FKEE/PSM/1(B)

FAKULTI KEJURUTERAAN ELEKTRIK & ELEKTRONIK UNIVERSITI MALAYSIA PAHANG (UMP)

BORANG PENILAIAN SEMINAR PSM 1

Reminder:
1. 2. Students must fill in personal and project particulars before giving this form to the panel of evaluators. Presentation time is 8 minutes. Q & A session is 2 minutes.

Student Name:

Student ID: Section / Program:

Project Code:

/
Project Title:

SUBJECT

MARKS
PO3

SEMINAR 1 (35%) (CO2)

Problem Statement Clear and logical Fail to provide a adequate level of explaination of problem statement Objective Clear and related with problem statement Clear explaination Fails to provide adequate level of explanation of project objective and research scope. TOTAL (PART A) Coverage of content and source The appropriate content in consideration is covered in depth without being redundant. Sources are cited when specific statements are made. Significance to the course is unquestionable. A wide range of sources have been identified and used. Sources are fairly presented on. Major research/project contributors are missing. Too much focus on one or two research articles. No literature review Flow of the review The literature review goes from general ideas to specific conclusions. Transitions tie sections together. There is a basic flow from one section to the next, but not all sections follow in a natural The literature review appears to have no direction, with subtopics appearing disjointed. No literature review TOTAL (Divide by 2) (PART B) Proposed Solution Proposed solution seems to be able to solve the problem stated with sufficient level of engineering approach Proposed solution seems to be able to solve the problem stated with fairly adequate level of engineering approach Proposed solution seems not appropriate to solve the problem stated, however contains fairly adequate level of engineering approach Fails to provide any solution to stated problem Level of Understanding Demonstrate complete understanding of the proposed solution Demonstrate limited understanding of the proposed solution Does not understands the proposed solution Doability Proposed solution is practical in term of available resources Not practical TOTAL (PART C) PO4 PO5

PO5

/2 PO4

3 Oct 2012

FKEE/PSM/1(B)

Resource & Financial Planning Able to provide comprehensive budget plan. Able to provide comprehensive plan of execution. Able to identify how and where to acquire the resources/ tools Able to list components, equipment/ tools that involve in the project Able to identify the project activities. Unable to identify the project activity. TOTAL (Divide by 5) (PART D) Presentation skill Personality Clarity of speaking (confident level)

PO12

/5 PO7

Use of audio visual aids (creativity, informative, readable)

Body language Content Organization

Question & Answer

TOTAL (Divide by 2) (PART E) Expected Result Very clear explanation and demonstrate good fundamental understanding of the projected outcome of the project Acceptable explanation and demonstrate satisfactory fundamental understanding of the projected outcome of the project Not Clear explanation and demonstrate minimum fundamental understanding of the projected outcome of the project TOTAL (PART F)

/2 PO

PART A+B+C+D+E+F

ALL MARKS (35%) : Comments/suggestions: Evaluator name: Signature: Evaluation Date:

Remarks:
1. Please transfer students mark above into table below according to its respective PO.

PO ASSESSMENT (CO2)

PART A CO2/PO03 (3)

PART B CO2/PO05 (5)

PART C CO2/PO04 (15)

PART D CO2/PO12 (2)

PART E CO2/PO07 (5)

PART F CO2/PO (5)

3 Oct 2012