27

CHAPTER IV
THE RESULT OF THE RESEARCH

A. Description of The Data
Data is a collection of facts such as value or measurement. It can be
numbers, words, and others. In this chapter, the writer describes the result of
the research after applied the instrument to the eighth grade of MTs Al-
Mukhtariyah Nagasaribu Padang Lawas Utara as the respondent. The result
describes as follows:
1. Teaching Speaking by Using Audio Lingual Method
From the score calculation, it is found that the highest score is 90
and the lowest score is 35. The averages score is 70, median is 69.37 and
mode is 69.50. Then, the score of mean, median and mode can be seen in
the following table :
Table 2
The Score of Mean, Median and Mode of Teaching Speaking
by Using Audio Lingual Method

No Name Score
1 Mean 70
2 Median 69.37
3 Mode 69.50


The average score of speaking by using audio lingual method is 70
and predicated Good. It means that many of the students are able to
answer the tests. To see the position of mean score, it can be drawn in the
following figure :


27
28




Figure 1: The Position of the Mean Score of Teaching Speaking by
Using Audio Lingual Method at the Eighth Grade Students of
MTs Al- Mukhtariyah Nagasaribu Padang Lawas Utara


After finding the mean, median and mode the writer analyze the
students achievement based on the indicators as follows:
a. The students ability at the eighth grade of MTs Al-Mukhtariyah
Nagasaribu Padang Lawas Utara identify the vocabulary is categorized
good. It is shown from the score of the students achievement
665/750 x 100 = 88.67
b. The students ability at eighth grade of MTs Al- Mukhtariyah
Nagasaribu Padang Lawas Utara identify the pronuncation is
categorized enough. It is shown from the score of the students
achievement 500/750 x 100 = 66,67
c. The students ability at the eighth grade of MTs Al- Mukhtariyah
Nagasaribu Padang Lawas Utara identify the fluency is categorize
fail. Its shown from the score of students achievement, 585/1000 x
100 = 58,5
Furthermore, the frequency distribution of teaching speaking by
using audio lingual method can be described below :

50

53, 20
0
50
100
70
29

Table 3
The Frequency Distribution of Teaching Speaking by Using
Audio Lingual Method at at the Eighth Grade Students
of MTs Al- Mukhtariyah Nagasaribu
Padang Lawas Utara

No Interval Frequency
Cumulative
Frequency
Percentage
(%)
Mid Point
1 35 45 1 1 4 33.5 45.5
2 46 56 3 4 12 45.5 56.5
3 57 67 6 10 24 56.5 67.5
4 68 78 8 18 32 67.5 78.5
5 79 89 4 22 16 78.5 89.5
6 90 100 3 25 12 89.5 99.5
Total 25 100%

Based on the table above, it can be seen that there are six interval
classes with its interval is eleven. The first is 35 44 and there are only one
student or 4 % from the total of frequency, second is 46 56 and there are 3
students or 12 % from the total of frequency, third is 57 67 and there are 6
students or 24 % from the total of the frequency, fourth is 68 78 and there
are 8 students or 32 %, the fifth is 79 89 and there are 3 students or 12 %
from the total of frequency, the sixth is 90 99 and there are 3 students or 12
% from the total of frequency.
The description of the normality of the data described in the following
histogram:

30











Figure 2 : Histogram Frequency of Teaching Speaking by Using Audio
Lingual Method at the Eighth Grade Students of MTs Al-
Mukhtariyah Nagasaribu Padang Lawas Utara

2. Teaching Speaking without Using Audio Lingual Method
From the score calculation, it is found that the highest score is 70
and the lowest score is 25. The averages score is 51.67, median is 57.56
and mode is 48.17. Then, the score of mean, median and mode can be seen
in the following table :
Table 4
The Score of Mean, Median and Mode of Teaching Speaking
Without Using Audio Lingual Method

No Name Score
1 Mean 51.67
2 Median 57.56
3 Mode 48.17

The average score of speaking by without using audio lingual
method is 51.67 and predicated Fail. It means that many of the students
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
1
0


f
33.5 45.5 56.5 67.5 78.5 89.5 99.5
X
31

are able to answer the tests. To see the position of mean score, it can be
drawn in the following figure :



Figure 3: The Position of the Mean Score of Teaching Speaking
without Using Audio Lingual Method at the Eighth Grade
Students of MTs Al- Mukhtariyah Nagasaribu Padang Lawas
Utara

After finding the mean, median and mode the writer analyze the
students achievement based on the indicators as follows:
d. The students ability at the eighth grade of MTs Al- Mukhtariyah
Nagasaribu Padang Lawas Utara identify the vocabulary is categorized
good. It is shown from the score of the students achievement
265/450 x 100 = 58.89
e. The students ability at eighth grade of MTs Al- Mukhtariyah
Nagasaribu Padang Lawas Utara identify the pronuncation is
categorized enough. It is shown from the score of the students
achievement 235/450 x 100 = 52.22
f. The students ability at the eighth grade of MTs Al- Mukhtariyah
Nagasaribu Padang Lawas Utara identify the fluency is categorize
fail. Its shown from the score of students achievement, 275/600 x
100 = 45.83
Furthermore, the frequency distribution of teaching speaking
without using audio lingual method can be described below:
50

53, 20
0
50
100
51, 67
32

Table 5
The Frequency Distribution of Teaching Speaking without Using
Audio Lingual Method at at the Eighth Grade Students
of MTs Al- Mukhtariyah Nagasaribu
Padang Lawas Utara

No Interval Frequency
Cumulative
Frequency
Percentage
(%)
Mid Point
1 25 35 2 2 13.33 24.5 35.5
2 36 46 3 5 20 35.5 46.5
3 47 57 5 10 33.33 46.5 57.5
4 58 68 3 13 20 57.5 68.5
5 69 79 2 15 13.33 68.5 78.5
Total 15 100 %

Based on the table above, it can be seen that there are five interval
classes with its interval is eleven. The first is 25 35 and there are two student
or 13.33 % from the total of frequency, second is 36 46 and there are 3
students or 20 % from the total of frequency, third is 47 57 and there are 5
students or 33.33 % from the total of the frequency, fourth is 58 68 and there
are 3 students or 20 %, the fifth is 69 79 and there are 2 students or 13.33 %
from the total of frequency.
The description of the normality of the data described in the following
histogram:






33










Figure 4 : Histogram Frequency of Teaching Speaking without Using
Audio Lingual Method at the Eighth Grade Students of MTs
Al-Mukhtariyah Nagasaribu Padang Lawas Utara

B. Hypothesis Testing
Based on the explanation before, it can be found that the result of
teaching speaking by using audio lingual method is better than without using
audio lingual method or there is a significant differential result between using
audio lingual method and conventional method.
After collecting the data, this research is going to test the hypothesis.
However, the testing hypothesis can be found after finding the score of each
variable in mean, median and mode. The data which is taken in accordance to
the participants score on the instrument test responses are tabulated as the
purpose of testing the hypothesis that is mentioned previously.
In order to get calculation score (t
0
), the writer used the formula of t
test with statistical analysis as follows:
5
4
3
2
1
0


f
24.5 35.5 46.5 57.5 68.5 78.5
X
34

1. The calculation of the data teaching speaking by using audio lingual
method to the eighth grade student of MTs Al-Mukhtariyah Nagasaribu
Padang Lawas Utara.
a. Mean of variable 1 (M
1
)
1
M =
N
X

=
25
1750

= 70
b. Median
Me = b + p
f k
F N
(
(
(
(

2
1

= 67.5 + 6
8
10 25 .
2
1
(
(
(
(

= 67.5 + 6
8
10 5 . 12
(

= 67.5 + 6
8
5 . 2
(

= 67.5 + 1.87
= 69.37
c. Mode
Mo = b + p
d d
d
|
|
.
|

\
|
+
2 1
1

= 67.5 +
6
4 2
2
|
.
|

\
|
+

= 67.5 +
6
6
2
|
.
|

\
|

= 67.5 + 2
= 69.50
35

d. Standard deviation of variable M
1

SDx =
N
X

=
25
1750
= 36 . 8 70 =



e. Standard error of variable M
1

SE
MX
= 71 . 1
89 . 4
36 . 8
24
36 . 8
1 25
36 . 8
1
= = =

=
N
SD
X


2. The calculation of the data teaching speaking without using audio lingual
method to the eighth grade student of MTs Al-Mukhtariyah Nagasaribu
Padang Lawas Utara.
a. Mean of variable 2 (M
2
)

2
M =
N
X

=
15
775

= 51.67

b. Median
Me = b + p
f k
F N
(
(
(
(

2
1

= 46.5 + 5
5
7 15 .
2
1
(
(
(
(

= 46.5 + 6
5
7 5 . 7
(

= 46.5 + 6
5
5 . 0
(

= 57.5 + 0.6
= 57.56
36

c. Mode
Mo = b + p
d d
d
|
|
.
|

\
|
+
2 1
1

= 46.5 + 5
4 2
2
|
.
|

\
|
+

= 46.5 + 5
6
2
|
.
|

\
|

= 46.5 + 1.67
= 48.17
d. Standard deviation of variable M
1

SDx =
N
X

=
15
775
= 18 . 7 67 . 51 =


e. Standard error of variable M
1

SE
MX
= 91 . 1
74 . 3
18 . 7
14
18 . 7
1 15
18 . 7
1 15
= = =

X
SD


3. The calculation between the mean of variable X and Y, and calculation to
get the score of t
0
at the eighth grade student of MTs Al-Mukhtariyah
Nagasaribu Padang Lawas Utara.
a. Standard error differences variable X and mean variable Y

by formula
as follow:
SE
M1-M2
= ( ) ( )
2
2
2
1 M M
SE SE +

= ( ) ( )
2 2
91 . 1 71 . 1 +


= 64 . 3 92 . 2 +

= 56 . 6


= 2.56

37

b. The value of t
0
applying the formula as follows:
t
0
=
2 1
2 1
M M
SE
M M

=
56 . 2
67 . 51 70


=
56 . 2
33 . 18


= 7.16


Based on the calculation above, the value of the t
test
is 7.16. While the
samples are 40 students where N
1
= 25 students and N
2
= 15 students. So df
(N
1
+ N
2
) 2 = (25 + 15) 2 = 40 2 = 38. Because there is no df 38 in the
table, the writer takes the formula as follows. In this case, the writer takes on
95% significant level.
N t
table

(y
1
,x
1
) 30 1.70
(y
2
,x
2
) 40 1.68

1 2
1
1 2
1
x x
x x
y y
y y

70 . 1 68 . 1
70 . 1
30 40
30 36

x

02 . 0
70 . 1
10
6

=
x

10 (x 1.70) = -0.12
10x 17 = -0.12
10x = 17 0.12
10x = 16.88
38

x = 1.68
t
table
= 1.68
Finally, the writer finds that the t
table
is 1.68 and t
test
is 7.16. The value
of t
test
is greater than the value of t
table
(7.16 > 1.68). It means that there is a
significant effectiveness of audio lingual method on the result of teaching
speaking at eighth grade student of MTs Al-Mukhtariyah Nagasaribu Padang
Lawas Utara.

C. Discussion
From the hypothesis testing, the mean of students who were taught by
using audio lingual method is 70. While the mean of students who were taught
without using audio lingual method is 51.67. Then, the value of t
test
is greater
than t
table
(7.16 > 1.68), so that the alternative hypothesis (Ha) is accepted, it
means that There is a significant effective of audio lingual method on the
result of teaching speaking eighth grade student of MTs Al-Mukhtariyah
Nagasaribu Padang Lawas Utara.
Thus, it is relevant with the research that has been done by Anggraeni
(2007: 43) about audio lingual teaching as an alternative method in teaching
speaking. The result the Audio-lingual teaching method has a significant
effect on the first year students speaking skill of Junior High School at SMP
Negeri II Pemalangdue to the significant difference (p=0.05) between the pre-
test and post-test scores of the students speaking skills in which the post-
tests mean is significantly higher than those the pre-test.
39

From the above results, the teacher should use audio lingual method in
language teaching process to make students more interested and active
especially for speaking ability.