SUSAN HERBERT

Plaintiff-Appellant

Versus

BARACK OBAMA, JOHN ROBERTS

AND THE US
Defendants-Appellees.

-------------------------
On Appeal from the United States District Court for the
Middle District of Florida

BEFORE: BLACK, CARNES, and MARCUS, Circuit Judges.

BY THE COURT:

On the Court's own motion, this appeal is hereby DISMISSED as frivolous

and

entirely without merit. See 11th Cir. R. 42-4. Appellant's "Motion to Exceed

Page/Word Limitations" is DENIED AS MOOT. (Dated August 3rd, 2009).

MOTION TO RECONSIDER

MOTION TO RECONSIDER YOUR OWN DESTINY AND FATE THAT

IS:

1
Appellant motions this court to reconsider sentencing their own persons to
the death penalty upon a charge of treason which will eventually come about
as "stupid" like "ignorant" is not an excuse under our law: I entered this
court already having won my case and this court has acted upon one
criminal idea alone: This court truly believes that the people will keep
putting up with this unconstitutional garbage, YOU AND YOUR IN
VIOLATION OF THE LAW ACTIONS, if only you, the illegally sitting
federal court, can stop the people from knowing. This court does not possess
that power either under US law or in this universe as that power is reserved
for the exactly named Creator. This court cannot DISMISS or render MOOT
what is inalienable and has been granted to We, the people thus I by the
Creator and then the Founders as they placed it in writing. It always was and
always will be mine as long as I do not allow criminal judges to steal it or to
run away and hide when they finally meet their match, a woman who is their
better as she has all of the legal power and the moral authority you do not as
crooks are not legal and moral by their very natures. Knowledge you need to
process and own to then reconsider your own case not mine IF you wish to
escape the penalty of death exactly named for the crime known as treason
within our Constitution:

1. I am seeking to restore original jurisdiction. O.J. is not the right of a court

to hear the case - I only let you believe that I am stupid as o.j. is the right of
the people to FIRE the trustees of the corporation for violating the trust. It is
our inalienable right to dissolve you and abolish you. This would be exactly
worded and a math problem as outlined in the following, my original
thought but taken from a website and a group of lawyers calling themselves
TeamLaw as we have been working on this simultaneously so I discovered

2
them after I made my case as I knew you would underestimate me as that is
the fatal mistake all traitors make thus I sought out people who could and
would support my case and my application of the law in light of the actual
not made up or wholly denied historical facts 9The Declaration? Fact and
law. The constitution? Fact and law. Marbury v Madison? Fact and law. The
Action known as 11/20/08? Fact and law as Roberts action proves me to be
me the living embodiment of the law in both letter or President and spirit or
Commander:

“Historical Review: In 1993 we discovered the original jurisdiction State

Governors’ seats were vacant. I (Eric William Madsen) ran for office in
Colorado; and in 1994, I was elected Governor by Colorado’s Electors. I
lawfully accepted the election and was seated in the original jurisdiction
Governor’s seat. At that same time, Roy Romer was elected as Governor
of the more commonly recognized private corporation known as, “The
State of Colorado” (Corp. State). The Corp. State courts then started to
subpoena me to come and testify as the Governor of the original
jurisdiction Republic State. I responded to most those subpoenas and so
testified. After finding it next to impossible to beat us in court, the Corp.
State’s sub-corporation, Arapaho County, determined that if they could get
funding from the United States Congress they could possibly beat us. On
review, Congress sent the matter to the National Security Council who
handed the matter over to the Military’s Joint Chiefs for review. About
two weeks later, the Chief of the Joint Chiefs responded, “What
Governor Madsen is doing out their in Colorado is legal, lawful and
correct; and, if they accomplish what they have set out to do we will
recognize that President of The United States of America as the
President of The United States of America, Commander in Chief of
the military and give them full military support.”

Though the National Security Council is purely an advisory committee, having

no legislative or judicial effect; the fact remains, they recognized the truth and
responded with it to Congress who sent the supplicants away without funding;
after that, the Corp. State started to leave us alone. The Corp. State and its
courts, the United States 10th District Court, the United States Congress, the
United States National Security Council and the Joint Chiefs of the United
States of America’s military all recognized, reviewed and accepted my election
as the original jurisdiction Governor of Colorado.

3
After serving as Colorado’s original jurisdiction Governor for four years, I was
lawfully appointed to The United States of America’s original jurisdiction
Senate, so I retired from the Governor’s Office having served a full term. The
next original jurisdiction Governor of Colorado, Robert Shell, followed me into
Office and confirmed my appointment to the original jurisdiction Senate. From
around the country, 41 other Governors have since been elected in their
respective offices. Other Senators were seated as I was and I was elected by
them as the original jurisdiction Senate’s President pro tempore, where I still
serve. Still, we have work enough to do in the gigantic task of reseating our
nation’s Republic State Governors in their original jurisdiction seats. This year
(2007) we are hoping to elect three more governors.

An original jurisdiction Republic State Governor, can appoint and seat

that State’s original jurisdiction National Senators, who can in turn elect
and seat an original jurisdiction President of the United States of
America, which has not been done since 1913. Until I was elected, the
States had not had Governors seated since at least 1968. The main reason
you see the problems our nation faces today is the people have forgotten what
our actual government is and they instead act as if these private foreign
controlled corporations (Corp. U.S. and the Corp. States) are their
government. It’s why the States are not using our national money system. It’s
why we are caught up in wars and rumors of war. It is why Corp. U.S. is
exactly following the pattern set in Adolf Hitler’s Germany, most recently by
setting up a national personal identification system and the “Homeland
Security Police” system after the pattern of Hitler’s “State Security Police” the
dreaded SS! [An aside: I witnessed genocide born here, in the US, at a
political rally. I reported it over two years ago as now I own an answer that has
eluded us: how, what, when and why a genocide is born and not one person
acts to stop it. It is a secret of this world I never wanted to learn but I did and
you acted exactly like the SS Officers: I contacted you and you ignored me and
pretended none of this is happening as they did when early witnesses at
Auschwitz reported atrocities...Bush’s LAWYER’s memos as they are not his
work didn’t wake you up? – Susan] Historical Outline: 1st: Martial Law is
declared by President Lincoln on April 24th, 1863, with General Orders No.
100; under martial law authority, Congress and President Lincoln institute
continuous martial law by ordering the states (people) either conscribe troops
and or provide money in support of the North or be recognized as enemies of
the nation; this martial law Act of Congress is still in effect today. This martial
law authority gives the President (with or without Congress) the dictatorial
authority to do anything that can be done by government in accord with the
Constitution of the United States of America. This conscription act remains in
effect to this very day and is the foundation of Presidential Executive Orders
authority; it was magnified in 1917 with The Trading with the Enemy Act (Public
Law 65-91, 65th Congress, Session I, Chapters 105, 106, October 6, 1917).
and again in 1933 with the Emergency War Powers Act, which is ratified and

4
enhanced almost every year to this date by Congress. Today these Acts
address the people of the United States themselves as their enemy.

2nd: The District of Columbia Organic Act of 1871 created a “municipal

corporation” to govern the District of Columbia. Considering the fact that the
municipal government itself was incorporated in 1808, an “Organic Act” (first
Act) using the term “municipal corporation” in 1871 can only mean a private
corporation owned by the municipality. Hereinafter we will call that private
corporation, “Corp. U.S.” By consistent usage, Corp. U.S. trademarked the
name, “United States Government” referring to themselves. The District of
Columbia Organic Act of 1871 places Congress in control (like a corporate
board) and gives the purpose of the act to form a governing body over the
municipality; this allowed Congress to direct the business needs of the
government under the existent martial law and provided them with corporate
abilities they would not otherwise have. This was done under the
constitutional authority for Congress to pass any law within the ten mile square
of the District of Columbia. Follow this link to see the effect of the District of
Columbia Act of 1871.

3rd: In said Act, Corp. U.S. adopted their own constitution (United States
Constitution), which was identical to the national Constitution (Constitution of
the United States of America) except that it was missing the national
constitution’s 13th Amendment and the national constitution's 14th, 15th and
16th amendments are respectively numbered 13th, 14th and 15th
amendments in the Corp. U.S. Constitution. At this point take special notice
and remember this Corp. U.S. method of adopting their own Constitution, they
will add to it in the same manner in 1913.

4th: Corp. U.S. began to generate debts via bonds etc., which came due in
1912, but they could not pay their debts so the 7 families that bought up the
bonds demanded payment and Corp. U.S. could not pay. Said families settled
the debt for the payments of all of Corp. U.S.' assets and for all of the assets of
the Treasury of the United States of America.

5th: As 1913 began, Corp. U.S. had no funds to carry out the necessary
business needs of the government so they went to said families and asked if
they could borrow some money. The families said no (Corp. U.S. had already
demonstrated that they would not repay their debts in full). The families had
foreseen this situation and had the year before finalized the creation of a
private corporation of the name "Federal Reserve Bank". Corp. U.S. formed a
relationship with the Federal Reserve Bank whereby they could transact their
business via note rather than with money. Notice that this relationship was
one made between two private corporations and did not involve government;
that is where most people error in understanding the Federal Reserve Bank
system—again it has no government relation at all. The private contracts that
set the whole system up even recognize that if anything therein proposed is

5
found illegal or impossible to perform it is excluded from the agreements and
the remaining elements remain in full force and effect.

6th: Almost simultaneously with the last fact (also in 1913), Corp. U.S. adopts
(as if ratified) their own 16th amendment. Tax protesters challenge the IRS tax
collection system based on this fact, however when we remember that Corp.
U.S. originally created their constitution by simply drafting it and adopting it;
there is no difference between that adoption and this—such is the nature of
corporate enactments—when the corporate board (Congress) tells the
secretary to enter the amendment as ratified (even thought the States had not
ratified it) the Se3cretary was instructed that the Representatives word alone
was sufficient for ratification. You must also note, this amendment has nothing
to do with our nation, with our people or with our national Constitution, which
already had its own 16th amendment. The Supreme Court (in BRUSHABER
v. UNION PACIFIC R. CO., 240 U.S. 1 (1916)) ruled the 16th amendment did
nothing that was not already done other than to make plain and clear the right
of the United States (Corp. U.S.) to tax corporations and government
employees. We agree, considering that they were created under the authority
of Corp. U.S.

7th: Next (also 1913) Corp. U.S., through Congress, adopts (as if ratified) its
17th amendment. This amendment is not only not ratified, it is not
constitutional; the nation's Constitution forbids Congress from even discussing
the matter of where Senators are elected, which is the subject matter of this
amendment; therefore they cannot pass such and Act and then of their own
volition, order it entered as ratified. According to the United States Supreme
Court, for Congress to propose such an amendment they would first have to
pass an amendment that gave them the authority to discuss the matter.

8th: Accordingly, in 1914, the Freshman class and all Senators that
successfully ran for reelection in 1913 by popular vote were seated in Corp.
U.S. Senate capacity only; their respective seats from their States remained
vacant because neither the State Senates nor the State Governors appointed
new Senators to replace them as is still required by the national Constitution
for placement of a national Senator.

9th: In 1916, President Wilson is reelected by the Electoral College but their
election is required to be confirmed by the constitutionally set Senate; where
the new Corp. U.S. only Senators were allowed to participate in the Electoral
College vote confirmation the only authority that could possibly have been
used for electoral confirmation was corporate only. Therefore, President
Wilson was not confirmed into office for his second term as President of the
United States of America and was only seated in the Corp. U.S. Presidential
capacity. Therefore the original jurisdiction government's seats were
vacated because the people didn't seat any original jurisdiction
government officers. It is important to note here that President Wilson

6
retained his capacity as Commander in Chief of the military. Many people
wonder about this fact imagining that such a capacity is bound to the President
of the nation; however, When John Adams was President he assigned George
Washington to the capacity of Commander in Chief of the military in
preparation for an impending war with France. During this period, Mr. Adams
became quite concerned because Mr. Washington became quite ill and
passed on his acting military authority through his lead General Mr. Hamilton
and Mr. Adams was concerned that if war did break out Mr. Hamilton would
use that authority to create a military dictatorship of the nation. Mr. Adams
averted the war through diplomacy and the title of Commander in Chief was
returned to him.

(See: John Adams, by David McCullough, this book covers Mr. Adams
concerns over this matter quite well. Mr. Adams was a fascinating man.)

10th: In 1917, Corp. U.S. enters W.W. I and passes their Trading with the
Enemies Act.

11th: In 1933, Corp. U.S. is bankrupt, they force a banking holiday to

exchange money backed Federal Reserve Notes with “legal tender” Federal
Reserve Notes the Trading with the Enemies Act is adjusted to recognize the
people of the United States as enemies of Corp. U.S.

12th: Some time after 1935, you ask Social Security Administration for a
relationship with their program. With the express purpose of generating
Beneficiary funds to United States General Trust Fund (GTF) the Social
Security Administration creates an entity with a name (that sounds like your
name but is spelled with all capital letters) and an account number (Social
Security number). They give you the Social Security card and let you know
that the card does not belong to you but you are to hold it for them until they
want it back. If you are willing to accept that responsibility over the card you
activate the card by signing it, which gives you the ability to act as the fiduciary
for the cards actual owner Corp. U.S. and you can use the card’s name and
number to thus transact business relations for the card’s actual owner. You
are also to note that though the card verifies its agency (you as the single
person with authority to control the entity so created) it is not for use as
identification. On review: notice the Social Security Administration was the
creator of the entity, they offered you the opportunity to serve its Trustee
capacity (by lending it actual consciousness and physical capacity), they gave
you something (the card) that does not belong to you to hold in trust and they
reserved the actual owner of the thing (Corp. U.S.) as the beneficiary of the
entity—by definition, this only describes the creation and existence of a Trust.
More importantly: the name they gave this Trust is not your name, the number
they gave the Trust is not your number and your lending actual consciousness
and physical capacity to this Trust’s Trustee capacity does not limit you or your

7
capacity to separately act in your natural sovereign capacity in any way—what
you do, when you do it and how you do it is still totally up to you.

13th: In 1944, under the Bretton Woods Agreement, Corp. U.S. is quit
claimed to the International Monetary Fund, and becomes a foreign
controlled private corporation. [From Melvin and Susan: BAD MATH
FELLAS! Make sure you’re sitting down for this one. We turn now to
United States Code (USC) Title 22 § 286 and read the following: "§ 286.
Acceptance of membership by the United States in International Monetary
Fund. "The President is hereby authorized to accept membership for the
United States in the International Monetary Fund (hereinafter referred to
as the "Fund"), and in the International Bank for Reconstruction and
Development (hereinafter referred to as the "Bank"), provided for by the
Articles of Agreement of the Fund and the Articles of Agreement of the
Bank as set forth in the Final Act of the United Nations Monetary and
Financial Conference dated July 22, 1944, and deposited in the archives
of the Department of State. (July 31, 1945, ch 339, § 2, 59 Stat. 512.)
Short titles: … May be cited as the ‘Bretton Woods Agreements Act’.
"Other provisions: Par value modification. For the Congressional direction
that the Secretary of the Treasury maintain the value in terms of gold of
the Inter-American Development Bank’s holdings of United States dollars
following the establishment of a par value of the dollar at $38 for a fine
troy ounce of gold pursuant to the Par Value Modification Act and for the
authorization of the appropriations necessary to provide such
maintenance of value, see 31 USC § 449a."...The act further transfers
the assets of the United States Treasury to the IMF by stating words to
the effect of: ‘the United States Treasury is now the Individual Drawing
account of the IMF’...Think about it. "The President is hereby authorized
to accept membership for the United States in the IMF" The President is
authorized by whom? Congress? Well, even if Congress did
authorize it where did they get the authority to so do? Certainly not
from the Constitution, and Congress can’t lawfully do anything the
Constitution doesn’t authorize them to do...The Constitution plainly
states: "The enumeration in the Constitution of certain rights, shall not be
construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people."... Ninth
amendment; and, "The powers not delegated to the United States by the
Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States
respectively, or to the people." ...Tenth Amendment Further this joining in
the IMF is obviously an international agreement; and, any good dictionary
will define, "an agreement between nations" as a, "Treaty". The
constitution is very specific on how treaties are to be engaged in with this
nation - First, the President signs the treaty; and Second, the Senate
ratifies his signature with a two-thirds majority vote...That didn’t happen
here. So if the right wasn’t given in the Constitution, Congress can’t take it
and give it to the President... This act states that Authorization came
from the U.N. instead of from Congress, "provided for … as set forth in

8
the Final Act of the United Nations": There was no treaty with the U.N.
until December 20, 1945, five months later, so the U.N. could not
exercise its treaty with Corp. U.S. If it did not add up then it never will
as you cannot og back in time and change the probability or reality
you have already played out; it is or it is history exactly like Obama’s
and this court’s prior actions. Back to TeamLaw’s work which my
own reasoning and fact checking supports- Melvin and Susan]:

14th: In 1968, at the National Governor's Conference in Lexington, Kentucky,

the IMF leaders of the event proposed the dilemma the State governors were
in for carrying out their business dealings in Federal Reserve Notes (foreign
notes), which is forbidden in the national and State constitutions, alleging that
if they did not do something to protect themselves the people would discover
what had been done with their money and would likely to kill them all and start
over. They suggested the States form corporations like Corp. U.S. and
showed the advantages of the resultant uniform codes that could be created,
which would allow better and more powerful control over the people, which
thing the original jurisdiction governments of this nation had no capacity to do.
Our Constitutions secure that the governments do not govern the people rather
they govern themselves in accord with the limits of Law. The people govern
themselves. Such is the foundational nature of our Constitutional Republic.

15th: By 1971, every State government in the union of States had formed
such private corporations (Corp. State), in accord with the IMF admonition, and
the people ceased to seat original jurisdiction government officials in their
State government seats.

Now, having stated these historical facts, we ask you not to believe us, but
rather prove these facts for yourself. We then ask you to contact us and share
your discovery with us.

When you find there is no error in this historical outline, then remember these
simple facts and let no one dissuade you from the truth.

The Bottom Line: when you speak about these private foreign corporations
remember that is what they are and stop calling them government.

Further, it is very important that we cease to attempt to fix them. It is far more
important that we learn how to reseat our original jurisdiction government and
spread the word about the truth. By reseating our State and national
governments in their original jurisdiction nature, we gain the capacity to hold
these private foreign corporations accountable. They owe us a lot of money, in
fact they owe us more money than there is available in the world. In fact it is
impossible for them to pay and that gives us the leverage we need to take
back our nation and put things right. The process is a simple one. The

9
 difficulty is in getting our people to wake up to the truth. That's why we ask
you to prove the truth for yourself and contact us with your discovery.

That means that you must stop acting and communicating like you are
anything other than the sovereign that God created you to be. And, stop
referring to Corp. U.S. or the STATE OF 'X' as anything other than the private
foreign corporations that they are. And, finally, stop listening to the Patriot
Mythology that is espoused by those that only give these facts lip service.”

You do not seem able or capable to comprehend the law or the point of it nor
its application or if you do you hate me personally and uniquely: I
EXACTLY NAMED PRIVATE MONEY AND FOREIGN INTERESTS,
“DAVID ROCKEFELLER” AS A LONE PERSON AND AS A BODY OF
BELIEF. I NEVER SWORE OUT ANY ALLEGIANCE TO ANY
FOREIGN AUTHORITY OR CRIMINAL OR CORRUPTED OR
INCAPABLE AKA UNSAFE AUTHORITY, NOT TO YOU, ROBERTS,
CLINTON, BUSH OR OBAMA; I NOT ONCE EVER ACTED FOR ANY
FOREIGN BUSINESS INTERESTS AND INSTEAD FOUGHT A LOCAL
WALMART AND WON AS IT DOES UNCONSTITUTIONAL BUSINESS
HERE AND ABROAD, NAMELY IN CHINA; I NEVER WILLINGLY
AND KNOWINGLY SUPPORTED FOREIGNIZATION IN ANY WAY; I
EVEN RAN TOLLS AS ROADS ARE SOMETIMES LEASED TO
FOREIGN NATIONS (EXACTLY AS THEY OWN SOME RED LIGHT
CAMERA TECHNOLOGY) PLUS I WAS TRAFFICKED ACROSS
STATE LINES AND SO I DO NOT IN ANY WAY IF AVOIDABLE
SUPPORT MY INJURY. PERIOD. I DID NOT VOTE KNOWINGLY AND
WILLINGLY THIS IN 2008 AS I COULD HAVE FOUGHT AND WON
THE UNCONSTITUTIONAL ACTION DENYING ME MY LEGAL
VOTE BUT REALIZED TO DO SO WOULD BE TO COOPERATE THUS
THEN HAVE UNCLEAN HANDS SO INSTEAD I ACCESSED SCOTUS
TO SECURE MY LEGAL STANDING THUS MY VOTE OR POWER
AND AUTHORITY OVER MY OWN DESTINY AND FATE. On or around
12/22/06 when first reporting all I knew about NY’s corrupted court system
to the FBI as well as the federal corporation’s involvement to seat a
President who would be a foreigner to then protect private and foreign
investments illegally made here and abroad at my expense thus I named
HAWAII exactly as I knew it then would lead to a SCOTUS case of original
jurisdiction when the FBI failed me again? I NOT ONLY INVOKED MY
RIGHTS AS A NATURAL BORN SOVEREIGN AMERICAN CITIZEN, A
NATION UNTO MYSELF, BUT AS A SOVEREIGN CITIZEN OF
FLORIDA. LAST TIME I CHECKED? WASHINGTON DC IS NOT A

10
STATE BUT IS THE CORPORATE HEADQUARTERS OR SEAT OF THE
CORPORATION NOT THE SEAT OF THE LEGAL GOVERNMENT
(THAT LEGAL SEAT WOULD BE WHEREVER I AM THUS IS
NEPTUNE BEACH, FL) AND I WENT SO FAR AS TO NAME THAT
HONOR BOUND AGREEMENT BETWEEN WASHINGTON,
HAMILTON AND JEFFERSON THAT CREATED DC AS THEY NEVER
INTENDED FOR US, WE THE PEOPLE, TO BECOME A PRIVATE AND
FOREIGN CONTROLLED COMMODITY. THEY DID NOT SELL US
INTO SLAVERY AND/OR HUMAN BONDAGE. DC RATIFIED
NOTHING IN OUR GOVERNING DOCUMENTS! VOTING RIGHTS OF
CITIZENS IN THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA “ differ from those of United States
citizens in each of the 50 states. D.C. residents do not have voting representation in the
United States Senate and only a delegate in the House of Representatives, but D.C. is
entitled to three electoral votes for President.The United States Constitution grants
congressional voting representation to the states, which the District is not. The District is
a federal territory ultimately under the complete authority of Congress.” A
CONFLICT.

I NAMED ALL OF THIS EXACTLY SETTING UP THE FRAME WORK FOR

MY EVENTUAL SCOTUS WIN, A WIN THAT IS ALREADY. IF IT WERE
NOT FOR SCOTUS? DC WOULD BE A DEN OF ACTUAL INEQUITY AS
PROVEN BY ALL OF DC AND ITS EFFECT ON US LIKE AN ILLEGAL
WAR, ENDEMIC LETHAL VIOLENCE AGAINST WOMEN AND THE
ACTUAL SELLING OF OUR PERSONS AND OUR CHILDREN TO PRIVATE
AND FOREIGN INTERESTS UNTIL FEDERAL JUDGES ARE OPENLY
ACTING TO OVERTHROW THE DECLARATION AND CONSTITUTION
OR ACTUALLY MURDERING INNOCENT AMERICANS VIA AWARDING
THEM TO THE UNETHICAL AND THOSE WHOSE ‘POWER’ IS
ENTRENCHED AS IT IS ALL ABOUT PERCEPTION AND IS NOT THE
ACTUAL REALITY OF WHAT THE DECLARATION, CONSTITUTION OR
PRIOR SCOTUS RULINGS – US CASE LAW - CLEARLY AND EXACTLY
STATE. US CASE LAW? IF YOU HAD ANY ON YOUR SIDE YOU’D CITE
IT AND NOT RULE 42-4. Actual law as written in 1776 and 1787 and US case
law? Put up or shut up as in stop writing words you can never support in any
actual, legal court of law like SCOTUS and that only serve to prove your own
guilt as your words prove you to be repugnant thus your order is void : “the

11
Constitution's written nature, and the formal enumeration of the powers of
government would be empty promises if there were no means to measure the
actions of the government against the Constitution, and strike down those found
wanting (see Marbury, supra, at 177) "[c]ertainly all those who have framed
written constitutions contemplate them as forming the fundamental and
paramount law of the nation, and consequently the theory of every such
government must be, that an act of the legislature repugnant to the constitution is
void’”. As the Act is void then you are null and void. You are repugnant. It is my
protected right to abolish and dissolve you, the insufferable and unjust form. So
then: TeamLaw (and Melvin) is correct regarding some things one of which is the
five month disparity between the signing of the Treaty and the Act itself as you
can ENACT what does not yet exist! If there is no legal UN then there is no act
naming the UN as it is not a legal entity yet thus we cannot enact and engage in
what is not and sign the Treaty ex post facto. It constitutes actual ex post facto
law or pre facto law, anticipatory but which might never come to be real law, a
done deal w/o any representation, but however you choose to count it the math as
well as the reasoning and application is bad, very bad. I’m the acting, legal
President and Commander of original jurisdiction. Ideally you want to unseat
the crooks like the judges on this very bench and then reseat them with ethical
and moral persons. You do not want TWO governments, you do not want a
shadow one or to possess divided interests and you do not want foreigners
running this nation and killing the People. You want to export US law not import
socialism, Marxism, fascism, materialism, communism, despotism, dictatorship
or religious extremism. You also do not want to institute STUPID, AFRAID and
UNWILLING as qualifications. I unincorporated us by dissolving all kinds of
personal, mistaken and at times false belief and the ‘inserted’ or entrenched
corruption of the law thus liability does indeed ensue as you knew as I told you.
Some of it was legal at the time, it seemed to be then and did work then but now
it does not, and some of it never was legal and so is not now legal. Legally you
never were incorporated and me? I never agreed. Then whatever that thing was
that you referred to as a just government? Even you, the US, defaulted upon that
beast. Even you could not stand that ugly, clumsy thing you only called a

12
government of the People when it is not. Upon reading what original jurisdiction
actually is and means you legally must reverse or overturn your own ruling or
when I do eventually win - physically win as legally it has happened - as the
People finally suffer so much they are moved to support my Presidency even
with violence if that becomes necessary? You set yourself up for death as the fifth
amendment says WE do not need to convene a grand jury in this case to then
charge, try and convict you thus hang you. You were to command, no? YES,
AND IN TIME OF ACTUAL WAR. I am a keen observer and I have keenly and
wisely observed you named no actual, legal reason for abandoning your
command. NOTHING AT ALL. You said it is DISMISSED and MOOT but not
WHY. You did exactly quote Rule not law or case law “42-4” citing the
governing documents are "ENTIRELY WITHOUT MERIT" meaning you looked
right at the SCOTUS docket and American history books and even the UN in
NYC - all of which is a product of those governing documents so they must have
some merit - but then DENIED and DISMISSED it all or CONFESSED TO
YOUR GUILT IN WRITING! You are saying that WE, the people aka the
Constitution is entirely without merit and that my birth is without merit for if the
Revolution was never fought and I was never born in America naturally? I never
would have entered SCOTUS, the US never would have defaulted on 11/05/08
and Roberts never would have acted on 11/20/08. Are you serious? Do you truly
believe WE are this silly or that we would ever come to believe the Revolution
was not fought? Or that Obama/Biden is legal? I told you within my brief: "You
can make an attempt to defeat the math, US law and history - the universe - but
guess what? Only the mentally ill or insane do that." I take it then your plea is
insanity? As you are claiming Roberts himself and his action is w/o merit? That
he too is ‘crazy’ and cannot read? That like you some disembodied being put a
pen in his hand and a gun to his head and forced him to write "DENIED" any and
all protection of the law? You made a mistake: Roberts never said any such
thing. The appearance of the paper and computer generated docket only makes it
seem as if. He's not mentally ill and can and does reason. You, unlike he, wrote
"MOOT". Exactly. YES, I AGREE AS WE ALL DO: THE DECLARATION
AND CONSTITUTION IS NOW MOOT AS OFFICERS LIKE YOU RENDER

13
IT MOOT VIA YOUR ACTIONS THUS I WIN AGAIN AS YOU
CONCURRED! YOU’RE MY PROOF OF DEATH.

2. I have a volunteer. It was not humanly possible for him to act before he read
my brief as SCOTUS denied him informed consent thus now he can and may.
Upon re-entry to SCOTUS? He or any willing volunteer then joins my case thus
appearing in the caption. That makes him Vice President. He's a voter acting in
his official capacity as a voter as well as an individual. If he chooses not to
continue? Next person to get to me and volunteer wins IF they name their case
and so every element. Upon our win he then gets his name on the ballot for
President in 2012 as a candidate independent from me or in his own right. This
then makes us a brand new case of original jurisdiction. I have reasoned I can
enter several ways to make it ORIGINAL as I ruled all citizens were ignorant not
guilty like you are as you are an expert lawyer now exploiting your knowledge
thus abusing your power. The ignorant now not so ignorant are to get one
opportunity. Thus, you want to reconsider if you exist as a judge and as a living,
breathing human being let alone an American as SCOTUS is waiting for me as
our the People. You? You are not a foreigner thus you cannot escape the death
penalty by claiming you are not bound by the Constitution. You are or else you
would not have acted to cash a money order that read TRIBUTE across it and you
would not have then written DENIED and MOOT. You produced several pieces
of paper claiming that you are bound by the Declaration and Constitution. I not
only want a refund but the voters and I want a refund with interest: you gone as
that is in our best interest. And someone has volunteered to help me make that
happen sooner rather than later. For good measure I secured one other volunteer:
A man who cannot read so could not know of the SCOTUS action or the reasons
why BVG and Obama are illegal and in violation of the law. He is not to blame
for his injury as it was beyond his control until now. Until me, Susan.

3. You may not issue an ORDER instructing a clerk to commit what is a violation
of the Constitution and is a criminal act known as treason. Marbury V Madison
clearly states all people are each accountable and responsible thus if that order is
obeyed in open and direct violation of the letter or the law, its spirit, both and

14
which in violation of Marbury? The clerk is the liable as they are to defy such an
order as it itself is unconstitutional as it cites RULE not law and as it ignores and
denies every fact and all law of the US. I clearly stated that this court would not
know liberty as it could not as it was not willing to preserve, protect and defend
our law in my unique case, in the cases of women and in the cases of all ethical
or law abiding Americans, a part of which its spirit aka liberty. This sham of a
decision, ruling and order is evidence rising to proof and the person or people
who wrote it? Proof of all i claimed. Are you the judges of this bench denying
your own miserable existence? Oh that’s right! Life ain’t so hard for you is it? As
you have all of the overly broad power, as you have all of the tribute and as you
have all of the physical comforts you could ask for including a lifetime
appointment and never-ending paycheck as a direct result of tribute. Not if your
appointment was never legal and you just proved it for me.

4. This is rich: The fourth thing you do not know that you want to reconsider is
EVERYTHING I DO IS DELIBERATE. I'M INTENTIONAL EXACTLY LIKE
THE FOUNDERS. I used math on purpose! In SCOTUS? As life not paper
is proof I went out on a limb, I stepped out on faith, GOOD FAITH, and told
another human being who I can produce for SCOTUS: "I predict August, the
Appellate will rule in August as August has been a very big month for me." Now,
if the Creator, SCOTUS, the Founders and I and most if not all of the People
were not conspiring against you, the Federal Appellate, that is, if you were acting
constitutionally or in accordance with our law, how could I know August? It’s a
pattern that’s how and why, a pattern of deceit. Your act of crime is dated August
3rd. I received it on August 5th. I do not possess ESP but I do have the
Declaration and Constitution plus my own reasoning ability and capacity thus the
Creator – LAW - on my side.

5. The only reason I'm motioning for you to reconsider your reasoning, decision
and ruling, your application of lawlessness and rule but not anything actually
written by the Founders? To reconsider your criminal, traitorous idea that you
acted upon which is the Declaration and Constitution is DISMISSED and MOOT
and so does not apply to you? Or to me alone? Or to women and/or the ethical,

15
alone or as a group? So the process is finally exhausted thus when WE do put
you to death? You cannot cry you did not know or that WE did not inform you.
WE did inform you and you gave us your informed consent to put you to death
for treason. Your true belief is, or so I allege, based upon the proof known as
your work as your work is you as this is constitutional law: "This citizens are lazy
slobs who hate women especially bitches like Susan thus I’m safe from any
consequences." You'd be wrong as the Creator will take care of you if you drop
dead before we get to you and having to choose between me and you WHO do
you think the People will choose? As life is proof? FOUR TIMES I DID ALL I
COULD TO GET ARRESTED AND FOUR TIMES I WAS NOT. So far the
Secret Service, FBI, local police and Marshal has chosen their own lives over
yours. They have not chosen me but they have not chosen you either. They were
waiting to see your ruling and order. I told you: The Navy wished me luck when I
STOOD IT DOWN; THE NAVY SAID IF ANYONE CAN WE KNOW YOU,
SUSAN, WILL. The Navy’s job is NOT to make it easy. Ideally they aren’t to go
out of their way to harm me but hey, I reason the Navy acts in direct proportion to
the actual, legal threat that I am to the old and now failed model. I quoted US law
and case law and they told me WE ARE NOT AWARE A COUP HAS
OCCURRED. I said, I’ll prove it by standing down the offices of Chief Justice
and President. The Navy said, Good luck and if it is possible We know you will. I
told officer Bob M. of JAG: And when I do? Your name, Bob M., is at the top of
my very, very short list. YOU not the Navy.

6. What do you know? I did not need 20 pages but I took them. Actually I only
needed one sentence: On 05/11/08 the Solicitor General of the US waived
your interest (the interest of the judges and clerks reading this) and waived
your right to vote, act as a judge, express your opinion on anything or to
collect a salary and all of your rights (the rights of the judges and clerks
reading this). Legally, you have no interest and no right as you made no
objection and on August 3rd, 2009, upheld that waiver. SCOTUS served you
twice, 07-9804 & 08-6622, and twice you failed to answer or to object in any
way. You never had power and authority over me and still do not. When offered

16
it over yourself? You failed to claim it. You, BLACK, CARNES, and MARCUS
did not object and just upheld the waiver of your interest and right. You even
said the law or reality - it's inalienable - is MOOT. In your case YES but in
mine? NO. See, unlike you I vested my interest and my right by entering
SCOTUS directly and then coming back here as I never entered this court before
and as I, the case, never left SCOTUS only the paper with my name printed
on it did. Jurisdiction and issue did not magically change as our law did not nor
did I quit and/or fail. The law is any actual power and authority you might come
to have in this world? YOU GET IT FROM ME OR WE THE PEOPLE NOT
THE OTHER WAY AROUND! You do not give me anything. This actual power
and actual authority? It is born of the exactly named Creator thus is inalienable.
You can and may give it away but not take it from me: You gave your power and
authority away to me, SCOTUS and the People.

7. I not once ever wanted to become President. I had higher aspirations: Supreme
Court Justice. I was like a laser beam solely focused on that one institution and
how to get in on my own, as I knew there was a door no person could see. Jesus
told me he broke in for me. Jesus told me that he set a place for me. The
Founders repeated this to me over and over. They fully admitted: The only proof
we have is our own existence as an independent nation. You might fail us. Susan,
you of all people cannot fail us! They did not say this exactly they said it with
symbols or clues as they enshrined the truth of who and what they are as people
all over the place – in letters, books, rulings, currency, maps, portraits, schools,
flags, architecture, words etc. etc. You see a red, white and blue flag while I see,
hear and feel “Abraham” and the promise God made that came true for him, then
Washington and now me. You see a leaky ceiling where I see actual stars: Polaris
and Orion. You see a building and a filing system while I see a living institution,
the Library of Congress, with a plaque that makes me laugh: “Jefferson” as he
created it with his own books, books that now bear a Library of Congress ‘code’
number. You see actual money where I see Hamilton’s face but I think SAFETY
and feel ‘This new multicolored junk looks like it came out of a monopoly game;
it may has well have for what it is actually worth’. Your reality is false; it is not

17
my own as I learned to see past the physical world as the physical is all an
illusion...physicists who are doing nothing more than searching for God told me
to check the pulse rate of the respiring universe. So I knew – you are ‘crazy’ as
you are looking at THINGS and not considering the PEOPLE, or, HUMAN
HEARTS. The truth of the Founders is their mind and human heart, still beating.
You can and do hear it and feel it if you listen. It’s the emotional result of their
grand experiment that I knew to look for as you cannot see emotion but liberty
and safety are emotions. They made us safe. You made me unsafe. I changed my
awareness of the pulse rate of the respiring nation aka the Founders...I began to
follow Jesus accidentally by design by following John Adams as I cannot hear,
see or feel what I am way too close to, a body of belief known as “Thomas
Jefferson”. I know they lock the door at night. I know the building is guarded. I
know lawyers are hogging all the seats. That’s your reality, a fantasy in your
head based upon past events not what is now. My reality? Lawyers acting as if
they are hogs is against the spirit of the law. That was then this is now. I’m
already in! No lock, guard or lawyer can or may keep me out as long as I act in
my own defense. Later I began defending the Founders as the name “Patriot Act”
constitutes defamation of character as proven by those aforementioned “Bush”
memos. Are these guys nuts to act upon the belief that they can keep me, the
product or culmination of all who came before me, out? Wakey, wakey! The
Founders built it into the design: our law is designed to let you in as when the
Founders open a door and all 13 original states ratify it no federal judge can
close it. If the door is not there? The tool to make the door is. And if that door is
created, opened and so there it is but you do not know how to walk through it?
Or people keep stopping you from entering? Copy a play out of the Founders
book, which is their lives: Act, act as if you belong there and people will believe
you do...or actually disguise yourself. By the time they recognize the truth of
your argument in light of the facts and US law? It’s too late - you’re in! Or: Say
you know how and then act, take that step, faking it all the way if you have to as
life will eventually prove you wrong or right and the only real master you ever
have is experience. Addicts call this faking it until you are making it – making
US law and history that is! Fortunately for me I was born a legal prodigy. This

18
nation does not recognize legal prodigies, as those in charge truly believe you
cannot know something if an anointed authority keeps the knowledge from you.
You do not understand “reasoning” is inborn and acquired. You, a lawyer, truly
believe you have to learn the law in a law school or it is impossible as it is an
ultra-exclusive, closed club. Do musical prodigies need music lessons? No! I,
like a genius musician, am born with this skill, a human quality and a human
ability. How did that first black or Native lawyer, a SCOTUS case, come to be?
They did it on their own, that’s how. You victimized them until they knew to
then act in the opposite direction, as an opposing force against you, thus
overcoming the made up barriers which exist in your mind and within your heart
but not within US law. The other reason this nation lost out on me the prodigy
and still does not recognize me as a genius? Stendhal told me: ALL WOMEN
BORN GENIUSES ARE LOST TO THE PUBLIC GOOD. How is this good
for the public??? It defies reason and our law, if not the sitting officers, is
reasonable as reason is the very nature of its design. You know what else is?
Intention, as all of this is intentional. The Founders meant for me to happen!

Motion to reconsider granted so Susan's ruling is upheld: BLACK,

CARNES and MARCUS are MOOT as they are guilty of treason. The death
penalty may now be carried out IF and only IF they do not revoke the waiver
of their rights by hearing this case in person or issuing an order AGAINST
Obama, Roberts and the US not against reason thus a against our
Constitution. A federal judge is to know: By their very design federal judges
are to be intentionally constitutional and of good behavior. Is your defense
that you never, ever read the Federalist Papers not even when I printed them
out for you? Federalist 78, Hamilton: “To avoid an arbitrary discretion in the
courts, it is indispensable that they should be bound down by strict rules and
precedents, which serve to define and point out their duty in every particular case
that comes before them; and it will readily be conceived from the variety of
controversies which grow out of the folly and wickedness of mankind, that the
records of those precedents must unavoidably swell to a very considerable bulk, and
must demand long and laborious study to acquire a competent knowledge of them.

19
Hence it is, that there can be but few men in the society who will have sufficient skill
in the laws to qualify them for the stations of judges. And making the proper
deductions for the ordinary depravity of human nature, the number must be still
smaller of those who unite the requisite integrity with the requisite
knowledge...Upon the whole, there can be no room to doubt that the convention
acted wisely in copying from the models of those constitutions which have
established good behavior as the tenure of their judicial offices...”

I will let the citizens know the outcome or consequences of BLACK,

CARNES and MARCUS’ own bad ideas and acts that thankfully are not our
law. BLACK, CARNES and MARCUS do not constitute US law at work but
their own whim and will or their prejudices and fears at work. This ruling in
the form of a motion to reconsider constitutes an arrest warrant upon a
charge of treason as well as other, lesser acts of sedition and subversion.

ENTERED AND ORDERED AUGUST 5th, 2009.

Susan Herbert,
The acting, legal President and Commander in Chief, as I am,
As my will, my reasoning, my one vote, the equal protection and due process
clauses and Marbury make it so

20