Professional Documents
Culture Documents
6
5 - SMR L/ ENR25 (5phr)/ 1.30P (4phr)
5
6 - SMR L/ ENR25 (5phr)/ 1.28E (4phr)
4
3
2
0 2 4 6 8 10 Filler content of 4 phr have been choosen
Filler content (phr) for the comparison because the compound
1.30P 1.30TC 1.28E shows the highest tensile properties at this
level of filler loading. The organoclay
FIG 1: t90 of compounds with different nanocomposites shows higher tensile
filler content (phr). strength than carbon black (CB) and silica
filled compounds(Fig 2). The silicate
From Figure 1, it shows tipical trend for surface area in organoclay contributes a
these three types of fillers. The t90 of the better dispersion of the organoclay in
compounds was sharply decrease at 2phr natural rubber(3).
filler content then followed by a gradual
decrease upon further addition of the filler.
This is caused by the amine functionalities
in the filler after the modification process CONCLUSION
or ion exchange process.(3) The amine
containing compounds will facilitate the The t90 of the compounds was influenced
curing reaction of natural rubber stocks. by the filler content.
The organoclay could enhance the
Mechanical Properties performance of natural rubber. It could
compete with the carbon black and silica.
Figure 2 and 3 illustrates the influence of
the different type nanoclays on the tensile
properties of NR/organoclay compounds.
REFERENCES
35
Tensile Strength (MPa)