Case 1:07-cv-00026-OWW-TAG Document 20 Filed 04/12/2007 Page 1 of 2

1 Mark A. Wasser CA SB #060160

ILAW OFFICES OF M..<\RK A. WASSER
2 '400 Dpitol Mal~ Suite 1100
Sacramento, CA 95814
3 i Phone: (916) 444-6400
, Fax: (916) 444-6405
4 E-mail: mwasserrii!markwasser.com
5 i Bernard C, Bannan, Sr.
KERN COUNTY COUNSEL
6 Mark Nations, Chief Deputy
1115 Truxton Avenue, Fourth Floor
7 Bakersfield, CA 93301
Phone: (661) 868-3800
II Fa'C: (661) 868-3805
E-mail: rnnations@cokem.ca.us
9
I Attorneys for Defendants County ofKem,
I Peter Bryan, Irwin Harris, Eugene Kercher,
II I Jennifer Abraham, Scott Ragland, Toni Smith
I and William Roy
12
13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
]4 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
]5
]6 DAVID F. JADWIN, D.O. ) Case No.: 1:07-cv-26
)
17 Plaimiff, ) STIPULATION REi SERVICE AND
' ) RESPONSE TO FIRST AMENDED
] 8 I) VS. ) COMPLAINT, SCHEDUUG OF RULE I
) 26(1) CONFERENCE AND MANDATORY
19 COUNTY OF KERN, et aI., ) SCHEDULING CONFERENCE AND
) ORDER
20 Defendants, )
11------------)
21
22 It is hereby stipulated by and between the parties hereto through their respective counsel
23 as fo Hows:
24 1. There are multiple Defendants in this action and they were not all served on the same

25 date but they were all served by April 6,2007 Given the varying service dates, the parties agree
26 that all the Defendants may file an answer to the First Amended Complaint on or before April

27 30, 2007. Plaintiff shall not be prejudiced with respect to the scheduling of discovery or trial.
28 //1
STiPULATION RE: SERVICE AND RESPONSE TO fIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT, SCHEDULING OF
RULE 26(1) CONFERENCE AND MANDATORY SCHEDULD<G CONFERENCE AND ORDER

1
 Case 1:07-cv-00026-OWW-TAG Document 20 Filed 04/12/2007 Page 2 of 2

1 2. Plaintiff may supplement his First Amended Complaint by adding factual allegations

2 regarding a letter from the California Labor Commissioner and some other matters. The

3 supplement will be filed on or before April 24, 2007.

4 3. The parties will conduct the Rule 26(f) Conference on May 4,2007 at a mutually

5 agreeable time and location.

6 4. In order that the parties have sufficient time to prepare effective initial disclosures and

7 a disoovery plan, the parties request that the Court re-schedule the Mandatory Scheduling

8 Conference to May 31, 2007.

9
I
Dated, April.J.L.., 2007 LAW OFFICES OF MARK. A. WASSER

III
]2
13 Mark A. Wasser
Attorney for Defendants, County of Kern, et al.
14

15
Dated: April 11 ,2007 LAW OFFICE OF EUGENE LEE
16
]7 By:._ _++-"-'--J.L .-J _

18
E e D. Lee
19 Attorney for Plaintiff, David Jadwin, D.O.

20
ORDER
21
22 The parties having stipulated as hereinabove set forth and good cause appearing
therefore;
23
IT IS SO ORDERED. The Mandatory Scheduling Conference is reset to _
24

25 Dated: April_, 2007 Ul\UED STATES DISTRICT COURT

26 By: _
27 The Honorable Oliver W. Wanger
28 United States District Court Judge

STIPULAnON RE: SERVICE AND RESPONSE TO FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT, SCHEDULING OF

RULE 26(1) CONFERENCE AND MANDATORY SCHEDULING CONFERENCE AND ORDER