Professional Documents
Culture Documents
PREFACE
Way back in 1970, the legendary Economist, Milton Friedman wrote in an article in New York Times
arguing that the only social responsibility of business is to increase its profits. Since 1970 we have come a long
way and today the concept of 'Triple bottom line' (financial, social and environmental or to put it simply, people,
planet and profit) is beginning to gain ground. As the Indian economy begins to globalise and we enter the so
called knowledge century, this concept will have to take strong roots and become an integral part of running the
business. Organisation of Pharmaceutical Producers of India (OPPI) recently scanned about two dozen annual
reports of large listed pharmaceutical corporations and without fail each corporation highlighted its Corporate
Social Responsibility (CSR) or Corporate Philanthropy which ranged from donations, to charity, to cause related
marketing. Unfortunately, most programmes were diffused barring few exceptions and targeted towards
goodwill among employees, customers and the community in which they live and had little to do with social
investment as a business strategy. Time has now come to move one notch beyond the conventional meaning
and use it as a strategic and competitive advantage.
Management thinkers like Michael Porter and C.K. Prahlad have articulated this concept very lucidly in
their recent articles. Emerging economies like India and China have often faced the dilemma of balancing
economic growth with social objectives and often there is a feeling that these two goals are intrinsically
conflicting. In reality, and in the long term, social and economic goals are not conflicting but integrally
connected. Realising the importance of this subject, OPPI in collaboration with SPJIMR (S.P. Jain Institute of
Management & Research) has completed a research project to study how the Pharmaceutical Industry in India,
whose primary mission is to improve the quality of life of its customers through its products and services, can
leverage this strength for sustainable business growth. We thank all the OPPI Members who contributed
generously to this study.
We congratulate SPJIMR for completing this Research Project on “Corporate Social Responsibility
of Pharmaceutical Companies in India” and hope that our members as well as Industry in general gain
adequate insights in honing their business strategies for making CSR an effective tool.
i ii
S.P. Jain Institute of Management & Research
Munshi Nagar Tel : +91+22+2623 0396/2401/7454
Dadabhai Road, Andheri (W) Fax : +91-22-2623 7042
Mumbai 400 058, India Website : www.spjimr.org
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
S.P. Jain Institute of Management & Research (SPJIMR) is thankful to the Organisation of Pharmaceutical
Producers of India (OPPI) for giving us the opportunity to work on this project.
SPJIMR also thanks all the OPPI member companies who have taken time out to respond to our
questionnaires that were used for the survey.
We appreciate the efforts taken by Dr. Ajit Dangi and Mr. Homi Bhabha from OPPI for their inputs and
suggestions.
SPJIMR's Dr. M.L.Shrikant - Hon. Dean, Prof. S.D. Kshirsagar - Faculty, Prof. Mayank Shah - Ex-Faculty,
Mr. Kapil Marwaha - Consulting Faculty and Mr. Vishal Parekh - Research Associate have been
instrumental in completion of this report.
iii
FOREWORD
potential of CSR as a vehicle for strengthening the competitive
Business has emerged as an exceedingly powerful player in an advantage of a firm. C.K. Prahlad and Allen Hammond too
increasingly interdependent world. It is hence not surprising that have highlighted the way forward for business by ”Serving the
Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) reflects and respects the poor, profitably”. CSR has traveled such a long way from
complex interdependency between business practice and wider Corporate Philanthropy to strengthening the competitive
societal concerns. How to manage this interdependency to advantage of a firm.
mutual benefit indeed for sustainability is a moot point. In other
words, corporate commitment to the triple bottom line (people,
Point of Departure What should be the thrust and scope of Corporate Social
planet, profit) is now one of the strategic tasks of corporate
Objective of this study Responsibility in the Indian context is a matter of serious
managers - study and adoption of concern. It is from this perspective that we believe the
road map for CSR.
Organisation of Pharmaceutical Producers of India (OPPI),
CSR in Indian context Notwithstanding the fact of commitment of Indian industry to commissioned S P Jain Institute of Management and Research
Unresolved issues of poverty, corporate philanthropy, most Indian companies may not have to undertake a preliminary study on CSR as practiced among its
unemployment, illiteracy latched on to the importance of adopting CSR as an element of members from which to draw a possible road map for adoption.
threat to social stability.
business sustainability.
CSR today In reality, scope of CSR has continued to evolve from Four parts of study Section A analyses the social initiatives of pharmaceutical
CSR scope from philanthropy to philanthropy - regulatory confirmation - enlightened leadership A. Analysis of responses from companies in India based on responses to our survey and
strengthening the competitive strategic scope and more recently to addressing CSR interests OPPI members. assessing impact of their CSR activities. OPPI members engage
advantage of a firm. B. Presentation of various
for strengthening the competitive advantage of a firm. perspectives on CSR. in a wide array of activities with the focus on areas related to
C. Study of practices of various their business, viz. health care, reaching out to many
organisations. beneficiaries.
Michael Porter of Harvard Business School has advocated the D. Outlining the way forward.
v vi
Section B presents various perspectives for making the social Introduction
initiatives more effective by dovetailing it with business strategy.
It focuses on three types of social responsibilities of business, viz.
Research
economic performance, removal of adverse social impact of
Organisation of Pharmaceutical Producers of India ['OPPI'] has engaged S.P. Jain Institute of Management
economic performance and facilitating progressive social
& Research's Center for Development of Corporate Citizenship to conduct research in the area of Corporate
development and elaborating collaborative approach between
Social Responsibility ('CSR') of its member Pharmaceutical companies.
business and society within the framework of Michael Porter.
Objective of Research
Section C illustrates the said perspectives with reference to
The objectives of the said research are:
practices of the pharmaceutical industry and practices of
various pharmaceutical and non-pharmaceutical companies / 1. To survey the CSR practices of OPPI member companies; and
organisations. 2. To examine perspectives of CSR appropriate to the needs of business and society and recommend how
CSR practices of OPPI member companies can be made more effective.
Dr. M.L.Shrikant
Hon. Dean
S.P. Jain Institute of Management & Research
vii ix
INDEX
1. Executive Summary 1
4. Section C: Illustrations 93
6. Appendices 125
xi
Executive Summary Executive Summary
Based on the responses to our survey of CSR practices of OPPI member companies we found that companies The purpose of business is 'economic performance'. Business needs to achieve a certain level of profit to
engage in a wide array of activities with the highest focus on areas related to the business of the companies i.e. facilitate 'economic performance' which is expressed in the need to create and sustain competitive
healthcare. These activities reach out to a wide array of constituents of the marginalized sections, particularly advantage.
women, children and poor. The companies themselves generally carry out such activities though many
companies also partner with specialist agencies to carry out CSR programs or outsource CSR programs to The social relation of a business manifests itself in the following three responsibilities towards society: the
specialist agencies. first is 'economic performance'; the second is to remove/reduce any adverse impact on society that arises
in the course of its 'economic performance' and the ultimate social responsibility of a business is to
We noted that less than half of the companies have some kind of a specific organisational structure / department catalyze progressive social development that will focus on social growth as well as address social
- be it project coordinators, public relations department or trusts - to handle their CSR activities and that various problems. Benefits to society apart, such development is a source of significant economic opportunity
levels of management are involved in implementing CSR activities with the Board and senior management for business (beyond 'image building') as it could greatly improve the company's competitive potential or
being specifically involved in about half the cases. address the key constraints that limit productivity, innovation, growth and competitiveness.
While all companies, without exception, allocate financial resources towards CSR activities, some companies A company discharges its first social responsibility of 'economic performance' when it achieves a positive
also devote material / organisational resources towards CSR activities. At the same time 'Cheque writing' CSR EVA (Economic Value Added) for a positive EVA contributes to the economic growth of society and a
seems to be prevalent with quite a few companies. negative EVA contributes to the economic decline of society.
Though most of the companies carry out an assessment of the impact their CSR activities have majority of the A company can discharge its second social responsibility of 'removing/reducing its adverse social
companies do not prepare social / qualitative reports. impacts' by dropping the activity that causes it or minimizing the impact or making the removal of the
impact into a profitable business opportunity or working at getting the right regulation enacted so that
At the end of the day, the companies' views on the effectiveness of their CSR programs and beneficiaries differed the cost to be borne at removing such impact is not a competitive disadvantage to the company relative
- one-third of the companies believe their CSR programs have been completely effective with respect to benefits to other competitors.
to the companies. Half of the companies believe that their CSR programs have been partially effective with
respect to benefits to the company while, one company expressed dissatisfaction on such effectiveness of its CSR A company should discharge its ultimate social responsibility of catalyzing progressive social
program. development by tightly aligning its economic and social goals. Such alignment enables a company
to achieve significantly higher results with respect to both these goals compared to the
The CSR programs of close to half of the companies have received some kind of recognition by way of awards. results obtainable if these goals were pursued separately.
Notably, while majority of the companies have some kind of plan, though not detailed, in geographical terms, Companies could tightly align their economic and social goals by focusing on developing their core
relating to the size and growth of their CSR programs for the next 5 years, less than half of the companies have elements of competitive context that are embedded in the social environment.
some sort of financial / organisational plans relating to the size and growth of their CSR programs for the next 5
years. From the perspective of business, this significantly enhances its competitive advantage by upgrading its
level of talent, knowledge, infrastructure, by ushering innovation, by expanding its markets and by
In order to appreciate how CSR practices can be made more effective, it is necessary to examine various making its internal and external working environment conducive to productivity.
perspectives relating to business, its social relation and CSR:
From the perspective of society, this catalyses progressive social development by ushering social growth
and addressing social needs increasing the pool of talent, knowledge, infrastructure, satisfying needs of
weaker sections, rural prosperity, strengthening of individual well being and values.
3 4
Executive Summary Executive Summary
The detailed methodology for such alignment is explained in the main section. The various perspective mentioned above have been illustrated in this report with reference to indicated
developments; practices of the pharmaceutical industry; and practices of various pharmaceutical and non-
Developing strategies for tightly aligning economic and social goals, and implementing them, should necessarily pharmaceutical companies / organisations. In addition this report also contains illustrations of some approaches
be led by the CEO/Board of Directors of the company. Such strategies would need to be customized to the size, suggested for pharmaceutical companies.
strength and overall strategy of the company, as 'one size does not fit all'.
An important roadmap for making CSR practice of pharmaceutical companies in India more effective can be
It is possible that some social issues cannot be resolved by linking them to a company's competitive context but gleamed from the above, viz.:
which nonetheless need to be resolved since a sick society and a healthy business are not compatible.
Companies could address such issues through 'philanthropy' carried out in an effective manner. Fundamentally, companies should focus on discharging all three responsibilities to society i.e. achieving
'economic performance', minimizing adverse social impact and catalyzing social development.
In the interests of society and business itself, business should stay within three limits while catalyzing progressive
social development. Firstly, it should refrain from taking up any activity that jeopardizes its basic function of
For achieving a higher result as regards both its goals economic and social, companies should closely
'economic performance' by eroding the minimum profitability required by the risks of the business and its
align their social and economic goals. This can be achieved by focusing on the four elements of
commitments to the future. Secondly, it should refrain from taking up tasks for which it lacks competence; else it
corporate competitive context that lie embedded in the social framework, i.e.:
would only do harm to society and to itself. Thirdly, business must refrain from taking up any activity in areas in
which does not and should not have the authority implied in the responsibility for those areas.
Develop factors through direct investment (e.g. R&D) and / or through influencing / participating in
community investment e.g. involvement with foundations / government organisations / industry
Assessment of activities from a CSR perspective provides valuable feedback and facilitates reporting thereof.
associations.
Reporting on activities from a CSR perspective compels a company to assess them in the first place and also
meet the growing expectation that companies should report on their activities from a CSR perspective.
Companies can use Reporting Frameworks to aid the description of their activities encompassing all the three Develop 'demand conditions' by seeking out 'buyers' in rural areas with difficult needs to secure
social responsibilities i.e. 'economic performance', minimizing adverse social impacts and catalyzing social pressure for innovation in cost reduction or different product features and increasing focus on
development. healthcare segments requiring urgent attention.
The report also examines seven myths, which are largely responsible for molding the direction of CSR practices Improve the context for strategy and competition by undertaking in-house programs / steps to
as they stand today; viz. 'responsibility' is the same as providing succor; corporates are responsible for the promote employee values and well being, and incorporate these in routine functioning and
common social good; CSR is equal to ethics, philanthropy and public relations/image building; there is no clear influencing removal of unfair trade practices.
linkage between CSR and financial success; instead CSR prevents 'maximization of profits', the prime objective
of a company; self-interest is bad; society is distinct from a business enterprise; and the 'Stakeholder' Theory.
Contribute to developing related / supporting industries e.g. Clinical Trials industry and Hospital
These myths are seriously flawed and are expected to decline over time.
industry.
Both, Peter F. Drucker and A.P.J. Abdul Kalam convey that the Next Society of the world will be a
Social goals that cannot be aligned with economic goals nonetheless need to be addressed and these
Knowledge Society. Social change will be at the core of this Knowledge Society. Employment
can be addressed through 'philanthropy' carried out in an effective manner.
generation, high productivity, high industrial growth, empowerment of weaker sections, networked and
transparent society and rural prosperity will be both the cause and result of this Knowledge Society. It
follows that to navigate effectively in this Knowledge Society it will be imperative for companies to
pursue CSR that tightly aligns their economic and social goals.
5 6
Executive Summary
In terms of organisational effectiveness, companies should increase the involvement of the Board and
senior management in the implementation of CSR programs and strengthen CSR assessment and
reporting initiatives.
In terms of approaches, companies should explore avenues to partner with other companies in carrying
out CSR programs and stay within the above mentioned limits while catalyzing social development and
look beyond the seven myths relating to CSR.
Finally, companies must strengthen planning for CSR programs for the future.
All this can be achieved by the companies by pursuing innovation in a regular and systematic manner.
7
Section A : Survey of CSR Practices Section A : Survey of CSR Practices
1. Executive Summary
INDEX
S.P. Jain Institute of Management and Research ('SPJIMR') designed and sent questionnaires on
Corporate Social Responsibility ('CSR') practices to OPPI member companies. Based on the responses
1. Executive Summary 13
received, SPJIMR has analyzed the CSR practices of the respondent companies. A summary of these
2. Background 17 findings is presented below. This section presents further details including an analysis of CSR practices
3. Classification 18 with respect to size, age and ownership pattern of the respondents.
4. Survey findings 19
4.1. CSR activities 19 1.1. CSR activities
4.1.1. Nature of CSR activities undertaken 19
4.1.2. Geographical impact 22 · Companies engage in a wide array of activities with the highest focus on areas related to the business
of the companies i.e. healthcare.
4.2. Beneficiaries of CSR activities 23
4.3. Approach to implementing CSR activities 25
· Efforts are focused in and around the areas where the company has a presence.
4.3.1. Vehicle for implementing CSR activities 25
4.3.2. Nature of organisations supported 27
4.4. Investment in CSR 28
1.2. Beneficiaries
4.4.1. Organisational involvement in commencement
& running of the CSR activities 28
· CSR activities of the companies reach out to a wide array of constituents of the marginalized
4.4.2. Involvement of financial and other resources 31 sections, particularly women, children and poor besides patients.
4.5. Impact Assessment 35
4.5.1. Companies assessing impact 35 1.3. Approach to implementing CSR activities
4.5.2. Qualitative assessment 37
4.5.3. Quantitative assessment 38 · While most of the companies carry out CSR programs themselves, many companies also partner
4.5.4. Reporting 39 with specialist agencies to carry out CSR programs or outsource CSR programs to specialist
agencies. About one-fourth of the companies do not monitor the activities of the specialist agencies
4.6. Effectiveness of CSR 40
to which CSR activities are outsourced.
4.6.1. Benefits to the companies 40
4.6.2. Benefits to the beneficiaries 41
· NGOs receive the highest support followed by company's own projects. Government programs
4.6.3. Level of respect earned 42 receive the least support from the CSR activities of the companies.
4.6.4. Awards received 43
4.7. Future plans 44 1.4. Investment in CSR
4.8. Other Observations 45
Corporate investment in CSR activities takes the form of organisational involvement in commencement
and running of CSR activities and / or the form of involvement of financial and other resources.
11 13
Executive Summary Section A : Survey of CSR Practices
Less than half of the companies have some kind of a specific organisational structure / department - Most of the companies assess the impact of their CSR activities and monitor program
be it project coordinators, public relations department or trusts - to handle their CSR activities. implementation by way of discussions with partners.
On obtaining further information it was found that of those companies which do not have a specific Half of the companies attain direct feedback from beneficiaries.
structure to handle their CSR activities, about half appeared to entrust their CSR activities to their
Human Resource division. Quantitative assessment
The Board has initiated CSR activities in less than half of the companies. About one-third of the companies track the number of beneficiaries impacted by their CSR activities
and the amount spent thereon.
Various levels of management are involved in implementing CSR activities, with the Board and
senior management being specifically involved in about half the cases. Reporting
Financial and other resource involvement Majority of the companies do not prepare social / qualitative reports.
While all companies, without exception, allocate financial resources towards CSR activities, some
companies also devote material / organisational resources towards CSR activities.
1.6. Effectiveness of CSR
Most of the companies carry out an assessment of the impact their CSR activities have. Companies believe that they earn a fairly high level of respect from various stakeholders, in
particular, from employees and locality.
Most of the companies that carry out an impact assessment do so in qualitative terms; about half of
these do so in quantitative terms as well. The CSR programs of close to half of the companies have received some kind of recognition by way
of awards.
14 15
Section A : Survey of CSR Practices Section A : Survey of CSR Practices
Majority of the companies have some kind of plan, though not detailed, in geographical terms, With a view to understand the Corporate Social Responsibility ('CSR') practices of pharmaceutical
relating to the size and growth of their CSR programs for the next 5 years. companies in India, S.P. Jain Institute of Management and Research ('SPJIMR') designed and sent
questionnaires to OPPI member companies. The following companies responded to the questionnaires:
Less than half of the companies have some sort of financial / organisational plans relating to the size · Abbott India Ltd.
and growth of their CSR programs for the next 5 years. · Associated Capsules Group
· AstraZeneca Pharma India Ltd.
· Baxter India Pvt. Ltd.
1.8. Other observations · Becton Dickinson India Pvt. Ltd.
· Dabur Pharma
Majority of the respondents who believe that CSR enhanced the competitiveness of their company · Eli Lilly and Co. (India) Pvt. Ltd.
largely relate competitiveness with 'image building'. · Fulford (India) Ltd.
· Galderma India Pvt. Ltd.
Some of the respondents also state that they do not expect any benefits as they have carried out CSR
· GlaxoSmithKline Consumer Healthcare Ltd.
activities with non-profit / 'philanthropic' motive.
· GlaxoSmithKline Pharmaceuticals Ltd.
· Johnson & Johnson - Pharma division
No company partnered with any other pharmaceutical company to carry out any CSR program.
· Lupin Pharmaceuticals Ltd.
· Novartis India Ltd.
· Organon (India) Ltd.
· Pfizer Ltd.
· Procter & Gamble Hygiene and Health Care Ltd.
· Ranbaxy
· Raptakos, Brett & Co. Ltd.
· RPG Life Sciences Ltd.
Based on these responses, we have analyzed the CSR practices of these companies and present the
findings below*.
* We have relied upon the responses and have not performed an independent verification of the same
16 17
Section A : Survey of CSR Practices Section A : Survey of CSR Practices
The survey findings are analyzed with the help of the tabulations in the ensuing paragraphs. For such
purpose, the following classifications have been adopted: 4.1. CSR activities
Classification Basis No. of companies With a view to understand the nature of activities the respondents engaged in, each respondent was
Small Companies Turnover less than Rs.500 crores 13 asked to select from a menu of various CSR activities those areas where the respondent focused its CSR
Large Companies Turnover greater than Rs.500 crores 7 programs. In case the respondent carried out CSR activities other than those listed in the menu, the
respondent was provided the option of selecting 'Others' and providing a brief description of the activity.
Age
Based on these responses, we found that the companies focus their CSR activities mainly in the
following areas:
Classification Basis No. of companies
New Companies Less than 10 years since inception 4
Old Companies 10 years or more since inception 16
Continued on following page
Ownership
18 19
Section A : Survey of CSR Practices
20
Section A : Survey of CSR Practices Section A : Survey of CSR Practices
Overall With a view to gauging the geographical impact of the respondents' CSR activities, each respondent was
asked to identify the geographical areas to which their CSR activities extended to.