Envision Part B

3/16/2012
ACI Web Sessions

Promoting the Planning, Design, and Construction of Sustainable Infrastructure: The Institute for Sustainable Infrastructures envision Sustainability Rating System
ACI WEB SESSIONS
ACI is bringing you this Web Session in keeping with its motto of Advancing Concrete Knowledge. The ideas expressed, however, are those of the speakers and do not necessarily reflect the views of ACI or its committees.
Please adjust your audio to an appropriate level at this time.
ACI Fall 2011 Convention October 16 20, Cincinnati, OH
ACI WEB SESSIONS
ACI Web Sessions

ACI Web Sessions are recorded at ACI conventions and other concrete industry events. At regular intervals, a new set of presentations can be viewed on ACIs website free of charge. After one week, the presentations will be temporarily archived on the ACI website or made part of ACIs Online CEU Program, depending on their content.
ACI Online CEU Program

ACI offers an easy-to-use Online CEU Program for anyone who needs to earn Continuing Education credits. Once registered, you can download and study reference material. After passing a 10-question exam on the material, you will receive a certificate of completion that you can present to local licensing agencies.
Visit www.concrete.org/education/edu_online_CEU.htm for more information.
ACI WEB SESSIONS
ACI WEB SESSIONS
ACI Conventions
ACI conventions provide a forum for networking, learning the latest in concrete technology and practices, renewing old friendships, and making new ones. At each of ACIs two annual conventions, technical and educational committees meet to develop the standards, reports, and other documents necessary to keep abreast of the ever-changing world of concrete technology. With over 1,300 delegates attending each convention, there is ample opportunity to meet and talk individually with some of the most prominent persons in the field of concrete technology. For more information about ACI conventions, visit www.aciconvention.org.
ACI WEB SESSIONS ACI WEB SESSIONS
ACI Web Sessions

This ACI Web Session includes 2 speakers presenting at the ACI fall convention held in Cincinnati, OH, October 16 20, 2011. Additional presentations will be made available in future ACI Web Sessions. Please enjoy the presentations.
3/16/2012
Spring 2012 Seminars

ACI/PCA 318-11 Building Code Seminar
Omaha, NEApr 4 Pittsburgh, PAApr 10 New Orleans, LAApr 12 Cleveland, OHApr 25 Ft. Myers, FLMay 1 Salt Lake City, UTMay 9 Kansas City, KSMay 23 San Diego, CAMay 31 San Antonio, TXJun 12 Albany, NYJun 14
Concrete Slabs-on-Ground
Chicago, ILApr 17 San Francisco, CAApr 24 Denver, COMay 8 Charlotte, NCMay 15 Milwaukee, WIJun 5
Troubleshooting Concrete Construction

Dallas, TXMar 22
Concrete Repair Basics

New Brunswick, NJApr 5 Philadelphia, PAJun 14
Seattle, WAApr 11 Nashville, TNApr 18 Boston, MAMay 2 Indianapolis, INMay 16 Atlanta, GAMay 23 Baltimore, MDJun 6 Portland, ORJun 13
ACI WEB SESSIONS
ACI WEB SESSIONS
For more information, visit ACI Seminars.
ACI Fall 2011 Convention October 16 20, Cincinnati, OH
Peter Binney, is a professional engineer with over 35 years of experience in the public and private sector. He specializes in water resources engineering and has served as the Director of a major water utility as well as serving clients needs across the United States and internationally. He holds post graduate degrees in civil engineering and water resources management. He currently serves as the director of Sustainable Infrastructure for Merrick & Co. in Aurora Colorado. For the last two years, he has been working with ASCEs Committee for Sustainability on the development of the sustainable infrastructure rating system that will be used to guide practitioners and owners in achieving higher degrees of sustainable performance for civil infrastructure projects. He is the Chair of the Technical Committee and a Board member of the Institute for Sustainable Infrastructure.
Howard B. LaFever, earned his B.S. in Civil Engineering from Clarkson University and his M.S. in Sanitary Engineering & Water Resources Planning from Cornell University. He worked his way up through the engineering ranks, specializing in wastewater and solid waste services at Stearns & Wheler to his current position as a Principal with GHD (formerly Stearns & Wheler). Howard is a licensed professional engineer in NY, PA, VT, OH, and MA, and is a Board Certified Environmental Engineer (BCEE) of the American Academy of Environmental Engineers. He is currently serving on the Board of Directors as Chair-elect for the recently formed Institute for Sustainability Infrastructure (ISI). He is also a member of the New York State Association of Solid Waste Management, American Public Works Association (former Region II Director [DE, PA, NY, NJ]), American Society of Civil Engineers (Fellow Member), New York State Society of Professional Engineers, past President of the Central Chapter of ACEC New York, and a member of the Water Environment Federation. ACI WEB SESSIONS
ACI WEB SESSIONS
Topics
Sustainable Infrastructure Rating System - envision

Peter Binney, PE, MASCE Manager, Technical Development, Institute for Sustainable Infrastructure Director, Sustainable Infrastructure, Merrick & Company Howard LaFever, PE, BCEE Board, Institute for Sustainable Infrastructure Principal, GHD
ACI Conference - October 19, 2011 11
What is Sustainability? Why is it important? Why do we need a rating system? What are the benefits? What is ISI? How Does It Interface with Your Initiatives? What are ISI products/services? How do you get involved/get started? Demonstration What next?
12
ACI Conference - October 19, 2011
3/16/2012
What is Sustainability?

Sustainability - Mega Trends

Conservation and Efficiency Measures Electric vehicles replace gasoline engines Water use regulations CO2 regulations Sustainability
13
14
A Life of Its Own ??
Reliability, resilience, affordable, supportable, balanced, efficient, effective, adaptability, durability, ...
.
COMMUNITY
ECONOMICS ENVIRONMENT
15
16
Sustainable Development Not a trade-off between business and the environment but a synergy between them

World Population Growth

Human History to 1800s to reach 1 Billion 6.5 Billion+ today Add 1 billion people every 10-11 years
Industrial Revolution
17
3/16/2012
Why Do We Need to Do Anything Else?
Why Do We Need Sustainability?

Falling
behind global competitors, the US struggles to gain traction in planning and building the critical infrastructure investments that are necessary to ensure future economic growth and support an expanding population ..
Urban Land Institute, Ernst and Young, Infrastructure 2010
We must maintain and improve our infrastructure system to ignite economic growth, improve our global competitiveness, and make it easier for businesses to create jobs .
U.S. Chamber of Commerce, ASCE, U.S. Conference of Mayors, and the National Governors Association, October 2011
19
20
The Infrastructure Gap - $2.2 Trillion by 2015
What is Changing?
- 1960 1960 - 2010
Infrastructure Expansion
Either the country can risk further productivity decline, transportation congestion and potential catastrophes from dilapidated systems or it can develop new networks to accommodate the expected 100million in population growth over the next generation. Current infrastructure spending may help fix some outmoded and crumbling roads, transit lines ad sewage systems but it offers no long term solutions for keeping the U.S competitive in global markets or addressing related energy consumption and environmental concerns.
Ernst and Young, Infrastructure 2009: A Pivot Point
ACI Conference - October 19, 2011 .
Environmental Protection
2010 -
Constructive Balance ? Project Delivery Models Financial Constraints Jobs Loss of Service Loss of Functionality
22
How Are We Doing?
Not So Well
ASCE 2009 Report Card for Americas Infrastructure
Grade point average: D
C in 1988
5 year investment needed: $2.2 trillion C+ for solid waste D- for drinking water, inland waterways, levees, roads, and wastewater
23 ACI Conference - October 19, 2011 24
Grade range

3/16/2012
Transportation Systems Needs

.
Energy Infrastructure Needs

55 million people affected by the 2003 Black Out
NASA Views Before And During Outage
25
26
Water Scarcity
Things to Do, Places to Go .
27
28
Natural Disasters
Aging Infrastructure
Japan Tsunami
Katrina
29
30
3/16/2012
Public Ownership of Decisions

Delivering Solutions vs Conflict
Economic Effectiveness
How Do We Get
The Best Bang for the Buck

and Still Deliver
Desired Level of Service

While Protecting
Community Quality of Life

and
Environmental Values
ACI Conference - October 19, 2011 31 ACI Conference - October 19, 2011 32
Changing Financial Inputs

Financing Project delivery Technology Design Informed Consent Regulatory
We Are Building 2050 Today!

Range of useful life of various constructed works
Objective Framework
Source:Peakeverything Letsfaceitall...AndWin, MatthisWackernagel (ICLEIWorldCongress2009), http://www.slideshare.net/ICLEIWorldCongress2009/peakeverythingletsfaceitallmatthiswackernagelicleiworldcongress2009
33
34
Project Delivery Models Can Change the Sustainability Equation
We Can Deliver Technical Solutions !
Efficiency
Effectiveness
35
36
3/16/2012
How Do We Deliver Environmental and Corporate Responsibility In An Industrial Society?
LEED Started a New Wave of Innovation in the Building Industry

Race to the top! Identify and implement new technologies that support the LEED brand

Solar panels Geothermal heating and cooling More

38
37
ACIConference October19,2011
How Has LEED Transformed the Building Industry?
What About Infrastructure?
Redefined building value
Provided a way for building customers (owners, tenants, residents, the public) to recognize and understand the value of building green Low 1st costs low life cycle costs Provided a system for measuring, assessing and publically recognizing building performance Better LEED-defined performance = higher value Established a recognized and respected brand in the building market for high performance buildings
No overall sustainable infrastructure rating system
Many sector-specific (900+)
Infrastructure presents a different challenge compared to buildings:
Developed value metrics
Building design and construction - usually controlled by a single organization Public Nature of Infrastructure Projects affects/ benefits macro ecosystems, communities, and regions; must consider
Created the brand
Public stakeholder expectations and support; Environmental responsibility; Impact on public life; And, the use of public funds sustainability needs to pay for itself!
Source: Daniel Goleman, Ecological Intelligence, Broadway Books, New York, 2009
39
40
Engineers and Construction Industry Need to Deliver Smart, Green and Affordable Solutions
What is ISI and what are its products/services?
envision
41
42
3/16/2012
42
3/16/2012
Formation of ISI
All three founding partners committed to sustainability and developed a number of tools and resource libraries APWA Center for Sustainability ASCE Committee on Sustainability ACEC Green Scorecard ISI Formation Leveraging value of a consolidated approach Creating a framework that should become the National standard for Sustainable Infrastructure Create a civil infrastructure uniform framework for sustainability assessments
43
501 (c ) (3) Partnership Founding Partners

APWA Center for Sustainability ASCE Committee on Sustainability ACEC Green Scorecard
ISI Formation

National Benchmark for Sustainable Infrastructure Sustainable Civil Infrastructure Projects
Focus Project Performance Verification Using Civil Infrastructure Rating System

Sustainable Professional Accreditation Education and Training

44
ISI Mission Statement
ISI Core Products and Services
To provide guidance that can help deliver and transform tomorrows infrastructure [through ISIs products and services] Examine issues beyond the traditional discipline of engineering and consider how financial, political, social and environmental elements affect sustainability Serve as an Industry resource to promote sustainability in infrastructure development and re-development over the life-cycle of the natural and built environment
45
Rating System - envision Assessors Accreditation Verifier Training and Third Party Verification Verification of Project Performance - Awards and Recognition Program Interface of Owners, A/E, Agencies, Practitioners, Stakeholders Communications/Education on Rating System
46
Goals for envision Rating System
Enhancing the Version 1.0 Toolkit

Can serve as a National Benchmark for Sustainable Performance Should guide practitioners, owners, stakeholders in the framing of sustainable infrastructure solutions
Public Comments Strategic Alliance with Harvard Zofnass

Harmonization of two rating systems Collaboration and joint-representation
Sustainability must be affordable ; identify economic performance as well as community and environmental protection Keep it simple, practical, adaptable and usable
47
Alignment with Industry Groups Alignment with Founding Partner training, education, advocacy, communication
48
3/16/2012
Schedule
Membership Opportunities
Public Comment Period Open Version 2.0 Release in early 2012 Professional Accreditation Sustainability Professionals (ISI-SP) Verifiers Recognition Program (details this Fall) Training Membership (Open Currently)
Membership Types

Charter Members Sustaining Members Other Agencies/Institutions
Visit www.sustainableinfrastructure.org for additional membership details.
49
50
CJSI is Providing Critical Input to Infrastructure Sustainability Assessment

How Do ISI and the Concrete Industry Interface ?
Industry BMPs And Verifiable Benefits/ Performance
ISI Project Verification
envision
51 3/16/2012
51
52
Sustainable development: Our greatest challenge & opportunity

Why a Concrete Joint Sustainability Initiative?

Industry-wide issue Important how outside world views us Today many different faces and messages Need one face to the world and common messages Pool resources to back-up messages An unprecedented level of Industry segment collaboration required
Develop common Industry identity (One face to the world) Develop common vision of industry sustainability Pool resources and minimize duplication Back-up sustainability messages with facts Coordinate communication of outside messages
53
54
3/16/2012
Joint declaration of industry vision for a sustainable future
Declaration #4: Our integrated

thinking will focus on the following social values provided by concrete structures
1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8.
Constitutes charter document of the Concrete Joint Sustainability Initiative Contains 9 declarations Lists 8 social values of concrete structures 24 industry associations have currently signed, with more to come
Resource efficiency Safety/protection Financial responsibility Operational continuity Longevity/durability Byproducts reduction Esthetics Societal connectivity
All align with ISI KPIs
55
56
Current Concrete Joint Sustainability Initiative actions

Current actions (continued)

ACI to initiate development of 2 sustainable construction publications which could lead to more rapid code evolution PCA/NRMCA to share industry-wide imaging/ branding survey and recommendations Communication/engagement with additional Industry associations
Develop and deliver alignment/call-to-action presentation for within our Industry Association collaboration to compile and unify industry sustainability messages Compile/organize supporting facts to back up social values, identify related programs and gaps
57
58
Sustainability and Rating Systems?
envision The Rating System
Sustainability is not achieved by a uniform model or single approach because of the varying contexts, environments, community/ stakeholder/ physical needs; Technology and performance efficiency are enablers to achieve desired outcomes but the public interest is met through behaviors and informed decisions; Identify the Key Performance Indicators that influence and measure sustainable performance and can guide continuous improvement; Highlight and reinforce performance improvements that are balanced and understandable to stakeholders.
60
59
10
3/16/2012
What Does envision Apply To?
TM
What Is An Effective Rating System?
A rating system : Creates a framework of objective measures; Provides guidance that can influence performance goals and approaches; Promotes project resilience and strategic focus; Promotes consensus support to balanced tradeoffs between various project attributes and outcomes given limits of project context; The basis for negotiating a constructive outcome in terms acceptable to all parties.
61
62
Goals for Rating System
Key Features
1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6.
envisionTM can be a nationally recognized standard for higher sustainability performance for civil engineering infrastructure (across all civil infrastructure projects); Rating system should promote transformational approaches with increased project performance for triple bottom line factors in addition to technical requirements; envision should be scalable and broadly applicable Accommodate sector-specific rating systems that may also request recognition by ISI through 3rd party verification
TM
7. 8.
Expands the breadth of project contribution to sustainability Identifies infrastructure traps and vulnerabilities Expands opportunities and targets for performance improvement Makes restorative an explicit level of performance achievement Rewards focused innovation Encourages a shift to a new engineering design and project delivery paradigm Advances sustainability knowledge and education Does not assess materials or products
64
Constructing the Rating System
The Value Proposition
Should be relevant, supportive, usable and productive
E-version, interactive, instructive, outcome-based, processsupportive, outputs
Harmonizing multiple approaches to reflect a national standard for approaches and performance ISI integrity by awarding recognition through third party assessment and verification Defensible and rigorous for both advocates and opposers Support the public policy approach and lead to more effective identification, financing, regulatory approval and delivery of infrastructure solutions
66
Should be scalable according to complexity and size

Level 1 checklist and self assessment Level 2 comprehensive consideration of multiple criteria and core system Level 3 focused project assessment (+ operations, existing facilities) Level 4 multi-attribute, complex, contested, TBL balancing
Agencies, owners, consultants, communities (+/-) should be able to use approach to reach consensus through informed decision making
65
11
3/16/2012
Creating the Beta-Version
Framework of Rating Tool
Inventoried the market (900+ rating systems) Engaged two consultants experienced with FIDIC (PSM II) and CEEQUAL to develop basic framework ASCE Foundation contributed $300,000 to development of rating system Founder Partners developed goals for a rating system, critical review and development of core concepts, gap identification, refinement of approaches, products Collaboration with a number of federal agencies
67
Matrix evaluation of 5 Macro-groups, 10 Primary Criteria (reflect triple bottom line attributes) and relative performance 74 Secondary Criteria and narrative guidance A Sustainability Score and road map Supports consideration of performance achievement (higher efficiency) as well as process improvement (pathway to supportable and effective approaches) Peer review ongoing Needs additional feedback and input from agencies, owners, practitioners, activists, academics .
68
Performance and Pathway Contribution

Does this project effectively contribute to sustainability?
Sustainability Through Project Delivery

TechnologyAdvancement PerformanceGoals TeamChartering Understand/ Integrate CommunityNeeds DeliverasPartofOwner Organization PartnerwithRegulators
Restore
Performance contribution
Sought out all reasonable opportunities to improve sustainable performance Raised the bar in one or more dimensions of sustainable performance Achieved what was reasonable Considers how the project aligns with overall community needs Enhances quality of life
Sustain
Useofrecycledconcreteandasphaltin highwayconstruction
Improve
WholeSystemDesign Reduce, reuse,recycle Phaseddevelopment Adaptive Postlife
Pathway contribution
Conventional Projectteam Ownerorganization Affectedstakeholders Partnerorganizations Regulatorybodies Highwaytrafficcongestion

69 BillWallace
Design
Construct
O&M
Reuse
Disassembly
SDPerformance&Pathway
70
Dimensions of Sustainable Performance

(FIDIC)
Range of Project Performance
Restorative

(FIDIC)
Restorative
Sustainable
Sustainable
Improved
Improved
Conventional Project Team Owner NGOs Regulators Policy
Project Delivery Phase
Conventional Project Team Owner NGOs Regulators Policy
Degree of ACI Conference - October 19, Influence 2011
Conventional Designs (Checklists)

71
Life Cycle Projects

72
12
3/16/2012

(FIDIC)
Restorative
Sustainability Performance Goals

Environmental Performance
Sustainable
(beyond regulatory requirements)
Improved
Sustainability Performance
Project Team Owner
Social Performance (beyond typical stakeholder groups)
Conventional
NGOs Regulators Policy
Economic Performance (beyond conventional PW analysis)
Sustainable Projects
73 ACI Conference - October 19, 2011 74
Sustainability Vectors
DoingThingsRight
Performance Contributions Sustainable Design Process/Tools
Collaborative Delivery
Sustainability Mapping
Performance
Removal Efficiency Reliability Resilience Service life Construction schedule System Integration Context Ease of operation Maintenance Capital Cost O&M Cost Disposal Cost Energy Use Chemical Use Solids Residual Liquids Residual Aesthetics Rate Acceptance Market Availability
Technological Improvements Technical Performance Improvements Higher Performance Goals

Sustainability
Implementation
Operability
Economic
Life Cycle Cost Resource Consumption Environmental Footprint Consumer Acceptance Product Availability
Integrated Solutions Pathway Contributions TransformProgram Delivery
Environmental
Social
DoingtheRightThings
CRITERIA
OBJECTIVES
METRICS
System Components
Rating System Primary Criteria

Section 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
3/16/2012
Weight (%) 12.6 10.6 10.7 8.9 7.0 8.8 11.5 11.7 8.2 10.0 TOTAL
78 100%
75 objectives in 10 categories and 34 subcategories Five degrees of performance achievement Improved to restorative Linked to numeric score Two components of sustainability contribution Pathway (effectiveness) Performance (efficiency) Expanded scope of awards and recognition Integration with decision-support tools (Stage 4) ; conflict resolution and informed consent
77
Pathway Project Strategy & Management Community: Long & Short Term Effects Land Use & Restoration Landscapes Ecology & Biodiversity Water Resources & Environment Energy & Carbon Resource Management Including Waste Transportation
13
3/16/2012
Sustainability Rating System:

SupportIng MaterIals
Why Infrastructure Sustainability Improvement ? System Overview How does it work? Background Case for Action Key Sources and References Whos involved?
Guidelines on Sustainability and Infrastructure Decision Support: Deciding on the Right g Project j Decision Support: Project Performance
,
Project Contribution and Setup Project Management Community & Stakeholder Engagement g g Neighbors 79 communities
Historic Environment
Ecology & Biodiversity Energy & Carbon Resource Management
Landscape
Land Use
Water Resources
Transport
3/16/2012
79
80
What Indicators Promote Sustainability?
KPI Documentation and Performance
LEADERSHIP Promoting:

Sound decision making Effective management Value propositions Sourcing Health and safety Life cycle assessment
81
82
Characteristics of envision

Five Degrees of Performance
Scalable according to complexity and size One system for all types of civil infrastructure
Description Overall Guidance andChecklists Benefits Providesunderstanding ofsustainabilityand triplebottomlineaccounting and application toinfrastructure projects. SinglePurpose,localprojects Stepbystepprocess forownerorengineer to performselfassessmentandtoindicate areaswhereimprovedbenefitscouldbe achieved.BasisforISIverification Largerormorecomplexprojects inplanning stagesandwhereindividualareasof excellencecanbehighlighted. Allowsbalancing ofvariouselementsofa project tooptimizeperformance and investment.Facilitatesresolution of differingopinionsorapproaches with 83 stakeholders orregulatory needs.
Basic - Performance that is at/ above conventional Improved - Indications that superior performance is within
reach.
Stage 1
AssessmentandRecognition
Superior - Sustainable performance that is noteworthy. Sustainable - Performance that has achieved essentially zero
impact.
SinglePurposeProjectsandExisting ProjectAssessment(future) DecisionSupport (future)
Restorative - Performance that restores natural or social

systems.
84
14
3/16/2012
Life Cycle Assessment

Conceptual Design Alternatives comparison Final Design Materials selection, Value engineering Construction Tabulate quantities, durations Operations Energy and resource consumption, efficiency audits Rehabilitation and Betterment Performance improvements Decommissioning - recycling, reusing, brownfield development
Project Phases
Metrics will change as project moves from planning through design, construction and repurposing
85
86
Effectiveness
Decommissioning
Plan / Design
Construction
Operation
Sustainability Indicators and Metrics Change
How Do We Interpret Sustainable Performance?

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Basic Improved Superior Sustainable Restorative
Criteria
Efficiency
Level of Performance
ACI Conference - October 19, 2011 87 ACI Conference - October 19, 2011 88
Project Use of envision and Verification
TM
Professionals should seek training and certification in broad sustainability principles Various training opportunities but ISI will certify users TM competence in applying envision tools TM Use envision to enhance project performance TM Owners may apply for recognition of envision Achievements and performance through third party verification (Stage 2 and higher applications) Professional standards requirements for accredited sustainability professionals and verifiers
89
90
3/16/2012
90
15
3/16/2012
DEMONSTRATION
91
92
envision
QUESTIONS www.sustainableinfrastructure.org
Bill Bertera, Executive Director, Institute for Sustainable Infrastructure bertera@sustainableinfrastructure.org 202-218-6725 Peter Binney, Merrick & Co. peter.binney@merrick.com, 720-427-6026
93
94
1919 - The Pershing Map

(emphasis on coastal threats)
Thinking BIG !!!!
95
96
16
3/16/2012
Related Documents
envision Sustainability Rating System Concrete Sustainability Forum IV Concrete Sustainability Forum (ACI Fall 2009 Convention), Part 1 Concrete Sustainability Forum (ACI Fall 2009 Convention), Part 2 Concrete Sustainability Forum (ACI Fall 2009 Convention), Part 3 The Sustainable Concrete Guide - Strategies and Examples The Sustainable Concrete Guide Applications ACI Concrete Sustainability eLearning
97
ACI WEB SESSIONS
ACI Bookstore
Click on the image below to go to the web page.
Seminar Schedule
Bookstore
ACI Web Sessions
Conventions
Online CEU Program
ACI eLearning
Concrete Knowledge
ACI WEB SESSIONS
17

Envision Part B

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Description:

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Envision Part B

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

3/16/2012

ACI Web Sessions

ACI Fall 2011 Convention October 16 20, Cincinnati, OH

ACI WEB SESSIONS

ACI Web Sessions

ACI Online CEU Program

ACI WEB SESSIONS

ACI WEB SESSIONS

ACI Web Sessions

Spring 2012 Seminars

Troubleshooting Concrete Construction

Concrete Repair Basics

ACI WEB SESSIONS

For more information, visit ACI Seminars.

ACI Fall 2011 Convention October 16 20, Cincinnati, OH

ACI WEB SESSIONS

Sustainable Infrastructure Rating System - envision

ACI Conference - October 19, 2011

Sustainability - Mega Trends

ACI Conference - October 19, 2011

ACI Conference - October 19, 2011

A Life of Its Own ??

ACI Conference - October 19, 2011

ACI Conference - October 19, 2011

World Population Growth

ACI Conference - October 19, 2011

Why Do We Need to Do Anything Else?

Why Do We Need Sustainability?

ACI Conference - October 19, 2011

ACI Conference - October 19, 2011

The Infrastructure Gap - $2.2 Trillion by 2015

ACI Conference - October 19, 2011

How Are We Doing?

ASCE 2009 Report Card for Americas Infrastructure

Grade point average: D

ACI Conference - October 19, 2011

Transportation Systems Needs

Energy Infrastructure Needs

NASA Views Before And During Outage

ACI Conference - October 19, 2011

ACI Conference - October 19, 2011

Things to Do, Places to Go .

ACI Conference - October 19, 2011

ACI Conference - October 19, 2011

ACI Conference - October 19, 2011

ACI Conference - October 19, 2011

Public Ownership of Decisions

The Best Bang for the Buck

Desired Level of Service

Community Quality of Life

Changing Financial Inputs

We Are Building 2050 Today!

ACI Conference - October 19, 2011

ACI Conference - October 19, 2011

Project Delivery Models Can Change the Sustainability Equation

We Can Deliver Technical Solutions !

ACI Conference - October 19, 2011

ACI Conference - October 19, 2011

How Do We Deliver Environmental and Corporate Responsibility In An Industrial Society?

LEED Started a New Wave of Innovation in the Building Industry

Solar panels Geothermal heating and cooling More

ACI Conference - October 19, 2011