Professional Documents
Culture Documents
I.
Link between test construct, test design, test performance Key terms used to define construct of language Historical overview of different constructs/models of language ability
II. III.
IV.
V.
Draw inferences
Teachers
Researchers
Local decisions
Language ability
Language proficiency Comprehension vs. Production
Historical background: During and post war period (1940s-1960s) necessitated scientific observable and rapid language teaching and testing methods Influence of structural linguistics (Fries, Lado), behavioural psychology (Skinner, Pavlov)
Language behavior: set of habits, observable, difference between L1 and L2 habits (error analysis) No role of mind/ innate linguistic mechanisms/ social interactions
1960s
onwards
Chomskian
revolution: input underdetermines output Language Acquisition Device (LAD): generative linguistics ability: competence vs. performance Emphasis of abstract mental rules of grammar/structure/syntax
Language
Ollers
model (1979)
Language
ability: holistic/unitary model: language is one component need not be broken down into components
Langauge ability: Communicative language competence language used in real life situations
Model by Canale and Swain (1980, built on model of Dell Hymes 1972): sociolinguistic + linguistic Model by Bachman and Palmer (1996) (Target Language Use(TLU)) (added and emphasized strategic competence as part of general cognitive ability)
1960s
onwards Success of Canadian Immersion programmes and documented research findings - L1 can support L2 learning
ability: BICS vs. CALP
Language
Cummins
plea: let BICS develop in a contextualized manner (5-7 years) and then CALP will grow; access CALP through L1 and then use it in L2
A.
B.
C.
D.
E.
MCQ items (contextualized and calls for knowledge application) Dictation/ cloze tests MCQ items (word list translation etcdecontextualized, calls for knowledge reproduction) Open ended responses (reply to a mail/ oral prompt) Use criterion based format of testing
Test item description
1. 2.
3. 4. 5. 6.
Performance assessment Psychometric approach: discrete point(standardized tests/ summative tests) Formative assessment Behaviorist approach Social constructivist approach Ollers model
b.
c. d.
Spelling -decontextualized
6. Instructional changes (teachers) 5. Test validation (test designers) 4. Interpretation and decision making (test takers)
3. Test performance
2. Test specifications and design 1. Test construct
Lado
Alan
(1961)
Andrew
(1997)
Cohen
Messik
(1989) (2000)
Bachman
2010)
McNamara Shohamy
Palmer
(1996, 2010)
(2001)
1) 2)
3)
4) 5) 6) 7)
8)
Discrete point testing (contextualized) (194050) Integrative testing (1970s) Second language performance assessment (1980s) Specific purpose language assessment [occupational English tests] (1980s) Bilingual assessment (1970s) Computer based/ adaptive assessment (1970s) Alternative assessments (1910) Democratic assessments/ Critical language assessment (2000)
Phase
One: Initiated in 1963 as a pencil paper test- present up to 1998 Two: Computer based and adaptive test (1998 to 2004) continued to be mostly discrete point Three: Most recent form: internet based test (2005) not adaptive, no discrete point questions ( a set of reading texts, written response of a audio input, 6 listening and speaking tasks)
Phase
Phase