Professional Documents
Culture Documents
andNa
+
ions
OptimalDistancebetweenAtoms OptimalDistancebetweenAtoms
Interactionsareblendsof
attractiveandrepulsiveforces
Bothforcesareafunctionof
distance
Thepointatwhichthe
differencebetweenthe
attractive repulsiveforcesis
greatestrepresentsthe
optimaldistance p
Polarity Polarity
Whendifferentmolecules
interact,onehasagreater
affinityforelectronsthanthe y
other.
Th l t d it f Theelectrondensityofa
typicalpolarbondisshown
ontheright.
Electronegativity Electronegativity
Electronegativityistheabilityofanatomtoaccept
electrons.
RECALL/REVIEW
The Periodic Table
RECALL: Columns Similar Valence Structure
e
u
p
1
e
-
u
p
2
e
-
e
r
t
g
a
s
e
s
p
t
1
e
-
p
t
2
e
-
g
i
v
g
i
v
e
u
e
u
p
3
e
-
i
n
e
a
c
c
e
p
a
c
c
e
p
He H
Adapted from
Fig. 2.6,
Callister &
Rethwisch 8e
g
i
v
e
O
Se Br
Ne
Ar
Kr
F
Cl S
Li Be
Na Mg
Ca K Sc
Rethwisch 8e.
Te
Po At
I Xe
Rn Ba Cs
Ra Fr
Sr Rb Y
Electropositive elements:
Readily give up electrons
Electronegative elements:
Readily acquire electrons
Ra Fr
Chapter 2 - 77
Readily give up electrons
to become + ions.
Readily acquire electrons
to become - ions.
RECALL/REVIEW
Electronegativity
Ranges from 0.7 to 4.0,
Large values: tendency to acquire electrons.
g y
Smaller electronegativity Larger electronegativity
Chapter 2 - 78
Adapted from Fig. 2.7, Callister & Rethwisch 8e. (Fig. 2.7 is adapted from Linus Pauling, The Nature of the
Chemical Bond, 3rd edition, Copyright 1939 and 1940, 3rd edition. Copyright 1960 by Cornell University.
RECALL/REVIEW
Review Review
Periodic Trends in Atomic Properties Periodic Trends in Atomic Properties
Review Review
Periodic Trends in Atomic Properties Periodic Trends in Atomic Properties Periodic Trends in Atomic Properties Periodic Trends in Atomic Properties Periodic Trends in Atomic Properties Periodic Trends in Atomic Properties
Metallicity (electropositivity):
Tendency of an atom to donate electrons to metallic or
ionic bonds. This is opposite of electronegativity.
I t bi d it l l t ith d d Increases as an atom binds it valence electrons with reduced
strength (i.e., as valence electron-nucleus separation increases,
binding force decreases).
As you go from right to left on the periodic table, the valence
electron-nucleus separation is about the same, but nuclear charge
decreases (thus, binding force decreases).
Increases from top to bottom and from right to left of
periodic table.
Prof. M.L. Weaver
RECALL/REVIEW
Review Review
Periodic Trends in Atomic Properties Periodic Trends in Atomic Properties
Review Review
Periodic Trends in Atomic Properties Periodic Trends in Atomic Properties Periodic Trends in Atomic Properties Periodic Trends in Atomic Properties Periodic Trends in Atomic Properties Periodic Trends in Atomic Properties
Size:
Same trends as metallicity (for the same reasons) Same trends as metallicity (for the same reasons).
REMEMBER that cations (+) are smaller than protons
(neutral), whereas anions (-) are larger.
Mass:
I ith t i b (I b t k h ) Increases with atomic number (I bet you know why).
Periodic trends are not absolute but we can still use Periodic trends are not absolute, but we can still use
these trends to predict bonding and properties.
Prof. M.L. Weaver
RECALL/REVIEW
Types of Bonding Types of Bonding Types of Bonding Types of Bonding
IONIC
0.9 3.0
METALLIC
Van der Waals
COVALENT
There are many models that describe
atomic bonding Ive condensed some
Prof. M.L. Weaver
2011CengageLearningEngineering.AllRightsReserved.
COVALENT
atomic bonding. I ve condensed some
information in the next two lecture
modules. Please read them.
RECALL RECALL
Paulings expression for Paulings expression for ionicity ionicity fraction of a bond fraction of a bond
RECALL RECALL
Paulings expression for Paulings expression for ionicity ionicity fraction of a bond fraction of a bond Pauling s expression for Pauling s expression for ionicity ionicity fraction of a bond fraction of a bond Pauling s expression for Pauling s expression for ionicity ionicity fraction of a bond fraction of a bond
( )
2
1
4
1
nm m
x x
f e
=
x
nm
is the electronegativity of the nonmetallic element
f e
x
m
is the electronegativity of the metallic element
Assume:
f > 0.5 (x > 1.7) ionic bonds
f 0.5 (x 1.7) covalent bonds f 0.5 (x 1.7) covalent bonds
Actual change from metallic to ionic/covalent is more
Prof. M.L. Weaver
complex. Thus we assign some elements as metalloid.
RECALL/REVIEW
Primary Bonding Primary Bonding Primary Bonding Primary Bonding
Metallic Bond -- delocalized as electron cloud
Ionic-Covalent Mixed Bonding
% ionic character =
%) 100 ( x
1e
(X
A
X
B
)
2
4
|
|
|
| % o c c a acte
where X
A
& X
B
are Pauling electronegativities
) (
\
.
|
|
Ex:MgO X
Mg
=1.2
X
O
=3.5
ionic 73.4% (100%) x e 1 character ionic %
4
) 2 . 1 5 . 3 (
2
=
|
|
|
.
|
\
|
=
\
RECALL/REVIEW
Bonding Generalizations Bonding Generalizations
Based on Periodic Trends in EN Based on Periodic Trends in EN contd contd
RECAP
In ternary or more complex compounds, the fractional ionicity
can be determined by using stoichiometrically weighted averages
Based on Periodic Trends in EN Based on Periodic Trends in EN cont d cont d
y g y g g
for the values of x
m
and/or x
nm
, ex.: In
4
Sn
3
O
12
It must be emphasized that the change from metallic to It must be emphasized that the change from metallic to
nonmetallic character is continuous and complex, so much so
that many authors would refute the apparently arbitrary binary
i i d fi d h f categorization defined thus far.
It is more common to define a third class of elements, the ,
metalloids, which straddle the metalnonmetal boundary (e.g.:
B, Si, Ge, As, Te, and Se).
Prof. M.L. Weaver
RECALL/REVIEW
Bonding Bonding Property Interrelationships Property Interrelationships
However, a binary classification is nevertheless implemented because it has the
practical advantage of leading to a simple set of rules to determine bond types.
O th b d t i d fi d th t f t i t t d ti th t th Once the bond type is defined, the type of atomic structure and properties that the
solid might have can also be inferred.
This is illustrated schematically:
When crossing metal-nonmetal
b d ti h
Prof. M.L. Weaver
boundary, properties change
dramatically with variation in
bonding:
CovalentvsIonicBonding CovalentvsIonicBonding
Thepolarityofacovalent
bondisthepartialionic
character
Realbondsliesomewhere
b t i i d l t betweenionicandcovalent
Thedifferencein
electronegativitycorresponds
directlytothepercentionic
characterofthebond