Is Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) in retail sector good for India?

NO, not at all FDI is good for India. We all know that approximately 65% of Indian economy is dependent on agriculture and small industries and farmers income is also depend on agriculture only. If FDI comes into the India then income of farmers will also stop because their crop products can not be sold due to foreign product entry into Indian market which will cause rise in poverty. Poor will become more poor because their product which they produce and sell for their income, will not be sold when fdi comes. Hence poor will become more poorer. India already struggling with poverty. So to improve the economy of India, income of those 65% people has to be increase and for this their crop product and product of other small industries should be exported, and when FDI will come, those products would not be exported. So FDI should not come into the India instead of that we can give more opportunity to those people, to sell their product in India only because we know consumers in India are enough to consume those products and hence they can earn more money and will get satisfaction.

If FDI will come in India. It will look good for a small point of time. In which we will got things on low price. As soon as it will grow in india, the common man who works as labor, middle person, retailer, shopkeeper, who got his food after full working, selling small things on road & footpath completely lost his earning because people want things on low price and they will prefer to fdi. When retailer in India will finished then fdi sell his things and products on high price and that time we will have no choice. FDI will hijack our economy. We can assume FDI as East India company because EIC come in India for business as they grew they take our independence. Government should work on its own to improve the economy instead of allowing any other outer to come and take profit.

HAI FRIENDS, I WOULD LIKE TO SHARE SOME POINTS ABOUT THE FDI IN INDIAN RETAIL, I accept the positive points, even the GOVERNMENT allows the FDI it may boosts Indian economy, but at the same time it will shows its other side of action. 1. By giving less cost for the products, the small scale industries will affected. IT means it will fully abolished by the way of those offers. 2. If we may think "by this action how will we affected". But true is after FDI gets all field or abolished all small scale industries we must fully depends for those (like WALMART). 3. The main theme is we will push to stage to accept all those things what has given by FDI. The products like delayed vegs, fruits. Retailers will affect by this method. 4. And also by this way they got strong base on USA. 5. If we accept for the benefits like infrastructure, lifestyle, good economy. We will ready to face effects of this. And by strict monitoring of our government we can allow.
+4 -6

Mamta said: (Thu, Apr 18, 2013 12:48:55 AM)

Hi friends after reading the discussion and considering the pros and cons of FDI I think if our government is so concerned about its Farmers, Retailers, Unemployed people, Infrastructure, Economy, Consumers etc. Why they are not taking first step towards setting up of their own (corruption free) effective policies. If introduction of FDI will bring negative impact after few years, why are we concern about it?If our government is capable of monitoring these policies there won't be need of any Foreign Investment.

Yes if they are really concern for their people then first of all they should bring the enough confidence among the people so that they can think positively on any matter (any new foreign policies) without the fear of failure of governing authority. Conclusion: FDI should be allowed but with proper and strict monitoring of Governing Authorities.
+6 -7

Vijay Kumar Yadav said: (Wed, Apr 17, 2013 11:02:15 PM)

Hello friends, FDI in retail sector will give significant advantage to the India. In ways it is good for the India. I am going to highlight some point which enables us to understand why FDI is important for India: 1) Employment opportunity - If many companies comes to India for their business they definitely need labor to perform their task. So they can hire our people in a large way so this give the advantage who still waiting for the job opportunity. 2) Enhance lifestyle - FDI will help to Indian people in order to enhance their lifestyle. There are many renown companies if they come to India it will make a huge impact on the people of India. 3) GDP growth - It will also help in increasing the GDP growth of the India. 4) Quality products - The major advantage of FDI is these companies will sell their standard or quality in cheaper price compare to Indian price. So people of India will definitely go for those products where they can afford to buy. Other advantage. 5) Improve infrastructure. 6) Increase tax revenue of government.

How to Deal with High Oil Prices?

1. Reduce fuel subsidies. 2. Raise tax on all cars that are used for private use. 3. Encourage everyone to take public transportation/car pool at least once a week. 4. Encourage every middle class family to install 1 solar panel (at least 100 watts capacity) to reduce power generated from imported coal. 5. Do not buy gold. It adds to our import bill and hence raises the cost of imported fuel as well.
+4 -0

Daulat Ram Meena said: (Sun, Apr 21, 2013 02:20:17 AM)

Hello friends, According to my view only government is not responsible for the high prices of oil even we are also responsible for this. We should the importance of oil. It's non renewable source of energy so we should use it carefully. These fuels are not only used in vehicles but also used for electricity production. So we can use renewable energy resources for electricity production like solar energy, wind energy etc. We can use the bio gas or bio diesel for this

purposes. Government should make fine and smooth road and provide a better transportation to people. We can minimize the use of petrol & diesel by use of public vehicle for short distance.
+4 -0

Poonam said: (Wed, Apr 17, 2013 10:11:35 AM)

Hi Friends, I would like to share my views on this important topic. Oil prices are increasing day by day. It will not go down in future. We need to understand the necessity hike oil prices. Government And public both can together help to reduce the prices. People should use public transport instead of private vehicle. Prefer walk for small distance not use bicycle or any other private vehicle. Government Should launch more and more public transport. In foreign countries like U.K. Road charges are very high so people use public transport instead of private vehicle because it cost very high. We should turn off light on red light. All are some basic tips through with help of these we can overcome increased high oil prices.
+12 -4

Himanshu said: (Wed, Apr 10, 2013 11:20:10 AM)

Well, the prices for oil will not go low for sure, day by day it will increase because the population is increasing at a much faster rate, similarly the consumption of the petrol and diesel is increasing rapidly it can go to 2-3 times the prices in the next 4-5 years, and according to the survey the source of oil will remain up to 2050. So the government and we the people should start to rely on renewable energy resources. Instead of using cycles we can use electric power driven vehicles and that will help in reducing the pollution to a large extent. I am using a one and saving the petrol. Prefer walking if you are going for a small distance.
+18 -0

Sharat K Malick said: (Tue, Apr 9, 2013 10:59:08 AM)

Hi friends, Following measures will improve the situation. - Use of public transport system. - Use of bicycles for short distances. - Energy efficient houses/ buildings using sun light. - Switching of vehicle at red light. - Rationing of petrol/diesel to rich users by use of petro card. - Subsidy for travelling in public transport. - Improving road conditions and reducing halting time at red signals by making flyovers. - R&D for cheap alternative fuel such as solar, wind and hydro.

- Heavy fines for violators. - Efficient use of fossil fuel by defence and railways. - Encouraging car pooling. Thanks.
+23 -0

Senthilkanth said: (Sat, Apr 6, 2013 08:23:54 PM)

Hai friends, I am Senthil Kanth, I want to share my knowledge in this topic. Today the world is in the race for taking the oil from the earth. Nowadays, oil level is decide one of the most powerful factor in deciding the strength of that particular country. All of them want to suck the fuel from the earth without worry about the future's life of our new generation. In my point of view, the people's in awareness is the main thing for what today's happening. So each and every men from the earth should know about this basic knowledge about our Geographic Nature. Every one should. 1. Reduce their usage of petrol and diesel vehicle for the short distance. 2. Better to take a walk for this, it also for their health. 3. Try to mingle with our neighbors for traveling, it also give time to share your feelings with them. 4. Don't encourage the children to go with bike for a shop, just tell his/her to go with their friends it will increase their friends circle. 5. Gov. Is the more responsibility for make awareness of their peoples by giving Advertisement and announcements through Radios, Tv's, Banners and posters. 6. It is responsible for both Gov. And the people to follow, no can blame the opponent. 7. Reduce usage of oil and save money, save earth. Instead of dealing with oil prices we will see this serious issue other way round that is stabilizing the demand and supply ratio. Well its far more easier to achieve if there is a greater social acceptance to certain do's and don'ts. 1) Making greater use of public transport. 2) Prefer walking over personal vehicle for shorter distance. 3) If possible a group should travel through share vehicle. 4) Giving subsidized fuel limit above which the user will be charged more than usual price. 5) Awareness about shortage of petrol diesel etc. 6) Switching off the engine when in signal. 7) Making states compulsory to have either/all of solar/geothermal/thermal/bio fuel/wind/hydro/tidal etc source of energy units depending upon the geographic condition of that region. 8) By products which are the result of petrol/diesel like cosmetics/petroleum jelly /plastic should be reduced to a certain extent.

9) If country like India can make beer/vine out of grain and vegetable in such a huge amount then using remains of sugarcane (molasses) she can produce fuel which would be more affordable. 10) Above all to make earth green we have to have more scientific research in the field of bio fuel.
+23 -2

Sanjay Kumar said: (Tue, Mar 26, 2013 01:34:23 PM)

To deal with the oil crises, everyone of this country will have to play a crucial role. Here are some suggestions for it : 1. People in urban areas will have to commute by public transport for short and long distance, this will reduce the petroleum oil, traffic jam, and will save time as well. 2. Railway government and the defense ministry have the maximum amount of land where these two departments in cooperation with the central government can do cultivation of Jatropha plant which is the alternate source of energy. 3. Government will have to subsidies battery and electricity run vehicles which will reduce the dependence on petroleum products. 4. Central government will have to invite more foreign scientists and engineers to do a joint research with our Indian scientists and engineers to explore the petroleum products in run of kutch and also in the coastal areas of our country. 5. The central government will have to make it mandatory for every state to have alternate sources of energy like wind, solar& thermal energy depending upon the geographical condition of the state. 6. The central government will have to invite more foreign companies for Investment in the country so that we can have metro connectivity here.
+30 -3

Bibin Bhaskaran said: (Mon, Mar 25, 2013 07:12:06 PM)

We can reduce the use of Fossil fuels through following ways: 1. Reduce the amount of plastic you use. Plastic is a petroleum-based product. Use canvas bags for grocery shopping, carry a reusable water bottle filled with water from home instead of buying individual plastic water bottles every time you get thirsty, and buy beverages or food items packaged in glass bottles instead of plastic ones. 2. Switch to a wood stove as a source of heat. If you have an oil furnace, consider installing a wood-burning stove instead. 3. Drive less. Walk, ride a bike, take public transportation or carpool to your destination instead of driving. If this is not possible, consider buying an electric car, hybrid car or just a car with better gas mileage that will help you reduce or eliminate the amount of oil you use. 4. Install solar panels on your home. Switching to solar power completely eliminates your dependency on fossil fuels for heat or energy in your home. 5. Buy locally grown organic produce, or plant your own organic garden. Transportation of food across the country from industrial farms to grocery stores is a big drain on fossil-fuel resources.
+8 -3

Abhishek Mishra said: (Sat, Mar 23, 2013 03:21:24 PM)

Its have been a bone of contention for government and have disbalance the budget of common man-"rising fuel prices". This quote covers the headline now and then. Recently it has gone unbridled as government handed over the duty to peg the prices to the fuel industries. The solution to this-- use public transport (now its have been a cliche almost). Most people have succumbed to that solution only. I will like to converge on the fact of use of solar energy also albeit of its high capital investment is required it is quite effective for cooking, house conditioning (naturally for winters). Countries like Russia, America have been following that but ours country's wide participation is yet to come. We need to spread the information regarding that as mostly thin it as the implicated type of energy. Also a move that government good take in aviation, transport and in LPG is veer toward the rating of the vehicles as in electronic devices. There are star ratings by ISI for the energy efficient devices. 5 star is the most energy efficient and 1 star will wolf down the electricity and your pockets. This can be successfully emulated for the vehicles also. It will encourage people to choose according to the efficiency and will serve to reduce the cost incurred and pollution as well.
+11 -0

Saleem said: (Thu, Mar 21, 2013 04:26:59 PM)

Good Afternoon to all, Every where are every one is and will get affected by excessive usage of natural resources. There should be limited and proper utilization of these resources. Research should be given prominence to find ways for different modes of energy and to reduce usage of petroleum products. Electricity plays an very important part in minimizing usage of fuel. Electronic two wheeler and cars could replace increasing carbon monoxide exhaustion from vehicles. Metro trains, MMTS, Trams which are public transport has to be planned/design with the help of government establishments which would cover most of the city/towns. All the vehicle users need to have a card system to ensure the fuel usage (individually). This will help in subsidization as there are commercial users and individual users and cards need to be on the owner vehicle registration owners. This will help restricting excess usage of fuel and charges would vary on usage of fuels. Solar energy, wind energy, fuel from sugarcane, electricity could combine in effective decrease in importing fuel. This will save lots of tax as it would possibly only increase in future. Bi-Cycle should be used as much as possible in short distance. Even private and public sectors should propagate usage of bi-cycle, hardly a couple of people drive it to their office. It helps in keeping one's fitness and saves fuel. Awareness programs are to be taken to ensure the effects of pollution, to off the vehicle at red signals and to have self start option with vehicles would also help in doing this process with ease, maximum usage of sharing vehicles especially cars to office help in reducing cost and fuel. Nevertheless practicing by few won't help much but collectively and decisions at the top level and improvisation relating with research would surely help our country progress with leaps and bounds.

Should the public sector be privatized?

Hi friends according to my point of view public sector should remain the same because. 1. Public sector will considered the social and economic welfare. 2. As we know the output is low, compare to private sector but the work is more reliable. 3. As we seen that in privatized sector the work will be more when compare to public sector.

4. More, job securities in public sector.

+0 -0

Sweta Sinha said: (Tue, Apr 23, 2013 01:59:39 PM)

According to me, the main motto of public sector is to serve the citizens without thinking one's own profit and comfort. But today, this purpose has totally vanished. And the innocent public is paying for it. First of all, one of the main reason for which the public sector should be privatized is the awful reservation system in our country. If the reservation system will be continued with the same pace, then that day will come soon when we have employees only having their caste certificates and nothing else. Secondly, in private sector their is no management, no rules, no punctuality, no responsibility, nothing. We have heard it many times earlier that "government is blind". So I think its better to handover the whole control to one who is physically fit rather than a physically challenged one.
+1 -0

Shubha said: (Tue, Apr 23, 2013 01:39:37 PM)

Hi, dears. In my view points the public sector must be privatized, one of the reason is that, private companies are not only make profit but also contribute social welfare for society as a whole. If we take some example like atul industry, ongc, tata reliance and number of industries of foreign companies functioning in India are good example of their social contribution.
+0 -0

Shubha Pramanik said: (Mon, Apr 22, 2013 09:23:59 PM)

Dear Friends, Public sector should remain in the control of government, but its recruitment process and job performance should be monitored by the private sector and also provide the authority to suspend those persons who are corrupted, they may also work as a adviser to the government bodies.
+1 -0

Imran Kanjoo said: (Sun, Apr 14, 2013 10:21:11 PM)

Hi everyone. According to my point of view Public sector should remain in its original state, but there is a need to convert Private sector into Public sector. Why? Because in Private sector the organizations have their infrastructure well managed, and they are gaining profit in a sophisticated manner, If govt own the private sector there are more chances for India to flourish because of the more profit Govt will attain the more it will be utilized for the welfare of the natives of India. Despite Private sector is gaining so much but not using a single rupee on human welfare because they didn't aim for that, they aimed only for profit, Then why we need for them? they earn profit or not it will not make any effect on the life of individual compatriots. But keep in mind! It will only true if your ruling party wants to do something for Indians without making money for their own.

+1

-2

Subahan Shaik said: (Sun, Apr 14, 2013 07:57:19 PM)

Hi friends. According to my opinion public sectors should be privatized, because in private sectors there is no reservation and we cannot find that boon in private sectors and they will hire students who are having great strength of knowledge not reservation. But in public sectors they will hire only the students who are having reservation strength. Because of this most of the students who are having great knowledge migrating to foreign countries and they are helping those countries to grow up. Finally I conclude that if government take off these reservations in studies and public sector jobs definitely our country will reach to high position than other countries.

We Need Drinking Water and Not Coke & Pepsi in Rural India
Hi friends, I do agree with the topic. Drinking water is very much essential in daily life and it plays a major role concerned to the ecosystem of human beings. But whereas soft drinks like pepsi, coke will make a person cause to indefinite health hazardous and they are dangerous to ones life. At present most of the rural people are suffering a lot for not getting pure drinking water the govt has to take certain measurements to provide a pure drinking water to rural people.
Rate this: +1 -0

Devraj Yadav said: (Mon, Apr 1, 2013 12:47:28 PM)

Hi friends I am from rural areas, so I know better in about rural areas, WATER IS REQUIRED FOR MANKIND THIS IS VERY IMPORTANT for us. We can live without Pepsi or coke but no any one live without water, because Pepsi or coke made water also. There are 90 % of water in Pepsi or coke. So I can not imagination without water. Thank you.
Rate this: +8 -0

Vicky said: (Sun, Mar 17, 2013 10:04:26 PM)

I am So surprised about discussion about same, What Indian government is doing that we are going to discuss about said topic, One Side government runs many activity to aware to people, so why not activity like this not runs by government in rural area. Water is easily available to every where but something lacking in our system that's why we are disable to provide to every where, whereas government know about coke is harmful to human so why not doing aware to people.
Rate this: +4 -2

Vishal Kumar said: (Mon, Feb 18, 2013 06:01:05 PM)

Hello friend. I am agree with the topic because we know that water is the need of people on the other hand non-alcoholic things like Pepsi and coke are the demand of the people. Without full filling the need human beings does not survive. And the second think for Pepsi and coke we have ability to pay for it where in the case of water it is not required. Thank you.
Rate this: +17 -7

Roshan said: (Fri, Jan 4, 2013 11:05:35 AM)

Hi, Roshan here. I do agree with mentioned topic and gone through discussion where no.of people given there views and claimed direct on Govt for poor service in rural area. Though I do also agree with the same claims but no one has given any solution what govt should do against this demon situation. So here I go. 1) Govt should implement Prepaid water Scheme (Quantity of water of particular house-hold should be decided and given that much quantity only for mentioned period to concern house-hold). 2) If any particular need more water than define quantity he should have to pay more money than regular. 3) This help to lead govt to control wastage of water & improve awareness of necessity of pure water.
Rate this: +27 -11

Nishant Ahuja said: (Wed, Dec 26, 2012 03:19:49 PM)

Well I agree with the topic. We are living in a society where coke and Pepsi have penetrated to our rural counterpart but still drinking water is not. The possible reason I feel is Govt allow the manufacturers of coke and Pepsi to manufacture and distribute Coke and Pepsi in rural areas because Govt will get the revenues but for the basic amenities like Pure drinking water, Government will have to do spending. So the need for the rural India is pure drinking water and not coke and Pepsi as we know water is a fundamental unit of life and >80 % of the diseases occur due to drinking impure water

Indian Economy: Old Wine in New Bottle!

Hi, Today I'm speaking on the topic INDIAN ECONOMY AS THE OLD WINE IN NEW BOTTLE, I disagree with this statement. Indian economy is the new wine in the old bottle. The whole outline is old but the inner beauty is new, it's different from the ancient wine. Since 1991, liberalization, urbanization, globalization, has changed the Indian economy. Our economy is moving for better achievement. After independence Indian economy has raised its flag of success. The educated or literate people of India who are in now foreign countries should come in their country. Many Indians are working in other countries. They are working their for the development of that country. They are helping in to improve their economic conditions. But those Indian people who in other countries should come in their countries. They should come in India. It will help us to improve our economic conditions. We are seeing that by 1991 the Indian public sector and the private sector are booming in all over the world. These sectors are providing employment to the unemployed person but willing to do work. By this the economic condition is becoming better. Our country's GDP rate has been increasing. The literacy level of our country is also increasing. In the past years on our country only agriculture was in more use but now the manufacturing and service sector is in demand and making more profits. People have their talent and willingness to do work. Some new and intelligent politicians are in our country who visiting in the every state of our country and trying to the economic condition of every state. Therefore, I want to suggest that try to encourage our youngster by which they come forward help to change the wine very costly, so that nobody can destroy it!

Rate this:

+4

-2

Sant said: (Tue, Mar 19, 2013 05:04:30 PM)

Hi friends, Indian economy not depend on politics but politician depend on economics. In present time, if we want to corruption free India and growth of Indian economy, its a time for young and Dynamic peoples to come into Politics.
Rate this: +25 -1

Anuj Agarwal said: (Fri, Mar 15, 2013 12:24:49 PM)

The essence of the topic is do our economy stands at the same position from where it started only the time being new. This phrase can be relevant in the sense that still the people are poor, still distribution of income is not even. But I think though the basic problem of Indian economy remains the same but the economy itself has changed a lot. If we compare today's GDP with what it was 50 years back, there is massive difference. Today it is one of the second fastest growing economy in the world. Before we had this problem but our economy did not had resource. Today our economy has the resource but not the proper men who should distribute the resource. India's black money deposit in Swiss bank is expected to be 13 times its current total borrowing. So what we can see is economy is not the same but the problem remains the same because of emergence of new kind of religion called 'CORRUPTION'.
Rate this: +4 -0

Amas said: (Sun, Mar 10, 2013 04:46:22 PM)

Hi guys, First of I will say that a good phrase is use for present politics condition. This is suitable tag for present. I think that corruption is continuously run from a long time before and every talks about it. But they all forget there rolls in empowering of this bane. Today's new generation participate in politics but when new wine (new generation) shows that there is no standing position of them in front of old wine than do not try to stand against of old wine. New wine get mix in the taste of old wine and become old wine. So here we can say that the bottles are new but wine is still old, my dear. That's all.
Rate this: +6 -2

Sudhir Hansda said: (Tue, Mar 5, 2013 12:32:00 AM)

Indian economy is a big economy and this economy is going down instead of growth. Blaming The Indian minister for this is not good because we are also responsible for it. Instead of Blaming On other if we do our job with full attention for the nation then Indian economy will map on it way. If we educate the people of rural areas as well as the urban area to give at least 20% time for nation. Then it may enhanced. Thank you.

Rate this:

+7

-0

Irish said: (Sun, Feb 10, 2013 11:15:50 PM)

India is a rich country really if we use our resources in proper way. The next thing is to educate people for which we can decrease our population which is a great issue in today. If more and more people will be educated then they would become more responsible for our country and know their rights for which they can also help to decrease the level of corruption. Not to export our resources to foreign countries. To provide job opportunity to people. For which people became more self dependent. If we take an example of china in that country the people give their 80% time to themselves and 20% time for their country but in India people give all their 100% time for themselves. For which we would not think about our country and its development at all. So we should think about our country their people as a whole. Thank you.
Rate this: +8 -3

Irish said: (Sun, Feb 10, 2013 11:04:55 PM)

I think we should not blame others for the poverty that growing day to day and also the worst political leaders way of guiding which leads to corruption. We should 1st aware about what will be the right way to drive the economic and political ethics. The 1st thing is to promote the educational facility in rural areas for which they would also able to understand their rights as well as duties. Then 2nd our country has lot of valuable resource which our country always used to export to the foreign countries and other countries use our resources to become more powerful economically. So we should not export these valuable resources which our country has. Each n every person should aware about his/her duties, responsibility as well as rights for which they will come forward to help others and our country as a whole. So its not to blame others if we are doing so not tried to capable ourselves for our duties then our country can't be developed. So 1st thing is to develop ourselves n dedicated towards our duties for our country. And by which we can decrease the level of corruption in our country. And can have foreign black money back to our country. Thank you.
Rate this: +7 -3

Priya said: (Sun, Nov 25, 2012 11:18:57 AM)

India is a democratic country so each development and losses are also related with people. If we are dealing with Indian economy how could we blame the leaders only we people are equal part of this. Corruption is not but only done by them but we are also doing. In present time many youth are selected as our leader so basically it is right to say old wine in new bottle. Corruption Chiradip ghosh 09-10-2012 04:19 AM Corruption Like Cancer what makes us a dead body day by day . Now a days 60% people face it and atlast they give up . If u get a valueable marks as a student , but without contribute money you can't get a good job. RE: Corruption gagan gaikwad 10-17-2012 01:58 AM now a days , corruption is as part of human being , & itis dengerous for us . if every people i am not correpted and work honestly then some persentage of currution we can remove from society. RE: Corruption Akanksha 11-17-2012 07:42 AM corruption leads to the deterioration of our economy. and ofcourse this is not acceptable for a good citizen. we have to throw it out. about 62% indians are corrupted thru out the country. Mark Twain once said that corruption is like weather. everyone knws bou it bt no one can do anythng bou it. but we have to protect ourselves jus as we protect ourselves from diff weathers. we have to create good people more in ratio than corrupted people to make our govt corruption free. n then we can become a developed country.

RE: Corruption Akanksha 11-17-2012 07:44 AM corruption leads to the deterioration of our economy. and ofcourse this is not acceptable to a good citizen. we have to throw it out. about 62% indians are corrupted thru out the country. Mark Twain once said that corruption is like weather. everyone knws bou it bt no one can do anythng bou it. but we have to protect ourselves jus as we protect ourselves from diff weathers. we have to create good people more in ratio than corrupted people to make our govt corruption free. n then we can become a developed country. RE: Corruption Shreyan 11-25-2012 09:38 PM As pollution and population, corruption become a new headache to our country. though there is no solution "balm" for such a headache, and we the aam-aadmis are facing the main problem. A formerly studious and meritorious student didnt get a job if his father is out of his pocket. Nowadays in India there is no one to praise, but hidden to press for money. As per latest news in India approximately 63% Indians are corrupted. The corrupted father should know that their sons are being corrupted from them and in future if the man goes to the department his son may raise his left hand for the solution he is seeking for. At last I'll say, though I know no one will care for it, "NO! I am Indian. I'm proud I'm Indian. I'll stand my country first not for CORRUPTION, but as INCREDIBLE amongst the incredibles for a fresh one in mind." RE: Corruption venkata Radhika 11-27-2012 08:57 PM corruption is spiritual or moral impurity or deviation from an ideal. Corruption entails many forms including bribery and embezzlement. Government corruption occurs when an elected representative makes decisions that are influenced by vested interest rather than their own personal or party ideological beliefs. Corruption can occur on many different scales. There is corruption that occurs as small favours between a small number of people (petty corruption), while there is the corruption that affects the government on a large scale (grand corruption), and corruption that is so prevalent that it is part of the every day structure of society (systemic corruption). Government/ Public Sector Public sector corruption is one of the more dangerous forms of corruption as corruption of the governing body can lead to widespread effects. Legislative System (Political) Political corruption is the abuse of public power, office, or resources by elected government officials for personal gain, e.g. by extortion, soliciting or offering bribes[6] It can also take the form of office holders maintaining themselves in office by purchasing votes by enacting laws which use taxpayers' money.[7] Executive System (Police) Police corruption is a specific form of police misconduct designed to obtain financial benefits, other personal gain, and/or career advancement for a police officer or officers in exchange for not pursuing, or selectively pursuing, an investigation or arrest. One common form of police corruption is soliciting and/or accepting bribes in exchange for not reporting organized drug or prostitution rings or other illegal activities. Another example is police officers flouting the police code of conduct in order to secure convictions of suspects for example, through the use of falsified evidence. More rarely, police officers may deliberately and systematically participate in organized crime themselves. In most major cities, there are internal affairs sections to investigate suspected police corruption or misconduct. Similar entities include the British Independent Police Complaints Commission. Judiciary System Judicial Corruption refers to corruption related misconduct of judges, through receiving or giving bribes, improper sentencing of convicted criminals, bias in the hearing and judgement of arguments and other such misconduct. Governmental corruption of judiciary is broadly known in many transitional and developing countries because the budget is almost completely controlled by the executive. The latter undermines the separation of powers, as it creates a critical financial dependence of the judiciary. The proper national wealth distribution including the government spending on the judiciary is subject of the constitutional economics. It is important to distinguish between the two methods of corruption of the judiciary: the government (through budget planning and various privileges), and the private.[8] Corporate As corporations and business entities grow larger, sometimes with a monetary turnover many times that of small countries, the threat of corruption in the business world, within the organisation, in dealings with other organisations and in dealings with the government is a looming and growing threat.[citation needed]Companies may indulge in political corruption. Unions Labour unions were formed to protect and further the rights of employees via collective bargaining. However, as with other entities, corruption has been known to happen within the organisations. In addition, some unions have been infiltrated by, or associated with organised crime syndicates. Non-Government Organisations NGOs and other non-profit organisations are not immune to corruption and may be linked to political corruption. Different Methods of corruption Bribery Embezzlement, Theft and Fraud

Extortion and Blackmail Abuse of Discretion Favouritism, Nepotism and Clientelism Improper Political Contributions RE: Corruption ashita 12-30-2012 12:58 PM corruption is one of the main issue of our country . Those country in which most of the coruption in politicians than what is the future of country????? this is the big question......one side a normal man(aam admi) earn money with honesty ,pay proper taxes...on the other side politicians, leaders are invest black money..... RE: Corruption Gazal Sachdeva 01-31-2013 08:51 AM To remove corruption from the society every citizen of the country must actively take participate in this agitation of making India corruption less......every citizen must understand start working at their own......

Depreciation of Indian Rupee has only negative impact on the economy

For - Due to European financial crisis the value of Rupee has been depreciated which has resulted in an increase in the value of dollar. Thus, affecting the economy. - The demand of dollar has increased in contrast to that of Rupee and has startled our economy. - It has resulted in the depreciation of the Purchasing Power Parity (PPP). - Depreciation of Indian Rupee has resulted in increase in inflation and thus, stagnant growth of the economy. - Dollar is being appreciated amongst all the currencies including Rupee and has marked an increase in its buyers. - These frailties and volatilities among the European market is sure to have an impact in the entire Asian markets including India. - Government would have to pay more in terms of Rupee for its imports. This would lead to rise in fiscal deficit which in turn will raise the level of inflation. Against - The exporters gain from the depreciation of Rupee as they get more of the local currency in exchange of the foreign one. - The depreciating value of Rupee is like a boon to Indian IT sectors as it generates more than 80% of their revenue from overseas market and this will enhance their actual realization of revenue. - Emigrants living outside India also benefits from this depreciation.

Consistency is the last refuge of the unimaginative - Group Discussion Group Discussion 06-14-2012 08:30 AM Consistency is the last refuge of the unimaginative, reflects both positive and negative attitude. We all are expected to be consistent at work. This doesnt make us unimaginative. So, it is just the way we look at this word and the context in which it is being used. For: - Consistency reflects lack of imagination because you are used to a certain routine. - You limit and bind yourself with certain protocols that dont allow you to think out of the box. - When you are constantly doing the same thing, it leads to boredom and monotony.

- Being consistent makes things easier. You dont take risks. You always try to achieve things the same way because you feel results might be the same. There is no unpredictability. - If you are inconsistent, you will make mistakes and learn. You will develop different notions to work things out. Against: - There are certain things which have to have to be done in a certain way with defined set of rules. For e.g. in an event of economic crisis, we expect the prices of commodities to rise. - Even imaginative people can be consistent. There are certain things they do consistently to get results. - Consistency cannot always be taken negatively. We can be consistent good as well. - We are expected to perform well consistently. This doesnt mean we are not imaginative. - Consistency could be the last refuge. But, not the first. Perhaps people are driven to be in circumstances that leave them with no choice but, to be consistent. We can safely say that probably unimaginative people are consistent. But, it could be deceiving to say that inconsistent people are unimaginative. Inconsistency at times may be developed out of no choice or could be temporary.

olyXFjATKKwvXB Daniel 08-2-2012 12:50 AM A friend with great ingihst into tibetan-mongolian culture told me she is wearing the same hat, corals and decorations as the Khampa or Golog woman of eastern Tibet, now Chinas Qinghai province.They constitute a fiercer tribe and live as nomads.Has she been there on holiday?Where is the inspiration taken from?Is she a Dalai Lama follower now instead of that bloke Gurdjieff?

FDI in Retail - Will really affect the farmers of India? - Group Discussion Group Discussion 06-26-2012 02:00 AM For - Farmers might have to shut down their farms due to corporatization of the farming sector. - It has divided Indias social, political and trading classes. It works on the divide and rule concept. - It would mean depreciation of Indian money which will have a negative impact on the economy. - The retailers will have an enormous control over their suppliers and indirectly affecting the farmers. - This kind of structure would result in reduced farm prices and thus, closure of farms. - It will have disastrous consequences on the Indian farmers as buyers will have total control over the sellers according to this policy. - FDI will let some major players emerge in the retail segment. Big retail outlets will enjoy monopoly in selling and in buying as well. This means that the poor farmers will not have much optiona to sell their crop in the market causing them to lower their selling price and shrink the margins. Against - It will be profitable to the farmers as middlemen will give them a better price for their goods. - Farmers will get an opportunity to supply their produce to the big chains directly rather than going through intermediate brokers. - The induction of the foreign investors will definitely help the small traders i.e. the farmers. - It will deepen the economic cooperation between India and US.

- Agricultural products will form a very small percentage of the products these retail outlets would sell. The majority of products will be the finished goods. Snce these retail chains will source these products from China and other countries, more than farmers this will affect our local industries.

RE: FDI in Retail - Will really affect the farmers of India? - Group Discussion Meenakshi singh 10-6-2012 03:49 AM The FDI in retail will help the farmers in improving their financial conditions and it will provide a platform to the small businesses to showcase their products via these retailers. The farmers will get the real prices for their products.

RE: FDI in Retail - Will really affect the farmers of India? - Group Discussion Gaurav Gupta 10-16-2012 04:49 AM 51% FDI, In Multi brand retail , will help farmers most, as supply chain infrastructure of , india is so poor, and coldstorage capacity is also minimun, india is bulk ptoducer of potato, tomato, as a reason they are rotten and farmers have to sold them in lower price, and meditaors give less price then actual price. fdi in retail ,will remove all the medidators and try to five maximum benefits to farmers, and end consumer Gaurav Gupta 09527214155 09527214155

RE: FDI in Retail - Will really affect the farmers of India? - Group Discussion gaikwad 10-17-2012 02:06 AM yes , it will affect ,now adays many farmers are in truble due to ecosystem . fd in retail helps them or give them chance to truble shoot by giving them fd . and they will able to strat their work,

RE: FDI in Retail - Will really affect the farmers of India? - Group Discussion Ravinder Dahiya 11-16-2012 12:21 PM How can we say that FDI in retail sector will be fruitful for Indian economy, because if fdi is permitted then small will be removed from the market and it creates unemployment. Income generated by foreign investors transferred from India to outside india., most of the income transferred to foreign countries so indian economy cann't develop throgh FDI.

RE: FDI in Retail - Will really affect the farmers of India? - Group Discussion Ravinder Dahiya 11-16-2012 12:23 PM How can we say that FDI in retail sector will be fruitful for Indian economy, because if fdi is permitted then small vendors will be removed from the market and it creates unemployment. Income generated by foreign investors transferred from India to outside india., most of the income transferred to foreign countries so indian economy cann't develop through FDI.

RE: FDI in Retail - Will really affect the farmers of India? - Group Discussion ashita 12-30-2012 01:12 PM as we know everything which exist have positive as well as negative aspect...from fdi in retail farmers give proper rate for their product because from this.... eliminate the intermidiater for selling but on the other side small vendors are also remove which lead to unemployment.....

RE: FDI in Retail - Will really affect the farmers of India? - Group Discussion vipul gupta 01-12-2013 01:51 PM ok fdi in retail help indian farmer, but it directly affect unemployment towards small vendors which account 15% of india GDP.

RE: FDI in Retail - Will really affect the farmers of India? - Group Discussion piyali 02-10-2013 10:32 AM it will definitely affect the incomes of the farmers as they will be exploited to the fullest by the big retail chains. they will not get a chance to sell their products at the price they want to........

RE: FDI in Retail - Will really affect the farmers of India? - Group Discussion sourabh singh 03-5-2013 10:41 AM if we are in favor of fdi then it has no doubt that we would get a golden chance to have a longest interaction with the world's most developed country,till now we never experienced so...

Facebooking - Time pass actitivity.

For - It definitely is a time pass activity as it contains lots of fun activities, like games that are used by people on a regular basis to get out of their boredom. - Being a social networking site it is just a means of communication where people can make new friends or connect with long lost friends. - People become so addictive towards it that they spend most of their time socializing via facebook. - People meet new people; make new relationships through this network which increases the healthy interactions among them. Against - Individuals connect through facebook to their co-workers or colleagues which helps them to remain up to date. - Facebook is used to advertise products which are relatively new in the market and can be easily purchased through facebook. - It is good way to update people about the recent events taking place nearby or in the world. - Facebook being a quick and effective way of communicating (people separated by time zones) can not be termed as a time pass activity. - Facebook teaches a lot of new aspects about different websites.

RE: Facebooking : A time pass actitivity - Group Discussion M.DHAMODARAN 07-9-2012 11:20 PM dhamodaran

RE: Facebooking : A time pass actitivity - Group Discussion Pranay 07-31-2012 02:21 PM It is wrong to say that facebook is a time pass activity.It is simply wastage of time. Most of the students are wasting there time in fb during there exam also . Instead of doing there home work,they are doing fb as there daily work. It is just like an addiction which simply takes a student to the darkest corner of their life. But if it is used in a limit just to get connected with each other while living in distance , then it is a good one. They can have their friends or relatives in their list and have a little talk . It is just like a coin which have both head and tail .As we know it is the nature of humans to take the negative part quicker than the positive one with few people in exception. So , it should be used by students in a limit or under the guidance of their parents.

Manarega - A key to increase employment in the country.

For - It is a scheme which provides legal guarantee for jobs or employment to the rural sector of our country. - There is an increase in the number of people who are willing to do manual work for a minimum wage which has resulted in an increase in employment. - It improves the purchasing power of the rural community, encouraging them to do work. - Women have also come out and are now consist of more than one-third of the stipulated force. Further increasing the number of people employed. - Rural people have shed their fear of coming outside and have started to work towards the development of the nation as they are getting wages, which is encouraging other unemployed people to work as well. Against - It is criticized as it is thought to be no more effective than the other employment programs that have been enlisted in the system. - It has resulted in more corrupt officials which resulted in deficit in the source of funds. - This is not effective as it has resulted in poor quality of infrastructure and has an unintended destructive effect on poverty. - This scheme doesnt teach new skills to the unemployed that is necessary for the development of t he country. - The conditions that are provided to the rural people are not sufficient to lure them to get employed.

RBI can not control inflation with its temporary monetary policies.
For - Inflation is not a spontaneous reaction it builds up over time and is caused by various reasons, thus temporary policies to control inflation is not going to be effective. - Temporary policies will contain it but will not eradicate the problem of inflation from its root. - Controlling inflation with its temporary monetary policies will result in deterioration of growth and development. - Temporary monetary policies would result in moderation of inflation over time but it will still remain above tolerance level. - There are various concerns over the fiscal deficit; the current account deficit and deteriorating asset quality loom large. - The food inflation has resulted in the rise of prices of fuel and other commodities which accentuated domestic inflationary pressures. Against - The temporary policies have reduced the stress on the economic frailties that had restricted the growth somewhat. - RBI has increased the repo rate or the rate at which it lends money to other banks which is one way to deal with inflation and has worked efficiently. - Temporary policies that have been implied is due to the fact that supply shocks are temporary and they are the main reason driving inflation. - It allows the bank and private sectors to adjust to the high interest rate gradually.

Nokia and Microsoft are a planned alliance or desperate move?

For - Nokia and Microsoft are a planned alliance as they both require each other to make something new of substantial quality. - Nokia has the technology to make a better smart phone whereas Microsoft has the support of the online features that are required for the promotion of this new technology. - They are forming an alliance just to ensure their power and collective leadership on the market. - It is a very good strategy implied by these two power companies to match the innovative smart phones made by other companies such as Apple and Android. - These two companies if brought together will bring in some tremendous products which will help them compete on the global scale. Against - It is a desperate move as both these are companies are giants in their own world and they do not need an alliance to promote themselves. - Nokias attempts to create better and innovative smart phones have been all but in vain. - Microsoft on the other hand has also been unsuccessful in taking the world by storm by its launch of mobile OS, which was termed as ridicule. - Apple and Android are two massive brands that stand as the main dominant force in the market of smart phones. Thus, making huge companies like Nokia and Microsoft to combine forces to dominate the market.

Is Inflation always harmful?

For - Inflation is a measure of economy whether shrinking or growing but mostly inflation results in shrinking of the economy. - It results in increase in prices of the day to day commodities. - It also increases the interest rates, loans and other means by which the people are borrowing or lending money. Thus, hurting regular people more. - It creates confusion, uncertainty leading to less investment and low international competitiveness. - It leads to decline in income called as stagnant wage growth. Against - Inflation is not harmful as it acts as a symptom for growing economy. - Inflation allows prices of various commodities to adjust according to the budget of the consumers. - It results in people or the seller making good amount of profit which in turn boosts the economy. EU Zone Crisis - reason for rising value of dollar. - Group Discussion Group Discussion 06-26-2012 01:54 AM For - It is a very distinct form of martial arts which has a blend of all the arts, thus it should be welcomed and should be made more popular. - Mixed martial art is a new trend of martial arts which would also allow people knowing it to showcase their talent. - It will promote the lost cultures of various forms of martial arts. - It will also boost the economy of our country as more and more people would participate in such events. - It will bring in more knowledge about this kind of sport to a country like India and it will increase the understanding of the combat-

effective strategies. - There are various rules implemented to protect the fighters from fatal or any kind of injury. Against - This form of martial arts is very dangerous for the people doing it as the rules are kept minimal. - The overall injury rate caused in MMA is more than other combat sports due to various techniques used in it. - It is also more fatal than any other combat sport. Viral Marketing should be encouraged - Group Discussion Group Discussion 06-26-2012 02:03 AM For - It will definitely result in an exponential growth of the market and thus, economy. - It will mean more exposure of our market on the global stage which will influence our economy. - It provides effortless transfers of media to others while scaling easily from small to very large quantities. - It is a very powerful advantage of the digital media which encourages sharing of content helping in campaigns and forming platforms for it. - It is a great way to motivate millions of people and to ascertain them with a digital message that needs to be circled. Against - It can be used out by various anonymous groups to give out wrong and false details which could create panic. - A rumor can also be spread through viral marketing and as the news spreads like a virus, it is sure to cause panic among people. - The terrorists can easily use it for creating a false alarm and making a chaos amongst people. - If done through SMS or internet, it leads to clogging the servers uselessly. India - really the NexGen superpower - Group Discussion Group Discussion 06-26-2012 02:08 AM For - India has the mass labour and production which can take India to a next level. - India has already put a stamp of authority in the IT sector and is ready to reach the world stage to find a place in manufacturing. - India has entrepreneurship and leadership capabilities which are of utmost importance in creating a successful nation and a super power. - Economic liberalization has resulted in the rise of the growth rates of the middles class which is a good indication for India. Against - India has shown a slowdown in economy which has really affected its chances of becoming a super power. - It also depends on how one defines super power. India is still under massive poverty and unemployment which again looms over Indias development. - Corruption in India is deterrent and is one of the major causes of Indias faltered growth. - Infrastructure such as rails, roads is still of major concern in India and it needs to be dealt with. - Politicians are creating a vacuum in the society with their deep buried corruption. - The government has failed to handle the economic growth which has widened the gap between the poor and the rich.

Is the Patents Bill Good for India?

I think most of the time the inventor don't have capability in terms of finance or business knowledge even though his invention is fabulous and can prove a boon for society so patent and involvement of mnc will help the invention in reaching the masses. India is known for 'Jugaad' & brilliant mind which leads to development of new thing (we call it invention). So patent will prove good for India and Indian people. To control its disadvantage proper monitoring is required.
Rate this: +3 -0

Anuj Agarwal said: (Wed, Mar 13, 2013 05:38:40 PM)

I think patent bill for any country is of utmost importance and so is for India. India being a land of art & culture, this assumes even greater importance. In the absence of patent bill a person's zeal to invent is also killed. Also in the absence of patent bill our skilled resources would be shifting to other countries to get their invention patented and to showcase their talent. But for those inventions which benefits the society at large, patenting is not required. In that case the person should be allowed to receive a certain part of profit but must not be given exclusive right so that everyone enjoys the benefit of innovation.
Rate this: +12 -0

Amiya said: (Mon, Jan 7, 2013 08:44:01 PM)

According my point of view Patent bill is good for India. As it encourages inventor to discover or invent new things in medicine. It helps poor student to show their talent through new invention as well as remove various critical disease of human being. The duplicate medicine can be easily identified. But for poor people the govt of India should make relaxation in patent bills.
Rate this: +12 -6

Saurabh Sengar said: (Sat, Nov 10, 2012 12:25:51 PM)

Patent bill will promote entrepreneurship which is the need of densely populated and developing country like India, but certain provisions should be made to avoid any kind of monopoly which might lead to black marketing. Some rules can be made like some some share of profit to be given to its entrepreneur by others producing the same stuff. This will help both.
Rate this: +20 -3

Saurabh Sengar said: (Fri, Nov 9, 2012 01:04:12 PM)

It is good for any budding talent and will promote entrepreneurship. Which is what any densely populated and developing country like India will need. But government must also see that it doesn't leads to any form of black marketing. 1 IDEA from my side "it should be allowed to be produced by others with some amount of profits to be paid to its respective entrepreneur" this will avoid monopoly and the deserving will get its due credit.
Rate this: +6 -3

Indrajit said: (Sat, Nov 3, 2012 10:47:53 PM)

Hi friends. I support all of your views that patient bill is important. It is important for development new technology. Because if patent bill isn't there someone's invention is theft by other. And the inventor will not get the right price of his/her work. But though it have some bad side also. For example in pharma industry some company invented a new medicine of a certain disease their is no competition they can hike the product price as they will and the sufferer will be the common people. So the patient bill is needed but government must monitor the companies new inventions should be reached our common people properly.

Public Sector being a Guarantor of Job Security is a Myth

Public sector has very lazy guys who come home for lunch and sleep 2 hrs and then go office again pack up his belongings and back to home as tired face a lot. Where as private sector each and every guy will have his/her responsibility to meet the goals. In public sector officers are offered bribe to sign on a document or move file further. There is no proper task or goal for them. So day by day they becoming lazy than private sector. Private sector depends on skilled/intelligent resources. Where as public sector unskilled/reservation/bribe/lazy/no goal/no aim/slow and study win the race like. My opinion most of the skilled guys will look into join in corporate and earn money with in short period of time than govt employee who will be earning life long. Now a days ANDHRAPRADESH GOVT removed pension scheme also who joined after 2004. This is another drawback. So skilled guys favors towards pvt sector. :).
Rate this: +0 -0

Kunal Bansal said: (Tue, Apr 2, 2013 11:08:31 PM)

I think the private sector is better than public sector because of these 3 points: 1) In private sector one has to complete the work in the stipulate time, with that one has realization of the responsibility of his/her work. 2) In private sector the promotion is based on your performance while in public the promotion is given after certain deadline. 3) Private sector provides fruitful and encouraging working environment.
Rate this: +8 -7

Yogesh said: (Thu, Mar 28, 2013 07:52:50 PM)

First of all thanks for providing us with such a relevant topic. According to me private sector are more secure than public sector because the most important thing is that private sector in our country contribute about 70 percent of (GDP) gross domestic product and also private sector grooms you in a way that even in the tough situation employee can survive because of the hard work and dedication it makes overall development for an individual whereas public sector only makes an employee work less and become lazy.
Rate this: +3 -4

Rahul said: (Thu, Mar 21, 2013 08:07:34 AM)

As far as I concerned public sectors are 100% secure while compared with private sectors. Now a days every one can see lots of health problems for this privatized sector guys because of heavy work load, high tensions, day to day cutoffs, obesity etc because of the imbalance in their mind set all these diseases are occurring mostly to these guys. Where as in public sectors salary is fixed, less work load, less tensions, no high pressures from head offices, no

cutoffs nothing. Just going to office by 9:30 or 10 AM and leaving office by 6 pm that's it its a peaceful life in public sectors. And also the national holidays are any other holidays are plenty for public sectors where as for private sectors adequate number of holidays. Though they got holidays they have no time to spend with family they have to work in leave days also i.e., WORK IN HOME. If the manager is not satisfied in you and your work he may have authority to quit you from his company at any time without your presence but in public sector it is not possible he must bear us till our retirement. THAT'S WHY PUBLIC SECTORS ARE HIGHLY SECURED in my view.
Rate this: +28 -1

Nikhil Shriwas said: (Fri, Mar 15, 2013 02:13:03 PM)

Hello friends, It is known to all that both public and private sector employees are commendable in their works. Jobs for public sector is not 100% secured. The one who does not do his work well, can be responsible to fire or it can be degraded at his actual post. And yes who is working very hard is depend upon his/her skill, intelligence, and hard work, but not by his/her sector where they work.
Rate this: +5 -4

Sandeep said: (Mon, Mar 4, 2013 10:56:46 PM)

I agree with all of you friends, but beg to defer that public sector is guarantor of job. Today, persons with recognized reputed highly qualified professions like CA is also searching for job. Condition is as such that they are even working at a salary of Rs 10000 or so. Its hard to believe but courses like ca is recognized as toughest and then also no job is being offered, no matter it is public sector or private or practicing firm. No one can give assurance for any job. Its one's own knowledge, experience, hard work and full dedication to their work which give them job.
Rate this: +8 -3

Rakesh said: (Mon, Feb 25, 2013 09:38:24 AM)

Hi to all, As per I concern, if a person need just a job, public sector is better, but if a person need improvement in his life in all the sectors and he need more earnings definitely private sector is better.
Rate this: +12 -5

Sandeep Yadav said: (Thu, Feb 21, 2013 08:34:40 PM)

According to my opinion public sector is more better than private sector. Private industry can fire at any time. When company not have the project not or not have the money to pay then company put on bench or stop remuneration.

In public sector not only job security but also lots of facility like family health care retirement allowance and much time to do extra curricular activity and social work but in private sector it is not possible.
Rate this: +6 -7

Meenal said: (Mon, Dec 3, 2012 12:11:04 PM)

Hello friends, I am Meenal and according to my point of view that public sector is better than private sector, because in public sector there is more job security than private sector. You can see at the time of recession many private organisations have cut their jobs or they demoted their employees or stopped giving increments to their employee but these type of effects have not been seen in public sector.

Is the Consumer really the King in India?

I agree with this statement consumer is really king of India. All business is depend upon customer choice. Businessman made their product according to consumer choice. We have seen lots of big business ruined just because of consumer dissatisfaction. Thus customer is centric and we are the king.
Rate this: +2 -0

Tamanna Mansukhani said: (Sun, Apr 21, 2013 05:25:06 PM)

Hello all, I completely agree with the statement that consumers are ultimately the king of market since nowadays the products are designed, manufactured and are allowed to come in market as per customers requirements. Organisations nowadays are going through the research process according to the needs and demands of customers. There is a cut-throat competition between large scale companies to satisfy the needs of customers thereby having profit to the organisation. Nowadays consumers have complete right to sue the company whenever they are cheated or treated ill. Consumers courts sue the organisation and favours the customers so that he can get all his rights and could be serviced in well manner as they are paying for the products whatever they are purchasing they should be given full authority and right to speak up. So ultimately consumers are real king of market without proper consumer satisfaction no organisation can make profit.
Rate this: +1 -0

Poonam said: (Sun, Apr 21, 2013 09:23:11 AM)

Hi Friends, According to me consumer is really king of India. Companies are selling and manufacturing the products according to consumers if consumers is happy with product they will launch new products as consumer demand. We have seen lots of big businessman's business went to ruin because they couldn't satisfy customer. Even in IT companies Employee worked what the client want.
Rate this: +0 -0

Ranjeet said: (Fri, Apr 19, 2013 01:38:02 AM)

I totally agree with this that consumer is king in the market because any organising in the market who is providing good or service to consumer are totally based on consumer if the consumer is not happy with the service which are offered to them than they are not going to buy that service or goods and in this scenario company will suffer loss.
Rate this: +3 -0

Moin said: (Thu, Apr 18, 2013 11:00:18 AM)

No doubt consumers are king because products are made, design and shaped according to the need and preferences of the buyers/consumers, if the products fails to satisfy the buyers need then company will suffer a huge loss and may result in total shutdown. A consumer may fire any officials from lower level authority to higher officials just simply by spending money at somewhere else.
Rate this: +2 -0

Upendra said: (Wed, Apr 17, 2013 09:31:34 AM)

Customer is king in any open market. If we remember the famous quote of Mahatma Gandhi which says "A customer is the most important visitor on our premises. He is not dependent on us. We are dependent on him. He is not an interruption in our work. He is the purpose of it. He is not an outsider in our business. He is part of it. We are not doing him a favor by serving him. He is doing us a favor by giving us an opportunity to do so". A satisfied customer not only give scope for future business with him but also brings many more customers by way of mouth publicity. So certainly customer is king in today's competitive market. He is the only profit and rest others are liabilities.
Rate this: +5 -0

Praveen Jain said: (Sun, Apr 14, 2013 10:39:01 AM)

The consumer is really the king, is true. You start from the ancient times, the products which have come into existence are as per requirement of the consumer. Even in the present day world the companies first identify the need of the consumer and then design the product as per his requirement. The company which have introduced any product without proper research, failed to get proper response and sales. There are several examples of success and failures to prove this point. In mobiles, motorola failed, nokia succeed but failed later, when they missed the sight. Samsung won apple failed to some extent. In airlines kingfisher the example.
Rate this: +2 -0

Pallavi Mahajan said: (Fri, Apr 12, 2013 12:18:03 PM)

There is a Famous saying by a SAM WALTON (WAL-MART Founder) : " There is only one Boss :The Customer. And he can fire everybody in the Company- from Chairman on down, simply by spending his money somewhere else. ". A company exists only because of a customer or consumer. The ultimate buyer is a customer, products are made according to the customers not customers are made out of products. Firstly the demand is measured and it is the customer who creates the demand.
Rate this: +6 -0

Sharat K Malick said: (Fri, Apr 12, 2013 09:35:02 AM)

Customer is king but in a limited sense. Although all the activities of business are revolving round him; keeping his needs in the center. But often the business man or companies make a web thorough advertisement, showmanship, glamour etc. And the poor customer got confused to choose for his best. His decision is influenced by tactical strategies of the advertising, sale promotion (grand sale) etc. And he lost his position of being a king. He becomes more or less a tool in the hands of the companies. The companies can sell him

anything or everything not required by the customer and he loses his position as a king. Further, at times such sales tactics do not provide him after sale services which is otherwise a right of the customer. So friends be aware of your rights and avoid falling into the trap of companies advertisements and prove yourself be the actual king. Be smart and purchase smartly.

Are Indians Less Quality Conscious?

I would like express my views on this topic also. India is a developing country. Some people are poor. Some are mediocre and some are rich. Rich people not compromise with quality. But poor people need food in their respected money. Quality doesn't matter for them. On the other hand mediocre also exist here. For mediocre quality depends upon their salary and and mindset. If their pocket allow they will go with quality otherwise not. But nowadays things are changing middle class people are going with quality. They think they will buy less thing but of good quality. In short India people purchasing power and mindset depends upon people they will go with quality or not.
Rate this: +1 -0

Nitin said: (Fri, Apr 12, 2013 03:05:19 PM)

I would say that it depends upon the level of education and the paper he earns. No matter how much he earns if he is not aware of Armani etc, he won't purchase it and on the other side if a person is well educated yet does not earn enough, will not go for high quality items when he can go with substandard. Hence, a combination of both is necessary which India lacks a lot. So yes I do agree with the topic.
Rate this: +0 -1

Zorro said: (Sun, Apr 7, 2013 04:04:38 PM)

Being quality conscious means only considering quality as a parameter at the time of purchasing goods or services. But Indians are not only quality conscious but also price sensitive. Like everyone we need quality at lowest possible prices. Rich and upper middle class families never compromise on quality but poor and lower middle class families do compromise at certain point of a time. Most of the Indian population being poor hardly consider quality because for them even if they get meals twice a day is enough for them. So it can be said that rich Indian people are quality conscious whereas people with low income aren't. Thus it can only be said that Most of the Indians are less quality conscious and not all of them. Thank you.
Rate this: +10 -0

Ankush Jaggi said: (Sun, Apr 7, 2013 01:06:45 PM)

Hello friends, I totally agree with topic as we Indians are not quality conscious. Thing is India is such a diverse country one cannot simply generalize any thought. There are folks which belong to wealthier class and from middle class, vast share of India's population comes from poor background (BPL families). Yes, us Indians do care about quantity many a times and it is basically comes down to one's perspective of things and richer lot will always go for quality and other lot will always go for economic thing. There is one great thing about us Indians is that whatever we are getting we are more than happy and in hard times we are all together and we show a never die spirit.

Rate this:

+0

-1

Manisha Bhattacharya said: (Fri, Apr 5, 2013 11:35:12 PM)

Hello friends, The topic is Indians are less quality conscious, as per my concern this is totally wrong. I just want to divide the peoples of India in two parts 1st who comes under rich families, middle class and the poor one. It is quite obvious that rich people does not care about money obviously they will buy quality products problem will occur with middle and poor families it will depend upon their income. 2nd category who comes under uneducated rich people like people who lives in villages they do not have any idea regarding the quality and quantity. They look for the quantity only. And another 1 more thing is that the mentality in India that people think that high price products are only good in quality but it is always not true. THANK YOU.
Rate this: +5 -1

Sathya Shivam said: (Thu, Apr 4, 2013 08:27:12 PM)

Hai friends, First I have to say something about the given topic "are indians less quality conscious". It should not be decided based on the nationality. It should be decided based on the economic strength of the people. If you earn more obviously you go for best product in the market, if not, you choose what you are able to buy. Is all the persons in USA (developed nation) are quality conscious? no. It is depend on the income of the individual and his character.
Rate this: +27 -2

Apurva said: (Mon, Apr 1, 2013 03:09:32 AM)

Hi Friends, I think we people are quality conscious but in low price which is bearable. Also, we people want to spend more money in quality instead of quantity. Now a days we are using brand products instead of using local product. We are using packed articles instead of open products. We are importing different different articles to our country which is increasing. This shows that we turned our faces towards quality instead of quantity. Thanks.
Rate this: +5 -1

Shanmuganathan said: (Fri, Mar 29, 2013 10:43:23 AM)

Hi friends, India is developing country. We can see lot of diversities among the people region, climate and also in mentality too. Our peoples are mostly from villages, there literature rate is not affordable when comparing with city people and most of them are below poverty line, therefore their mentality will be " something is always better than nothing". So they won't care about the qualities they want to face the situation so they need some product. Usually they won't mention the product name in the shop but they mention the product at the rate, what they have (5 rupees bathing soap). Many of us had experienced this before.

Rate this:

+8

-3

Prateek said: (Wed, Mar 27, 2013 01:06:39 AM)

India is a very diverse country, life styles of people in India are very different, hence accordingly product range also vary very much. Some people want good quality product whereas some people give more value to product cost hence they sometimes compromise in quality. With over 1.25 billion population, we can not generalize that everyone compromises with quality but many people, due to various reasons (budget constraints etc. ) tend to compromise quality over price.
Rate this: +11 -0

Pajnka said: (Mon, Mar 25, 2013 11:16:44 PM)

When we talk about India, we must consider the people from different economic groups. If we consider a person below poverty line (30-40% Indian population) , who can't even afford proper food. How can we expect them to think about quality. But when it comes to middle class, they are definitely quality conscious. So as per my view, it depends upon standard of living of person (which in turn includes their economic class, education and awareness).
Rate this: +12 -0

Kunal said: (Mon, Mar 25, 2013 06:53:15 PM)

According to me we can't say that India is less quality conscious. It is dependent on two reasons. Either money or awareness. India is the country of villages, so in villages people are rich but they are not aware the latest product. The other reason is all India's populations 40 percentage are below poverty line. They don't have as much income to afford them.

Capital punishment for rapists Background Six drunken men were joyriding in a bus last Sunday when they picked up the physiotherapy student and her 28-year-old male companion. They took turns raping her before throwing the pair off the speeding vehicle. During her ordeal, the victim was attacked with an iron rod, causing serious intestinal injuries. Six men have since been arrested. A combination of abusive sexual behavior, a scant fear of the law and India's creaky judicial system encourage such attacks. The number of rape cases in New Delhi has risen by nearly one-fifth to 661 this year from a year ago, according to government figures, the highest among India's big cities. Favor of Strict laws: Fear of law: There is no fear of law left in criminals so there is need to make stricter laws in India which will again establish the respect for law in heart and mind of citizens. We need even more fearful laws then capital punishment so criminals think twice before such heinous crimes.

Only decent people have any reason to be afraid of the law any more. If there is, in fact, no protection for the lawabiding, then why should we pay taxes for something we do not get? All rich people and politicians long ago began to hire private security men who do the job the police once did, but only for them. Because there is no fear left in criminals for the law. How we can let live such criminals in our society unpunished? Imprisonment in India is not so tough punishment. Length of the imprisonment should be increased for all such crimes. Just keeping criminals on 2 years or so in jail doesn t change much in them. Most of them with political connections come out on bail or again join crime full time after coming out of jail. We need drastic change in our law and order system to establish fear of law can be established between criminals. Starting point of this can be capital punishment for these rapists. They deserve it government should do whatever required to give them such punishment. Against of Strict laws: In past 10 years we have executed only 2 people under capital punishment. Even we make such stringent law it wouldn t change much. Rather than death penalty, swift arrest and fast-tracked trial leading to conviction alone can instill fear of law in people and deter commission of crimes, be it against women or in general. Decision to give them capital punishment because it is not the right way to deal a crime with another crime. Capital punishment itself is a judicially assisted murder. Death penalty cannot be a deterrent unless swift and sure delivery of justice can be ensured." In 2011, no investigation was done in 36.6% of recorded instances of rape. Police should get active now and administrators should empower police to act against criminals. There are many cities in our country where politicians first helped criminals to grow. And later they have to empower police to curb those criminals. And police successfully curbed crimes in many cities with political support, so real question of political willingness to curb crimes. If you use criminals, to win elections then you will never wanted to wipe them out. Fast track special courts to deal with sexual crimes, improved justice delivery system and stringent sexual harassment laws. The conviction rate of rape cases has dropped from 46% in 1971 to 26% in 2012.So even death penalty is there no one can confidently say that conviction will really take place. Conclusion: Making only stricter laws would not establish the law and order in our country. But in such special cases government should take strict action against guilty and set an example for criminals. We cannot just let go every time by just depending on the existing system. We have to improve our system and empower administration to become a better society. Euthanasia: To Do Or Not To Do. Favour Euthanasia refers to practice of ending a life in a manner which relieves pain and suffering. According to House of Lords Select Committee on Medical Ethics, the precise definition of euthanasia is "a deliberate intervention undertaken with the express intention of ending a life, to relieve intractable suffering.

 For terminally ill patients and in cancer patients who are undergoing tremendous pain. It should be permitted, because pain is really unbearable. People who are terminally ill and who can't afford to pay high hospital charges, is it not better that euthanasia is done so as to save misery of the relatives who can't pay high medical bills. Terminally ill cancer patients undergo very severe pain. Pain through which a patient undergoes for living a few more days, when he'll be dying on his/her bed every moment. Isn't it better to free him from that prison of pain and sufferings if I think about this I feel, it should be allowed. Against It can be misused. There must be strict laws pertaining on whom it can be done. And the decision should not be given to only one individual he can misuse. There must be at least 2 other doctors who should also certify it, other than the treating doctor. People in favor of Euthanasia argue about state of a person who needs the liberation. But the fact is, if Euthanasia is legalized there would not be any check on circumstances under which a patient was killed/relieved. As we all know too well, how easy it is to buy professionals and their opinion. The intentions of legalizing Euthanasia may be good but legalizing it would be to legalize killings. History is witness that legalizing killing (remember the Soviet gulag, the Nazi concentration camps, the killing fields of Cambodia) has dreadful consequences. If euthanasia is legalized then suicide must also be. The only difference is the former is assisted and the later is self-inflicted. ON Dec 21, 2006.Marico Ricco an Italian doctor disconnected a respirator that was keeping Piergiorgio Welby alive. After Ricco gave him the sedative and switched off the respirator, Webly smilingly said goodbye to his wife and kids and in 45 min he was dead. Webly's right to die was widely publicized in Italy. Here two questions arise: whether a person has right to sustain life supporting medical treatment The other is whether voluntary euthanasia. is ethically defensible. But before such a law is implemented there must be strong legal framework on this; without any loopholes. Science is progressing at massive rate. At any point of time drug could come into the market which could save a person from a terminal illness. Every person desires to live, but in pain he loses power to understand and decide about his life and nobody has right to define someone else's destiny. So euthanasia should be definitely find a way out of our dictionaries. Conclusion It could be disastrous law for human race .What is required here, is to completely understand scenario and only after Euthanasia. Decision should be taken by a centralized committee consisting of doctors and law makers and committee should make decision based on circumstances.

Are film-makers harming folk culture? Favor Producer and director take a gamble trying to woo crowd by showing what they want. It s all commercial. It s not a charity, so while adding entertainment to original folk stories, sometimes they lost the gist of real story and basically distort the original history. Current trend in movies is towards folk culture, which may fade away soon. The producers are distorting history and giving a wrong picture of real life story to viewers for making money. What a cinema is showing may not be exact folk culture because movies are created for entertainment. For brining entertainment quotient in a movie most of the time makers forgot about the folk cultures and values. There was a movie released recently named after Abraham Lincoln. We all know Mr. Abraham Lincoln played a great role in history but this movie shows him as a vampire slayer. So film maker completely misrepresented history in this case. Against Film makers are promoting our values and traditions by movies. Youngsters are more interested in video games now so at least films teach them a bit about our folk history and values. If a movie is on folk culture then it should elucidate the beauty of the culture and there should not be any masala added to lure the audience.

 Folk culture is to be preserved in its natural and an inheritance should not be used to make money out of it by depicting the same in movies. Humans are any ways making museums to keep our history safe. Making few films would not harm our history. Conclusion It should ok if filmmakers are making folk movies but one thing they should keep in mind, that they must not present wrong facts in front of viewers.

For poorer sections of society, a state controlled economy is better than a liberalized economy Favour China is biggest example of success of state controlled economy. In liberal economies richer become richer and poorer are getting poorer. A state controlled economy will result in proper flow of benefits towards rural masses. State has control over the production and the markets helping poorer sections to avail benefits which they otherwise would have been deprived of. Against State controlled economies are big problem in path of growing business in country which will surely affect country's growth; eventually affects poor population. Russia is biggest example of failure of state controlled economy. The communist countries are bright example of state controlled economies do not result in uplifting poor. As history stands a proof that, state controlled economies have higher rates of corruption and mismanagement. A liberal economy with sound regulatory framework will ensure employment and a healthy economy. Conclusion State controlled economy has benefits but evidences from history tell us that state controlled economy is big failure.

Foreign direct investment (FDI) in retail sector. Background The recent cabinet decision on FDI in retail has triggered protests by opposition and key allies of the ruling United Progressive Alliance (UPA), who are demanding a roll back of the policy. The hour-long meeting held in Parliament House failed to resolve the logjam in the two Houses as opposition parties, led by BJP and the Left, stuck to their stand and demanded rollback of the Cabinet decision to allow 51 per cent FDI in multi-brand retail. Though at present only 53 cities with population not less than 10 lakh in the country have been identified for FDI As the fourth-largest economy in the world in PPP terms, India is a preferred destination for FDI. During 2000-10, the country attracted $178 billion as FDI. Favor This will bring modern technology to the country. Improve rural infrastructure. It would help build infrastructure and create a competitive market. Reduce wastage of agricultural produce. Enable our farmers to get better prices for their crops. Consumers will get commodities of daily use at reduced prices. Biggest beneficiary of this would be small farmers, who would be able to improve productivity and realize higher remuneration by selling directly to large organized players and shorten the chain from farm to consumers. Government too stands to gain by this move through more transparent and accountable monitoring of goods and supply chain management systems. It can expect to receive an additional US$ 25-30 billion by way of taxes Opening of retail can be seen as a solution for food inflation, which has been confounding policy-makers. FDI in retail would help in building much needed back end infrastructure. Additionally, he said, investments in cold storage chain infrastructure would reduce loss of agricultural produce and provide more options to farmers.

Against Our interest rates today are as high as 14 per cent to 16 per cent how do we compete with the economies which have a 4 per cent interest rate. Our infrastructure our trade facilitations our labor laws, all these factors collectively don't make India low cost. So do you want India to become a center where we allow foreign companies to come in and set up these large chains which eventually instead of selling domestic products out sourcing internationally the cheapest sources and selling those products. Please remember domestic retail normally sources domestically, international retail sources internationally because they source from the cheapest sources. Even if big retail companies help the farmers in resurrecting their economy, what plan does the government has for millions of middlemen who are part of the business process chain that ensures manufactured products reach end users. We engage millions of uneducated and semi-educated people at various stages of retail business spread across towns and cities but we are afraid that Tesco and Wal-Mart will only engage smart and educated workforce in small strength, comparatively. Conclusion Government is taking this decision in good faith. Few persons and lobbies controlling the rates of food commodities in India. And bringing more competition in market will bring better prices for buyers as well as sellers of commodities. Parties protesting against FDIs in retail have choice to not allow FDIs in the states they are ruling. Government should make a regulatory body for the commodity trade as we have for cellular services.

Lokpal Bill Background The Jan Lokpal Bill also referred as citizen's ombudsman bill. The Jan Lokpal Bill aims to effectively deter corruption, readdress grievances of citizens, and protect whistleblowers. If made into law, the bill would create an independent ombudsman body called Lokpal (Sanskrit: protector of the people).It would be empowered to register and investigate complaints of corruption against politicians and bureaucrats without prior government approval. In April 2011, civil activist Anna Hazare started a Satyagraha movement by commencing an indefinite fast in New Delhi to demand the passing of bill. Movement attracted attention of media, and hundreds of thousands of supporters, in part due to the organizational skills of Arvind Kejriwal. Following Hazare's four day hunger strike, Indian Prime Minister Manmohan Singh stated that the bill would be re-introduced in 2011 monsoon session of the Parliament. Features of proposed bill To establish a central government anti-corruption institution called Lokpal, supported by Lokayukta at the state level. As in the case of the Supreme Court and Cabinet Secretariat, Lokpal will be supervised by the Cabinet Secretary and the Election Commission. As a result, it will be completely independent of the government and free from ministerial influence in its investigations. Members will be appointed by judges, Indian Administrative Service officers with a clean record, private citizens and constitutional authorities through a transparent and participator process. A selection committee will invite short-listed candidates for interviews, video recordings of which will thereafter be made public. Every month on its website, the Lokayukta will publish a list of cases dealt with , brief details of each, their outcome and any action taken or proposed. It will also publish lists of all cases received by the Lokayukta during the previous month, cases dealt with and those which are pending. Investigations of each case must be completed in one year. Any resulting trials should be concluded in the following year, giving a total maximum process time of two years. Losses to the government by a corrupt individual will be recovered at the time of conviction. Government office work required by a citizen that is not completed within a prescribed time period will result in Lokpal imposing financial penalties on those responsible, which will then be given as compensation to the complainant. Complaints against any officer of Lokpal will be investigated and completed within month and, if found to be substantive, will result in the officer being dismissed within two months.

 The existing anti-corruption agencies [CVC], departmental vigilance and the anti-corruption branch of the [CBI] will be merged into Lokpal which will have complete power authority to independently investigate and prosecute any officer, judge or politician. Whistleblowers who alert the agency to potential corruption cases will also be provided with protection by it.

Sachin Tendulkar should not retire! Background Sachin Tendulkar is an Indian cricketer widely considered by many to be one of the greatest batsmen of all time. He is the leading run-scorer and century maker in Test and one-day international cricket. Wisden ranked him the second greatest Test batsman of all time, behind Donald Bradman. And the second greatest one-day-international (ODI) batsman of all time, behind Viv Richards. Tendulkar is the only cricketer to accomplish the feat of scoring a hundred centuries in international cricket which includes 49 ODI and 51 Test centuries. On 17 October 2008, when he surpassed Brian Lara's record for the most runs scored in Test cricket. Favor Sachin is the greatest player in the world and he has every right to decide when he should retire. Sachin given so much hope and charm to Indian cricket that no one can push him for anything. Sachin is completely fit right now and his performance is better than most of the youngsters in team Sachin is exceptional player and he has full right of deciding when he can say good bye to the game Sachin proved himself in all aspects of game as well as life. He is true gentleman and we can trust his decision more than any other selector of Indian team so we should let him take this decision. Against There are lot of youngsters waiting for their chance; so it s right time to give them chance. Sachin performed for himself and many times Sachin performed but we lost game. Every profession having retiring age and I think for cricket we need more young blood which can do better for future of Indian cricket. Conclusion Its true there is need of young blood but we can t achieve that by kicking out our senior players which are fit and performing well. If youngsters can prove themselves then they will definitely get chance over senior players. Sachin is fit and in better form then other members of team. We should wait for his own decision for retirement. Everyone wants to see him play more and more for India.

Formation of European Union has a drastic effect on India's trade. Favour This may be read in light of trading equations with our biggest partners USA, UK and Germany, where we had miserably failed to bargain given that most of our trade consumables have import exposures from these nations; the European Union will further augment this situation. EU-India trade talks began well in June 2007. India s rapidly expanding role in the world economy as a buyer and seller make this an important free trade agreement for the EU, as recent research shows. Against The EU-India negotiations began well in June 2007. But the hard issues are always left to last in such discussions. The benefits of an agreement for the two nations are especially hard to quantify given importance that each places on hard-to-measure gains in areas like investment and services. The EU would mean more exposure to a more stable currency vis--vis the presently volatile dollar tranche; this would mean healthier earnings and repatriation. Conclusion India s rapidly expanding role in the world economy as a buyer and seller make this an important target for the EU. It would be an agreement well worth having. Of course, such bilateral progress should come in addition to, rather than in place of progress in the WTO s current multilateral talks (the Doha Round) but such progress depends

only partly on the EU s stance. From the Indian side, the free trade agreement would be a move from its reliance on a unilateral liberalization policy with extreme reluctance to commit multilaterally.

Under Indian parliamentary democracy, it is impossible to ensure balanced regional development. (IIMC) Favour Governments tend to be biased towards vote banks while making and implementing policies. The minorities are usually left out in power game and agitation by various minorities is an example of the lopsided development. Most of politicians and policy makers in our country stay in metros or frequently visit metros so; they themselves take such decisions which promote development of only metros; whereas rest of India being untouched with growth. Politicians in power, only take interest in development of their home town or home state; which further increase gap of development between different states. Against Fundamental principles of democracy preach to ensure balanced regional development. Uniform representation in the Lower House by MPs from all over the country is to bring out regional problems and demands of people across country. Constitution is completely unbiased for any kind of regional growth. Conclusion Democracy and constitution don t support any kind of regional bias but politician themselves are biased.