Professional Documents
Culture Documents
A STUDY ON Financial Analysis of Bajaj Auto (Conducted on behalf of Som lalit Institute of management) (Submission on) A Project Report submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements For the award of the PGP-1[B] (Financial Management) To Som lalit Institute of Management Submitted by: Mr. Akshay H. Khatri Mr. Bhavin Donda Mr. Darshan Patel Mr. Gopal Rakholiya Mr. Jaydeep Roziya Mr. Vijay Aslaliya Under the guidance of Prof. Arpita Amarnani Submitted to: Prof. Arpita Amarnani (January 2013)
Group No. 6
Page 1
Financial Analysis of Bajaj Auto 2013 Acknowledgement We are glad to present the financial report for you. We are obliging to college to provide us this opportunity for practical study. We are thankful to Prof. Arpita Amarnani under whose guidance we are able to prepare this financial report and do analysis for the same. At last but not a least, we are thankful to the liberalization of our college for providing us a book which is very useful to us for preparing this report.
Group No. 6
Page 2
Company Perspectives: Our Philosophy: We approach our responsibilities with ambition and resourcefulness. We organise ourselves for a transparent and harmonious flow of work. We respect sound theory and encourage creative experimentation. And we make our workplace a source of pride. We believe in: Transparency--a commitment that the business is managed along transparent lines. Fairness&mdash all stakeholders in the Company, but especially to minority shareholders. Disclosure--of all relevant financial and non-financial information in an easily understood manner. Supervision--of the Company's activities by a professionally competent and independent board of directors. Key Dates: Key Dates: 1945: Bajaj Auto is founded. 1960: Rahul Bajaj becomes the Indian licensee for Vespa scooters. 1977: Technical collaboration with Piaggio ends. 1984: Work begins on a second plant. 1998: Bajaj plans to build its third plant to meet demand.
Group No. 6
Page 3
New Competition in the 1980s Japanese and Italian scooter companies began entering the Indian market in the early 1980s. Although some boasted superior technology and flashier brands, Bajaj Auto had built up several advantages in the previous decades. Its customers liked the durability of the product and the ready availability of maintenance; the company's distributors permeated the country. The Bajaj M-50 debuted in 1981. The new fuel-efficient, 50cc motorcycle was immediately successful, and the company aimed to be able to make 60,000 of them a year by 1985. Capacity was the most important constraint for the Indian motorcycle industry. Although the country's total production rose from 262,000 vehicles in 1976 to 600,000 in 1982, companies like rival Lohia Machines had difficulty meeting demand. Bajaj Auto's advance orders for one of its new mini-motorcycles amounted to $57 million. Work on a new plant at Waluj, Aurangabad commenced in January 1984. The 1986-87 fiscal year saw the introduction of the Bajaj M-80 and the Kawasaki Bajaj KB100 motorcycles. The company was making 500,000 vehicles a year at this point. Although Rahul Bajaj credited much of his company's success with its focus on one type of product, he did attempt to diversify into tractor-trailers. In 1987 his attempt to buy control of Ahsok Leyland failed. The Bajaj Sunny was launched in 1990; the Kawasaki Bajaj 4S Champion followed a year later. About this time, the Indian government was initiating a program of market liberalization, doing away with the old 'license raj' system, which limited the amount of investment any one company could make in a particular industry. A possible joint venture with Piaggio was discussed in 1993 but aborted. Rahul Bajaj told the Financial Times that his company was too large to be considered a potential collaborator by Japanese firms. It was hoping to increase its exports, which then amounted to just five percent of sales. The company began by shipping a few thousand vehicles a year to neighboring Sri Lanka and Bangladesh, but soon was reaching markets in Europe, Latin America, Africa, and West Asia. Its domestic market share, barely less than 50 percent, was slowly slipping. By 1994, Bajaj also was contemplating high-volume, low-cost car manufacture. Several of Bajaj's rivals were looking at this market as well, which was being rapidly liberalized by the Indian government. Bajaj Auto produced one million vehicles in the 1994-95 fiscal year. The company was the world's fourth largest manufacturer of two-wheelers, behind Japan's Honda, Suzuki, and Kawasaki. New models included the Bajaj Classic and the Bajaj Super Excel. Bajaj also signed development agreements with two Japanese engineering firms, Kubota and Tokyo R & D. Bajaj's
Group No. 6
Page 5
Group No. 6
Page 7
Meaning:
This ratio measures the relationship between Gross Profit and Net Sales.
Objective:
The objective of computing this ratio is to measure the ability of the firm to meet its short-term obligations and to reflect the short-term financial strength\solvency of a firm. It suggests whether firm can meet its short term obligation from short-term assets.
Formula:
G.P. %
24.12
2012-11
2011-10
2010-09
2009-08
2008-07
2007-06
Years
Group No. 6
Page 8
Meaning:
This ratio measures the relationship between Net profit and net sale.
Objective:
The main objective of computing this ratio is to determine the overall profitability, due to various factors such as operational efficiency, trading on equity etc.
Formula:
(Rs. cr) 2011-10 201020092008200709 08 07 06 3339.73 1703.63 654.5 755.78 1237.1 15998.1 11508.5 8436.94 8663.29 9292.23 20.87 14.80 7.75 8.72 13.31
13.31
Group No. 6
Page 9
Meaning:
It is a ratio that shows relationship between Expenses and Sales. Expenses include different expenses like Administrative, Financial, Selling and Distribution.
Objective:
To identify the causes on the variation in the operating ratio, the following ratio can be calculated.
Formula:
Particular Total expense Net sales Expense ratio%
Expenses Sales
2012-11 15976.85 18880.27 84.62
x 100
2011-10
201009
200908
200807
13365.2 9486.52 7769.07 7931.75 8299.04 15988.12 83.59 11508.5 8436.94 8663.29 9292.23 82.43 92.08 91.55 89.31
Interpretation:
From sales company spends almost 85% in expenses. But still company manages to reduce its expenses from last several years. The average expenses are 88% from sales. So, the reduction in expense ratio is good for company.
Group No. 6
Page 10
Meaning:
This ratio measures the relationship between the operating cost and net sales.
Objective:
The main objective of computing this ratio is to determine the operational efficiency with which production or purchased or selling operation of the management.
Formula:
Particular 2012-11 COGS Operating expense Net sales Operating ratio 14326.97 1215.77 18880.27 82.32
Group No. 6
Page 11
Operating Ratio
92.00 90.00 88.00 86.00 84.00 82.00 80.00 78.00 76.00 74.00 90.47 OPERATING RATIO % 89.80 87.55
82.32 80.77
81.19
2012-11
2011-10
2010-09
2009-08
2008-07
2007-06
YEARS
Interpretation:
Higher the operating ratio, lower the financial condition and vice-a-versa. Because operating ratio shows overall expenses including cost of goods sold. So, lower ratio is better. And company is able to reduce its operating profit from six years.
Meaning:
This ratio measures a relationship between net profit before interest and tax and capital employed.
Objective:
The objective of calculating this ratio is to find out the efficiency of the management to invest long term funds, supplied by the creditors and shareholders.
Formula:
Return Of Capital Employed Ratio = Net Profit (EBIT) x 100 Capital Employed
(Rs. cr) 2007-06 1733.39 7159.75
Page 12
R.O.I.%
2012-11
2011-10
2010-09
2009-08
2008-07
2007-06
YEARS
Interpretation:
Of course, higher rate on investment is good for company. And comparing to 2006-2010, company has increased its return on investment for last 2 years. So, companys financial condition is better than last several years.
Meaning:
This ratio measures a relationship between net profit after interest, tax and shareholders funds.
Objectives:
The objective of computing this ratio is to find out how efficiently the funds supplied by the equity shareholder have been used.
Formula:
Return on Shareholders = Net Profit After Tax x 100 Shareholders fund
Particular 2012-11 2011-10 2010-09 2009-08 (Rs. cr) 2008-07 2007-06
Group No. 6
Page 13
201.10
147.02
171.89
285.67
210.06
447.36
R.O.S.F.%
2012-11
2011-10
2010-09
2009-08
2008-07
2007-06
YEARS
Return on shareholders fund is almost double than share holders fund. And especially from last 6 years company has earned profit between 150 to 200% on shareholders fund. So company has better value in market
Interpretation:
Meaning:
This ratio measures a relationship between net profit after interest, tax and pref. dividend and equity share capital.
Objectives:
The objective of computing this ratio is to find out how efficiently the capital is supplied by the equity shareholder has been used. Formula: Return on equity share capital = Profit (PAT) Preference Dividend x 100
Group No. 6 Page 14
Interpretation:
The return on investment is the subject to worry as it is declining, but still it is above 100% for last year. The highest is 122.26% in the year 2006-07. But after it, in next two years, it was declining in nature. The lowest was 45.24% in the year 2008-09. But the condition is good of return on equity share capital.
Meaning:
This ratio measures the earnings available to an equity shareholder on the basis of per share.
Objective:
The objective of computing this ratio is to measure the profitability of the firm on the basis of per equity share.
Group No. 6 Page 15
Particular Net profit (After tax) Numberof equity shares Earnings per share in Rs.
Interpretation:
The earnings per share are the subject to worry as it is declining, but still it is above 100% for last year. The highest is 122.26% in the year 2006-07. But after it, in next two years, it was declining in nature. The lowest was 45.24% in the year 2008-09. But the condition is good of return on equity share capital.
Meaning:
This ratio measures relationship between dividend per share and number of equity shares.
Group No. 6 Page 16
2012-11 1302.15
2011-10 1157.47
2010-09 578.73
2009-08 318.3
289367020 45.00
144683510 22.00
144683510 20.00
101183510 40.00
D.P.S.(In Rs.)
22.000
20.000
2012-11
2011-10
2010-09
2009-08
2008-07
2007-06
YEARS
Interpretation:
The dividend per share is highest in last year i.e. in 2011-12. It is 45. Even in the recession year 2008-09 Bajaj auto is able to declare 20rs.Dividend. And after it, it is increasing since last year. In 2010 and 2011 it has declared the same dividend 22.
2 Activity/Turnover ratios
2.1 Overall turnover ratio
Group No. 6 Page 17
Objective:
This ratio measures the effectiveness with which the firm uses financial resources as its disposal. A Company must take full use of fixed assets as its disposal. A low ratio may signify that the capital is lying idle. A high ratio indicates that either the firm overtaking to an extent that its financial state is in danger.
Formula:
Net Sales Capital Employed (Rs. cr) 2008-07 2007-06 8663.29 9292.23 2921.93 2.96 7159.75 1.30
Interpretation:
Group No. 6 Page 18
Meaning:
This ratio measures a relationship between net sales and fixed assets of the firm.
Objective:
The objective of calculating this ratio is to point out the efficiency of the firm in the use of fixed assets.
Formula:
(Rs. cr) 2008-07 2007-06 8663.29 9292.23 1292.82 1296.39 6.70 7.17
Group No. 6
Page 19
Meaning:
This period shows an average period for which credit sales remain outstanding and measures the quality of debtors. It indicates the rapidity or slowness with which the money is collected from debtors.
Objectives:
The Objective of calculating this ratio shows the number of days taken to collect the dues of credit sales. It shows the efficiency or otherwise of collection policy of an enterprise.
Formula:
Debtor ratio
25.00 20.00 Debtor ratio 15.00 10.00 8.06 5.00 0.00 2012-11 2011-10 2010-09 2009-08 2008-07 2007-06 years 15.30 11.44 8.16 7.49 20.53
Group No. 6
Page 20
Meaning:
It is relationship between the annual days and the Debtors ratio.
Objectives:
The main purpose of prepare this ratio is to determine the number of times the amount of credit sales is collected during the year.
31.47
Interpretation:
Group No. 6 Page 21
Meaning:
The ratio is computed by dividing creditors and bills payable by the average daily purchases. The average daily purchases are obtained by dividing the total annual sales by 360.
Objectives:
The Objective of calculating this ratio shows the number of days make payment the dues of credit purchases. It shows the efficiency or otherwise of payment policy of an enterprise.
Formula:
Creditors ratio =
Particular 2012-11 Creditors 2003.08 Purchases 14196.69 No.of 360 days Creditors 50.79 ratio days
Creditors Ratio
80.00 Creditors ratio(no.of times) 70.00 60.00 50.00 40.00 30.00 20.00 10.00 0.00 2012-11 2011-10 2010-09 2009-08 2008-07 7.18 2007-06 50.79 58.88 44.71 47.32 69.66
Group No. 6
Years
Page 22
Meaning:
This ratio establishes a relationship between net credit purchases and avg. trade creditors.
Objective:
The objective of computing this ratio is to determine the efficiency with which the creditors are arranged.
Group No. 6
Page 23
Interpretation:
Lesser the rate betters the situation. In the last year it is 7.09 it shows that in last year company has paid only for 7 times to its receivers so it would have required lesser working capital. The ratio is worst in the year 2006-07.
Meaning:
This ratio establishes a relationship between costs of goods sold & average stock.
Objectives:
The objective of computing this ratio is to determine the efficiency with which the inventory is utilized.
Formula:
Particular Cost of sales (COGS) Average stock Stock turn ratio
Stock Turnover Ratio = Cost of goods Sold Average Stock 2012-11 14326.97 2011-10 2010-09 2009-08 6584.83 2008-07 6764.24 (Rs. cr) 2007-06 7057.55
11970.4
8207.98
Group No. 6
Page 24
2012-11
2011-10
2010-09
2009-08
2008-07
2007-06
years
Interpretation:
The stock turnover ratio is 36.65 in the last year. It means that average stock is 36.65 times than cost of goods sold. It shows good position of the company. The lowest is in the year 2008-09 and the highest in the year 2006-07.
Meaning:
This ratio establishes relationship between net sales and net working capital. This ratio shows that from the working capital how many times it is turned into sales. Higher the ratio, the working capital of the company is good.
Formula:
Particular Net sales Net working capital Working capital turnover
Group No. 6
Working capital turnover = Sales Net working capital 2012-11 18880.27 2,528.03 7.47 2011-10 15988.12 445.94 35.85 2010-09 11508.5 974.70 11.81 2009-08 8436.94 1,111.86 7.59 (Rs. cr) 2008-07 8663.29 606.46 14.29 2007-06 9292.23 2,319.66 4.01
Page 25
Interpretation:
Working capital turnover ratio is highest in the year 2010-11 and lowest is in the year 2006-07. In the year 2011-12 the working capital is 7.47 times than sales.
Meaning:
This measures relationship between proprietors fund & number of equity shares.
Formula:
Particular Proprietors fund Number of shares Book value per share
Book value per share : Proprietors fund No. of shares 2012-11 6041.07 2011-10 4910.22 2010-09 2928.34 2009-08 1869.69 144683510 (Rs. cr) 2008-07 2007-06 1587.59 5534.32 144683510 101183510
289,367,020
289,367,020 144683510
208.77
169.69
202.40
129.23
109.73
546.96
Group No. 6
Page 26
Interpretation:
Book value per share depends on no. of shares and proprieties funds. So according to no. of shares the condition is ideal in the year 2010-11. And t he worst in the year 2006-07.
Meaning:
This ratio establishes the relationship between current assets and current liabilities.
Objective:
The objective of computing this ratio is to measure the ability of the firm to meet its short-term obligation.
Formula:
Interpretation:
Current ratio 2:1 is the ideal condition. At initial stage company had to kept higher rate of current asset but after certain years the rate is near to 2. And in last year it is good because its 1.76 and just near to 2. So company has a better condition.
Meaning:
This ratio establishes the relationship between liquid assets and liquid liabilities.
Objectives:
The objective of computing this ratio is to measure the ability of the firm to meet its short-term obligation as and when due without relying upon the realization of stock
Formula:
Particular Liquid assets
Liquid Ratio = Liquid Assets Liquid Liability 2011-10 2325.31 2010-09 1137.62 2009-08 1986.43 2008-07 1300.1 (Rs. cr) 2007-06 3508.93
2012-11 4511.82
Group No. 6
Page 28
Quick Ratio
2.50 liquid ratio(no of times) 2.00 1.76 1.50 1.00 0.50 0.00 2012-11 2011-10 2010-09 2009-08 2008-07 2007-06 Years 0.96 0.56 1.64 1.25 2.34
Interpretation:
1:1 is the best quick ratio. So, in the year 2010-11 it is the best because it is just near to 1. And the lowest is 0.56 in the year 2009-10. In the initial years, the ratio has reached to 2.34 which the highest one. But overall the situation is acceptable.
Meaning:
This ratio measures the proportion of owners fund as compare to total funds.
Objective:
The objective of computing this ratio is to measure the relative proportion of equity and pref. sh. capital and reserves & surplus (inclusive of balance of profit and losses account) to total funds.
x 100
2012-11
2011-10
2010-09
2009-08
Proprietary Ratio
100.00 90.00 80.00 70.00 60.00 50.00 40.00 30.00 20.00 10.00 0.00 proprietary ratio(no of times) 93.57 93.26 76.51 68.60 54.29 54.13
2012-11
2011-10
2010-09
2009-08
2008-07
2007-06
Years
Interpretation: In the year 2011-12 proprietarys fund is almost 94% to the net assets so the financial condition of a firm is good if we see the proprietary ratio. In the recession year the ratio was reached at the bottom 54.13 in the year 2007-08.
Meaning:
This ratio establishes a relationship between long-term debts and shareholders funds.
Objective:
The objective of computing this ratio is to measure the relative proportion of debt and equity in financing the assets of the firm.
x 100
(Rs. cr)
Group No. 6 Page 30
4.21 2012-11
Years
Interpretation:
Lower the ratio betters the situation. And the best year for company is 2011-12. Company has enough shareholders fund to overcome their long term liabilities. In the year 2007-08 the condition was bad as long term liabilities are 84.05%. Equity is higher than Debt of the company in other years.
Meaning:
This ratio establishes a relationship between long-term funds to fixed assets.
Objectives:
The objective of computing this ratio is to measure the relation between long-term funds and fixed assets. With the help of this ratio one can move
Group No. 6 Page 31
Formula:
Long term fund to fixed assets ratio = Long Term Fund x 100 Fixed Assets
(Rs. cr) 2008-07 2007-06 1334.34 1625.43 1292.82 103.21 times 1296.39 125.38 times
Particular Long term fund Fixed assets Long term fund to fixed assets ratio
Interpretation: The highest ratio is 125.38 in the year 2006-07 and the lowest is in the year 2010-11 i.e. 12.32 times. At initial year the ratio of long term fund to fixed assets is very high but after that the ratio is decreasing which is good for the company.
Objective:
The objective of this ratio is to know the debt service capacity of the firm in respect of fixed interest on long term debts.
Formula: Interest coverage ratio = Profit before depreciation, interest & tax
Interest paid
Particular Profit before depreciation, interest & tax Interest paid Interest coverage ratio 2012-11 4194.03 2011-10 4475.28 2010-09 2553.56 2009-08 1108.89 (Rs. cr) 2008-07 2007-06 1313.85 1108.89
22.24 188.58
1.69 2648.09
5.98 427.01
21.01 52.77
5.16 254.62
5.34 207.65
Years
Interpretation:
Higher the ratio betters the situation. And the highest is in the year 2010-11. The profit has reached to 2648.09 times than interest. In the recession year profit has reached to the bottom i.e. 52.78 times to the Interest paid In the last year it is 188.58 which is quite good.
Re= Rf + (Rm-Rf) = Re= 12.5 +0.702186(0.000557-0.125) =Re= 12.41% WACC: For the year 2006-07: Source Equity Reserves and surplus Debt Proportion Cost of capital Weighted Avg. 0.01821 12.41 0.2259861 0.99 12.41 12.2859 0.004 8.9 0.0356 12.5474861
Group No. 6
Page 34
Group No. 6
Page 35