Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Samples
From sewing factories, 43 kinds of thread for mens suiting and ten kinds of thread for ladies dresses, in all 53 kinds of commercial thread, were chosen, as shown in Table I. Among these commercial samples of threads, several were recommended as good thread for sewing by apparel manufacturers.
1,000
Fb
F(gf)
500 200
Fy
ey
0 0
10
15 e (per cent)
20
25
eb
20
Number of samples 43
Fibre Polyester (15) Silk (2) Nylon (2) Polyester (13) Cotton (4) PET/Cotton (1) Polyester (5) PET/Cotton (1) Polyester (1) Polyester (9)
Thread count tex 15-27 22-25 17-27 24-44 29-38 33 20-31 38 24 21-34
Spun (18)
Core spun (6) Ladys thin dress 10 Filament (1) Spun (9)
Note: Number of samples shown in parentheses Table I. Machine Threads Samples for Lock-stitch
thread was stretched five to eight times at the same place. Taking this into account, tensile property up to 200 gf was measured seven times repeatedly. Figure 2 shows this curve and it is evident from this figure that the difference between the first and second cycles is clear, but less distinct between the sixth and seventh cycles. For the increase of the tensile time, the residual strain is higher. On the first cycle, tensile strain, linearity of tensile, tensile energy and tensile resilience were defined as EM, LT,
Properties Tensile Break Repeated tension (maximum load Fmax = 200 gf) Bending
Conditions
Sample length: 10 cm Strain rate: 0.04%/sec. Maximum load (Fmax): 200 gf Repetitive time: 7 cycles Sample length: 10 cm Strain rate: 0.02%/sec. Sample length: 1 cm Maximum curvature:2.5 cm1 Rate of bending curvature: 0.5 cm1/sec. Thread tension: 150 gf Moving rate of the needle: 1 cm/sec Moving stroke of the needle: 1 cm
Friction
200 Sample: No.01(Silk 100%, 22tex)
First cycle
100
F(gf)
0 0 200 1
EM e (per cent)
2
WT and RT[9] respectively. On the seventh cycle, the residual strain was defined as R7. These five parameters were chosen. Bending Property Figure 3 shows the bending moment-curvature curve. Bending stiffness and hysteresis per thread were chosen and defined as B and 2HB[9] respectively. Frictional Property The frictional property between the needle and the thread was measured by the device as shown by Figure 4. On the handy compression tester[10], the needle and the thread eyelet were
F(gf)
100
Seventh cycle
R7
0 0 1
e (per cent)
21
PF1
M(g cm/thread)
0.0050 -
F= PF1-PF2 PF2
Sample: No.1(PE 22tex)
0.0025 -
1 2HB 0
K(cm1)
0.0025 -
PF (gf)
Tensile (Maximum load, Fmax=200 gf) log EM tensile strain at Fmax LT linearity log WT tensile energy RT tensile resilience log R7 residual strain at 7th cycle Bending log B log 2HB Friction PF1 bending stiffness bending hysteresis
friction force between thread and needle FF difference of descending and ascending friction forces Number of samples: n = 53
0.0050 -
Mean
0 2 4 6 Deformation (cm) 8 10
set, and a weight of 150 grams was hung on it so as to produce tension equal to the tension given to machine thread. The stroke and speed of the needle were established at 1 cm and 1 cm/sec respectively. Figure 5 shows the frictional curve. For example, in the case of thread sample No. 1, by attaching the weight, the force points out about 300 gf. The needle motion starts, and at the point of penetration, maximum value, designated as PF1, is reached. At the point of withdrawal, minimum value, designated as PF2, is reached. The difference between PF1 and PF2 was designated as FF. One cycle consisted of five repetitions of penetration and withdrawal, as this is the friction given to actual sewing thread. The
SD Maximum Minimum UNIT
gf % gf % % gf cm % %
gf cm2 gf cm gf gf
22
G2-1 tex Tensile Break Fy ey Fb eb Fmax = 200 gf EM LT WT RT R7 Bending B BS 2HB Friction PF1 FF 23 138 3.10 872 17.10 6.8 0.978 6.70 41.6 3.00 0.80 1.20 0.80 413 140
P1 24 180 2.50 1090 19.00 3.6 0.939 3.45 67.6 0.75 1.81 2.80 1.97 435 172
No. 39 No. 07 No. 33 30 171 3.01 1035 20.68 5.5 1.077 5.86 43.3 1.83 1.19 1.97 1.56 415 145 30 260 1.83 1263 14.07 2.0 0.782 1.55 85.3 0.53 1.60 2.29 1.38 430 168 28
200
First cycle
252 2.43 1439 17.77 2.4 0.722 1.72 77.7 0.64 1.97 3.02 2.09 436 174
F (gf)
100
Seventh cycle
0 0
e (per cent)
200
First cycle
F (gf)
100
Seventh cycle
0 0
e (per cent)
continued to be used. The other is not suitable for sewing, and its use was stopped. The tensile curves of the two are shown in Figure 6. Sample G2-1 is the former thread and sample P1 is the latter. Breaking load and strain of sample P1 are larger than sample G2-1 as shown in Figure 6. The curve of repeated tensile properties for both threads is considerably different, as shown in Figure 7.
1,500
1,000
n
The value of tensile, bending and frictional properties of the two are shown in Table IV and plotted on the data chart as shown in Figure 8. The breaking load, yielding load and breaking strain of the suitable thread is smaller by one sigma than the mean, but yielding strain is greater by one sigma than the mean. EM, LT, WT and R7 are different for both and the suitable thread is considered softer than the unsuitable
F (gf)
500
Sample: G2-1 (PET 100 per cent spun, 23tex) 0 0 5 10 e (per cent) 15 20
23
Tension of needle thread (g) MJ MB MS MP* 145 130 140 140 200 80 90 90 90 110 60 63 100 60 80 85 95 83 95 95
* Presumed value
thread. The bending properties of these are not very different. The frictional force of the suitable thread is smaller than that of the unsuitable thread. In another example, the mechanical and frictional properties of three commercial threads which are suitable for sewing (sample No. 39 thread was judged by a thread maker in England, the others were judged by Japanese apparel makers) are shown in Table VI and plotted on the data chart as shown in Figure 9. Tensile property of No. 39 thread is similar to the suitable thread sample G2-1 as shown in Figure 8. Bending stiffness of this thread is higher than that of sample G2-1 because of its thickness. Frictional properties are similar to sample G2-1 as shown above. This thread is considered a soft thread. In contrast with this, the other sample, No. 33 thread made in Japan, was hard to stretch and
Ladys dress SHINGOSENa New silky A log EL log BS log SS EP log BP log SP T W AIR
a b c
3
60 1 70
(Xm)/S 0
200
1
250 3 1,500 300
2
350 400 4
3
500 5 2,000 40 50 60
4
600
500 5 6
(Fmax = 200gf)
20
30
EM* LT WT* RT
R7* Bending
0.4 0.5 0 0.05 10 0.1
1 0.5 1 20 0.2
1.5
4 1
10 1.5
2 40 50 60
4 70
5 80 2 90 3
10 100 4 5 110
20 120 10
30
B*
2HB* Friction
0.001 0.001
0.002 0.002
PF1 FF
370
380 100
390
400
410
420 150
430
470
480
490 250
G2-1,
P1
Figure 8. The Data Chart Plotting Mechanical and Frictional Parameter of the Thread for Ladys Dress
Mens summer suiting SIRO spunb C 3.56 0.0481 0.822 0.338 0.1244 13.795 0.369 14.3 0.184 Wool/polyester blendc D 2.37 0.1163 2.745 0.189 0.2395 14.965 0.449 6.7 0.508
New worsted B 5.569 0.1135 0.615 0.484 0.2634 5.376 0.732 7.8 0.069
24
(Xm)/S
Fy*
70 1
200
250 300 3
350 400 4
500 5 2,000
600
Puckering value
3
1 2 3 4
500 5 6
1,500 20 30 40
(Fmax = 200gf)
50
60
EM* LT WT* RT
R7* Bending
0.4 0.5 0 0.05 10 0.1
1 0.5 1 20 0.2
1.5
4 1
10 1.5
2 40 50 60
4 70
5 80 2 90 3
10 100 4 5 110
2.0 120 10
MJ
30
MB MS Machine type
MP
B*
2HB* Friction
3 Puckering value
PF1 FF
370
380 100
390
400
410
420 150
430
470
480
490 250
No.39,
No.07,
No.33
Figure 9. The Data Chart Plotting Mechanical and Frictional Parameter of the Thread for Mens Suiting
MJ
MB MS Machine type
G2-1 P1
MP
Thread sample:
had smaller strain than the thread made in England. Both of them were hard to bend and their frictional force was larger than the thread made in England. These threads are considered hard threads. Here, the definition of a soft thread is a thread which has low elastic modulus and large residual strain, low bending rigidity, low frictional force, and the definition of hard thread is thread which has high elastic modulus and small residual strain, high bending rigidity, high frictional force.
Figure 10. Effect of Machine and Thread on Puckering Value Which Shows Mean Puckering Value and Standard Deviation
Sewing Experiments
Because the best condition of thread tension varies with the machine type, in this article four types of machine, MJ, MB, MP and MS, were used. In Table V, the interrelation between thread
tension used in this experiment and machine types is shown. The thread tension was measured by two measurement tools, named Somfy Tec, made in France. The maximum measurement loads of the two are 100 gf and 500 gf, and accuracy of measurement are 2 gf and 10 gf respectively. The thread tension for the MJ type of machine was highest. Four fabric samples, SHINGOSEN New Silky type, New Worsted type, Wool/PET blend and SIRO spun, were chosen and their mechanical properties are shown in Table VI. Fabric length (warp direction) is 30 cm and width (weft direction) is 10 cm. The fabric sample is folded in two and sewn at a distance of 1 cm from its end along the warp direction. The distance between the two marks on the fabric is 20 cm. The sewing speed is 1,000-1,500 rpm. An Organ needle, size 11, was used. These four fabric samples were sewn by the threads mentioned above using four types of machine. After that the seam shrinkage was measured by auto measure tester[11] and the seam pucker was evaluated using a standard model which rates seam puckering as grade 0 (no pucker), grade 1
25
threads were expressed by closed symbols. Seam pucker was strongly influenced by the type of machine, and the effect of thread property on the seam pucker is different for each machine.
Conclusions
MJ MB MS Machine type MP
(1) Commercial sewing threads have a wide range of mechanical properties. (2) Every apparel factory has a different opinion about the best sewing thread. But there are mainly two types of opinion about good threads, a soft type of thread and a hard type thread. (3) Experiments were carried out by using different types of machines for lock-stitch. Seam pucker was strongly influenced by the type of sewing machine, and the effect of thread property on pucker is different for each machine. There may be an optimum thread for each type of machine. (4) Needle-thread tension of the sewingmachine must be adjusted to obtain the optimum seam. It has been found that serious seam pucker occurred with the sewing-machine where the optimum needlethread tension was high. For such sewingmachines, hard thread is more suitable than soft thread for reducing pucker. In the case of machines for which the lower thread tension is the best condition, soft thread is more suitable than hard thread.
MJ
MB MS Machine type
MP
MJ
MB MS Machine type
No.39 No.07
MP
Thread sample:
No.33
Figure 11. Effect of the Machine and Thread on Puckering Value Which Shows Mean Puckering Value and Standard Deviation
References
1. Shimazaki, K., Studies on Seam Strength Tensile Strength of Seam Sewed by Hand, Japanese Resource Association of Textile End-Uses, Vol. 20, 1979, p. 317. 2. Matsuo. M. and Aoki, I., Study on the Seam Strength Prediction of the Tensile Strength of a Curved Seam, Japanese Resource Association of Textile End-Uses, Vol. 22, 1981, p. 191. 3. Utiyama, S., Mori, Y., Yamamoto, T. and Noshi, H., An Experimental Study of Seam Strength, Japanese Resource Association of Textile End-Uses, Vol. 20, 1979, p. 153. 4. Kawakami, K. and Masuda, Y., Studies on Mens Homewear (Part 6) The Tensile Strength of Seat Seams, Annual Reports of
(modest pucker), grade 2 (normal pucker), grade 3 (serious pucker), and grade 4 (very serious pucker)[12]. This experiment was carried out to achieve as good a seam as possible for each machine and thread.
Results
Seam shrinkage has a close relation to the evaluated Puckering Value. So the results of this experiment were expressed by using Puckering Value as shown in Figures 10 and 11, which show the interrelation between machine type and Puckering Value for each thread; the soft threads were expressed by open symbols, the hard
26
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
Studies, Osaka Joshigakuen Junior College, No. 24, 1980. Amirbayat, J., Profile of Lock-stitch Seams: A Theoretical Study, Textile Resource Journal, Vol. 61, 1991, p. 119. Ajiki, I., Analysis of Seam Structure by Mechanical Model On the Good Stitch, Japanese Resource Association of Textile End-Uses, Vol. 27, 1986, p. 208. Iwasaki, K. and Tanaka, M., The Fatigue of Sewing Thread by Tensile and Bending Stress, Annual Report of the Science of Living, Osaka City University, Osaka. Jojima, E., Kusakabe, A. and Mashima, T., Effect of High-speed Sewing on the Thread, Proceedings of the Jissen Womens University Department of Home Economics , Vol. 23, 1986, p. 33. Kawabata, S., Niwa, M. and Matsudaira, M., Characterization of Mechanical Properties of the Yarns Produced by New Spinning and the Effect of the Yarn Properties on Fabric
Handle, Proceedings of the 13th Textile Research Symposium at Mt Fuji, Vol. 36, 1984. 10. Kawabata, S., Analysis of Fabric Hand of High-quality Apparel Fabrics on the Basis of Objective Evaluation Technique and the Design and Development of the Highperformance Fabrics, Research Project, Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Co-operation Research, The Textile Machinery Society of Japan, Vol. 156, 1987. 11. Shiomi, S., Niwa, M. and Kawabata, S., Prediction of the Shrinkage Recovery of Fabrics after Steam Pressing Part 2: Practical Use of the Prediction Theory, Seni-Gakkaishi, Vol. 32, 1979, p. T1. 12. Yamada, Y. and Niwa, M., A Study on Seam Puckering Part 1: The Effect of the Basic Mechanical Properties on Seam Puckering in Fabrics for Mens Suits, Japanese Resource Association of Textile End-Uses, Vol. 34, 1992, p. 142.
27