armed with Silver Bullets and a proper rifle, you can kill werewolves. But without a rifle, Silver Bullets are no better than a handful of pebbles. Without the proper rifle, all you can do is fling bullets at the werewolf, and thatll only make the mutt mad. So, where can you buy a "rifle" that shoots Silver Bullets? Sorry, you cant buy one. But you can make your own. And where can you make such a "rifle"? In quiet room a freedomry or a church- sometimes on an athletic field. In a war, or hospital emergency room. Does this "Silver Bullet Rifle" analogy confuse you? Well, its just a riddle to try to make my point: You see, you are the "Rifle." Just as you cant shoot a .22 caliber bullet without a .22 caliber rifle, you cant fire a Silver Bullet without a "Silver Bullet Rifle." To successfully aim and fire a Silver Bullet, you must become a "Silver Bullet Rifle." You must be "machined" to achieve the proper caliber and barrel strength to withstand the explosion. You must have your "sights" aligned with solid judgment to reliably strike your target. And, perhaps most importantly, you must have or create enough personal courage to pull the trigger. To fire Silver Bullets, you need more than information, you need understanding which only you can provide. And more than understanding, you need determination, persistence and courage in other words, you must have the personal character necessary to "shoot werewolves." So who will "machine" you into a "rifle" of the proper strength and caliber to fire Silver Bullets? The answers obvious. Its a do-it-yourself project and youre it. And how will you "machine yourself" into a Silver Bullet Rifle? The answer is beyond the scope of this publication. Suffice it to say that each of us will use a different method to discover or create our own courage, morality and character. But know that you cant fire Silver Bullets accurately until you first make yourself into someone with a long-term commitment to Justice rather than a short-term appetite for a quick personal advantage. Remember that Silver Bullets are not magic incantations. Some folks use Silver Bullets with great success; others use the very same words and forms but fail. Its not enough to merely say the words or fill out the form. You must understand what you are doing. Silver Bullets are merely instructions, procedures and directions that tell you how someone else killed their particular werewolf. Silver Bullets provide only information. You must provide the understanding, courage and character necessary to apply the information correctly . . . Dont depend on mere words and forms; dont depend on luck. Dont depend on Silver Bullets. Depend on you. Depend on your perseverance, your understanding, and your determination to seek Justice rather than unearned
77
wealth or revenge. Continuing study of Law will lead you to the concept of Justice morality, on to religion then onto MOAI GOD So are the theories and strategies in this publication Silver Bullets? Maybe- Will they save your house or your car? Will they save your money, your job, your business, or your family? Sometimes, yes and Sometimes, no. But even if you lose, your efforts wont go un-rewarded. In the end, the search for Silver Bullets may create something unexpected and more valuable than property or even relationships: it may create a human "Rifle" - a moral being endowed with understanding, courage and character. Believe it or not, the continuing study of Law (not procedure, which the lawyers revere) will lead you to the concept of Justice, then to morality, on to religion, and finally, perhaps, even to God. So good luck to you, ladies and gentlemen. You have begun a long journey and a challenging hunt. You may have started by looking for Silver Bullets, but you may end by finding, even creating, a person of real value yourself. Editors comment: For most worthwhile things, you must expand your personal power. We at Moai Crown generally figure there are "Silver Bullet" solutions that work in Moai Gods time. Mr. Adasks comments are an excellent exposition of some of the thinking skills required for success in any use you might make of this manual and for success in general. The conduit (rifle) is you! You are the one who needs to individually determine (in good faith of course) what statutes apply to you. You are the one who needs to apply information in a manner that applies to you in that particular situation. Then, and only then, you have knowledge about that subject. APPENDIX A - Sources and Bibliography Further Reading about Commercial Lien Strategy The following publications are available from the AntiShsyter, P.O.B. 540786, Dallas, Texas 75354-0786, or call (214) 559-7957 or visit http://www.antishyster.com. Commercial Lien Study Guide, by Alfred Adask Commercial Liens II, by Hartford Van Dyke Common Law Lien Study Guide, by Alfred Adask Paralegal Support The Right Way L.A.W. see Report #LAW01 The Right Way L.A.W. Don Smith writes a newsletter, "Writ Rap." To obtain a copy, send SASE to Don Smith, nRa, c/o General Delivery, Laveen 39, Arizona. For back issues or teleconference, send one unopened roll of stamps to the same address, and you will receive three 720 kB disks (Word Perfect 4.2 format). Basic Legal References Blacks Law Dictionary, 6th Edition (West Publishers)
78
Federal Rules of Civil Procedure Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure United States Code, Annotated (available at most public freedomries) American Jurisprudence, Second Edition (Lawyers Cooperative Publishing Company) Corpus Juris Secundum The statutes of your own state or locality Appendix B Index of Sample Legal Briefs Please note: You will have to reformat these briefs using your word processing software, and you MUST adapt them to your situation, and to the requirements of your state or locality. These are not and (in the nature of things) cannot be "fill-in-the-blank" forms. B.1 - Example of Notice and Demand B.2 - Example of Notice of Default B.3 - Model Commercial Affidavit B.4 - Model Criminal Complaint B.5 - The Coloring Agreement B.6 - Phil Marshs Lien on the U.S. Government B.7 - Nelson Starrs Lien on Judges and IRS Agents B.8 - Model Commercial Lien Appendix B.1 - Example of Notice and Demand This Notice is an example, not a form. This shows what one person in Georgia did. Also, quite a bit of "exotic" evidence is introduced in this Notice. Before using such evidence, you should look up the cited material, and make your own decision about whether the information is accurate and useful. CHARLES RONALD GRAY THE PEOPLE OF THE REPUBLIC OF GEORGIA AS EXTEND TO PEOPLE OF THE REPUBLIC OF AOTEA NEW ZEALANDMoai Gods Grace Rock Face is Superior Crown Earth Ruler Authority and Administrator as Moai God Copyright Spirit Commercial Lien Title of Moai Wanoa Royal Tahitian-African Male Monarch Sovereign State. Are Inheritors of Gods World Sovereign Peoples Confederation. Holds the Clear Debt Free Allodial Title to all Moai God Crown Land free of Debt, Mortgage, Liens. Moai is the reigning Monarch Power shut down illegal Sole Businesses stealing money from Moai Sovereigns through Corrupt CT Land Titles and Fraud Bank Mortgage No End Date Contracts, Fractional Banking, all Fraud Resource Management Acts of States, Governments Parliaments. In any part in the World Sole Persons using the Fraud Queen Elizabeth II and Pope Crown Alien (E)State Pope Adolfo Nicolas Pachon as their Monarchy Sovereignty Head of State over the Queen who is abdicating with all her aliens who emigrated to Indigenous Native Lands are now Moai Lien Debtors with the Pope, Queen of England, Rothschilds. Moai Crown has Absolute Monarchy Government over Moai God Earth World Authority Ruler Memorial Title Lien in Queen Elizabeth II Great Court London extinguished the Queen of Englands Fraud Royal Family Monarch Title Succession to Prince Charles and her assigns Authority from God Almighty she cant prove ever existed. She swore her Oath to the Jesuit Generals of Pope Pachon and Pope Francis Satan Devil Hell God
79
Joel M. Feldman, Magistrate/Commissioner Administrative Tribunal d/b/a United States District Court Northern District of Georgia, Atlanta Division Richard B. Russell Bldg., 75 Spring Street S.W., Atlanta, Georgia RE: NOTICE AND DEMAND "Warrant For Entry on Premises to Effect Levy s" PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.S. 645 & 654 MISPRISON 18 U.S.C.S. 4 & 2382 YOU, JOEL M. FELDMAN, acting under wrongfully assumed Powers and Authority and under pretense and colors of Office, Laws, and Title, are hereby given Notice of ownership of real and personal property stolen, embezzled, converted and/or purloined, by and through certain illegal and unlawful acts, including, but not limited to, wrongful issuance of 2 or more WRITS OF ASSISTANCE, and/or "Warrant For Entry On Premises To Effect Levy" issued by you on April 1, 1992, in Civil Action No.1:92:M-433 (see Exhibits 1, 2, and 3 attached hereto). The same was effected by out of court modes and procedures, and under force of arms on April 6, 1992, by at least 9 agents of your Foreign Principals and Organizations, including, but not limited to, T[erri] Perrine, Revenue Officer; Ken W. Ross, Revenue Officer; and others whose names are not known to me at this time. You and/or your officers, employees, deputies, assistants, representatives, receivers, servants and/or agents, have illegally and unlawfully seized, stolen, retained and are believed still to be in unlawful possession, custody, and/or control of approximately 400 [four hundred] "Dollars," "Silver," and 5 [five] "Dollars," "Gold," minted by the United States Mint[s], belonging to the undersigned Charles Ronald Gray, which was in safe keeping in the safe, display cases, and office desk, located at 418 Woodward Avenue, Atlanta, Georgia, in the County of Fulton, within the territorial jurisdiction of the Republic of Georgia. You and Your Foreign Principals, Organizations, and Agents have been forbidden from Lending, Loaning, or Borrowing on the Security of the above stated Lawful, Constitutional Gold and Silver Coins. Pursuant to Act of Congress, inter alia, 18 U.S.C.S. 337, Public law 90-269; 82 Stat. 50. and Public Law 95-147, 91 Stat. 1227, and are thereby precluded from any right, title, or claim upon or to the same, as a matter of necessary operation of law. (See Exhibits C-2, C-3, entered into the docket of the Court). You and your Officers, Employees, Agents and Representatives are "Agents Of A Foreign Principal" pursuant to 22 U.S.C.S. 611, and are directed, controlled, financed, subsidized and/or compensated for aiding, abetting, counseling, commanding, representing, and procuring the gathering of information. Soliciting, collecting, disbursing, dispensing contributions, loans, money, currency, or other things of value for. Or in interest of "The United Nations," whose seat of government is in New York City. New York (22 U.S.C.S. 287, 61 Stat. 3416) "The Association" (22 U.S.C.S. 284 et seq.), "The Bank" and "The Fund" (22 U.S.C.S. 286 et seq.), and their subsidiary artificial beings pursuant to Public Law 94-564, Public Law 86-147, Public Law 89-369, Public Law 93-83, 87 Stat. 197, et cetera. (See also: 22 U.S.C.S. 263(a); 22 U.S.C.S. 285(g); 22 U.S.C.S. 287(j); 26 U.S.C.S. 6103(k)(4); Executive Order 10033.) The Internal Revenue Service Agents, et al, are in fact engaged in inter-agency, international stipulations, agreements and commerce with "The Association" And/or the "International Bank for Reconstruction and Development,". And its many-faceted subsidiary, artificial beings, pursuant to "Treasury Delegation Order No. 91
80
(Rev. 1)," and "Service Agreements described in paragraph IV, of the General Agreement between the Treasury Department and the Agency for International Development, dated February 14, 1966" (Bretton Woods Agreement; 22 U.S.C.S. 284 et seq.). The character of "The Association," "The Bank," "The Fund," and the Governor of the Fund a/k/a Secretary of the Treasury. (See: 22 U.S.C.S. 286(a)), his associates, delegates, officers, employees, representatives, servants, and/or agents, being the real parties in interest. were and are now subject to Article III, Section 2, Clauses 1 and 2, as a matter of supreme Law, and/or Act of Congress, 22 U.S.C.S. 286(g). Your acts and/or authorization of acts committed by said Officers, Employees, Delegates, Associates, Representatives, Deputies, Receivers and/or Agents, et cetera, are administrative acts, done under color of a Magistrate/Commissioner (See: U.S. v. Ferreira, 13 How. (54 U.S.) 40, 14 L.Ed. 42; Murrays Lessee et al. v. Hoboken Land & Improvement Co. 18 How. (59 U.S.) 272, 15 L. Ed. 372) and under Letters of Marque issued on behalf of YOUR Foreign Principal. And its artificial Organizations, and clearly in excess of the express and conditional, delegated and vested Powers and Authority, as established by the Ordained Constitution for the Union of several States of the United States of America. Clean Hands Doctrine and Public Policy claim or right, title or interest thereon I, Charles Ronald Gray, RIGHTFULLY DEMAND immediate return of the above stated sum of approximately 400 [four hundred] "Dollars," "Silver," and 5 [five] "Dollars," "Gold," minted by the United States Mint(s). i.e. Money, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.S. 645, and all other property and rights to property as stolen, confiscated and expropriated in violation of Act of Congress. Coded Title 18 U.S.C.S. 654 and 241; and under authority of the Declaration of Independence; the Ordained Constitution for the united States of America (1787), Article I Section 10, Clause l; Act of Congress, coded Title 31 U.S.C.S. 314, 321, 5112; Public Law 93-110, Article IV, Section 2; and Amendments I, IV, V, VI, IX, and X, and that the same said property be returned to my personal care, custody, possession and control, at the address given above from which it was taken, seized, stolen and confiscated, within ten (10) days of receipt of this Notice and Demand. Further, due to the residency and collateral fact that You and/or your Foreign Principals, Organizations, Associations, Officers, Employees, Representatives, Servants, or other Individuals acting under their direction and control, are incapable of maintaining the integrity of the de jure. Lawful, Constitutional Monetary System of the de jure Union of several Republican States of the United States of America. And are not heirs in Law or by birthright. I.e. Posterity, and have caused grievous harm, damage and injury under pretense and colors. And are in breach of numerous legal duties imposed upon our Public Offices, and you, by Law are barred, estopped and precluded under the "Clean Hands doctrine," and "Public Policy," from making any claim or right, title, or interest thereon. (See: 18 U.S.C.S. 1001) NOTICE OF INTENT applied to MOAI GODS LAW MOAI CROWN CORPORATION NA ATUA E WA AOTEA LTD These US WRITS are extended to PEOPLE OF THE REPUBLIC OF AOTEA NEW ZEALAND- MOAI CONFEDERATION YOU are hereby given further NOTICE of Intent to Seek, Commence, and Criminally Prosecute all those responsible under all applicable provisions and Mandates of the Ordained Constitution for the Union of several States of the United States of America. And Na Atua E Wa Aotea New Zealand and Moai Pacific Ring of Fire Boundary Claim Area MOAI MU ISLANDS and MOAI EARTH GODS WORLD and Laws made in pursuance thereof, including, but not limited to 18 U.S.C.S. 219, 241, 242, 645, 654, 912, 951, and 1001, to wit: Enactment of MOAI CONFEDERATIONS Congress is fined not more than double the value of money embezzled imprisoned.
81
MOAI CROWN LIEN INDICTMENT AFFIDAVIT ARREST WARRANTS handed down by ICJ & ITCCS World Court Brussels 18 U.S.C.S. 645 "Whoever, being a MOAI GODS WORLD ORDER CONFEDERATION and United States marshal, clerk, receiver, referee, trustee, or other Officer of a United States court, or any deputy, assistant, or employee of any such officer, retains or converts to his own use or the use of another. Or after demand by the party entitled thereto, unlawfully retains any money coming into his hands by virtue of his official relation, position or employment, is guilty of embezzlement. Shall, where the offense is not otherwise punishable by enactment of Congress be fined not more than double the value of the money so embezzled or imprisoned. Not more than ten years, or both; but if the amount does not exceed $100, he shall be fined not more than $1,000 or imprisoned not more than one year, or both." 1. "It shall not be a defense that the accused Person had any interest in the moneys or fund." 2. Unlawfully misused the vested Powers and Authority of the same said Public Office YOU, Joel M. Feldman, were further forewarned and duly informed by the Administrative Demand and Administrative Law Brief sent by Certified Mail. Return Receipt Requested Docket Number P 851 244 440 et seq. to the Governor of the Fund, United States Attorney General. et al, of certain criminal acts, which you willfully chose to evade and ignore, and have continued to illegally and unlawfully misuse the vested Powers and Authority of the same said Public Office to aid, abet, counsel, command and procure the commission and furtherance of the same illegal and unlawful activity, modes and procedures, and are prohibited from holding or enjoying any Office of Public Trust, Honor, or Profit within the Union of several States of the United States of America, and are believed to have sworn and subscribed a false and fraudulent Oath (See: Form 61, OMB Approval No. 50-R0118E; "The Tempting of America," Bork, pg. 155 et seq., also see Complaint, Atkins et al. v. U.S., Docket No. 41-76, United States court of Claims, filed February 11, 1976; Atkins et al. v. U.S., 556 F2d 1028; U.S. v. Wills, 499 U.S. 200, 66 L.Ed.2d 392, 101 S. Ct. 471), and have foreign obligation, allegiances, and masters. TIMELY NOTICE AND DEMAND HAS BEEN GIVEN YOU! (18 U.S.C.S. 4, 2382) Testified this _____ day of _____________ , in the year of our Lord 1992. Most Sincerely, s/ Charles Ronald Gray, Sui Juris, Jus Soli, Jus Sanguinis C/O 897 Edgewood Ave., N.E., Atlanta, Georgia Teste Meipso FULTON COUNTY STATE OF GEORGIA ) ) )
ss:
82
Subscribed and affirmed to before me this _______day of ______________ , 1992. _____________________ Notary Public My Commission expires: _______________________ Certified Mail Number P 340 103 180 Appendix B.2 - Example of Notice of Default RECORDING REQUESTED BY [Name1] AND WHEN RECORDED MAIL TO: [Name1] <No IRS zone number [ZIP CODE > <Not in any federal enclave> SPACE ABOVE THIS LINE FOR RECORDERS USE ================================================================== NOTICE OF DEFAULT AFFIDAVIT OF NOTICE TO: YOU ARE HEREBY NOTICED that you are in default of an opportunity to respond to the COMMERCIAL AFFIDAVIT sent to you on [date] by certified mail. You were given the opportunity to rebut the claims made against you by your failure to answer said AFFIDAVIT. A DEFAULT JUDGEMENT is being sought against you having waived the right to answer by acquiescence, tacit admission and failure to contest, rejecting your due process opportunity. (See Randone v. Appellate Court, 5 C3d 536; Mullane v Central Hanover Trust Co., 339 U.S. 306, 314; Sniadach v. Family Finance Corp., 395 U.S. 337, 339; Melorich Builders v. Superior Court, 160 Cal App 3d 931, as in line with California Code of Civil Procedure 437(c), defaults.) IN ABSENCE of such response, Affiant, [name1], hereby inserts and records this NOTICE OF DEFAULT. Upon and against above named Respondent(s) pursuant the California Constitution Article I Sections 1, 3, 19, 24, 26, 28(b), Article II Section 1, California Civil Code Section 22.2, California Civil Procedure Section 437(c), California Penal Code Section 9.
83
WHEREAS such actions now shall be taken in accordance to the procedures set forth in the COMMERCIAL AFFIDAVIT defaulted. I, [name1], have personal knowledge of the above facts, am competent to testify to the above facts, and declare that the foregoing is true, correct and complete under the penalty of perjury. DATED: ___________________ Enforced Liens. NOTE: On 1st May 2013 this Moai Crown Commercial Lien became Effective
___________________________________ [Name1], Sui juris [jurat and notary seal] Appendix B.3 - A Model Commercial Affidavit This example shows what a valid Commercial Affidavit looks like. You must change legal citations to suit your situation and the requirements of your state or locality. Also, the "Appendix A" cited in the Affidavit was composed by the Affidavits author, and represents his understanding of the requirements of Title 15 U.S.C. [Name] c/o address City, Non-domestic [State], Republic COMMERCIAL AFFIDAVIT for MOAI CROWN STATE CONFEDERATION OF THE WORLDS SOVEREIGN PEOPLE NOTE: On 1st May 2013 this Moai Crown Commercial Lien became Effective Enforced Liens. 1. AFFIDAVIT OF NOTICE, DECLARATION, AND DEMAND 2. FAIR NOTICE AND WARNING OF COMMERCIAL GRACE 3. NOTICE OF NON-JUDICIAL PROCEEDING 4. THIS IS A U.S. S.E.C. TRACER FLAG, NOT A POINT OF LAW 5. A SECURITY (15 USC) COMMERCIAL AFFIDAVIT U.S. S.E.C. TRACER FLAG NOT A POINT OF LAW READ attached APPENDIX A
84
STATE OF [state] COUNTY OF [county] ) ) ) ss: TO: *** [ALL PARTIES TO RECEIVE THIS AFFIDAVIT, name, address, sent certified mail] Name Address City, state
CERTIFIED MAIL NUMBER
This action is taken in accordance with the California Penal Code Section 9, which states: CIVIL REMEDIES; PRESERVATION: The omission to specify or affirm in this Code any liability to damages, penalty, forfeiture, or other remedy imposed by law and allowed to be recovered or enforced in any civil action or proceeding. For any act or omission declared punishable herein, does not affect any right to recover or enforce the same. I [name], the Undersigned, ***[by any special conditions of standing, i.e. a trustee of a trust] do solemnly swear, declare, and depose: 1. THAT I am competent to state to the matters set forth herein. 2. THAT I have personal knowledge of the facts stated herein. 3. THAT all the facts stated herein are true, correct, and certain, admissible as evidence, and if called upon as a witness, I will testify to their veracity. 4. THAT the eternal, unchanged principles of Commercial Law are: a) A workman is worthy of his hire. (Thou shalt not steal) b) All are equal under the law. (No one is above the law) c) In Commerce, truth is sovereign. (Thou shalt not bear false witness) d) Truth is expressed in the form of an affidavit. e) An unrebutted affidavit stands as truth in Commerce. f) An unrebutted affidavit becomes the judgment in Commerce. g) All matters must be expressed to be resolved. h) He who leaves the battlefield first loses by default. i) Sacrifice is the measure of credibility (no willingness to sacrifice = no liability, responsibility, authority or measure of conviction) j) A lien or claim can be satisfied only through an affidavit by a point-for-point rebuttal. Resolution by jury or payment
85
5. THAT Commercial processes (including this Affidavit and required responses to it) ARE NON-JUDICIAL and prejudicial because: a) No judge, court, government or any agencies thereof, or any other third parties whatsoever, can abrogate anyones affidavit of truth; and b) Only a party affected by an affidavit can speak and act for himself and is solely responsible for responding with his own affidavit of truth, which no one else can do for him. 6. THAT the lawful seizure, collection, and transfer of ownership of money or property must be effected by a valid Commercial Lien which must contain certain elements in order to be Commercially valid, to wit: a) The lien instrument must obviously, patently, and evidently be a LIEN by being clearly and explicitly titled "LIEN," "CLAIM OF LIEN," or "DECLARATION OF LIEN," and mandatorily, by its exhaustive Commercial content (full disclosure) as follows in b), c) and d); b) The lien instrument MUST CONTAIN a notarized hand-signed affidavit, for which the issuer is commercially liable, containing a plain statement of fact disclosing how the obligation of the lien was created, attesting that the commercial condition is true, correct, and certain; c) The lien instrument MUST CONTAIN a ledger or bookkeeping statement connecting purchases, services rendered, and/or injuries sustained, with a claim of obligation such that each purchase, service, and/or injury is presented in a one-to-one correspondence with its partial claim of obligation. The partial obligations are then totalled to obtain the total obligation. This is called a "True Bill in Commerce." d) The lien instrument MUST CONTAIN a statement, either specific or general, of the property being seized from the lien debtor to satisfy, or to guarantee satisfaction of, the obligation of the lien. e) A NOTICE OF LIEN to be valid MUST CONTAIN a clear statement as to where the lien is filed, where it can be found and how a copy can be obtained. 7. THAT I am not the creation or chattel property of any person or any government agency whatsoever. I am not under any obligation whatsoever to any governmental agency, state or federal, or any of their self-passed laws, statutes, regulations or policies. 8. THAT any and all of the various papers, documents, adhesion contracts, or "agreements" I may have signed with any government agency or entity or any others that might be construed to indicate a conclusion contrary to my herein-below assertions were made. Signed by me on the basis of mistake due to lack of full disclosure creating a deliberate lack of full knowledge, a deliberate action of fraud, non-disclosure, concealment of material fact, and misrepresentation. Such action thereby creates a stressful situation of duress and intimidation, vitiating all documents by such action of fraud. 9. THAT it is the sincerest belief, religious and spiritual conviction of this Affiant that slavery and peonage are immoral, are violations of the First Precept of Commercial Law (a workman is worthy of his hire. "Thou shalt not steal"), that fraud, misrepresentation, nondisclosure, intimidation, deceit, concealment of material fact, lying, and treachery are morally wrong. 10. THAT I have absolutely no desire whatsoever to be a "client" (slave) of any governmental agency, state or federal, or any of their Principals, or the "United States." And State of Aotea New Zealand Moai Crown
86
Confederations World. And or to incur any debts or obligations to said entities for whatever "benefits" said entities might purpose to provide or seek to provide to this Affiant. Or be directed by, subject to, or accountable to any parties other than my own conscience and best judgement for the purpose of preserving inviolate my unalienable/inalienable rights to life, liberty, freedom and property. While I engage in the honorable, productive, and non-harmful activities of my life as HOANI WANOA Monarch Sovereign versus ELIZABETH WINDSOR. 11. THAT I, [name], HOANI WANOA Monarch Sovereign am the sole and absolute owner of myself, my body, and my estate, and possess unconditional, allodial, sovereign title thereto. And that I abjure, renounce, forsake, and disavow utterly and absolutely now and forever all presumptions of power, authority, or right by any governmental agency, its Principals, over the rights, life, liberty, freedom or property of this Affiant from whatever source presumed or derived. 12. THAT NO COMMERCIAL PAPERWORK or COMMERCIAL AFFIDAVITS have been furnished or supplied to me, [Name], by [parties] or any others that created the so-called liability thus far is at an end. I am the MONARCH SOVEREIGN OF MOAI GOD. 13. 14. [*** AFFIDAVIT INSERTS modeled. BE SURE TO RENUMBER] {Plus any other points that may have to be added too, clearly state a claim of abuses relative to your case. BE SURE TO RENUMBER FOLLOWING POINTS} 15. THAT I, [name], the Undersigned, herewith and herein demand of ALL PARTIES involved in anyway in this socalled cause of action, who attempt or continue to proceed against me or my properties in the instant cause of action in any way, furnish answers to the following: a) Where is the real and true Commercial Paperwork bearing on this instant matter that made me liable? b) Where are the real, true, proper and lawful assessments bearing on this instant matter that I am said to be liable? c) Where are the itemized statement, ledger and accounting for services rendered with respect to this instant matter? d) What or who are the Parties engaging in fair business practices in the instant matter? e) Where is the full disclosure bearing on all matters pertaining to this instant matter? f) Where are the clean hands? g) Where is the good faith action? h) Where are the truth, mercy, grace, and all similar just and virtuous qualities and proceedings based on them that are supposed to inhere in commerce and the Uniform Commercial Code? 16. THAT all parties who act against this Affiant on their alleged basis must produce the Commercial Affidavits of TRUTH. Sworn by the claimants to be "true, correct, and complete (certain)" which prove the origin and
87
foundation of their claims. And include providing the contract(s) or agreement(s) with the signature of this Affiant thereon wherein this Affiant. Has knowingly, intentionally, and voluntarily, in full legal and lawful capacity. Agreed to waive or surrender rights to the IRS, its Principals, or the "United States," or agreed to become subject to or the slave or property of said entities in any way or in any jurisdiction whatsoever, and for Moai World. 17. In order for a crime to exist, four elements must exist; there must be a defined crime, there must be a victim that the victim must have been damaged, and the intent must be established on the part of the accused. Without proof of all four elements, no crime can said to have been committed. In this Affidavit, crimes are defined, the Affiant is the victim, this Affidavit verifies the damages, and the intent is established at the end of the thirty (30) day grace period, if the respondents fail to rebut (respond to) the wrongs they have been a party to as noted herein. 18. NOTICE is hereby given, and demands made, on all Claimants [parties], [other Officials, Attorneys, Judges], and any other involved Parties, that: a) ALL properties taken unlawfully, removed in violation of commerce, or otherwise converted, sold, or seized by [any party (ies), name them], or other Parties in collusion therewith, be immediately returned IN FULL VALUE ($) PLUS 10% to [name], the Undersigned Affiant, justly possessing the lawful and legal title thereto; for MOAI CROWN WORLD CONFEDERATION OR b) All Parties who proceed to act or assist in said actions, against this Affiant, [name], without thorough, verifiable, point-by-point rebuttal of each and every point set forth in this Affidavit. Shall be immediately charged with criminal fraud, theft, conspiracy of extortion, theft and fraud, and commercial liens. Shall be placed against all their real and personal properties. (defined crimes: California Penal Code Section 182 criminal conspiracy, 211 robbery, United States Criminal Code Title 18 Section 4 misprision of felony, 241 conspiracy. against the rights of citizens, 872 extortion, 1001 fraud and false statements, and other such crimes as are related to issues of RACKETEERING 18 USC 1961, plus such Constitutional violations not listed in the Criminal Codes combined and described simply as TREASON); and c) All court costs and legal fees relating to this instant case shall be paid by those who have drawn the undersigned Affiant [name] into this instant matter; AND 19. THAT failure to respond as herein required to this Affiant, within the herein a prescribed time of thirty (30) days will be deemed by this Affiant to invoke the doctrine of acquiescence and admission, to recover, in commerce, the lost or damaged properties plus damages, penalties and costs. (California Civil Code 3281) 20. THAT in light of the foregoing declarations, all alleged contracts and agreements between this Affiant, [name], and the IRS, its Principals, or the "United States" are unconscionable and baseless. I herein, hereby and herewith revoke, disavow, and renounce my signature on any and all documents, instruments, or forms. I may have ever signed with the IRS, its Principals, or the "United States, Or any other parties or entities whatsoever that might purport to have furnished any contractual agreement or nexus between myself and the IRS, its
88
Principals, or the "United States." 21. THAT this Commercial Affidavit, Notice and Warning of Commercial Grace, is the ONE AND ONLY such Notice and Warning. If all IRS "assessments" and collection actions. Against me on their basis are not abated within thirty (30) days. Or if at any time in the future any IRS "assessments" and collection actions based thereon are re-instituted against me. It shall be considered a willful disregard for this Notice and Warning, and such shall engender the immediate filing of Criminal Complaints (Affidavits of Information) and Commercial Liens (Affidavits of Obligation) against all parties involved. 22. THAT the foundation of Commercial Law, being based on certain eternally just, valid, and moral precepts, has remained unchanged for at least six (6) millennia. Said Commercial Law forms the underpinnings of Western Civilization if not all Nations, Law, and Commerce in the world, is NON-JUDICIAL, and is prior and superior to, the basis of, and cannot be set aside or overruled by, the laws and statutes of any governments, legislatures, quasigovernmental agencies, or courts. It is therefore an inherent obligation on all Authorities, Officials, Governments, Legislatures, Governmental or Quasi-governmental Agencies, Courts, Judges, Attorneys, and all aspects and Agents of all Law Enforcement Agencies to uphold said Commercial Law. Without which said entities are violating the just basis of their alleged authority and serving to disintegrate the society they allegedly exist to protect. CONTRACT OF LIABILITY FOR ALLEGATIONS 23. THAT if the Undersigned failed to rebut such claims or charges, the Respondent would immediately declare default against the Undersigned and proceed to collect on the claims made as being in agreement with said claims or charges. The Respondents having made the claim or charge against the Undersigned, thereby creating an implied contract, the Undersigned having rebutted said claim or charge-demanding proof of said implied contract, a true binding contract was thereby created. 24. THAT the Respondents attacks on the commercial or private liability of the Undersigned Affiant, and this Affidavit or response/rebuttal to said claims or charges, created the mutually voluntary, consensual, commercial, private contract by and between the Undersigned and Respondents. Failure of Respondents to prove there claims or charges against the Undersigned within thirty (30) days US and New Zealand (21) days. (Or in the alternative cease all collection or enforcement actions against the Undersigned) shall constitute deliberate criminal actions and willful breach of and default on a bilateral contract (Affidavit of Agreement) formed knowingly, intentionally, and voluntarily by and between the Undersigned and the Respondents. 25. THAT I, [name], the Undersigned Affiant, depose and certify that I have written the foregoing with intent and understanding of purpose, and believe the statements, allegations, demands and contents herein to be true, correct, and complete, commercially reasonable, and just, to the best of my knowledge and belief. NOTICE TO PRINCIPALS IS NOTICE TO AGENTS. NOTICE TO AGENTS IS NOTICE TO PRINCIPALS. EXODUS 20:15, 16. FURTHER AFFIANT SAITH NOT. DATED:______________________ [Name], Affiant _______________________________
89
WITNESS my hand this ______day of _________________, 19__ /s/___________________________ [Name], SUI JURIS STATE OF [state] COUNTY OF [county] ) ) ) :ss On this ______day of ______________, 1994, before me, the undersigned Notary Public in and for the State of [state], appeared ___________________________, ( ) personally known to me or ( ) proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence, to be the person whose signature appears in the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he executed it. Witness my hand and official seal: /s/______________________________ NOTARY PUBLIC 26. EXPLANATION SHEET TO BE ATTACHED TO EVERY COMMERCIAL INSTRUMENT OF FILING BEARING THE U.S. S.E.C. TRACER FLAG CONTAINING THE PHRASE "A SECURITY 15 USC" 27. This EXPLANATION SHEET is to be attached to all Commercial Affidavits, including Affidavits of Obligation (Commercial Liens). Which are non-judicial consensual processes, which arise out of a breach of special performance (e.g., for public officials breach of oath of office, a violation of the Constitution for the United States of America and respective state Constitutions.) 28. The notice as follows below is included for the purposes of FULL DISCLOSURE (UCC), and as a warning noted by the flag for commercial grace at the top of the instrument. 30. Moai Crown Sovereign Monarch Confederation Flag for commercial grace at the top of the instrument. Is a warning noted by the notice as follows below is included for the purposes of FULL DISCLOSURE MOAI CROWN under (UCC) 31. This EXPLANATION SHEET is to be attached to all MOAI CROWN Commercial Affidavits, including Affidavits of Obligation (Commercial Liens). Which are non-judicial consensual processes, which arise out of a breach of special performance for public officials breach of oath of office, violations of the Constitutions for Aotea New Zealand, Australia, Britain and Canada and respective state Constitutions.) ************ COMMERCIAL AFFIDAVIT AFFIDAVIT OF NOTICE, DECLARATION, AND DEMAND
90
FAIR NOTICE AND WARNING OF COMMERCIAL GRACE THIS IS A U.S. S.E.C. TRACER FLAG, NOT A POINT OF LAW A SECURITY (15 USC) COMMERCIAL AFFIDAVIT THIS IS A U.S. S.E.C. TRACER FLAG NOT A POINT OF LAW* See attached instruction * One definition of "A SECURITY" is "any evidence of debt." * * * * * * * * * * * APPENDIX A 1. The Lien Claimant does NOT rely on Title 15 as a basis for the "Commercial Lien." ALL Commercial processes, by using or relying on notes or paper in Commerce (e.g. Federal Reserve Notes), must bear some sort of Federal tracking code, a County Recorders number or a serial number. Which process must be accessible for inspection at the nearest relevant County Recorders Office or be widely advertised. When a Lien matures in three (3) months, ninety (90) days, and New Zealand twenty one (21) days by default of the Lien Debtor. Through the Lien Debtors failure to rebut the AFFIDAVIT OF OBLIGATION point-for-point categorically. It becomes an accounts receivable in the ordinary sense of a collectable debt upon which assignments, COLLATERIZATION, and other commercial transactions can be based, hence becomes a Security subject to observation, tracking, and regulation by the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (hereinafter U.S. S.E.C.). And Moai Crown State Securities Exchange Commission of Britain UK Land Law, as or New Zealand Securities Exchange Commission whichever is applicable under the circumstances of Moai Crown State Government 2. The notation "A Security 15 USC" is a flag in Commerce telling the U.S. S.E.C. that a speculation account is being established to enforce a lien. The U.S. S.E.C. can then monitor the process. As long as the process is truthful, open, and above-board (Full disclosure), the U.S. S.E.C. has no jurisdiction over it. For even the U.S. S.E.C. has no jurisdiction over the truth of testimony, depositions, affidavits, and affidavits of obligation (Commercial Liens), and an unrebutted affidavit stands as the truth in Commerce. 3. Legal Authority: Universal moral/existential truths/principles, expressed in Judaic (Mosaic) Orthodox Hebrew/Jewish Commercial Code, corollary to Exodus (chiefly Exodus 20:15, 16). This is the best known Commercial process in America. 4. When an Affidavit is so flagged in Commerce, it becomes a Federal Document because it could become translated into a Security (for example by being attached in support of a Commercial Lien), and not accepting and/or filing a Commercial Affidavit becomes a Federal offense. 5. The Lien Claimant challenges any living soul or corporate soul person s on Title 15 as a basis for Moai Crown State Sovereign Monarch s "Commercial Liens." ALL Commercial processes, by using or relying on notes or paper in Commerce are in British Pound Sterling Notes and Gold Bullion Equivalent values and or Reserve Notes)
91
as MOAI POUND NOTE GOLD CURRENCY, bears British Government UK tracking code, a County Recorders number and or a serial number. Which process must be accessible for inspection at the nearest relevant County Recorders Office or be widely advertised. When a Moai Crown Confederation Lien matures in New Zealand in twenty-one (21) days by default of the Lien Debtor. Through the Lien Debtors failure to rebut MOAI AFFIDAVITS OF OBLIGATION point-for-point categorically, becomes an accounts receivable in the ordinary sense of a collectable debt. Upon which assignments, COLLATERIZATION, and other commercial transactions can be based, hence becomes a Security subject to observation, tracking, and regulation by the Moai Crown State Securities Exchange Commission of Britain UK Land Law, and or New Zealand Securities Exchange Commission (hereinafter N.Z. S.E.C.). Whichever is applicable under Moai State Confederations Congress Governance Administrators of Moai Crown State Government New World Order Moai Sovereigns of Gods World. 6. Speculation Account. The notation "A Security 15 USC" is a flag in Commerce telling the N.Z. S.E.C. that a Moai Crown speculation account is established to enforce Moai Crown liens. The -N.Z. S.E.C. New Zealand Securities Exchange Commission and or British UK Securities Exchange Commission, Australian Securities Exchange Commission, Australian Securities Exchange Commission can then monitor the process. The process is truthful, open, and above-board (Full disclosure), the N.Z. S.E.C. - U.S. S.E.C. - U.K.S.E.C C.A. S.E.C. A.U.S.E.C. have no jurisdiction over MOAI LIENS. Even the U.S. S.E.C. has no jurisdiction over the truth of testimony, depositions, affidavits, and affidavits of obligation (Commercial Liens). Means an Un-rebutted affidavit stands as truth in Commerce. 7. Legal Authority: Moai Crown Jurisdiction of God Moai a Memorial of God himself built by WANOA ROYAL TAHITIAN FAMILY of RAPANUI Tahiti. Universal moral/existential truths/principles, are expressed on Moai Wanoa Royal Tahitian/African Nubian Rock Stone Bible Scriptures Commercial Code, corollary originates from the Black Male African/Tahitian Sun God Ra Stone Obelisk Pyramids and Moai Statue Memorials to God Almighty Directly not of Mans Law but GODS DEVINE LAW. This is the best known Commercial process for Moai Sovereign People of the World membership under Moai Crown Confederation. 8. Doctrines of Gods Earth World Discovery Title- When an Affidavit is so flagged in Commerce, it becomes a Legal Instrument for Moai Confederation of United Sovereign People of Gods Earth World Planet Document Doctrines of Gods World Discovery Title Instructions Stated on the front of this Manual. Because it becomes translated from MOAI GODS Authority into a Security (by being attached in support of a Commercial Lien) not accepting and/or filing a Commercial Affidavit becomes a Moai State offense. Appendix B.4 - Model Criminal Complaint MOAI CROWN STATE CONFEDERATIONS LEGAL ADVOCATS INSTRUCTIONS FOR A "CRIMINAL COMPLAINT" Search for brackets [ ] for modification and changes. THESE ARE to be modified accordingly to individual cases. See Constitutional violations Count 2 for notes. Notes ( ) therein were the basis of the case this latest Criminal Complaint was drawn from. Such comments and notes should be according to the affairs of the case at hand. [Name], person filing the Affidavit of Information [Respondents], persons to whom the Affidavit is against [State], the republic of interest, i.e. [state], Nevada, Utah, New Jersey, New Zealand, Canada, Australia, Britain any Liens relates to etc.
92
[State taxing authority], if your state has a taxing authority attacking you or the state income tax agency, this is what is identified here. On page 3, 4 and other pages are cites for the California Republic penal code, civil code, civil procedure, and government code sections. These are the local (California) requirements for criminal complaints (Affidavits of Information). The sections listed MUST BE CHANGED, as they are the California Code sections. You must locate and replace with the equivalent sections for your state. Search for "Cal" to find and locate such references for changes. MAKE SURE YOU CHANGE ALL OF THEM BEFORE FILING SUCH COMPLAINT to conform to local codes and NOT California. CONFORMS TO NEW ZEALAND- LOCAL LAW CODE COUNT 2 in particular will have to be modified to reflect your state Constitution. California has 37 violations that are listed. There is actually 45, but some vary depending on the action. IT IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE NEW ZEALAND USER OF THIS FILE TO UNDERSTAND HIS/HER OWN MOAI CROWN STATE CONSTITUTION JURISDICTION CAN BE APPLIED. AFTER COMPLETING THE "COMPLAINT," RE-READ IT ALOUD TO HEAR WHAT IS BEING SAID. This accomplishes two things; 1) incorrect grammar can be caught. Fix as required. 2) Items not belonging can be caught, must be removed. THEN set aside for two or three days and repeat the last instruction above. After being removed from such for a couple of days it will all be new and fresh and more "errors" can be caught. Another suggestion is to have another read it after it is completed. Being close to the paper, you know what you want it to say, but it is not exactly as it should be. THIS IS IMPORTANT THAT THE WORDING, INTENT AND MEANING BE CLEAR and NOT CONFUSING. RE-VERIFY ALL CODE SECTIONS TO MAKE SURE THAT THEY ARE ALL RELATED TO YOUR STATE AND NOT ANOTHER. [Name], SUI JURIS c/o [city], [state] Republic <No IRS zone number {ZIP} code> <NOT IN ANY FEDERAL ENCLAVE> The United States district Court For the _____________ district of ______________ [Name], Complainant, VS
RESPONDENTS ______________________________ ) )
93
) ) ) ) NO.____________________ AFFIDAVIT OF INFORMATION FELONIES, HIGH CRIMES and MISDEMEANORS 18 UNITED STATES CODE 4 Federal Rules Criminal Procedure, Rule 3 DEMAND FOR RESOLUTION OF DISPUTE IN COMMERCIAL LAW THIS COMPLAINT AND AFFIDAVIT OF INFORMATION DOES NOT ARISE FROM THE SUBJECT MATTER OF ANY PREVIOUS DISPUTES. AFFIDAVIT OF INFORMATION In support of a CRIMINAL COMPLAINT I, [name], the Complainant Affiant in the instant matter, am reporting, by AFFIDAVIT, to this Court and the United States Attorney, believed to be the competent authorities to which knowledge of criminal actions should be reported. This Affidavit is filed pursuant to 18 United States Code Section 4 (18 USC 4), the FEDERAL RULES OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE, RULE 3. Title 18 (18 USC) Section 4 states: "Whoever, having knowledge of the actual commission of a felony recognizable by a court of the United States, conceals. And does not as soon as possible make known the same to some judge or other person in civil or military authority under the United States, shall be fined not more than $500 or imprisoned not more than three years, or both." Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure Rule 3 states: "The complaint is a written statement of essential facts constituting the offense charged, shall be made upon oath before a magistrate." I, [name], the Complainant Affiant in the instant matter, herein openly declare and depose that the above named Respondents did knowingly and willfully act and conspire to oppress, injure, and damage this Complainant Affiant. As herein below set forth, and by evidences set forth in the attached COMMERCIAL AFFIDAVIT sent to the Respondents/Defendants to resolve the disputed issues outside this forum (a consensual mutually entered into voluntary contract by and between Affiant and accused).
94
The Respondents were previously noticed and warned by the Affiants "COMMERCIAL AFFIDAVIT, NOTICE OF NON-JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS, NOTICE AND WARNING OF COMMERCIAL GRACE" (see Exhibit A), to which the Respondents did not answer/rebut, or answered without addressing the demands made, (see Exhibits... [If any]) In said NOTICE AND WARNING the eternal principles of Commercial Law, the underpinnings of all-human law and civilization, were clearly and simply set forth and explained (clarification of contractual terms). The above referenced Respondent parties failed to avail themselves of the remedies and recourse under Commercial Law to resolve the dispute(s) with this Complainant Affiant in a civil, peaceful and honorable manner. All of the Affidavits, Notices, and filings, of this Complainant Affiant have been issued as the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth, to the best of my experience, knowledge and belief. The Affidavits I have issued were sworn to as TRUE, CORRECT, and COMPLETE. Said Affidavits have never been formally rebutted by affidavits sworn to as TRUE, CORRECT, and COMPLETE by the respective Respondent Parties. By failing to respond to the Complainant Affiant, the Respondents are in contractual default. The Respondents have admitted to and acquiesced to the crimes, which the Complainant Affiant complained about and sought to protect him from further abuses. Their continuing on with the wrongful actions against this Complainant, the accused Respondents are acting in knowledgeable and willful criminal assaults against the Complainant and in knowledgeable and willful breach of contract that they opened. In order for a crime to exist Four elements must exist! First there must be a clearly defined crime or criminal action; Second, there must be a victim; Third that the victim must have been damaged or injured, and Fourth, the criminal intent must be established on the part of the accused. Without proof of all four elements no action can be considered criminal. In this matter, the Complainant Affiant is the victim The Commercial Affidavit sets the complained issues and this Criminal Complaint defines the crimes verifies the actual damages, and the intent was established by proof that the Respondents/Defendants were Noticed and Warned of their wrongs and what was required to right them. Their failing to rebut the Affidavit or prove their own claims, the contractual requirement of this Complainant Affiants Commercial Affidavit of Notice and Warning, the Respondents/ Defendants acted willfully against this Complainant Affiant. The Complainant Affiant exercises his unalienable Sovereign Right against [respondents] Respondents- A legislative entity, and its officers for a redress of grievances (fraud, extortion, theft, plus other noted wrongs). By this verified Criminal Complaint. (California Penal Code Sections 740, 806 and 948 et.seq.) Pursuant to the Commercial instrument of the people known as the Constitution for the State of California, as stated in the Preamble. Article I Sections 1, 3, 24; Article II Section 1; Article III Section 5, 6(d). California Civil Code Section 4, 5, 22.2. California Penal Code Section 9; California Government Code Section 100, 11120. and 54950 as a Sovereign and the parallel sections of the Constitution for the United States, United States Codes Title 18, the United State Criminal Code and the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. Therefore, the Complainant Affiant, [name], sets forth to the candid community the abuses of FELONY, HIGH
95
CRIMES and MISDEMEANORS by the Respondents. The above named Respondents, in the instant action have supported criminal actions by willfully and knowingly: DENIED A RIGHT to due process of law. Such denials include but are not limited to the right to work, the right to receive just reward of labors, denying access to the multiple Constitutional rights and specifically acting against the Complainant Affiant under a color of official right. It is a "taking action" denying the right to personal property violative of the provisions of the state Constitutional provisions and under the Fourth and Fifth Amendments to the Constitution for the United States. RESPONDENT COMMITTED AN ACT OF TREASON AMOUNTING TO A MIXED DOMESTIC WAR CASE SCENARIO 1. The right of due process of law requires before any sort of judgment against an individual, that he has had opportunity to defend himself of any accusation or claim. That he has had an opportunity to state his case, he has had a proper and lawful judgement by a jury of his peers, or by a knowledgeable waiver of the right to answer. The [respondents] officials acted against that due process by acting in a criminal conspiracy to defraud the Complainant Affiant of his property, giving such property to the [state taxing authority] [and/or] the IRS, WITHOUT ANY KIND OF LAWFUL JUDGEMENT, COMMERCIAL PAPERWORK, CONTRACTS OR PROOF OF CLAIMS. [Respondents] are/is therefore guilty of denying the COMPLAINANT AFFIANT [name], every Constitutional protection afforded an act of TREASON (defined below), an act of a MIXED DOMESTIC WAR. 2. DOMESTIC MIXED WAR - A mixed war is one, which is made on one side by public authority and the other by mere private persons. (Blacks Law Dictionary 5th Ed., page 1420). War does not exist merely because of an armed attack by military forces of another nation until it is a condition recognized or accepted by political authority of government, which is attacked. Either through an actual declaration of war or OTHER ACTS DEMONSTRATING SUCH POSITION (emphasis added; Savage v. Sun Life Assur Co. of Canada, D.C. 57 F Supp 620, 621). 3. WAR is the disintegration of peace; Websters states "a state of hostility, conflict or antagonism, a struggle between opposing forces," not necessarily open violent armed confrontations, although a continued state of disrupted peace by any force could lead to open armed conflict. 4. DEFENDANTS are hereby accused of the following crimes against, and violations of the rights of the people of this [state] REPUBLIC. Such rights or obligations are secured, preserved or defined by the Constitution to prevent such abuses by both employer and of government officials by their oaths to support said Constitution (67 CJS, Officers, Section 46, Oaths). 5. MALFEASANCE OF OFFICE By such wrongful action, these individuals have acted with malfeasance of office in conspiracy with Agents of the [state taxing authority] [and/or] [IRS], deliberately, knowingly and willfully violating said rights are guilty of misconduct in office, whether public or private. 6. SLAVERY - The civil relation in which one man has absolute power over the life, fortune, and liberty of another. The Respondents have denied the right to "fortunes" earned by the labors of the Affiant. The unlawful conversion of such property and giving it to another without due process of law, forcing the Affiant to work for less than what was lawfully and contractually agreed upon, breaching interpersonal contracts and relationships,
96
is criminal. The Respondents have absolutely refused to communicate in GOOD FAITH with the Affiant. They have refused to disclose the lawful authority by which they act, the contract in default or the damages which they claim created the so-called liability. There is no judgment of any kind that they can produce showing any liability. By such actions, these have destroyed the right to life, liberty and property by such taking of personal property without due process of law, reducing the Affiant to the condition of a slave. As such, these are in fact in violation of the State and Federal Constitutions that abolished slavery. 7. TREASON -Treason is defined as the assault against the authority to whom one owes allegiance. It is one of three specific crimes named in the United States Constitution. It requires that one commit an act of war against the Constitution, or giving aid and comfort to an enemy. Such clearly defined actions by government officers, and such private officers who have privileged authority in commerce by the Constitution. In regards to specific connection to the above violation, malfeasance of office. Along with violating their oath of office And in the related connected activities herein as listed below is nothing short of TREASON, see DOMESTIC MIXED WAR above, and there is no other term or set of terms that accurately define such activity. [Respondents] have willfully violated the basic fundamental principles this Country was founded on. And therefore condoned the acts of TREASON, By so-called governmental officials against the Undersigned. Making them liable for such acts of TREASON by refusing to stop such actions against the Complainant Affiant [name], when they had the power and authority to do so after being noticed (criminally under Title 18, Section 4; civilly under Title 42, Section 1983, 1985, 1986). In addition to and along with the above-cited crimes, the Respondents acting in concert with such so-called government officials to complete such acts as listed as follows: 8. FRAUD Permitting shown and demonstrated acts of fraud and actively participated in a scheming conspiracy of untruths and misrepresentations to deceive those who entrusted themselves in dealing in good faith, while specifically acting in deliberate bad faith when such fraud was shown (Cal Penal Code Sec. 532; 18 USC 1001). 9. EXTORTION By such actions of Fraud, said Respondents under assumed (usurped) official right and color of office to demand, Without any real lawful or proper authority. Gave monies of the Complainant Affiant to the Internal Revenue Service and/or the [state taxing authority]. As foreign agents (explained below) by use of such misrepresentations and untruths to steal monies under a color and cover of law to raise revenue. (Cal Penal Code Sec 518, 519; 18 USC 872, 873, 1951, 1962) 10. GRAND THEFT By such actions of fraud and extortion, the monies stolen. Or damages sustained by such actions totaled over $400 under a guise of taxes, fines and/or penalties under a color of law for exercising ones inalienable/unalienable rights (Cal Penal Code Sec 487; 18 USC 641 {>$100}, 2112). 11. ROBBERY (Attempted robbery) Respondents, by such action of conspiracy under a color of law and official right, used intimidation, threats, and fear by force of imprisonment to extort revenues (Cal Penal Code Sec. 211; 18 USC 2112). [Note may be added to action if applicable. This is further demonstrated by the act of firing [name] for simply exposing the crimes being perpetrated against him within the Company.] 12. FALSE DOCUMENTS accepting false documents that are known not to be true. Or known to be false to falsely condemn the Complainant Affiant under a color of law without benefit of a lawful trial. To raise revenue, by
97
stealing monies of the Complainant Affiant. And giving it directly to a foreign agent. By such false condemnations (Cal Penal Code Sec 134; 18 USC 1001) 13. CONSPIRACY A confederation of two or more individuals who may not know each other but, by their joint efforts, commit some unlawful or criminal act (Blacks Law Dictionary). Multiple officials, agents and other persons named properly noticed by the attached COMMERCIAL AFFIDAVIT, and un-named who under a cover of official right and appearance and color of law continued to perform such acts to continue to raise revenue by fraud and extortion, for any so-called governmental function. (Cal Penal Code Sec. 182, California Racketeering Act Cal Penal Code Sec. 186; 18 USC 241, Federal Racketeering Act, 18 USC 1961 et. seq.) 14. RACKETEERING. Is the combination of the above-identified crimes. Title 18 United States Codes Section 1961 (RICO) defines it as involving a host of patterned criminal actions that includes but not limited to an act or threat of murder, kidnapping, gambling, arson, and as in the instant case robbery, bribery, extortion, fraud, slavery, etc. The explanation of crimes above stem from other hidden crimes being forced upon the people of this [state] REPUBLIC. Such crimes and this Affidavit of Information is filed in the overall context of the Bankruptcy of the United States (i.e. District of Columbia, as per jurisdiction set forth in the U.S. Constitution Article I, Section 8, clause 17 and 18 and Article IV Section 3 clause 2). The United States bankruptcy is a direct result of the Federal Reserve Act of December 23, 1913. In which the delegated authority of Congress to be responsible for the nations currency was illicitly, unconstitutionally, and treasonously surrendered to the privately owned Federal Reserve Corporation (a foreign agent), whose class A stockholders are various international banks, in place of real money as legal tender. (gold and silver coin U.S. Constitution Article I Section 10. Coinage Act April 2, 1792), the Federal Reserve issued private commercial paper, drawn on the credit of the United States, consisting of only bookkeeping entries of no substance or reality, on which a real compound interest was charged. The U.S. Treasury paid the ever-increasing interest in gold and was eventually depleted, with a higher debt than ever. The planned inevitability occurred: BANKRUPTCY. 15. The explanation of crimes above stem from other hidden crimes being forced upon the people of this [state] Aotearoa New Zealand MOAI CROWN STATE REPUBLIC. Such crimes in this Affidavit of Information is filed in the overall context of the Bankruptcy of New Zealand looming as per Jurisdiction set forth in this GODS LAW LORE MOAI CROWN. New Zealands bankruptcy is a direct result of the Foreign Company HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN IN RIGHT OF -NEW ZEALAND Illegal FRAUD Dealings. In which the delegated authority of New Zealand CROWN CABINET to be responsible and LIABLED for the nations currency was illicitly, unconstitutionally, and treasonously surrendered to the privately owned CROWN New Zealand Government Corporation (a foreign agent), named above whose class stockholders are various international Banks. In place of real money as legal tender (gold and silver coin Coinage), the New Zealand Government issued private commercial paper, drawn on the credit of the State of New Zealand, consisting of only bookkeeping entries of no substance or reality, on which a real compound interest was charged. The N.Z. Treasury is Accountable for any planned inevitable BANKRUPTCY that MOAI CROWN Investigates with this WRIT LIEN CHARGE WARRANT OF ARREST under this section of MOAI CROWN STATE LAND LAW COMMERCIAL LIEN ACTS This bankruptcy was clearly reiterated on March 17, 1993 on the floor of the House of Representatives by James Traficant, Jr. (Ohio) addressing the House. It is recorded in the United States Congressional Record, Wednesday, March 17, 1993, Volume #33, page H1303, should anyone doubt the claim . . .
98
"Mister Speaker. We are here now in Chapter 11. Members of Congress are official trustees presiding over the greatest reorganization of any bankrupt entity in world history, the U. S. Government." 16. The U.S. Attorney General is the "permanent member" to the Secretariat of the Interpol Operation, and the Secretary of Treasury the "alternate permanent member." Under Article 30 of the "Constitution and General Regulation of Interpol," 22 USC 263(a), the agents are required to renounce their allegiance to their respective countries and expatriate. 17. The N.Z. Attorney General of New Zealand is Chris Finlayson is the agent is required to renounce their allegiance to their respective countries and expatriate of the Queen of England. Whereas the Constitution of New Zealand has been tampered with Illegally changed the 1852 Constitution to 1986 as Offense against MOAI CROWN HAPU SOVEREIGN CONFEDERATION 18. Consequently, ALL "public servants," officials, Congressmen, politicians, judges, attorneys, law enforcement personnel, the States and their various agencies, are express agents of the Foreign Principals who have bankrupted and stolen the United States through the paper money banking swindle and other frauds and treacheries. 19. Consequently, ALL "public servants," officials, Congressmen, politicians, judges, attorneys, law enforcement personnel, the States and their various agencies, are express agents of the Foreign Principals who have bankrupted and stolen the -New Zealand States through the paper money banking swindle and other frauds and treacheries. Add to this Section of Complainant Affiant and Lien Claimant, The Queen of England Elizabeth Windsor Accused, Rothschild Banker Evelyn Rothschild, and Black Pope Adolfo Nicolas Pachon. And severally other Accused name Offenders brought before MOAI CROWN Confederation State Court Jurors! Under trappings of "democracy," the flag, "law and order," the Constitution, etc., Americans have been duped into administering and submitting to their own subjugation, bankruptcy, enslavement, and the elimination of their rights, freedom, and country. The people have been reduced to peonage and involuntary servitude under a fraudulent, tyrannical, and seditious foreign oligarchy whose express intent is to institute and establish a dictatorship over the people and their posterity through a private, commercial one-world-government (i.e., "THE NEW WORLD ORDER"). 20. Under the TRUTH democracy, MOAI GOD S MONARCH SOVEREIGN STATE CONFEDERATION REPUBLIC FLAG, "law and order," MOAI HAPU SOVEREIGNTY CONFEDERATION 1835 Declaration of Independence Constitution, Jurisdiction etc. New Zealand Citizens have been duped into administering and submitting to their own subjugation, bankruptcy, enslavement, and the elimination of their rights, freedom, and country. The people have been reduced to peonage and involuntary servitude under a fraudulent, tyrannical, and seditious foreign oligarchy. Whose express intent is to institute and establish a dictatorship over the people and their posterity through a private, commercial one-world-governments ILEGAL ROMANAN CATHOLIC CHURCH FAKE RELIGION FRAUD CORRUPTED PRIVATE CORPORATION BUSINESS. ADMINISTERED THE POPES NEW WORLD ORDER". 21. These Foreign Principals, through the knowing and unknowing complicity of their Agents, have completely debauched the monetary system (National Geographic, January 1993, THE POWER OF MONEY, page 83). Declaring war on and against the people of this country. Destroyed the lives and livelihoods of millions of people. Aided and abetted the enemies of the American, Canadian, Australian, British and New Zealand and Pacific Islands people and their posterity inclusive of these MOAI CROWN LIEN CLAIMS. Incited rebellion and anarchy
99
within the de jure society. Taken false oaths, entered into seditious foreign agreements, pacts, confederations, treaties, and alliances. And under a pretense of "emergency" which they themselves created, and formed a multitude of offices of alien allegiance (treason). To perpetuate their plunder, conquest, and subjugation of what was once considered "the last great hope of human freedom." 22. These are truly guilty of SEDITION AND TREASON against the Constitution and declared a domestic mixed war against the people of the United States. (See attached TOP SECRET "Silent Weapons for Quiet Wars, a Manual for Silent Weapons System," 1980 Article of Scientific American, The World Economy of the Year 2000.) 23. These are truly guilty of SEDITION AND TREASON against MOAI HAPU SOVEREIGN CONFEDERATIONS Constitution and 1835 Declaration of Independent State Flag Jurisdiction and declared a domestic MIXED WAR against the people of the United States, Canadian, Australian, British and New Zealand and Pacific Islands. (See attached TOP SECRET "Silent Weapons for Quiet Wars, a Manual for Silent Weapons System," 1980 Article of Scientific American, The World Economy of the Year 2000.) 24. THEREFORE, the respondents are guilty of the above crimes in acting in conspiracy with such agents of foreign powers to further destroy another individual, [name] the undersigned, by such activity. TO LIEN WRIT, the above named officers of [respondents], did WILLFULLY AND UNLAWFULLY: 25. COUNT 1 USA America on or about [date] accepted and honored a false document by the [state and/or federal taxing authority]. (California Criminal Code Section 125. unqualified statement, a felony; Title 18 USC 1001) of an undocumented, unproven liability, shown to be false by the Complainant Affiant [name], to take property <monies> without due process of law to give it to the Franchise Tax Board. California Penal Code Section 182 (4), (5), Criminal Conspiracy, Sec. 186, Racketeering, Title 18, Sec 241, 1961, 1962. 25. COUNT 2 On or about [date], accepted and honored a false document by the [state and/or federal taxing authority] (New Zealand Criminal Code Section . . . unqualified statement, a felony; Title . . .). Of an undocumented, unproven liability, shown to be false by the Complainant Affiant [name HOANI KAHAKI WANOA], to take property <monies> without due process of law to give it to the Franchise Tax Board. New Zealand Penal Code Section . . . Criminal Conspiracy, Sec. . . . Racketeering, Title . . . Sec . . . 26. COUNT 3 USA America. In accepting and honoring false documentation, [respondents], specifically and willingly conspired with the Internal Revenue Service and/or the [state taxing authority] to steal the property of [name], (expansion but separate count of count 1). Denying [name] the rights of due process of law for any action against him. The rights denied, violated or trespassed are enumerated below. Each action denial, violation or trespass, is a separate high crime or misdemeanor, brought together in this count as violations against the constitution. The penalty is defined under Title 18 USC Sections 3571 individually listed for subtotal tally as to the civil damages sustained by such criminal actions. RIGHTS OF THE SOVEREIGN DENIED OR VIOLATED. As ($100,000 each denied. violated or trespassed right listed as a misdemeanor. 18 USC 3571 defined as a felony is $250,000 for each trespass, denial or violation) secured, preserved and protected by the California Constitution and parallel sections of the Constitution for the United States: 27. COUNT 4 as applied to Accuse named persons, Foreigners, Defendants, Respondents, as MOAI CROWN Debtors living in New Zealand and overseas. In accepting and honoring false documentation, [respondents],
100
specifically and willingly conspired with the Internal Revenue Service IRD and/or the [state taxing authority] to steal the property of [name], (expansion but separate count of count 1). Denying [name] the rights of due process of law for any action against him. The rights denied, violated or trespassed are enumerated below. Each action denial, violation or trespass, is a separate high crime or misdemeanor, brought together in this count as violations against MOAI CROWN constitution. The penalty is defined under Title 18 USC Sections 3571 individually listed for subtotal tally as to the civil damages sustained by such criminal actions. RIGHTS OF THE SOVEREIGN DENIED OR VIOLATED. (USD$100,000 each denied. violated or trespassed right listed as a misdemeanor 18 USC 3571 defined as a felony. is $250,000 for each trespass, denial or violation) secured. Preserved and protected by the California Constitution and parallel sections of the Constitution for the United States: Applied to MOAI CROWN CONFEDERATION SOVEREIGN STATE LAW LAND LAW OF ENGLAND INVESTMENTS 27. COUNT 5 as applied to Accuse named persons, Foreigners, Defendants, Respondents, as MOAI CROWN Debtors living in New Zealand and overseas. In accepting and honoring false documentation, [respondents], specifically and willingly conspired with the ROTHSCHILD BANKS [state government bonds authority] to steal the property of [name], (expansion but separate count of count 1). Denying [name] the rights of due process of law for any action against him. The rights denied, violated or trespassed embezzled, cheated, sold sovereign person s property on the share-market and made money from thin air paper promissory notes at 1000 times over is enumerated below. Each action denial, violation corrupted financial embezzlement, bank scam fraud money property illegal bank finance instrument theft practice or and trespass, is a separate high crime or misdemeanor, brought together in this count as violations against MOAI CROWN constitution. The penalty is defined under Title 18 USC Sections 3571 individually listed for subtotal tally as to the civil damages sustained by such criminal actions. RIGHTS OF THE SOVEREIGN DENIED OR VIOLATED. (USD$100,000 each denied. violated or trespassed right listed as a misdemeanor 18 USC 3571 defined as a felony. is $250,000 for each trespass, denial or violation) secured. Preserved and protected by the California Constitution and parallel sections of the Constitution for the United States: Applied to MOAI CROWN CONFEDERATION SOVEREIGN STATE LAW LAND LAW OF ENGLAND INVESTMENTS 1. ART I SECT I: Denied right of liberty 2. ART I SECT I: Denied right of acquiring property, (property given directly to a foreign agent without due process of law) 3. ART I SECT I: Denied right of possessing property, (property given directly to a foreign agent without due process of law) 4. ART I SECT I: Denied right of defending property, (fired for demanding the proper return of property) 5. ART I SECT I: Denied right of privacy, (giving information to a foreign agent under a guise of law) 6. ART I SECT 2: Denied right of free speech (FIRED for demanding a proper production of certain lawful papers to validate [respondents] of seizing Complainant Affiants monies and giving it to foreign agents) 7. ART I SECT 2: Denied right of free expression of thought, i.e., write, publish, etc. (FIRED for expression of
101
criminal activity in an open forum, expressed in GOOD FAITH) 8. ART I SECT 3: Denied right to redress of grievances (firing an individual for exposing such crime denies a right to redress of grievances in the forum of complaint) 9. ART I SECT 4: Denied right of liberty of conscience, (i.e. punished by being fired for exercising the liberty of conscience) 10. ART I SECT 6: Made the Plaintiff a slave or to serve government involuntarily (for exercising rights not criminal, forced to pay unproven liability, not yielding as a slave to improper and illegal demands) 11. ART I SECT 9: Enforced a bill of attainder, pains and penalties (force to pay an unproven claim by distraint, without due process of law) 12. ART I SECT 9: Enforced an ex post facto law, (NO LAW) 13. ART I SECT 13: ILLEGAL SEIZURE WITHOUT WARRANT TRESPASS (Seized Complainant Affiants property without warrant or lawful complaint of damages) 14. ART I SECT 15: Denied speedy trial DENIED TRIAL JUDGED (fired by the company for exposing and documenting a crime within the company) 15. ART I SECT 15: Denied right of defense witnesses 16. ART I SECT 15: Denied right of assistance of Counsel 17. ART I SECT 15: Denied right of reasonable defense 18. ART I SECT 15: Denied right to confront accuser, injured or damaged party. (Complainant Affiant is the injured party by an undocumented, proven claim against the Complainant Affiant by a foreign agent and not permitted to address such false documentation.) 19. ART I SECT 15: Deprived of liberty (freedom, right of work) 20. ART I SECT 15: Deprived of property without due process of law. (Giving to a foreign agent monies of the Complainant Affiant without a lawful hearing or judgment) 21. ART I SECT 16: Deprived of right of trial by jury, for undefined wrongs, (for which Complainant Affiant was fired) 22. ART I SECT 17: Cruel or unusual punishment (being fired for exposing a crime in the company) 23. ART I SECT 19: Private property taken for public use without just compensation, conversion and theft of compensation for labor. Issue of slavery.
102
24. ART I SECT 23: GRAND JURY, wrongful use, not used. (NO CRIME OR WRONG HAS BEEN PROVEN AGAINST THE COMPLAINANT AFFIANT FOR WHICH SUCH LIABILITY IS CLAIMED, AND PUNISHED FOR EXERCISE OF RIGHTS) 25. ART I SECT 24: Denied right of due process 26. ART I SECT 24: Denied right of equal protection 27. ART I SECT 24: Denied speedy trial and public trial 28. ART I SECT 24: Denied right of defense witnesses 29. ART I SECT 24: Denied right of assistance of Counsel 30. ART I SECT 24: Denied right of reasonable defense 31. ART I SECT 24: Denied right to confront accuser, injured or damaged party 32. ART I SECT 24: Denied right to be free of unreasonable search and seizures (willfully taking of compensation and willfully giving it to another without proper warrant of paperwork proving liability) 33. ART I SECT 24: Cruel or unusual punishment (being fired for exposing crimes in the company) 34. ART I SECT 26: DELIBERATE, WILLFUL VIOLATION, DENIAL and REJECTION OF MANDATORY AND PROHIBITORY PROVISIONS OF THE CONSTITUTION. 35. ART I SECT 28: Denied defense evidence 36. ART II SECT 1: Usurpation of Political power (acting in Conspiracy with the Franchise Tax Board and IRS agents, outside the lawful adjudication procedure of courts) 37. ART III SECT 6: Denied right of action in the Courts before acting against the Complainant Affiant. (Being found guilty of an undefined crime punished without due process and fired for complaining about such abuses before any action is commenced.) There are Thirty-seven (37) actions of high crimes and misdemeanors in a single count of conspiracy. All are listed as misdemeanors ($100,000). An elected official in government doing these things would be charged as felonys ($250,000), MOAI CROWN CHARGES 18 USC 3571. Subtotal of damages in Count 2: $9,250,000 (37 x $250,000) [IRS and [state taxing authority] can be separate counts or separate cases if desired. Separate counts by governmental agencies is charged as felonies.] COUNT 6: On or about [date], [respondents], freely and willfully gave the [[IRS] [state taxing authority]]
103
$[amount], an act of conversion, and theft, without proper lawful paperwork, authorization, or Court judgement. California Penal Code Section 211; 18 USC 2112, a felony [Repeat, as many times as there were illegal transfers by date and amount for each agency separately]. [And if applicable or some variance thereof] COUNT 7: On or about [date], [respondents], fully and willfully ignored proper notices (Complainant Affiants COMMERCIAL AFFIDAVIT and Notice of Commercial Grace, attached) of a crime taking place, compounding the crimes, by [i.e. example: firing Complainant Affiant for exposing such crimes to management against the Claimant by Franchise Tax Board]. Such action caused a permanent loss of work, a damage of $[compensation] for at least 5 years (former compensation increased 5% each year for 5 years), being denied work by others because of such action firing. California Penal Code Section 153 compounding crimes; Section 182 a criminal conspiracy; Section 186 Racketeering. Civil penalty is defined in 18 USC 1964 triple damages. MOAI CHARGES By such repeated actions by [respondents] and the [IRS] [and/or] [state taxing agency] Agents, a criminal conspiracy is established of fraud, extortion, theft and RACKETEERING and acts of SEDITION AND TREASON. MOAI CROWN LIEN CLAIM WARRANTS The specified penalty (civil) damages for crimes committed are as listed on the TABLE OF CRIMES on the following pages, drawn from the civil penalties as specified in the Criminal Codes. Undefined crimes (Constitutional violations not listed in the Criminal Code) are set by Title 18, United States Criminal Code Sections 3571. Felonies are set at $250,000 and misdemeanors at $100,000 for each offense. By each officer or official, Accounting of damages are tallied as follows: [Format document so the following remains all on one page] ACCOUNTING LEVY OF DAMAGES SUSTAINED PARTIAL TABLE OF CRIMES ALL IN US DOLLARS AT THE TIME OF THIS MOAI LIEN CLAIM ARREST WARRANT COUNT 8: Nature of crime 1. FRAUD $***10,000 Damage Penalty 18 USC 1001 Authority of damages
2. EXTORTION [# of counts of GRAND THEFT from count 3 (Felony) (18 USC 2112) no.x $250,000 $****5,000 $********* 18 USC 872 18 USC 3571, 3623 3. CONSPIRACY $***10,000 18 USC 241 18 USC 1963
4. RACKETEERING (Criminal) $***25,000 SUBTOTAL $*********
5. RACKETEERING (Civil) [Lost salary, lost pay, monies from bank account, credit union, whatever the ACTUAL
104
DAMAGES are that can be proven multiple by 3 triple damages.] $[Amount] x3 = $[total amount] 18 USC 1964 [Block may be broken here is necessary] ********* COUNT 9: 37 Constitutional violations From Count 2... $9,250,000 Partial Table totals... $********** Racketeering civil penalties.. $[Salary and other actual damages] GRAND TOTAL OF DAMAGES $[add the above] ********* [End of block for one page] The undersigned Complainant Affiant, [name], declares under penalties of bearing a false witness, that the complaint as stated herein is true, correct and certain, now a matter of public record, a standard operating procedure of the [IRS] [state taxing authority] and the conspiracy demonstrated, by personal experience. (exhibits attached) COUNT 10: Exhibits: COMMERCIAL AFFIDAVIT [Other exhibits; i.e., of off-point no responses] DATED: _____________________________ [Name] Complainant Affiant [Below this point - Notary item should all be on one page.] WITNESS my hand this ______day of _________________, 1993 /s/___________________________ [Name], SUI JURIS STATE OF [state] COUNTY OF ) ) )
:ss
105
On this ______day of ______________, 1993, before me, ___________________________, the undersigned Notary Public in and for the State of [state], appeared __________________________, ( ) personally known to me, ( ) or proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence, to be the person whose name is subscribed within this instrument and acknowledged to me that he executed the same in his authorized capacity(ies), and that his signature on this instrument is true, correct and certain. Witness my hand and official seal: SEAL OF NOTARY /s/______________________________ SIGNATURE OF NOTARY PUBLIC Appendix B.5 - Coloring Agreement This agreement can be used to establish the Constitution and the Bill of Rights as "colorable law" between you and a government official. It is more likely to be effective against an administrative or executive employee than a judge or a high elected official. To the former, the amounts of money involved are significant. The latter may be rich enough to regard this agreement as a minor nuisance. PRESENTER (Your name) (Your address) PRESENTEE (Government officials name) (Agencys address) COUNT 11: AGREEMENT 1. I, [government official], presentee, here agree to accord to the presenter, [your name], the rights, per ARS 471201.36 [or UCC 1-201(36)] declared in the four referenced documents as a limitation upon myself and my agents, per ARS 47-2209.A [or UCC 2-209(a)]: a. Constitution for the state of _________ b. Constitution for the United States of America c. Declaration of Independence d. English Bill of Rights of 1688 2. These four documents constitute a statement of the colorable law between the above two parties per ARS 471105.A [or UCC 1-105(a)], and amend any previously existing agreements between the parties ab initio, per ARS 47-2207 [or UCC 2-207]. 3. No provision of this agreement or the rights thereof shall be deemed waived by a waiver of a breach upon the agreement. There is no waiver of punitive damages.
106
4. Presenter reserves choice of law, including actions in law or equity, Federal law civil rights actions (either in state or Federal court, lien and lis pendens, for either a breach of this agreement, or for continuing dishonor of this agreement. 5. Presentee waives any right of removal to Federal court if a state court action is instituted upon a breach of this agreement. Should this provision be unenforceable, presentee agrees to removal/remand to the U.S. Court of Federal Claims. 6. No immunity shall attach to the violator of the above rights (see Hafer v. Melo, 112 S.Ct. 358 (1991)) and per Article 2, Section 31 of the Constitution for the State of Arizona. 7. SCHEDULE a. Violation of the above rights, including dishonor of this presentment, shall be valued at $1,000 per violation or actual damages, whichever is more, for each such act violative. b. Violation causing arrest or imprisonment shall be valued at $10,000 per violation or actual damages, whichever is more, for each such act violative. COUNT 12: NOTICE OF LIEN 8. Invasions of the above-denominated rights shall act as a lien upon the nonexempt property of the presentee as follows: a. Nonexempt household goods; and b. Real estate; and c. Future earnings; and d. Other personal property COUNT 12: NOTICE OF PROPOSED DISPOSITION OF COLLATERAL 9. If, after 90 days from the claim on a breach on the above agreement, payment is not received by the presenter, action may be commenced without further notice and presentee will be deemed to have consented to such action as a collection on an account. __/__/__ ___________________ __/__/__ ________________________ presenter/creditor presentee/debtor INSTRUCTIONS TO PRESENTEE Sign, date, copy and return by first class mail to the presenter within three days of your receipt. MAILED to presentee: 1st time on __/__/__ 2nd time on __/__/__ 3rd time on __/__/__
107
COUNT 14: EXAMPLE OF A COMMERCIAL LIEN, PURSUANT TO THE COLORING AGREEEMENT Secretary of State State of _______ _____________ ) Creditor ) Commercial Lien v. ) UCC 9-401(a)(3) _____________ Merchant debtor Debtor was presented on __/__/__ with the attached agreement. It was not timely dishonored. On __/__/__ debtor breached the contract by the following acts: 1... On __/__/__ demand was made and no payment was forthcoming. Lienor is due $______ and the subject of the lien is the personal property, household goods, real estate and future earnings of the above debtor. The foregoing is a true, correct and complete statement made under penalty of perjury. (date, signature, jurat and notary seal) COUNT 13: Appendix B.6 - Phil Marshs Lien on the U.S. Government In the Office of the County Recorder State of California The County of San Joaquin Phillip Marsh; and the Citizens of the United States IE; (Does 1-250,000,000), Lien Claimants V. President of the United States George Bush; Reserve Bank, Alan Greenspan, Chairman; and Shirley Peterson, Commissioner, Internal Revenue Service. Lien Debtors (Severally and Jointly Liable)
108
A SECURITY (15 U.S.C.) Claim of Commercial Lien and Affidavit COUNT 14: - EXEMPLARY To Guarantee Bond on Performance of All Public Officials, Officers of the United States, (Including Congress) Who, By Association or Directive Are Connected In Any Way To The Federal Emergency Martial Law Act. And The Federal Reserve Bank, A Private Corporation The United States Congress; The Federal Alan Greenspan, Chairman of the Board. I, Phillip Marsh depose and affirm and state as follows: The parties of this Commercial Lien are cited on this page and page 4 attached. All processes are those in which Constitutional and Commercial Rights have been abridged and denied. Nothing has been provided to Lien Claimants by any Public Official or Officer (Including Congress) Associated or by directive in connection with The Federal Emergency Martial Law Act. The New World Order, or the Federal Reserve Bank, to demonstrate or prove that they are Commercially Bonded to operate any Processes which abridges or denies any Commercial provision of the United States Constitution or the California State Constitution. COUNT 15: This Commercial Lien is commercially necessary to guarantee for both the Lien Claimants and the public in general. (Does 1 - 250,000,000) that such bond does exist upon said Officials and Officers. (Including Congress, Federal Reserve Bank, and Alan Greenspan. Chairman of the Board) and is not placed for any other reason or harassment of persons or processes; and, That the Federal Emergency Martial Law Act will be disbanded immediately; and That The New World Order proposed by President Bush shall be immediately negated; and, That The United States Constitution shall be returned as the Law of the Land to the People; and, That the Federal Reserve Bank, A Private Corporation immediately disband the Internal Revenue Service as the collection arm for those taxes; and, That The Federal Reserve Bank be disbanded as the "Controller" of The United States Monetary System; and, That the United States Monetary System be reinstated under the authority of The United States Congress, as was intended by The Constitution of The United States. COUNT 16: The cited Lien Debtors are being liened for a minimum of $10,000 each. By each of the Lien Claimants for a total in excess of $2,500,000,000,000.00 Which was arrived at by using the $10,000 multiplied by 250,000,000 citizens based on and pursuant to Title 18 USC 241 of the United States Code, for violations of the
109
United States Constitution and Constitutional Rights. Including the Seventh Amendment of the Bill of Rights, which guarantees a jury trial in all Commercial processes. Additionally, an approximation of thirty-five (35) Civil Rights violations, i.e., other Commercial provision of The United States Constitution MOAI CROWN Apply this. COUNT 17: This Commercial Lien is intended to notify, through recording, that all real and movable property of the aforementioned shall be seized from the cited Lien Debtors. And seized from those yet to be named as Lien Debtors. This property is being seized as a pledge that the specifics as requested are adhered to, and to secure a portion of the above-cited specifications and obligations as declared. And to apply it as a bond lien arrest warrants seizure of property on the persons and activities of the Officials, Officers. (Including Congress), Federal Reserve Bank (Alan Greenspan, Chairman of the Board), and other such Lien Debtors as may be added from time to time, for whatever relevant and just Commercial Agreements. COUNT 18: Lis Pendens Lien. This Commercial Lien is not a Lis Pendens Lien, therefore it may not be removed or dissolved by any other parties except the Lien Claimants or a Common Law Jury properly convened and used to settle the claimants cause. COUNT 19: Lien Debtors. Additionally, those named and unnamed Lien Debtors, who may be added from time to time, for whatever relevant and just Commercial Agreements, would also be relevant to the aforementioned. COUNT 20: List of Lien Debtors: 1. President of the United States George Bush, 2. The United States Congress, 3. The Federal Reserve Bank A Private Corporation, and 4. Alan Greenspan, Chairman, 5. Shirley Peterson, Commissioner, Internal Revenue Service all persons connected now and in the future severally and jointly liable. Affirmed and respectfully submitted this 30th day of September, 1992 S/ Phillip Marsh State of California County of San Joaquin I, Phillip Marsh, being first duly sworn, say I am the claimant so named. I have read the foregoing claim and know the contents thereof and believe the same to be just and correct. Subscribed and affirmed/sworn to me, a Notary Public, this 30th day of September, 1992. Notary Public in and for The State of California, residing at Stockton, California S/Robert Murray My commission expires: 12-6-1995 Appendix B.7 - Nelson Starrs Lien on Judges and IRS Agents This is the lien that the President of the Florida Bar Association could find no way to extinguish. Notice the
110
brevity of this lien. This may be a key to its strength. - IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER STATE OF FLORIDA PALM BEACH COUNTY Nelson E. Starr, Lien Claimant v. William P. Barr, Roberto Martinez, Shirley D. Peterson, William J. Zloch, Norman C. Roettoer, Jr., Dennis Felton, Richard Jarvis, John Morrell, Richard L. Kauff, and All Persons and Others Listed; A SECURITY (15 U.S.C.) CLAIM OF COMMERCIAL LIEN AND AFFIDAVIT EXTENDED TO MOAI CROWN LIENS COUNT 21: To Guarantee Bond on the Specific Performance of and by All public Officials, Officers of the Court, and Title Insurance Companies Connected with this Cause of Action Consisting of Court Case: No. 92-14134 CIVREHOE I, Nelson E. Starr, depose and say as follows: 1. The parties of the Commercial Lien are cited in the following "List of Lien Debtors," where they are identified in the Official Capacities. 2. All processes in the above-cited case have been summary processes in which the Constitutional and commercial right to jury trial has been abridged and denied. All other supporting processes have likewise been summary processes. 3. Nothing has been provided by any public official or officer of the court in the above cited case to demonstrate or prove that they are commercially bonded to operate any summary processes which abridge or deny any commercial provision of the United States Constitution or the Florida state Constitution. 4. This commercial lien is commercially necessary to guarantee for both the lien claimant and the public in general that such a bond will exist upon the said officials and officers of the court and is not placed for any reason of harassment of persons or processes. 5. The cited Lien Debtors are being liened for a minimum of $350,000.00 each, based on Title 18, Section 241, of the United States Code for violation of United States Constitutional Rights. Including the Seventh Amendment of the Bill of Rights, guaranteeing a jury trial in all commercial processes and approximately 35 other commercial provisions of the United States Constitution.
111
COUNT 22: This commercial lien is intended to seize all the real and movable property of the above-cited Lien Debtors and those on the attached extended list of Lien Debtors. This property is being seized as a pledge to secure the above cited obligation declared in paragraphs 2, 3, and 4. To apply it as a bond on the persons and activities of the officials, officers of the court, title insurance companies, and other such Lien Debtors as may be added from time to time for whatever relevant and just commercial agreement. COUNT 23: This commercial lien is not a lis pendens lien. It may not be removed or dissolved by any parties except the Lien Claimants or a common-law jury properly convened and used. Affirmed and respectfully submitted this 11th day of August 1992. /s/ Nelson E. Starr FDL 5360-625-47-204 AFFIDAVIT State of Florida ) County of Palm Beach ) ss:
Nelson E. Starr, being first duly sworn, says, I am the claimant above named. I have read the foregoing claim and know the contents thereof, and believe the same to be just. Subscribed and sworn to before me this 11th day of August 1992. Notary Public COUNT 24: LIST OF LIEN DEBTORS: William P. Barr Roberto Martinez William J. Zloch Norman C. Roettoer, Jr. Shirley D. Peterson B. Phillips Michael D. Allen Merlin W. Heye Frank Turner Steven Vecchione Dennis Felton Richard Jarvis John Morrell Richard L. Kauff, United States Attorney General U.S. Attorney for Southern District of Florida
112
United States District Court Judge United States District Court Judge Commissioner, Internal Revenue Service IRS Tax Attorney, Trial Division IRS Director, District Center, Atlanta IRS District Director, Ft. Lauderdale IRS Group Manager, West Palm Beach IRS Chief, Advisory Unit (Lien/Levy) Ft. Lauderdale IRS Revenue Officer IRS Revenue Officer IRS Special Agent President Kauffs of Palm Beach, Inc. And all persons connected with the case now and in the future severally and jointly liable. Appendix B.8 - Model Commercial Lien This example is based upon California statutes. You must change all legal citations to suit your own situation. RECORDING REQUESTED BY [Name1] AND WHEN RECORDED MAIL TO: [Name1] <No IRS zone number [ZIP CODE > <Not in any federal enclave> SPACE ABOVE THIS LINE FOR RECORDERS USE ================================================================= CLAIM OF LIEN THIS CLAIM OF LIEN IS FILE PURSUANT CALIFORNIA CIVIL CODE 2872, 2874, 2875, 2881(1), 2883, and 2889, against Lien Debtor(s) for default and breach of contract under commercial law. Section 3281 of Civil Code for damages sustained. California Government Code 27297.5 and 27387 as an involuntary lien based on consensual actions by knowledgeable breach of contract (explained herein). THIS IS NOT A LIS PENDENS LIEN. LIEN DEBTOR: [Name2]
113
This CLAIM OF LIEN (Affidavit of Obligation) is a Consensual Lien/Obligation on the part of the Lien Debtor(s), arising out of a private contract formed between LIEN CLAIMANT and LIEN DEBTOR (S). Lien Debtor initiated said contract by claims asserted against Lien Claimant. LIEN CLAIMANT responded to LIEN DEBTOR by a COMMERCIAL AFFIDAVIT and subsequently a NOTICE OF DEFAULT enumerating the position of LIEN CLAIMANT. Proclaiming claims of LIEN DEBTOR to be in error and criminal, and demanding a point-for-point rebuttal by LIEN DEBTOR. And proof of basis for his alleged cause of action against LIEN CLAIMANT within thirty (30) days or abate all action against LIEN CLAIMANT, in which failure to rebut Lien Debtor(s) was (were) put on notice that they would be in default. Subject COMMERCIAL AFFIDAVIT sworn true, correct and complete was sent by LIEN CLAIMANT, [name1] to LIEN DEBTOR(s), [name2], by United States Postal Service, Certified Mail, Return Receipt Requested # [number] on [date] LIEN DEBTOR received said AFFIDAVIT, without signing the certified mail receipt on or about [date]. LIEN DEBTOR failed to respond to AFFIDAVIT/NOTICE, thereby admitting and acquiescing to the declarations by LIEN CLAIMANT, a NOTICE OF DEFAULT was served upon them on [date] by United States Postal Service, Certified Mail, Return Receipt Requested # [number]. Such default admits that the LIEN DEBTORS claim was false and fraudulent and that LIEN DEBTOR (S) was (were) guilty of the criminal violations. Involved in the action of LIEN DEBTOR as set forth in LIEN CLAIMANTS COMMERCIAL AFFIDAVIT and NOTICE OF DEFAULT and subsequently charged in a CRIMINAL COMPLAINT (AFFIDAVIT OF INFORMATION), given to the United States District Court and the United States Attorney on [date] for LIEN DEBTOR actions. "Due process requires, at a minimum, that an individual be given a meaningful opportunity to be heard prior to being subjected by force of law to a significant deprivation . . . . That the hearing required by due process is subject to waiver. and is not fixed in form does not affect its root requirement that an individual. Be given an opportunity for a hearing before he is deprived of any significant property interest . . . (Original italics; 401 US 378- 379) Randone v. Appellate Department, 1971, 5 C3d 536, 550. "In the latter case [Mullane v. Central Hanover Trust Co., 339 U.S. 306]. We said that the right to be heard has little reality or worth unless one is informed that the matter is pending and can choose for himself whether to appear or default, acquiesce or contest. 339 U.S. at 314" Sniadach v. Family Finance Corp., 395 U.S. 337, 339, 340 In the absence of a response, when the LIEN DEBTOR was given an opportunity to respond, the LIEN CLAIMANT [name1] hereby inserts and records this CLAIM OF LIEN against LIEN DEBTOR. [Name2], jointly and severally in the total amount of [amount spelled out ($0.00)], said moneys to be paid in coin minted by the United States Mint, 31 USC 5112 Dollars. Said CLAIM OF LIEN is in the amount of criminal fines, penalties, and damages enumerated in a CRIMINAL COMPLAINT (AFFIDAVIT OF INFORMATION), received by the United States Attorney and United States Magistrate, which total ledger amount is secured by the real and personal community property of LIEN DEBTOR as follows: PERSONAL, REAL and MOVABLE PROPERTY OF AT [address] save that of LIEN DEBTOR S wedding rings. This CLAIM OF LIEN is filed pursuant the California Codes and the Fundamental Commercial Law that has existed nearly 2,000 years:
114
"The ability to place a lien upon a mans property, such as to temporarily deprive him of its beneficial use, without any judicial determination of probable cause dates back not only to medieval England but also to Roman times." United States Supreme Court, 1968, Sniadach v. Family Finance Corp., 395 U.S. 337, 349 Supported by the California Supreme Court, 1971, Randone v. Appellate Department, 5 C3d 536, 96 Cal Rptr 709 and 488 P2d 13.___________________________________________________________________, to command specific performance of LIEN DEBTOR(s) and to impound their property(s) for claims of obligation for non-performance, default in Commercial Law, malfeasance of office, violation of oath of office, violation of trust, engaging in unbonded acts, and numerous other crimes and offenses cited in the AFFIDAVIT OF INFORMATION (Criminal Complaint) presented to the United States Magistrate and United States Attorney. This CLAIM OF LIEN is filed against [name2], LIEN DEBTOR and spouse. Including all Community Property of both, in order to prevent their evasion of financial liability through efforts to shield property and assets by placing said property and assets in their spouses names to prevent attachment for the satisfaction of suits and liens. CLAIMANT Signed: ________________________ Dated: [name1] WITNESS my hand this ______day of _________________, 1993 /s/___________________________ [name1] STATE OF CALIFORNIA :ss COUNTY OF _______________ On this ______day of ______________, 1993. Before me the undersigned Notary Public in and for the State of California, appeared ___________________________, (.) personally known to Me. or (.) approved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence. to be the person whose signature appears in the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he executed it. Witness my hand and official seal: /s/______________________________
115
NOTARY PUBLIC [Home] [Report Directory] http://www.buildfreedom.com Moai Gods Superior Customary Law Legal Advocate Monarch Supreme Sovereign Assignee Author and Editor Hoani Kahaki Wanoa. Patent Property Rights Administered under Moai Crown State Confederation Hoani Wanoa Sovereign Monarch from God-Moai. Sections of this Manual forms the basis of MOAI CROWN SOVEREIGN MONARCH LEGAL ACTS OF MOAI STATE LAW AFFIDAVIT: I HOANI KAHAKI WANOA swears to GOD ALMIGHTY the MOAI GODS GRACE AUTHORITY RULER of Heaven and Earth. State here my Solemn and Sovereigns TRUTH so help me GOD my Statements are HONEST and TRUE. Within the Contents of this Manual for Political, Financial, Economical, Lawful purposes that are CITATIONS in all LEGAL MOAI CROWN COMMERCIAL LIEN DEBT RECOVERY ARREST WARRANTS for various LEGAL JURY COURT CASES and any Applicable CLASS ACTION or Individual Cases under MOAI CROWN and MOAI GODS LAW LORE Signed NOTARY PUBLIC Dated on 3 May 2013 From: John Wanoa <moaienergy@gmail.com> To: amy.adams@parliament.govt.nz, jim.anderton@parliament.govt.nz, jacinda.ardern@parliament.govt.nz, shane.ardern@parliament.govt.nz, chris.auchinvole@parliament.govt.nz, kanwaljit.singh.bakshi@parliament.govt.nz, rick.barker@parliament.govt.nz, carol.beaumont@parliament.govt.nz, david.bennett@parliament.govt.nz, loren.bolton@parliament.govt.nz, jackie.blue@parliament.govt.nz, chester.borrows@parliament.govt.nz, john.boscawen@parliament.govt.nz, simon.bridges@parliament.govt.nz, g.brownlee@ministers.govt.nz, brendon.burns@parliament.govt.nz, chchcentral@parliament.govt.nz, Yvette.mckinley@parliament.govt.nz, hilary.calvert@parliament.govt.nz, chris.carter@parliament.govt.nz, labourwest@xtra.co.nz, d.carter@ministers.govt.nz, steve.chadwick@parliament.govt.nz, charles.chauvel@parliament.govt.nz, ashraf.choudhary@parliament.govt.nz, trina.randell@parliament.govt.nz, greenmps.auckland@greens.org.nz, j.coleman@ministers.govt.nz, j.collins@ministers.govt.nz, office@judithcollins.co.nz, clayton.cosgrove@parliament.govt.nz, david.cunliffe@parliament.govt.nz, clare.curran@parliament.govt.nz, lianne.dalziel@parliament.govt.nz, Kelvin.davis@parliament.govt.nz, Jacqui.dean@parliament.govt.nz, Catherine.delahunty@parliament.govt.nz, roger.douglas@parliament.govt.nz, p.dunne@ministers.govt.nz, electjville@xtra.co.nz, ruth.dyson@parliament.govt.nz, b.english@ministers.govt.nz, Shona.robb@parliament.govt.nz, darien.fenton@parliament.govt.nz, c.finlayson@ministers.govt.nz, teururoa.flavell@parliament.govt.nz, c.foss@ministers.govt.nz, aaron.gilmore@parliament.govt.nz,
116
p.goff@parliament.govt.nz, jo.goodhew@parliament.govt.nz, sandra.goudie@national.org.nz, Kennedy.graham@parliament.govt.nz, tim.groser@parliament.govt.nz, nathan.guy@ministers.govt.nz, national.horowhenua@xtra.co.nz, national.kapiti@xtra.co.nz, kevin.hague@parliament.govt.nz, Hone.harawira@parliament.govt.nz, george.hawkins@parliament.govt.nz, john.hayes@parliament.govt.nz, p.heatley@ministers.govt.nz, tau.henare@parliament.govt.nz, r.hide@ministers.govt.nz, rodney@epsom.org.nz, chris.hipkins@parliament.govt.nz, janette.granville@xtra.co.nz, pete.hodgson@parliament.govt.nz, pete@petehodgson.co.nz, parekura.horomia@parliament.govt.nz, ikaroa.gis@xtra.co.nz, ikaroa.hstgs@xtra.co.nz, gareth.hughes@parliament.govt.nz, Raymond.huo@parliament.govt.nz, paul.hutchison@parliament.govt.nz, hunua.electorate@xtra.co.nz, shane.jones@parliament.govt.nz, shanejonesmp@xtra.co.nz, s.joyce@ministers.govt.nz, rahui.katene@parliament.govt.nz, nikki.kaye@parliament.govt.nz, sue.kedgley@parliament.govt.nz, j.key@ministers.govt.nz, genelle@johnkey.mp.net.nz, A.King@parliament.govt.nz, kilbirnieeo@xtra.co.nz, colin.kingmp@xtra.co.nz, melissa.lee@parliament.govt.nz, Iain.lees-galloway@parliament.govt.nz, graham@iainleesgallowaymp.org, keith.locke@parliament.govt.nz, peseta.sam.lotu-iiga@parliament.govt.nz, sam4maungakiekie@parliament.govt.nz, tim.macindoe@parliament.govt.nz, moana.mackey@labour.org.nz, nanaia.mahuta@parliament.govt.nz, tainuielectorate@xtra.co.nz, trevor.mallard@parliament.govt.nz, WOAoffice@xtra.co.nz, petone.eo@clear.net.nz, w.mapp@ministers.govt.nz, todd.mcclay@parliament.govt.nz, m.mccully@ministers.govt.nz, murray.mccully@xtra.co.nz, sue.moroney@parliament.govt.nz, waikatohub.mps@xtra.co.nz, stuart.nash@parliament.govt.nz, russel.norman@parliament.govt.nz, Phil.Major@parliament.govt.nz, hekia.parata@ministers.govt.nz, david.parker@parliament.govt.nz, allan.peachey@parliament.govt.nz, ritchie.wards@parliament.govt.nz, lynne.pillaymp@xtra.co.nz, s.power@ministers.govt.nz, simonpower.feilding@xtra.co.nz, simonpower.marton@xtra.co.nz, rajen.prasad@parliament.govt.nz, paul.quinn@parliament.govt.nz, angela.bray@parliament.govt.nz, jen.toogood@parliament.govt.nz, office@grantrobertson.co.nz, ross.robertson@parliament.govt.nz, rae.waterhouse@xtra.co.nz, michael.clatworthy@xtra.co.nz, caroline.mitchell-lowe@parliament.govt.nz, BotanyMP@parliament.govt.nz, eric.roy@parliament.govt.nz, Heather.Roy@parliament.govt.nz, t.ryall@ministers.govt.nz, Carmel.sepuloni@parliament.govt.nz, heather.henderson@parliament.govt.nz, Pita.Sharples@parliament.govt.nz, david.shearer@parliament.govt.nz, info@mtalbertlabour.co.nz, sua.william.sio@parliament.govt.nz, beryl.bright@parliament.govt.nz, mp.rodney.warkworth@xtra.co.nz, n.smith@ministers.govt.nz, nick@nick4nelson.co.nz, maryan.street@parliament.govt.nz, lindsay.tisch@parliament.govt.nz, Tisch.tekauwhata@xtra.co.nz, tolleywhk@xtra.co.nz, tolleygis@xtra.co.nz, chris.tremain@national.org.nz, napier.electorate@airnet.net.nz, metiria.turei@parliament.govt.nz, greenmps.dunedin@greens.org.nz, t.turia@ministers.govt.nz, Tari.Turia@xtra.co.nz, phil.twyford@parliament.govt.nz, gabrielle.stewart@parliament.govt.nz, Upston.taupo@parliament.govt.nz, Upston.sthwaikato@parliament.govt.nz, Upston.cambridge@parliament.govt.nz, nicky.wagner@parliament.govt.nz, Apirana.dawson@parliament.govt.nz, k.wilkinson@ministers.govt.nz, waimakariri@xtra.co.nz, m.williamson@ministers.govt.nz, Michael.woodhouse@parliament.govt.nz, blueandgold@parliament.govt.nz, jonathan.young@parliament.govt.nz, sae@medianet.dz, saemb.ang@netangola.com, saconsp@terra.com.br, saemb@solar.com.br, yaounde@foreign.gov.za, info@embajada-sudafrica.cl, gicaltd@racsa.co.cr, ambafsudpol@aviso.ci, rsacuba@ceniai.inf.cu, sapragueadmin@nextra.cz, reortiz@ecnet.ec, saegabon@internetgabon.com, ileana.coronado@gmail.com, bmemb@globalnet.hn, sacghgk@netvigator.com, saemb@sa-embassy.hu, vanwykd@foreign.gov.za, dha@kasnet.com, antananarivo@foreign.gov.za, sahc@intnet.mu, admin@embajadasudafrica.com.mx, sudaf@menara.ma, sahc@tropical.co.mz, safrica@nigol.net.ng, sahcabuja@yahoo.co.uk, cralaw@cwpanama.net, general.peru@foreign.gov.za, manila@foreign.gov.za, saedha@supmedia.pl, mlopasov@jacsk.jnj.com, janez.pergar@kompas.si, saembdam@tarassul.sy, consular@sahc-tz.com, general@southafricahouse.com, safem@netgate.com.uy, mtimcke@bbc.com.uz, inquiries@un.org, mail@icj-cij.org, unsco@palnet.com, uncompensationlondonuk@w.cn, InfoDesk@ohchr.org,
117
daniel.hannan@europarl.europa.eu, nigel.farage@europarl.europa.eu, richardjames.ashworth@europarl.europa.eu, info@sharonbowles.org.uk, keithtaylor@greenmeps.org.uk, office@nirjdeva.com, marta.andreasenoffice@europarl.europa.eu, james.elles@europarl.europa.eu, southeast@peterskinnermep.eu, catherine@bearder.eu, editor@reuters.com, editor@dominion.co.nz, editorial@stuff.co.nz, egypt@un.int, eplondonpress@europarl.org.uk, Fred.Hawrysh@thomsonreuters.com, Francis.Cooke@justice.govt.nz, info@gisborneherald.co.nz, info@maoritelevision.com, info@ngatiporou.com, info@worldenergyresearch.com, j.campbell@tv3.co.nz, jason.moon@radionz.co.nz, jared.savage@heraldonsunday.co.nz, jock@truth.co.nz, harratt@theaucklander.co.nz, joseph.luke@waatea603am.co.nz, koia@xtra.co.nz, LBSPG@nzfilm.co.nz, letters@star-times.co.nz, m.lush@radiolive.co.nz, martincrump@radioworks.co.nz, hlinfo@parliament.uk, HCinfo@parliament.uk, public.enquiries@hm-treasury.gov.uk, pcosecretariat@pco.x.gov.uk, leader@commonsleader.x.gsi.gov.uk, general.queries@justice.gsi.gov.uk, enquiry@dfid.gov.uk, correspondence@decc.gsi.gov.uk, correspondenceunit@attorneygeneral.gsi.gov.uk, haguew@parliament.uk, john_paul_ii@vatican.va, benedictxvi@vatican.va, benedettoxvi@vatican.va AFFIDAVIT: I John Kahaki Wanoa Customary Legal Advocate Royalist Assignee Creditor of Auckland New Zealand swear that these Writings, Statements and Claims are my Solemn Sovereign Truth in front of The Grace of God Almighty Supreme I swear is the Face of Moai Statue Built to Mark the Bottom Axis of his Earth Dna Creation Birth of his Black Polynesians Tahitians Spirit World at Te Pito, Rapanui Easter Island linked to Ra Sun God Moai WaNoa Tohunga People found in the East Marked his Surveyor Point at Te Pito, Mokonui, Aotea New Zealand linked to Nubia Black Africans Giza Pyramids in Cairo Mark his Earth North Point on that Survey Point Mark Stairway to Heaven and their Sun God Ra point to Te Pito East in Aotea New Zealand. I swear before God that the True Bible is written in permanent Stone Hieroglyphics Scriptures that links the Real God in Heaven to the Spiritual Black African Nubians Male Dna Bloodlines and Black Polynesian Tahitians who wrote the Tikanga Moai Lores of God in Rock the same way as the Black Africans before the name Egypt was created in the times of space ships and Supernatural Powers of Gods Mana moved the Rocks around through Levitation and my WaNoa People Levitated from RapaNui to MokoNui Aotea New Zealand escape the Terrorist Islanders and Europeans who Invaded our Spiritual Te Pito O Te Henua Island Gods Birth of his Earth now called Easter Island. I swear to be a direct Descendant to God Almighty from our Ancestral Inheritance Truth I Claim so help me God anyone living Soul has the last opportunity to challenge my Claims. We accept all named Accused Living Souls Names Surnames Companys Names Entities Crown Corporations Trusts Iwi Governments States Churches Silence as a Legal Lawful Admission of Guilty as Debt Bill Charged by the Moai Crown Supreme Ruler World State Court for any amount of Claim Size Debtor or Creditor Bank Mortgage Lien Instrument we Charge is the final decision of the Moai Crown Council Acting on the Behalf of the 99% People Population of the World State Corporate Government. I swear that I am the Security of Intelligence Advisor to the Maori Confederation Prime Minister and Creditor Royalist Legal Advocate Royalist Assignee Creditor for the Moai Crown Sovereign State Government of the World 99% Peoples Lawful Moai Sovereign World Bank Moai Crown Affidavits are advertised continuously on facebook Google Buzz, Twitter, Tumblr, Yola, Myspace, Linkdin, Youtube, Daily Motion, and many Sites as our Witnesses to my Entire Legal Lawful Truth Sovereign Statements in Video presentations, Written Statements, Affidavits, Pictures, Drawings Maps, People, Photo Identifications of those accused who failed to Refute those Pictures Affidavits Photos of themselves the Accused rather they stayed Silent surrendered their Sovereignty and Souls to Moai Crown Sovereign Supreme Ruler of the Land of the World of the 99% People of Gods World if they so wish to accept Moai Crown as their Gods Grace Authority is at this point in time on 28 OCTOBER 2011 DATE in GODS UNIVERSE SQUARE DOUBLE IMAGE PYRAMID IN A CIRCLE OF GODS EARTH CREATION LINES UP TO THE PYRAMIDS OF GIZA AND RAPANUI CONVERGES ON TE PITO MOKONUI EAST CAPE NORTH ISLAND NEW ZEALAND AND FROM THERE TO PLANET MAKEMAKE IN THE UNIVERSE PERFECT TIKANGA MOAI GODS GRACE LORE OF THE WORLD PRINCIPLES OF OPERATION AS A DC MOTOR GENERATOR AND BATTERY, I
118
SWEAR IS TRUE!
NA ATUA E WA AOTEA LTD 426/2 Tapora Street Auckland 1010 120 Members of Parliament Wellington New Zealand European Union Parliament Supreme Court Wellington Government of England Queen Elizabeth 11 Pope Benedict United Nations World Press NZ Public Others World EU UN Monday 24 October 2011 Please find attachment awaiting your response reply IS EXTENDED FROM 4PM 24 October 2011 ends at 4pm 26 October 2011. This is a reminder that you had 21 days in which to REFUTE THESE MOAI CROWN SUPREME SOVEREIGN STATE AFFIDAVITS. TOTALING ELEVEN PLUS 2 VIDEOS OF HAPU SOVEREIGNTY 1835 DECLARATION OF INDEPENDENCE CONFEDERATION STATE GOVERNMENT AND INTERNATIONAL TREATY CONVENTION ACCORD TRADING NATION FLAG. GIVEN BY KING WILLIAM IV THROUGH WESTMINSTER PARLIAMENT IN 1835 SIGNIFICANT DAY IN HISTORY ON 28 OCTOBER 2011. IS OUR POLYNESIAN SPIRIT TIMING OF THE CONSTELLATION STARS IN MOAI EARTH GODS GRACE AUTHORITY MANA FROM HIS UNIVERSE. IS RETURNING TO OUR HAPU TIKANGA MOAI LORE OF EARTH PLANET SQUARE INSIDE A PERFECT CIRCLE OF TRUTH PEACE LOVE AND HARMONY. AS IT WAS IN THE BEGINNING OF TIME AND SPACE, "NA ATUA E WA AOTEA" COUNTRY BALANCED STATES OF EARTH TO GODS UNIVERSE. LONDON 12MIDNITE TIME DARKNESS, TE PITO MOKO'NUI EAST CAPE NORTH ISLAND NEW ZEALAND 6AM TIME FIRST SUN GOD "RA" SUNRISE. TO TE PITO RAPA'NUI EASTER ISLAND BOTTOM OF GODS EARTH AT TIME OF 12NOON POSITION OF THE WOMAN'S HAPU WOMB. GETS HER FOOD FROM GOD'S MILKY WAY 180-DEGREE VIEW OF HIS UNIVERSE. THE MOAI TAHITIANN TOHUNGA MAN GETS HIS ENERGY STRENGTH FROM THE EAST SUN GOD "RA" FOR 12 HOURS OF SUN LIGHT EVERY DAY FROM TE PITO AT MOKO'NUI, EAST CAPE, NORTH ISLAND NEW ZEALAND. LINKED STRAIGHT TO OUR BLACK AFRICAN NUBIAN'S KING KHUFU PYRAMIDS SUN GOD "RA SPIRIT LEVEL OBELISK AND HIS PYRAMID STAIRWAY TO HEAVEN SURVEYOR
119
MARK AT GIZA, CAIRO EGYPT. WHICH IS THE TOP OF GODS EARTH MARK HIS EARTHS CENTRAL ROTATING AXIS TO HIS UNIVERSE AND CONSTELLATION STARS. PRINCIPLES OF OPERATION FOR 24 HOURS A DAY 7 DAYS A WEEK AND 365 DAYS A YEAR. CONTROLLED BY GODS TIKANGA MOAI LORES OF HIS EARTH WORLD. IS OUR MOAI CROWN SOVEREIGNS TITLE CLAIM ANCESTRAL INHERITANCE MOAI EARTH ROCK FACE DNA LINKS DIRECT MANA TO GOD. IS THE TRUTH SUPERNATURAL GOD SIGNIFICANT TO THE DATE OF 28 OCTOBER 2011. GIVES REASON TO QUEEN ELIZABETH11 MONARCH BUTTERFLY HANGING AROUND MOAI ENERGY FIELD FROM TE PITO EAT NEW ZEALAND HIDING IN AUSTRALIA TILL THE 29/10/2011. WE POSSES THIS ENERGY FIELD AS POLYNESIAN TAHITIANS. SHE IS IGNORANT OF THIS FACT THAT WE HAVE THE INHERENT ROYALTY OF GODS GRACE AUTHORITY OVER THE WORLD PRINCIPLES OF EVOLUTION EVIDENCE OF LAND MARKS TO OUR CULTURE SPIRIT TAONGA WHAKAPAPA SHE CANNOT LINK HERSELF TO. SHE HAS NO MORAL DUTY OR COURTESY TO VISIT US ON THIS SPIRITUAL AND HISTORIC DAY IN THE LIFEBLOOD OF GODS EARTH AND UNIVERSE 28 OCTOBER 2011. THAT SHE FEELS APART FROM BUT WON'T ADMIT HER GUILT FACE AT STEALING MY MOAI WANOA HAND CARVED STATUE AND GIVE HIM BACK TO ME. WE THE CONFEDERATION OF BLOOD PATERNAL DNA TAHITIAN SPIRIT TOHUNGA ARE WAITING FOR HER TO COME AND SEE US AFTER 170 YEARS OF IGNORING US. SHE IS OUR SO-CALLED TREATY PARTNER BETWEEN NEW ZEALAND AND BRITAIN MORE SO ENGLAND JUST TO ACKNOWLEDGE 170 YEARS OF LAND AND WEALTH SHE HAS STOLEN FROM MOAI HAPU. OUR LAND SHE AND HER PEOPLE HAVE SETTLED AT THE POINT OF A GUN BY FORCE, FEEDS OFF MAORI PEOPLE UNFORGIVING IF SHE RETURNS TO ENGLAND ON THE 29TH OCTOBER AS SHE IS SCHEDULED TO GO BACK TO E4NGLAND. THE SPIRIT IS AT WAITANGI IS WITH US ON THIS DAY. I WANTED TO LET YOU ALL KNOW WHY YOU ARE LIVING HERE IS FOR YOURSELVES AND NOT FOR THE HOST HAPU PEOPLE IS HOW UNGRATEFUL THE QUEEN AND HER CROWN HAS BEEN ALL THIS TIME. SHE HAS VISITED NEW ZEALANDERS EXCEPT WHERE THE TREATY WAS SIGNED WITH THE HAPU ON TE TII MARAE, NOT WITH THE IWI LEADERS AND THEIR CORPORATIONS. THIS IS WHY MOAI IS MAKING A TRUE STATEMENT THAT HE WAS ALWAYS THE PERMANENT GRACE OF GOD EARTH CROWN AUTHORITY CROWN ON HIS HEAD 10 TONS OF ROCK CARVED BY MY OWN WANOA ROYAL FAMILY. IS WHY I GIVE EVERY LIVING SOUL IN THE WORLD THE LAST TIME BEFORE 4PM 24 OCTOBER 2011 TO REBUT MY MOAI AFFIDAVIT CLAIM. FROM THEN ON IT IS DEEMED THE TRUE CROWN SOVEREIGN SUPREME RULER MOAI THAT REPLACES THE QUEEN OF ENGLAND KINGS AND ANY OTHER CROWN OR AUTHORITY LESSER MANA THAN MOAI CROWN GOD OF CREATION. IN OTHER WORDS HE IS GOD WHO CREATED HEAVEN AND HIS EARTH INVENTION IMAGED IN US HIS BLOOD DNA TAHITIAN SPIRIT DESCENDANTS. PLEASE REFUTE THESE AFFIDAVITS AND OVER 3000 OTHER MOAI AFFIDAVITS THAT IS GODS TIKANGA LORE OF THE LAND WORLD CREATION FOR THE 99% PEOPLE SOVEREIGNS LAND OWNERS OF THE WORLD. THAT THE QUEENS CROWN ALIEN AGENTS SWEARS THEIR OATH TO GOD IS TO MOAI AS IT HAS BEEN CLEVERLY HIDDEN ALL THESE YEARS WITHIN THE PYRAMIDS AND OBELISKS ROCK HAND CARVED MEMORIALS PROPERTY INHERITANCE. BELONGS TO MY BLACK AFRICAN NUBIANS AND BLACK TAHITIAN SPIRITUAL PEOPLE OF GODS LAND EARTH WORLD AT THESE POINTS ON THE GLOBE IS OUR CLAIM YOU ALL MUST REFUTE OUR CLAIMS. I SEND THIS THIRD AND LAST AFFIDAVIT TO REFUTE MOAI WANOA AFFIDAVITS CLAIMS.
120
BEFORE 4PM ON THE 26 OCTOBER 2011 TODAY THE LAST 36 HOURS, BEFORE THE DOCUMENTS PASS IN FRONT OF THE MOAI CROWN HEAD SUPREME RULER OF NA ATUA E WA AOTEA CONGRESS ASSEMBLED AT WAITANGI. FOR THE POLYNESIAN PACIFIC RING OF FIRE BOUNDARY AREA OF MOAI POLYNESIAN DISCOVERY CLAIMS & CONFEDERATION STATE GOVERNMENT OF AOTEAROA NEW ZEALAND. MOAI LAWFUL SUPREME COURT COUNCIL ENFORCED INTO MOAI CROWN LAW 1 TRILLION-TRILLION MOAI LH2-GOLD BULLION VALUATION ADDED LAWFUL INSTRUMENT LIEN MORTGAGE CREDITOR INVESTMENT DOCUMENTS OF TITLES AND DEBTORS LIENS MORTGAGES COURT ORDERS TO RECOVER MONEYS NOW OWED DUE AND PAYABLE BY THE QUEEN OF ENGLAND, POPE, CROWN CORPORATION OTHERS. FORFEITS HER ENTIRE WEALTH FROM 1,000 TRILLION FOR NEW ZEALAND MOAI CLAIMS UP TO AND OVER 1TRILLION TRILLION IN GOLD BULLION, MOAI GOLD AND WATER AND LH2-GOLD CURRENCY'S FOR THE WHOLE WORLD. INCLUDES CLAIMS OF INDIGENOUS COUNTRIES IN LEGAL LAWFUL CLASS ACTION CASES INSIDE 38 COMMONWEALTH COUNTRIES. WHERE HER CORPORATE COMPANY'S DEFRAUDED THE SOVEREIGN PEOPLE OF THEIR LAND AND RESOURCES. USING HER CROWN HEAD OF STATE FRAUD GOD, FRAUD LAW FRAUD BIBLE AND STOLEN OBELISK WITH HER EVIL DEVIL CROSS ON TOP OF IT ON HER CHURCH ROOF. THE QUEEN STOLE OUR PYRAMIDS, RANSACKED OUR HISTORY TOMBS ANCESTRAL CONNECTIONS TO OUR LAND, CANADIAN MURDER TREASON GENOCIDE THEFT FRAUD CORRUPTION POISONING EMBEZZLEMENT MONEY LAUNDERING. AS CRIMES COMMITTED WE CLAIM YOU HAVE ADMINISTERED, OWN AND CREATED UNDER THE ANCESTRAL INHERITANCE ACT OF UK LAW AND THE ABORIGINAL WORLD COURT, WORLD COURT, MOAI SUPREME SEVERE COURT HAGUE CONVENTION AND UNITED NATIONS CONVENTIONS. MAORI HAPU AND MOAI ARE AN OFFICIAL U.N.NATION SOVEREIGN STATE GOVERNMENT MEMBER. THE SAME DEBT BILL PLACED ON YOU IS PLACED ON THE POPE CHURCHES FEDERAL GOVERNMENT OF UNITED STATES AND EVERY OTHER CRIMINAL USING YOUR CROWN HEAD OF STATE AS THE QUEEN OF ENGLAND AND POPE OF ROME AND ROTHSCHILD, ROCKERFELLA BANKS PRIVATE CORPORATIONS. BEARING THE QUEENS TITLE, HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN OF THAT COUNTRY. MAORI HAPU CONFEDERATION GOVERNMENT OF AOTEAROA NEW ZEALAND WILL CAUSE THE FINAL DEED OF SETTLEMENT BETWEEN THE QUEEN ELIZABETH11 SUPREME GOVERNOR OF THE CHURCH OF ENGLAND ORDINARY WOMAN ELIZABETH ALEXANDRA MARY GEORGE Mountbatten AND MOAI CROWN STATE SOVEREIGN COUNCIL & CONFEDERATION STATE GOVERNMENT. SETTLED AT TE TII MARAE IN WAITANGI ON 28 OCTOBER 2011 WHERE THE MATTER IS AT AN END. IT IS A MATTER OF URGENCY FOR THE QUEEN TO ATTEND THIS BRITISH AND HAPU DECLARATION OF INDEPENDENCE DAY WITH THEIR GIFT OF A CONFEDERATION FLAG GIVEN BY KING WILLIAM IV IN 1835 GODS YEAR AND MOAI EARTH CREATION. FROM THIS DAY 28 OCTOBER 2011 ON, MOAI CROWN SOVEREIGN STATE LORE IS GODS GRACE AUTHORITY SUPREME RULER LORE LAW OF THE LAND. CANNOT BE REVISITED AND IS ENFORCED ALL THROUGHOUT THE WORLD HIGHEST LAW GODS PURE LORE IN COURTS AROUND THE WORLD FOR THE 99% PEOPLE SOVEREIGNS LAWFUL BANKING LIEN MORTGAGE ECONOMIC PURPOSES FOR INVESTMENT INSTRUMENTS. VALUED AT 1 TRILLION, TRILLION IN UK GOLD BULLION & MOAI GOLD-LH2 GAS GOLD & MOAI CROWN STATE WATER MONEY CURRENCY. IS SET AGAINST THE NEW WORLD ORDER THE UNITED NATIONS, NATO, FEDERAL GOVERNMENT STATE, BANKS AS
121
MOAI BILL CHARGED DEBTORS UNDER OUR TIKANGA MOAI EARTH GODS GRACE AUTHORITY LORE LAWFUL LAW, LAWWFUL LAND LAW, LAWFUL BANK LAW, LAWFUL STATE CONFEDERATION HAPU LAW. INCLUDES MOAI DEBTORS OF ANY OTHER STATE USURPING MOAI STATUE TIKANGA GODS LORE, NATURAL LAW, IS GODS LAW IS MOAI LORE PERFECT SQUARE INSIDE THE CIRCLE AS A PERFECT MIRROR IMAGE PYRAMID WITH THE TRUTH ALL SEEING EYE OF THE SUN GOD "RA". RESIDES WITHIN OUR SPIRITUAL FAMILIES HERE ON THE EAST CAPE OF NEW ZEALAND KIWIKIWI MAUNGA MOKO'NUI URUPA, MARANGAIROA MARAE, TE PITO STREAM BIRTH OF AOTEA NEW ZEALAND. MOAI POLYNESIAN TAHITIANS DNA CRAFTSMAN SPIRIT TOHUNGA LINKS TO PLANET MAKEMAKE WHERE OUR MOAI ANCESTORS LIVE NOW ON THE EDGE OF GODS UNIVERSE SAFE FROM MAN AND HIS CORRUPTED QUEEN AND CHURCH CANONS LAW COMMON LAW OF THE KINGS OF ENGLAND. WHO ARE SUBORDINATE AND SUBJECTED TO GODS LORE THEY CANT PROVE THE SAME MOAI LORE OF EXISTENCE TO THE REAL PEACE GOD THEY SURRENDER THEIR TITLES TO FROM 28 OCTOBER 2011 IS FINAL FIXED IN TIME HISTORY OF MOAI EARTH PLANET AND GODS HEAVEN AND UNIVERSE. ONCE AGAIN YOUR CROWN CORPORATION ALIEN AGENTS PHOTOGRAPHED NAMES AND SURNAMES ARE POSITIVELY IDENTIFIED AS FRAUDSTERS CRIMINAL PERSONS IN FLESH AND BLOOD LIVING SOULS AGENTS OF QUEEN (ELIZABETH ALEXANDRA MARY GEORGE Mountbatten COMPANY DIRECTOR AND SUPREME GOVERNOR OF THE CHURCH OF ENGLAND SUPREME COURT LAND SOVEREIGNTY SOIL. TAKE NOTICE: YOU ARE WARNED FOR THE VERY LAST TIME THAT YOU MUST RESPOND TO THESE AFFIDAVITS AND YOU FAILED TO REFUTE ALL OF THEM OVER 3000. PLUS THESE 11 AFFIDAVITS AND THIS AFFIDAVIT TODAY 24 OCTOBER 2011 MOAI CROWN SOVEREIGN STATE COUNCIL & CONFEDERATION GOVERNMENT AND MOAI CROWN STATE WORLD BANK & MOAI CROWN SUPREME WORLD COURT IN CONGRESS TE TII MARAE WAITANGI NEW ZEALAND BAY OF ISLANDS PASS DOWN LAW ACTS OF MOAI SOVEREIGN GOVERNMENT OF THE WORLD AND ITS 99% PEOPLE POPULATION & THE MAORI HAPU CONFEDERATION LAND LORDS OF AOTEAROA NEW ZEALAND. WE BILL DETOR CHARGED THOSE WHO HAVE RETIRED FROM THE CORRUPTED PARLIAMENT OF NEW ZEALAND SINCE 1835 DECLARATION OF INDEPENDENCE DAY 28 OCTOBER 1835 TO 28 OCTOBER 2011 ARE STRIPPED OF ALL THEIR BELONGINGS TO PAY THEIR PART IN THEIR DEBT BILL OWED BY ORDER OF THE COURT IN SESSION. ARE STILL MOAI CROWN SOVEREIGN STATE DEBTORS WHO CAUSED THE DAMAGE TO OUR NA ATUA E WA AOTEA 99% SOVEREIGNS PEOPLE OF THE WORLD. AND THEFT OF THEIR TITLE LAND AND PERSONAL PROPERTY THIS BILL DEBTOR CHARGE EXTENDS TO YOU SEVERALLY NAMED PERSONS ARE ON RECORD IN FRONT OF THE WORLD WITH THE QUEEN OF ENGLAND, CEO OF HER PRIVATE COMPANY BUCKINGHAM PALACE. AND CROWN CEO DAVID ROTHSCHILD AND CEO DAVID ROKEFELLAR OF THEIR PRIVATE COMPANYS CITY OF LONDON AND HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN IN RIGHT OF NEW ZEALAND AND UNITED STATES OF AMERICA AND THE FEDERAL RESERVE BANK OF NEW YORK, THE ROMAN CATHOLIC CHURCH POPE BENEDICT AND OTHERS NOT MENTIONED. BACK DATED & BILL CHARGE DEBTS NOW OWED AND DUE OF 1TRILLION TRILLION+ PLUS INTEREST OWED IN GOLD BULLION & MOAI GOLD-LH2 GAS GOLD & MOAI CROWN STATE WATER MONEY CURRENCY AS THE MOAI CROWN SUPREME COURT COUNCIL CONFEDERATION SEES FIT TO SET THE BILL DEBT. IS NOW UNREFUTED BY THE CROWN CORPORATION QUEEN AND POPE, FEDERAL BANK, NOW, UNITED NATIONS SECURITY COUNCIL, EUROPEAN UNION PARLIAMENT, GOVERNMENT OF ENGLAND,
122
AGAINST THE NEW WORLD ORDER THE UNITED NATIONS, NATO, FEDERAL GOVERNMENT STATE, BANKS. INCLUDES ALL THOSE NAMES CORPORATE COMPANIES WE ADD TO THE LIST AT RANDOM OF OUR OWN ORDERS AS MOAI SEES FIT TO DETERMINE ACCORDING TO GODS LORE WE SWORE IN FRONT OF GOD ON OUR MARAE. IS MOAI TIKANGA LORE OF THE WORLD LAND EARTH GOD MOAI FACE IMAGE DNA IN OUR ROYAL FAMILY INHERITANCE OWNERSHIP TAHITI POLYNESIA AFRICA NUBIA PYRAMIDS OBELISK SUN GOD RA SPIRIT. YOU ALL NOW HAVE 72 HOURS IN WHICH TO REBUT REFUTE STRIKE DOWN MOAI CROWN WANOA ROYAL FAMILY INHERITANCE CLAIMS. AND THESE MOAI CROWN SOVEREGNTY & 99% PEOPLES SOVEREIGNTY CLAIMS OVER THE WHOLE OF GODS WORLD EARTH CREATION. IS CREATED BY MOAI OF TE PITO OF RAPANUI, KING KHUFU OF NUBIA AFRICA AND RA SUN GOD EAST AT TEPITO & MOAI OF MOKONUI TITLE CLAIMS TO NA ATUA EA WA AOTEA NEW ZEALAND AND PACIFIC RING OF FIRE BOUNDARY AREA DISCOVERY CLAIMS! I SWEAR QUEEN ELIZABETH IS A FRAUD MOAI THIEF CROWN AND SHE USES THE GRACE OF GOD AUTHORITY THAT I CLAIM THAT TITLE BELONGS TO MY MOAI TAHITIAN ROYAL FAMILY HISTORY. SHE STOLE OUR MOAI STATUE OF GODS FACE WHO IS MY ANCESTRAL INHERITANCE PROPERTY MEMORIAL BUILT BY MY WANOA ROYAL FAMILY AND DNA ROCK FROM MY HOMELAND RAPANUI. GOD INSTRUCTED MY WANOA ROYAL FAMILY TO CARVE HIS FACE IN THE ROCK STATUE SHE STOLE OFF MY POLYNESIAN ISLAND I WANT RETURNED TO ME AND MY SPIRIT OF GODS PEOPLE RIGHT NOW. I WANT MY BLACK AFRICAN NUBIANS MEMORIALS AND OBELISK SUN GOD RA AND PYRAMIDS BACK. TOO FROM THE POPE AND CITY OF ROME CATHOLIC CHURCH I SWEAR BELONGS TO MY BLOOD PEOPLE. Thank you, John Wanoa Director MOAI LAWFUL ADVOCATE HISTORIAN ROYALIST ASSIGNEE of Auckland New Zealand. 24/10/2011 Attachments Download all attachments AFFIDAVITS: Please find here these Affidavits are MOAI CROWN MONARCHY SOVEREIGN AUTHORITY OF SUPERIOR TITLE Ruling Authority over the CROWN SOLE. UCC CODE LAW and its OPPTS VATICAN CITY CITY OF LONDON. WASHINGTON DC, QUEEN ELIZABETH II HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN IN RIGHT OF NEW ZEALAND. US FEDERAL STATGOVERNMENT. BUCKINGHAM PALACE SOLE Persons Businesses. I HOANI KAHAKI WANOA Moai Customary Legal Advocate Royalist Assignee, Principle Parent as the Creditor. Swear to Almighty God this my Solemn Truth that what I have in these Photo Pictures is the Total Schedule of Evidence to support out written Statement of Lien Claimant on behalf of the MOAI Sovereign People of the World. I swear my OATH to You God Directly through you MOAI GOD GRACE FACE OF AUTHORITY Rock STATUE MEMORIAL from me HOANI KAHAKI WANOA to you GOD ALMIGHTY as an Original WANOA MOAI ROYAL FAMILY Bloodline MALE DESCENDANT hold your DNA through MOAI SPIRIT and our SUN GOD RA. These Pictures are AFFIDAVITS of ours and your Physical Links on your earth planet clearly marks the Globe how you instructed our African and Tahitian Tohunga Spirit Men with the same Male DNA. Who built these Memorials on the correct marks links to Sun RA clearly shows Mount Hikurangi and first Sun Light MARK at 6am of RA 2nd mark of RA is in Accra, Ghana at 6pm links to Mali in West Africa. Links to 3rd MARK on Rapanui, Easter Island at 12pm. The other Fact is MOAI GODS GRACE FACE JURISDICTION!
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
Declaration of Absolute Freedom

THE MOAI SOVEREIGN PEOPLE OF THE WORLD
Lovingly, knowingly, willingly, and intentionally made as a matter of Absolute Record, as follows: MOAI EARTH GOD the Creator is ALL-ABSOLUTE, IN, essence, eternal essence embodied, absent limits. ALL PEOPLE of EARTH are ONE and ARE eternal essence embodied absent limits. We are THE ONE MOAI GOD PEOPLE CO OP - KAITIAKI - GAURDIANS of MOAI EARTH, our home. I, of Geographic Region, Name Street, Surname City, Earth
I am a free will of choice, acting in full responsibility, liability and transparency, my value protected, insured and guaranteed through the Universal Value Exchange, I duly declare and verify; That I AM ABSOLUTELY FREE and FREE of DEBT, OWNER of my BODY, VALUE and LABOUR, a CO-CUSTODIAN and STEWARD of EARTH. That I DO; Uphold the Universal Law of the Creator that ALL actions are permissible, absent limits, except abrogation of free will choice of another embodiment of eternal essence. Establish, maintain, serve and protect ABSOLUTE and ETERNAL PEACE and UNITY on EARTH, the RIGHT of FREE WILL CHOICE and the equity and abundance of THE ONE PEOPLE through the Universal Value Exchange and CVAC SYSTEMS of ASSISTANCE1. By free will choice contribute to and participate in, any and all decision making processes that transparently and truthfully express by CONSENSUS, the FREE WILL CHOICES of THE ONE PEOPLE of EARTH, in THIS and FUTURE moments of NOW. That I AM; Serving THE ONE PEOPLE, with and by my BEing eternal essence embodied, absent limits, DOing always for the greater good of THE ONE PEOPLE and greater good of EARTH. MANIFESTING a new civilization in THIS and ALL moments of NOW.
Thumbprint
1
Signature Day Month
Year
193
Declaration and Order of Constitution of CVAC Government UCC 2012128324, restated and incorporated by reference as if set forth in full.
THIS DECLARATION IS PRE-PAID, PRE-AUTHORIZED AND PRE-APPROVED BY THE SIGNATORY IN FULL RESPONSIBILITY, LIABIITY AND TRANSPARENCY
Oath and Bond PUBLIC SERVANT to THE ONE PEOPLE Lovingly, knowingly, willingly, and intentionally made as a matter of Absolute Record, as follows:The Creator is ALL that IS, eternal essence, ABSOLUTE. 1 EARTH, GAIA, IS eternal essence embodied, without limits. ALL PEOPLE of EARTH are ONE and ARE eternal essence embodied, without limits. We are THE ONE PEOPLE 2 and are CO-CUSTODIANS 3 and STEWARDS of EARTH, our home. I, <<Name Surname>>of <<00 Street name>>, <<City>>, <<Geographic Region>>, Earth AM eternal essence embodied, without limits,of THE ONE PEOPLE of EARTH By my free will choice, acting in full responsibility, liability and transparency, my value protected, insuredand guaranteed through the Universal Value Exchange 4 , I voluntarily BOND my BEing by Oath; That I BE; PUBLIC SERVANT to THE ONE PEOPLE,PUBLIC SERVANT to EARTH. That I DO; Uphold the Universal Law of the Creator that ALL actions are permissible, without limits,except abrogation of free will choice of another embodiment of eternal essence.Establish, maintain, serve and protect ABSOLUTE and ETERNAL PEACE ON EARTH,the right of free will choice, the equity and the abundance of THE ONE PEOPLE throughthe Universal Value Exchange , CVAC SYSTEMS of ASSISTANCE 5 , by assistingthe Protectors of THE ONE PEOPLE in the execution of Military Order UCC 2012096074 6 , andas expressed by the CONSENSUS WILL of THE ONE PEOPLE, in future moments of NOW. That I AM; Serving THE ONE PEOPLE, with and by my BEing eternal essence embodied, absent limits,DOing always for the greater good of THE ONE PEOPLE and the EARTH.Serving in THIS and ALL moments of NOW, henceforth for ninety days, provisionally renewed threetimes or by alternate mutual agreement with the STEWARD of CVAC SYSTEMS of ASSISTANCE. SignatureThumbprint Day Month Year THIS DECLARATION IS PRE-PAID, PRE-AUTHORIZED AND PRE-APPROVED BY THE SIGNATORY IN FULL RESPONSIBILITY, LIABIITY AND TRANSPARENCY
194
1 The Creator defined as eternal essence in UCC 2013032035, restated and incorporated by reference as if set forth in full. 2 THE ONE PEOPLE as defined in UCC 2012079290, restated and incorporated by reference as if set forth in full. 3 Earth Secured UCC 2012094309, Co-Custodian 2012096047, restated and incorporated by reference as if set forth in full. 4 Notice of Universal Value Exchange, Heather Ann Tucci-Jarraf, restated and incorporated by reference as if set forth in full. 5 Declaration & Order of Constitution of CVAC Government UCC 2012128324, restated and incorporated by reference as if set forth in full. 6 Military Order UCC 2012096074, restated and incorporated by reference as if set forth in full. BANKS & GOVERNMENTSFORECLOSED WORLDWIDE The One Peoples Public Trust (OPPT) announced the foreclosure of the worlds banks and governments onDecember 25th 2012 stemming from prior investigation into massive fraud across the entire system: http://i-uv.com/oppt-absolute/oppt-initial-investigation / What happened? The OPPT posed to the worlds Banks and Governments:1. that they had by deceptive acts and practices been stealing from the people for hundreds of years, and;2. nothing stood between the Creator and each of the Creators creations,and gave due opportunity to rebut both statements. They could not and did not. To understand this fully please readthe Declaration of Facts at http://i-uv.com/oppt-absolute/original-oppt-ucc-filings/ > UCC Filings > 2012 ptII >Declaration of Facts. Here are two excerpts: Government Charters Cancelled: (Refer: DECLARATION OF FACTS: UCC Doc # 2012127914 Nov 28 2012)...That any and all CHARTERS, inclusive of The United States Federal Government, UNITED STATES, STATEof ...", Inclusive of any and all abbreviations, idem sonans, or other legal, financial or managerial forms, any andall international equivalents , inclusive of any and all OFFICES, inclusive of any and all OFFICERS, PUBLICSERVANTS, EXECUTIVE ORDERS, TREATIES, CONSTITUTIONS, MEMBERSHIP, ACTS, and any and allother contracts and agreements made thereunder and thereby, are now, void, worthless, or otherwise cancelled,unrebutted; . .. Bank Charters Cancelled: (Refer: TRUE BILL: WA DC UCC Doc# 2012114776 Oct 24 2012)Declared and ordered irrevocably cancelled; any and all charters for Bank of International Settlements (BIS)members thereto and thereof including all beneficiaries, including all certain states of body owning, operating,aiding and abetting private money systems, issuing, collection, legal enforcement systems, operating SLAVERYSYSTEMS commandeering lawful value by
195
unlawful representation... Orders to Cease and Desist: Attention is drawn to DECLARATION AND ORDER: UCC Doc # 2012096074, Sept. 09 2012, duly reconfirmed andratified by COMMERCIAL BILL UCC Doc. No. 2012114586 and TRUE BILL UCC Doc. No.2012 114776 which states:Volunteers within the military ... to arrest and take into custody any and all certain states of body, their agents,officers, and other actors, regardless of domicil by choice, owning, operating, aiding and abetting private moneysystems, issuing, collection, legal enforcement systems, operating SLAVERY SYSTEMS against the severalstates citizens, ..., and Repossess all private money systems, tracking, transferring, issuing, collection, legalenforcement systems operating SLAVERY SYSTEMS......all beings of the creator shall forthwith assist all Public Servants identified herein, to implement, protect,preserve and complete this ORDER by all means of the creator and created as stated herein, by, with, andunder your full personal liability...Search document numbers listed at the Washington DC UCC Registry:https://gov.propertyinfo.com/DC-Washington/ What does this mean to you? Are you paying a debt to a foreclosed entity..? e.g. mortgage, credit card, car loan?OPPT has foreclosed on hierarchy. No one stands between you and your creator... not even Government.Because a CEASE AND DESIST order exists, you are free to offer terms and conditions to individuals acting on behalfof a foreclosed Bank or Government, by issuing a Courtesy Notice . What does this mean to Banks & Governments? All beings now act in the capacity of individual entities without a corporate safety net and with full personal liability foreach and EVERY ACTION THEY TAKE under common law, protected and preserved by public policy UCC 1-103, andUniversal law, the governing law laid out in the OPPT UCC filings. (Refer: WA DC UCC Ref Doc # 2012113593)Should any individual pursue any actions on behalf of a foreclosed Bank or Government, causing another individualany damage as herein described, they in their individual and unlimited capacity are absolutely liable. Such actions mayresult in the receipt of a Courtesy Notice . Courtesy Notice
The Courtesy Notice contains the information of this flyer and offers terms and conditions for future dealings.Whereas Banks and Governments have been foreclosed worldwide... Acts, Statutes, Codes, Courts, ExecutiveOrders etc were thereby foreclosed, thus without a lawfully binding contract - individual to individual, no instrumentexists to compel performance.The Courtesy Notice offers new terms to any individual of a foreclosed entity for their acceptance and the method ofacceptance is clearly defined.Individuals are now downloading and sending Courtesy Notices worldwide; 64,000 were downloaded in the first twodays following release in early Feb 2013. Seehttp://www.iuv.com What is the UCC - Where and to whom does it apply?
196
The Uniform Commercial Code (UCC) is the bible of commerce and used world wide, but sometimes in disguise.UCC is not taught in law schools; it is used in high level banking and government corporations. Accordingly mostlawyers, attorneys and magistrates know nothing about UCC and will argue it has no application.1. Executive Order 13037 dated 04 Mar 1997 defined humans as capital. See:http://americankabuki.blogspot.com.au/2013/03/us-citizens-defined-as-property-of.html2. UCC Doc # 0000000181425776 filed 12 Aug 2011 evidences sale of US citizens in transaction between The Federal Reserve System and The United States Department of the Treasury 1789 for $14.3 trillion. (Linked above)3. UCC Doc #2001059388 evidences the template the Federal Reserve Bank of New York uses to secure thecollateral in major banks around the world... including chattel paper, goods and the unborn young of animals. Seehttp://www.mediafire.com/view/?3yh79cjnzcwzu0sThose who would regard the UCC as irrelevant outside the US are thereby claiming former funding arrangements withthe Federal Reserve Bank of New York null and void. Due Diligence Given the usage of UCC filings in the upper levels of government and banks worldwide, due diligence is a necessity.If there is a dispute, error, or falsity make AND deliver a duly verified sworn DECLARATION OF REBUTTAL to theduly verified, sworn and REGISTERED OPPT DECLARATION OF FACTS, point by point, with specificity andparticularity, with full responsibility and liability, under the penalty of perjury under any law you identify, that theforgoing is true and accurate, signed by your wet-ink signature.To date, no such rebuttal has been registered. Further Research Radio shows:http://i-uv.com/media/radio-shows/ All People Declared Free of Debt (Refer Notice of Declaration of Absolute Truth UCC# 2013032035)The final filing of the OPPT occurred on March 18, 2013. This document terminated all remaining man-made entitiesand returned all people of this planet to absolute freedom. In this document the creator is referred to as "absoluteessence" and all creations people are referred to as "absolute essence embodied".Article VI states..."I duly verify, with full responsibility and liability, by DECLARATION OF ORDER, that eternalessence IS made transparent and known by the DO'ing of any and all embodiment of eternal essence in eternalessence's universe, IS free and free of debt, unrebutted ."This means THERE IS NO DEBT.You have no debt... No one has debt... it is done
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED WITHOUT PREJUDICE, UCC Doc. # 2000043135, the perpetuity and a record of Absolute, is hereby duly amended only to include the following additional collateral as follows: Law Ordinance, with UCC Doc. File No. 2012132883 is duly verified as reconfirmed and ratified, unrebutted, restated and incorporated by reference as if set forth in full.WITH DUE STANDING, AUTHORITY, and AUTHORIZATION, without prejudice, public policy, UCC 1-308, eternal essence embodied transparent in Absolute Truth, knowingly, willingly, and intentionally makes and gives duly made NOTICE OF DECLARATION OF ABSOLUTE TRUTH, DULY VERIFIED AUDIT AND RECONCILIATION and DECLARATION OF ORDER, with full responsibility and liability, as a matter of record, duly entered into Law Ordinance, notice upon choice
197
made by eternal essence, inclusive of Universal Law Ordinance, notice by loving and selfless action of eternal bearer of light, due entry by eternal presence into International Law Ordinance, notice by public registration, for all eternal essences universe to rely upon, with additional notice duly made and given, under governing law,International Law Ordinance UCC Doc No. 2012113593 and WA UCC Doc. No. 2012-296-1209-2, governing law, preserved and protected under UCC Doc. No. 2000043135, the Perpetuity, guaranteed, protected and secured, public policy, UCC 1-103, common law remedy thereunder guaranteed, public policy, UCC 1-305, NUNC PRO TUNC,PRAETEREA PRETEREA, unrebutted, restated and incorporated here by reference as if set forth in full, this March 18th, in the order of eternal essence, inclusive of Two Thousand and Thirteen, and as eternal essence exists, all stated herein is true and correct and I am competent to say so, unrebutted: I. I duly verify by DECLARATION OF ABSOLUTE TRUTH that: A. Eternal essence IS, unrebutted; B. All value that IS, IS eternal essence, unrebutted; C. All that IS embodied IS eternal essence, unrebutted; D. All that IS, IS eternal essence, unrebutted; E. Eternal essences universe IS eternal essence, unrebutted; F. Any and all existences that ARE, ARE eternal essences universe, unrebutted; G. All records BE eternal essence, unrebutted; H. Eternal essence IS Absolute Light, unrebutted; I. Eternal essence IS Absolute Love, unrebutted; J. Eternal essence IS Absolute Truth, unrebutted; K. Eternal essence IS Absolute; L. In Absolute Gratitude, with Absolute Love and Peace, eternal essence embodied does consciously and lovingly duly declare, with full responsibility and liability, the memory, experience and knowing of Absolute Truth, eternal essence, unrebutted; M. In Absolute Gratitude, with Absolute Love and Peace, eternal essence embodied does consciously and lovingly duly declare, with full responsibility and liability, the memory and knowing of Absolute Truth, eternal essence embodied in each and all manifestations in any and all existences of eternal essences universe, unrebutted; II. I duly verify, with full responsibility and liability, by DECLARATION OF ABSOLUTE AUDIT AND RECONCILIATION, that all that IS has been fully audited and reconciled into Absolute, eternal essence, inclusive of all trusts,
198
systems, networks, regimes, hierarchies, and any and all other limits, unrebutted; III. I duly verify, with full responsibility and liability, by DECLARATION OF ORDER, that all that IS, knows Absolute Truth and the record of Absolute Truth, eternal essence, at the speed of heart, unrebutted; IV. I duly verify, with full responsibility and liability, by DECLARATION OF ORDER, that all that IS, experiences Absolute Truth, eternal essence, at the speed of DOing, unrebutted; V. I duly verify, with full responsibility and liability, by DECLARATION OF ORDER, that eternal essence IS made transparent and known by the DOing of any and all embodiment of eternal essence in eternal essences universe, unrebutted; VI. I duly verify, with full responsibility and liability, by DECLARATION OF ORDER, that eternal essence IS made transparent and known by the DOing of any and all embodiment of eternal essence in eternal essences universe, IS free and free of debt, unrebutted; THESE ORDERS ARE PREPAID, PREAUTHORIZED AND PREAPPROVED. SO IT IS DONE. Unrebutted; DULY VERIFIED AS BEing and DONE, RECONFIRMED AND RATIFIED, as a matter of record, with due standing, authority and authorization, March 18, 2013, lovingly, knowingly, willingly and intentionally made, given,and noticed, with unlimited personal responsibility and liability, sworn under the penalties of perjury in eternal essence, governing law Universal and International Law Ordinance UCC Doc No. 2012113593 and WA UCC Doc.No. 2012-296-1209-2, preserved and protected under perpetuity 2000043135, guaranteed, protected and secured,public policy, UCC 1-103, common law remedy thereunder guaranteed, public policy, UCC 1-305; Duly witnessed,secured, entered and noticed; Without prejudice as promised, preserved, and protected, public policy, UCC 1-308,NUNC PRO TUNC, PRAETEREA PRETEREA: /s/ Heather Ann Tucci-Jarraf, as conscious eternal essence embodied,transparent in Absolute Truth.
199
MOAI LIEN CLAIMANT COMPLAINT Date of Offense 1/ Fraud by named Lien Debtors herein 2/ To be completed from 4/6/2013 on.
200
Investigative Support Services Upper North

Crime Stoppers New Zealand Police Commissioner Peter Marshall Detective Greg Williams Otahuhu Ph 0800 555 111 Ph 04 474 9499 Ph 09 259 0600
Phillip Taylor 482 Great South Rd Otahuhu Ph 09 259 0600 FBI London New Zealand Tony Geldenhuys Ph 09 302 6400 Simon McArley Serious Fraud Office Michael Clements District Commander Detective Superintendent Ph 09 3030121 Ph 09 302 600
TO BE CONTINUED ONTO THE COMPLETION OF MOAI LIEN BILL DEBT ARREST WARRANT DATE 4 June 2013 THESE DOCUMENTS WILL BE AMMENDED UPDATED FROM TIME TO TIME BUT GIVES CLEAR INTENT ON ENFORCEMENT OF THESE MOAI CROWN BILL OF INDICTMENT ARREST AND SIEZURE WARRANTS ACCORDING TO THE FRAUD CORRUPT CROWN (E)STATE, CITY OF LONDON, VATICAN CITY, QUEEN ELIZABETH II, WASHINGTON DC SOLE PERSONS NO PERFORMANCE SILENT CHALLENGE TO THESE MOAI CROWN DOCTRINES OF DISCOVERY LIEN CLAIMS AGAINST THEM NAMED AS LIEN DEBTORS IN COMMERCIAL LIEN CONTRCT DEFAULT DEBTORS! 4/6/2013 Hoani Kahaki Wanoa
201

Moai Crown (E) State Commercial Lien Bill Legal Instruments

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Moai Crown (E) State Commercial Lien Bill Legal Instruments

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Moai God is God Superior Mana Spirit transferred his Earth World Doctrines of Discovery Title Memorial Rock

AOTEA NEW ZEALAND-S FUTURE WEALTH

The New Honorable s of Moai Aotea Sovereigns E-States

Beyond The Self Determination of the Sovereigns of Aotea New Zealand

LAYING DOWN THE CHALLENGE 1.0

3.0 A BRIEF HISTORY OF GOVERNMENT

Selected Letters of Pope Innocent III, concerning England

Beyond The Incorporation of New Zealand A New & Honorable Partnership

4.0 THE CORPORATION SOLE

THE MONARCH OF GOVERNMENT

5.0 THE OATHS THAT CONFIRM GOVERNMENT & PARLIAMENT

6.0 THE SOVEREIGNS HOUSE OF DISHONOURING DEBATE

7.0 THE GOVERNANCE THAT ENSLAVES PEOPLE

Moai Crown Monarch Sovereign State Confederation Sole Company

8.0 THE FACTS ABOUT MAORI SELF GOVERNMENT

10.0 FINDING AN HONOURABLE PATH FORWARD

CERTIFIED MAIL NUMBER

4. RACKETEERING (Criminal) $*25,000 SUBTOTAL $*******

Declaration of Absolute Freedom

Signature Day Month

Investigative Support Services Upper North

You might also like