Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Spearman
Uncertainty in the price of high yielding varieties
in selling time
Rank *** 495 / 30 *** 242 / 0 -
Lower quality and lower marketable of product
varieties
Rank *** 988 / 49 *** 311 / 0 -
Low profitability compared with local varieties Rank *** 636 / 31 *** 266 / 0 -
Failure to provide timely inputs Rank *** 878 / 25 *** 277 / 0 -
Prolonged cultured period Rank *** 862 / 53 *** 421 / 0 -
More water need Rank *** 389 / 45 *** 334 / 0 -
Require more fertilizer Rank *** 586 / 46 *** 406 / 0 -
Not resistant of high yielding varieties to pests
and diseases
Rank *** 062 / 43 *** 234 / 0
Source: Research findings, *** Significant at 99% confidence level
To investigate the factors affecting the cultivation of high yielding varieties that have a inhibitor effect in
the interest of farmers to the cultivation of these varieties and finally lead to partial acceptance or rejection of
Independent variable Scale
2
Spearman
Higher yield of high yielding varieties rank *** 002 / 99 *** 807 / 0
Receive subsidized seeds rank *** 916 / 21 *** 346 / 0
Receive free inputs (seedlings and fertilizer box) rank *** 233 / 27 *** 429 / 0
Priorities of cultivation of high yielding varieties to use
for rice observers
rank *** 533 / 35 *** 471 / 0
Guaranteed Order rank *** 547 / 15 *** 320 / 0
Priorities of cultivation of high yielding varieties to use
insurance
rank *** 936 / 95 *** 794 / 0
Intl J Agri Crop Sci. Vol., 4 (18), 1311-1317, 2012
1316
the innovation in the part of them Friedman mean rank test was used. As data in Table (6) implies there are
significant differences between the inhibitor factors that are preventing the adoption of innovations. This means
that farmers determined the long-term cultivation of high yielding varieties compared to local varieties as the
most important factor in their willingness to accept these varieties followed by more water need, require more
fertilizer, not resistant of high yielding varieties to pests and diseases, low profitability compared with local
varieties, lower quality and lower marketable of high yielding varieties as well as uncertainty in the price of high
yielding varieties in selling time, together. Finally, the farmers consider the factor of failure to provide timely
inputs to sales as the second rank of importance. At the end, the farmers have been classified the factor of
failure to provide timely inputs as the least important practice in the list of inhibitor factors.
Table 7. Comparison of mean assessment of farmers from inhibitor factors influencing on the adoption of growing cultivation
of high yielding varieties
Variable
Friedman-Test
number Mean rank Rank
Uncertainty in the price of high yielding varieties in
selling time 138 22 / 4
B
Lower quality and lower marketable of product varieties 138 83 / 4 B
Low profitability compared with local varieties 138 36 / 4 B
Failure to provide timely inputs 138 51 / 3 C
Prolonged cultured period 138 06 / 5 A
More water need 138 54 / 4 B
Require more fertilizer 138 63 / 4 B
Not resistant of high yielding varieties to pests and
diseases
138
84 / 4
B
7 df= 000 / 0 Sig=
122 / 65 =
2
Spearman
Agricultural job satisfaction Rank *** 577 / 5 *** 173 / 0
Achievement Rank *** 448 / 8 *** 236 / 0
Innovativeness Rank *** 143 / 6 *** 204 / 0
Retrogression Rank
ns
183 / 2
ns
120 / 0
Satisfaction of rice supervisors practice Rank
ns
384 / 3
ns
078 / 0
Source: Research findings, *** Significant at 99% confidence level and ns:not Significant
DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION
Due to the complex of promoter factors on the adoption of growing high yielding varieties and
significant effects of these factors on innovation adoption, but the lack of acceptance of farmers to new varieties
of rice, it is concluded that these factors compared to inhibitor factors that cause to reject innovation have little
Intl J Agri Crop Sci. Vol., 4 (18), 1311-1317, 2012
1317
or no encouraging power. Even guaranteed order of high yielding varieties by government that guarantees the
product, although has significant effect, among a series of motivators has the lowest correlation with the
adoption of high yielding varieties. On the other hand, a significant effect of extension education on the adoption
of growing high yielding varieties besides the small number of farmers participating in the training of these
cultivars indicating the lacking of attention to the place and actual role of extension training to transfer new
technology to farmers.
Despite of the warranted purchase of high-yielding rice by government, farmers often have concerns
about the cost of high yielding varieties on sale. These concerns can be studied in two sides. One is the
guaranteed price of high yielding varieties that every year announced by government. Farmers do not fit the
desired prices. And agree that, due to the lack of marketable of high-yielding rice compared with local cultivars,
the only option before them to sell a product is buying it by the government. The mismatch between the
guaranteed purchase price with production risk and the increasing cost of cultivation high yielding varieties
causes these spices have no economic justification in view of farmers. On the other hand, farmers are not
involved in determining the guaranteed purchase price and believe that prices are determined at the national
level is not enough to convince farmers to grow high yielding varieties. The practicing of guaranteed purchase
policy of agricultural crops itself is an incentive to encourage farmers to grow crops that are supported this way.
However, this is a necessary condition for changing the culture of species that are not protected by this policy to
the species that are supported this way. Tool of guaranteed price will be effective when the determined cost is
reflection of the realities governing on the production. Given that the guaranteed purchase price is determined
at the national level, it is recommended that prior approval of the cost per year, production costs of high yielding
varieties analysis by Agriculture Organization of Guilan and Mazandaran and the proposed prices due to the
annual inflation rate and a higher cost of production inputs declared to the Economic Council.
Yielding varieties reach optimal performance when used in conjunction with complementary inputs.
Among the most important supplementary inputs in cultivation of these species is fertilizer that the failure to
timely provides leaves direct impact on reducing the yield of product. Because much of the fertilizer supply
mechanism is outside the province, more active role of the state responsible agencies such as Agriculture
Organization and agricultural support services for effective and efficient administrative arrangements
foundations is very important in order to provide timely fertilizer. And it seems that intra and extra- organization
communication to fulfill this important need further review and coordination.
High yielding varieties require more water than native varieties that is an inhibitor factor to adoption the
growing of this species. Due to the high sensitivity of high yielding varieties to water deficit stress, it is
necessary to coordinate cultivation program in proportion to the existing water before starting each crop year.
To this end, more harmony between Agriculture Organization of the province of Guilan and Regional Water
Company and Meteorological organization is required.
Rice farmers in his assessment of the characteristics of high yielding varieties consider long period of
cultivation and low quality of cooking that is affected market-friendly medium of these varieties as the inhibitor
factors to the adoption of these innovations. It is necessary that Rice Research Institutes by the definition of
research to improve the agronomic and economic characteristics of high yielding varieties solve this problem.
REFERENCES
Sarokhani B. 2001. Research methods in social sciences, Institute for Humanities and Cultural Studies, Volume II, Sixth Edition, pp. 25, 87,
119, 133.
Mansourfar K. 1996. Statistically methods, Tehran University Press, Fifth Edition, pp 93,106
Ramezani Kh. 2000. Research methods in the behavioral sciences and social sciences, Fatemieh publishing, third Edition, pp. 135,139.
Rafipour F. 1985. Rural community and its needs, Chapakhsh Press, p 93.
Fajeria NK. 1995. Increase crop yield, Abolhassan Hashemi dezfoli et al, Mashhad University Jihad, First Edition, pp. 1, 10, and 19.
Malekan S. 2003. Balance between production and consumption of wheat, Jihad Magazine, No. 257, pp. 51-56.
Einollahi AM. 2008. Factors influencing the adoption of wheat farmers insurance of Zanjan province: case study of Khodabandeh city,
Journal of Agricultural and Development Economics, No. 63, pp. 51-70.
Food and Agricultural Organization. 1994. Agricultural price policies, issues and suggestions, translated by seyyed javad Mir, Publications
of the Ministry of Jihad.