Failure in Patients with Stable CAD Renan Sukmawan, MD, PhD Department of Cardiology and Vascular Medicine, Faculty of Medicine University of Indonesia / Harapan Kita National Cardiovascular Center Alternative projections of mortality and disability by cause 19902020: Global Burden of Disease Study Christopher J L, et al. Lancet 1997, 349, We projected that non-communicable disease mortality will increase from 281 million deaths in 1990 to 497 million in 2020. Deaths from injury may increase from 51 million to 84 million. Leading causes of disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) predicted by the baseline model were (in descending order): ischaemic heart disease, unipolar major depression, road-traffic accidents, cerebrovascular disease, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, lower respiratory infections, tuberculosis, war injuries, diarrhoeal diseases, and HIV. NCC Harapan Kita In-patient data 0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 CAD CHF 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 R & D Division, NCC Harapan Kita , 2010 NCC Harapan Kita Out-patient data 0 2000 4000 6000 8000 10000 12000 14000 CAD CHF 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 - Which and when ? - How to prevent ? R & D Division, NCC Harapan Kita , 2010 Heart Failure Stages ACC AHA Guidelines on CHF. Circulation, 2005 Yancy CW. J Am Coll Cardiol 2006;47:76-84 The first hospitalization for HF worsens survival for most patients, regardless of resting EF Bhatia RS. N Engl J Med 2006;355:260-269 Owan TE. N Engl J Med 2006;355:251-259 Development of an Echocardiographic Risk-Stratification Index to Predict Heart Failure in Patients With Stable Coronary Artery Disease (The Heart and Soul Study) To determine TTE measurements most strongly predict HF and to develop an index for risk-stratification in stable CAD Conducted in 1024 pts with stable CAD Defined association of 15 TTE measurements with subsequent HF stay Developing scoring system using independent predictors from multivariate analysis Stevens MS, et al. J Am Coll Cardiol Img 2009;2;11-20 (The Heart and Soul Study) Inclusion Criteria 1. History of myocardial infarction 2. Stenoses > 50% in at least 1 vessel from cor-angiography 3. Stress-induced ischemia from TMT or nuclear perfusion 4. History of coronary revascularization 5. Prior diagnosis of CAD Exclusion Criteria 1. Prior myocardial infarction within the last 6 months 2. Unable to walk 1 block 3. Plan to move out from the local area Stevens MS, et al. J Am Coll Cardiol Img 2009;2;11-20 (The Heart and Soul Study) Resting 2D-echo completed in all subjects The 15 chosen candidate echo variables : 1. LV end-systolic volume index 2. LV end-diastolic volume index 3. LVEF 4. Left atrial volume index (LAVI) 5. Right atrial volume index 6. LV Mass Index (LVMI) 7. PA peak systolic pressure 8. Right atrial volume index 9. VTI RVOT 10. VTI LVOT 11. Aortic valve area 12. Right atrial pressure 13. Diastolic Dysfunction 14. MR severity 14. tricuspid regurgitation severity 15. resting wall motion score index Correlate with LVES Vol Index Correlate with VTI LVOT Stevens MS, et al. J Am Coll Cardiol Img 2009;2;11-20 (The Heart and Soul Study) Results Stevens MS, et al. J Am Coll Cardiol Img 2009;2;11-20 (The Heart and Soul Study) Results Stevens MS, et al. J Am Coll Cardiol Img 2009;2;11-20 (The Heart and Soul Study) Results Stevens MS, et al. J Am Coll Cardiol Img 2009;2;11-20 (The Heart and Soul Study) Results Stevens MS, et al. J Am Coll Cardiol Img 2009;2;11-20 (The Heart and Soul Study) Results Stevens MS, et al. J Am Coll Cardiol Img 2009;2;11-20 Heart Failure Risk Index (HFRI) by resting echo Summary Stevens MS, et al. J Am Coll Cardiol Img 2009;2;11-20 IMAGE of INTEREST MEASUREMENTS SCORE LV Mass Index > 90 g/m 2 3 Diastolic Dysfunction Pseudonormal or Restrictive 2 Mitral Regurgitation > Mild 1 LVOT VTI < 22 cm 1 LA Volume Index 29 ml/m 2 1 Heart Failure Risk Index (HFRI) by resting echo Limitations Studied in caucasian (60%) and men (82%) Primary outcome was only HF hospital stay Not incorporate newer techniques, i.e. TDI, strain Defining diastolic function solely by E/A ratio LA volume index using biplane method of discs, which may be different to the area-length method Dichotomous cut-offs for each measurements Unclear gained to restratifying class A & B of HF by echocardiographic measures only Clinical Impact of HFRI Simplifying data from routine TTE in stable CAD Enhance assessment for HF risk Predicting HF in a patient population with relatively preserved systolic function Complementary to other HF measures, i.e. BNP Perhaps guiding for aggressive treatment in high- risk patients based on HFRI CONCLUSIONS The TTE Heart Failure Risk Index provides method to predict development of heart failure in patients with stable CAD This index represents an important step in simplifying data from a routine TTE and using it to enhance our assessment of risk for heart failure Further studies needed to define the value of TTE Heart Failure Risk Index in clinical decision-making