Professional Documents
Culture Documents
2005
2005
FSAI/DoHC
(Food)
Policy & Implementation
Implementation
Policy
GM Analysis
(State Lab & Cork PAL)
DAFF
(Feed and Seed)
EPA/DEHLG
(Live GMOs)
2005
GMOs
Edible packaging
Functional Food
Nanotechnology
2005
GMOs/GM Products
Pharmaceuticals
2005
2005
GM Animals
Enviropigs Express phytase in their saliva and excrete up to 75% less Phosphorous
2005
75 out of 333 (~23%) food samples tested (mainly maize soya & rice) between 2000 and 2006 contained low levels of GM ingredients No unauthorised GM ingredients (except the illegal GM rice) were identified and none were above the 0.9% labelling threshold GM free/Non GM labels were frequently found to be misleading
(Any level of GM ingredient present in a food carrying such labelling is misleading to consumers and in breach of the General Labelling Directive 2000/13/EC)
2005
GMO/GM Food Issues 30 (0.4%) enquiries (17 telephone, 11 emails & 2 personal)
2005
2005
2005
(12) Maize (25) (5) Cotton seed (7) (3) Oilseed Rape (1) (1) Soya (3) (1) Bacterial product (2) (1) Yeast product Rice (1) (1) Sugar beet Amylopectin potato (1)
24 = Total = 40
2005
Cry gene
2005
3-Phosphoshikimate Phospoenoylpyruvate
Pi
+
3-Phospho-5-enoylpyruvylshikimate
Cotton
2005
No selection
Selection
2005
CryIA gene
Lac I
35S
pZP211/anti-HSP21 10364 bp
NPT2 35S PA TL
Promoter elements
Terminator elements
2005
No Treatment Seed
Treatment Seed
2005
EU GM Food Regulations
Novel Food Regulation (EC) No. 258/97 Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 Authorisation & Labelling of GM Food and Feed Regulation (EC) No 1830/2003 Traceability and Labelling of GMOs and derived food and feed Directive 2001/18/EC Authorisation of GMOs for cultivation/contained use Regulation (EC) No 1946/2003 Transboundary movements of genetically modified organisms
2005
Authorisation
Safety assessment carried out by EFSA Authorisation for a period of 10 years, renewable Emergency withdrawals permitted for valid health or environmental reasons
Labelling
1. 2. 3. 4. Labelling required where > 0.9% of a food or ingredient is GM Labelling not dependent on the presence of GM DNA or protein No EU requirement for mass caterers to label GM ingredients GM labelling not required for cheese made with GM chymosin, or fermentation products where the GMM is not present in the final product (riboflavin)
2005
GM Food/Feed Authorisation
Draft Decision
DG SANCO
6 months
3 months
EFSA
14 days
Decision
Council of Ministers
3 months
Competent Authority
Applicant
DG SANCO
2005
No Decision
No Decision
Safety Opinion
Country
Population
Votes
Country
Population
Votes
Germany
82m
16.7%
29
Austria
8.3m
1.7%
10
France
63m
12.8%
29
Bulgaria
7.7m
1.6%
10
UK
60m
12.3%
29
Denmark
5.4m
1.1%
Italy
59m
11.9%
29
Slovakia
5.4m
1.1%
From 1 November 2004, a qualified majority will be reached if the following two conditions are met: a majority of member states approve (in some cases two-thirds); a minimum of 255 votes is cast in favour of the proposal, (73.9 %). In addition, a member state may ask for confirmation that the votes in favour represent at least 62% of the total population of the Union. If this is found not to be the case, the decision will not be adopted.
Spain
44m
8.9%
27
Finland
5.3m
1.1%
Poland
38m
7.7%
27
Ireland
4.2m
0.9%
Romania
22m
4.4%
14
Lithuania
3.4m
0.7%
Netherlands
16m
3.3%
13
Latvia
2.3m
0.5%
Greece
11m
2.3%
12
Slovenia
2.0m
0.4%
Portugal
11m
2.1%
12
Estonia
1.3m
0.3%
Belgium
11m
2.1%
12
Cyprus
0.77m
0.2%
Czech Rep.
10m
2.1%
12
Luxembourg
0.46m
0.1%
Hungary
10m
2.0%
12
Malta
0.40m
0.1%
Sweden
9.0m
1.8%
10
EU
493m
100%
345
2005
FOR 15 Member States (197 votes 57%) AGAINST 7 Member States (52 votes 15%) ABSTAINED 4 Member States (69 votes 20%) Absent 1 Member State absent (27 votes 8%)
2005
Evolving Concerns
Health & environmental concerns Allergenicity Antibiotic resistance marker genes Coexistence Biological v statistical significance Transparency of the process Fate of input from Member States Food from animals fed GM feed
2005
2005