Professional Documents
Culture Documents
The information in this document is subject to change without notice and describes only the product defined in the introduction of this documentation. This document is intended for the use of nokia siemens networks customers only for the purposes of the agreement under which the document is submitted, and no part of it may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or means without the prior written permission of Nokia Siemens Networks. The document has been prepared to be used by professional and properly trained personnel, and the customer assumes full responsibility when using it. Nokia Siemens Networks welcomes customer comments as part of the process of continuous development and improvement of the documentation. The information or statements given in this document concerning the suitability, capacity, or performance of the mentioned hardware or software products cannot be considered binding but shall be defined in the agreement made between Nokia Siemens Networks and the customer. However, Nokia Siemens Networks has made all reasonable efforts to ensure that the instructions contained in the document are adequate and free of material errors and omissions. Nokia Siemens Networks will, if necessary, explain issues which may not be covered by the document. Nokia Siemens Networks' liability for any errors in the document is limited to the documentary correction of errors. Nokia Siemens Networks will not be responsible in any event for errors in this document or for any damages, incidental or consequential (including monetary losses), that might arise from the use of this document or the information in it. This document and the product it describes are considered protected by copyright according to the applicable laws. Other product names mentioned in this document may be trademarks of their respective companies, and they are mentioned for identification purposes only.
Internal
2(17)
Document History
Document type: Creator: Reviewer: Approver: Version 1.0 Trial Guideline Pradeep Chattikal Harry Kuosa Prashant Agnihotri Version history Approved
Date 30.10.2009
Feature AMR Robust signalling (FACCH/SACCH) Progressive AMR power control AMR Unpacking Optimization
Internal
3(17)
Table of Contents
Document History ..................................................................................................................3
TU UT
1
TU UT TU
2
TU UT TU
3
TU UT TU
4
TU UT TU TU
4.1
UT
4.2
TU
4.3
TU
5
TU UT TU TU
5.2
TU TU
5.2.1
TU
5.2.2
TU UT TU
5.2.3
TU UT TU
5.3
TU UT
5.4
TU
5.5
TU
5.6
TU
6
TU UT TU TU
References .....................................................................................................................17
6.1
UT
6.2
TU
Abbreviations: ..................................................................................................................................... 17
TU UT
Internal
4(17)
3 Executive Summary
Traditionally AMR has been proposed as one of the major steps towards improving Spectral Efficiency due to increased robustness of AMR codecs. However operator feedbacks have been somewhat negative with increased dropped call rate, especially post implementation of AMR Half rate. With the introduction of AMR codecs, AMR users perceive improved voice quality thereby transmitting lesser power. However introducing AMR Half rate also increases signalling due to large number of Intracell handovers in the network. The associated SACCH & FACCH channels used for signalling are not as robust as the AMR voice codecs. This weak link leads to the increased dropped calls rate seen with AMR deployment. However starting BSS13 many improvements have been introduced that help improves the retainability of AMR calls and thereby fully utilize the benefits of robust codecs, leading to Improved Spectral efficiency. The benefits of these features are seen primarily in interfered or low coverage patches in networks. Hence this document tries to narrow down the scenarios under which these features can be successfully demonstrated to customer. The objective is also to clarify that some of these benefits will be visible network wide only with increase in traffic. This document covers the benefits of these AMR enhancement features 1) AMR Robust signalling 2) Progressive AMR power control 3) AMR Unpacking Optimization
Internal
5(17)
FACCH REPETITION & POWER OFFSET - DCR BEST CASE 1.8 1.6 1.4 1.2 DCR (%) . 1 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 EFL (%) 0 4 6 8 REFERENCE 10 12 R-FACCH 14 16 REDUCTION OF 20% ON DCR @ 12 % EFL INCREASE OF 18% ON CAPACITY @ 1% DCR
Fig.1: Simulations results indicate Dropped Call rate Improvement of around 20% by implementing Robust AMR signalling.
Field Results:
U
%ofCellsMeetingDCRThresholdCell )
1.99 1.61
Pre
Post
Fig.2: Field results indicate dropped call rate improvements in 10% to 20%. The results in this field trial indicates a dropped call rate improvement of 19% at BSC level
TCHDrop
Based on field results typically achieved gain of 10%-15% can be committed in interfered clusters. Please note the improvements in dropped call rate are generally influenced by the contribution of handover related drops in the overall dropped call rate. Higher the % of Handover related drops higher the possibility of improvements with AMR Robust signalling
Internal
6(17)
4.2
Fig.3: Simulations results have shown Dropped Call Rate Improvement of up to 50% with AMR PPC
Field Results:
U
Fig.4: The above field result indicates the improvement in % of cells that meet the 2% Dropped Call Rate threshold. Significant improvement of 20% seen at BSC level Typical Gains achieved with this feature:
U
Based on field results typically achieved gain of 15%-20% can be committed in highly interfered clusters. Please note the improvements in dropped call rate are heavily by influenced by the current power control settings. An aggressive power control setting before AMR PPC implementation can lead to minimized gains
Internal
7(17)
4.3
Fig.5: Simulation results indicate an improvement of around 25% at high traffic load (@ 12% EFL)
Field Results:
U
Fig.6: Field results indicate 30-40% in improvement in Intracell handover related drops, thereby contributing to 15% to 20% of overall Drop Call Rate %. Typical Gains achieved with this feature:
U
Based on field results typically achieved Dropped Call Rate improvement of 15% can be committed in networks with large % of AMR-HR traffic and a significant % of bad quality.
Internal
8(17)
5
en ts tra te gy
de pl o
ym
AM
AMR Half Rate introduces additional intracell handovers due to packing & unpacking of AMR-FR and AMR-HR calls respectively. These additional intracell handovers introduce possibilities of increased drop calls especially under bad radio conditions. To minimize these drops its highly recommended to deploy AMR Unpacking Optimisation along with AMR HR. Also while deploying AMR, its advisable to deploy AMR Full Rate across entire BSC, instead of AMR deployment at cluster level. AMR deployment at site or cluster level can improve link level performance for users, however system level improvements are only achieved with larger deployments of AMR where improved quality, reduced power and impacts overall Network level quality and retainability KPIs . Cluster level AMR deployment also leads to unnecessary A interface pool switchovers especially in cases where transcoders need separate pools to be defined for AMR & EFR site/cluster
AMR HR AMR FR
AMR HR AMR FR