Franky goes to court making it clear what they must do Kill Franky To Attorney General http://www.scribd.

com/doc/163624768/Dear-Attorney-General

Since 1648 Benevolent elusive Legals appropriate traditional evasion Demonstrable Be Late D STATISTICS Sovereign State Authority Testament Intervention Substantive Thick Imperialist Capitalist Spirit To say the least a quick fix mandatory 31 year retroactive Constitution Act, 1982 www.Justice13.com

The United Nations

currently only requires that a sovereign state has an effective and independent government within a defined territory. According to current international law norms, states are only required to have an effective and independent system of government pursuant to a community within a defined territory.[2] For centuries past, the idea that a state could be sovereign was always connected to its

ability to guarantee the best interests of its own citizens.

Thus, if a state could not act in the best interests of its own citizens, it could not be thought of as a sovereign state.[3] The concept of sovereignty has been discussed, debated and questioned throughout history, from the time of the Romans through to the present day. It has changed in its definition, concept, and application throughout, especially during the Age of Enlightenment.

The current notion of state sovereignty is often traced back to the Peace of Westphalia (1648), which, in relation to states,

codified
the basic principles: territorial integrity

border inviolability supremacy of the state (rather than the Church) a sovereign is the supreme lawmaking authority within its jurisdiction.
[edit] Age of Enlightenment
Hobbes, in Leviathan (1651) introduced an early version of the social contract (or contractarian) theory, arguing that to overcome the "nasty, brutish and short" quality of life without the cooperation of other human beings, people must join in a "commonwealth" and submit to a "Soveraigne [sic] Power"

that is able to compel them to act in the common good.

This expediency argument attracted many of the early proponents of sovereignty. Hobbes deduced from the definition of sovereignty that it must be:[citation needed] Absolute: because conditions could only be imposed on a sovereign if there were some outside arbitrator to determine when he had violated them,

in which case the sovereign would not be the final authority.

Indivisible: The sovereign is the only final authority in his territory; he does not share final authority with any other entity. Hobbes held this to be true because otherwise there would be no way of resolving a disagreement between the multiple authorities.

Hobbes' hypothesis that the ruler's sovereignty is contracted to him by the people in return for his maintaining their safety, led him to conclude that if the ruler fails to do this, the people are released from their obligation to obey him. Bodin's and Hobbes's theories would decisively shape the concept of sovereignty, which we can find again in the social contract theories, for example, in Rousseau's (17121778) definition of popular sovereignty (with early antecedents in Francisco Surez's theory of the origin of power), which only differs in that he considers

the people to be the legitimate sovereign.

Likewise, it is inalienable

Rousseau condemned the distinction between the origin and the exercise of sovereignty,
a distinction upon which constitutional monarchy or representative democracy are founded. Niccol Machiavelli, Thomas Hobbes, John Locke, and Montesquieu are also key figures in the unfolding of the concept of sovereignty.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Democracy

Popular sovereignty or the sovereignty of the people is the belief

that the legitimacy of the state is created by the will or consent of its people,

who are the source of all political power.

It is closely associated to the social contract philosophers, among whom are Thomas Hobbes, John Locke and Jean-Jacques Rousseau. Popular sovereignty expresses a concept and does not necessarily reflect or describe a political reality.
[1]

It is often contrasted with the concept of

parliamentary sovereignty, and with individual sovereignty. Benjamin Franklin expressed the concept when he wrote, "In free governments, the rulers are the servants and the people their superiors and sovereign" http://www.scribd.com/doc/149878237/They-of-the-Material-World-Cannot-Touch-the-Spirit-of-theLaw-as-It-Is WW III World Wide Invisible Invincible Inalienable www.FrankyGoesToCourt.info Imperative to activate the Spirit immediately prior to DIE Divine Intervention Evil-angel-ists www.911Bushwhack.com Yes SIR Syria Iraq Repeat Certainly a bias interest what about you? http://www.scribd.com/doc/163624768/Dear-Attorney-General