Trends of power Electronics on Renewable Energy system

S.Santhosh ,M.Iyappan Department of electrical and electronics engineering Arunai engineering college,Tiruvannamalai Email id:iyps036@gmail.com,salemsanthosheee@gmailcom

Abstract The paper focuses on the power electronics used in renewable energy systems and especially in wind and photovoltaic (PV) applications. During the last years there was a broad development in the field of power electronics which led to more efficient systems and reduction of the cost per installed kW. The inverters became more efficient and reached efficiencies in excess of 98%, while commercial solar modules reached almost 17% efficiency. Furthermore, the wind turbines use inverters of improved efficiency, reliability and regulation capabilities. In this paper the recent trends of power electronics topologies used in such systems are presented. Keywords Include at least 5 keywords or phrases

voltage. They produce electricity due to a quantummechanic process known as the photovoltaic effect [1]. A presentation of this conversion is shown on Figure 1a. There are many semiconductor materials suitable for solar cells manufacturing. The most commonly used are monocrystalline Si cells, polycrystalline Si cells and amorphous Si cells, although several other thin film technologies exist in the market. The efficiency of monocrystalline Si cells is almost 17%, for polycrystalline cells reaches almost 15%, while an efficiency of 10% is achieved in the case of amorphous Si PV cells. All PV modules have a typical current-voltage characteristic curve, used to make all necessary calculations, as shown on Figure 1b [4].

1. Introduction
The Kyoto agreement renewed interest in renewable energy systems worldwide. Many renewable energy technologies today are well developed, reliable, and cost competitive with conventional generators. The cost of renewable energy technologies is on a falling trend and is expected to fall further as demand and production increases [1], [4]. There are many renewable energy sources such as biomass, solar, wind, mini-hydro, and tidal power [6]. Power electronics find applications in most RES technologies, solar and wind energy systems being the most important applications. During the last years, there is a constant effort to improve each part of a photovoltaic (PV) and wind turbine (WT) application. The efficiency of commercial PV modules now exceeds 17%, inverters have reached almost 99% European efficiency and there are new topologies found which make WTs more efficient and flexible in their operation. Due to the increased demand, each manufacturer is trying to find new concepts in order to achieve better system yield, which results in increased economic returns for the investor. Most of the systems used in such applications produce DC current, so inverters are required to convert this power to AC, which is needed in most applications and definitely for grid connection. There are two types of PV systems: stand alone and grid connected. The first is used on remote locations, where the utility grid is not present. The grid connected systems inject power and energy directly to the utility grid. These systems have different structure and the inverters which are used have different methods to synchronize and produce clean AC power. 2. Power Electronics for PV applications The PV modules and the power electronics that convert the produced electric power by the PV modules are the basic parts of a PV installation. The PV modules comprise several solar cells which convert the energy of the sunlight directly into electricity, and are connected in a proper way (typically in series), to provide desired levels of DC current and

Figure 1a: Photovoltaic effect

PV module curve Off-grid PV systems are used in cases, where the grid is not present and the use of batteries to store energy is required, in order to cover the demand during the night or whenever energy is needed. Blocking diodes are used to prevent the

batteries to discharge on the modules during the night, while they also protect the batteries from short circuit. If more than one string is used, they also provide over-current protection of the strings in case of short circuits. Charge regulators control the charging of the batteries [1], [6]. In off-grid systems, there is the need to use dc voltage and current with stable characteristics, independent from irradiance fluctuations. Therefore, a DC DC conversion topology is used. Switch mode DC DC converters [1] are used to match the dc output of a PV generator to a variable load. Three different topologies are mostly used; step down converters, step up converters and a combination of these two. In Figure 2 simplified diagrams of these three topologies are presented.

self-commutated inverters producing AC current without synchronisation with a reference signal are used. These inverters have the responsibility to produce AC voltage and current characteristics (sinusoidal 230V/50Hz) same as those of a typical grid in order to supply off-grid loads. Otherwise, the inverter is not suitable for most electronic devices [1]. Several different semiconductor devices such as MOSFETs and IGBTs are used. The first are used in units up to 3KW, because they have the advantage of low switching losses at higher frequencies. At higher voltages and powers IGBTs are used [2]. These inverters can be single phase or three phases. A common switching technique in order to eliminate higher frequencies is the SPWM method. A general layout of a single phase inverter with half bridge and full bridge topology is shown in figure 3a, b. In the half bridge topology, the two switches S1 and S2, the capacitors C1 and C2 are connected in series with the dc source (batteries). The center point between the two capacitors is at mid-potential. The voltage across each capacitor is VDC / 2. The switches S1 and S2 switch on and off periodically to produce the ac voltage. A filter (Lf and Cf) is used to reduce high switching frequency components and to produce sinusoidal output from the inverter.

Single phase half bridge inverter Simplified diagrams of DC/DC converter topologies.

In order to maximize the performance of the string, in most charge regulators a maximum power point tracker (MPPT) controller is used. The MPPT applies heuristic algorithms to track the array voltage which results in maximum power, given a solar irradiance level. The efficiency of modern MPPTs is between 92-97%, getting a typical 20-45% power gain in winter and a 10-15% in summer. Actual gain can vary widely depending on temperature, battery state of charge, and other factors.The MPPT is often performed via a high frequency DC to DC converter. Its input is the output of the solar panels strings. It converts the DC input to high frequency AC, and then back to a different DC voltage and current in order to match the panel voltage to that of the batteries. MPPTs operate at very high (audio range) frequencies, usually in the 2080 kHz range. The advantage of high frequency circuits is that they can be designed with high efficiency and small volume transformers and other components. The design of high frequency circuits can be a very difficult task because of EMI/EMC considerations (e.g. problems with circuit parts that act as antennas, causing radio and TV interference). Noise isolation and suppression issues become very important [6], [4].Inverters convert DC to AC. In off-grid systems, stand alone

Single phase full bridge inverter The output of the inverter is connected to the load through a transformer. The full bridge inverter has a similar function, but the output voltage is higher than the half bridge inverter. In figure 4 we can also see the layout of a three phase stand alone inverter [3], [4].

Three phase inverter In grid-connected applications the energy is provided directly to the grid and the necessary parts are the PV modules and the inverters. This reduces the cost of the system and it also reduces the necessary maintenance, as the batteries are the most maintenance-demanding components. The inverters for grid connected applications may have different topology and operation than off-grid ones. They have to produce excellent quality sine wave output, follow the frequency and voltage of the grid and extract maximum power from the PV modules through the MPPT. The inverter input scans the IV curve of the string until the maximum power point is found. [2], [1] The grid inverter always monitors the grid and the output voltage and frequency must be controlled. The most common modulation is the PWM modulation and operates at a range of 2 to 20 KHz [1]. Grid connected inverters are classified as voltage source inverters (VSI) and current source inverters (CSI). However, in PV applications VSI inverters are used. The layout of the VSI topology is shown in Figure 5.

VSI inverter During the years, the inverter topologies and the technology of power electronics has improved. Until some years ago, the common practice was to use central inverters for most PV applications. The PV modules were divided into series connections (called strings), each generating a sufficiently high voltage to avoid further amplification. Then all the strings were connected in parallel through string diodes in order to reach high power levels. The use of central inverter has many drawbacks such as MPPT power losses, losses from differentiations between the modules and high voltage DC cables from the PV panels to the inverter. In the beginning, line commutated inverters using thyristors were applied, characterized by poor harmonic performance. Today, the most popular inverter topology is the string inverter. One or two strings of crystalline modules are connected to each inverter which has its own MPP tracker and the power losses are significantly lower [11]. The use of more than one MPP trackers in the power plant is necessary in the case of different module orientation and shading. This maximizes each strings I-V curve power output [10]. From tests

that have been performed on string inverters, the development through the years is obvious. According to [H. Haeberlin, Berner Fachhochshule], the inverter efficiency in 1988 was in the order of 85.5 90%, in the mid 90s was increased to 90 92% and nowadays it has reached 98% [12]. The most popular string inverter is the transformerless one, because the transformers that operated at grid frequencies are bulky, expensive and cause losses. Furthermore, the transformers impose limitations in the control of grid current by the inverter. Especially at low load, the reactive power for the magnetization of the transformer leads to a lower power factor [10]. Another important factor that affects the system design optimization is the maximum input voltage (Vmax-in) of the inverters as well as their input voltage (Vin) bandwidth. These two characteristics (Vmax-in and Vin) are getting wider and still rise, a fact that allows the designer to perform more efficient and flexible combinations in order to achieve the desired power. The Vmax-in of the string inverters kept rising from 600V upt o 900V in 2009, while the in 2010 inverters with Vmax-in=1000V allowing even bigger strings are already in the market. The higher the Vmaxin is, the less strings of more modules are used, so the losses are further decreased as less cables are used [11].The IGBTs and MOSFETs with high pulsing frequencies provide improved power quality in compliance with the regulations of the utility grid. The high frequency used has led to the use of high frequency transformers with lower weight. This fact reduced the total weight of the inverters significantly (up to 20%). The todays string inverters vary from 22 - 65 kg. The lower the weight is, the easier the installation and the lower the transportation costs are.According to the power categorization, the string inverters are now available in the range of 2 to 30 kWp. Until 2008, string inverters were not produced at more than the 5kWp. Single phase ones are used in PV stations of even 2MWp. However, a more recent trend is the development of the three phase string inverters, at almost the same power range. In 2010 the first 3-phase inverters became available in the market providing easier design and electrical connections , as well as a completely symmetric power output, an important factor for the utility grid operator.The multistring inverter is a development of the string inverter. A combination of strings are connected to separate DC/DC converters and then to a common DC/AC converter. This is beneficial in comparison to the central inverter because each string is controlled individually. This results to higher efficiency and flexibility of the system [11], [9].Central inverters are used in larger scale applications, offering Operation and Maintenance contracts for the plant owners. The operation availability of such inverters is warranted up to 99% throughout a complete year of operation.Until 2008 the power range of the central inverters was from 100kW but not more than 500kW. However, the Inverter manufacturers developed larger inverters mostly using scalable techniques up to 1,25MWp.The efficiency of Central Inverters has climbed from 92% since the 1990s to 98.8% in 2010. Their main advantage is their high reliability providing maximum operational life. Recently, the trend is to offer Central Station Inverters (CSI), which include the house, the transformer, the medium voltage switchgear, the monitoring system, the cooling concept and the wiring and they arrive on the installation preassembled, which minimizes all the required tasks and connections.Such inverters are used mostly in PV parks higher than 2MWp, however lower size installations are also common. 3. Power Electronics for WT applications There are two types of wind turbines (WT), the horizontal

axis and the vertical axis. They are both shown on Figure 6. However, the horizontal axis WT is by far the most popular design [4].

DC link voltage must be boosted to a level higher than the amplitude of the grid line voltage. The power flow of the grid side converter is controlled in order to keep the DC link voltage constant, while the control of the generator is set to suit the magnetization demand and the reference speed.The matrix inverters can efficiently convert the three phase electrical output of the WT to the requested electrical grid characteristics for a proper connection. They use an array of controlled bidirectional switches to convert AC power from one frequency to another. They produce a variable output voltage with unrestricted frequency. The privilege compared to other topologies is that the matrix converters do not have a dc link circuit and they do not use large energy storage elements. A figure of the matrix inverter is shown in Figure 7b where the switching devices, the input filter and the clamp circuit are presented

Horizontal axis WT

Back to back PWM - VSI converter

Vertical axis WT A large number of designs are available, ranging from 50W up to 7MW size. The number of blades can vary but the most commonly seen are with 2 or 3 blades. There are three types of wind power systems, the stand alone, the hybrid and the grid connected.The stand alone ones are mostly used for household applications and require batteries in order to store the produced energy and an inverter to convert to AC current. This system requires the use of a charge regulator which will feed the power from the wind generator to the battery bank in a controlled manner. The most common turbine which is used in such applications is the permanent magnet generator and the charging control is made through controlled rectifiers. The charge regulator should be programmed to limit the current into the batteries, to reduce current when the batteries are charged and to maintain a trickle charge during full of charge periods [1], [4]. The hybrid systems could also include other renewable sources such as PV systems or even a diesel generator and feed the energy to a household or even to the grid.The grid connected WT are connected to the utility grid either directly or through power electronics, feeding the produced energy to the grid. On this type of WT all manufacturers are trying to increase the size and efficiency of the machines. Many studies have been made on the speed control part and on ways to reduce the cost of the unit. There are several types of inverters which are used on wind turbine installations, such as PWM VSI converters and matrix converters. However the matrix converter is not widely used. The back to back PWM VSI is a bi-directional power converter consisting of two PWM VSI inverters. The topology of this inverter is shown in Figure 7a.To achieve full control of the grid current, the

Matrix converter MOSFETs for low power and IGBTs for higher power enable the implementation of bidirectional switches, which make the inverter topology very attractive for AC power handling.The input filter minimizes the high frequency components in the input currents and reduces the disturbances of input power. The input filter can be designed with a combination of inductors and capacitors with parallel damping resistors where on the other hand the clamp circuit provides overvoltage protection and uses fast recovery diodes. The general operation of the inverter is to convert the AC current of the WT to the AC current that the utility grid demands. One example of this taken from L.H.Hansen is the conversion of 300 Hz current coming from the WT to 60Hz which is the grid frequency for American utility. A 7200 Hz switching frequency is applied on the switches and the result of the conversion is shown on Figure 8. There is a duty cycle factor that can be adjusted to regulate the ratio of output to input voltage, up to a maximum value. Finally, the output is passed through a filter to eliminate high frequency harmonics [8].

which is particularly useful in stall controlled WT [13].When the generator is connected to the grid a contactor bypasses the soft starter to reduce losses. This is also shown in figure 9a (Kbyp). It is possible to utilize the controller in normal operation in order to reduce the static voltage and resulting to reduce magnetizing losses when operating under light wind, at the expense of high harmonic distortion [7].A recent trend in WT technology is the use of multi-pole low speed generators which permit the direct coupling of the turbine rotor to the electrical generator. This eliminates the gearbox, the interconnection axes and the coupling and results to price and weight reduction and improved reliability [13].

Matrix converter steady state simulations The driving circuit of a typical IGBT is the same as MOSFET, and the linkage capacitors between an IGBTs terminals are rather low. In PWM type rectifiers, when the switching frequency increases, the power loss becomes high during the deactivation of the switching element and the commutation diode. This case limits the usage of an IGBT with 50 kHz as the switching element. Thus, in high frequency resonance-type inverters, it can be practically used at the frequency of 250 kHz. For 50 kHz, the power loss during conduction of an IGBT is approximately 6 watts where for 250 kHz it is approximately 0.8 watts.Apart from the matrix converters there are also other three suggested topologies, namely the tandem converter, the multilevel converter and the resonant converter (NCC). The advantage of the matrix converter is that it consists only of active components on the power part where the others consist of passive components too. The matrix converter can omit the transformer without requiring high voltage ratings for the components. However, on the harmonic performance the best topology is the multilevel converter which shows the best spectra on both the grid and generator side. Finally, the NCC topology is the most efficient followed by the multilevel and the tandem converter. Further information can be found on [7].Apart from the above topologies, what really makes the difference between the manufacturers is the control concept. Constant research and development is being performed on this field in order to develop better modulation concepts and to eliminate harmonics, so as to minimize the cost for the filters.A common application of the static converters is the switching to the grid of WT equipped with induction generators (soft starting). Direct connection of the WT to the grid causes high inrush currents which are undesirable especially for weak grids, also severe torque pulsations and damage to the gearbox. For this reason the soft starter is used which regulates the applied stator voltages.The commutating devices are two anti-parallel thyristors per phase. The relationship between the firing angle () and the resulting amplification of the soft starter is non- linear and depends additionally on the power factor of the connected element. In the case of a resistive load, may vary between 0 (full on) and 90 (full off) degrees, in the case of a purely inductive load between 90, (full on) and 180 (full off) degrees. For any power factor between 0 and 90 degrees, will be somewhere between the limits sketched in Figure 9b.Usually, the turbine accelerates under pitch-control to the synchronous speed through the wind power alone and only then is it switched onto the grid. AC controllers have been also reported for the connection to the grid at zero speed and subsequent fast acceleration to the operating speed,

Soft starter

Control characteristic for a full controlled soft starter. 4. Conclusion In this paper the main trends of the power electronics used in PV and WT applications are presented. Due to the high demand for renewable energy sources applications, there is a continuing research for improving the total efficiency of these applications and by improving each electronic part included. As far as the PV systems are concerned the inverters efficiency is continuously improving and ways to minimize the weight of the devices are tested so as to decrease transportation costs and ease the installation. Moreover, the power and voltage range of the string and central inverters is increased, so that more efficient and cheaper PV installations can be realized using a relatively low number of inverters. The power electronics for WT systems are subject to extensive R&D, especially about more efficient control concepts and even more efficient converters.

I. PAGE LAYOUT to use this document as a template and simply type your text into it. A. Page Layout Your paper must use a page size corresponding to A4 which is 210mm (8.27") wide and 297mm (11.69") long. The margins must be set as follows: Top = 19mm (0.75") Bottom = 43mm (1.69") Left = Right = 14.32mm (0.56") Your paper must be in two column format with a space of 4.22mm (0.17") between columns. II. PAGE STYLE All paragraphs must be indented. All paragraphs must be justified, i.e. both left-justified and right-justified. A. Text Font of Entire Document The entire document should be in Times New Roman or Times font. Type 3 fonts must not be used. Other font types may be used if needed for special purposes. Recommended font sizes are shown in Table 1.

Managing Director), any academic title (e.g. Dr.) or any membership of any professional organization (e.g. Senior Member IEEE). To avoid confusion, the family name must be written as the last part of each author name (e.g. John A.K. Smith). Each affiliation must include, at the very least, the name of the company and the name of the country where the author is based (e.g. Causal Productions Pty Ltd, Australia). Email address is compulsory for the corresponding author. C. Section Headings No more than 3 levels of headings should be used. All headings must be in 10pt font. Every word in a heading must be capitalized except for short minor words as listed in Section III-B. 1) Level-1 Heading: A level-1 heading must be in Small Caps, centered and numbered using uppercase Roman numerals. For example, see heading III. Page Style of this document. The two level-1 headings which must not be numbered are Acknowledgment and References. 2) Level-2 Heading: A level-2 heading must be in Italic, left-justified and numbered using an uppercase alphabetic letter followed by a period. For example, see heading C. Section Headings above.

3) Level-3 Heading: A level-3 heading must be indented, in Italic and numbered with an Arabic numeral followed by a right parenthesis. The level-3 heading must end with a colon. B. Title and Author Details The body of the level-3 section immediately follows the levelTitle must be in 24 pt Regular font. Author name must be 3 heading in the same paragraph. For example, this paragraph in 11 pt Regular font. Author affiliation must be in 10 pt Italic. begins with a level-3 heading. Email address must be in 9 pt Courier Regular font. D. Figures and Tables Figures and tables must be centered in the column. Large TABLE I figures and tables may span across both columns. Any table FONT SIZES FOR PAPERS or figure that takes up more than 1 column width must be Font Appearance (in Time New Roman or Times) positioned either at the top or at the bottom of the page. Size Regular Bold Italic Graphics may be full color. All colors will be retained on 8 table caption (in reference item the CDROM. Graphics must not use stipple fill patterns Small Caps), (partial) because they may not be reproduced properly. Please use figure caption, only SOLID FILL colors which contrast well both on screen reference item and on a black-and-white hardcopy, as shown in Fig. 1. 9 author email address abstract abstract heading
10 (in Courier), cell in a table level-1 heading (in Small Caps), paragraph author name Title body (also in Bold) level-2 heading, level-3 heading, author affiliation

11 24

All title and author details must be in single-column format and must be centered. Every word in a title must be capitalized except for short minor words such as a, an, and, as, at, by, for, from, if, in, into, on, or, of, the, to, with. Author details must not show any professional title (e.g.
Fig. 1 A sample line graph using colors which contrast well both on screen and on a black-and-white hardcopy

Fig. 2 shows an example of a low-resolution image which would not be acceptable, whereas Fig. 3 shows an example of an image with adequate resolution. Check that the resolution is adequate to reveal the important detail in the figure. Please check all figures in your paper both on screen and on a black-and-white hardcopy. When you check your paper on a black-and-white hardcopy, please ensure that: the colors used in each figure contrast well, the image used in each figure is clear, all text labels in each figure are legible. E. Figure Captions Figures must be numbered using Arabic numerals. Figure captions must be in 8 pt Regular font. Captions of a single line (e.g. Fig. 2) must be centered whereas multi-line captions must be justified (e.g. Fig. 1). Captions with figure numbers must be placed after their associated figures, as shown in Fig. 1.

Tables must be numbered using uppercase Roman numerals. Table captions must be centred and in 8 pt Regular font with Small Caps. Every word in a table caption must be capitalized except for short minor words as listed in Section III-B. Captions with table numbers must be placed before their associated tables, as shown in Table 1. G. Page Numbers, Headers and Footers Page numbers, headers and footers must not be used. H. Links and Bookmarks All hypertext links and section bookmarks will be removed from papers during the processing of papers for publication. If you need to refer to an Internet email address or URL in your paper, you must type out the address or URL fully in Regular font.

Fig. 2 Example of an unacceptable low-resolution image

Fig. 3 Example of an image with acceptable resolution

F. Table Captions

I. References The heading of the References section must not be numbered. All reference items must be in 8 pt font. Please use Regular and Italic styles to distinguish different fields as shown in the References section. Number the reference items consecutively in square brackets (e.g. [1]). When referring to a reference item, please simply use the reference number, as in [2]. Do not use Ref. [3] or Reference [3] except at the beginning of a sentence, e.g. Reference [3] shows . Multiple references are each numbered with separate brackets (e.g. [2], [3], [4] [6]). Examples of reference items of different categories shown in the References section include: example of a book in [1] example of a book in a series in [2] example of a journal article in [3] example of a conference paper in [4] example of a patent in [5] example of a website in [6] example of a web page in [7] example of a databook as a manual in [8] example of a datasheet in [9] example of a masters thesis in [10] example of a technical report in [11] example of a standard in [12] III. CONCLUSIONS The version of this template is V2. Most of the formatting instructions in this document have been compiled by Causal Productions from the IEEE LaTeX style files. Causal Productions offers both A4 templates and US Letter templates for LaTeX and Microsoft Word. The LaTeX templates depend on the official IEEEtran.cls and IEEEtran.bst files, whereas the Microsoft Word templates are self-contained.

Causal Productions has used its best efforts to ensure that the templates have the same appearance. ACKNOWLEDGMENT The heading of the Acknowledgment section and the References section must not be numbered. Causal Productions wishes to acknowledge Michael Shell and other contributors for developing and maintaining the IEEE LaTeX style files which have been used in the preparation of this template. To see the list of contributors, please refer to the top of file IEEETran.cls in the IEEE LaTeX distribution. REFERENCES
[1] [2] S. M. Metev and V. P. Veiko, Laser Assisted Microtechnology, 2nd ed., R. M. Osgood, Jr., Ed. Berlin, Germany: Springer-Verlag, 1998. J. Breckling, Ed., The Analysis of Directional Time Series: Applications to Wind Speed and Direction, ser. Lecture Notes in Statistics. Berlin, Germany: Springer, 1989, vol. 61. S. Zhang, C. Zhu, J. K. O. Sin, and P. K. T. Mok, A novel ultrathin elevated channel low-temperature poly-Si TFT, IEEE Electron Device Lett., vol. 20, pp. 569571, Nov. 1999. M. Wegmuller, J. P. von der Weid, P. Oberson, and N. Gisin, High resolution fiber distributed measurements with coherent OFDR, in Proc. ECOC00, 2000, paper 11.3.4, p. 109. R. E. Sorace, V. S. Reinhardt, and S. A. Va ughn, High-speed digitalto-RF converter, U.S. Patent 5 668 842, Sept. 16, 1997. (2002) The IEEE website. [Online]. Available: http://www.ieee.org/ M. Shell. (2002) IEEEtran homepage on CTAN. [Online]. Available: http://www.ctan.org/texarchive/macros/latex/contrib/supported/IEEEtran/ FLEXChip Signal Processor (MC68175/D), Motorola, 1996. PDCA12-70 data sheet, Opto Speed SA, Mezzovico, Switzerland. A. Karnik, Performance of TCP congestion control with rate feedback: TCP/ABR and rate adaptive TCP/IP, M. Eng. thesis, Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore, India, Jan. 1999. J. Padhye, V. Firoiu, and D. Towsley, A stochastic model of TCP Reno congestion avoidance and control, Univ. of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA, CMPSCI Tech. Rep. 99-02, 1999. Wireless LAN Medium Access Control (MAC) and Physical Layer (PHY) Specification, IEEE Std. 802.11, 1997.

[3]

[4]

[5] [6] [7]

[8] [9] [10]

[11]

[12]