You are on page 1of 7

Malaysia's clash of cultures

By Jonathan Kent BBC, Kuala Lumpur

When it comes to interpreting Islam, many Malaysians are torn between their own culture, Western influence and a growing

Modernisation has been rapid

trend towards copying all things Arabic. A few days ago I visited P Ramlee's old house in Kuala Lumpur. Unless you are from this part of the world you probably will not have heard of him. But in Malaysia, more than 30 years after his death, he is still an icon. In life he was Malaysia's Elvis and Frank Sinatra, Cary Grant and Irving Berlin all rolled into one. His modest bungalow is now a museum. But when I visited I was alone, apart from an attendant who seemed to be hiding under his counter. So I wandered around looking at photos from P Ramlee's films and listening to his wonderful singing voice. 'Gentle and sensual' One of the reasons I look forward to the holidays here is because the local TV stations always screen a good selection of his movies.

My favourite is the comedy Madu Tiga - or Three Honies - made in 1964.

P Ramlee was an actor, singer, comedian, songwriter, screenwriter and film director

P Ramlee plays a married man who decides to take a second and then a third bride, all with the collusion of his first wife's mischievous father. But despite his best efforts to keep the three from finding out about one another, inevitably they meet, become friends and finally gang up on him. It is a cautionary tale. But what is most striking about P Ramlee's films from the 1950s and 1960s is their depiction of Malay life. His movies are gentle and sensual, the people relaxed, fun-loving and charming. There are even jokes about gin. Shadow puppetry One can still catch glimpses of a Malaysia P Ramlee would have recognised, in backwaters like the east coast state of Kelantan.

I had travelled deep into its countryside looking for Dollah Baju Merah-Abdullah, who wears a red shirt. He is the last performer of the local brand of Wayang Kulit: shadow puppetry.

Hindu influence can be seen in carvings

"I can't speak well," he told me, when he came out onto the porch of his little wooden house to greet me and he tapped his chest. "I've been ill," he said. He was not up to giving a demonstration but half-heartedly pulled out a couple of puppets from a box to show me. I could see instantly why his is a dying art. The puppets depict heroes and gods from the Hindu epics the Ramayana and the Mahabharata. The local government in Kelantan put a stop to Dollah's performances. Likewise traditional dance. They are considered un-Islamic. Foreign endorsement Elsewhere in Kelantan I met up with Nik Rashidee, the custodian of an astonishing collection of Malay woodcarvings assembled by his late brother Nik Rashidin, the greatest carver of his age. Among the antique pieces the Hindu influence is obvious: carvings of Garuda (a Hindu deity and king of the birds) and dagger handles in the shape of Shiva's head.

They were not even exhibited in Malaysia until they had already been shown at the British Museum.
Traditional carving is a dying art in Malaysia

It took the endorsement of a foreign institution before locals even started to wake up to their beauty. All these crafts are being destined to oblivion, not just by conservative Muslims who dress in the Arabic style and frown on their own culture, but also by Malaysia's rapid modernisation. Malay people seem to love the new and shiny, not the old. Whirlwind of change At the same time they have been consumed by a wave of Islamicisation that swept across the world from the 1970s, a wave ridden by Malay politicians who after the Iranian revolution decided it was that, or be drowned by it. "Now we understand what it is to be proper Muslims," people tell me, and in this rapidly developing country many have found in their faith a still centre in a whirlwind of change. But it is not just traditional arts that are under pressure. Looking at posters from P Ramlee's movies, I realise that films like these could not be made today. "All we can do these days is tut tut at one another," a Malay friend tells me. Across the country one sees the evidence of a culture of disapproval. Young Malay women wear headscarves drawn tight around their faces; something their grandmothers never did. Nightclubs are raided by the religious police, couples are prosecuted for holding hands and Muslims are sentenced to be whipped for drinking beer. This is not policy. This comes from the conservative grassroots.

Behind closed doors The federal government seems unsure how to respond. Those who raise their voices against the new breed of religious teacher, schooled in Egypt, Saudi Arabia or Pakistan, are shouted down. "Kaffir," they scream. And jokes about gin are just not seen as funny. But the saddest encounter I had in Kelantan was with a criminal lawyer. "What keeps you busy?" I asked. "Rape," he said. "It's all rape." Incest, drugs and rape afflict the Malay community far worse than Malaysia's large Chinese and Indian minorities. Piety in public. Acts that lead to self-loathing behind closed doors. There is a sense that the Malays are a people increasingly adrift, and as at ill at ease with themselves now, as their grandparents' generation appeared content. It would have broken P Ramlee's heart.

Its a matter of attitude - Tay Tian Yan


J UL Y 2 6, 20 13

I asked my Muslim friend Johar whether work was particularly tough during the Ramadan month. He was somewhat puzzled: "Tough? Any difference?" Johar is the manager of a restaurant I frequent for my breakfast. His passion for his work and amiability have built up a good rapport between him and his customers.

"What I was trying to say is that now is the fasting month but you still have to entertain your customers, sometimes helping to prepare food inside the kitchen.Won't that contravene your religion?" He replied, "That is my job. As for myself, I am still fasting." I was worried he could have misunderstood me, so I quickly clarified that I felt uneasy having him to serve me food during the fasting month. Much more relaxed now, Johar said, "So long as we don't take the food, there isn't any problem serving food to other people. My religious teacher told me, if we are holding food in our hands but deep inside us there is no desire for it, our heart is still sincere and pure." It appeared that I had acted overzealously. "It doesn't matter. Muslims must refrain from food during daytime in the Ramadan but you non-Muslims can still enjoy your food. This is very normal, and we all have our own ways of living." Looking at him, I really felt he was such a lovely guy. Johar is no religious cleric, no profound doctrines and morals. He is just an ordinary Muslim that upholds Malaysians' ways of living. He never grumbles about his job throughout the Ramadan. Instead, he willingly bears his job responsibility and respects the needs of his customers. That dialogue with Johar was taking place actually during the Ramadan month a couple of years ago. From what he told me, I came to understand the more open and pragmatic face of Islam. Muslims are required to refrain from food during the holy fasting month, but they would never interfere the dietary needs of non-Muslims. Moreover, Muslims can also serve food to their customers during the Ramadan. This is part of the value of Malaysia's diversity. People embracing different religions have their own beliefs and ways of living, but they will never impose the same onto other people. The incident taking place recently at a Sungai Buloh school has triggered powerful backlash in our society. Many Muslims also feel it is inappropriate for the school

authorities to come up with such a ruling, thinking that such a move has violated the most fundamental mutual respect among people of different religions in this country. In a diverse and open society, everyone must respect the fasting of Muslims while the dietary needs of non-Muslims must also be equally respected. We don't care whether the school authorities have explained how clean and hygienic the changing room is, but it remains whether their intention has been that clean. When a group of students are made to take their lunch in a changing room, it is as if to imply that their way of living is unclean or inappropriate such that their action has to be shielded from public vision. The school facilities are open premises which can be used by any student, Muslim or non-Muslim. The point with putting non-Muslims in the changing room for lunch is not so much about the hygiene level of the changing room, but the haughty attitude that has distorted the meaning of cultural diversity. The shift in an attitude not merely affects a school, but could expand to influence the entire nation.

The two opposing attitudes of restaurant manager Johar and school principle Nasir are in essence impacting the future of this nation. - mysinchew.com, July 26, 2013.

You might also like