10 views

Uploaded by rmendozaing

- HighDive Review All SOLUTIONS
- Practice Problem Trig
- trignometry
- calculus.pdf
- math-as
- Calculus by gilbert strang
- Safalta.com - Mathematics Book For All Government Exams
- IIT JEE 2009 Maths Analysis
- Measurement and Calibration Handbook
- Shri Bala 1 Page
- Calc Study Guide
- Math Song Sing a Long
- 113_1_Quiz1
- Calculus
- Power System Engineering Lecture 5
- MAT Ch. 6 Notes
- Report designer Manual - 16.Appendix I
- Chapter 04
- Trig Addition Formula
- chapter-8-introduction-to-trigonometry-and-its-applications.pdf

You are on page 1of 39

13.0 Introduction

Our motivation is to obtain a distribution

system branch model for use in phase-

frame studies, in contrast to sequence-

frame studies. Phase-frame models for

distribution system analysis are only

appropriate for computer studies. Before

computers, sequence-frame models were the

common approach. The advantage of phase-

frame modeling is improved accuracy, since

we may easily represent variability in the

elements of the primitive impedance matrix

(rather than requiring equal diagonal

elements and equal off-diagonal elements in

order to achieve decoupling of the sequence

circuits and the resulting ability to perform

per-phase analysis of each sequence circuit).

Up until now, our interest has been entirely

focused on the series impedance part of the

2

distribution branch model. This is the part of

the distribution branch for which a voltage

drops as loading current increases, and the

voltage drop always leads the current that

caused it (or the current lags the voltage).

Another effect is that leading current is

produced as a function of the voltage at a

bus. This effect is caused by capacitance. In

the case of overhead lines, the capacitance is

between phases. In the case of underground

cables, the capacitance is between each

phase conductor and its outside shield.

Which do you think is larger, on a per mile

basis?

Recall the relation for capacitance of a

parallel plate configuration:

d

A

C

= == =

(1)

where is the permittivity of the medium

between the plates, A is the area of one of

the plates, and d is the distance of separation

3

between them. Note that as d decreases, C

increases. For overhead lines, the separation

is on the order of several feet. In contrast,

for cables, the separation is usually less than

an inch. As a result, underground cable

capacitance is typically much larger than

overhead line capacitance.

What does this do to currents? Recall that

X

c

=1/C, so as C goes up, reactance goes

down. For a shunt capacitor, the current is

given by V/jX

C

, so for greater capacitance,

we get more charging currents.

So it is common to neglect capacitance for

overhead lines, but not for cables. And even

for lines, particularly if they are long, it can

be important to model capacitance.

In our case, however, since we intend to

embed our phase-frame models in computer

programs, there is no reason not to go ahead

4

and model the capacitance, despite the fact

that its effects are relatively small.

13.1 Distribution branch model

It is useful at this point, before we proceed

to describe how to obtain the distribution

branch capacitance model, to answer the

question, What will we do with it when we

get it?

To answer this question, Fig.1 shows a

distribution branch model. Note the

similarity between this model and the -

equivalent model presented in EE 303 (and

EE 456) for transmission lines, with the

main difference being that here we see all

three phases.

Note the presence of the shunt components

characterized by the Y

abc

matrix (half on left

and half on right). Also note that n and m

indicate nodes (not neutral conductors).

5

+

+

+

+

+

+

- - -

[Yabc]

2

1

[Yabc]

2

1

- - -

Vag

n

Vcg

m

Vbg

m

m

Node - m

Vag

m

Ia

m

Ib

m

Ic

m

Z

aa

Z

bb

Z

cc

Z

ab

Z

bc

Z

ca

a

Iline

b

Iline

c

Iline

Ia

n

Ib

n

Ic

n

Node - n

Vbg

n

Vcg

n

[ICabc]

n

[ICabc]

Fig. 1

We can relate voltages on the left to voltages

on the right using KVL according to:

( (( (

( (( (

( (( (

( (( (

( (( (

( (( (

( (( (

( (( (

+ ++ +

( (( (

( (( (

( (( (

( (( (

= == =

( (( (

( (( (

( (( (

( (( (

c

b

a

cc cb ca

bc bb ba

ac ab aa

cgm

bgm

agm

cgn

bgn

agn

Iline

Iline

Iline

Z Z Z

Z Z Z

Z Z Z

V

V

V

V

V

V

(2)

We can also relate currents to the left of

node m to currents to the right of node m

using KCL at node m according to:

( (( (

( (( (

( (( (

( (( (

( (( (

( (( (

( (( (

( (( (

+ ++ +

( (( (

( (( (

( (( (

( (( (

= == =

( (( (

( (( (

( (( (

( (( (

cgm

bgm

agm

cc cb ca

bc bb ba

ac ab aa

cm

bm

am

c

b

a

V

V

V

Y Y Y

Y Y Y

Y Y Y

I

I

I

Iline

Iline

Iline

2

1

(3)

Substituting eq. (3) into eq. (2) yields:

6

) )) )

` `` `

( (( (

( (( (

( (( (

( (( (

( (( (

( (( (

( (( (

( (( (

+ ++ +

( (( (

( (( (

( (( (

( (( (

( (( (

( (( (

( (( (

( (( (

+ ++ +

( (( (

( (( (

( (( (

( (( (

= == =

( (( (

( (( (

( (( (

( (( (

cgm

bgm

agm

cc cb ca

bc bb ba

ac ab aa

cm

bm

am

cc cb ca

bc bb ba

ac ab aa

cgm

bgm

agm

cgn

bgn

agn

V

V

V

Y Y Y

Y Y Y

Y Y Y

I

I

I

Z Z Z

Z Z Z

Z Z Z

V

V

V

V

V

V

2

1

(4)

We can go further with this, and we will, but

this suffices, for the moment, to motivate

our work on capacitance, which we will

eventually convert to the Y

abc

matrix used in

eq. (4) above.

13.2 Infinite Uniform Charged Conductor

Consider a charge Q on infinitely long

charge on a conductor of length L and radius

r. Then the charge density is

Lq Q

L

Q

q = == = = == =

(5)

7

L

R

+

+

+

+

+

+ +

+

+

+

+

+ +

+

+

+ +

Fig. 2

Now consider a cylindrical surface, Fig. 2,

with a cylinder enclosing the conductor

having surface area A. The radius of the

cylinder is R, where R>>r.

Define E (volts/meter) as the electric field

intensity and D

q

(coulomb/m

2

) as the electric

flux density, both vectors directed radially

outwards from the conductor such that

E D

q

= == =

(6)

Here, r

0

= == =

,where

meter f / 10 85 . 8

12

0

= == =

.

Also define da as a vector of differential

length normal and outwards to the surface of

the cylinder.

8

Then recall Gauss law for electric fields

which says that the surface integral of the

dot product of D

q

and da equals the charge

enclosed, i.e.,

qL Q da D

A

q

= == = = == =

o

(7)

Integrating about the cylindrical surface, we

obtain:

R

q

D qL RL D

q q

2

) 2 ( = == = = == =

(8)

Substituting eq. (6) into eq. (8) results in

R

q

E

2

= == =

(9)

Now recall that potential difference between

two points in space p

a

and p

b

that are located

a distance D

a

and D

b

, respectively, from the

conductor is obtained by

= == = = == =

b

a

D

D

b a ab

dl E v v v o

(10)

9

Since E and dl are both in the radially

outwards direction, and using eq. (9), with R

replaced by l, we have

a

b

D

D

D

D

D

D

b a ab

D

D q

dl

l

q

dl

l

q

dl E v v v

b

a

b

a

b

a

ln

2

1

2

2

= == = = == =

= == = = == = = == =

o

(11)

13.3 Capacitance of a 2-wire line

Consider two straight infinitely long

conductors separated in space by a distance

D

12

, having radii of r

1

and r

2

, respectively.

q

2

q

1

D

12

Point a Point b

Fig. 3

10

We desire to obtain the potential difference

between two arbitrary points in space due to

the charges residing on the conductors.

Our approach will be to use superposition

and obtain

) 1 (

ab

v

, the potential difference due to q

1

, and

) 2 (

ab

v

, the potential difference due to q

2

.

Then we will add to obtain the total potential

difference.

From eq. (11), we know that the potential

difference between two points D

1a

and D

1b

away from conductor 1 is given by

a

b

ab

D

D q

v

1

1 1

) 1 (

ln

2

= == =

(12)

Likewise, the potential difference between

two points D

2a

and D

2b

away from conductor

b is given by

a

b

ab

D

D q

v

2

2 2 ) 2 (

ln

2

= == =

(13)

Then, by superposition,

11

) )) )

` `` `

+ ++ + = == =

+ ++ + = == = + ++ + = == =

a

b

a

b

a

b

a

b

ab ab ab

D

D

q

D

D

q

D

D q

D

D q

v v v

2

2

2

1

1

1

2

2 2

1

1 1 ) 2 ( ) 1 (

ln ln

2

1

ln

2

ln

2

(15)

If we wanted to obtain the voltage drop

between the two conductors, we would

simply place point a on conductor 1 and

point b on conductor 2. The result would be

) )) )

` `` `

+ ++ + = == =

12

2

2

1

12

1

ln ln

2

1

D

r

q

r

D

q v

ab

(16)

13.4 Voltage eq. for multi-wire configuration

Consider having N charged conductors

labeled 1,,N. Then eq. (15) generalizes,

and we may obtain the voltage drop between

any two points a and b in space as

) )) )

` `` `

+ ++ + + ++ + = == =

Na

Nb

N

a

b

ab

D

D

q

D

D

q v ln ... ln

2

1

1

1

1

(17)

Now lets assume that we place the point a

on conductor i and the point b on conductor

12

j, where k=1,,i,,j,N. Then eq. (17)

becomes

) )) )

` `` `

+ ++ + + ++ + + ++ +

+ ++ + + ++ + = == =

Na

Nb

N

ja

j

j

i

ib

i

a

b

ab

D

D

q

D

r

q

r

D

q

D

D

q v

ln ... ln

... ln ... ln

2

1

1

1

1

(18)

But then D

ib

=D

ja

=D

ij

, and the voltage we are

computing is v

ij

. So,

) )) )

` `` `

+ ++ + + ++ + + ++ +

+ ++ + + ++ + = == =

Ni

Nj

N

ij

j

j

i

ij

i

i

j

ij

D

D

q

D

r

q

r

D

q

D

D

q v

ln ... ln

... ln ... ln

2

1

1

1

1

(19)

A more compact version of eq. (19) is:

= == =

= == =

N

k

ki

kj

k ij

D

D

q v

1

ln

2

1

(20)

where

D

kj

=distance between conductors k and j, ft.

D

ki

=distance between conductors k and i, ft.

D

kk

=r

k

, the radius of conductor k.

13

13.5 Capacitance of overhead lines

Although the ground does not contribute

much capacitance for overhead lines, it does

contribute some. To account for this

influence, and the influence from nearby

conductors, we use the method of images.

The method of images proceeds from the

fact that a point or line charge above a

conducting plane, illustrated in Fig 4a, will

produce an electric field exactly the same as

the electric field produced by the same

configuration together with its image, but

without the conducting plane, illustrated in

Fig. 4b.

i

S

jj

/2

S

jj

/2

S

ii

/2

S

ii

/2 S

ii

/2

-q

i

Fig. 4b

-q

i

q

j

q

j

q

i

q

i

S

ij

D

ij

S

jj

/2

D

ij

Fig. 4a

j

14

Note that

The image charges are the negative of the

actual charges

We may apply eq. (20) to the

configuration of Fig. 4b to compute

potential difference between any two

conductors

So lets apply eq. (20) to compute the

potential difference between conductor i and

its image. This will be:

= == =

= == =

N

k

ki

ki

k ii

D

D

q V

1

'

'

ln

2

1

Note that k=1,,4, with

k=1i

k=2i

k=3j

k=4j

| || |

| || |

| || |

\ \\ \

| || |

+ ++ + + ++ + + ++ + = == =

i j

i j

j

ji

ji

j

i i

i i

i

ii

ii

i ii

D

D

q

D

D

q

D

D

q

D

D

q V

'

' '

'

'

'

' '

'

'

'

ln ln ln ln

2

1

(21)

Also note that

D

ii

= D

ii

=S

ii

, D

ii

=D

ii

=r

i

,

D

ji

=D

ji

=D

ij

, D

ji

=D

ji

=S

ij

.

15

Then eq. (21) becomes:

| || |

| || |

| || |

\ \\ \

| || |

+ ++ + + ++ + + ++ + = == =

ij

ij

j

ij

ij

j

ii

i

i

i

ii

i ii

S

D

q

D

S

q

S

r

q

r

S

q V ln ln ln ln

2

1

' ' '

(22)

Now we will use the fact that q

i

=-q

i

and

q

j

=q

j

, resulting in:

| || |

| || |

| || |

\ \\ \

| || |

+ ++ + = == =

ij

ij

j

ij

ij

j

ii

i

i

i

ii

i ii

S

D

q

D

S

q

S

r

q

r

S

q V ln ln ln ln

2

1

'

(23)

Combining logarithms having the same

charge out front, we have:

| || |

| || |

| || |

\ \\ \

| || |

+ ++ + = == =

ij

ij

j

i

ii

i ii

D

S

q

r

S

q V ln 2 ln 2

2

1

'

(24)

Equation (24) gives the total voltage drop

between conductor i and its image. The

voltage drop between conductor i and

ground will be one-half of that given in eq.

(24), that is:

| || |

| || |

| || |

\ \\ \

| || |

+ ++ + = == =

ij

ij

j

i

ii

i ig

D

S

q

r

S

q V ln ln

2

1

(25)

In the general case, we will have N

conductors. In this case, the approach above

can be applied, and it will result in:

16

| || |

| || |

| || |

\ \\ \

| || |

+ ++ + + ++ + + ++ + + ++ + + ++ + = == =

iN

iN

N

i

ii

i

i

i

i

i

ig

D

S

q

r

S

q

D

S

q

D

S

q V ln ... ln ... ln ln

2

1

2

2

2

1

1

1

(26)

Define the self and mutual potential

coefficients:

Self:

i

ii

ii

r

S

P ln

2

1

= == =

(27)

Mutual:

ij

ij

ij

D

S

P ln

2

1

= == =

(28)

With

mile F meter F

air

/ 10 424 . 1 / 10 85 . 8

2 12

= == = = == =

eqs. (27) and (28) become:

Self:

i

ii

ii

r

S

P ln 17689 . 11

= == =

(29)

Mutual:

ij

ij

ij

D

S

P ln 17689 . 11

= == =

(30)

where eqs. (29) and (30) are given in units

of mile/F.

Note that we must use consistent units

within the logarithm of eqs. (29) and (30).

17

With the notation of eqs. (29) and (30), eq.

(26) becomes:

( (( ( ) )) )

iN N ii i i i ig

P q P q P q P q V

...

...

2 2 1 1

+ ++ + + ++ + + ++ + + ++ + + ++ + = == =

(31)

Equation (31) can be applied to any

configuration of overhead conductors.

Side question: Do you think eq. (31) is also

good for cables?

Answer: No.

Why not? Because eq. (26) assumes that the

electric field from the charged conductor is

not confined, i.e., it emanates in all

directions an infinite distance. Cables, on the

other hand, are purposely shielded to

confine the electric field to the area between

the phase conductor and the shield. If the

phase conductor charge induces equal and

opposite charge on the shield such that the

charge enclosed by a cylinder at the surface

of the cable is zero, then by Gauss Law for

electrostatic fields, E=0.

18

Lets apply eq. (31) to a 4 wire, three phase

overhead line with phases a, b, c, and a

neutral.

We obtain:

( (( ( ) )) )

an n ac c ab b aa a ag

P q P q P q P q V

+ ++ + + ++ + + ++ + = == =

(32)

( (( ( ) )) )

bn n bc c bb b ba a bg

P q P q P q P q V

+ ++ + + ++ + + ++ + = == =

(33)

( (( ( ) )) )

cn n cc c cb b ca a cg

P q P q P q P q V

+ ++ + + ++ + + ++ + = == =

(34)

( (( ( ) )) )

nn n nc c nb b na a ng

P q P q P q P q V

+ ++ + + ++ + + ++ + = == =

(35)

In matrix form, this is:

( (( (

( (( (

( (( (

( (( (

( (( (

( (( (

( (( (

( (( (

( (( (

( (( (

( (( (

= == =

( (( (

( (( (

( (( (

( (( (

( (( (

( (( (

n

c

b

a

nn nc nb na

cn cc cb ca

bn bc bb ba

an ac ab aa

ng

cg

bg

ag

q

q

q

q

P P P P

P P P P

P P P P

P P P P

V

V

V

V

(37)

The primitive potential coefficient matrix is:

( (( (

( (( (

( (( (

( (( (

( (( (

( (( (

= == =

nn nc nb na

cn cc cb ca

bn bc bb ba

an ac ab aa

prim

P P P P

P P P P

P P P P

P P P P

P

(38)

Define the primitive potential coefficient

matrix in terms of its submatrices:

19

| || | | || | | || | | || |

| || | | || | | || | | || |

( (( (

( (( (

( (( (

= == =

( (( (

( (( (

( (( (

( (( (

( (( (

( (( (

= == =

nn np

pn pp

nn nc nb na

cn cc cb ca

bn bc bb ba

an ac ab aa

prim

P P

P P

P P P P

P P P P

P P P P

P P P P

P

(39)

Then we can re-write eq. (37) as

| || | | || |

| || | | || |

| || | | || | | || | | || |

| || | | || | | || | | || |

| || | | || |

| || | | || |

( (( (

( (( (

( (( (

( (( (

( (( (

= == =

( (( (

( (( (

n

abc

nn np

pn pp

n

abc

q

q

P P

P P

V

V

(40)

But [V

n

]=[0].

Then we can use our Kron reduction

formula to eliminate [q

n

] as follows:

| || | | || | | || | | || | | || | | || || || | | || | | || | | || |

np nn pn pp abc

P P P P P

1

= == =

(41)

so that

| || | | || | | || | | || || || | | || |

abc abc abc

q P V = == =

(42)

Now recall that in the scalar case, C=q/V

V=q/C V=C

-1

q. Comparing to eq. (42),

we see that

| || | | || | | || | | || |

1

= == =

abc abc

C P

| || | | || | | || | | || |

1

= == =

abc abc

P C

(43)

20

So we can obtain the abc capacitance matrix

by inverting the primitive potential

coefficient matrix.

The abc capacitance matrix may be

converted to an abc admittance matrix by

multiplying by j according to:

| || | | || | | || | | || | | || | | || |

1

= == = = == =

abc abc abc

P j C j Y

(44)

This is the abc admittance matrix that we

used in the KCL equation of eq. (3) above,

repeated here for convenience.

( (( (

( (( (

( (( (

( (( (

( (( (

( (( (

( (( (

( (( (

+ ++ +

( (( (

( (( (

( (( (

( (( (

= == =

( (( (

( (( (

( (( (

( (( (

cgm

bgm

agm

cc cb ca

bc bb ba

ac ab aa

cm

bm

am

c

b

a

V

V

V

Y Y Y

Y Y Y

Y Y Y

I

I

I

Iline

Iline

Iline

2

1

(3)

Hurray!

13.6 Example

An overhead 3-phase distribution line is

constructed as in Fig. 5. Determine the

primitive potential coefficient matrix, the

abc potential coefficient matrix, the abc

shunt capacitive matrix, the abc admittance

matrix. The phase conductors are 336,400

21

26/7 ACSR (d

c

=0.721 inches, r

c

=0.03004 ft)

and the neutral conductor is 4/0 6/1 ACSR

(d

s

=0.563inches, r

s

=0.02346 ft).

25.0 ft

4.0 ft

3.0 ft

2.5 ft 4.5 ft

n

c

b

a

Fig. 5

The distances are given as:

S

aa

=58 ft S

ab

=sqrt(58

2

+2.5

2

)=58.0539ft

S

bb

=58 ft S

ac

=sqrt(58

2

+7

2

)=58.42 ft

S

cc

=58 ft S

bc

=sqrt(58

2

+4.5

2

)=58.1743ft

S

nn

=50 ft

D

ab

=2.5 ft

D

ac

=7.0 ft

D

bc

=4.5 ft

We use the above information in eqs. (29)

and (30), repeated here for convenience:

22

Self:

i

ii

ii

r

S

P ln 17689 . 11

= == =

(29)

Mutual:

ij

ij

ij

D

S

P ln 17689 . 11

= == =

(30)

The matrix elements are:

F miles P

aa

/ 56 . 84

03004 . 0

58

ln 17689 . 11

= == = = == =

F miles P

ab

/ 1522 . 32

5 . 2

0539 . 58

ln 17689 . 11

= == = = == =

F miles P

ac

/ 7147 . 23

0 . 7

42 . 58

ln 17689 . 11

= == = = == =

ab ba

P P

= == =

aa bb

P P

= == =

F miles P

bc

/ 6058 . 28

5 . 4

1743 . 58

ln 17689 . 11

= == = = == =

ac ca

P P

= == =

bc cb

P P

= == =

aa cc

P P

= == =

So the primitive potential coefficient matrix

is:

23

( (( (

( (( (

( (( (

( (( (

( (( (

= == =

6659 . 85 6131 . 26 359 . 28 2469 . 25

6131 . 26 5600 . 84 6058 . 28 7147 . 23

359 . 28 6058 . 28 5600 . 84 1522 . 35

2469 . 25 7147 . 23 1522 . 35 5600 . 84

prim

P

miles/F

Now we do the Kron reduction, invert the

matrix, multiply by j377, and we have it!

Kron reduction:

| || | | || | | || | | || | | || | | || || || | | || | | || | | || | = == = = == =

np nn pn pp abc

P P P P P

1

| || | | || | | || | | || |

( (( (

( (( (

( (( (

( (( (

= == =

( (( (

( (( (

( (( (

( (( (

( (( (

( (( (

( (( (

( (( (

2923 . 76 7957 . 19 8715 . 15

7957 . 19 1720 . 75 7944 . 26

8715 . 15 7944 . 26 1194 . 77

6131 . 26 359 . 28 2469 . 25 6659 . 85

6131 . 26

359 . 28

2469 . 25

5600 . 84 6058 . 28 2469 . 23

6058 . 28 5600 . 84 1522 . 35

7147 . 23 1522 . 35 5600 . 84

1

The above is the primitive potential

coefficient matrix. We just need to invert it

to obtain the shunt capacitive matrix:

( (( (

( (( (

( (( (

( (( (

= == =

( (( (

( (( (

( (( (

( (( (

0143 . 0 0031 . 0 0019 . 0

0031 . 0 0159 . 0 0049 . 0

0019 . 0 0049 . 0 0150 . 0

2923 . 76 7957 . 19 8715 . 15

7957 . 19 1720 . 75 7944 . 26

8715 . 15 7944 . 26 1194 . 77

1

24

And the above is the shunt capacitive

matrix. Now we multiply it by j, with

=2(60)=377.9911 rad/sec.

mile S

j j j

j j j

j j j

j Y

abc

/

3911 . 5 169 . 1 7034 . 0

169 . 1 9774 . 5 8362 . 1

7034 . 0 8362 . 1 6712 . 5

0143 . 0 0031 . 0 0019 . 0

0031 . 0 0159 . 0 0049 . 0

0019 . 0 0049 . 0 0150 . 0

) 9911 . 377 (

( (( (

( (( (

( (( (

( (( (

= == =

( (( (

( (( (

( (( (

( (( (

= == =

13.7 Concentric Neutral Cable

We recall that eq. (31), and even eq. (26), is

only applicable to overhead lines. To assess

cable capacitance, we must go back before

the point where we used the method of

images (Section 13.5), because it was in

using the method of images that we were

implicitly assuming that the electric field

was not confined.

This would be eq. (20), repeated here for

convenience:

25

= == =

= == =

N

k

ki

kj

k ij

D

D

q v

1

ln

2

1

(20)

where

D

kj

=distance between conductors k and j, ft.

D

ki

=distance between conductors k and i, ft.

D

kk

=r

k

, the radius of conductor k.

Now one thing to remember about eq. (20).

It gives the potential difference between two

points in space, given the presence of any

number of charged conductors. The

individual terms in the summation require

the distances between the two points (point i

and point j) and the various charged

conductors k=1,,N.

Now lets consider carefully the case of the

concentric neutral cable. Fig. 6 illustrates.

We assume that the entire electric field

created by the charge on the phase

conductor is confined to the boundary of the

concentric neutral strands.

26

D

12

i

5

j

4

3

1

2 k

0

12

d

c

R

b

d

s

R

b

Fig. 6

Define the following:

R

b

=radius of a circle passing through the

centers of the neutral strands.

d

c

=diameter of the phase conductors=2r

c

d

s

=diameter of a neutral strand=2r

s

k=total number of neutral strands

We use these definitions to compute the

voltage between the conductor and strand #1

in the presence of the other strands.

27

) )) )

` `` `

+ ++ + + ++ + + ++ + + ++ +

+ ++ + + ++ + = == =

= == =

= == =

b

k

k

b

i

i

b b

S

c

b

p

N

j

jp

j

j p

R

D

q

R

D

q

R

D

q

R

r

q

r

R

q

D

D

q v

1 1

21

2 1

1

1

1

ln ... ln ...

ln ln ln

2

1

ln

2

1

(31)

Assume that the charge on each of the

neutral strands is 1/k of the charge on the

phase conductor and opposite in sign.

Therefore,

q

1

= q

1

= q

i

= q

k

= -q

p

/k (32)

Substitution of eq. (32) into (31) yields

) )) )

` `` `

| || |

| || |

| || |

\ \\ \

| || |

+ ++ + + ++ + + ++ + + ++ + + ++ +

= == =

b

k

b

i

b b

S

p

c

b

p

p

R

D

R

D

R

D

R

r

k

q

r

R

q

v

1 1 21

1

ln ... ln ... ln ln

ln

2

1

Factoring out q

p

, we obtain:

28

) )) )

` `` `

| || |

| || |

| || |

\ \\ \

| || |

+ ++ + + ++ + + ++ + + ++ + + ++ +

= == =

b

k

b

i

b b

S

c

b

p

p

R

D

R

D

R

D

R

r

k

r

R

q

v

1 1 21

1

ln ... ln ... ln ln

1

ln

2

Recalling that the sum of logarithms is the

logarithm of the products, we rewrite the

above as:

) )) )

` `` `

| || |

| || |

| || |

\ \\ \

| || |

= == =

k

b

k i S

c

b

p

p

R

D D D r

k r

R

q

v

1 1 21

1

... ...

ln

1

ln

2

(33)

Now we come to the following question.

What are the distances D

21

, ,D

i1

, D

k1

?

These are the distances between strand 1 and

all of the other strands (strand 2, 3, , k).

How to obtain them? Go back to Fig. 6,

repeated here for convenience:

29

D

12

i

5

j

4

3

1

2 k

0

12

d

c

R

b

d

s

R

b

Fig. 6

Question: how to compute D

21

(=D

12

)?

Answer: Use 2 trig identities.

1. Law of cosines:

b

a

c

2.

2

cos 1

2

sin

= == =

From the Law of cosines, wrspt Fig. 6,

( (( ( ) )) )

12

2

12

2 2 2

21

cos 1 2

cos 2

2

= == =

+ ++ + = == =

b

b b b

R

R R R D

(34)

Taking square roots of both sides, we have:

cos 2

2 2 2

bc c b a + ++ + = == =

30

( (( ( ) )) ) ( (( ( ) )) )

12 12

2

21

cos 1 2 cos 1 2 = == = = == =

b b

R R D

Now multiply top and bottom inside the

square root by 2.

( (( ( ) )) )

( (( ( ) )) )

2

cos 1

2

2

cos 1 2 2

12

12

21

= == =

= == =

b

b

R

R D

o

(35)

From trig identity #2 above, we recognize

the square root term as sin(

12

/2), so:

2

sin 2

12

21

b

R D = == =

;

12

=2/k (36)

k

R D

b

sin 2

21

= == =

(37)

Everyone is happy about this.

But now we have another small problem.

What is D

31

, D

41

, ,D

i1

, D

k1

?

31

There is no reason why eq. (37) will not

apply for the other distances as well, if we

use the right angle.

But the angle is easy, it will just be a

multiple of /k.

And the multiplier, for computing D

i1

, will

just be one less than i. So.

k

i

R D

b i

) 1 (

sin 2

1

= == =

(38)

Recall eq. (33):

) )) )

` `` `

| || |

| || |

| || |

\ \\ \

| || |

= == =

k

b

k i S

c

b

p

p

R

D D D r

k r

R

q

v

1 1 21

1

... ...

ln

1

ln

2

(33)

We can now rewrite the numerator of eq.

(33) using eq. (38), according to:

( (( (

( (( (

= == =

k

k

k

i

k k

R r

D D D D r

k

b s

k i S

) 1 (

sin 2 ...

) 1 (

sin 2 ...

2

sin 2 sin 2

... ..

1

1 1 31 21

(39)

32

Now here is where I pull something out of

nowhere. The term inside the bracket

happens to be.k. Another trig identity.

In that case,

k R r D D D D r

k

b s k i S

1

1 1 31 21

... ..

= == =

(40)

Substitution of eq. (40) into eq. (33) yields:

) )) )

` `` `

| || |

| || |

| || |

\ \\ \

| || |

= == =

k

b

k

b s

c

b

p

p

R

k R r

k r

R

q

v

1

1

ln

1

ln

2

(41)

But we notice now that the R

b

terms cancel,

leaving

) )) )

` `` `

| || |

| || |

| || |

\ \\ \

| || |

= == =

b

s

c

b

p

p

R

k r

k r

R

q

v ln

1

ln

2

1

(42)

Eq. (42) gives the voltage drop from the

phase conductor to neutral strand #1.

Since all the neutral strands are at the

same potential, this is the voltage drop from

the phase conductor to each and every

neutral strand.

Since all neutral strands are grounded,

this is the voltage drop to ground.

33

) )) )

` `` `

| || |

| || |

| || |

\ \\ \

| || |

= == =

b

s

c

b

p

pg

R

k r

k r

R

q

v ln

1

ln

2

(43)

So now recall that C=q/V, so.

| || |

| || |

| || |

\ \\ \

| || |

= == = = == =

b

s

c

b

pg

p

pg

R

k r

k r

R

v

q

C

ln

1

ln

2

(44)

Last issue: what value of permittivity to use?

First of all, recall that 0

r

= == =

, where

mile F m F / 0142 . 0 / 10 85 . 8

12

0

= == = = == =

r

is the relative permittivity of the

medium in which the E-field exists.

The medium in which the E-field exists is,

for cables, not air, but rather the insulation

material. Table 1 provides typical values of

relative permittivity for standard insulating

materials.

34

Table 1: Relative permittivities

Material Permittivity

range

Polyvinyl Chloride (PVC) 3.4-8.0

Ethylene-Propylene Rubber

(EPR)

2.5-3.5

Polyethylene (PE) 2.5-2.6

Cross-linked Polyethlyene

(XLPE)

2.3-6.0

The admittance then becomes

mile S

R

k r

k r

R

j

C j Y

b

s

c

b

pg pg

/

ln

1

ln

2

| || |

| || |

| || |

\ \\ \

| || |

= == = = == =

(45)

Question:

Three identical concentric neutral cables are

buried in a trench spaced 6 inches apart. If

the admittance of one of them is Y

pg

, write

down the shunt admittance matrix Y

abc

.

35

13.8 Example

Three identical concentric neutral cables are

buried in a trench spaced 6 inches apart. The

cables are 15 kV, 250 MCM stranded all-

aluminum with 13 strands of #14 annealed,

coated copper wires, 1/3 neutral. The outside

diameter of the cable over the neutral

strands is d

od

=1.29 inches, and the neutral

diameter is d

s

=0.0641 inches. Determine the

shunt admittance matrix.

The radius is

R

b

=(d

od

-d

s

)/24=(1.29-0.0641)/2=0.6132in

The neutral radius is r

s

=0.0641/2=0.03205in

The diameter of the 250MCM phase

conductor is r

c

=0.567/2=0.2835 in.

We will assume a relative permittivity of

2.3, with

mile F / 0142 . 0

0

= == =

.

36

Substitution into eq. (45) yields:

mile S j

j

mile S

R

k r

k r

R

j

C j Y

b

s

c

b

pg pg

/ 5569 . 96

6132 . 0

) 13 ( 03205 . 0

ln

13

1

2835 . 0

6132 . 0

ln

) 60 )( 2 )( 0142 . 0 )( 3 . 2 ( 2

/

ln

1

ln

2

= == =

| || |

| || |

\ \\ \

| || |

= == =

| || |

| || |

| || |

\ \\ \

| || |

= == = = == =

The phase admittance is then

( (( (

( (( (

( (( (

( (( (

= == =

5569 . 96 0 0

0 5569 . 96 0

0 0 5569 . 96

j

j

j

Y

abc

13.8 Tape shielded cables

Figure 7 illustrates a tape shielded cable

with appropriate nomenclature.

37

AL or CU Phase

Conductor

Insulation

Jacket

CU Tape Shield

R

b

Fig. 7

Recall eq. (45), for the concentric neutral

cable with k neutral strands. Equation (45) is

repeated here for convenience:

mile S

R

k r

k r

R

j

C j Y

b

s

c

b

pg pg

/

ln

1

ln

2

| || |

| || |

| || |

\ \\ \

| || |

= == = = == =

(45)

The tape-shielded cable may be thought of

as a concentric neutral cable with an infinite

number of strands, i.e., k=. Applying this

idea to eq. (45) results in:

38

mile S

R

k r

k r

R

j

Y

b

s

c

b

k

pg

/

ln

1

ln

2

lim

| || |

| || |

| || |

\ \\ \

| || |

= == =

(46)

Eq. (46) is not hard to evaluate because we

know that

as k gets big

the natural log gets big but

much more slowly than 1/k gets small

So the second term in the denominator of eq.

(46) is dominated by 1/k. Therefore this

second term goes to 0 as k gets big.

So we are left with:

mile S

r

R

j

Y

c

b

pg

/

ln

2

= == =

(47)

Equation (47) is what we will use for

computing the shunt admittance for a tape

shielded cable.

Values of permittivity should still come

from Table 1.

39

13.9 Example

Determine the shunt admittance of the

single-phase tape-shielded cable having

outside diameter of 0.88 inch with 1/0 AA

phase conductor. The thickness of the tape

shield is 5 mils.

First, we may obtain the diameter of the

phase conductor from the table of conductor

data. This is read off as 0.368 inches, so that

the radius is r

c

=0.184 inches.

The radius of a circle passing through the

center of the tape shield is

inches

d

R

s

b

4375 . 0

2

1000 / 5

= == =

= == =

Substitution into eq. (47), with 0

3 . 2 = == =

yields

mile S j

j

Y

pg

/ 3179 . 89

184 . 0

4375 . 0

ln

) 60 )( 2 )( 0142 . 0 )( 3 . 2 ( 2

= == = = == =

- HighDive Review All SOLUTIONSUploaded byEmilio Garcia
- Practice Problem TrigUploaded bythendral
- trignometryUploaded byAnkur Chopra
- calculus.pdfUploaded byVangapanduSrinivasarao
- math-asUploaded byapi-293713600
- Calculus by gilbert strangUploaded bydesijatt11desi
- Safalta.com - Mathematics Book For All Government ExamsUploaded bySafalta.com
- IIT JEE 2009 Maths AnalysisUploaded byfaizankhan260690
- Measurement and Calibration HandbookUploaded byAhmed Ramadan
- Shri Bala 1 PageUploaded byRajesh Mishra
- Calc Study GuideUploaded byJohnny Pham
- Math Song Sing a LongUploaded bynekselva
- 113_1_Quiz1Uploaded bySanjay Rai
- CalculusUploaded bytrantong
- Power System Engineering Lecture 5Uploaded bynnvpratap
- MAT Ch. 6 NotesUploaded byAaron Tanaka
- Report designer Manual - 16.Appendix IUploaded byeuelvis1045
- Chapter 04Uploaded byitsmohanecom
- Trig Addition FormulaUploaded bydjalilkadi
- chapter-8-introduction-to-trigonometry-and-its-applications.pdfUploaded byRAJENDRA TELVEKAR
- 1 Cell StructureUploaded byshaarwin
- Calculus I Assessment TestUploaded byJohn-Michael Kuczynski
- TRIGONOMETRY.pptUploaded byAnnisa Musvita Sari
- curriculum analysisUploaded byapi-268935004
- triangles - quinnUploaded byapi-348901731
- BooksUploaded byRebel Mad
- Lecture 3Uploaded byPablo Lopez
- Bilko Mini-Lesson 3_ Advanced Use of FormulasUploaded byimburi
- Jee Mains 9 SolutionUploaded byiitforum
- towerUploaded bypinku_thakkar

- Escalona - Transductores y sensores en la automatizacion industrial 0000.pdfUploaded byrmendozaing
- Vidal - El Chamanismo de Los Arawakos de Rio Negro Su Influencia en La Politica Local y Regional en Amazonas de Venezuela 2002Uploaded byrmendozaing
- Info IEEE 1048 ASTM f 855 Draft 13 feb 2014.pdfUploaded byrmendozaing
- CATENARIA BARRAS SE3.xlsUploaded byrmendozaing
- Medicion de Resistividad de SuelosUploaded byDavid Cusi Ventura
- Fuerzas Cortantes y Momentos FlexionantesUploaded byJhonander Oropeza
- Bolts Pernos.pdfUploaded byrmendozaing
- apuntes introducc resistencia de materialesUploaded byrmendozaing
- Louie - Transmission line parameters 2 Extended review and example problems Presentation 2008.pdfUploaded byrmendozaing
- 798_boletin45Uploaded byOscar Cely Ruiz
- iec61850-introUploaded byAndres Felipe Alarcon Penagos
- indice materiales distribucion-001.pdfUploaded byrmendozaing
- Varios - Laminas Anatomia Del Cerebro 0000Uploaded byrmendozaing
- CIRED - Round table on neutral earthing in low voltage networks 2001.pdfUploaded byrmendozaing
- Anon - Conductor and transformer modeling 0000.pdfUploaded byrmendozaing
- SIBA - Frequently asked questions about fuse applications Fuses 0000.pdfUploaded byrmendozaing
- TutorialTRVAlexander-DufournetUploaded by노영진
- DOE - Handbook Guide to good practices for oral examinations 1997.pdfUploaded byrmendozaing
- Servo MotorUploaded byapi-3728045
- Grebe - Capacitor switching and its impact on power quality Draft paper 0000.pdfUploaded byrmendozaing
- Bachmann - What happens during an earthquake Presentation 0000.pdfUploaded byrmendozaing
- comunicationUploaded byMuhammed Islahuddin
- OM 6-8 Protection in Distribution SystemsUploaded bydamlan1
- Anon - Sistemas de puesta a tierra subestaciones 0000.pdfUploaded byrmendozaing
- Hartwell - Grounding non separately derived generator systems 1995.pdfUploaded byrmendozaing

- Design of Rotating Electrical Machines2Uploaded byaliroz
- Fm Assignment 1Uploaded byaadhan
- Short Circuit for TransformerUploaded byNoli Oteba
- Drilling CalcUploaded byilkerkozturk
- Physics Lab Assessment 7 PARTA- The Conservation of Energy (Elastic Potential Energy) Practical ReportUploaded byMark Riley
- Data SheetUploaded bySolomeo Paredes
- module.pdfUploaded bykhawaldeh jamal
- A New Hybrid Series Active Filter Configuration to Compensate Voltage Sag, Swell, Voltage and Current Harmonics and Reactive PowerUploaded bykaushik9595
- T5290Uploaded byHanif Harun
- MIT8_02SC_notes10to11Uploaded byJorge Franco Ibañez
- Material Balance in Froth FlotationUploaded byBernard García Durán
- Vulnerability of Overhead Transmission Line Caused by GallopingUploaded byhughcab
- Fuse TechnologyUploaded bysivasankar
- AbrUploaded byabhilash
- Test I.docxUploaded bygeazy
- Beauvais DC Motor LPUploaded byPak Tam
- Vacuum Circuit Breaker or VCB and Vacuum InterruptersUploaded byGideon Moyo
- ForceUploaded bystallone21
- MAGNETO HYDRO DYNAMIC POWER GENERATIONUploaded byRavi Kiran M
- What is Three Ammeter Method_ - QuoraUploaded bykalokos
- Aplikacija i Model2Uploaded byNedim Hadžiaganović
- IIT-JAM 2018 SolutionUploaded byAnupam Deka
- Chapter 1 Measurements (11)-Uploaded byAniqa Ahmad
- OAR Study GuideUploaded byOkaygetwrekt
- Power System StabilityUploaded byKarteek
- Tips and Tricks MagnetsUploaded byRajeev Arora
- 1504.07963v3.pdfUploaded byAndersson De La Cruz
- ECBUploaded byKarun Kumar
- reaUploaded byBboubrahim Bbnn