ak-taweel@yahoo.

com

.
.
.
:
.
.
:
.
.
The Ability of Applying Total Quality Management in Mosul University
A Study of Selected Group in Different Colleges
Dr. Akram A. AL-Taweel
Assistant Professor
Dept. of Industrial management

Faris Y. AL-Korani
Assistant Lecturer
Technical Institution

ABSTRACT
The concept of total quality management has attracted the attention of different
managing levels in general; such as organizations of higher education that is, because of the
importance of quality which are among competitive weapons, through which the
organization insures a bigger marketing share.

________________________________

/ /

Through a theoretical review and an operational fulfillment in our University Colleges

and specifically Mosul University Colleges at present, we indicated the theoretical gap in
TQM philosophy & the application on the organizations of higher education.
Here, the project aims at presenting theoretical features for the Colleges management,
under discussion, about the concept and the prerequisites, in addition to providing the basic
requirements for the total quality management of application to the Colleges, under
discussion.
Generally, the project tries to answer the following questions:
1. Do the Colleges managements, under discussion, have any idea on the concept of
total quality management and their aims?
2. Are there any basic requirements about the ability of applying Total Quality
Management Requirements in the Colleges, under discussion?
The project has reached a number of conclusions, the most important was:
In Colleges environment, under discussion, the availability of basic requirements for
adopting the Total Quality Management, so it is suitable for fulfillment from the peoples
point of view of the, under discussion. Depending on these conclusions, a number of
recommendations were presented.

...

:
-

.
:
.
.

:
.
.
.
.
:
)
(
:
.
.
.
.

.
.

.
.
.

.
.
-

(*)

:
:

*
-

.
.
.
:

*
-

.
.

*
.
.

:
-

(*)

...

:
"

"

.
.

.
."

"

.
"

."
)

.
(
.

"

."

.
"
"(

.
.
"

."

"

(Seymour, 1993,244-266)
."

21

"

(Rieley,1992)

.
.

(Evangelista.,1995)

"

27

.
.
"

(Freed,et.al,1997,107-119)
."
:

...

(Lewis and Smith,1997,259-260)

."

"

.
-

.
(Asher,1996,18)
(Helge,1997,19)
(Robert,1998,766)
(

)
)

.
(

)
(

.
BQA

.(www.haho.com/book)

BSI

.(www.quality.com/book) .

Herrera

. (stu.htm/soulwww.tamuce.edu/new)
(
)

(
.

...

.
.
.

(Evans,1997,45)
(Arnold, 1998, 417)
;

.
(
(
(
.

)
(

(
.
-

Heizer and )

(Render, 1996, 98
(Nahmias,1997,700)

.
(Goetsch and David,1997,13-17) (Russel and Taylor, 1995, 93):
(Thomas and Lawrence, 2004, 395)
(Haksever, et al, 2000, 27)
(www.unaipudlishring.com) (www.ISO/report.com)
;

.
.
(Roth and Jackson, 1995, 399)

(Krajewki and

...

Ritzman,1999, 321)

.
(www.Iejs.com)
(Hedhtts, 2000, 77)

(Plan ,Do, Check, Action)

(Chaffen and

P.D.C.A

.
Sherr,1992, 41-52)

(Lewis and Smith,1997, 259-260)

.
.

%25

.(www.Org/report.net)
(Lawrence and Thomas,2004, 399)
(Rieley,1992,191-203)

.(

.
.
(Wern and Voich,1994, 471)
(www.darwael/indix/com)

.
.

.
(

.
(

)
)

.
(

...

.
.
(
(

)
)

(Hazzard, 1993, 61-75)

.
(

(Freed, et al ,1999,

1047-119)

.
(Samuel, et.al,1995,1999)

(/report.comwww.ISO)
)

.
(

(Lewis and Smith ,1997, 18-19)

.
(

(Freed, et

.
al,1997, 107)

.
.
(

(Goetsch and

.
Davis,1997,16)
(Ross, 1995, 122)

...

.
(www.uhaipablishing.com)
)

(
.

(Theomas and Laurence, 2004,

397)

(
(

)
)

:
.

(*)

(
-

1963

1963

1964

1966

1968

1975

1976

1983

1983

1992

1993

(*)

...

1999

2002

(*)

.
.

.
(
(
) (
(Seymour,1991) (
(Lewis and Smith, 1997)

)
%

)
) (

(Hazzard,1993)

(Chaffee and Sherr, 1992)

.
/ /

(*)

%
62.5

85.7

66.7

12

83.4

10

12

77.8

92.3

12

13

100

10

10

100

100

100

100

100

100

87.3

89

102

82.1%

.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.

14.6%
57.3%

%
57.3

%
51

28.1

%
25

14.6

13

...

88.8

79

11.2

10

11.2%

88.8%

15.7

14

67.4

60

16.9

83.1%

40-31

30-21

%
5.61

15

20-11

%
5

10-1

47.18

42

10

20.21

%
33

10.1

89.9%

.
-

( X10-X1)

%94.4

0.7 4.5 (X1)

.
%85.4
%87.6

0.77

4.29 (X3)

4.0 (X2)

0.8

.
%85.5

4.26 (X5)

0.85

%82

0.82 4.22 (X6)

%82
0.84

4.04 (X7)
80.7

(Chaffee and

0.87 4.24 (X8)

Sherr,1992,41-52)

...

%84.9

0.75

4.27 (X9)

.
.(X17-X11)

%73

0.89 4.02 (X11)

(Rieley,1997,191-203)

%70.1

0.89

3.92 (X12)

%81.8

.
.

0.79 4.12 (X`13)

(
.

)
)
(

)
%55

3.48 (X14)
%58.4

.
1.06

0.59

3.57 (X15)

%53.9

(
.

0.99 3.42 (X16)

)
.

%59.5

.
(

)
.

.(X23-X18)

%86.5

0.78 4.19 (X18)

(
.

%88.7

0.77 4.25 (X19)

%82

0.79 4.15 (X20)

)
%80.9

%66.3

.
.1.08 3.76 (X22)

0.90 4.02 (X21)

.(

...

)
.

%68.6
1.08 3.76 (X23)
(Lewis and Smith , 1997,256-

.
260)

.
X28-)

.(X24

%79.9

3.76 (X24)

1.08

)
.

%86.5

.
0.69

3.98 (X25)
(Hazzard,1993,61-75)

67.3%

0.99

3.67 (X26)

%74.1
.

68.5%

.
0.98 3.79 (X28)
(

.0.88 3.81 (X27)

)

.
.

.
.(X34-X29)

%82
0.80 4.01 (X29)
(Lewis and Smith , 1997,259-260)

.
.

%74.1

(X30)
-

0.86 3.91

%65.1

0.98 3.65 (X31)

(Freed, et-al, 1997,107-119)

%79.7

%90.9

91%

.
.

0.67

4.34 (X33)

0.74 4.17 (X34)

0.85

3.89 (X32)

...

.
.(X41-X35)

%84.2

0.87 4.06 (X35)

(Chaffee and Sherr,1992 ,41-52)

%88.8

(X36) .
%75.3
.

0.88 3.97 (X37)

0.82

4.20

73

(X38)
%53.9

%66.2

1.07

0.87 3.86

3.47 (X39)

1.11 3.68 (X40)

%58.4

.
.

1.01 3.61 (X41)

:
.
.
.
.
.
:

)
.(
.
-

.
-

...

.
-

.
:

.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
:

.
.

.
:

.
.

"

"

.
"

"
.
"
.

.
"

:
-

...

"

.
"

.
.
.
.
.

2000 -2001
.
.
.
.
.

.
)

(
"

"

.
.

)
.

"

"

.
.

TQM
i
.
"

"

.
.
.

.
.
.

.
.
:
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
:

.
.

1.
2.
3.
4.

5.
6.
7.
8.
9.

10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.

Arnold , J.R Introduction To Materials Management ,3rd.ed , Prentice Hall

International , Inc ,New Yeresy 1998.
Asher , M. ,Managing Quality In The Service Secov, Ltd , St , Iven Pic England , 1996.
Chaffee, E and Sheer, A, Quality Transforming Postse Condary Education , Cupa
Journal , Vol. 43 , No21 , 1992 .
Evangelists, A, The Impact of The Quality Movement In Public Education on The
Improvement of Curriculum and Instruction Through Total Quality Management
Practices, Ph.D. , Dissertation , Ston , Hall University , U.S.A, 1995.
Evans, J.R., Production / Operation Management Quality Performance And Value, 5th
ed , West Publinhing Co , New York, 1997 .
Freed, J and Others, Implementing The Quality Principles In Higher Education,
Higher Education , Vol.38 , No.2 , 1997 .
Goetsch , D . L. and D avid, S. B, Introduction To Quality Management For Production
Processing and Services, 2th-Ed., Prentice Hill, Inc, U.S.A, 1997.
Haksever, C., Service Management and Operation, 4th. Ed , Prentice-Hall, New Gersey,
2000.
Hazzard ,T. , The Strengths and Weaknesses Of Total Quality Management In Higher
Education, direction For Institutional Research, No71, TQM In Higher Education,Vol
18 , No31 , 1993.
Hedhtts.R , Quality Lessons From Americans Balding Winners , Business Horizon,
vol 36 ,No3 , May Jane , usa , www.Jhpin . com , 2000 .
Heizer , J, and Render . B, Production and Operations Management , Strategic and
Tactical Decisions , 4th .Ed , Prentic-Hill , Inc . , New Jersey, 1996 .
Heizer ,J, and Taylor,Operation Management, 3th.Ed, Prentice-Hall , Inc , U.S.A,2000 .
Herrera , S.J , Total Quality Management ? WWW.tamuce. edu /new stu.htm / soul
krajewskigl.,and Ritzman, L., Operation Management :Strategy and Analysis, 4Th.Ed ,
Addison- wesely Publihing , USA, 1999.
Lawrence and Thomas, Evaluating The Deming Management Model of Total Quality
in Service Journal Decision Sciences, Vol 35, No3 , USA, 2004
Lewis, G,and Smith, H, Why Quality Improvement, In Higher Education ,
International Journal , Vol 1 , 1997.

...

17. Nahmias , S., Production and Operations Analysis, 3 rd . Ed , Mc Graw- Hill Co. ,
USA, 1997.
18. Rieley, J. , Total Quality Management In Higher EducationHigher Education, vol 16
,No2 , 1997
19. Roth, A., and Jackan , W. , Strategic Determinants Of Service Quality and Performance
Evidence From The Banking Industry , Management Science , Vol 41, 1995.
20. Russell, R.S and Taylor , B.W, Production and Operation Management , Prentic Hall
, USA ,1995.
21. Samuel , C.P and Edward, The Strategic Management Process, 3rd.ed, McGraw Hill,
Inc, USA, 1995
22. Seymour, Donuel,T, and Collot ,Casey,Total Quality Management in Higher Education
Critical Assessment Research Technical ,U.S.A. , 1991
23. Thomas , J.D and Lawrence, D-F, Evaluating The Deming Management Model Of
Total Quality In Service , Journal Decision Sciences , Vol 35, No3 , USA, 2004
24. Wern , D, and Voich , D.J, Management Process Structure and Behavior , 3rd.Ed New
York , 1994.
25. (www. haho . com/ book)
26. (www. quality . com/ book)
27. (www. Iso/report. com)
28. (www. Iejs . com)
29. (www. Uhaipudlisring . com)
30. (www. Darwael/indix /com)
31. (www. uhaipablihing .com)