You are on page 1of 4

External Technical Review:

Review Record
Revision Number Revised by 1 Date Received Package Date submitted Brief Description of Changes

159996536.xlsx.ms_office

Page 1 of 4

External Technical Review:

Project

Al Zubair Hospital
Discipline

Structure
Reviewer Evaluation of Response Reviewer's Recommendation Comment Types A B C Accept as is Accept with comments Reject with comments Okay to close: Satisfied with response Okay to close: Low risk - Contractor to action comment. Dissatisfied with response Requires further discussion Resolution agreed-waiting to review design docs

Insert rows above cursor as needed using 'Insert' menu item in the standard toolbar at top of window.
Reviewer to fill in these columns Item No. Reference: Page, Report Section, or Drawing No. and Revision Reviewer Reviewer's Comment (all revised comments to be contained within same cell, including date revised comment made) Select Comment Type Date of comments Responder / Firm to complete these columns Responder / Firm Responder/Firm's Response (follow-up responses to be contained within same cell, including the date of that response) Reviewer evaluation and input after Responder/ Firm responds to comments Reviewer: Please select your evaluation of the response Reviewer's comments/ recommendations related to the response Select Revised Comment Type

SD Stage 2b, DRAWINGS

SB

At this design stage, the following drawings would be expected which have not been provided: - Structural GA drawings at every floor level, including typical structural member sizes and slab thicknesses, - Long and short cross section through the each building - Typical structural details Formwork drawings are not appropriate at this design stage.

15-May

TIMKA *Structural GA drawings at every floor level, including typical structural ENGINEERING member sizes and slab thicknesses provided. *Long and short cross section drawings through each building attached. *This is a preliminary technical drawings. At application project all details will be send to your side. Application process will be done with communication and with our last application project

SD Stage 2b, BLOCK A REPORT

SB

Provide a clear Design Philosophy Statement, including: - Design Standards adopted - Specific Design Loads (not extract of table from BS 6399) - Clear description of the structural system and lateral stability - Description of the Design/Analysis Approach

15-May

TIMKA *Design standards references reduced and clearly defined which load ENGINEERING is taken * Clear description of the structural system is mentioned in the general report at the beginning of the report. *Design/Analysis approach detailed in the report

SD Stage 2b, BLOCK A REPORT

SB

Level of analysis output is not appropriate for this design stage. Typical member sizes are sufficient, with appropriate analysis to justify these sizes.

15-May

TIMKA *Level of analysis output is detailed preliminary static report. ENGINEERING All seismic, static and reinforced concrete detailed calculation results shown in static report. From all this information all member sizes are sufficient as shown in the report. TIMKA Full soil investigation report included. ENGINEERING

Okay to close: Low risk - Contractor to Quality of some drawings not good - in particular the overall building which is not action comment. legible (ref AH-DWG-CIV-DES-BH-1101-0 Model). Review line scales when printing to pdf. Provide each drawing on a separate page. (Some pages contain three drawings) Note, typical beams are 300mm wide x 500mm deep and 600mm wide x 500mm deep. Design Loads: Requires further discussion - Imposed loads in corridors and other trafficked areas and plant rooms will be significantly more than 2kPa. - Dead loads from specialist hospital equipment (e.g. xrays, MRI etc) need to be allowed for in the design. - Wind loads?? (These do not appear to have been considered) - Temperature loads - what has been allowed for? - Line loads, e.g. from cladding? Okay to close: Low risk - Contractor to Level of output is unnecessary for this design stage. It is sufficient to provide load action comment. diagrams, stress, shear and bending plots and hand calculations to justify member sizes / typical reinforcement rates required. Requires further discussion Soil Report: Has soil report been queried? Conclusions suggest allowable ground bearing pressure of 60kPa (Pg 26), however in design parameters 120kPa (Table 6.2) is suggested.

SD Stage 2b, BLOCK A REPORT

SB

Provide full soil investigation report.

15-May

SD Stage 2b, BLOCK B REPORT

SB

Provide a clear Design Philosophy Statement, including: - Design Standards adopted - Specific Design Loads (not extract of table from BS 6399) - Clear description of the structural system and lateral stability - Description of the Design/Analysis Approach

15-May

TIMKA *Design standards references reduced and clearly defined which load ENGINEERING is taken * Clear description of the structural system is mentioned in the general report at the beginning of the report. *Design/Analysis approach detailed in the report

SD Stage 2b, BLOCK B REPORT

SB

Level of analysis output is not appropriate for this design stage. Typical member sizes are sufficient, with appropriate analysis to justify these sizes.

15-May

TIMKA *Level of analysis output is detailed preliminary static report. ENGINEERING All seismic, static and reinforced concrete detailed calculation results shown in static report. From all this information all member sizes are sufficient as shown in the report. TIMKA Full soil investigation report included. ENGINEERING

Design Loads: - Imposed loads in corridors and other trafficked areas and plant rooms will be significantly more than 2kPa. - Dead loads from specialist hospital equipment (e.g. xrays, MRI etc) need to be allowed for in the design. - Wind loads?? (These do not appear to have been considered) - Temperature loads - what has been allowed for? - Line loads, e.g. from cladding? Okay to close: Low risk - Contractor to Level of output is unnecessary for this design stage. It is sufficient to provide load action comment. diagrams, stress, shear and bending plots and hand calculations to justify member sizes / typical reinforcement rates required. Requires further discussion Requires further discussion Soil Report: Has soil report been queried? Conclusions suggest allowable ground bearing pressure of 60kPa (Pg 26), however in design parameters 120kPa (Table 6.2) is suggested.

SD Stage 2b, BLOCK B REPORT

SB

Provide full soil investigation report.

15-May

159996536.xlsx.ms_office

Page 2 of 5

External Technical Review:

Reviewer to fill in these columns Item No. 8 Reference: Page, Report Section, or Drawing No. and Revision SD Stage 2b, BLOCK C REPORT Reviewer SB Reviewer's Comment (all revised comments to be contained within same cell, including date revised comment made) Provide a clear Design Philosophy Statement, including: - Design Standards adopted - Specific Design Loads (not extract of table from BS 6399) - Clear description of the structural system and lateral stability - Description of the Design/Analysis Approach Select Comment Type C Date of comments 15-May

Responder / Firm to complete these columns Responder / Firm Responder/Firm's Response (follow-up responses to be contained within same cell, including the date of that response)

Reviewer evaluation and input after Responder/ Firm responds to comments Reviewer: Please select your evaluation of the response Requires further discussion Reviewer's comments/ recommendations related to the response Select Revised Comment Type B

TIMKA *Design standards references reduced and clearly defined which load ENGINEERING is taken * Clear description of the structural system is mentioned in the general report at the beginning of the report. *Design/Analysis approach detailed in the report

SD Stage 2b, BLOCK C REPORT

SB

Level of analysis output is not appropriate for this design stage. Typical member sizes are sufficient, with appropriate analysis to justify these sizes.

15-May

TIMKA *Level of analysis output is detailed preliminary static report. ENGINEERING All seismic, static and reinforced concrete detailed calculation results shown in static report. From all this information all member sizes are sufficient as shown in the report. TIMKA Full soil investigation report included. ENGINEERING

Design Loads: - Imposed loads in corridors and other trafficked areas and plant rooms will be significantly more than 2kPa. - Dead loads from specialist hospital equipment (e.g. xrays, MRI etc) need to be allowed for in the design. - Wind loads?? (These do not appear to have been considered) - Temperature loads - what has been allowed for? - Line loads, e.g. from cladding? Okay to close: Low risk - Contractor to Level of output is unnecessary for this design stage. It is sufficient to provide load action comment. diagrams, stress, shear and bending plots and hand calculations to justify member sizes / typical reinforcement rates required. Requires further discussion Soil Report: Has soil report been queried? Conclusions suggest allowable ground bearing pressure of 60kPa (Pg 26), however in design parameters 120kPa (Table 6.2) is suggested.

10

SD Stage 2b, BLOCK C REPORT

SB

Provide full soil investigation report.

15-May

11

SD Stage 2b, BLOCK D REPORT

SB

Provide a clear Design Philosophy Statement, including: - Design Standards adopted - Specific Design Loads (not extract of table from BS 6399) - Clear description of the structural system and lateral stability - Description of the Design/Analysis Approach

15-May

TIMKA *Design standards references reduced and clearly defined which load ENGINEERING is taken * Clear description of the structural system is mentioned in the general report at the beginning of the report. *Design/Analysis approach detailed in the report

12

SD Stage 2b, BLOCK D REPORT

SB

Level of analysis output is not appropriate for this design stage. Typical member sizes are sufficient, with appropriate analysis to justify these sizes.

15-May

TIMKA *Level of analysis output is detailed preliminary static report. ENGINEERING All seismic, static and reinforced concrete detailed calculation results shown in static report. From all this information all member sizes are sufficient as shown in the report. TIMKA Full soil investigation report included. ENGINEERING

Design Loads: - Imposed loads in corridors and other trafficked areas and plant rooms will be significantly more than 2kPa. - Dead loads from specialist hospital equipment (e.g. xrays, MRI etc) need to be allowed for in the design. - Wind loads?? (These do not appear to have been considered) - Temperature loads - what has been allowed for? - Line loads, e.g. from cladding? Okay to close: Low risk - Contractor to Level of output is unnecessary for this design stage. It is sufficient to provide load action comment. diagrams, stress, shear and bending plots and hand calculations to justify member sizes / typical reinforcement rates required. Requires further discussion Requires further discussion Soil Report: Has soil report been queried? Conclusions suggest allowable ground bearing pressure of 60kPa (Pg 26), however in design parameters 120kPa (Table 6.2) is suggested.

13

SD Stage 2b, BLOCK D REPORT

SB

Provide full soil investigation report.

15-May

14

SD Stage 2b, BLOCK E REPORT

SB

Provide a clear Design Philosophy Statement, including: - Design Standards adopted - Specific Design Loads (not extract of table from BS 6399) - Clear description of the structural system and lateral stability - Description of the Design/Analysis Approach

15-May

TIMKA *Design standards references reduced and clearly defined which load ENGINEERING is taken * Clear description of the structural system is mentioned in the general report at the beginning of the report. *Design/Analysis approach detailed in the report

15

SD Stage 2b, BLOCK E REPORT

SB

Level of analysis output is not appropriate for this design stage. Typical member sizes are sufficient, with appropriate analysis to justify these sizes.

15-May

TIMKA *Level of analysis output is detailed preliminary static report. ENGINEERING All seismic, static and reinforced concrete detailed calculation results shown in static report. From all this information all member sizes are sufficient as shown in the report. TIMKA Full soil investigation report included. ENGINEERING

Design Loads: - Imposed loads in corridors and other trafficked areas and plant rooms will be significantly more than 2kPa. - Dead loads from specialist hospital equipment (e.g. xrays, MRI etc) need to be allowed for in the design. - Wind loads?? (These do not appear to have been considered) - Temperature loads - what has been allowed for? - Line loads, e.g. from cladding? Okay to close: Low risk - Contractor to Level of output is unnecessary for this design stage. It is sufficient to provide load action comment. diagrams, stress, shear and bending plots and hand calculations to justify member sizes / typical reinforcement rates required. Requires further discussion Requires further discussion Soil Report: Has soil report been queried? Conclusions suggest allowable ground bearing pressure of 60kPa (Pg 26), however in design parameters 120kPa (Table 6.2) is suggested.

16

SD Stage 2b, BLOCK E REPORT

SB

Provide full soil investigation report.

15-May

17

SD Stage 2b, BLOCK F REPORT

SB

Provide a clear Design Philosophy Statement, including: - Design Standards adopted - Specific Design Loads (not extract of table from BS 6399) - Clear description of the structural system and lateral stability - Description of the Design/Analysis Approach

15-May

TIMKA *Design standards references reduced and clearly defined which load ENGINEERING is taken * Clear description of the structural system is mentioned in the general report at the beginning of the report. *Design/Analysis approach detailed in the report

18

SD Stage 2b, BLOCK F REPORT

SB

Level of analysis output is not appropriate for this design stage. Typical member sizes are sufficient, with appropriate analysis to justify these sizes.

15-May

TIMKA *Level of analysis output is detailed preliminary static report. ENGINEERING All seismic, static and reinforced concrete detailed calculation results shown in static report. From all this information all member sizes are sufficient as shown in the report.

Design Loads: - Imposed loads in corridors and other trafficked areas and plant rooms will be significantly more than 2kPa. - Dead loads from specialist hospital equipment (e.g. xrays, MRI etc) need to be allowed for in the design. - Wind loads?? (These do not appear to have been considered) - Temperature loads - what has been allowed for? - Line loads, e.g. from cladding? Okay to close: Low risk - Contractor to Level of output is unnecessary for this design stage. It is sufficient to provide load action comment. diagrams, stress, shear and bending plots and hand calculations to justify member sizes / typical reinforcement rates required. Requires further discussion

159996536.xlsx.ms_office

Page 3 of 5

External Technical Review:

Reviewer to fill in these columns Item No. 19 Reference: Page, Report Section, or Drawing No. and Revision SD Stage 2b, BLOCK F REPORT Reviewer SB Reviewer's Comment (all revised comments to be contained within same cell, including date revised comment made) Provide full soil investigation report. Select Comment Type C Date of comments 15-May

Responder / Firm to complete these columns Responder / Firm Responder/Firm's Response (follow-up responses to be contained within same cell, including the date of that response)

Reviewer evaluation and input after Responder/ Firm responds to comments Reviewer: Please select your evaluation of the response Requires further discussion Reviewer's comments/ recommendations related to the response Soil Report: Has soil report been queried? Conclusions suggest allowable ground bearing pressure of 60kPa (Pg 26), however in design parameters 120kPa (Table 6.2) is suggested. Select Revised Comment Type B

TIMKA Full soil investigation report included. ENGINEERING

20

SD Stage 2b, BLOCK D REPORT

SB

Shear wall modelled between GL N-O is not shown on drawings.

29-May

TIMKA Missing shear walls added to drawings ENGINEERING

21

SD Stage 2b, BLOCK B DRAWINGS & REPORT

SB

Long span beams between GL L-N+ depth is the same as all other beams, despite span being significantly longer. Provide design justification. This portion of the building is missing in the ETABS model.

29-May

TIMKA This part of the building designed steel at first but later concrete ENGINEERING designed accepted. So, we will send you calculations at the last report.

22

SD Stage 2b, BLOCK C & D REPORTS

SB

How has the raft been modelled in ETABS? Have springs been assigned? Provide calculations to justify. How will relative movement between raft foundation and shallow pads be accomodated within the ground floor design? Foundation plan has not been provided. No comments on plans and section provided.

29-May

TIMKA Raft foundation modeled as a shell member in the ETABS. Also, ENGINEERING springs have been assigned on raft foundation. (10000kN/m). We provide more detailed calculations at last report.

23

SD Stage 2b, STAFF RESIDENCES DRAWINGS

SB

29-May

TIMKA Foundation plan provided with this current email. ENGINEERING

24

SD Stage 2b, STAFF RESIDENCES REPORT

SB

Design Loads: - Confirm imposed loads for residences building - Wind loads?? These do not appear to have been considered. - Are there any rooms with specialist equipment or plant which would need to be considered in the slab design? - Temperature - what has been allowed for in the design? - Line loads, e,g from cladding? Deflections: - Has deflection been checked? Please confirm slabs & beams perform within allowable limits. Refer to comments above regarding design laods and deflections.

29-May

TIMKA Design loads are demonstrated in the last static reports briefly. ENGINEERING

25

SD Stage 2b, SERVICES BUILDING REPORT

SB

29-May

TIMKA All the design controlled and so as the deflections. ENGINEERING

26

SD Stage 2b, SERVICES BUILDING DRAWINGS

SB

No comments

29-May

TIMKA ENGINEERING

159996536.xlsx.ms_office

Page 4 of 5

You might also like