Countrywide Traffic Impact Analysis

October 2006

Prepared for: Countrywide Home Loans For Submittal to: City of Chandler
M-M Project Number: 8601.001

Prepared by:
Paul E. Basha, P.E., P.T.O.E. Andres Sotil, E.I.T., Ph.D.

80 E Rio Salado Parkway, Suite 201 Tempe, Arizona 85281 Phone (480) 517-5800 Fax (480) 517-5801

Countrywide

Traffic Impact Analysis

Table of Contents
Executive Summary .................................................................................................................. 1 Introduction ............................................................................................................................. 12 Scope of Study........................................................................................................................ 12 Proposed Development ........................................................................................................... 12 Surrounding Land Use ............................................................................................................ 12 Study Area .............................................................................................................................. 12 Surrounding Transportation System ........................................................................................ 16 Existing Traffic Counts ............................................................................................................ 16 Horizon Year ........................................................................................................................... 17 Future Ambient Traffic............................................................................................................. 26 Signal Warrant and Multiway Stop Analysis Existing without Site ......................................... 27 Signal Warrant Analysis Ambient without Site ...................................................................... 37 Level-of-Service Analysis without Site ..................................................................................... 38 Proposed Site Trip Generation ............................................................................................. 51 Proposed Site Trip Distribution ............................................................................................. 53 Signal Warrant Analysis with Site ............................................................................................ 74 Level-of-Service Analysis with Site .......................................................................................... 74 Turn Lane Analysis with Site ................................................................................................... 81 Summary of Conclusions ........................................................................................................ 86

Page i

Countrywide

Traffic Impact Analysis

List of Figures
Figure 1: Ambient 2020 Recommended Lane Configurations - Adjacent Intersections.............. 3 Figure 2: Ambient 2020 Recommended Lane Configurations - Western Intersections .............. 4 Figure 3: Ambient 2020 Recommended Lane Configurations - Southern Intersections ............. 5 Figure 4: Recommended Lane Configurations for Adjacent Intersections - 2020 with Site ........ 6 Figure 5: Recommended Lane Configurations for Western Intersections - 2020 with Site ......... 7 Figure 6: Recommended Lane Configurations for Southern Intersections - 2020 with Site........ 8 Figure 7: Recommended Turn Lane Lengths for Adjacent Intersections - 2020 with Site .......... 9 Figure 8: Recommended Turn Lane Lengths for Western Intersections - 2020 with Site ......... 10 Figure 9: Recommended Turn Lane Lengths for Southern Intersections - 2020 with Site ....... 11 Figure 10: Overall Vicinity Map ............................................................................................... 13 Figure 11: Greater Vicinity Map Adjacent Intersections ........................................................ 14 Figure 12: Greater Vicinity Map Western Intersections ........................................................ 15 Figure 13: Greater Vicinity Map Southern Intersections........................................................ 16 Figure 14: Existing Traffic Adjacent Intersections Directional Day ......................................... 18 Figure 15: Existing Traffic Western Intersections Directional Day.......................................... 19 Figure 16: Existing Traffic Southern Intersections Directional Day ........................................ 20 Figure 17: Existing Turning Movements Adjacent Intersections AM Peak Hour .................... 21 Figure 18: Existing Turning Movements Western Intersections AM Peak Hour .................... 22 Figure 19: Existing Turning Movements Southern Intersections AM Peak Hour ................... 23 Figure 20: Existing Turning Movements Adjacent Intersections PM Peak Hour .................... 24 Figure 21: Existing Turning Movements Western Intersections PM Peak Hour .................... 25 Figure 22: Existing Turning Movements Southern Intersections PM Peak Hour ................... 26 Figure 23: Adjacent Streets Ambient 2020 Traffic Directional Day ....................................... 28 Figure 24: Western Streets Ambient 2020 Traffic Directional Day ........................................ 29 Figure 25: Southern Streets Ambient 2020 Traffic Directional Day ....................................... 30 Figure 26: Adjacent Intersections Ambient 2020 Traffic Volumes AM Peak Hour ................. 31 Figure 27: Western Intersections Ambient 2020 Traffic Volumes AM Peak Hour.................. 32 Figure 28: Southern Intersections Ambient 2020 Traffic Volumes AM Peak Hour ................ 33 Figure 29: Adjacent Intersections Ambient 2020 Traffic Volumes PM Peak Hour ................ 34 Figure 30: Western Intersections Ambient 2020 Traffic Volumes PM Peak Hour.................. 35 Figure 31: Southern Intersections Ambient 2020 Traffic Volumes PM Peak Hour ................ 36 Figure 32: Existing 2006 Level-of-Service Adjacent Intersections AM Peak Hour ................... 40 Figure 33: Existing 2006 Level-of-Service Western Intersections AM Peak Hour .................... 41 Figure 34: Existing 2006 Level-of-Service Southern Intersections AM Peak Hour ................... 42 Figure 35: Existing 2006 Level-of-Service Adjacent Intersections PM Peak Hour ................... 43 Figure 36: Existing 2006 Level-of-Service Western Intersections PM Peak Hour .................... 44 Figure 37: Existing 2006 Level-of-Service Southern Intersections PM Peak Hour ................... 45 Figure 38: Ambient 2020 Level-of-Service Adjacent Intersections AM Peak Hour ................... 46 Figure 39: Ambient 2020 Level-of-Service Western Intersections AM Peak Hour ................... 47 Figure 40: Ambient 2020 Level-of-Service Southern Intersections AM Peak Hour .................. 48 Figure 41: Ambient 2020 Level-of-Service Adjacent Intersections PM Peak Hour ................... 49 Figure 42: Ambient 2020 Level-of-Service Western Intersections PM Peak Hour ................... 50 Figure 43: Ambient 2020 Level-of-Service Southern Intersections PM Peak Hour .................. 51 Figure 44: Site Traffic Trip Distribution AM and PM ................................................................. 54 Figure 45: Site Traffic Trip Distribution - Day ........................................................................... 55 Figure 46: Adjacent Streets Site Traffic Directional Day ....................................................... 56 Figure 47: Western Streets Site Traffic Directional Day ........................................................ 57 Figure 48: Southern Streets Site Traffic Directional Day....................................................... 58

Page ii

Countrywide

Traffic Impact Analysis

Figure 49: Adjacent Intersections Site Traffic Volumes AM Peak Hour................................. 59 Figure 50: Western Intersections Site Traffic Volumes AM Peak Hour ................................. 60 Figure 51: Southern Intersections Site Traffic Volumes AM Peak Hour ................................ 61 Figure 52: Adjacent Intersections Site Traffic Volumes PM Peak Hour................................. 62 Figure 53: Western Intersections Site Traffic Volumes PM Peak Hour ................................. 63 Figure 54: Southern Intersections Site Traffic Volumes PM Peak Hour ................................ 64 Figure 55: Adjacent Streets 2020 with Site Traffic Directional Day ....................................... 65 Figure 56: Western Streets 2020 with Site Traffic Directional Day ........................................ 66 Figure 57: Southern Streets 2020 with Site Traffic Directional Day ...................................... 67 Figure 58: Adjacent Intersections 2020 with Site Traffic Volumes AM Peak Hour................. 68 Figure 59: Western Intersections 2020 with Site Traffic Volumes AM Peak Hour ................. 69 Figure 60: Southern Intersections 2020 with Site Traffic Volumes AM Peak Hour ................ 70 Figure 61: Adjacent Intersections 2020 with Site Traffic Volumes PM Peak Hour................. 71 Figure 62: Western Intersections 2020 with Site Traffic Volumes PM Peak Hour ................. 72 Figure 63: Southern Intersections 2020 with Site Traffic Volumes PM Peak Hour ................ 73 Figure 64: Adjacent Intersections 2020 with Site Levels-of-Service AM Peak Hour .............. 75 Figure 65: Western Intersections 2020 with Site Levels-of-Service AM Peak Hour .............. 76 Figure 66: Southern Intersections 2020 with Site Levels-of-Service AM Peak Hour ............. 77 Figure 67: Adjacent Intersections 2020 with Site Levels-of-Service PM Peak Hour .............. 78 Figure 68: Western Intersections 2020 with Site Levels-of-Service PM Peak Hour .............. 79 Figure 69: Southern Intersections 2020 with Site Levels-of-Service PM Peak Hour ............. 80

List of Tables
Table 1: Peak Sixty-Minute Periods ........................................................................................ 17 Table 2: Signal Warrant Names .............................................................................................. 27 Table 3: Existing without Site Signal Warrant Analyses Summary........................................... 27 Table 4: Ambient without Site Signal Warrant Summary ......................................................... 37 Table 5: Signal Warrant Satisfaction Threshold at Benson Lane Frye Road Intersection ..... 38 Table 6: Level-of-Service Criteria for Signalized Intersections ................................................. 38 Table 7: Employee Arrival and Departure Times ..................................................................... 52 Table 8: Weekday Traffic Volume Calculation Details ............................................................. 53 Table 9: 2010 with Site Signal Warrant Summary ................................................................... 74 Table 10: Street Turn Lane Lengths ........................................................................................ 82 Table 11: Street Turn Lane Lengths (continued) ..................................................................... 83 Table 12: Street Turn Lane Lengths (continued) ..................................................................... 84 Table 13: Street Turn Lane Lengths (continued) ..................................................................... 85 Table 14: Street Turn Lane Lengths (continued) ..................................................................... 86

Page iii

Countrywide

Traffic Impact Analysis

List of Appendices
Existing Traffic Volumes .......................................................................................................... A Benson Lane and Frye Road .................................................................................. A.1 Ellis Street and Frye Road...................................................................................... A.2 Dobson Road and Frye Road ................................................................................. A.3 Dobson Road and Chandler Boulevard .................................................................. A.4 Ellis Street and Chandler Boulevard ....................................................................... A.5 NB Price Road and Chandler Boulevard ................................................................ A.6 SB Price Road and Chandler Boulevard ................................................................. A.7 Chandler Village Drive North and Chandler Boulevard ........................................... A.8 Chandler Village Drive North and Frye Road .......................................................... A.9 Galleria Way and Frye Road ................................................................................ A.10 SB Price Road and Frye Road ............................................................................. A.11 NB Price Road and Frye Road ............................................................................. A.12 Price Road and State Route 202 WB Ramp ......................................................... A.13 Price Road and State Route 202 EB Ramp .......................................................... A.14 Dobson Road and State Route 202 EB Ramp ...................................................... A.15 Dobson Road and State Route 202 WB Ramp ..................................................... A.16 Dobson Road and Pecos Road ............................................................................ A.17 Turning Movement Counts ................................................................................... A.18 Pertinent Excerpts from the Chandler Transportation Study Final Report ............................. B Traffic Signal Warrant Analyses without Site ........................................................................... C Existing without Site ............................................................................................. C.1 2020 Ambient without Site ................................................................................... C.2 Level-of-Service without Site ................................................................................................... D Existing without Site .............................................................................................. D.1 2020 Ambient without Site ..................................................................................... D.2 LOS Adjustments .................................................................................................. D.3 Trip Generation ....................................................................................................................... E Pertinent Excerpts of ITE Trip Generation .............................................................. E.1 Trip Generation Results.......................................................................................... E.2 2020 with Site Traffic Signal Warrant Analyses ....................................................................... F 2020 with Site Level-of-Service ............................................................................................... G

Page iv

Madison Crossing

Executive Summary Introduction

Countrywide Home Loans is planning the development of their corporate office buildings in the City of Chandler, north of Frye Road and east of the Price Freeway (State Route 101). The property size is approximately 24.4 gross acres, consisting of three buildings, each approximately 183,000 square feet, to serve approximately 3,429 employees. A complete Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA), including anticipated impacts and mitigation measures for the intersections in the immediate vicinity, is being prepared by Morrison-Maierle.

Results
The proposed development is anticipated to generate the following weekday traffic volumes.
ENTERING DAY AM PEAK HOUR PM PEAK HOUR 3,648 626 98 EXITING 3,648 77 552 TOTAL 7,296 703 650

Recommendations without the Countrywide Development

Only the Benson Lane and Frye Road intersection (#2) is not currently signalized of the seventeen (17) existing intersections evaluated in this study. The traffic warrant analysis indicates that the existing traffic conditions without the proposed site at this intersection does not satisfy warrants for a traffic signal. However, by the ultimate year 2020, traffic conditions without the proposed development will satisfy the warrants for a traffic signal. The required lane configurations to provide acceptable levels-of-service at the adjacent, western and southern intersections without the proposed site for the ultimate year 2020 are provided in Figure 1 through Figure 3, respectively. Only intersection #2 has the PM peak hour level-of-service at an F condition, if the stop sign is not substituted by a traffic signal. Drivers on minor street approaches like northbound Benson Lane are typically delayed and no mitigation is recommended at this time. The traffic volume at this intersection, as well as vehicle delay, should be regularly monitored to appropriately determine if and when a traffic signal would be necessary.

Madison Crossing

Recommendations with the Countrywide Development

The main site access on Frye Road intersection #2 should be monitored to determine if signalization is required. The estimated traffic volumes indicate that traffic signal warrants would be satisfied. The level-of-service analyses also indicate that the intersection would operate with unacceptable delay without a signal and with acceptable delay with a signal. However, the access will serve primarily visitors to the property not employees. Countrywide experiences relatively few visitors to its office. Most importantly, a traffic signal at this intersection would be disruptive for through traffic on Frye Road. Traffic signal warrant analysis was performed on the four (4) additional site accesses. It was determined that none of the intersections had traffic conditions that would satisfy the warrants for traffic signals in the ultimate year 2020 with the proposed development. The required lane configurations to provide acceptable levels-of-service at the adjacent, western and southern intersections are provided for the ultimate year 2020 with the proposed Countrywide development in Figure 4 through Figure 6. The recommended lengths of the full-width turn-lanes are provided on Figure 7 through Figure 9 on the turn lane length diagrams. Parking spaces and parking aisles within the Countrywide development should not be located within the recommended turn-lane lengths.

Madison Crossing

N N.T.S.

Chandler Boulevard 7 6

Dobson Road

Ellis Street

SITE
2 4 5 Frye Road

Benson Lane
STOP

Figure 1: Ambient 2020 Recommended Lane Configurations - Adjacent Intersections

STOP

Pecos Road 19

Madison Crossing

N N.T.S.

Chandler Boulevard 10 9 8

Figure 2: Ambient 2020 Recommended Lane Configurations - Western Intersections

Chandler Village Drive North

Price Freeway (SR 101)

11 12 13 14

Frye Road

Chandler Village Drive South

Galleria Way

Madison Crossing

N N.T.S.

15

16
Price Road

San

18
Tan Free way (S

R 20

2)

17
Dobson Road

Figure 3: Ambient 2020 Recommended Lane Configurations - Southern Intersections

Madison Crossing

N N.T.S.

Chandler Boulevard 7
Ellis Street

Dobson Road

STOP

Figure 4: Recommended Lane Configurations for Adjacent Intersections - 2020 with Site

STOP

STOP

SITE
1 2 3

21 20 4
STOP

5 Frye Road

Benson Lane

Pecos Road 19

Madison Crossing

N N.T.S.

Chandler Boulevard 10 9 8

Figure 5: Recommended Lane Configurations for Western Intersections - 2020 with Site

Chandler Village Drive North

Price Freeway (SR 101)

11 12 13 14

Frye Road

Chandler Village Drive South

Galleria Way

Madison Crossing

N N.T.S.

15

16
Price Road

San

18
Tan Free way (S

R 20

2)

17
Dobson Road

Figure 6: Recommended Lane Configurations for Southern Intersections - 2020 with Site

Madison Crossing

100'

350'

250'
N N.T.S.

175'

150'

250' 125'

175'
250' 200'

225'
225' 175' 250' 375' 150'

325'

375'

Chandler Boulevard 7
Ellis Street

50'

325' 200'

200'

SITE
1
75'

21 20
100'

350' 350'

5 Frye Road
325' 200'

75'

Benson Lane
175'
100'

175'

75'

1325' 475'

225'
325'

75' 300'
725'

Pecos Road 19

50'

Figure 7: Recommended Turn Lane Lengths for Adjacent Intersections - 2020 with Site

350'

Dobson Road

Madison Crossing

550'

950'

425' 325'

N N.T.S.

525'
325'

450'

Chandler Boulevard 10 9 8

50'

300'

50'

300'

750'

450'

150'

475' 275'

50'
100'

75'

150'

75'

125' 125'

11 12 13 14

525'

Frye Road

150'
825' 575'

150'

225'

475'

525'

325'
775'

400'

Galleria Way

Figure 8: Recommended Turn Lane Lengths for Western Intersections - 2020 with Site

600'

375'

Chandler Village Drive North

Price Freeway (SR 101)

Chandler Village Drive South

Madison Crossing

N N.T.S.

1075'

300' 225'

500'
225'

325'

15

16
Price Road

San

18
Tan Free way (S

R 20

2)

800'

17
Dobson Road
425' 300'
600' 600'

Figure 9: Recommended Turn Lane Lengths for Southern Intersections - 2020 with Site

1125'

Madison Crossing

Introduction
Countrywide Home Loans is planning the development of their corporate office buildings in the City of Chandler, north of Frye Road and east of the Price Freeway (State Route 101). The property size is approximately 24.4 gross acres, consisting of three buildings, each approximately 183,000 square feet, to serve approximately 3,429 employees.

Scope of Study
There are six purposes for this TIA: Analyze the existing traffic conditions Estimate the new traffic generated by the proposed Countrywide development Assign and distribute the new traffic to the surrounding street system Determine the need for auxiliary lanes at all study area intersections Evaluate the need for future traffic signals at all study area intersections Evaluate the operation of adjacent streets and intersections with the new development

Proposed Development
The proposed development consists of one (1) commercial parcel. Figure 9 depicts the general study area and Figure 10 through Figure 13 provide the study area in more detail.

Surrounding Land Use

The land surrounding the proposed development is primarily utilized for commercial use.

Study Area
The following intersections will be analyzed for ambient conditions and for conditions with the proposed development for the existing year and for the ultimate year 2020: Chandler Village Drive North and Chandler Boulevard State Route 101 and Chandler Boulevard (both southbound and northbound on/off ramps) Ellis Street and Chandler Boulevard Dobson Road and Chandler Boulevard Chandler Village Drive North and Frye Road Galleria Way and Frye Road State Route 101 and Frye Road (both southbound and northbound on/off ramps) Benson Lane and Frye Road (primary site access) Ellis Street and Frye Road Dobson Road and Frye Road Dobson Road and Pecos Road Dobson Road and State Route 202 (both eastbound and westbound on/off ramps) Price Road and State Route 202 (both eastbound and westbound on/off ramps)

Madison Crossing

Site Map

N.T.S.

Chandler Village Drive North

Chandler Boulevard

Price Freeway (SR 101)

SITE
Be ns on R

Chandler Village Drive South

Frye Road

ri a lle Ga

y Wa

oa d

Pecos Road

San

Tan

Fre ew

ay

Price Road

(SR

202 )

Figure 10: General Vicinity Map

Dobson Road

Ellis Street

Madison Crossing

N N.T.S.

Chandler Boulevard 7 6

Dobson Road

Ellis Street

SITE
1 2 3

21 20 Frye Road 4 5

Benson Lane

RAILOD

SOUTHERNPACIF

Pecos Road 19

Figure 11: Vicinity Map Adjacent Intersections

Madison Crossing

N N.T.S.

Chandler Boulevard 10 9 8

Chandler Village Drive North

Price Freeway (SR 101)

11 12 13 14

Frye Road

Chandler Village Drive South

Galleria Way

Figure 12: Vicinity Map Western Intersections

Madison Crossing

N N.T.S.

Dobson Road

15

16
Price Road

San

18
Tan Free way (SR

202 )

17

Figure 13: Vicinity Map Southern Intersections

Surrounding Transportation System

The primary streets that will serve the proposed development are State Route 101 west of the site, Chandler Boulevard to the north, Frye Road to the south, and Ellis Street east of the site.

Existing Traffic Counts

Traffic Research and Analysis counted current traffic volumes on Tuesday 1, Wednesday 2, and Thursday 3, August 2006. Approach and departure traffic counts at the study intersections for daily and hourly intervals were obtained. Turning movement counts in fifteen-minute intervals from 6:00 to 9:00 AM and from 3:00 to 7:00 PM were also obtained for these intersections on Tuesday 1 and Thursday 10, August 2006. The existing traffic volumes are provided in Appendix A to this report. Also included in Appendix A are tables providing the hourly counts by time of day, and graphs plotting the hourly traffic counts. Appendix A.1 through Appendix A.17 contain the approach and departure counts for the study intersections. Also included in these appendices are tables determining the maximum morning and evening hourly volumes and peak hour factors as determined from the approach counts, and graphs plotting the hourly traffic counts. Table 1 provides the peak sixty-minute periods within the three morning and evening hours of the traffic counts.

Madison Crossing

Table 1: Peak Sixty-Minute Periods

INTERSECTION Chandler Village Drive North and Chandler Boulevard Chandler Village Drive North and Frye Road Galleria Way and Frye Road NB Price Road (SR 101) and Chandler Boulevard SB Price Road (SR 101) and Chandler Boulevard NB Price Road (SR 101) and Frye Road SB Price Road (SR 101) and Frye Road Price Road and WB SR 202 Ramps Price Road and EB SR 202 Ramps Ellis Street and Chandler Boulevard Ellis Street and Frye Road Benson Lane and Frye Road Dobson Road and Chandler Boulevard Dobson Road and Frye Road Dobson Road and Pecos Road Dobson Road and WB SR 202 Ramp Dobson Road and EB SR 202 Ramp

AM PEAK HOUR 11:45 to 12:45 11:45 to 12:45 9:00 to 10:00 7:00 to 8:00 9:00 to 10:00 7:30 to 8:30 11:30 to 12:30 7:00 to 8:00 7:15 to 8:15 9:00 to 10:00 7:30 to 8:30 7:15 to 8:15 7:30 to 8:30 7:15 to 8:14 7:15 to 8:15 7:30 to 8:30 7:15 to 8:15

PM PEAK HOUR 4:30 to 5:30 5:00 to 5:00 4:30 to 5:30 4:30 to 5:30 4:45 to 5:45 4:30 to 5:30 4:45 to 5:45 4:30 to 5:30 4:15 to 5:15 12:15 to 1:15 4:45 to 5:45 4:30 to 5:30 4:45 to 5:45 4:45 to 5:45 4:45 to 5:45 3:45 to 4:45 4:45 to 5:45

Figure 14 through Figure 16 provide the existing directional daily traffic volumes for the study intersections. Appendix A.14 contains the turning movement counts for the seventeen (17) studied intersections. Figure 17 through Figure 22 show the existing turning movement traffic counts during the morning and evening peak hours, respectively.

Horizon Year
The horizon year selected for this analysis was 2020. The expected build out year for the proposed development is 2008. The City of Chandler requires analysis for the horizon year 2020 without and with the proposed development.

Madison Crossing

12,802

N.T.S.

Chandler Boulevard

21,781

18,418

19,017

14,258

2,253

2,422

18,252

7
20,985
2,230 2,506

6
17,731 18,987
13,045 13,654 12,851

17,377

Dobson Road

Ellis Street

20 Frye Road 1 2 3 4

7,099

12,056

SITE

21

6,261

5
7,991
12,334 2,725 2,510 12,921 10,507

6,943

134

75

Benson Lane
11,499

11,058

7,869

10,886

9,921
1,821 3,565

8,692
9,707

8,513
382 677

9,480

Pecos Road

2,281

2,933

19
2,232
10,024 9,964

2,144

Figure 14: Existing Traffic Adjacent Intersections Directional Day

Madison Crossing

842

855

20,780

15,565

Chandler Boulevard 9 8
25,481

N.T.S.

10
25,699
6,009 4,324

18,788

22,021

16,971

22,749
13,967

29,213

11,467

10,104

Chandler Village Drive North

22,677

Price Freeway (SR 101)

16,971

22,557

29,213
9,857

21,979

SOUTHERNPACIF

8,723

RAILOD

9,359
12,564 3,736 3,989 3,816

9,076

11
5,409

5,753

4,095

10,970

Frye Road 13 14

5,340

12
5,352
3,677

10,055
3,525

4,954
3,434 3,229

4,991

Figure 15: Existing Traffic Western Intersections Directional Day

14,062

Chandler Village Drive South

11,341

12,930

Galleria Way

11,467

10,366

9,359

Madison Crossing

21,370

N N.T.S.

6,281

21,694

6,145

18,128

18,588

10,505

9,737

5,509

11,141

15

6,400

16
Price Road

San

18
Tan Free w ay ( S

R 20

2)

18,128

18,588

17
Dobson Road
11,141 6,400

5,812
16,548 17,736

6,539

5,096
7,344 7,699

Figure 16: Existing Traffic Southern Intersections Directional Day

Madison Crossing

N.T.S.

Chandler Boulevard 7
13 752 139

144 413 118

9 1,122 106

160 926 144

29 21 22

6
94 479 150
208 846 96 79 11 22

Ellis Street

Dobson Road

20 Frye Road 1
4 720 20
6 1 2

64 497 152

SITE
2 3

21
227 282 61

4
73 139 122 140 472 9
30 23 20

5
308 863 63

Benson Lane
6 449 49 139 256 23
39 1 3

214 169 12

Pecos Road 19
19 27 38

268 104 69

10 381 28

Figure 17: Existing Turning Movements Adjacent Intersections AM Peak Hour

115 1,049 46

Madison Crossing

13 1,171 31

23 15 14

Chandler Boulevard 9 8

N N.T.S.

10
21 842 77
425 10 14 526 307 664

884 94

706 165

32 393 63

11 12
2 95 5

4 8 4

59 483 82

9 6 16

312 337 288

12 80 12

18 26 17

56 258 212

Galleria Way

1 6 51

Figure 18: Existing Turning Movements Western Intersections AM Peak Hour

Chandler Village Drive North Chandler Village Drive South

479 777

Price Freeway (SR 101)

33 283

164 441 122

281 1,082

332 392

Frye Road 13 14

568 135

101 96

Madison Crossing

180 1,087

N N.T.S.

350 212

262 1,408

384 3 143

501

15

798

16
Price Road

San

18
Tan Free way (SR

202 )

1,269 78

17
Dobson Road
275 321
507 137 1,369 58

Figure 19: Existing Turning Movements Southern Intersections AM Peak Hour

793 100

Madison Crossing

17 38 112

N.T.S.

Chandler Boulevard 7
122 1,410 117

239 732 230

23 1,323 26

179 824 176

6
260 1,181 247
283 43 65 237 574 145

Ellis Street

Dobson Road

20 Frye Road 1
7 1 2

88 830 199

SITE
2 3

21
142 238 34

4
182 434 231

5
180 637 71

706 6

Benson Lane
928 17 24 733 223
62 16

34 410 6

142 221 106

101 59 21

Pecos Road 19
5 101 183

73 60 37

44 916 123

Figure 20: Existing Turning Movements Adjacent Intersections PM Peak Hour

74 534 35

Madison Crossing

25 854 122

23 26 19

Chandler Boulevard 9 8

N N.T.S.

10
27 1,428 541
365 45 126 514 605 583

1,050 236

1,774 305

82 261 74

41 118 97

11 12
42 522 21

278 369 327

42 44 171

547 385 184

96 401 100

150 115 79

225 668 363

Galleria Way

7 41 370

Figure 21: Existing Turning Movements Western Intersections PM Peak Hour

Chandler Village Drive North Chandler Village Drive South

586 1,073

Price Freeway (SR 101)

229 745

202 454 260

704 1,581

202 523

Frye Road 13 14

857 231

599 529

Madison Crossing

342 1,904

N N.T.S.

376 22

1,152

295 1,566

208 120

15

484

16
Price Road

San

18
Tan Free way (SR

202 )

1,480 515

17
Dobson Road
294 407
902 385 1,588 224

Figure 22: Existing Turning Movements Southern Intersections PM Peak Hour

Future Ambient Traffic

The ambient future traffic volumes were determined using the Chandler Transportation Study (CTS) Final Report accepted by the City Council on 24 May, 2001. Appendix B provides pertinent excerpts from this study. The anticipated 2020 traffic volumes for the study roadways were taken from the CTS 2020 daily traffic forecasts, as directed by City of Chandler officials. For segments not provided in the CTS, growth rates were based on adjacent intersections using one of the following methods:

(1) For intersections with non-shared segments, a percentage increase was assumed based on a similar adjacent intersection whose predicted 2020 volumes are provided in the CTS.

458 172

Madison Crossing

(2) For intersections with shared segments, total volumes were assumed to be the same on the segment shared by the intersection provided in the CTS and the intersection not provided in the CTS. However, directional splits were based on existing directional splits for the intersection whose volume was being estimated. Figure 23 through Figure 31 show the directional daily and the morning and evening turning movement traffic counts for the ultimate conditions without the site in the ambient year 2020.

Signal Warrant Analysis Existing without Site

The Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD) as published by the United States Department of Transportation is the reference for determining the need for traffic signal installation throughout the United States. This document establishes eight separate, related sets of criteria termed warrants. If none of the eight warrants are satisfied, then a signal should not be installed. If one or more of the warrants are satisfied, then a signal might be appropriate. Appendix C.1 provides the complete traffic signal warrant analyses for the Benson Lane and Frye Road intersection (#2). Table 2 provides the names of the primary signal warrants and Table 3 summarizes the analyses results of the primary warrants. Table 2: Signal Warrant Names

WARRANT 1A 1B 1A and 1B 2 3B

NAME Minimum Vehicular Volume Interruption of Continuous Traffic Combination of Warrants Four-Hour Vehicular Volume Peak Hour Volume

Table 3: Existing without Site Signal Warrant Analyses Summary

Actual number of hours met Warrant Required hours met Benson Lane and Frye Road (Access 2) 1A 8 0 1B 8 0 1A & 1B 8 0 2 4 0 3B 1 0 Warrant Satisfied? NO

Madison Crossing

16,975

N.T.S.

Chandler Boulevard

25,513

25,488

25,025

19,025

2,688

3,013

23,075

7
24,488
2,713 3,088

6
24,513 24,975
19,525 20,475 20,613

21,925

Dobson Road

Ellis Street

20 Frye Road 1 2 3 4

8,713

19,388

SITE

21

7,688

5
9,788
19,513 3,313 3,088 20,488 21,400

8,513

225

75

Benson Lane
14,125

13,588

9,613

13,375

12,213
2,188 4,413

10,688
18,600

10,425
475 825

11,675

Pecos Road

10,200

23,100

19
8,800
21,500 20,500

17,900

Figure 23: Adjacent Streets Ambient 2020 Traffic Directional Day

Madison Crossing

1,200

900

24,400

25,100

Chandler Boulevard 9 8
31,300

N.T.S.

10
30,600 29,900

7,200

5,500

27,000

20,800

28,000

35,900

17,200

14,100

12,400

Chandler Village Drive North

27,900

Price Freeway (SR 101)

20,800

25,350

35,900

24,650

SOUTHERNPACIF

12,100
10,750 11,500 11,150

RAILOD

4,575

4,875

4,725

11
6,675

7,025

5,025

13,475

15,400

Frye Road 13 14

6,525

12
6,575 12,325

4,525

6,075

6,125

4,225

3,975

13,950

15,900

Galleria Way

4,275

Figure 24: Western Streets Ambient 2020 Traffic Directional Day

17,300

Chandler Village Drive South

14,100

12,750

11,500

Madison Crossing

26,300

N N.T.S.

7,700

26,600

7,500

20,200

22,300

22,800

21,800

11,400

23,100

15

13,300

16
Price Road

San

18
Tan Free way (SR

202 )

22,300

22,800

17
Dobson Road
23,100 13,300

7,100
20,350 21,750

8,000

10,600
20,600 21,400

Figure 25: Southern Streets Ambient 2020 Traffic Directional Day

Madison Crossing

N.T.S.

Chandler Boulevard 7
50 1,366 153

158 836 130

83 1,452 175

176 1,298 172

50 68 57

6
323 1,153 227

269 1,026 184

87 84 51

Ellis Street

Dobson Road

20 Frye Road 1
4 888 45
7 1 2

147 924 167

SITE
2 3

21
250 525 153

4
106 373 134 154 684 50
50 109 50

5
339 1,752 69

Benson Lane
7 646 54 153 567 50
43 1 34

235 229 66

Pecos Road 19
50 379 50

1,047 852 758

124 634 244

Figure 26: Adjacent Intersections Ambient 2020 Traffic Volumes AM Peak Hour

163 1,615 567

Madison Crossing

50 1,678 216

50 50 50

Chandler Boulevard 9 8

N N.T.S.

10
50 1,563 221

468 50 259

579 805 730

1,118 193

1,708 182

90 459 69

50 196 58

11 12
50 358 50

167 542 122

50 97 190

343 806 317

50 291 50

50 168 50

418 284 262

Galleria Way

50 83 169

Figure 27: Western Intersections Ambient 2020 Traffic Volumes AM Peak Hour

Chandler Village Drive North Chandler Village Drive South

527 1,246

Price Freeway (SR 101)

55 680

180 743 134

365 904

698 1,414

Frye Road 13 14

625 427

428 337

Madison Crossing

542 1,196

N N.T.S.

385 340

1,324

288 1,828

684 157

15

1,608

16
Price Road

San

18
Tan Free way (SR

202 )

2,078 86

17
Dobson Road
598 353
1,307 151

1,744 473

Figure 28: Southern Intersections Ambient 2020 Traffic Volumes AM Peak Hour

1,575 636

Madison Crossing

N.T.S.

Chandler Boulevard 7
134 1,932 129

109 1,742 84

263 1,388 253

55 86 123

197 1,281 194

6
341 1,601 294
311 76 132 277 905 267

Ellis Street

Dobson Road

124 1,441 242

SITE
1
8 1 3

21 20 Frye Road
156 343 125

4
256 559 254

5
198 1,223 78

870 7

Benson Lane
1,138 24 50 1,001 245
70 20

50 502 50

236 243 117

111 135 50

120 1,492 563

Pecos Road 19
109 906 201

356 462 667

Figure 29: Adjacent Intersections Ambient 2020 Traffic Volumes PM Peak Hour

115 719 579

Madison Crossing

50 1,112 470

50 87 50

Chandler Boulevard 9 8

N N.T.S.

10
50 2,115 595
402 50 341 856 770 641

1,229 503

2,253 336

90 410 81

51 236 107

11 12
50 719 50

363 423 410

50 72 230

602 687 202

106 606 110

165 245 87

658 735 444

Galleria Way

74 80 407

Figure 30: Western Intersections Ambient 2020 Traffic Volumes PM Peak Hour

Chandler Village Drive North Chandler Village Drive South

645 1,490

Price Freeway (SR 101)

252 1,012

222 671 286

811 2,015

222 902

Frye Road 13 14

943 694

802 602

Madison Crossing

781 2,094

N N.T.S.

414 253

2,319

325 2,094

779 484

15

728

16
Price Road

San

18
Tan Free way (SR

202 )

2,078 567

17
Dobson Road
598 448
2,462 424

1,747 473

Figure 31: Southern Intersections Ambient 2020 Traffic Volumes PM Peak Hour

867 894

Madison Crossing

This analysis reveals that the Benson Lane and Frye Road intersection (#2) does not satisfy the warrants for traffic signal installation with the existing traffic conditions.

Signal Warrant Analysis Ambient without Site

The MUTCD process was also utilized to determine if a signal is likely to be warranted at the Benson Lane and Frye Road intersection (#2) in the ultimate year 2020 with the proposed site conditions. The warrants presuppose that a minimum of 16 hours of traffic counts are available. Only the ambient 2020 without site daily and peak hourly traffic volumes can be estimated directly. Only three of the eight MUTCD warrants can utilize estimated traffic volumes to provide an indication of the likely need for a traffic signal at a particular location. Three hourly volumes are necessary to analyze these three warrants the hour with the highest traffic volumes, the hour with the fourth highest volume, and the hour with the eighth highest volume. The peak hourly volume has been estimated from the daily volume as described in the section of this report entitled Existing Traffic Counts. The fourth and eighth highest hourly volumes can be estimated from the peak hourly volume or the daily volume. The percentages of the day and peak hour traffic arriving in the fourth highest and eighth highest hours for intersection #2 are provided in Appendix A.1. For each intersection approach, the fourth highest hourly volume and the eighth highest hourly volume were estimated as the maximum of three calculations utilizing the appropriate percentage of the daily volume, the morning peak hourly volume, and the evening peak hourly volume. Finally, to provide more appropriate results, the right-turn traffic volumes on minor streets or approaches were reduced from the volumes required in the traffic warrant analysis as this movement can typically be accommodated without a traffic signal. Appendix C.2 provides the results of the ambient 2020 plus site signal warrant analysis for intersection #2. The results are summarized in Table 4. Table 4: Ambient without Site Signal Warrant Summary

Warrant Benson Lane and Frye Road (Access 2)

1A NO

Warrants Satisfied? 1B 2 3B - AM NO NO NO

3B - PM YES

Based on these analyses, a traffic signal should be warranted at the intersection of Benson Lane and Frye Road. However, it was noticed in Appendix C.2 that the 3B PM warrant was marginally satisfied (80 estimated vehicles versus 75 required vehicles) and therefore it was decided to evaluate when the other warrants would be satisfied, starting from the existing traffic volume counted for this project and reported in Appendix A.1. Table 5 provides the percent increase of the existing traffic volumes that would generate the satisfaction of the appropriate traffic signal warrant. Based on these variable results, it is recommended that a traffic signal

Madison Crossing

not be installed at this intersection. Regular monitoring of traffic volumes and vehicle delay is necessary to determine if and when a traffic signal should be installed. Table 5: Signal Warrant Satisfaction Threshold at Benson Lane Frye Road Intersection

Existing Volume Warrant 1A 1B 2 3B - AM 3B - PM Percent Increase 190% 50% 30% 100% 10%

Level-of-Service Analysis without Site

The ability of a transportation system to transmit the transportation demand is characterized as its level-of-service (LOS). Level-of-service is a rating system from A, representing the best operation, to F, representing the worst operation. Typically, level-of-service D is considered the minimum acceptable operation. The appropriate reference for level-of-service operation is the Highway Capacity Manual, published by the Transportation Research Board. This manual considers the average delay per vehicle as the measure to determine the level-ofservice for both signalized and unsignalized intersections. For signalized intersections the delay and level-of-service are calculated for the intersection, each approach, and each turning movement. For unsignalized intersections the level-of-service is defined for each minor movement for two-way stop controls, and is not defined for the major street approaches or for the intersection as a whole Table 6 lists the level-of-service criteria for both signalized and unsignalized intersections as stated in the Highway Capacity Manual. Table 6: Level-of-Service Criteria for Signalized Intersections

LEVEL-OF-SERVICE

A B C D E F

AVERAGE DELAY (seconds/vehicle) SIGNALIZED UNSIGNALIZED 10 10 > 10 to 20 > 10 to 15 > 20 to 35 > 15 to 25 > 35 to 55 > 25 to 35 > 55 to 80 > 35 to 50 > 80 > 50

Madison Crossing

Synchro software was utilized to calculate the average delay and level-of-service. The input and output for these analyses are provided as Appendix D to this report, and the results are summarized on the following pages. Each of the existing intersections was analyzed for its level-of-service for the existing traffic volume, traffic control, and lane configuration. Appendix D provides the complete results of these analyses. Appendix D.1 provides the results for the existing 2006 traffic volumes and Appendix D.2 provides the results for the ambient 2020 without site traffic volumes. Synchro provides calculated average delay exceeding 120 seconds per vehicle. The equations for these delay calculations are accurate only for delays less than 60 seconds. The equations provide reasonably accurate results for delays between 60 and 120 seconds. Calculated delay greater than 120 seconds are very exaggerated. Therefore, all calculated average delay greater than 120 seconds per vehicle were reduced to 120 seconds per vehicle. This adjustment becomes particularly meaningful when a specific movement is calculated to experience very high delay and thereby greatly exaggerates the corresponding approach delay and intersection delay. Tables of these adjustments are provided for the appropriate intersections in Appendix D.3. Figure 32 through Figure 43 provide the existing and ambient 2020 without site level-ofservice for the study intersections for the morning and evening peak hours, respectively. As stated before, the Benson Lane and Frye Road intersection was not improved and thus it shows that the PM peak hour northbound approach has level-of-service F.

Madison Crossing

B B B B B
N N.T.S.

B B B B B B B B B B C C

B B B B B B B B B

C B

Chandler Boulevard 7 6

Dobson Road

Ellis Street
A

A A A A A A A A

B C B D C C B B B B B A C

SITE
2 4

A A

5 Frye Road
B

C A STOP

Benson Lane

B B B B B B

Figure 32: Existing 2006 Level-of-Service Adjacent Intersections AM Peak Hour

STOP

A D B B B

B B

Pecos Road 19

Madison Crossing

B B
N

B B D B B C A A B B

C B B

N.T.S.

B B

B B

Chandler Boulevard 10
C B D B B C B B

Chandler Village Drive North

B B B B A A A A A A B B B A B A

B B

D B B C

Price Freeway (SR 101)

B B B A A C B B A A A B B B B B

11 12 13 14

Frye Road

A A A A A A A A A A A A A A C A

B B B

Figure 33: Existing 2006 Level-of-Service Western Intersections AM Peak Hour

Chandler Village Drive South

A A

Galleria Way

Madison Crossing

N N.T.S.

B B B B B B B A B A A A B B B

15

16
Price Road

San

18
Tan Free way (S

R 20

2)

A A C

17
A B B B A A A A

Dobson Road

A A A

A A

Figure 34: Existing 2006 Level-of-Service Southern Intersections AM Peak Hour

Madison Crossing

B B B B B
N N.T.S.

C C C B C D D C C C C C

B B B B A B B B B

C C

Chandler Boulevard 7 6

Dobson Road

Ellis Street
A

A B A A A A A A

B C B C C C B C B B B A C

SITE
2 4

A A

5 Frye Road
B

C B STOP

Benson Lane

B B B B B B

Figure 35: Existing 2006 Level-of-Service Adjacent Intersections PM Peak Hour

STOP

A F B B B

B B

Pecos Road 19

Madison Crossing

C D
N

A C D C C D B A C B

D B C

N.T.S.

C C

C D

Chandler Boulevard 10
C C D B B D C B

Chandler Village Drive North

B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B

C B

D B B C

Price Freeway (SR 101)

B B B B B C B C B B B B B C C B

11 12 13 14

Frye Road

B B B C B B B B C B A A A B C B

B B B

Figure 36: Existing 2006 Level-of-Service Western Intersections PM Peak Hour

Chandler Village Drive South

B B

Galleria Way

Madison Crossing

N N.T.S.

B B B C C B B A C A A A B B B

15

16
Price Road

San

18
Tan Free way (S

R 20

2)

B A D

17
C C C C C C B A

Dobson Road

A A A

A A

Figure 37: Existing 2006 Level-of-Service Southern Intersections PM Peak Hour

Madison Crossing

B B B B C
N N.T.S.

C C C C C C D

B C D C C

B C C B B B B B C

D C B D C C B

Chandler Boulevard 7 6

Dobson Road

Ellis Street
A

B B B A A A A C

C C D C C D C C C C C C C C C

SITE
2
C C
STOP

B B

5 Frye Road
D

F A STOP

Benson Lane

D E D E D D

B F E B E C D D D D D

Pecos Road 19

Figure 38: Ambient 2020 Level-of-Service Adjacent Intersections AM Peak Hour

Madison Crossing

C B
N

B C D B C D B A C B

D C C

N.T.S.

C B

C C

Chandler Boulevard 10
C C D B C D C D

Chandler Village Drive North

B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B

C B

C C D

Price Freeway (SR 101)

B B B B B C B C B B B B B B B B

11 12 13 14

Frye Road

B B B B A B B B B B B B B A D B

B B B

Figure 39: Ambient 2020 Level-of-Service Western Intersections AM Peak Hour

Chandler Village Drive South

B B

Galleria Way

Madison Crossing

N N.T.S.

B B B B B B B A C A B A B B B

15

16
Price Road

San

18
Tan Free way (S

R 20

2)

B B C

17
B C B B B B B A

Dobson Road

A A A

A A

Figure 40: Ambient 2020 Level-of-Service Southern Intersections AM Peak Hour

Madison Crossing

C B C C C
N N.T.S.

D D C C C C D

C D E D D

C C C B D C C C D

E D C E C C C

Chandler Boulevard 7 6

Dobson Road

Ellis Street
B

B B B A A A B A

C C D C C D C C C C C E C C C

SITE
2
C C
STOP

C B

5 Frye Road
D

E B STOP

Benson Lane

C E C E D D

A F F B D D D C E D D

Pecos Road 19

Figure 41: Ambient 2020 Level-of-Service Adjacent Intersections PM Peak Hour

Madison Crossing

C D
N

B D E B C D B A C C

D D D

N.T.S.

D C

D D

Chandler Boulevard 10
D D E B C E D E

Chandler Village Drive North

B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B

D C

D D D

Price Freeway (SR 101)

B B B B B D C C C C B B B C C C

11 12 13 14

Frye Road

C C C C B C D C C C C D B A C C

B C C

Figure 42: Ambient 2020 Level-of-Service Western Intersections PM Peak Hour

Chandler Village Drive South

C C

Galleria Way

Madison Crossing

N N.T.S.

B B B C C B B B C B B A B B B

15

16
Price Road

San

18
Tan Free way (S

R 20

2)

B A D

17
C D D D C C C A

Dobson Road

A A A

A A

Figure 43: Ambient 2020 Level-of-Service Southern Intersections PM Peak Hour

Proposed Site Trip Generation

The estimated trip generation for the proposed Countrywide project was determined through the procedures and data contained within the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation, 7th Edition, published in 2003. This document provides traffic volume data from existing developments throughout North America that can be utilized to estimate vehicle trips that might be generated from proposed developments. The traffic data are provided for 152 different categories. The estimated traffic volume is dependent upon independent variables defined by the characteristics and size of each land use category.

Madison Crossing

There is considerable data for office developments. Seven different land use categories are provided General Office, Corporate Headquarters, Single Tenant, Medical-Dental Office, Office Park, Research & Development, and Business Park. The two most appropriate land use categories for this proposed development are Corporate Headquarters (Code 714) and Single Family Tenant (Code 715). The most readily available and appropriate independent variables for office developments are the building size in 1,000 square feet and the number of employees. Trips can be determined utilizing an average trip generation rate or a regression equation. Appendix E.1 provides the pertinent excerpts from Trip Generation. These excerpts provide graphs for each land use code, each independent variable, and each time period of the data from the various studies. These graphs plot the average rate line and the regression equation line. In each case, the regression equation line is closer to the building size and the number of employees for Countrywide than is the average rate line. Therefore, the regression equation line was utilized for this analysis. Countrywide employees arrive throughout a four-hour period in the morning and depart throughout a four-hour period in the afternoon. Error! Reference source not found. provides the approximate percentage of employee arrivals and departures by hour. Table 7: Employee Arrival and Departure Times

TIME PERIOD 5:00 to 6:00 AM 6:00 to 7:00 AM 7:00 to 8:00 AM 8:00 to 9:00 AM 2:00 to 3:00 PM 3:00 to 4:00 PM 4:00 to 5:00 PM 5:00 to 6:00 PM

PORTION OF EMPLOYEES 10% 15% 40% 35% 10% 15% 40% 35%

To ensure a conservative analysis, the total number of employees was utilized to estimate the daily traffic volume. The number of employees arriving in the highest arrival hour and departure hour was utilized to estimate the peak hourly traffic volume. The estimate for peak hour site traffic volume was based on 40% of the total employees. This will ensure that the site accesses accommodate the peak period arrival and departure volumes. Appendix E.2 provides the complete results of the trip generation calculations. Table 8 provides a summary of the calculations.

Madison Crossing

Table 8: Weekday Traffic Volume Calculation Details

DAY LAND USE Corporate Headquarters Corporate Headquarters Single Tenant Single Tenant INDEPENDENT VARIABLE Building Area Employees Building Area Employees MAXIMUM SIZE 549,000 3,429 549,000 3,429 ENTERING 2,113 3,431 1,656 3,648 3,648 EXITING 2,112 3,431 1,655 3,648 3,648 AM PEAK HOUR LAND USE Corporate Headquarters Corporate Headquarters Single Tenant Single Tenant INDEPENDENT VARIABLE Building Area Employees Building Area Employees MAXIMUM SIZE 549,000 1,372 549,000 1,372 ENTERING 721 565 831 626 626 EXITING 54 42 103 77 77 PM PEAK HOUR LAND USE Corporate Headquarters Corporate Headquarters Single Tenant Single Tenant INDEPENDENT VARIABLE Building Area Employees Building Area Employees MAXIMUM SIZE 549,000 1,372 549,000 1,372 ENTERING 66 55 130 98 98 EXITING 598 442 739 552 552 TOTAL 664 497 869 650 650 TOTAL 775 607 934 703 703 TOTAL 4,225 6,862 3,311 7,296 7,296

Proposed Site Trip Distribution

The final determination related to site traffic is the direction the generated traffic utilizes to enter and exit the site. The site was examined to determine the probable routes for its traffic. Figure 44 and Figure 45 provide the percentage of site traffic entering and exiting the site from the external streets for the daily, morning and evening peak hours. Figure 46 through Figure 54 provide the resulting site directional daily traffic as well as the morning and evening peak hour turning movement volumes. Figure 55 through Figure 63 provide the resulting 2020 ambient with site directional daily traffic as well as the morning and evening peak hour turning movement volumes.

Madison Crossing

LEGEND

AM
N

PM

N.T.S.

12%

12%

12%

12%

15% 15% 10 16% 16% 9 8 7 6

4%

4%
13% 13%

4%

4%

6%

6%

6%

Chandler Boulevard

6%

3%

3%

4%

4%
4% 4% 3% 3%

Price Freeway (SR 101)

Chandler Village Drive North

Dobson Road

Ellis Street

1% 2%

1%
11

1%

1% 3% 3%
12

SITE
1 2 3

21

3%

3%
13 14

20 4

Frye Road
5

7% 7%

2% 13% 10% 3% 13%

15

Galleria Way

2% 10%
16

2%

7% 7%

3%

3%

10% 10%

3%

3%

Benson Lane

Pecos Road
19

3% 3%

3% 3%

15 16

San

Tan

Free

way

(SR

202 )
18

Price Road

7% 7%

3%

3%

3%

Figure 44: Site Traffic Trip Distribution AM and PM

7%

7%
17

3%

3%

3%

3%

Madison Crossing

N N.T.S.

12%

12%

4%

4%

6%

6%

3%

4%

16% 10 16% 9 8 7 6

4%

Chandler Boulevard
Dobson Road Ellis Street

3%

Price Freeway (SR 101)

Chandler Village Drive North

13%

1%

1% 3% 3%

SITE
1 2 3

21

20

11 12
2% 13% 2% 3% 3%

Frye Road
13 14 4 5

7%

7%

Benson Lane Galleria Way

Pecos Road
19

3%

3%

15 15 10%
10%

16

San
Price Road

Tan F

reew

ay ( S

R 20

2)
18

7%

16

3%

3%

7%

17
3% 3%

Figure 45: Site Traffic Trip Distribution - Day

Madison Crossing

219

219

109

N.T.S.

Chandler Boulevard

511

146

146

146

146

7
511
876 876

6
146 146
109 109 109

109

876

876

Dobson Road

730

Ellis Street

511

730
511 511

547

547
693 693

1,021

912

1,933

1,131

20 Frye Road 1 2 3 4

511

109

SITE
1,021

21

511

255

1,933

5
511
146 146 146

255

693

1,094

985

Benson Lane
657

657

693

511

1,131

657 1,021 657

328 328

511

Pecos Road

328

146

109

19
328
365 365

109

365

657

365

657

657

657

Figure 46: Adjacent Streets Site Traffic Directional Day

Madison Crossing

146

146

584

547

Chandler Boulevard 9 8

N.T.S.

10
584
182 182

547
438

547

547

547
474

511

SOUTHERNPACIF

1,459

474

Chandler Village Drive North

438

Price Freeway (SR 101)

547

511

511
474

511

1,933

RAILOD

985
948 109

1,933

36

36

11
292

292

109

511

Frye Road 13 14

182

12
292
109

511
109

182
73 73

292

Figure 47: Western Streets Site Traffic Directional Day

948

Chandler Village Drive South

511

474

Galleria Way

1,459

511

985

Madison Crossing

948

N N.T.S.

474

948

365

365

474

584

365

255

365

15

109

16
Price Road

San

18
Tan Free way (SR

202 )

474

584

17
Dobson Road
365

474

365

109

109

109

255
109 109

Figure 48: Southern Streets Site Traffic Directional Day

Madison Crossing

38

13 6

N.T.S.

Chandler Boulevard 7
94 56

25

13 13

6
11 5 3 2 1
2 2

88

Ellis Street

Dobson Road

12 4

31 7

19 22

19

19

SITE
157 175

21 20 Frye Road
44

63 34

31 29
4

1
44 25

4
2 5 3 38 50

5
25
6 13

15

Benson Lane
125 50 22 6 2

27 5 5

19 38

Pecos Road 19
31 65 2 5

2 1

31 26

Figure 49: Adjacent Intersections Site Traffic Volumes AM Peak Hour

44 19

Madison Crossing

2 9

6 19

Chandler Boulevard 10
75 25

N N.T.S.

9
50 25 3 1
12

63 31

1 4 2

11 12

2 6 2

19

163

13

31

81

Galleria Way

19

Chandler Village Drive North

50

3 8

Price Freeway (SR 101)

169

4 6
10 31

88

Frye Road 13 14

Figure 50: Western Intersections Site Traffic Volumes AM Peak Hour

Chandler Village Drive South

11 20

88

Madison Crossing

N N.T.S.

10 10

63

100

44

15

19

16
Price Road

San

18
Tan Free way (SR

202 )

2 8

17
Dobson Road
2 5

81
19

Figure 51: Southern Intersections Site Traffic Volumes AM Peak Hour

19

Madison Crossing

2 1

N.T.S.

Chandler Boulevard 7
15 9

2 2

6
77 33 22 11 6

11 11

14

Ellis Street

Dobson Road

83 28
5 50

912

55 1,021

20
912 1,021

SITE
1
7 47
110 55

21
7

Frye Road 2 3 4
17 39 22 6 8
20 33 33

10 27

5 32

28

5
4

Benson Lane
20 8 25 44 17

3 6

1 2

Pecos Road 19
7 3

5 26

28

28

11 39

5 58

Figure 52: Adjacent Intersections Site Traffic Volumes PM Peak Hour

17 6

Madison Crossing

17 66

1 3

Chandler Boulevard 9 8

N N.T.S.

10
12 4
22 6 8 4

83

10 5

6 28 11

11 12

17 44 17

25

13

Galleria Way

Chandler Village Drive North

8

22 55

Price Freeway (SR 101)

26

28 44

14

72 221

Frye Road 13 14

Figure 53: Western Intersections Site Traffic Volumes PM Peak Hour

Chandler Village Drive South

77 144

14

Madison Crossing

N N.T.S.

72 72

10

16

55

15

16

San

18

Tan

Free

Price Road

way

(SR

202 )
17

17 55

Dobson Road

13

17 39

Figure 54: Southern Intersections Site Traffic Volumes PM Peak Hour

Madison Crossing

17,084

N.T.S.

Chandler Boulevard

26,023

25,633

25,171

19,171

2,906

3,231

23,221

7
24,998
3,588 4,188 3,963 3,963

6
24,658 25,121
19,634 20,584 20,722

22,034

Dobson Road

3,823

730
3,823 3,598

547

547
4,006 3,781

1,021

912

15,308

14,506

20 Frye Road 1 2 3 4

9,223

19,497

SITE
11,446

21

3,598

730

Ellis Street

7,943

12,358

5
10,298
19,658 4,006 3,781 20,633 21,546

8,768

1,319

1,060

Benson Lane
14,782

14,244

10,123

14,506

12,869
2,516 4,741

11,198
18,746

11,446
475 825

12,332

Pecos Road

10,528

23,209

19
9,128
21,865 20,865

18,009

365

14,513

365

14,513

12,600

12,600

Figure 55: Adjacent Streets 2020 with Site Traffic Directional Day

Madison Crossing

1,346

1,046

24,984

25,647

Chandler Boulevard 9 8
31,738

N.T.S.

10
31,184 30,447

7,382

5,682

27,547

21,347

28,547

36,411

17,674

15,559

12,874

Chandler Village Drive North

28,338

Price Freeway (SR 101)

21,347

25,861

36,411

25,161

SOUTHERNPACIF

12,574
12,683 12,485 13,083

RAILOD

4,684

4,911

4,761

11
6,967

7,317

5,134

13,986

16,348

Frye Road 13 14

6,707

12
6,867 12,836

4,634

6,257

6,417

4,298

4,048

14,461

16,374

Galleria Way

4,384

Figure 56: Western Streets 2020 with Site Traffic Directional Day

18,248

Chandler Village Drive South

15,559

13,261

12,485

Madison Crossing

27,248

N N.T.S.

8,174

27,548

7,865

20,565

22,774

23,384

22,165

11,655

23,465

15

13,409

16
Price Road

San

18
Tan Free way (SR

202 )

22,774

23,384

17
Dobson Road
23,465

7,574
20,459 21,859

8,365

13,409

10,855
20,709 21,509

Figure 57: Southern Streets 2020 with Site Traffic Directional Day

Madison Crossing

50 105 57

N.T.S.

Chandler Boulevard 7
50 1,366 241

171 842 130

83 1,452 200

176 1,310 184

6
323 1,155 228

271 1,027 184

94 266

98 89 54

Ellis Street

Dobson Road

12 4
31 543

19 959

19

20
157 882

Frye Road 1
48 913 45
22 1 10

166 924 167

SITE
2 3

21
250 569 153

63 571

31 238

4
109 378 137 192 734 50
77 114 55

5
364 1,752 69

Benson Lane
132 696 54 175 573 52
43 1 34

254 267 66

Pecos Road 19
31 1,034 50 380 55

1,053 865 758

124 636 244

31 796

Figure 58: Adjacent Intersections 2020 with Site Traffic Volumes AM Peak Hour

207 1,634 567

Madison Crossing

52 1,687 216

50 56 69

Chandler Boulevard 9 8

N N.T.S.

10
50 1,638 246

471 51 259

579 855 755

1,130 193

1,771 213

91 463 71

50 196 64

11 12
50 408 50

169 548 124

50 97 209

343 806 480

50 322 50

50 168 63

418 284 343

Galleria Way

50 83 187

Figure 59: Western Intersections 2020 with Site Traffic Volumes AM Peak Hour

Chandler Village Drive North Chandler Village Drive South

530 1,253

Price Freeway (SR 101)

55 849

184 749 134

375 934

698 1,502

Frye Road 13 14

636 447

516 337

Madison Crossing

552 1,206

N N.T.S.

448 340

1,331

288 1,928

728 157

15

1,627

16

San

18

Tan

Free

Price Road

way

(SR

202 )
17

2,080 94

Dobson Road

353

1,763 473

679

1,310 156

Figure 60: Southern Intersections 2020 with Site Traffic Volumes AM Peak Hour

1,594 636

Madison Crossing

N.T.S.

Chandler Boulevard 7
134 1,932 142

109 1,742 88

265 1,389 253

55 92 123

197 1,283 196

6
352 1,612 294

15 605

389 109 154

83 28

5 284

55

127 1,441 242

SITE
1
7 917 7

21 20 Frye Road
156 350 125

10 262

5 628

28

4
273 598 276 56 510 50

5
202 1,223 78
357 464 667

118 1 58

Benson Lane
20 1,146 24 75 1,045 262

70

20

257 276 150

114 140 50

Pecos Road 19
5 876 109 917 240

28

28

120 1,508 569

5 1,355

Figure 61: Adjacent Intersections 2020 with Site Traffic Volumes PM Peak Hour

122 722 579

277 916 273

Ellis Street

Dobson Road

Madison Crossing

67 1,178 470

50 88 53

Chandler Boulevard 9 8

N N.T.S.

10
50 2,127 599

424 56 341

856 778 645

1,312 503

2,262 340

96 437 92

51 236 108

11 12
50 727 50

379 468 427

50 72 233

602 687 228

106 611 110

165 245 89

658 735 457

Galleria Way

74 80 410

Figure 62: Western Intersections 2020 with Site Traffic Volumes PM Peak Hour

Chandler Village Drive North Chandler Village Drive South

667 1,545

Price Freeway (SR 101)

252 1,038

250 715 286

294 1,123

811 2,029

Frye Road 13 14

1,020 837

815 602

Madison Crossing

853 2,166

N N.T.S.

423 253

2,375

325 2,110

786 484

15

731

16
Price Road

San

18
Tan Free way (SR

202 )

2,094 622

17
Dobson Road
611 448
2,479 462

1,750 473

Figure 63: Southern Intersections 2020 with Site Traffic Volumes PM Peak Hour

869 894

Madison Crossing

Signal Warrant Analysis with Site

The MUTCD process was also utilized to determine if a signal is likely to be warranted at the four site accesses (two additional accesses on Frye Road and two accesses on Ellis Street) in the ultimate year 2020 with the proposed site conditions. The percentages of the day and peak hour traffic arriving in the fourth and eighth highest hours used for these accesses are the average of the respective values for the seventeen (17) study intersections, provided in Appendix A. Appendix F provides the results of the ambient 2020 plus site signal warrant analysis for the four site accesses. The results are summarized in Table 9. Based on these analyses, traffic signals will not be warranted at any of the four site accesses with 2020 with site traffic conditions. Table 9: 2010 with Site Signal Warrant Summary

Warrants Satisfied? Warrant Access 1 and Frye Road Access 3 and Frye Road Access 20 and Ellis Road Access 21 and Ellis Road 1A NO NO NO NO 1B NO NO NO NO 2 NO NO NO NO 3B - AM NO NO NO NO 3B - PM NO NO NO NO

Level-of-Service Analysis with Site

The level-of-service for the 2020 conditions with the proposed development was analyzed, which include the seventeen (17) study intersections and the four (4) site accesses. Synchro software was utilized to calculate the average delay and level-of-service. The input and output for these analyses are provided as Appendix G to this report and the results are summarized on the following pages. Figure 64 through Figure 69 provide the results of the level-of-service analyses for the ultimate year 2020 with site conditions for the morning and evening peak hours, respectively. Each of these six figures indicates the necessary lane configurations to achieve the indicated and acceptable levels-of-service. At this time, a traffic signal is recommended for the Benson Lane and Frye Road intersection (#2) to accommodate all the southbound left turn movements generated by the proposed Countrywide development. Level-of-service D or better can be found at the other four site accesses serviced by stop signs.

Madison Crossing

C C D B B B C
N N.T.S.

C C C D

B C D C C

C B C C D B B C B C D C B

B D C C

Chandler Boulevard 7
Ellis Street

Dobson Road

B
STOP

C A
STOP

C C D C C D C C C C C D C C C

SITE
1
B B B

21
B

20 2 3 4

Frye Road
B B C B C C B B C C D C E

STOP

A A A

Benson Lane
B B B C

D D E D D

A A A B B B

C D

E D D D D D C

C
STOP

Pecos Road 19
-

Figure 64: Adjacent Intersections 2020 with Site Levels-of-Service AM Peak Hour

Madison Crossing

B B
N

B C D B C C B A B C C B

C C C

N.T.S.

C B

Chandler Boulevard 10
D C D B C D C D

Chandler Village Drive North

B B B B A B B B B B B B B B B B

C B

C C D

Price Freeway (SR 101)

B B B B B C B C B B B B B B B B

11 12 13 14

Frye Road

B B B B A B C B B B B B B A D B

B B B

Figure 65: Western Intersections 2020 with Site Levels-of-Service AM Peak Hour

Chandler Village Drive South

B B

Galleria Way

Madison Crossing

N N.T.S.

B B B C C B B A C A B A C B B

15

16
Price Road

San

18
Tan Free way (S

R 20

2)

B B C

17
B C B B B B B A

Dobson Road

A A A

A A

Figure 66: Southern Intersections 2020 with Site Levels-of-Service AM Peak Hour

Madison Crossing

D D D B C C C
N N.T.S.

D D C D

C D E D D

C C C C D B C D C D E D C

C E C C

Chandler Boulevard 7
Ellis Street

Dobson Road

B
STOP

C
A
STOP

C C D C C D C D C C C D C C C

SITE
1
B B B

21
C

20 2 3 4

Frye Road
C C C C B B B C A B D D E

STOP

A A A

Benson Lane
C C C C

C C E D D

A A A B B B

C D

D D C E D D D

D
STOP

Pecos Road 19
-

Figure 67: Adjacent Intersections 2020 with Site Levels-of-Service PM Peak Hour

Madison Crossing

D D
N

B D D D C D B A C D C C

C C C

N.T.S.

D C

Chandler Boulevard 10
D D D B C E D E

Chandler Village Drive North

B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B

D C

D D D

Price Freeway (SR 101)

B C B B B C C C C C B B C C C B

11 12 13 14

Frye Road

D D D D B C D B D C D D B B D C

C C C

Figure 68: Western Intersections 2020 with Site Levels-of-Service PM Peak Hour

Chandler Village Drive South

C C

Galleria Way

Madison Crossing

N N.T.S.

B B B C C C B B D B B A B B B

15

16
Price Road

San

18
Tan Free way (S

R 20

2)

B A D

17
C D D D D D C A

Dobson Road

A A A

A A

Figure 69: Southern Intersections 2020 with Site Levels-of-Service PM Peak Hour

Madison Crossing

Turn Lane Analysis with Site

Left-turn lanes were provided at all intersections with signals. Right-turn lanes were provided at intersections that the level-of-service analysis suggested their inclusion. Dual left-turn lanes and dual right-turn lanes were provided where traffic volumes suggested their inclusion. The typical methodology for determining the storage length of turn lanes is described on page 714 and 715 in the document Policy on Geometric Design of Highways and Streets, 2004 published by the American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials. This publication recommends that turn lanes accommodate 1.5 to 2.0 times the number of vehicles likely to arrive in a two-minute period. For this analysis, the right-turn lane lengths were determined by estimating the number of vehicles arriving in a two-minute period, multiplying by 1.5, multiplying by 25 feet for a vehicle length and clearance between vehicles, and approximating to the nearest 25 feet. Table 10 through Table 14 summarize the results of the turn lane requirement analyses. The taper length for right-turn lanes is typically approximately 8 feet to 15 feet longitudinally per 1 foot transversely (8:1 to 15:1). The recommended taper length is a 10:1 rate with an assumed lane width of 12 feet, which results in a taper length of 120 feet.

Madison Crossing

Table 10: Street Turn Lane Lengths

AM TURN VOLUME 1 - Access 1 & Frye Northbound Right Northbound Left Southbound Right Southbound Left Eastbound Right Eastbound Left Westbound Right Westbound Left 2 - Access 2 (Benson) & Frye Northbound Right Northbound Left Southbound Right Southbound Left Eastbound Right Eastbound Left Westbound Right Westbound Left 3 - Access 3 & Frye Northbound Right Northbound Left Southbound Right Southbound Left Eastbound Right Eastbound Left Westbound Right Westbound Left 4 - Ellis & Frye Northbound Right Northbound Left Southbound Right Southbound Left Eastbound Right Eastbound Left Westbound Right Westbound Left 5 - Dobson & Frye Northbound Right Northbound Left Southbound Right Southbound Left Eastbound Right Eastbound Left Westbound Right Westbound Left 0 0 19 0 0 157 19 0 34 43 22 10 54 132 48 45 0 0 4 4 0 31 31 0 66 254 77 55 52 175 192 50 69 364 166 167 137 109 250 153

PM TURN VOLUME 0 0 138 0 0 25 3 0 20 70 118 58 24 20 7 7 0 0 28 28 0 5 5 0 50 114 257 150 262 75 56 50 78 202 127 242 276 273 156 125

TURN LANES 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 2 0 2 1 1 1 1

TURN LANE LENGTH 0 0 0 0 0 50 0 0 0 100 0 75 0 25 0 25 0 0 0 0 0 25 0 0 0 150 325 200 0 100 0 75 0 150 0 175 350 350 200 175

Madison Crossing

Table 11: Street Turn Lane Lengths (continued)

AM TURN VOLUME 6 - Dobson & Chandler Northbound Right Northbound Left Southbound Right Southbound Left Eastbound Right Eastbound Left Westbound Right Westbound Left 7 - Ellis & Chandler Northbound Right Northbound Left Southbound Right Southbound Left Eastbound Right Eastbound Left Westbound Right Westbound Left 8 - NB Price & Chandler Northbound Right Northbound Left Southbound Right Southbound Left Eastbound Right Eastbound Left Westbound Right Westbound Left 9 - SB Price and Chandler Northbound Right Northbound Left Southbound Right Southbound Left Eastbound Right Eastbound Left Westbound Right Westbound Left 10 - Chandler Village Drive & Chandler Northbound Right Northbound Left Southbound Right Southbound Left Eastbound Right Eastbound Left Westbound Right Westbound Left 228 323 171 130 184 271 176 184 54 98 50 57 241 50 83 200 134 184 0 0 0 698 530 0 0 0 579 755 213 0 0 193 259 471 50 69 246 50 52 216

PM TURN VOLUME 273 277 265 253 294 352 197 196 154 389 55 123 142 134 109 88 286 250 0 0 0 811 667 0 0 0 856 645 340 0 0 503 341 424 50 53 599 50 67 470

TURN LANES 1 2 1 2 1 2 1 2 1 2 0 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 2 2 0 0 0 2 1 1 0 0 2 1 2 0 2 1 2 0 2

TURN LANE LENGTH 350 175 350 175 375 225 250 125 200 250 0 100 200 175 150 125 375 325 0 0 0 525 425 0 0 0 550 825 450 0 0 325 450 275 0 50 750 50 0 300

Madison Crossing

Table 12: Street Turn Lane Lengths (continued)

AM TURN VOLUME 11 - Chandler Village Drive & Frye Northbound Right Northbound Left Southbound Right Southbound Left Eastbound Right Eastbound Left Westbound Right Westbound Left 12 - Galleria & Frye Northbound Right Northbound Left Southbound Right Southbound Left Eastbound Right Eastbound Left Westbound Right Westbound Left 13 - SB Price & Frye Northbound Right Northbound Left Southbound Right Southbound Left Eastbound Right Eastbound Left Westbound Right Westbound Left 14 - NB Price & Frye Northbound Right Northbound Left Southbound Right Southbound Left Eastbound Right Eastbound Left Westbound Right Westbound Left 15 - Price & WB 202 Ramps Northbound Right Northbound Left Southbound Right Southbound Left Eastbound Right Eastbound Left Westbound Right Westbound Left 63 50 50 64 50 50 91 71 187 50 50 209 50 50 169 124 0 0 418 343 337 0 0 447 480 343 0 0 0 55 375 0 0 288 552 0 0 0 448 340

PM TURN VOLUME 89 165 51 108 110 106 96 92 410 74 50 233 50 50 379 427 0 0 658 457 602 0 0 837 228 602 0 0 0 252 294 0 0 325 853 0 0 0 423 253

TURN LANES 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 2 1 2 1 2 0 0 1 1 2 0 0 2 1 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 2 2

TURN LANE LENGTH 0 225 75 150 150 150 125 125 525 100 0 150 75 50 475 275 0 0 825 575 400 0 0 525 300 775 0 0 0 325 375 0 0 225 1,075 0 0 0 275 175

Madison Crossing

Table 13: Street Turn Lane Lengths (continued)

AM TURN VOLUME 16 - Price & EB 202 Ramps Northbound Right Northbound Left Southbound Right Southbound Left Eastbound Right Eastbound Left Westbound Right Westbound Left 17 - Dobson & EB 202 Ramp Northbound Right Northbound Left Southbound Right Southbound Left Eastbound Right Eastbound Left Westbound Right Westbound Left 18 - Dobson & WB 202 Ramp Northbound Right Northbound Left Southbound Right Southbound Left Eastbound Right Eastbound Left Westbound Right Westbound Left 19 - Dobson & Pecos Northbound Right Northbound Left Southbound Right Southbound Left Eastbound Right Eastbound Left Westbound Right Westbound Left 20 - Access 20 & Ellis Northbound Right Northbound Left Southbound Right Southbound Left Eastbound Right Eastbound Left Westbound Right Westbound Left 473 0 0 94 353 679 0 0 636 0 0 156 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 728 157 567 207 124 244 55 50 1,053 758 0 63 31 0 8 4 0 0

PM TURN VOLUME 473 0 0 622 448 611 0 0 894 0 0 462 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 786 484 579 122 120 569 240 109 357 667 0 10 5 0 55 28 0 0

TURN LANES 1 0 0 1 2 2 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 2 1 2 1 2 1 2 1 2 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0

TURN LANE LENGTH 600 0 0 800 300 400 0 0 1,125 0 0 600 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 500 325 725 100 175 375 300 75 450 425 0 25 0 0 0 0 0 0

Madison Crossing

Table 14: Street Turn Lane Lengths (continued)

AM TURN VOLUME 21 - Access 21 & Ellis Northbound Right Northbound Left Southbound Right Southbound Left Eastbound Right Eastbound Left Westbound Right Westbound Left 0 31 94 0 4 12 0 0

PM TURN VOLUME 0 5 15 0 28 83 0 0

TURN LANES 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0

TURN LANE LENGTH 0 25 0 0 0 0 0 0

Summary of Conclusions
Recommendations without the Countrywide Development Only the Benson Lane and Frye Road intersection (#2) is not currently signalized of the seventeen (17) existing intersections evaluated in this study. The traffic warrant analysis indicates that the existing traffic conditions without the proposed site at this intersection does not satisfy warrants for a traffic signal. By the ultimate year 2020, traffic conditions without the proposed development will satisfy the warrants for a traffic signal. The required lane configurations to provide acceptable levels-ofservice at the adjacent, western, and southern intersections without the proposed site for the ultimate year 2020 are provided in Figure 1 through Figure 3, respectively. Recommendations with the Countrywide Development The main site access on Frye Road intersection #2 should be monitored to determine if signalization is required. The estimated traffic volumes indicate that traffic signal warrants would be satisfied. The level-of-service analyses also indicate that the intersection would operate with unacceptable delay without a signal and with acceptable delay with a signal. However, the access will serve primarily visitors to the property not employees. Countrywide experiences relatively few visitors to its office. Most importantly, a traffic signal at this intersection would be disruptive for through traffic on Frye Road. Traffic warrant analysis was performed on the four (4) additional site accesses. None of the intersections had traffic conditions that would satisfy the warrants for traffic signals in the ultimate year 2020 with the proposed development. The required lane configurations to provide acceptable levels-of-service at the adjacent, western, and southern intersections are provided for the ultimate year 2020 with the proposed Countrywide development in Figure 4 through Figure 6.

Madison Crossing

The recommended lengths of the full-width turn-lanes are provided on Figure 7 through Figure 9 on the turn lane length diagrams. Parking spaces and parking aisles within the Countrywide development should not be located within the recommended turn-lane lengths.