Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Compurrrs c4 Strucrures Vol. 62. No. 4. PP. 699-713. 1997 Copyright 8 1996 Elsevier Science Ltd Printed in Great Bruin. All rights reserved 0045-7949/97 $17.00 + 0.00
ON THE USE OF CHARACTERISTIC ORTHOGONAL POLYNOMIALS IN THE FREE VIBRATION ANALYSIS OF RECTANGULAR ANISOTROPIC PLATES WITH MIXED BOUNDARIES AND CONCENTRATED MASSES
T.-P. Changt and M.-H. Wu
Department of Applied Mathematics, National Chung-Hsing University, Taichung, Taiwan, Republic of China (Received 17 May 1995) this paper, the free vibration analysis of mass-loaded rectangular composite laminates plate with mixed boundaries was performed by using the orthogonal polynomial functions and Ritz method. We developed the subdomain method to derive the governing eigenvalue equation. In the solution process, we used the subdomain weighted residual to satisfy the compatibility at the interconnect boundaries for two adjacent subdomain and carry out continuity matrices, then we adopted the Gram-Schmidt orthogonalization process to find the orthogonal functions set which satisfy the simply subdomain boundary condition. Finally, we used the continuous matrices to develop the global energy functional and applied the Ritz method to obtain the governing eigenvalue equation. By solving the governing eigenvalue equation, we can obtain the natural frequencies and mode shapes of the composite laminates. Furthermore, we also investigated the effects of mixed edge ratio, ply orientation and concentrated masses on the free vibration of the rectangular symmetric composite laminates. Copyright 0 1996 Elsevier Science Ltd.
Abstract-In
I. INTRODUCTION
In recent years, orthogonal polynomials have been widely used in solving the problem of the free vibration of plates. The following researchers have already contributed to the development of this field: in 198 1, Narita (11applied a series-type method to the free vibration of an orthotropic rectangular plate with mixed boundary conditions; in 1983, Fan and Cheung [2] used the spline finite strip method to study the flexural free vi bration response of thin rectangular plates with complex support condition. Moreover, some researchers [3-l 11 used characteristic polynomials and applied Rayleighs method to solve the natural frequencies and mode shapes of elliptical, circular, trapezoidal cantilever, rectangular plates, etc. More recently, the method of orthogonal polynomials and the Ritz method were extended to anisotropic plates and composite laminates. In 1989, Liew et al. [l2] used the orthogonal polynomial function, whch was developed by the Gram-Schmidt orthogonalization process, and adopted the Rayleigh-Ritz procedure to solve flexural vibration of triangular composite plates. In 1992, Chow et al. [I31
t To whom correspondence should be addressed.
used the Rayleigh-Ritz method with the twodimensional orthogonal polynomials to derive the transverse vibration of symmetrically laminated rectangular composite plates. In 1993, Liew et al. [ 141 used the method which decomposed a plate with mixed edges into a subdomain of simple boundary conditions to solve the natural frequencies and mode shapes of the anisotropic plates. In the present study, we used the above methods to solve the free vibration of the composite laminate with mixed boundaries and concentrated masses. We investigated the effects of the fiber orientation, mixed edge ratio and the concentrated masses on the free vibration of these symmetric composite laminates.
2. EQUATION OF
MOTION
In most practical applications of thin plates the magnitude of the stresses acting on surface parallel to the middle plane is small compared to the bending and membrane stresses. Since the plate is thin, this implies that the tractions on any surface parallel to the midplane are relative small. In particular, an approximate state of plane stress exists. A standard x, y, z coordinate system, as shown in Fig. I, is used to derive the equation of motion of the anisotropic laminate plate. The displacements in the _v,y, z
699
Qu - 2Qdc2s2
(3) and
+ Q& + c4),
in which s=sinO, c=cosO
Qu =
QII=&,
___ 1 - VIZV21
v,2E, = v12E2. (4)
v12E2
Q22 =
&
Qtic= G,2,
directions are denoted by u, u, w respectively. For the composite laminates, the following relations are defined between the stress and moment resultants and the stains and curvatures. A,,
.421
Using the equation of equilibrium and eqn (I), and considering the symmetrical composite laminates, the following equation can be derived:
Au
A22
,416 BI,
A2a BZI
B,2
BM
adw
DI 1G
Au ----B,, &I
$-4&h $$
+ D22$
= q(x, y).
(5)
D21 022
Db2 De,
Including the dynamic effect and considering the plate without the applied normal loading, the free transverse vibration of a symmetrical anisotropic plate with several concentrated masses is governed by the following equation:
(1)
D 3
1ax4
4D
,6
a410
Wi2 + 2&d
a4w ax*ay2
where
s
b,2
ph +
c m,6(x
,=I
[
i,j= 1,2,6.
(2)
a,Fv_Y - BJ 1
Q$(1,t,z2)dz - /I,2
x at=0
ah
(6)
where p is the density of the plate, m denotes the concentration mass, (a, /I) is the location of the concentrated mass and NM is the total number of the concentrated masses. The undamped natural free vibration is harmonic and thus the displacement is of the following form:
@12= (QII + Q22- 4Q&*c2 + Q,2(s + c), t722 = Qus + 2(Qi2 + 2Qds2c2 + Q22c4, 0~ = (Qll Q,2 - 2~4~3~ Q22 + 2Qds3c, 2Qds3c
Q,2 -
+ (Q12 -
Q22 + 2Q&3s,
701
Fig. 4. A laminate plate with mixed (simply supported and clamped) boundaries (S-SC-SCS).
(7)
W = 0 $y
= 0
(for a clamped
boundary)
where o denotes the free vibrational natural frequency of the plate. Therefore, the equilibrium condition for the symmetrical anisotropic composite laminated plate can be written as: cy
W = 0 $$
= 0
(for a simply-supported
edge)
= 0 $7
= 0
(10)
normal
3. ORTHOGONAL
POLYNOMIALS
+4D
cwa2w+4D
26ay2 axay
In this paper, the beam characteristic shapes 4.,(x) and $.(y) in eqn (9), are sets of orthogonal polynomials which are selected to satisfy the geometric boundary conditions of the plate. Some basic properties of these orthogonal polynomials are described briefly as follows. Given a polynomial &(x), an orthogonal set polynomials in the interval a < x < b can be generated by using Gram-Schmidt process as follows:
x 6(y - B,) W
=:
I>
dx dy
#I(.~) = (x - BlM4X),
(p(X) = (x - B,)#b- I(X) - C,#i- z(x)
(11)
stationary
value.
(8)
B, =
To set up the governing eigenvalue equation for eqn (8), we assume the solution as the form of a series of products of bea.m characteristic shapes
h xg(x)q%;_ ,(x) dx
xg(xM
g(x)+;-
0)
dx,
c, =
s
h
- I(X)+, - Ax)
dx
,I
where 4.,(x) and v.(y) are the characteristic shapes of free vibration satisfying a set of the following boundary conditions on each end:
where g(x) is the weighting function and the polynomials 4,(x) satisfy the following orthogonality condition,
Table I. Layer material properties for composite laminate plates Materials E-glass-epoxy
E,/Ez Gl?lEZ VI2 P (kg m-7 h (ml
2.45
0.48
0.23
72.0
0.05
702
Fig. 5. A laminate plate with mixed (simply supported and clamped) boundaries (C-G-C-SC).
Fig. 7. A laminate plate with mixed (simply supported and clamped) boundaries (C-CSC-C-CSC). -
s
h
and applying the boundary conditions (15) gives the deflection shape as dx = i,, if; f ; (13) X(x) = A4[(3a%2 - a3 - br) + (a + b3 - 3a26 the weight function is - 3&)x + 6&x2 - 2(a + b)x + x]. (17) Let a = 0 and b = 1, then eqn (17) becomes:
g(x)&(x)+/(x)
s
0
c/$(x) dx = 1.
(14)
X(x) = J&(X - 2x3 + x4), where Aq is an arbitrary constant. mode function is obtained as
(18)
The normalized
Construction of the first member &(x) is carried out so as to satisfy all the boundary conditions of the beam problems accompanying the plate problem. In the present paper, laminates having a variety of boundary conditions are considered. The complicated composite laminates domain is to be cut into several small subdomains with same edges for simple boundary conditions as described in eqn (10). We used fourth or fifth order polynomials as starting terms, the coefficients of the polynomial being chosen to satisfy the equivalent beam end conditions. The first polynomial in the orthogonal set of polynomials is constructed so as to satisfy at least the boundary conditions of the subdomain, both geometric and natural. The method is described below. 3.1. Plate with opposite edges simply supported (S-S) Both of the beam problems boundary conditions, namely
X(a) = x(a)
9.(x)=(x-2x3+x4)~(~x(x)dx)1.2.
(19)
3.2.
Both of accompanying beam problems have the same boundary conditions, namely
X(a) = r(a) = X(b) = x(6) = 0.
(20)
(21)
and applying the boundary conditions (21) gives the deflection shape as
X(x) = AJaW - 2ab(a + b)x + (a + 4ab + b2)X2- 2(n + b)x + x4]. (22)
= X(b) = X(b) = 0.
(15)
Let a = 0 and b = 1, then eqn (22) becomes: Assuming the beam deflection as X(x) =
X(x) = Ao + A,x + AIX + A3x3 + A4x4 (16)
A4(X2 -
2x + x4),
(23)
The normalized
Fig. 6. A laminate plate with mixed (simply supported and clamped) boundaries (S-SCS-S-SCS).
It might be convenient, at this point, to introduce the terminology to be used throughout the remainder of the paper for describing the boundary conditions of the laminates considered. The types of laminates
Characteristic orthogonal polynomials Table 2. Frequency parameter i, = (~~wW/D#~ of four-layer laminates (0/-0/-13/f?) with S-S-S-S boundary conditions Al,gorithm
Liew et al. [14] Leissa el nl. [22] Chow et 01. [13] Present method Leissa et uf. [22] Chow et al. [I31 Present method
703
1
15.19 15.19 15.19 15.19 16.29 16.29 16.28
Number of mode 3 4
5
64.53 64.53 64.55 64.54 77.56 77.56 77.52
6
90.30 90.21 90.31 90.26 79.60 79.60 79.56
e = 0
33.30 33.30 33.31 33.29 37.71 37.71 37.68 44.42 44.42 44.52 44.44 60.78 60.77 60.78 60.76 63.29 63.29 63.23
e = 450
41.63 41.63 41.60
considered in the present work are S-S and C-C. The starting functions used in this study are as follows: S-S c-c X(x) = C,(x - 2x3 + x4) X(x) = &(x2 - 2x + x);
C, is an arbitrary constant. 4. METHODOF ANALYSIS The Gram-Schmid method which generated orthogonal polynomials in conjunction with Rayleigh-Ritz method had been used for the study of free vibration of isotopic rectangular plates. This technique will be adopted to perform the free vibration of rectangular composite laminates with several concentrated masses. It is assumed that the plate lies in the x - y plate, is bounded by x = 0, a and y = 0, b, is of uniform thickness, rectangularly composite laminates material. For the free vibration of the laminates, the deflection w may be represented
by the expression w(x, y, t) = W(x, y)sin wt
conditions of the laminates, w is the radian natural frequency by vibration and t is the time. In the present study, the technique developed by Liew et al. [14] was adopted to establish the governing eigenvalue equation for composite Iaminates wth partial mixed discontinuous edges. The complex composite laminates domain to be cut into small subdomains with same edges for simple boundary conditions, as shown in Fig. 3. The displacement W of each subdomain is chosen to satisfy the boundary conditions of the subdomain
(26)
(27)
where t = 2,3, . . . , h4, and M, is the total number of subdomains. Consider the two connected subdomains, the displacement function Wmust have the same 4(x) or $b) corresponding the same boundary condition in the s- or y-direction, i.e. &:(.u) = $,;:-l(x); or m = 1,2, 3.. ,M (28)
(25)
where 4,,,(x), Ii/,,(v) are appropriate polynomial functions satisfying at least the geometric boundary
r,@(y) = I&-~(v);
n = 1,2,3..
with C-C-C-C
, N.
(29)
Table 3. Frequency parameter /1 = (phwW/Do)~of four-layer laminates (t?/-fl-e/e) boundary conditions Algorithm Liew ef ai. 1141 Chow et al. [13] Present method Chow et aI. [13] Present method
1
29.10 29.13 29.12 28.53 28.53
Number of mode 3
8=0
0 = 45
60.22 60.24
704
laminates
(O/~/O/O) with
Algorithm Liew et al. [14] Present method Ltew et al. [14] Present method Liew et al. [14] Present method
45.64 45.66
d= 1.0
44.42 44.44
Because the interconnecting boundary is continuous, the deflection, slope and higher derivatives of the WI and WI - If must be equal to the exact solution. Therefore, the following expression is defined by using the weighted residual method. R = L[ WI: _ WC - I (30) where i=l,2,3 ,..., Ie; t=2,3,4 ,..., M,; r=l, 2,3, . , N - 1 and s = x or s = y depending on the direction of connecting boundary. The deflections W of each subdomain have been defined by eqns (26) and (27). A set of continuity matrices for the eigenvectors A, of the adjacent subdomains can be obtained from the above method of subdomain weighted residual. The derivation process is described here with for subdomains 1 and 2. These two subdomains have the same &(x) for the same boundary condition in the x-direction, i.e. @I = &f(x); form = 1,2, 3,. . . , M. (35)
where L is a linear differential operator which denotes the nth partial derivative of the function inside the bracket with respect to x or y. Now, we will divide the interconnecting boundary into I subdomains then we use the method of subdomain weighted residual to integrate the residual R over each subdomain.
s
0 therefore
0
Rds=O;
i=
1,2,3 ,...,
I,
(31)
Also we know
,gJf#l~(x)$~(y)
WI<: _
w:-
1:)
ds = 0,
(32)
Wll(x,
y)
11
n, n
(36)
as SC
>,_,
Table
dwl:
--
awl--II
ds=O
as>
parameter
(33) (37)
5. Frequency
laminates
(0/00/00/00) with
Algorithm Liew et al. [14] Present method Liew et al. [14] Present method Liew et al. [14] Present method
46.36 46.41
1.0
45.68 45.68
47.03 47.05
Characteristic orthogonal polynomials Table 6. Freqeuncy parameters I = (uAr4/D~)~* of four-layer laminates for case 4 (C-CSC-C-CSC) Number of mode
M/phab 0.0 0 (0/00/00/00) (lS/ -45/ -45/45) (0/90/90/00) (~/OO/OO/oy (4s0/- 45/ - 45/45) (0/90/90/00) (oO/oO/o~/oq (45=/-45/-45/45) (0/90/90/00) (0/00/00/00) (45/-45/-45/45) (0/90/90/00) (~/0/0/00) (uO/-45/ -45/45) (0/90/90/00) (W/OO/OO/OO) (45O/ - 45/ - 45/45) (0/90/90/00) 1 13.91 12.90 13.67 7.662 7.420 7.663 5.671 5.481 5.627 4.639 4.537 4.650 4.040 3.956 4.051 3.626 3.552 3.636 2 22.24 24.32 22.86 15.97 15.89 15.88 15.72 15.47 15.59 15.65 15.35 15.51 15.61 15.29 15.47 15.59 15.25 15.45 3 35.04 30.22 34.00 25.73 25.17 26.04 25.53 25.14 25.87 25.47 25.13 25.82 25.44 25.12 25.79 25.42 25.12 25.77 4 37.96 40.89 40.10 36.49 35.76 36.21 36.47 35.62 36.16 36.46 35.57 36.14 36.46 35.55 36.14 36.46 35.53 36.13 5 43.41 46.37 43.14 39.26 42.40 40.63 39.24 42.36 40.62 39.23 42.35 40.62 39.22 42.35 40.62 39.22 42.34 40.62 6 58.71 54.70 59.93 52.13 49.54 52.28 52.01 49.50 52.15 51.98 49.48 52.11 51.96 49.48 52.09 51.95 49.47 52.08
1.0
2.0
3.0
4.0
5.0
Substituting eqns (36) (37) into eqns (32), (33) and (34), we can obtain the following equations:
the following
equations
can be
+ H&k;
= 0,
(42)
(43)
(39)
_
Now if we define
Azi
w:;(x)
t,+;(y) 3
dy = 0.
(40)
Fig. 8. Frequency parameter A of case 1 (S-SC-S-CS) without concentrated mass for various simply supported
mixed ratio.
CAS 6214-D
706
T.-P. Chang
and M.-H.
Wu
Fig. 9. Frequency parameter 1 of case 2 (C-CS-C-SC) without concentrated mass for vartous clamped mtxed ratio.
Frequency parameter I of case 4 (C-CSC-C-CSC) concentrated mass for various stmply supported mixed ratio.
In order to satisfy eqns (42)<44) simultaneously, all the terms H,,, must be equal to zero. Therefore H, = HZ = Now if we denote
[p] =
Therefore, form:
[@;I-[Gl].
. = HM = 0.
(45)
the continuity
matrix
If; gm -
s
1,
tii (Y) dy
a matrix of
(46)
[pl:] =
I/- I
can
obtain
the
. I
[PI [PI [PI
{,$21} = [pl2l]{,$I}.
(50)
[PI
matrix
of
(51)
The elements of the matrix [G], 4,:; can be calculated from the following integration: From eqn (45), we know
Fig. 10. Frequency parameter I of case 3 (S-SCS-S-SCS) without concentrated mass for various clamped mixed ratio.
Fig. 12. Frequency parameter 1 of case I (S-SC-SCS) concentrated mass for various simply supported ratio.
with mixed
707
Fig 13. Frequency parameter i of case 2 (C-CS-CSC) with concentrated mass for various clamped mixed ratio.
g,.
I(
? , s
?I -I
Fig. 15. Frequency parameter /I of case 4 (C-CSC-C-CSC) with concentrated mass for various simply supported mixed ratio.
!a2
$i(y) dy.
(53)
T:)
ph + y
,=I
mJ(x -
51)
From the above process, the derivation of the continuity matrix can be easily generalized to three or more subdomains for two interconnecting boundaries. Now we are ready to derive the eigenvalue equation by using the continuity matrix. Let the strain energy W and the kinetic energy TiCi for a rectangular subdomain be expressed as follows:
dy.
(55)
Substituting eqns (26) or (27) into eqns (54) and (55) yields:
Vi: = c c 1 1 A&;, mn I,
+20
22 ay2
( >
26ay* axay
Ea*w
(54)
a*w 2
+40
dx dy
and
Fig. 14. Frequency parameter I of case 3 (S-SCS-SSCS) with concentrated mass for various clamped mixed ratio.
Fig. 16. Frequency parameter ,I of case 1 (S-SC-S-G) concentrated mass at point (0.25,0.25).
with
Frg. 17. Frequency parameter 1 of case 1 (S-SC-S-CS) with concentrated mass at point (0.5,0.5).
Frg. 19. Frequency parameter ibf case I (S-SC-SCS), with concentrated mass located along the y-axts (5 = 0.5).
(56)
and
p: =
s
R
{AJT[K:f]{A)
dR
(60)
TEci =
s
R
{A}T[M~~]{,4} dR
(61)
[~.,(5)~,(5)11/.(11)~,(~)1 d5 drl
where 5 = x/a, q = y/b and mk are some masses points (&, Q). Now denote EL;,, FL; as follows:
and and
+ 4yD&!,F!; )
(62)
(63) where m,i=1,2,3 ,_.., M, n,j=1,2,3 ,..., N and Do = E,h/[12(1 - v,~v~,)], 7 = b/a. Now, we transform [K::] and [MC] for subdomain {t) using continuity matrix [Pfl] of eqn (50), we can then derive the following expression:
[RkI] = [SII:][KIG][$I]
(64)
and Fig. 18. Frequency parameter I of case 1 (S-SC-S-CS), with concentrated mass located along the x-axis (q = 0.5). (65)
where
(70)
(66)
The total energy functional can be expressed as the difference between the total strain energy and kinetic energy as follows: C=V-T.
Using eqns (64), (65) and (66) with eqns (60) and (61) the strain energy I/i! and kinetic energy TLC; for each subdomain can be written as follows:
iv
The total energy functional is minimized with respect to the coefficients A,!,, i.e.
, , ,.. 2 mn=123 3
(72)
pi =
s
A rer
This leads to the governing eigenvalue equation for the entire composite laminate plate domain:
dA.
{~Vi}T[,@~](~N}
(68)
(73)
Then the total strain energy, V, and total kinetic energy, T, of the entire composite laminate plate can be obtained as follows:
(74) (69)
X = 42.35
Mode
Mode
Mode 3 Fig. 20. The first six mode shapes of case 2 (45/-45/-45/45)
Mode 0
without concentrated mass.
A = Mode 1
35.21
x = 17.41
Mode 2 Mode 5
A = 45.21
X = 27.38
Mode 3
of case 2 (45/ -45/-45/45)
Jt = 51.76
Mode G
mass. with concentrated
[K]
[KX]
[p]
r=2 and
(75)
[M]
= [MI:]
2 [&::I.
<=*
(76)
So the natural frequencies and coefficients for the deflection mode shapes [eqns (26) and (27)] are obtained by solving the governing eigenvalue equation (73).
5. NUMERICAL
(1) The boundary condition, as shown in Fig. 4, with two opposite edges simply supported and the other two edges supported mixed with clamped (S-CS-S-SC). (2) The boundary condition, as shown in Fig. 5, with two opposite edges clamped and the other two edges clamped mixed with simply supported (C-SCc-CS). (3) The boundary condition, as shown in Fig. 6, with two opposite edges simply supported and the other two edges simply supported mixed with clamped in the center (SSCS-S-SCS). (4) The boundary condition, as shown in Fig. 7, with two opposite edges clamped and the other clamped mixed with simply supported in the center (CCSC-c-CSC). For simplicity, we chose the length-width ratio y = 1.0 and considered the ply angle (0/0/e/0) for three different cases (O/Oo/Oo/O~), (45/ -45/45/ 45), (0/90/90/0), and adopted four ply laminates composite plate. To prove the validity of the proposed method, we compared the numerical results based on the present method with those results which have been computed by some other researchers. It should be noted that all the comparisons here are performed without the concentrated mass since the concentrated mass was not considered in all the other
A few numerical examples are performed to illustrate the application of the proposed method. In this paper, the geometry of a rectangular composite laminated plate of dimension a x b, is shown in Fig. 2 with the fiber orientation indicated by the angle 0. The subdomain method as shown in Fig. 3 is used to perform the free vibration analysis with mixed edge boundary condition and concentrated mass. The material property for the composite material used in this paper is given in Table 1 from Ref. [13]. In the present study, the following four different boundary conditions have been considered:
711
works. The non-dimensional frequency parameter is expressed as l(pli~~~~/&)~~. It can be seen from Tables 2-5 that the comparisons reveal good agreement as far as the first six eigenvalues are concerned. For simplicity, the concentrated mass is assumed to be only one which is located at point (0.25,0.25), and the non-dimensional frequency parameter is expressed as l(w2a4/D0)2. The first six frequency parameters for the case 4 are given in Table 6. A study on the frequency parameters 1 due to the variation of concentrated mass from zero to five times the laminate mass combined with ply oritentation 0 is carried out for the composites symmetric laminates. In the following discussion, the concentrated mass is assumed to be equal to half of the laminated mass and the non-dimensional frequency is expressed as 1 = (wa/D#2 with concentrated mass or I = (ph&4/Do)~2 without concentrated mass. In Figs 8-l 1, the eigenvalues of cases 1-4 without the concentrated mass have been presented for various simply supported or clamped ratio of mixed boundaries, respectively. In Figs 12-15, the parameters and boundary conditions are the same as those in Figs 8-11, except that the composite laminate is loaded with a concentrated mass located at point (0.25,0.25). As it can be seen from Figs 12-15, the results are quite similar to those in Figs 8-l 1. In Figs 16-l 9, the boundary condition as
in case 1 with mixed ratio equal to 0.5 is considered. The concentrated mass which is varied from zero to five times the laminate mass, is located at point (0.25,0.25), as shown in Fig. 16 and at point (0.5,0.5), as shown in Fig. 17. It can be seen from Figs 16 and 17 that the first eigenvalue of the composite laminates is larger when the concentrated mass is located at point (0.25,0.25), also the first eigenvalue is more strongly affected by the concentrated mass located at point (0.5,0.5) rather than that located at point (0.25, 0.25). We loaded the concentrated mass which is located at TV = 0.5 along the x-axis, as shown in Fig. 18 and at 5 = 0.5 along the y-axis, as shown in Fig. 19. We presented the variation of the first eigenvalue due to the various location of the concentrated mass in Figs 18 and 19. Finally in Figs 20-23, the first six mode shapes of the composite laminates (45/ -45/ - 45/45) with or without concentrated mass are shown for cases 2 and 4 individually. It can be concluded that the mode shapes of the composite laminates are strongly affected by the boundary conditions and concentrated masses.
6. CONCLUSIONS
A simple, efficient and accurate approximate method was introduced to study the free vibrational behavior of rectangular symmetrically composite
A = 12.90
Mode
Mode
X = 46.37
Mode 2 Mode 5
Mode 3 Fig. 22. The first six mode shapes of case 4(45/-45/-45/45)
Mode
712
X = 42.46 Mode
2 Mode 5
X = 49.64
Mode 3
of case 4 (45/-45/ -45/45)
Mode
G
mass.
with concentrated
laminates with mixed edge boundary conditions and concentrated masses. The orthogonal polynomial functions set was constructed by using GramSchmidt orthogonalization process. The energy functional was obtained by using subdomain method with a set of orthogonal polynomials. Based on the Rayleigh-Ritz procedure, the governing eigenvalue equation for the composite laminates was then derived by minimizing the energy functional with respect to each unknown coefficient. By solving this governing eigenvalue equation, we can obtain the natural frequencies and the mode shapes for the laminates composite plate with concentrated mass. In the previous study, various mixed edge boundary conditions and concentrated masses were considered, and different ply angles of the composite laminates were investigated as well. It can be concluded that the eigenvalues of the composite laminates are strongly influenced by the concentrated masses and mixed boundaries, also the mode shapes of the composite laminates with the concentrated masses are quite different from those of the composite laminates without the concentrated masses. In practice, we believe that the present work is quite important, since it provides additional useful design information for engineers who are engaged in the area of thin composite laminates plate with mixed boundaries and concentrated masses.
Acknowledgement-This work was partially supported by the National Science Council of the Republic -of China
under grant NSC 84-2212-E005-008. The authors grateful for this support.
are
REFERENCES
4.
5.
6.
7.
Y. Narita, Application of a series-type method to vibration or orthotropic rectangular plates with mixed boundary conditions. J. Sound Vibr. 71, 345-355 (1981). S. C. Fan and Y. K. Cheung, Flexural free vibrations of rectangular plates with complex support conditions. J. Sound Vibr. 93(l), 81-94 (1984). C. Rajalingham, R. B. Bhat and G. D. Xistris, Natural frequencies and mode shapes of elliptic plates with boundary characteristic orthogonal polynomials as assumed shape function. J. Vibr. Acousr. 115, 353-358 (1993). R. B. Bhat, Natural frequencies of rectangular plates using characteristic orthogonal polynomials in Rayleigh-Ritz method. J. Sound Vibr. 102, 493499 (1985). B. Singh and S. Chakraverty, Transverse vibration of simply supported elliptical and circular using boundary characteristic orthogonal polynomials in two variables. J. Sound Vibr. 152(l), 149-155 (1992). P. A. A. Laura, R. H. Gutierrezder and R. B. Bhat, Transverse vibration of a trapezoidal cantilever plate of variable thickness. AIAA 27(l), 921-922 (1989). T. Mizusawa, Natural frequencies of rectangular plates with free edges. J. Sound Vibr. 105(3), 451459 (1986).
Characteristic
orthogonal
polynomials
713
A theoretical formulation for the 8. G. N. Geannakake, natural frequency, bucking, and deflection analysis of plates using natural co-ordinates and characteristic orthogonal polynomials. J. Sound Vibr. 124(2), 385-387 (1988). and A. Di Blasio, On the using of 9. S. M. Dickinson orthogonal polynomials in the Rayleigh-Ritz method for the study of the flexural vibration and bucking of isotropic and orthotropic rectangular plates. J. Sound Vibr. 108(l), 51-62 (1986). IO. R. B. Bhat, Flexural vibration of polygonal plates using characteristic orthogonal polynomials in two variables. J. Sound Vibr. 114, 65-71 (1987). 11. K. M. Liew, K. I.. Lam and S. T. Chow, Free vibration analysis of rectangular plates using orthogonal plates function. Compuf.-St&i. 34(l), 79-85 (1990). 12. K. M. Liew. K. Y. Lam and S. T. Chow, Study on flexural vibraticsn of triangular composite plates influenced by fiber orientation. Compos. Strut/. 13, 123-132 (1989). 13. S. T. Chow, K. M. Liew and K. Y. Lam, Transverse vibration of symmetrically laminated rectangular composite plates, Compos. Struct. 20, 213-226 (1992). 14. K. M. Liew, K. SC. Hung and M. K. Lim, Method of domain decomposition in vibrations of mixed edge
15.
16.
17.
18.
anisotropic plates. Inr. J. Solids S~ucr. 30(23), 3281-3301 (1993). A. K. Noor and L. H. Tenek, Stiffness and thermoelastic coefficients for composite laminates. Compos. Sfruct. 21, 57-66 (1992). D. J. Gorman, An exact analysis approach to the free vibration analysis of rectangular plates with mixed boundary conditions. J. Sound Vibr. 93(2), 235-247 (1984). S. M. Dickinson and E. K. H. Li. On the use of simply-supported plate functions in the Rayleigh-Ritz method applied to the flexural vibration of rectangular plates. J. Sound Vibr. 80, 292-297 (1982). D. J. Dawe and S. Wang, Free vibration of generally-laminated, shear-deformable, composite rectangular plates using a spline Rayleigh-Ritz method. Compos. Struct. 25, 77-87 (1993). J. E. Ashton and J. M. Whitney, Theory of Laminated Plates. Technomic, Lancaster, PA (1970). R. F. Gibson, Principles of Composire Material Mechanics. McGraw-H& New York (1994). A. C. Ueural. Srresses in Plates and Shells. McGrawHill, New York (1981). A. W. Leissa and Y. Natita, Vibration studies for simply supported symmetrically laminated rectangular plates. Compos. Swucr. 12, 113-132 (1989).