Professional Documents
Culture Documents
com
Janet D. McDonald
ootkabearmcdonald
James B. Stegeman
821 Sheppard Rd.
Stone Mountain, GA 30083-3642
(404) 300-9782
June 25, 2009
FAX & USPS PRIORITY MAIL: 0103 8555 7497 0261 6292
Claims Department
First American Title Insurance Company
2750 Chancellorsville Drive
Tallahassee, FL 32312
[1]
On or around June 9, 2009, after again being unable to contact
Ms. Nix and after she refused to respond to messages requesting that
she call us back, we sent a FAX to your office informing you of the
problem contacting her.
On or around June 12, 2009 we received a FAX from Ms. Nix which
I have attached hereto as “B”; The FAX we sent Ms. Nix in response is
“C”.
Rather than perform a proper investigation, Ms. Nix made
ridiculous findings and slanderous, libelous remarks when denying
liability of the claim.
Information that Ms. Nix should know as part of her career choice, or
should have found had she actually done an investigation2
1. We were plaintiffs, nowhere have we found that the company
represents Plaintiffs.
2. One cause of action was libel per se; nowhere have we found that
the company represents Plaintiffs suing for libel.
3. Georgia Power’s claim was not properly before the Court
4. Would have first checked the reports and findings of the required
examiner/auditor/master that gave the Court authority to make
it’s Ruling.
The Georgia Supreme Court in Woodruff v.
Morgan County, 670 S.E.2d 415, 284 Ga. 651 (Ga.
11/17/2008) held the following:
“Without the appointment of a special master … the
trial court was not authorized to enter a default
judgment against them. See Bonner v. Bonner, 272
Ga. 545 (2) (533 SE2d 72) (2000). Because the trial
court's entry … is a nonamendable defect
appearing on the face of the record, the trial court
erred in failing to set aside the default judgment when
requested to do so by the Woodruffs. Shields v. Gish,
280 Ga. 556 (2) (629 SE2d 244) (2006); OCGA § 9-11-
60 (d) (3). Accordingly, we reverse the decision of the
trial court and remand this case with the direction that
a special master be appointed.”
2
Ms. Nix should have full working knowledge of GA Law, it is not our responsibility to advise
her of the law; nevertheless as a courtesy we are listing GA and/or Federal laws pertinent.
[3]
5. A “nonamendable defect appearing on the face of the record is a
“void judgment” having no effect.
See Smyrna Marine, Inc. v. Stocks, 69303 (172 Ga.
App. 426) (323 SE2d 286) (1984) which held the
following:
“in Wasden v. Rusco Indus., 233 Ga. 439, 445 (211
SE2d 733) (1975), the Supreme Court held that
'[s]tatutes of limitation have no application to [void]
judgments, and there can be no bar, estoppel or
limitation as to the time when a void judgment may be
attacked.' " The court further held that "a judgment is
void on its face when there is a non-amendable
defect appearing on the face of the record …." Id.
at 444. See also Ricks v. Liberty Loan Corp., 146 Ga.
App. 594 (1 & 2) (247 SE2d 133) (1978) (cert. den.).”
6. Ms. Nix would have found, had she done the investigation, that
the Judge violated the Georgia Land Registration Laws3 by failing
to appoint an examiner of title/auditor/master4 as mandated.
7. The Judge neglected bringing the property under jurisdiction of
the Court “in rem” as mandated by Georgia Land Registration
Laws.
8. Our complaint was dismissed with prejudice June 11, 2006.5
Law."
4
O.C.G.A. §44-2-100 The judge of the superior court of each judicial circuit shall appoint at
least one auditor, who shall be known as the examiner; O.C.G.A. § 44-2-77 While the cause is
pending before the examiner of titles; O.C.G.A. § 44-2-64… the recommendation of the
examiner, may require a fuller and more adequate description or one tending more permanently
to identify the tract in question; O.C.G.A. §44-2-74 If the report of the examiner;
5
Dismissal with prejudice in Georgia dismisses both the claim and any counterclaim.
[4]
American.
As Ms. Nix was told, the suit was filed after discovering through
GFAF ORA6 request, that Georgia Power Company supervisor had told
Georgia State Patrol Troopers that we had said we would kill him if he
came to our property.7
We have seen nowhere in the Policy8 that you represent Plaintiffs,
particularly Plaintiffs suing for libel. Although the suit did state that
there was no easement on our property; until the Court deemed that
the 1941 document was legitimate,we believed that there was no
easement. Without which,there could be no file claimed with First
American.
Furthermore, we contactedEverhome Mortgage Company May 28,
2008 and Faxed them information seeking assistance “D”. Everhome
Mortgage knows that we have title insurance; Everhome never
suggested contacting you; and we find it hard to believe that they did
not contact you.
Because the Judge neglected and refused to follow the
mandatory laws, dismissed our complaint with prejudice the day after
being served as defendant in Federal Court, results in judgment void
on its face.
¶2: Ms. Nix complains that we filed the claim shortly before a
6
Georgia First Amendment Foundation Open Records Act
7
Mr. Stegeman is 100% Federally disabled; one of the disabilities is acute bi-polar disorder.
After speaking with a document examiner, who is also Deputy Chief of Police for the City of
Duluth, and he agreed that should anything happen to the GA Power supervisor, we would be the
first ones arrested, we were forced to file suit.
8
“the Policy” refers to the Owner’s Policy of Title Insurance issued by First American Title
Insurance Company GF – OP 1814 Georgia ALTA Owner’s Policy, Policy No. GF- OP-47430,
date of policy August 22, 1994 @ 8:30 AM in the amount of $55,000.00
[5]
Summary Judgment hearing. She fails to state the complaint had been
dismissed with prejudice a year beforehand; thereby there could be no
complaint or counterclaim pending; without which there legally could
be no Summary Judgment. Furthermore, we filed Motion to set aside
the judgment so that we could participate with the bogus Summary
Judgment. Hand delivered Summary Judgment Brief to the Court,
where it was held for over 30 days without being placed on the docket
report, then mailed back to us unfiled.
¶3: states“Final Order” and “you did not appear at the hearing despite
receiving adequate notice”. Rather than make accusations, Ms. Nix
should have been wondering why such an Order states what it does;
anyone with any sense knows…
A. The United States Supreme Court, United States Constitution 9,
Federal laws10, Georgia Supreme Court11, Georgia Constitution and
state laws forbid the Rulings made by Judge Becker.
B. Superior Court has fifteen or more hearings scheduled on the
calendar for the same day;
C. all notices of hearing sent out shows 9:30 AM;
D. Once the Judge gets there, which is never before the time the
court is scheduled to start, there is a roll call and if one is lucky,
9
Both the United States and Georgia Constitutions forbid the taking of land without just
compensation first being paid.
10
Federal law cannot goes against state law.
The Supreme Court of Georgia has: repeatedly found against Georgia Power when the claim of
11
prescriptive easement was a defense: Georgia Power v. Irving, 267 Ga. 760, 482 S.E.2d 362 (Ga.
03/19/1997) SUPREME COURT OF GEORGIA; stated that the laws governing land must be
strictly abided by: Frank v. City of Atlanta, 72 Ga. 428, 432 (2) (1884). See also Sims v. City of
Toccoa, 256 Ga. 368, 369 (349 S.E.2d 385) (1986).; that an examiner/auditor/master must be
appointed: Woodruff v. Morgan County, 670 S.E.2d 415, 284 Ga. 651 (Ga. 11/17/2008), Bonner
v. Bonner, 272 Ga. 545 (2) (533 SE2d 72) (2000), Woodruffs. Shields v. Gish, 280 Ga. 556 (2)
(629 SE2d 244) (2006); OCGA § 9-11-60 (d) (3); that the proceeding must be in rem: O.C.G.A.
§44-2-61;
[6]
the hearings will begin around 10:30AM;
E. The Judge doesn’t sign the Order immediately upon making a
Ruling, she has to wait until an Order has been drawn up;
F. The Orders are not filed the day they are made as the Court goes
on until 5:00 or 5:30 PM;
G. The clerks go home at 5:00 PM. leaving no time for the filing the
same day
The hearing was set for 9:30 AM, yet the Order was signed and
filed at 9:12AM before the Judge or any of the parties appearedat the
Courthouse. How would the Judge have known we were not there?
How did a document get signed and filed on a Monday morning
beforethe Judge was at the Courthouse? The only possible way is for
the Order to have been signed sometime Friday. And Ms. Nix
investigated this? Not hardly.
¶4: Goes to the trouble of mentioning the dimensions of our property,
and tries to allege that the GA Power only has easement over
15’-30’feet. This statement is ludicrous. Had Ms. Nix actually
investigated, she would have found Georgia Power has already taken
40-50+ feet (30’ beyond County Right of Way), she would have found
what a prescriptive easement means12 and the fact that neither the GA
Power’s documents, nor the Judge’s order specifies where the lines are
or how much easement they actually have.
GA Power claims to have easement over the entire Land Lot
which consists of 44 acres, encompassing our entire property. The
Supreme Court of Georgia has stated that the amount of land
encompassed must be stated with definiteness in order for there to be
12
Prescriptive easement gives property rights and, the Order fails to state where the easement
actually is, how much property is actually involved, etc. GA Power has maintained that they
have easement over the entire property!
[7]
an easement, a condemnation, or eminent domain. The Judge again
ignored the law and stare decisis thereby further violating the law.
¶5: makes more preposterousstatements: “allege procedural errors”
and “filed an action in federal court under Social Security Act and
the Americans with Disabilities Act”. Again, if Ms. Nix had actually
done the investigation, she would not have to have someone explain
due process violations, Title II violations; or that a suit under 42 §§
1985, 1983, Conspiracy, Due Process Violations, Civil and
Constitutional Rights violations under color of law differ from SSA and
ADA.13
Besides, when a Judge ignores mandated law and does as he/she
pleases, that is violation of procedure, violation of due process, and
Civil and Constitutional Rights violations under color of law. The kinds
of violations against a disabled American fall under U.S.C. Title §§ 241,
242 criminal civil rights violations for which a judge is not immune.
Conspiracy Against Rights, 18 U.S.C. § 241.
Section 241 makes it unlawful for two or more
persons to agree together to injure, threaten, or
intimidate a person in any state, territory or district
in the free exercise or enjoyment of any right or
privilege secured to him/her by the Constitution or
the laws of the Unites States, (or because of his/her
having exercised the same). …Section 241 does not
require that one of the conspirators commit an overt
act prior to the conspiracy becoming a crime. The
offense is punishable by a range of imprisonment up to
a life term or the death penalty, depending upon the
circumstances of the crime, and the resulting injury, if
Again, it is not our place to make Ms. Nix aware of state or federal laws and/or causes of
13
action. Due process is not that hard to understand and if anyone is interested in the laws
governing the Social Security Act or the Americans with Disabilities Act, the laws are easily
obtainable online, as are the Civil Rights Acts and criminal civil rights statutes.
[8]
any.
Ms. Nix may get away with treating some of the persons whose
titles you insure, as idiots; we are not idiots, not ignorant of the law,
not unintelligent, and don’t appreciate the treatment.
After all of Ms. Nix’ discrediting of us, she finally gets to the
business at hand on the second page.
1. “Paragraph 3, excludes coverage for matters created, suffered
or assumed by the insured” “matters resulting in no loss or
[10]
damage”
2. “Paragraph 3,…in case of any litigation” “if prompt notice is
not given, ‘all liability of the Company shall terminate’ to the
extent that the Company has been prejudiced by the failure to
do so.”
Sincerely,
[13]
Janet D McDonald
James B. Stegeman
P.S. I would also appreciate the address and name of whom to direct a
Georgia Open Records Act Request or Freedom of Information Act
request.
[14]