Professional Documents
Culture Documents
= == =
(27)
Mutual:
ij
ij
ij
D
S
P ln
2
1
= == =
(28)
With
mile F meter F
air
/ 10 424 . 1 / 10 85 . 8
2 12
= == = = == =
eqs. (27) and (28) become:
Self:
i
ii
ii
r
S
P ln 17689 . 11
= == =
(29)
Mutual:
ij
ij
ij
D
S
P ln 17689 . 11
= == =
(30)
where eqs. (29) and (30) are given in units
of mile/F.
Note that we must use consistent units
within the logarithm of eqs. (29) and (30).
17
With the notation of eqs. (29) and (30), eq.
(26) becomes:
( (( ( ) )) )
iN N ii i i i ig
P q P q P q P q V
...
...
2 2 1 1
+ ++ + + ++ + + ++ + + ++ + + ++ + = == =
(31)
Equation (31) can be applied to any
configuration of overhead conductors.
Side question: Do you think eq. (31) is also
good for cables?
Answer: No.
Why not? Because eq. (26) assumes that the
electric field from the charged conductor is
not confined, i.e., it emanates in all
directions an infinite distance. Cables, on the
other hand, are purposely shielded to
confine the electric field to the area between
the phase conductor and the shield. If the
phase conductor charge induces equal and
opposite charge on the shield such that the
charge enclosed by a cylinder at the surface
of the cable is zero, then by Gauss Law for
electrostatic fields, E=0.
18
Lets apply eq. (31) to a 4 wire, three phase
overhead line with phases a, b, c, and a
neutral.
We obtain:
( (( ( ) )) )
an n ac c ab b aa a ag
P q P q P q P q V
+ ++ + + ++ + + ++ + = == =
(32)
( (( ( ) )) )
bn n bc c bb b ba a bg
P q P q P q P q V
+ ++ + + ++ + + ++ + = == =
(33)
( (( ( ) )) )
cn n cc c cb b ca a cg
P q P q P q P q V
+ ++ + + ++ + + ++ + = == =
(34)
( (( ( ) )) )
nn n nc c nb b na a ng
P q P q P q P q V
+ ++ + + ++ + + ++ + = == =
(35)
In matrix form, this is:
( (( (
( (( (
( (( (
( (( (
( (( (
( (( (
( (( (
( (( (
( (( (
( (( (
( (( (
= == =
( (( (
( (( (
( (( (
( (( (
( (( (
( (( (
n
c
b
a
nn nc nb na
cn cc cb ca
bn bc bb ba
an ac ab aa
ng
cg
bg
ag
q
q
q
q
P P P P
P P P P
P P P P
P P P P
V
V
V
V
(37)
The primitive potential coefficient matrix is:
( (( (
( (( (
( (( (
( (( (
( (( (
( (( (
= == =
nn nc nb na
cn cc cb ca
bn bc bb ba
an ac ab aa
prim
P P P P
P P P P
P P P P
P P P P
P
(38)
Define the primitive potential coefficient
matrix in terms of its submatrices:
19
| || | | || | | || | | || |
| || | | || | | || | | || |
( (( (
( (( (
( (( (
= == =
( (( (
( (( (
( (( (
( (( (
( (( (
( (( (
= == =
nn np
pn pp
nn nc nb na
cn cc cb ca
bn bc bb ba
an ac ab aa
prim
P P
P P
P P P P
P P P P
P P P P
P P P P
P
(39)
Then we can re-write eq. (37) as
| || | | || |
| || | | || |
| || | | || | | || | | || |
| || | | || | | || | | || |
| || | | || |
| || | | || |
( (( (
( (( (
( (( (
( (( (
( (( (
= == =
( (( (
( (( (
n
abc
nn np
pn pp
n
abc
q
q
P P
P P
V
V
(40)
But [V
n
]=[0].
Then we can use our Kron reduction
formula to eliminate [q
n
] as follows:
| || | | || | | || | | || | | || | | || || || | | || | | || | | || |
np nn pn pp abc
P P P P P
1
= == =
(41)
so that
| || | | || | | || | | || || || | | || |
abc abc abc
q P V = == =
(42)
Now recall that in the scalar case, C=q/V
V=q/C V=C
-1
q. Comparing to eq. (42),
we see that
| || | | || | | || | | || |
1
= == =
abc abc
C P
| || | | || | | || | | || |
1
= == =
abc abc
P C
(43)
20
So we can obtain the abc capacitance matrix
by inverting the primitive potential
coefficient matrix.
The abc capacitance matrix may be
converted to an abc admittance matrix by
multiplying by j according to:
| || | | || | | || | | || | | || | | || |
1
= == = = == =
abc abc abc
P j C j Y
(44)
This is the abc admittance matrix that we
used in the KCL equation of eq. (3) above,
repeated here for convenience.
( (( (
( (( (
( (( (
( (( (
( (( (
( (( (
( (( (
( (( (
+ ++ +
( (( (
( (( (
( (( (
( (( (
= == =
( (( (
( (( (
( (( (
( (( (
cgm
bgm
agm
cc cb ca
bc bb ba
ac ab aa
cm
bm
am
c
b
a
V
V
V
Y Y Y
Y Y Y
Y Y Y
I
I
I
Iline
Iline
Iline
2
1
(3)
Hurray!
13.6 Example
An overhead 3-phase distribution line is
constructed as in Fig. 5. Determine the
primitive potential coefficient matrix, the
abc potential coefficient matrix, the abc
shunt capacitive matrix, the abc admittance
matrix. The phase conductors are 336,400
21
26/7 ACSR (d
c
=0.721 inches, r
c
=0.03004 ft)
and the neutral conductor is 4/0 6/1 ACSR
(d
s
=0.563inches, r
s
=0.02346 ft).
25.0 ft
4.0 ft
3.0 ft
2.5 ft 4.5 ft
n
c
b
a
Fig. 5
The distances are given as:
S
aa
=58 ft S
ab
=sqrt(58
2
+2.5
2
)=58.0539ft
S
bb
=58 ft S
ac
=sqrt(58
2
+7
2
)=58.42 ft
S
cc
=58 ft S
bc
=sqrt(58
2
+4.5
2
)=58.1743ft
S
nn
=50 ft
D
ab
=2.5 ft
D
ac
=7.0 ft
D
bc
=4.5 ft
We use the above information in eqs. (29)
and (30), repeated here for convenience:
22
Self:
i
ii
ii
r
S
P ln 17689 . 11
= == =
(29)
Mutual:
ij
ij
ij
D
S
P ln 17689 . 11
= == =
(30)
The matrix elements are:
F miles P
aa
/ 56 . 84
03004 . 0
58
ln 17689 . 11
= == = = == =
F miles P
ab
/ 1522 . 32
5 . 2
0539 . 58
ln 17689 . 11
= == = = == =
F miles P
ac
/ 7147 . 23
0 . 7
42 . 58
ln 17689 . 11
= == = = == =
ab ba
P P
= == =
aa bb
P P
= == =
F miles P
bc
/ 6058 . 28
5 . 4
1743 . 58
ln 17689 . 11
= == = = == =
ac ca
P P
= == =
bc cb
P P
= == =
aa cc
P P
= == =
So the primitive potential coefficient matrix
is:
23
( (( (
( (( (
( (( (
( (( (
( (( (
= == =
6659 . 85 6131 . 26 359 . 28 2469 . 25
6131 . 26 5600 . 84 6058 . 28 7147 . 23
359 . 28 6058 . 28 5600 . 84 1522 . 35
2469 . 25 7147 . 23 1522 . 35 5600 . 84
prim
P
miles/F
Now we do the Kron reduction, invert the
matrix, multiply by j377, and we have it!
Kron reduction:
| || | | || | | || | | || | | || | | || || || | | || | | || | | || | = == = = == =
np nn pn pp abc
P P P P P
1
| || | | || | | || | | || |
( (( (
( (( (
( (( (
( (( (
= == =
( (( (
( (( (
( (( (
( (( (
( (( (
( (( (
( (( (
( (( (
2923 . 76 7957 . 19 8715 . 15
7957 . 19 1720 . 75 7944 . 26
8715 . 15 7944 . 26 1194 . 77
6131 . 26 359 . 28 2469 . 25 6659 . 85
6131 . 26
359 . 28
2469 . 25
5600 . 84 6058 . 28 2469 . 23
6058 . 28 5600 . 84 1522 . 35
7147 . 23 1522 . 35 5600 . 84
1
The above is the primitive potential
coefficient matrix. We just need to invert it
to obtain the shunt capacitive matrix:
( (( (
( (( (
( (( (
( (( (
= == =
( (( (
( (( (
( (( (
( (( (
0143 . 0 0031 . 0 0019 . 0
0031 . 0 0159 . 0 0049 . 0
0019 . 0 0049 . 0 0150 . 0
2923 . 76 7957 . 19 8715 . 15
7957 . 19 1720 . 75 7944 . 26
8715 . 15 7944 . 26 1194 . 77
1
24
And the above is the shunt capacitive
matrix. Now we multiply it by j, with
=2(60)=377.9911 rad/sec.
mile S
j j j
j j j
j j j
j Y
abc
/
3911 . 5 169 . 1 7034 . 0
169 . 1 9774 . 5 8362 . 1
7034 . 0 8362 . 1 6712 . 5
0143 . 0 0031 . 0 0019 . 0
0031 . 0 0159 . 0 0049 . 0
0019 . 0 0049 . 0 0150 . 0
) 9911 . 377 (
( (( (
( (( (
( (( (
( (( (
= == =
( (( (
( (( (
( (( (
( (( (
= == =
13.7 Concentric Neutral Cable
We recall that eq. (31), and even eq. (26), is
only applicable to overhead lines. To assess
cable capacitance, we must go back before
the point where we used the method of
images (Section 13.5), because it was in
using the method of images that we were
implicitly assuming that the electric field
was not confined.
This would be eq. (20), repeated here for
convenience:
25
= == =
= == =
N
k
ki
kj
k ij
D
D
q v
1
ln
2
1
(20)
where
D
kj
=distance between conductors k and j, ft.
D
ki
=distance between conductors k and i, ft.
D
kk
=r
k
, the radius of conductor k.
Now one thing to remember about eq. (20).
It gives the potential difference between two
points in space, given the presence of any
number of charged conductors. The
individual terms in the summation require
the distances between the two points (point i
and point j) and the various charged
conductors k=1,,N.
Now lets consider carefully the case of the
concentric neutral cable. Fig. 6 illustrates.
We assume that the entire electric field
created by the charge on the phase
conductor is confined to the boundary of the
concentric neutral strands.
26
D
12
i
5
j
4
3
1
2 k
0
12
d
c
R
b
d
s
R
b
Fig. 6
Define the following:
R
b
=radius of a circle passing through the
centers of the neutral strands.
d
c
=diameter of the phase conductors=2r
c
d
s
=diameter of a neutral strand=2r
s
k=total number of neutral strands
We use these definitions to compute the
voltage between the conductor and strand #1
in the presence of the other strands.
27
) )) )
` `` `
+ ++ + + ++ + + ++ + + ++ +
+ ++ + + ++ + = == =
= == =
= == =
b
k
k
b
i
i
b b
S
c
b
p
N
j
jp
j
j p
R
D
q
R
D
q
R
D
q
R
r
q
r
R
q
D
D
q v
1 1
21
2 1
1
1
1
ln ... ln ...
ln ln ln
2
1
ln
2
1
(31)
Assume that the charge on each of the
neutral strands is 1/k of the charge on the
phase conductor and opposite in sign.
Therefore,
q
1
= q
1
= q
i
= q
k
= -q
p
/k (32)
Substitution of eq. (32) into (31) yields
) )) )
` `` `
| || |
| || |
| || |
\ \\ \
| || |
+ ++ + + ++ + + ++ + + ++ + + ++ +
= == =
b
k
b
i
b b
S
p
c
b
p
p
R
D
R
D
R
D
R
r
k
q
r
R
q
v
1 1 21
1
ln ... ln ... ln ln
ln
2
1
Factoring out q
p
, we obtain:
28
) )) )
` `` `
| || |
| || |
| || |
\ \\ \
| || |
+ ++ + + ++ + + ++ + + ++ + + ++ +
= == =
b
k
b
i
b b
S
c
b
p
p
R
D
R
D
R
D
R
r
k
r
R
q
v
1 1 21
1
ln ... ln ... ln ln
1
ln
2
Recalling that the sum of logarithms is the
logarithm of the products, we rewrite the
above as:
) )) )
` `` `
| || |
| || |
| || |
\ \\ \
| || |
= == =
k
b
k i S
c
b
p
p
R
D D D r
k r
R
q
v
1 1 21
1
... ...
ln
1
ln
2
(33)
Now we come to the following question.
What are the distances D
21
, ,D
i1
, D
k1
?
These are the distances between strand 1 and
all of the other strands (strand 2, 3, , k).
How to obtain them? Go back to Fig. 6,
repeated here for convenience:
29
D
12
i
5
j
4
3
1
2 k
0
12
d
c
R
b
d
s
R
b
Fig. 6
Question: how to compute D
21
(=D
12
)?
Answer: Use 2 trig identities.
1. Law of cosines:
b
a
c
2.
2
cos 1
2
sin
= == =
From the Law of cosines, wrspt Fig. 6,
( (( ( ) )) )
12
2
12
2 2 2
21
cos 1 2
cos 2
2
= == =
+ ++ + = == =
b
b b b
R
R R R D
(34)
Taking square roots of both sides, we have:
cos 2
2 2 2
bc c b a + ++ + = == =
30
( (( ( ) )) ) ( (( ( ) )) )
12 12
2
21
cos 1 2 cos 1 2 = == = = == =
b b
R R D
Now multiply top and bottom inside the
square root by 2.
( (( ( ) )) )
( (( ( ) )) )
2
cos 1
2
2
cos 1 2 2
12
12
21
= == =
= == =
b
b
R
R D
o
(35)
From trig identity #2 above, we recognize
the square root term as sin(
12
/2), so:
2
sin 2
12
21
b
R D = == =
;
12
=2/k (36)
k
R D
b
sin 2
21
= == =
(37)
Everyone is happy about this.
But now we have another small problem.
What is D
31
, D
41
, ,D
i1
, D
k1
?
31
There is no reason why eq. (37) will not
apply for the other distances as well, if we
use the right angle.
But the angle is easy, it will just be a
multiple of /k.
And the multiplier, for computing D
i1
, will
just be one less than i. So.
k
i
R D
b i
) 1 (
sin 2
1
= == =
(38)
Recall eq. (33):
) )) )
` `` `
| || |
| || |
| || |
\ \\ \
| || |
= == =
k
b
k i S
c
b
p
p
R
D D D r
k r
R
q
v
1 1 21
1
... ...
ln
1
ln
2
(33)
We can now rewrite the numerator of eq.
(33) using eq. (38), according to:
( (( (
( (( (
= == =
k
k
k
i
k k
R r
D D D D r
k
b s
k i S
) 1 (
sin 2 ...
) 1 (
sin 2 ...
2
sin 2 sin 2
... ..
1
1 1 31 21
(39)
32
Now here is where I pull something out of
nowhere. The term inside the bracket
happens to be.k. Another trig identity.
In that case,
k R r D D D D r
k
b s k i S
1
1 1 31 21
... ..
= == =
(40)
Substitution of eq. (40) into eq. (33) yields:
) )) )
` `` `
| || |
| || |
| || |
\ \\ \
| || |
= == =
k
b
k
b s
c
b
p
p
R
k R r
k r
R
q
v
1
1
ln
1
ln
2
(41)
But we notice now that the R
b
terms cancel,
leaving
) )) )
` `` `
| || |
| || |
| || |
\ \\ \
| || |
= == =
b
s
c
b
p
p
R
k r
k r
R
q
v ln
1
ln
2
1
(42)
Eq. (42) gives the voltage drop from the
phase conductor to neutral strand #1.
Since all the neutral strands are at the
same potential, this is the voltage drop from
the phase conductor to each and every
neutral strand.
Since all neutral strands are grounded,
this is the voltage drop to ground.
33
) )) )
` `` `
| || |
| || |
| || |
\ \\ \
| || |
= == =
b
s
c
b
p
pg
R
k r
k r
R
q
v ln
1
ln
2
(43)
So now recall that C=q/V, so.
| || |
| || |
| || |
\ \\ \
| || |
= == = = == =
b
s
c
b
pg
p
pg
R
k r
k r
R
v
q
C
ln
1
ln
2
(44)
Last issue: what value of permittivity to use?
First of all, recall that 0
r
= == =
, where
mile F m F / 0142 . 0 / 10 85 . 8
12
0
= == = = == =
r
is the relative permittivity of the
medium in which the E-field exists.
The medium in which the E-field exists is,
for cables, not air, but rather the insulation
material. Table 1 provides typical values of
relative permittivity for standard insulating
materials.
34
Table 1: Relative permittivities
Material Permittivity
range
Polyvinyl Chloride (PVC) 3.4-8.0
Ethylene-Propylene Rubber
(EPR)
2.5-3.5
Polyethylene (PE) 2.5-2.6
Cross-linked Polyethlyene
(XLPE)
2.3-6.0
The admittance then becomes
mile S
R
k r
k r
R
j
C j Y
b
s
c
b
pg pg
/
ln
1
ln
2
| || |
| || |
| || |
\ \\ \
| || |
= == = = == =
(45)
Question:
Three identical concentric neutral cables are
buried in a trench spaced 6 inches apart. If
the admittance of one of them is Y
pg
, write
down the shunt admittance matrix Y
abc
.
35
13.8 Example
Three identical concentric neutral cables are
buried in a trench spaced 6 inches apart. The
cables are 15 kV, 250 MCM stranded all-
aluminum with 13 strands of #14 annealed,
coated copper wires, 1/3 neutral. The outside
diameter of the cable over the neutral
strands is d
od
=1.29 inches, and the neutral
diameter is d
s
=0.0641 inches. Determine the
shunt admittance matrix.
The radius is
R
b
=(d
od
-d
s
)/24=(1.29-0.0641)/2=0.6132in
The neutral radius is r
s
=0.0641/2=0.03205in
The diameter of the 250MCM phase
conductor is r
c
=0.567/2=0.2835 in.
We will assume a relative permittivity of
2.3, with
mile F / 0142 . 0
0
= == =
.
36
Substitution into eq. (45) yields:
mile S j
j
mile S
R
k r
k r
R
j
C j Y
b
s
c
b
pg pg
/ 5569 . 96
6132 . 0
) 13 ( 03205 . 0
ln
13
1
2835 . 0
6132 . 0
ln
) 60 )( 2 )( 0142 . 0 )( 3 . 2 ( 2
/
ln
1
ln
2
= == =
| || |
| || |
\ \\ \
| || |
= == =
| || |
| || |
| || |
\ \\ \
| || |
= == = = == =
The phase admittance is then
( (( (
( (( (
( (( (
( (( (
= == =
5569 . 96 0 0
0 5569 . 96 0
0 0 5569 . 96
j
j
j
Y
abc
13.8 Tape shielded cables
Figure 7 illustrates a tape shielded cable
with appropriate nomenclature.
37
AL or CU Phase
Conductor
Insulation
Jacket
CU Tape Shield
R
b
Fig. 7
Recall eq. (45), for the concentric neutral
cable with k neutral strands. Equation (45) is
repeated here for convenience:
mile S
R
k r
k r
R
j
C j Y
b
s
c
b
pg pg
/
ln
1
ln
2
| || |
| || |
| || |
\ \\ \
| || |
= == = = == =
(45)
The tape-shielded cable may be thought of
as a concentric neutral cable with an infinite
number of strands, i.e., k=. Applying this
idea to eq. (45) results in:
38
mile S
R
k r
k r
R
j
Y
b
s
c
b
k
pg
/
ln
1
ln
2
lim
| || |
| || |
| || |
\ \\ \
| || |
= == =
(46)
Eq. (46) is not hard to evaluate because we
know that
as k gets big
the natural log gets big but
much more slowly than 1/k gets small
So the second term in the denominator of eq.
(46) is dominated by 1/k. Therefore this
second term goes to 0 as k gets big.
So we are left with:
mile S
r
R
j
Y
c
b
pg
/
ln
2
= == =
(47)
Equation (47) is what we will use for
computing the shunt admittance for a tape
shielded cable.
Values of permittivity should still come
from Table 1.
39
13.9 Example
Determine the shunt admittance of the
single-phase tape-shielded cable having
outside diameter of 0.88 inch with 1/0 AA
phase conductor. The thickness of the tape
shield is 5 mils.
First, we may obtain the diameter of the
phase conductor from the table of conductor
data. This is read off as 0.368 inches, so that
the radius is r
c
=0.184 inches.
The radius of a circle passing through the
center of the tape shield is
inches
d
R
s
b
4375 . 0
2
1000 / 5
= == =
= == =
Substitution into eq. (47), with 0
3 . 2 = == =
yields
mile S j
j
Y
pg
/ 3179 . 89
184 . 0
4375 . 0
ln
) 60 )( 2 )( 0142 . 0 )( 3 . 2 ( 2
= == = = == =