You are on page 1of 2

Case 1 :08-cv-00675-LY Document 222 Filed 09/25/13 Page 1of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS AUSTIN DIVISION v. THE TEXAS MEDICAL BOARD, ROBERTA M. KALAFUT, INDIVIDUALLY AND IN HER OFFICIAL CAPACITY; MICHAEL ARAMBULA, INDIVIDUALLY AND IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY; JULIE K. ATTEBURY, INDIVIDUALLY AND IN HER OFFICIAL CAPACITY; PATRICIA S. BLACKWELL, INDIVIDUALLY AND IN HER OFFICIAL CAPACITY; MANUAL G. GUARJARDO, INDIVIDUALLY AND IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY; MELINDA MCMICHAEL, INDIVIDUALLY AND IN HER OFFICIAL CAPACITY; MARGARET MCNEESE, INDIVIDUALLY AND IN HER OFFICIAL CAPACITY; PAULETTE BARKER SOUTHARD, INDIVIDUALLY AND IN HER OFFICIAL CAPACITY; TIMOTHY WEBB, INDIVIDUALLY AND IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY; IRVIN E. ZEITLER, INDIVIDUALLY AND IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY; AND JOHN DOES 1-10, WHO ARE WORKING FOR THE TEXAS MEDICAL BOARD, INDIVIDUALLY AND IN THEIR OFFICIAL CAPACITIES, DEFENDANTS. THE ASSOCIATION OF AMERICAN PHYSICIANS & SURGEONS, INC., PLAINTIFF,

2013 SEP 25 PM 2: I 6

CIVIL NO. A-08-CV-675-LY

FINAL JUDGMENT
Before the court is the above styled and numbered cause. On December 9, 2011, the court dismissed Plaintiff The Association of Physicians & Surgeons, Inc.' s ("Association") claims alleged against Defendant the Texas Medical Board ("Board") as those claims were barred by Eleventh

Case 1 :08-cv-00675-LY

Document 222

Filed 09/25/13

Page 2 of 2

Amendment immunity; and dismissed for failure to state a claim for which relief may be granted the Association's claims alleged against all Board members other than Defendant Roberta Kalafut , in their individual capacities, claims alleged against Defendants John Doe, and claims alleging that Defendants violated the Association physician members' Sixth Amendment rights under the Confrontation Clause. On this date by Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law the court found and concluded that the Association should be denied all of the relief requested and that the Association take nothing by this action. As nothing remains for the court to resolve, the court renders the following final judgment pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 58. IT IS ORDERED that by this action, Plaintiff The Association of Physicians & Surgeons, Inc. TAKE NOTHING by its action against Defendants. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendants are awarded costs of court. Any issues regarding attorney's fees incurred in this action will be determined post judgment and pursuant to Rule CV-7G), of the Local Rules of the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas. SIGNED this

ZJ'tf.

day of September, 2013.

You might also like