Job: Sharon Hills

Sheet No. 1 of 1
Calc by: SCS Date 10/23/2008
Check by: Date

Downstream Defender Sizing Calculations: DD-P1

For sizing "Flow-Through" treatment devices as the Downstream Defender, the Massachusetts Department of
Environmental Protection has developed a relation between storm intensity and the depth of runoff (See
"Development of a Rational Basis for Designing Recharging Stormwater Control Structures adn Flow And Volume
Design Criteria" MADEP 99-06/319). This allows the sizing of the treatment unit based on a flow rate instead of a
volume. (See Table x from the report, below)

Based on the first 1.0 inches of rainfall on the mainland (off Cape-Massachusetts) with a 95% probability, use max.
storm intensity of 1.67 in/hr (Table 4).

Total Runoff Required to Be Treated

Total Impervious area: 3.24 (P43)

Total Roof Area: 0.06
Total Runoff to Be Treated: 3.18

Downstream Defender Sizing

Flow = 1.67 x 3.18 x 453 gpm/ac-in/hr = 2,406 gpm

5.36 cfs
Q100 Year= 65.92 cfs x 448.8 gal-s/cf-min = 29,585 gpm

Use 6 ft. diameter Downstream Defender Unit with bypass

Flowrate at 60% Removal Efficiency= 8 cfs (see chart)

LOCATION Q Size So n d Ø A WP Rh Q
FROM TO (Actual)
(ft³/s) (ft) ft/ft) (-) (ft) (deg) (ft²) (ft) (ft) (ft³/s)
DMH1-9 DMH1-10 5.36 2.00 0.040 0.013 0.4650 115.31 0.554 2.01 0.28 5.36

Invert in Weir Manhole= 311.60

Elevation Weir= 312.07
 Job: Sharon Hills
Sheet No. 1 of 1
Calc by: SCS Date 10/23/2008
Check by: Date

Downstream Defender Sizing Calculations: DD-P5-1

For sizing "Flow-Through" treatment devices as the Downstream Defender, the Massachusetts Department of
Environmental Protection has developed a relation between storm intensity and the depth of runoff (See
"Development of a Rational Basis for Designing Recharging Stormwater Control Structures adn Flow And Volume
Design Criteria" MADEP 99-06/319). This allows the sizing of the treatment unit based on a flow rate instead of a
volume. (See Table x from the report, below)

Based on the first 1.0 inches of rainfall on the mainland (off Cape-Massachusetts) with a 95% probability, use max.
storm intensity of 1.67 in/hr (Table 4).

Total Runoff Required to Be Treated

Total Impervious area: 4.53 (P18, P23)

Total Roof Area: 0.22
Total Runoff to Be Treated: 4.31

Downstream Defender Sizing

Flow = 1.14 x 4.31 x 453 gpm/ac-in/hr = 2,226 gpm
4.96 cfs
Q100 Year= 56.25 cfs x 448.8 gal-s/cf-min = 25,245 gpm

Use 6 ft. diameter Downstream Defender Unit with bypass

Flowrate at 60% Removal Efficiency= 8 cfs (see chart)

LOCATION Q Size So n d Ø A WP Rh Q
FROM TO (Actual)
(ft³/s) (ft) ft/ft) (-) (ft) (deg) (ft²) (ft) (ft) (ft³/s)
DMH4-4 DMH4-5 4.96 2.50 0.007 0.013 0.6420 121.79 0.997 2.66 0.38 4.96

Invert in Weir Manhole= 298.45

Elevation Weir= 299.09
 Job: Sharon Hills
Sheet No. 1 of 1
Calc by: SCS Date 10/23/2008
Check by: Date

Downstream Defender Sizing Calculations: DD-P5-2

For sizing "Flow-Through" treatment devices as the Downstream Defender, the Massachusetts Department of
Environmental Protection has developed a relation between storm intensity and the depth of runoff (See
"Development of a Rational Basis for Designing Recharging Stormwater Control Structures adn Flow And Volume
Design Criteria" MADEP 99-06/319). This allows the sizing of the treatment unit based on a flow rate instead of a
volume. (See Table x from the report, below)

Based on the first 0.50 inches of rainfall on the mainland (off Cape-Massachusetts) with a 95% probability, use max.
storm intensity of 1.14 in/hr (Table 2).

Total Runoff Required to Be Treated

Total Impervious area: 0.34 (P19)

Total Roof Area: 0
Total Runoff to Be Treated: 0.34

Downstream Defender Sizing

Flow = 1.14 x 0.34 x 453 gpm/ac-in/hr = 176 gpm
0.39 cfs
Q100 Year= 11.45 cfs x 448.8 gal-s/cf-min = 5,139 gpm

Use 4 ft. diameter Downstream Defender Unit with bypass

Flowrate at 60% Removal Efficiency= 2.6 cfs (see chart)

LOCATION Q Size So n d Ø A WP Rh Q
FROM TO (Actual)
(ft³/s) (ft) ft/ft) (-) (ft) (deg) (ft²) (ft) (ft) (ft³/s)
DMH5-2 DMH5-3 0.39 1.50 0.006 0.013 0.2240 90.93 0.165 1.19 0.14 0.39

Invert in Weir Manhole= 287.75

Elevation Weir= 287.97
 Job: Sharon Hills
Sheet No. 1 of 1
Calc by: SCS Date 10/23/2008
Check by: Date

Downstream Defender Sizing Calculations: DD-P6

For sizing "Flow-Through" treatment devices as the Downstream Defender, the Massachusetts Department of
Environmental Protection has developed a relation between storm intensity and the depth of runoff (See
"Development of a Rational Basis for Designing Recharging Stormwater Control Structures adn Flow And Volume
Design Criteria" MADEP 99-06/319). This allows the sizing of the treatment unit based on a flow rate instead of a
volume. (See Table x from the report, below)

Based on the first 0.50 inches of rainfall on the mainland (off Cape-Massachusetts) with a 95% probability, use max.
storm intensity of 1.14 in/hr (Table 2).

Total Runoff Required to Be Treated

Total Impervious area: 0.27 (P20)

Total Roof Area: 0
Total Runoff to Be Treated: 0.27

Downstream Defender Sizing

Flow6-1 = 1.14 x 0.139 x 453 gpm/ac-in/hr = 72 gpm
0.16 cfs
Flow6-2 = 1.14 x 0.131 x 453 gpm/ac-in/hr = 68 gpm
0.15 cfs
TOTAL= 0.31 cfs
Q100 Year= 9.24 cfs x 448.8 gal-s/cf-min = 4,147 gpm

Use 4 ft. diameter Downstream Defender Unit with bypass

Flowrate at 60% Removal Efficiency= 2.6 cfs (see chart)

LOCATION Q Size So n d Ø A WP Rh Q
FROM TO (Actual)
(ft³/s) (ft) ft/ft) (-) (ft) (deg) (ft²) (ft) (ft) (ft³/s)
CB6-1 DMH6-1 0.16 1.00 0.005 0.013 0.1700 97.40 0.089 0.85 0.10 0.16
CB6-2 DMH6-1 0.15 1.00 0.007 0.013 0.1540 92.42 0.077 0.81 0.10 0.15

Invert in Weir Manhole= 279.32

Elevation Weir= 279.49 (CB6-1)
 Job: Sharon Hills
Sheet No. 1 of 1
Calc by: SCS Date 10/23/2008
Check by: Date

Downstream Defender Sizing Calculations: DD-Re1

For sizing "Flow-Through" treatment devices as the Downstream Defender, the Massachusetts Department of
Environmental Protection has developed a relation between storm intensity and the depth of runoff (See
"Development of a Rational Basis for Designing Recharging Stormwater Control Structures adn Flow And Volume
Design Criteria" MADEP 99-06/319). This allows the sizing of the treatment unit based on a flow rate instead of a
volume. (See Table x from the report, below)

Based on the first 0.50 inches of rainfall on the mainland (off Cape-Massachusetts) with a 95% probability, use max.
storm intensity of 1.14 in/hr (Table 2).

Total Runoff Required to Be Treated

Total Impervious area: 5.31 (P30, ROOFS)

Total Roof Area: 5
Total Runoff to Be Treated: 0.31

Downstream Defender Sizing

Flow = 1.14 x 0.31 x 453 gpm/ac-in/hr = 160 gpm
0.36 cfs
Q100 Year= 3.62 cfs x 448.8 gal-s/cf-min = 1,625 gpm

Use 4 ft. diameter Downstream Defender Unit with bypass

Flowrate at 60% Removal Efficiency= 2.6 cfs (see chart)

LOCATION Q Size So n d Ø A WP Rh Q
FROM TO
(Actual)
(ft³/s) (ft) ft/ft) (-) (ft) (deg) (ft²) (ft) (ft) (ft³/s)
DMHRe1-1DMHRe1-2 0.36 1.00 0.007 0.013 0.2350 115.99 0.141 1.01 0.14 0.36

Invert in Weir Manhole= 258.15

Elevation Weir= 258.39
 Job: Sharon Hills
Sheet No. 1 of 1
Calc by: SCS Date 10/23/2008
Check by: Date

Downstream Defender Sizing Calculations: DD-P7

For sizing "Flow-Through" treatment devices as the Downstream Defender, the Massachusetts Department of
Environmental Protection has developed a relation between storm intensity and the depth of runoff (See
"Development of a Rational Basis for Designing Recharging Stormwater Control Structures adn Flow And Volume
Design Criteria" MADEP 99-06/319). This allows the sizing of the treatment unit based on a flow rate instead of a
volume. (See Table x from the report, below)

Based on the first 0.50 inches of rainfall on the mainland (off Cape-Massachusetts) with a 95% probability, use max.
storm intensity of 1.14 in/hr (Table 2).

Total Runoff Required to Be Treated

Total Impervious area: 0.3 (P21)

Total Roof Area: 0
Total Runoff to Be Treated: 0.3

Downstream Defender Sizing

Flow6-1 = 1.14 x 0.15 x 453 gpm/ac-in/hr = 77 gpm
0.17 cfs
Flow6-2 = 1.14 x 0.15 x 453 gpm/ac-in/hr = 77 gpm
0.17 cfs
TOTAL= 0.35 cfs
Q100 Year= 14.68 cfs x 448.8 gal-s/cf-min = 6,588 gpm

Use 4 ft. diameter Downstream Defender Unit with bypass

Flowrate at 60% Removal Efficiency= 2.6 cfs (see chart)

LOCATION Q Size So n d Ø A WP Rh Q
FROM TO (Actual)
(ft³/s) (ft) ft/ft) (-) (ft) (deg) (ft²) (ft) (ft) (ft³/s)
DCB7-1 DMH7-1 0.17 1.00 0.005 0.013 0.1750 98.92 0.092 0.86 0.11 0.17
DCB7-2 DMH7-1 0.17 1.00 0.005 0.013 0.1750 98.92 0.092 0.86 0.11 0.17

Invert in Weir Manhole= 273.26

Elevation Weir= 273.44
 Job: Sharon Hills
Sheet No. 1 of 1
Calc by: SCS Date 10/23/2008
Check by: Date

Aquafilter Sizing Calculations: AF1

For sizing "Flow-Through" treatment devices as the Downstream Defender, the Massachusetts Department of
Environmental Protection has developed a relation between storm intensity and the depth of runoff (See
"Development of a Rational Basis for Designing Recharging Stormwater Control Structures adn Flow And
Volume Design Criteria" MADEP 99-06/319). This allows the sizing of the treatment unit based on a flow rate
instead of a volume. (See Table x from the report, below)

Based on the first 0.50 inches of rainfall on the mainland (off Cape-Massachusetts) with a 95% probability, use
max. storm intensity of 1.14 in/hr (Table 2).

Total Runoff Required to Be Treated

Total Impervious area: 1.62 (P22)

Total Roof Area: 0
Total Runoff to Be Treated: 1.62

Aquafilter Sizing
Flow = 1.14 x 1.62 x 453 gpm/ac-in/= 837 gpm
1.9 cfs

Use AF4.4 Offline Unit (2.0 cfs capacity)

LOCATION Q Size So n d Ø A WP Rh Q
FROM TO (Actual)
(ft³/s) (ft) ft/ft) (-) (ft) (deg) (ft²) (ft) (ft) (ft³/s)
DMH8-9 DMH8-10 1.90 1.50 0.014 0.013 0.3960 123.67 0.373 1.62 0.23 1.90

Invert in Weir Manhole= 288.57

Elevation Weir= 288.97
 Job: Sharon Hills
Sheet No. 1 of 1
Calc by: SCS Date 10/23/2008
Check by: Date

Downstream Defender Sizing Calculations: DD 9-1

For sizing "Flow-Through" treatment devices as the Downstream Defender, the Massachusetts Department of
Environmental Protection has developed a relation between storm intensity and the depth of runoff (See
"Development of a Rational Basis for Designing Recharging Stormwater Control Structures adn Flow And
Volume Design Criteria" MADEP 99-06/319). This allows the sizing of the treatment unit based on a flow rate
instead of a volume. (See Table x from the report, below)

Based on the first 0.50 inches of rainfall on the mainland (off Cape-Massachusetts) with a 95% probability, use
max. storm intensity of 1.14 in/hr (Table 2).

Total Runoff Required to Be Treated

Total Impervious area: 0.11 (Portion of P33: CB9-1 - CB9-2)

Total Roof Area: 0.00
Total Runoff to Be Treated: 0.11

Downstream Defender Sizing

Flow = 1.14 x 0.11 x 453 gpm/ac-in/ = 58 gpm
0.1 cfs
Q100 Year= 1.73 cfs x 448.8 gal-s/cf-min= 776 gpm

Use 4 ft. diameter Downstream Defender Inline Unit (1,350 gpm capacity)
 Job: Sharon Hills
Sheet No. 1 of 1
Calc by: SCS Date 11/7/2008
Check by: Date

Downstream Defender Sizing Calculations: DD 9-2

For sizing "Flow-Through" treatment devices as the Downstream Defender, the Massachusetts Department of
Environmental Protection has developed a relation between storm intensity and the depth of runoff (See
"Development of a Rational Basis for Designing Recharging Stormwater Control Structures adn Flow And
Volume Design Criteria" MADEP 99-06/319). This allows the sizing of the treatment unit based on a flow rate
instead of a volume. (See Table x from the report, below)

Based on the first 0.50 inches of rainfall on the mainland (off Cape-Massachusetts) with a 95% probability, use
max. storm intensity of 1.14 in/hr (Table 2).

Total Runoff Required to Be Treated

Total Impervious area: 0.10 (Portion of P33: CB9-3 - CB9-4)

Total Roof Area: 0.00
Total Runoff to Be Treated: 0.10

Downstream Defender Sizing

Flow = 1.14 x 0.1 x 453 gpm/ac-in/ = 52 gpm
0.1 cfs
Q100 Year= 1.73 cfs x 448.8 gal-s/cf-min= 776 gpm

Use 4 ft. diameter Downstream Defender Inline Unit (1,350 gpm capacity)