You are on page 1of 3

8/8/13

E-tendering: a way forward | Builder & Engineer

We use cookies on this site to enhance your user experience


By clicking any link on this page you are giving your consent for us to set cookies.

Yes, I agree

No, I want to find out more

E-tendering: a way forward


Managing the entire contract process electronically has its attractions, but will the industry adopt it enthusiastically Since the arrival of broadband and the greater security of firewalls e-tendering for contracts has grown dramatically. In Hong Kong, for example, virtually every public sector contract is put out to e-tender. In the UK it is again the public sector which is pushing the boundaries - e-tendering is the Olympic Delivery Authoritys preferred method for procurement - but surprisingly the private sector has been slow to take advantage of the idea. Bodies like RICS have attempted to fill the gap: RICS eTendering is a web tendering service offered on a pay-per-tender basis to the construction industry. It allows companies to run tenders through a secure website. It offers a simple, secure, standard, efficient and cost effective way to manage tenders online. The advantages of e-tendering are obvious. Documentation is distributed and returned via a secure webbased system. This avoids the need for collating paperwork and also, important for construction, creates an automatic audit trail. During the tender period, updates and queries and changes are exchanged through the same system. Etendering can be used for all values of tenders, although primarily used for higher value contracts at present. However, it does appear that the UK construction industry is unwilling to listen. Three-quarters of UK firms still post or email tenders to their clients, according to a BCIS e-tendering survey report released last month. This showed the percentage of tender documents sent solely in electronic format has almost doubled since 2006, increasing from 8% two years ago to 15%. However, the percentage of electronic documents being delivered by physical means, such as on a disk, increased from 2% to 46% while the percentage sent by email decreased from 64% to 46%. The greatest barriers to switching to a web-based system seems to be the perceived costs associated with web based e-tendering and the assumption that clients are not interested. Yet in reality e-tendering systems are quite simple. The client uploads the notice or invitation to tender onto the system. Notification is sent out, and the suppliers download the information and complete their responses. The client can access the tenders only after the deadline has passed. All information is held in a central database. This is easily searchable and can be fully audited, with all activities recorded. There are a number of systems available, but they all will offer: some form of messaging function for informing tenderers of changes document management to keep track of the information an audit trail a user interface. Data is encrypted and users are authenticated by means such as digital signatures, electronic certificates or smartcards. Supporters of e-tendering also point out the cost saving benefits. As long ago as 2005 Construction IT firm BuildOnline was reporting that, by using its online tendering system, Laing Homes saved over 200,000 a year in running tender costs. Yet the cost saving may be something of a red herring. It is the efficiency savings which make e-tendering an attractive proposition. In its guide to e-tendering Constructing Excellence points out the following benefits: information supplied to tenderers is consistent; tenders are always legible; automatic tallying prevents arithmetical errors; there are reliable processes for distributing changes during the tender process; checks highlight incomplete bids; faster distribution of information;

www.builderandengineer.co.uk/feature/e-tendering-way-forward

1/3

8/8/13
improved security;

E-tendering: a way forward | Builder & Engineer

tenderers who are based further away are not disadvantaged; there are improved communication and audit trails; better management information is provided; there is no need for paper copies; the standardised electronic format makes the comparison of bids more straightforward; Any drawbacks? Other than the fact that the systems must be failsafe, as much of the information they handle is confidential the simple answer is no.

Contract News
Vinci w ins 18.2m Liverpool w ork Catterick Garrison set for 25m revamp 9m Supertram contract up for grabs Beard w ins 4.2m school contract BAM w ins UTC Cambridge contract

City News
Charge w ipes out most of Morgan Sindall's profits ERH sees turnover rise by over 50% London office construction hits five year high Turner & Tow nsend sees 27% UK profits rise Speedy sees 2.6% UK revenue drop

More News
Midas Group to build multi-million pound Next store National Grid starts second phase of 30m pow er line project Catterick Garrison set for 25m revamp House prices 'break 200k barrier' NHBC looks at basements again

Your News
If you've got a story that would be of interest to Builder & Engineer readers, send us an email

Editors Choice
2013-07-31 12:40 2013-07-31 12:24 2013-07-30 16:42 2013-07-17 16:56

Banking our green and pleasant land


There has been much talk recently about the practise of land banking, with key political figures criticising its practice.

The money should follow the market


As the GDP output figures show a rise in the construction sector of 0.9%, Jonathan Pochin, managing director of Pochin Construction, warns that other changes, particularly in financing, are needed before we can see a real return to growth.

Hats 'make a harder sell'


The engineering industry needs to tone down its use of images of men in hard hats if it is to inspire more young people to forge a career in the industry, an organisation that awards MBS scholarships to engineering students is claiming.

Not as bad as it could be


The construction industry has now endured five long years of an economic downturn, and every month new figures come along which suggest we are still not out of the woods yet. Last weeks figures from the ONS, showing that UK construction output stayed flat in May, were no exception.

2013-07-17 15:18

2013-07-17 14:55

2013-07-04 17:13

2013-07-03 15:27

Return to boom, or back to normal?


The latest construction output figures have left Michael Conroy Harris, construction expert at law firm Eversheds, thinking that perhaps what we are seeing is the UK market stabilising at its real size. And that, he says, may be no bad thing

Slowly back to growth


With the latest industrial strategy for construction unveiled earlier this month, Andrew Poyner, construction and engineering lawyer at Watson Burton, looks at the launch of the governments strategy document and discusses what it means for the industry

Johnson's approval 'not the end for Earls Court'


Opponents of a plan to knock down the Earls Court exhibition centre in west London and replace it with an urban village of over 7,500 homes say the battle to stop the plan is far from over even if London mayor Boris Johnson has now backed the plan.

Infrastructure spend broadly welcomed


Confirmation of 42.6bn to fund HS2, a further 9bn on other Network Rail upgrades and the biggest road investment since the 1970s have all been unveiled as part of the governments plans for major infrastructure investment in the Spending Review.

www.builderandengineer.co.uk/feature/e-tendering-way-forward

2/3

8/8/13

E-tendering: a way forward | Builder & Engineer

Free E-newsletter Sign-Up


Sign up for our free e-newsletter Name: Company: Job : Email address: *

Looking for a company or service?


Company Name

Category <Any>

Apply

www.builderandengineer.co.uk/feature/e-tendering-way-forward

3/3

You might also like