You are on page 1of 4

PFI Standard ES-7 (Reaffirmed January 2000)

MINIMUM LENGTH AND SPACING FOR WELDED NOZZLES

COPYRIGHT 2003; Pipe Fabrication Institute

--`,`````,,```,````````````,,-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---

Prepared by Pipe Fabrication Institute Engineering Committee

All PFI Standards are advisory only. There is no agreement to adhere to any PFI Standard and their use by anyone is entirely voluntary.

Copyright by

PIPE FABRICATION INSTITUTE


Dedicoted
to

Technicnl Advnncements ond Stnndnrdizntion in the Pipe Fnbricniion Industry Since I913

USA PME 323


61 I Pennsylvnnin Avenue SE

CANADA
6SS.3ZId ave, suire 201
Lachine, Quebec HBT3G6
WEB S I T E

Wnshington. DC 20003
Iiitp://,c?~c.pfi-insiiiuie. org

Document provided by IHS Licensee=Aramco HQ/9980755100, User=, 03/06/2003 02:28:11 MST Questions or comments about this message: please call the Document Policy Management Group at 1-800-451-1584.

S T D - P P I ES-'I-ENGL

71bLi5Li4 00005b8 588 D


PFI Standard ES-7 (Reaffirmed January 2000)

MINIMUM LENGTH AND SPACING FOR WELDED NOZZLES


METRIC CONVERSIONS The conversion of quantities between systems of units involves a determination of the number of significant digits to be retained. All conversions depend upon the intended precision of the original and are rounded to the appropriate accuracy. Pipe sizes together with applicable wall thicknesses are not shown with metric equivalents. The SI (metric) values where included with the customary U. S. values in this Standard are the rounded equivalents of the U. S. values and are for reference only. Metric units were derived utilizing the following conversion factor: Conversion inches to millimeter Factor 25.4
5.2 All nozzle welds should be checked for compliance with the applicable Code requirements.

1. Scope
I

,
I

1.1 This Standard covers the minimum recommended length, distance from open end on run, and spacing dimensions of adjacent welded nozzles.

2. Nozzles without Saddles or Reinforcement


2.1 Dimensions recommended for nozzles without

5.3 It is preferred that multiple branch openings of in-line nozzles be spaced so that their reinforcement zones do not overlap. If closer spacing is necessary, the reinforcement requirements of the applicable construction Code shall be met.
5.4 Some configurations of integrally reinforced

saddles or reinforcements are as shown in Fig. 1 and Table 1.

3. Nozzles with Reinforcing Saddles or Rings


3.1 Dimensions recommended for nozzles with saddles or rings are as shown in Fig. 2 and Table 2.
--`,`````,,```,````````````,,-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---

nozzles in combination with certain header sizes may present a problem in the radiographic examination of the attachment weld due to inability to meet the geometric unsharpness requirements of the construction Code.

4. Nozzles - Integrally Reinforced


4.1 Dimensions recommended for integrally reinforced nozzles are as shown in Fig. 3 and Table 3. These dimensions do not apply to integrally reinforced insert butt weld nozzles.

5.5 Where attachments such as flanges, fittings, valves and pipe insulation are involved, minimum dimensions tabulated may have to be increased to allow for required clearances.
5.6 In special cases, it may be possible to reduce the dimensions given in the tabulation. Such design should then be submitted to the fabricator for individual consideration, as close spacing may involve additional shop operations to prevent, or correct distortion. 5.7 Integrally reinforced nozzles are considered to be the commercially available types.

5. Design Considerations
5.1 Certain materials and combinations of nozzle and header pipe size and wall thickness together with multiple branch openings welded to a header may result in distortion of the header pipe. The elimination or reduction of such distortion is beyond the scope of this Standard.

5.8 In cases of different nozzle diameters, dimension "C", (Fig. & Tables 1 thni 3) should be determined on the basis of the larger of the two adjacent nozzles.

2
COPYRIGHT 2003; Pipe Fabrication Institute Document provided by IHS Licensee=Aramco HQ/9980755100, User=, 03/06/2003 02:28:11 MST Questions or comments about this message: please call the Document Policy Management Group at 1-800-451-1584.

S T D - P F I ES-7-ENGL

2000

7Lb4544 O0005b7 414


PFI Standard ES-7 (Reaffirmed January 2000)

MINIMUM RECOMMENDED DIMENSIONS FOR FIGURE 1 NOMINAL PIPE SIZE OF NOZZLE


(in)

1.D. OF RUN TO END OF NOZZLE B

O.D. TO O.D. OF NOZZLE

NOZZLES WITHOUT SADDLES OR RING REINFORCEMENT

2-112 3 4
5

6
8

IO
I2 14 I6 I8 20 24

FIGURE 1

MMIMUM RECOMMENDED DIMENSIONS FOR FIGURE 2 NOMINAL

OD. OF RUN TO END OF NOZZLE


A
in.

B
(m)
(114)

2-112

4-1/2
5

NOZZLES WITH REINFORCING SADDLES OR RINGS

3 4 5
6 8 10

5-112 6 6-112
8

9-112 II 12 13 14
15

(127) (140) (152) (165) (203) (241) (279) (305) (330) (356) (381) (406)

12
14

16
18

FIGURE 2

20 24

36

(914)

16

TABLE 2

I
NOMINAL PIPE SIZE 3 F NOZZLE

MINIMUM RECOMMENDED DIMENSIONS FOR FIGURE 3

TO END OF RUN

(in)
2-112
3

A
in. 5-112 (140)

OF NOZZLE B in. (nun) MANUFACTURERS STANDARDS

NOZZLES - INTEGRALLY REINFORCED

4
5

8 IO I2 14
16
V

18

20 24

23 26

(584) (660)

FIGURE 3

TABLE 3
*Minimurn dimension C should be that tabulated for the larger of two adjacent nozzles Dimensions: Inches (Millimeters).

3
COPYRIGHT 2003; Pipe Fabrication Institute Document provided by IHS Licensee=Aramco HQ/9980755100, User=, 03/06/2003 02:28:11 MST Questions or comments about this message: please call the Document Policy Management Group at 1-800-451-1584.

--`,`````,,```,````````````,,-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---

TABLE 1

S T D - P F I ES-7-ENGL 2000

7Lb45qq 0000570 L3b

CHARTER MEMBERS

ACCORD PIPE FABRICATORS, INC. AIR CONDITIONING COMPANY, INC. FLO-RITE, INC. GEM INDUSTRIAL, INC. HPI CONSTRUCTION CO., INC. IDEAL WELDERS, LTD. IVOR J. LEE, INC. JOHN E. GREEN COMPANY
J. F. AHERN CO.

Jamaica, Glendale, Riviera Beach, Walbridge, Huntington, Delta, Masury, Highland Park, Fond du Lac, Longview, Freeport, Santa Clara, Gaithersburg, Tuscaloosa, Beaver Falls, Freeport,
EI Dorado,
St. Louis,

New York California Florida Ohio West Virginia British Columbia (Canada) Ohio Michigan Wisconsin Washington Texas California Maryland Alabama Pennsylvania Illinois Arkansas Missouri Alberta (Canada) Minnesota Wisconsin Wisconsin Ohio Ohio California West Virginia Wisconsin Michigan

J. H. KELLY LLC

J. S. MC KINNEY, INC. KINETIC SYSTEMS, INC. M & M WELDING AND FABRICATORS, INC.
MC ABEE CONSTRUCTION, INC. MC CARL'S, INC. MECHANICAL INCORPORATED MID STATES PIPE FABRICATING, INC. MURPHY COMPANY NARDE1 FABRICATORS, LTD. NEWMECH COMPANIES, INC. PHILLIPS, GETSCHOW COMPANY PIPING SYSTEMS, INC.

COPYRIGHT 2003; Pipe Fabrication Institute

--`,`````,,```,````````````,,-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---

Cakasr, St. Paul, Oconto Falls, New London, Barberion, Dayton, San Leandro, Davisville, Kaukauna, Livonia,

S. A. COMUNALE COMPANY, INC. S&D / OSTERFELD MECHANICAL CONTRACTORS


SCOTT CO. OF CALIFORNIA SPECIALTY PIPING CORPORATION TEAM INDUSTRIES, INC. W. J. O'NEIL COMPANY

A current index of the latest revised ES Standards, Technical Bulletins and Safety Training Guideline is available from the Pipe Fabrication Institute.

PFI Safety Training Guideline, Standards and Technical Bulletins are published to serve proven needs of the pipe fabricating industry at the design level and in actual shop operations. Hence, such needs are continually considered and reviewed by the Engineering Committee of the Pipe Fabrication Institute to provide recommended procedures, which have been demonstrated by collective experiences to fulfill requirements in a manner for Code compliance. However, as the PFI Standards are for minimum requirements the designer or fabricator always has the option of specifying supplementary conditions in the form of requirements beyond the scope of the PFI publications.

Document provided by IHS Licensee=Aramco HQ/9980755100, User=, 03/06/2003 02:28:11 MST Questions or comments about this message: please call the Document Policy Management Group at 1-800-451-1584.

You might also like