Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Faculty can keep multimedia products copyrighted work of others for two years of educational
use. Once this time has passed, permission must be granted by creator. The Fair Use Guidelines
for Educational Multimedia make it accessible and easy for students and educators to use small
amounts of multimedia products, without permission or payment to the publisher.
Limitations:
• An article, 2,500 words.
• A longer work of prose, the limit is 1,000 words, or 10% of the work, whichever is less.
• A poem, 250 words
• A longer poem, an excerpt of no more than 250 words may be used.
• No more than one chart, diagram, cartoon or picture from a book, periodical, or newspaper.
• No more than one work is copied from a single author,
• No more than three authors are copied from a single collective work (such as an anthology)
• No more than nine instances of multiple copying occur during a single term or semester
• You may not put copies into collective works, also known as anthologies. This violates the
right of the copyright holder to make "derivative works."
• Consumable works" such as, workbooks or standardized tests, should not be copied.
Conditions:
• The copying must be done at the initiative of the teacher (at the moment of inspiration) and at
a time when it is unreasonable to get permission from the copyright owner.
• Only one copy is made for each student.
• No charge is made to the student except to recover only the cost of copying.
• The copying is done for only one course.
• The same item is not reproduced from term to term.
• With respect to newspapers and periodicals, you can copy as many times as you want, while
still keeping within the word limits discussed earlier.
• It is only if you do not have time to seek a publisher's reprint, or get permission that it is fair
use to make copies for students.
When an educator presents an AV work to students that is termed as Performance and Display.
Fair Use comes into play when an educator perceives the need to copy a portion of an AV work
to be used in an instructional situation. The 1976 Copyright Act provides for teachers to perform
AV works to students in a face-to-face teaching situation, additionally, the performance of the
AV work must meet the instructional objective and the AV work must be a “lawfully made”
copy.
Performance and Display of AV works was only allowed in face-to-face teaching, however, the
recent passing of the Teach Act in November 2002 has enabled the digital transmission of AV
works under certain conditions.
The TEACH Act also requires that the non-profit facility have policies in place that govern the
use of copyrighted materials. It is up to the educator to have information about copyright, and the
fair use of materials and their performance or display. Teachers must provide a notice to students
that materials used in this course may be subject to copyright protection. This could be handled
as simply as placement of an easily seen and obvious notice in a syllabus for an online course.
The TEACH Act law is not a resolution to copyrighting problem for education but it is a step in
the right direction with appropriate guidelines that make teaching more interactive and
interesting to the student by making the audio-digital world available.
The TEACH Act is important for all education to become familiar with. As a future teacher I can
see myself using this a guidelines to make sure all my teaching material is copyright safe. The
TEACH Act guidelines should be put into practice with every audio-digital tool educators may
want to use. This shows great responsibility and peer modeling for all educators alike.
· Students may borrow these materials and make single copies on machines that are
plainly marked with notices citing protection of the works under the Copyright Act. The
students, as users of self-service photocopiers, are held accountable for any copyright
violations.
Educators have increasingly used practice of placing journal articles in electronic reserve.
Electronic reserve is when educators digitized an article in the program of a course by putting a
hyperlink to the article on a web page (a "virtual reserve room"), and restricting access to the
article to students enrolled in a course to which the article is directly applicable. One area that
educators have issues with making copies is in the creation of a coursepacks. Coursepacks may
be an issue that falls under the category of making multiple copies. Materials placed in a
coursepack may probably have to meet fair use guidelines for multiple classroom copies for
which there are...
1. Limitations for brevity.
3. The copying should be done by and within a non-profit educational setting. (absolutely
not by a for-profit agency).
5. The college attorney should be consulted to clear up questions of ambiguity (which are
legion).
6. The best solution may be to place the materials that would otherwise go in a coursepack
on reserve in the library.
Educators have broad copying privileges under fair use, but not unlimited privileges. Educators
need to remember that the coping is to be used for research and other scholastic pursuits as well
as placement in the reserve room of the library for access by students.
The single coping guidelines are important to have in practice as educators. It can be easy for an
educator to get carried away with making copies that would break the guidelines. As a future
teacher it is great to have these guidelines available to use as a rule book when making single
copies of any work to be used in the classroom with students. It is great to know that these
guidelines do exist and need to be made aware of for all educators.