Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Trade equilibrium 6. Wages 7. Opportunity cost 8. Gains from trade: big versus small countries
Foreign:
X Y
f
= a f Lxf
f = b f Ly
Assumptions: A1. Production functions (technology) differ across countries. A2. 1 factor of production (labour) i.e. no difference in relative endowments A3. Constant returns to scale (i.e. labour efficiency is independent of output) A4. Identical and homogenous tastes in all countries A5. Absence of distortions (tariffs, taxes, subsidies etc.) A2, A3 => linear PPF
2. Absolute Advantage Definition 1 Country H has an absolute advantage in production of X if ah > af. Country H has an absolute advantage in production of Y if bh > bf. Example 1 1 unit of labour produces (MPl): Home X Y a=20 b =20 Foreign af =30 b f=10 Absolute advantage Foreign (20<30) Home (20>10)
4
->H specializes in Y, F specializes in X Changes in output as a result of reallocation of 1 unit of labour: H: 1 worker moves from X to Y F: 1 worker moves from Y to X Home Foreign Change in world output +10 +10
X Y
a=-20 b=+20
af =+30 b f=-10
3. Comparative Advantage Definition 2 Country H has a comparative advantage in the production of X if ah/bh > af/bf. Country H has a comparative advantage in the production of Y if ah/ b h < a f/b f. Example 2 1 unit of labour produces (MPl):
Comparative a/ b advantage =1
Foreign worker is 3 times more efficient at producing X => 3 home workers can be replaced by 1 foreign worker Is trade welfare improving? Yes! Changes in output as a result of reallocation of labour: H: 3 L moves from X to Y F: 1 L moves from Y to X Home Foreign Change in world output +15 +5
8
X Y
If ratios of marginal products differ for 2 countries, there are gains from specialization
We will show that comparative advantage gives rise to autarky price differences between home and foreign countries, which in turn make trade beneficial to both countries.
4. Production possibility frontier and autarky equilibrium Let C- cheese, V wine. V = aLv C = bLc L = Lv + Lc (a, b - MPL of labour in wine and cheese sectors)
10
Wine (V)
v = aL
Home
Ah
PPFh
c = bL
Cheese (C)
a v a L = = c b L b
I = pc C + p vV ->
ECON 3150 2. Ricardian Model 11
Budget line:
a Pc = = Pv b
Relative prices = 1/ relative productivities Higher b (productivity in cheese sector) => lower relative price of cheese (<=>higher relative price of wine).
12
Higher a (productivity in wine sector) => lower relative price of wine (<=>higher relative price of cheese). Autarky prices reflect comparative advantage: a The more efficient is the economy at producing wine ( b is higher), the lower is the relative price of wine and the higher is the relative price of cheese ( PP is higher).
cheese wine
=> Comparative advantage gives rise to differences in autarky prices: P P =>H, F will gain from trade.
H F
P* - world price (countries trade at P*) 3 cases: 1. i.e. Fs relative price of cheese is higher (= home relative price of cheese is lower) H specializes in cheese:
P >P
14
Wine (V)
v =a L
h h
P* PPFh=Pa C*
Ah
Q*
c = b h Lh
Cheese (C)
Note: countries will specialize completely to maximize the value of domestic output at world price:
15
Wine (V)
v = a h Lh
P* PPF =P
h h
Value of Ah at P*
Value of Q* at P*
Ah
Value of Ah at Ph
Q*
c = b h Lh
Cheese (C)
16
2. i.e. Fs relative price of wine is higher (= home relative price of wine is lower) H specializes in wine:
Wine (V)
v = a h Lh
P <P
Q*
C* Ah P*
PPFh=Pa
c = b h Lh
Cheese (C)
17
3. P =P
Q* Exports of Wine
Ah=C*
PPFh=Pa= P*
Cheese (C)
Imports of Cheese
c =b L
18
i.e. no comparative advantage exists => no gains from trade!!! CA is necessary to gain from trade
Ricardian model predicts complete specialization: each country completely specializes in the good in which it has comparative advantage 2 countries, with 2 prices: p , p , For equilibrium to occur, P* should lie between
h f
Ph , P f
Why?
19
h f P , P If P*> -> both countries would want to export cheese, no equilibrium h f P , P If P*< -> both countries would want to export wine, no equilibrium
6. Wages Nominal Wages w nominal wage Wage=value of marginal product of labour = Price* MPL:
20
wv = Pv a ; wc = Pc b .
If Wc>Ww -> everyone will work in cheese industry, economy specializes in cheese If Wc<Ww -> everyone will work in wine industry, economy specializes in wine What if there is no trade, and a country has to produce both goods for itself, it has to be that Wc=Ww=W. (Note: if both goods are produced, nominal wages are equal in 2 sectors:
ECON 3150 2. Ricardian Model 21
wwine = wcheese Pwine a = Pcheese b a Pcheese = . b Pwine which is the same result as on page 5) Real Wages
w w w p - real wage; pv - real wage in terms of wine; pc - real wage in terms of cheese ( e.g. wage=$100, price of cheese=$10 => a worker can buy 10 units of cheese)
ECON 3150 2. Ricardian Model 22
* w = P va ; Then nominal wage in wine sector is: v Real wages are constant in terms of exported good. If a country exports wine at price P , then home nominal wages are w * wwine = Pwine a . Real wages in terms of wine are P * = a - same wine as in autarky.
* wine
24
w
* Pcheese
How does it compare to real wages in terms of cheese in w =b ? autarky Pcheese w h Pwine w a = h = h h P Pcheese P In autarky cheese h Pwine
25
I.e. real wage in terms of imported good (cheese) is higher in free trade than in autarky.
26
Autarky Home Real wage in terms of wine Real wage in terms of cheese Foreign Real wage in terms of winei Real wage in terms of cheese
Trade
a b(= Pa )
h
= <
a
a p*
af(= P b )
f f
< =
p *b f
bf
bf
27
All workers gain real income in moving from autarky to free trade (b/c all workers consume both wine and cheese) More productive economies (higher a, b) enjoy higher wages under free trade
Comparative advantage => direction of trade Absolute advantage => differences in real wages: larger a or b=> larger real wages in terms of both goods.
(Note that for this conclusion we need complete specialization: this allows us to pin down the real wage in terms of exported good.)
28
7. Opportunity cost
Comparative advantage can be stated in terms of opportunity costs, rather than MPL. Definition 3 Opportunity cost of good Y in terms of good X is equal to the amount of good X a country has to sacrifice to produce 1 more unit of Y. In example (2), opportunity cost of 1 unit of Y is 1 unit of X at home, and 3 units of X abroad. => H has lower opportunity cost of Y => H has CA in Y, and F has CA in X.
29
Comparative a/ b advantage =1
30
8. Gains from trade: big versus small countries Assume home country is small, and foreign country is large (e.g. Canada and the USA). As foreign country grows, it increases supply of its exports, and demand for its imports. When a large country grows economically, its PPF expands => country produces more of exported good and wants to consume more of imported good.
Definition: Terms of Trade: ratio of the price of an export commodity to the price of an import commodity
31
C1 C0
As large country grows, its demand for imported good grows and its supply of exports grows. Small exporter cannot satisfy all demand of the growing large country. So price of imports of the large country increases: the large country suffers deterioration in its terms of trade. The small country faces improvement in its terms of trade (its exports become more expensive).
ECON 3150 2. Ricardian Model
32
Excess demand has linear segments (feature of Ricardian model): at autarky prices countries are indifferent between exporting and importing. Excess demand for X is downward-sloping: lower P* gives incentive to import X, higher P* gives incentive to export X.
33
P*
Pha
Eh
P*
PPa
Ef
a f
-(Xc-Xp)
Foreign Exports
0 =
Domestic Imports
(Xc-Xp)
34
B Eh
P*
P*
Ef
Ef
-(Xc-Xp)
Foreign Exports
0 =
Domestic Imports
(Xc-Xp)
Before growth: at P* small country H imports X (AB), which is equal to CA= Fs exports. After growth in F, at P* F wants to supply exports of X=DA, but H wants to import only AB (as
ECON 3150 2. Ricardian Model
35
before). Because DA is larger than AB, F oversupplies its exports. To bring the market into equilibrium P* has to fall to P*. H experiences improvement in its terms of trade. Small H gains more and more from trade:
Y
Small Country Gains from Growth in Large Trading Partner
u* u*
P*
P* Hs PPF X
36
Implications: 1. Small countries are likely to be major gainers from free trade. 2. Countries may benefit from growth in their trading partners.
i
Foreign country exports cheese and imports wine. Real wage in terms of cheese in F is bf. What are the real wages in terms of wine (imported good)?
wf * Pwine
wf = af ? f Pwine
w
f Pcheese w bf = f = = Pfbf In autarky f 1 Pwine Pwine f Pf Pcheese f
> Pfbf
37