Professional Documents
Culture Documents
\tan
1
(
x
0
y
0
)
What is the total charge on the plane x = 0?
(d) Show that far from the origin [ >>
0
, where =
.x
2
+y
2
and
0
=
.
x
0
2
+y
0
2
] the leading term in the
potential is
4-4
asym
=
4\
c
0
( x
0
y
0
)( xy)
p
4
Interpret.
SOLUTION:
Using the method of images, let us put an image line charge ' at (-x
0
, y
0
), an image line charge '' at
(x
0
, -y
0
), and an image line charge ''' at (-x
0
, -y
0
) and conceptually remove the conducting surface.
The solution to the potential for the four line charges is:
4( x , y)=
1
4c
0
\ln
(
R
2
( xx
0
)
2
+( yy
0
)
2
)
+
1
4c
0
\' ln
(
R
2
( x+x
0
)
2
+( yy
0
)
2
)
+
1
4c
0
\'' ln
(
R
2
( xx
0
)
2
+( y+y
0
)
2
)
+
1
4c
0
\''' ln
(
R
2
( x+x
0
)
2
+( y+y
0
)
2
)
Apply the boundary condition 4( x=0, y)=0
0=\ln
(
R
2
x
0
2
+( yy
0
)
2
)
+\' ln
(
R
2
x
0
2
+( yy
0
)
2
)
+\'' ln
(
R
2
x
0
2
+( y+y
0
)
2
)
+\''' ln
(
R
2
x
0
2
+( y+y
0
)
2
)
0=ln
(
R
2
x
0
2
+( yy
0
)
2
)
\
(
R
2
x
0
2
+( yy
0
)
2
)
\'
(
R
2
x
0
2
+( y+y
0
)
2
)
\''
(
R
2
x
0
2
+( y+y
0
)
2
)
\'''
|
1=
(
R
2
x
0
2
+( yy
0
)
2
)
\+\'
(
R
2
x
0
2
+( y+y
0
)
2
)
\ ''+\ '''
This can only be true for all y if \+\'=0 and \''+\'''=0
Apply the boundary condition 4( x , y=0)=0
0=\ln
(
R
2
( xx
0
)
2
+y
0
2
)
+\' ln
(
R
2
( x+x
0
)
2
+y
0
2
)
+\'' ln
(
R
2
( xx
0
)
2
+y
0
2
)
+\''' ln
(
R
2
( x+x
0
)
2
+y
0
2
)
1=
(
R
2
( xx
0
)
2
+y
0
2
)
\+\ ''
(
R
2
( x+x
0
)
2
+y
0
2
)
\ '+\'''
This can only be true for all x if \+\''=0 and \'+\'''=0
x
y
(x
0
, y
0
)
x
y
(x
0
, y
0
)
(x
0
, -y
0
)
''
(-x
0
, y
0
)
'
(-x
0
, -y
0
)
'''
Using the four equations in boxes, we now have four equations and three unknowns. We solve for
each:
\'=\ , \''=\ , \'''=\
The final solution is then:
4( x , y)=
1
4c
0
\ln
(
R
2
( xx
0
)
2
+( yy
0
)
2
)
1
4c
0
\ln
(
R
2
( x+x
0
)
2
+( yy
0
)
2
)
1
4c
0
\ln
(
R
2
( xx
0
)
2
+( y+y
0
)
2
)
+
1
4c
0
\ln
(
R
2
( x+x
0
)
2
+( y+y
0
)
2
)
4( x , y)=
\
4c
0
ln
(
( xx
0
)
2
+( yy
0
)
2
)
ln
(
( x+x
0
)
2
+( yy
0
)
2
)
ln (( xx
0
)
2
+( y+y
0
)
2
)+ln (( x+x
0
)
2
+( y+y
0
)
2
) |
To explicitly verify that the potential disappears at the boundary, we check the potential at x = 0
4( x , y)=
\
4c
0
ln
(
( x
0
)
2
+( yy
0
)
2
)
ln
(
( x
0
)
2
+( yy
0
)
2
)
ln
(
( x
0
)
2
+( y+y
0
)
2
)
+ln
(
( x
0
)
2
+( y+y
0
)
2
)
|
4( x=0, y)=0
and check the potential at y = 0
4( x , y)=
\
4c
0
ln
(
( xx
0
)
2
+( y
0
)
2
)
ln
(
( x+x
0
)
2
+( y
0
)
2
)
ln
(
( xx
0
)
2
+( y
0
)
2
)
+ln
(
( x+x
0
)
2
+( y
0
)
2
)
|
4( x , y=0)=0
The tangential electric field along the x-axis boundary is just E
x
:
E
x
=
4
x
at y = 0
E
x
=
\
4c
0
x
ln
(
( xx
0
)
2
+( yy
0
)
2
)
ln
(
( x+x
0
)
2
+( yy
0
)
2
)
ln(( xx
0
)
2
+( y+y
0
)
2
)+ln (( x+x
0
)
2
+( y+y
0
)
2
) |
E
x
=
\
4c
0
2( xx
0
)
( xx
0
)
2
+( yy
0
)
2
2( x+x
0
)
( x+x
0
)
2
+( yy
0
)
2
2( xx
0
)
( xx
0
)
2
+( y+y
0
)
2
+
2( x+x
0
)
( x+x
0
)
2
+( y+y
0
)
2
|
At y = 0:
E
x
=
\
4c
0
2( xx
0
)
( xx
0
)
2
+y
0
2
2( x+x
0
)
( x+x
0
)
2
+y
0
2
2( xx
0
)
( xx
0
)
2
+y
0
2
+
2( x+x
0
)
( x+x
0
)
2
+y
0
2
|
E
x
=0
at y = 0:
The tangential electric field along the y-axis boundary is just E
y
:
E
y
=
4
y
at x = 0
E
y
=
\
4c
0
y
ln
(
( xx
0
)
2
+( yy
0
)
2
)
ln
(
( x+x
0
)
2
+( yy
0
)
2
)
ln (( xx
0
)
2
+( y+y
0
)
2
)+ln (( x+x
0
)
2
+( y+y
0
)
2
) |
E
y
=
\
4c
0
2( yy
0
)
( xx
0
)
2
+( yy
0
)
2
2( yy
0
)
( x+x
0
)
2
+( yy
0
)
2
2( y+y
0
)
( xx
0
)
2
+( y+y
0
)
2
+
2( y+y
0
)
( x+x
0
)
2
+( y+y
0
)
2
|
At x = 0:
E
y
=
\
4c
0
2( yy
0
)
x
0
2
+( yy
0
)
2
2( yy
0
)
x
0
2
+( yy
0
)
2
2( y+y
0
)
x
0
2
+( y+y
0
)
2
+
2( y+y
0
)
x
0
2
+( y+y
0
)
2
|
E
y
=0
at x = 0
(b) Determine the surface charge density on the plane y = 0, x 0. Plot / versus x for
(x
0
= 2, y
0
= 1), (x
0
= 1, y
0
= 1), (x
0
= 1, y
0
= 2).
The surface charge density on an arbitrary surface creates an electric field discontinuity according to:
(E
2
E
1
)n=
1
c
0
u
|
n=n
0
For a conductor, the electric field below the surface is zero, E
1
= 0, and the electric field is normal to
the conductor's surface, and thus parallel to the conductor's normal, so that:
E
n
=
1
c
0
u
|
n=n
0
For this particular problem, the surface is the x-axis so that the normal is in the y direction
u=
c
0
E
y
|
y=0
We have already derived E
y
above and plug it directly in:
u=
\
4
2( yy
0
)
( xx
0
)
2
+( yy
0
)
2
2( yy
0
)
( x+x
0
)
2
+( yy
0
)
2
2( y+y
0
)
( xx
0
)
2
+( y+y
0
)
2
+
2( y+y
0
)
( x+x
0
)
2
+( y+y
0
)
2
|
|
y=0
u=
\
4
4( y
0
)
( xx
0
)
2
+y
0
2
+
4( y
0
)
( x+x
0
)
2
+y
0
2
|
u=
\ y
0
1
( xx
0
)
2
+y
0
2
1
( x+x
0
)
2
+y
0
2
|
For (x
0
= 2, y
0
= 1)
u
\
=
1
1
( x2)
2
+1
1
( x+2)
2
+1
|
For (x
0
= 1, y
0
= 1)
u
\
=
1
1
( x1)
2
+1
1
( x+1)
2
+1
|
For (x
0
= 1, y
0
= 2)
u
\
=
2
1
( x1)
2
+4
1
( x+1)
2
+4
|
(c) Show that the total charge (per unit length in z) on the plane y = 0, x 0 is
Q
x
=
2
\tan
1
(
x
0
y
0
)
What is the total charge on the plane x = 0?
To get the total charge on the plane y = 0 we just integrate over the charge density on the plane:
Q
x
=
u( x) dx
Q
x
=
\ y
0
1
( xx
0
)
2
+y
0
2
dx
1
( x+x
0
)
2
+y
0
2
dx
|
Q
x
=
\ y
0
x
0
1
x
2
+y
0
2
dx
x
0
1
x
2
+y
0
2
dx
|
Q
x
=
\ y
0
1
y
0
tan
1
(
x
y
0
)
|
x
0
1
y
0
tan
1
(
x
y
0
)
|
x
0
|
Q
x
=
\ y
0
2 y
0
1
y
0
tan
1
(
x
0
y
0
)
2 y
0
+
1
y
0
tan
1
(
x
0
y
0
)
|
Q
x
=
2
\tan
1
(
x
0
y
0
)
Due to the total symmetry between the x and y axes, the total charge on the x = 0 plane is:
Q
x
=
2
\tan
1
(
y
0
x
0
)
(d) Show that far from the origin [ >>
0
, where =
.x
2
+y
2
and
0
=
.
x
0
2
+y
0
2
] the leading term in the
potential is
4-4
asym
=
4\
c
0
( x
0
y
0
)( xy)
p
4
Interpret.
The potential was found above to be:
4( x , y)=
\
4c
0
ln
(
( xx
0
)
2
+( yy
0
)
2
)
ln
(
( x+x
0
)
2
+( yy
0
)
2
)
ln (( xx
0
)
2
+( y+y
0
)
2
)+ln (( x+x
0
)
2
+( y+y
0
)
2
) |
Put this potential in cylindrical coordinates (, , z):
4( x , y)=
\
4c
0
ln
(
p
2
+p
0
2
2pp
0
cos(00
0
)
)
ln
(
p
2
+p
0
2
+2pp
0
cos(0+0
0
)
)
ln( p
2
+p
0
2
2 pp
0
cos(0+0
0
))+ln( p
2
+p
0
2
+2pp
0
cos(00
0
)) |
Divide everything by
2
so that we can get everything in terms of
0
/ and then we are able to make a
statement about being far away from the origin:
4( x , y)=
\
4c
0
ln( p
2
)+ln
(
1+
(
p
0
p
)
2
2
p
0
p
cos(00
0
)
)
ln(p
2
)ln
(
1+
(
p
0
p
)
2
+2
p
0
p
cos(0+0
0
)
)
ln(p
2
)ln
(
1+
(
p
0
p
)
2
2
p
0
p
cos(0+0
0
)
)
+ln (p
2
)+ln
(
1+
(
p
0
p
)
2
+2
p
0
p
cos(00
0
)
)
|
4( x , y)=
\
4c
0
ln
(
1+
(
p
0
p
)
2
2
p
0
p
cos(00
0
)
)
ln
(
1+
(
p
0
p
)
2
+2
p
0
p
cos(0+0
0
)
)
ln
(
1+
(
p
0
p
)
2
2
p
0
p
cos(0+0
0
)
)
+ln
(
1+
(
p
0
p
)
2
+2
p
0
p
cos(00
0
)
)
|
Expand each term in a Taylor series using ln (1+x)=xx
2
/ 2+x
3
/ 3+...
4( x , y)=
\
4c
0
(
p
0
p
)
2
2
p
0
p
cos(00
0
)
|
(1/ 2)
(
p
0
p
)
2
2
p
0
p
cos(00
0
)
|
2
+F
1
( x
3
, x
4
,...)
(
p
0
p
)
2
+2
p
0
p
cos(0+0
0
)
|
+(1/ 2)
(
p
0
p
)
2
+2
p
0
p
cos(0+0
0
)
|
2
+F
2
( x
3
, x
4
,...)
(
p
0
p
)
2
2
p
0
p
cos(0+0
0
)
|
+(1/ 2)
(
p
0
p
)
2
2
p
0
p
cos(0+0
0
)
|
2
+F
3
( x
3
, x
4
,...)
+
(
p
0
p
)
2
+2
p
0
p
cos(00
0
)
|
(1/ 2)
(
p
0
p
)
2
+2
p
0
p
cos(00
0
)
|
2
+F
4
( x
3
, x
4
,...) |
Most of the first few terms cancel out when expanded:
4( x , y)=
\
4c
0
4
(
p
0
p
)
2
(cos
2
(0+0
0
)cos
2
(00
0
))
+F
1
( x
3
, x
4
, ...)+F
2
( x
3
, x
4
,...)+F
3
( x
3
, x
4
, ...)+F
4
( x
3
, x
4
,...)|
Far away from the origin we have >>
0
and therefore
0
/<<1. This means that (
0
/)
3
and (
0
/)
4
etc.
are negligible compared to (
0
/)
2
and they can all be dropped.
4( x , y)=
\
4c
0
4
(
p
0
p
)
2
(cos
2
(0+0
0
)cos
2
(00
0
))
4( x , y)=
\
c
0
(
p
0
p
)
2
(4 cos0cos0
0
sin0sin0
0
)
4( x , y)=
4\
c
0
( x
0
y
0
)( x y)
p
4
This is the quadrupole term, which makes sense because there are four line charges.