Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Impacts
Impacts
Impacts
No escalatio( , No dra#2i(: US a(d 5*ssia #ill ma(a%e co(1lict. )r. S"<hash "apila8 +o s"lta t8 Strategi& A..airs with So"th Asia A al7sis 0ro"p8 =" e 28 200-8 BMI))6E
EAS14 1HE S13A1E0I+ (CWE3/(6A@ ;E1WEEN UNI1E) S1A1ES AN) 3ESU30EN1 3USSIA8D http4//www.so"thasiaa al7sis.org/E2+papers-'E2+paper-!-2.ht%l Strate%ic po#er2pla9 does (ot (ecessaril9 impl9 militar9 co(1ro(tatio( a d ar%ed &o .li&t. (ower/pla7 i%plies the "se o. politi&al8 e&o o%i& a d strategi& leverages to get the appropriate res"lts .or o es atio al se&"rit7 i terests i a regio . E&e( at t!e !ei%!t o1 t!e /old War a(d t!e #ars i( t!e Middle East: t!e U(ited States a(d 5*ssia *sed <ac+ c!a((el diplomac9 a(d co(s*ltatio(s 1or co(1lict2escalatio( pre&e(tio( . C e &o"ld sa7 that t!ere #as so%e sort o. Bs!ared strate%ic ma(a%eme(t> o1 t!e Middle East. 1here.ore8 e&e( toda9 o(e ca( reaso(a<l9 assert t!at despite t!e po#er2pla9 i( actio( <et#ee( t!e U(ited States a(d 5*ssia i( t!e Middle East: some si%(i1ica(t strate%ic co(&er%e(ces e0ist <et#ee( t!ese t#o %lo<al pla9ers.
Impacts
d A.gha ista 8 a d the possi<le e,te sio o. the A.gha &o .li&t to the tri<al areas o. (a#ista 8 <"t rather a %aAor war i the 6eva t. 1he .ear i the regio is o. a other war <rea#i g o"t <etwee Israel a d its eigh<o"rs8 a war whi&h wo"ld e g"l. 6e<a o 8 S7ria a d the o&&"pied (alesti ia territories // a d eve ris# a i terve tio <7 Ira . I view o. A%eri&aHs &lose allia &e with Israel8 A%eri&a i terests wo"ld i evita<l7 <e a..e&ted. I a ew war i g this wee#8 the US State )epart%e t "rged A%eri&a s to de.er traveli g to 6e<a o a d advised those i the &o" tr7 to I&o sider &are."ll7 the ris# o. re%ai i g.I So !o# immi(e(t is t!e t!reat o1 #ar? /o*ld t!e Ara<s start a #ar? T!at m*st <e =*d%ed !i%!l9 *(li+el9. Hi@<*lla! i 6e<a o a(d Hamas i 0a9a !a&e t!e a<ilit9 to pro&o+e Israel #it! pi(pric+s8 <*t whatever the7 %ight %a age to do // sa78 i the wa7 o. Jassa% ro&#ets or hit/a d/r" &ross/<order atta&#s // t!e i(itiati&e to escalate t!e co(1lict i to a %aAor war #o*ld al#a9s lie #it! Israel. S9ria is t!e o(l9 o(e o1 IsraelAs (ei%!<o*rs #it! a(9 serio*s militar9 capa<ilit9. Mi%!t S9ria t!e( start a #ar? T!is8 too8 is !i%!l9 impla*si<le8 <eca*se o1 t!e r"%o"red di&isio(s #it!i( its top arm9 cadres: <*t also <eca*se Israel is so m*c! stro(%er . Israel has highl7/ developed %ilitar7 i d"stries o. its ow a d re&eives %assive aid a d adva &ed weapo r7 .ro% the U ited States. I deed8 S9riaAs c*rre(t sta(ce #o*ld seem to <e merel9 de1e(si&e. It .ailed8 or was " a<le8 to respo d whe the Israeli air .or&e8 i a s"rprise a d " provo#ed atta&# // o do"<t i te ded to i ti%idate )a%as&"s // destro7ed a %ilitar7 i stallatio i easter S7ria last Septe%<er. :ar .ro% wa ti g war: S9ria !as o the &o trar7 so*%!t to de1*se te(sio(s <7 &alli g repeatedl7 .or pea&e tal#s with Israel // %ost re&e tl7 i the %essage it &o ve7ed last wee# thro"gh .or%er US (reside t =i%%7 +arter. S7riaHs (reside t ;ashar al/Asad told +arter that he <elieved that a<o"t '2 per&e t o. the iss"es <etwee S7ria a d Israel had <ee resolved i egotiatio s i the 155*s8 a d that he was eager to &o &l"de a deal as soo as possi<le. T!e a(s#er8 there.ore8 to t!e B*estio( o1 #!et!er #ar #ill <rea+ o*t t!is s*mmer m*st lie #it!
Israel. I
parti&"lar8 it will depe d o whether Israel &o ti "es to &hoose to resolve so%e o. its strategi& dile%%as <7 .or&e. 1hree o. these dile%%as see% parti&"larl7 pressi g. 1he7 relate to4 K the " pre&ede ted rise o. the Isla%i& 3ep"<li& o. Ira as a %aAor regio al powerL K the &halle ge posed <7 Hi9<allah a d Ha%as8 two %ilita t o /state a&tors o IsraelHs <ordersL a d8 K the possi<le &ha ges whi&h a ew A%eri&a preside t %ight %a#e e,t 7ear to A%eri&aHs Middle East poli&7. Ira has e%erged as a regio al rival8 ot o l7 o. Israel <"t also o. the U ited States. Its i .l"e &e is h"ge i Ira>8 i &reasi g i S7ria a d 6e<a o 8 a d is ow rea&hi g i to the (alesti ia 1erritories a d the 0"l. States. It poses a threat to the regio al hege%o 7 the U ited States has e Ao7ed si &e the &ollapse o. the Soviet U io . :oolishl78 the U ited States did ot .oresee that <7 atta&#i g a d destro7i g Ira> // with IsraelHs eager e &o"rage%e t // it wo"ld &reate the &o ditio s .or Ira Hs e%erge &e. 1he U ited States a d Israel %"st ow live with the &o se>"e &es o. their strategi& <l" der. +o trar7 to Israeli .ears a d propaga da8 Ira Hs "&lear progra%%e poses o # ow Ie,iste tial threatI to the =ewish state. ;"t it &o"ld # o&# Israel o.. its per&h as the Middle EastHs %ost power."l "&lear a d %ilitar7 state8 there<7 li%iti g its .reedo% o. a&tio agai st s"&h lo&al adversaries as S7ria8 Hi9<"llah a d Ha%as. Will Israel // with or witho"t US help // attac+ Ira(As (*clear 1acilities F I spite o. the
<elli&ose rhetori& o. so%e Israeli leaders8 t!is seems !i%!l9 *(li+el9. T!e predicta<le co(seB*e(ces .or the regio o. s"&h a a&t8 1or Israel itsel. a d .or A%eri&a i terests8 are too !orre(do*s to &o te%plate. 1he U ited States a d Israel will pro<a<l7 have to %a#e do with &o tai %e t a d deterre &e8 while &o ti "i g their e..orts to " der%i e Ira Hs e&o o%7 a d to %o<ili9e Ara< states agai st it // as US Se&retar7 o. State +o dolee99a 3i&e was atte%pti g to do i K"wait this wee#. Israel #o*ld: o. &o"rse8 li+e to destro9 <ot! Hi@<*lla! a(d Hamas. C*t t!is is (o eas9 tas+8 si &e the two %ove%e ts are deepl7 i%pla ted i the lo&al pop"latio s a d wage a .or% o. as7%%etri& g"errilla war.are8 #it! whi&h a co(&e(tio(al a(d i(creasi(%l9 dise(c!a(ted arm9 li+e IsraelAs is ill2 eB*ipped to deal. Israel tried // a d .ailed // to s%ash Hi9<"llah i its &ostl7 6e<a o war o. -**6. C l7 a ver7 rash Israeli leader wo"ld tr7 agai i
the prese t &ir&"%sta &es. Israel will o do"<t have to live with a power."l Hi9<"llah8 <a&#ed <7 Ira a d S7ria8 di&tati g the politi&al order i 6e<a o . Mea while8 Israel &o ti "es to atte%pt to <ri g dow the Ha%as gover %e t <7 <esiegi g8 starvi g8 a d <o%<ardi g the 1.2 %illio i ha<ita ts o. 0a9a. ;"t this <r"tal poli&7 shows o sig o. s"&&ess. :or Ha%as to a&&ept the siege wo"ld eve t"all7 %ea a slow death. It is8 there.ore8 &halle gi g the <lo&#ade <7 atta&#i g Israeli &rossi g poi ts whe it &a 8 %"&h as it did last =a "ar7 whe it <ro"ght dow the .e &e o the Eg7ptia <order8 leadi g to a %ass <rea#/o"t o. so%e !**8*** h" gr7 (alesti ia s. A ."rther %aAor worr7 o the Israeli hori9o is that the e,t A%eri&a preside t %ight ot <e as aggressivel7 pro/Israeli as 0eorge W. ;"sh. 1he possi<ilit7 o. a A%eri&a withdrawal .ro% Ira> a d o. a US Igra d <argai I with Ira %"st also <e a so"r&e o. great a ,iet7. It is ot s"rprisi g that US/Israeli lo<<7ists8 i &l"di g the <ig g" s o. the Washi gto I stit"te8 stro gl7 s"pport =oh M&+ai 8 s%ear ;ara&# C<a%a a d have %o" ted a ve o%o"s &a%paig agai st =i%%7 +arter. Has Israel got a alter ativeF @es8 the alter ative is a &o%prehe sive pea&e. ;"t Israel is " willi g // i deed " a<le // to pa7 the pri&e o. s"&h a pea&e8 whi&h wo"ld re>"ire a withdrawal to the 156! <orders. No Israeli leader has the politi&al visio or the %oral a"thorit7 to &o te%plate s"&h a %ove. 1oo %a 7 .a&ts have <ee &reated o the gro" d o (alesti ia territor7. 1he %essia i& Israeli drea% o. &o trolli g the whole o. histori& (alesti e re%ai s ver7 %"&h alive. Nor &a Israel &o sider a&&epti g the ter%s proposed <7 Ha%as8 whi&h are a e,&ha ge o. priso ers8 a li.ti g o. the 0a9a siege a d a %"t"al te /7ear tr"&e. 1o a&&ept s"&h ter%s wo"ld %ea a&&epti g a .or% o. %"t"al deterre &e8 so%ethi g Israel has traditio all7 reAe&ted. 1he tr"th wo"ld see% to <e that Israel ca( (eit!er #a%e a
1*ll2scale #ar agai st its oppo e ts (or ma+e peace with the%. It is t!ere1ore co(dem(ed to co(ti(*e to rel9 o( its prese(t policies o. <esiegi g 0a9a8 i ti%idati g its oppo e ts <7 lo g/dista &e air a d &o%%a do stri#es8 a d de&apitati g hostile resista
&e %ove%e ts <7 assassi atio . S"&h s#ir%ishes see% <o" d to &o ti "e8 #eepi g the regio i a high state o. te sio a d ta#i g a heav7 toll o &ivilia s8 espe&iall7 (alesti ia s. ;arri g a %is&al&"latio <7 o e side or a other8 this low-level warfare would8 however8 have the merit of sparing the region a major conflagration. T!e s*mmer ma9 (ot8 a.ter all8 <e as <lood9 as some 1ear.
Impacts
Impacts
a(d capa<le U.S.2So*t! "orea( armed 1orces. Wit! t!e Nort! %ro#i(% co(ti(*all9 #ea+er relati&e to t!e So*t!: t!e c!a(ces 1or #ar <ecome e&e( slimmer. Nort! "orea (e&er !ad t!e material capa<ilities to <e a serio*s co(te(der to t!e U.S.2So*t! "orea( allia(ce: a(d it 1ell 1*rt!er <e!i(d earl9 . So the real >"estio has ot <ee
whether North Korea wo"ld e gage i a preve tive atta&# as So"th Korea &a"ght "p8 <"t wh7 North Korea %ight .ight as it .ell ."rther a d ."rther <ehi d.
Nort! "orea does (ot #a(t #ar , ass*mes t!eir e&ide(ce 6o+ota 10 M1a#ashi8 BNo War With North KoreaD8 Newswee#. New @or#4 =" !8 -*1*. Uol. 1228 Iss. -38
pro>"estN T!e t#o "oreas !a&e seemed !eaded 1or a serio*s collisio( e&er si(ce i(ter(atio(al i(&esti%ators co(1irmed t!at it #as a Nort! 2"orea( torpedo t!at sa(+ t!e So*t!Ds #ars!ip /!eo(a( o( Marc! 2$. 6ast wee# (7o g7a gVs
Natio al )e.e se +o%%issio threate ed Iall/o"t warI i. Seo"l is s"&&ess."l i its p"sh .or ew i ter atio al sa &tio s agai st the regi%e. A d as So"th Korea (reside t 6ee M7" g/<a# &"t o.. trade with the North a d threate ed to res"%e <road&asti g propaga da a&ross the de%ilitari9ed 9o e8 .o"r North Korea s"<%ari es a<r"ptl7 le.t port8 p"tti g the So"th Korea Nav7 o high alert. Still8 this .ra&as %a7 ot <e all it see%s. I .a&t8 Nort! "orea( leader "im ;o(%2Il seems to <e see+i(% a 1ace2sa&i(% #a9 o*t. E&e( as t!e Nort!Ds
1ire2<reat!i(% %e(erals &o#ed to res*me t!e 1i%!t t!at <e%a( i( 1740: a stateme(t 1rom t!e re%imeDs political leaders!ip esc!e#ed tal+ o1 #ar: merel9 1ree@i(% relatio(s a(d scrappi(% a (o(a%%ressio( a%reeme(t . Wester( i(telli%e(ce reported (o si%(s t!at .9o(%9a(% #as mo<ili@i(% 1or a( act*al armed s!o#do#(. A(d t!e Nort!Ds Eorei%( Mi(istr9 iss*ed its o#( stateme(t: mostl9 de(o*(ci(% t!e U(ited States: <*t e(di(% #it! a re(e#ed pled%e to de(*cleari@e t!e "orea( .e(i(s*la. 1ra slatio 4 t!e re%imeDs so1ter side #a(ts o*t o1 t!is mess. Seo"l8 whi&h wa ts to ease /te sio s <e.ore hosti g the 0-* s"%%it this .all8 %ade s"re to o..er the North a wa7 o"t4 8ee dema(ded t!at .9o(%9a(% Fapolo%i@e a(d p*(is! t!ose respo(si<le 1or t!e attac+:F la9i(% do#( relati&el9 eas9 terms 1or t!e Nort! to resol&e t!e co(1lict. .9o(%9a(% ma9 <e prepari(% to compl9. Eve <e.ore the i vestigatio &o &l"ded8
the Natio al )e.e se +o%%issio dis%issed Ki% Il/+hol8 its highest/ra #i g aval o..i&er8 &iti g his Iold age.I 1he aval &hie. is said to <e i his late !*s8 <"t so are %a 7 other &o%%issio %e%<ers. C<servers spe&"late that (7o g7a g %a7 "se the dis%issal to &lai% it has alread7 p" ished the %a respo si<le8 perhaps setti g the stage .or a apolog7. Ke eth J"i o es8 a .or%er State )epart%e t egotiator a d Korea e,pert8 sa7s a Isi%ilar d7 a%i&I g"ided North KoreaVs respo se whe o e o. its s"<%ari es i .iltrated So"th Korea territorial waters i 1556. Ulti%atel78 %oderate ele%e ts i (7o g7a g pers"aded the %ilitar7 hardli ers to %a#e a o..i&ial apolog7. So .ar8 histor7 loo#s set to repeat itsel..
Impacts
o(l9 limited impact o( 1*(dame(tal America( sec*rit9 i(terests. Was!i(%to( (e&ert!eless is st*c+ i( t!e ce(ter o1 "orea( a11airs toda9 <eca*se o1 t!e U.S.25G" allia(ce: #!ic! pro&ides a sec*rit9 %*ara(tee to So*t! "orea #it! (o correspo(di(% <e(e1it to t!e U(ited States. A<se t this relatio ship8 there wo"ld <e o U.S. troops o
the Korea pe i s"la withi ra ge o. North Korea atta a d o A%eri&a pro%ise to i terve e i a 7 war that %ight res"lt .ro% a provo&atio <7 (7o g7a g or retaliatio <7 the So"th.
Nort! "orea is ratio(al Nima( 03 MMi&hael8 (h.). i A%eri&a . St"dies QI ter&"lt"ral St"diesS8 BWh7 we wo Ht go to war with North
KoreaD8 http4//www.&oldt7pe. et/Assets/pd.s/1.Ni%.=a 16.pd.N ;"t what a<o"t these North Korea sF W!9 are t!e9 s*dde(l9 rattli(% (*clear sa<ers? /o(&e(tio(al #isdom sa9s t!e9Are (*ts: <*t t!eir actio(s are act*all9 B*ite predicta<le. ItHs <ee o e 7ear si &e 0eorge W de&lared North Korea Bevil.D D*ri(% t!at 9ear: t!e C*s! admi(istratio( a((o*(ced t!at Nort! "orea #o*ld <e eli%i<le to recei&e a Hpre2empti&e> (*clear 1irst2stri+e 1rom t!e U.S. /o*ple t!is #it! t!e C*s! admi(istratio(As I$0 <illio( Hmissile2de1e(se> pro%ram: #!ic! t!e9 ar%*e #o*ld <e *sed i( a #ar a%ai(st Nort! "orea: a(d #e <e%i( to see #!9 t!e Nort! "orea(s are (er&o*s. ;"sh also p"t the #a<osh o So"th Korea Os re" i.i&atio pla s with the orth8 th"s g"ara teei g the &o ti "ed e,iste &e o. North Korea a d the &o ti "atio o. hostilities <etwee that atio a d o"rs. I( li%!t o1 all o1 t!is: Nort! "oreaJs #eapo(s pro%ram seems li+e a predicta<le a(d e&e( ratio(al respo(se. T!e9 still claim t!at t!e9 are #illi(% to stop t!e pro%ram: <*t o(l9 i( e0c!a(%e 1or a U.S. promise (ot to la*(c! a 1irst stri+e attac+ a%ai(st t!eir co*(tr9. T!e C*s! re%ime #o(At ma+e t!at commitme(t: reser&i(% its ri%!t to attac+ a(9 (atio( at a(9 time: #it! or #it!o*t pro&ocatio(. I the &ase o. North Korea8 however8 itHs %ore a<o"t #eepi g a paper war alive8 eve at the ris# o. a real "&lear war.
Impacts
Natio(al Sec*rit9 Ad&isor =i% ;o(es declared i a spee&h to the Atla ti& +o" &il t!at t!e rece(t testi(% o1 a (*clear de&ice a(d 1iri(% o1 Taepodo(% missiles <9 Nort! "orea Fare (ot a( immi(e(t t!reatF to t!e U(ited States or t!e re%io(s <eca*se Ft!e9 !a&e a lo(% #a9 to %oF i( per1ecti(% t!e tec!(olo%9 to #eapo(i@e t!eir (*+es. He
added8 however that I1he i%%i e t threat is the proli.eratio o. that t7pe o. te&h olog7 to other &o" tries a d pote tiall7 terrorist orga i9atio s a d o / state a&tors.I Nat"rall78 this <old state%e t8 espe&iall7 &o%i g a.ter several da7s o. ha d/wri gi g i the %edia8 was ot goi g to go " &halle ged. ;logger 3i&# Mora 8 writi g at A%eri&a 1hi #er8 de&lares this IMore Ke7sto e Kops .oreig poli&7 .ro% C<a%a.I While oti g that the ad%i istratio has raised o"r %ilitar7 alert level8 whi&h I%a#es it &lear that the North Korea threat is <ei g ta#e ver7 serio"sl7 <7 the White Ho"se8I Mora wo ders8 Iwh7 go o"t o. 7o"r wa7 to dow pla7 the threat <7 trotti g o"t 7o"r atio al se&"rit7 advisor to state the o<vio"sFI Si%ilarl78 Hot AirVs Ed Morrisse7 wo ders8 IHas
# ig ori g Ki% will %a#e hi% go awa7F I have to ad%it that o o e has tried that strateg7 with North Korea8 perhaps <e&a"se o o e has <ee &ra97 e o"gh to thi # it will wor#.I I teresti g8 Har&ard I5 sc!olar Stephe Walt s*%%ests doi(% =*st t!at: North KoreaVs "&lear a d %issile tests are hardl7 good ews8 <"t the7 do Ht A"sti.7 goi g i to ."ll pa i& %ode. We alread7 # ew that North Korea had a "&lear weapo s &apa<ilit78 a d tho"gh this latest test see%s to have <ee slightl7 %ore power."l tha the i itial o e8 it does Ht i%pl7 a >"alitative shi.t i the strategi& e viro %e t. Nort!
"oreaDs de1ia(ce is a((o9i(%: per!aps: <*t itAs (ot li+e t!e act o1 testi(% a (*clear #eapo( tells *s somet!i(% (e# a<o*t t!eir re%ime. A(d letDs (ot 1or%et t!at t!e U(ited States !as tested a (*clear #eapo(s 1030 times Qpl"s a other -4 Aoi t tests with 0reat ;ritai S8 #!ile .9o(%9a(% !as tested e0actl9 t#ice. A.ter oti g that <oth ;ill +li to a d
0eorge W. ;"sh .ailed to stop the )(3KVs "&lear progra% <e&a"se Io"r ha ds are largel7 tied8I Walt &o &l"des8 So the <est respo se is to re%ai &al%8 a d stop tal#i g as i. this eve t is a test o. C<a%aVs resolve or a ." da%e tal &halle ge to U.S. poli&7. I .a&t8 the tests are A"st I<"si ess as "s"alI .or North Korea8 a d it wo"ld <etter i. the U ited States I" der/rea&tsI rather tha overrea&ts. I stead o. givi g (7o g7a g the atte tio it wa ts8 the U ited States sho"ld "se this i &ide t as a opport" it7 to <"ild &o se s"s a%o g the %ai i terested parties Q+hi a8 3"ssia8 So"th Korea8 =apa S a d let +hi a ta#e the lead i addressi g it. A<ove all8 the C<a%a ad%i istratio sho"ld avoid %a#i g a lot o. sweepi g state%e ts a<o"t how it will ot ItolerateI a North Korea "&lear &apa<ilit7. 1he .a&t is that weVve tolerated it .or so%e ti%e ow8 a d si &e we do Vt have good optio s .or deali g with it8 thatVs pre&isel7 what we will &o ti "e to do.
Deterre(ce does(At depe(d i( Nort! "oreaAs ratio(alit9 (A13I+K M. MG53AN8 +o .li&t Ma age%e t a d (ea&e S&ie &e vol. -3 o. - 1-1/13'8 April 200$8
B)eterre &e a d S7ste% Ma age%e t41he +ase o. North Korea8D A&&esses http4//&%p.sagep"<.&o%/&o te t/-3/-/1-1.."ll.pd.Wht%l8 goet9 T!ere are co(cer(s t!at t!e Nort! ma9 attac+ <eca*se its leaders co*ld <e irratio(al, not taking deterrence
seriously and miscalculating the consequences of an attack. Cited is the way the North often seems cavalier about a war, threatening one over all sorts of provocations, such as N sanctions. !oes this call .".#$O% deterrence into question& 'irst, it is possible the regime could be irrational. (t has a history of serious miscalculations and irrationality cannot be ruled out. )owever, co(trar9 to t!e sta(dard &ie#: t!e tar%etAs ratio(alit9 is (ot a prereB*isite 1or s*ccess1*l deterre(ce. !eterrence theory was initially constructed by assuming actor rationality, but deterrence in practice does not require rationality in either party. All t!at is reB*ired is s*11icie(t 1ear o1 t!e
co(seB*e(ces 1rom t!e t!reate(ed retaliatio( to lead t!e tar%et to 1or%o #!at t!e t!reat see+s to pre&e(t. T!at 1ear ca( !a&e ratio(al or irratio(al rootsK the per&eptio s and judgments behind it may be rational, irrational, or
some combination of the two. *he same is true for judgments that deterrence threats can be ignored. +laborate cost-benefit calculations are not needed to be afraid of being hurt and to seek to avoid it. Officials can be irrationally ,e-cessively or for the wrong reasons. frightened or nonrationally frightened ,fro/en by stress, uncertainty, surprise, an-iety, or premonitions of disaster.. 0gainst such decision makers deterrence and compellence threats may work well. 1oreover, some &aria(ts o1 irratio(alit9 ca( ma+e a leader or %o&er(me(t
easier: (ot !arder: to deter. (n fact, since it is usually impossible to determine how rational leaders and governments
are, even in retrospect, there is no uncontested evidence that rationality is crucial in deterrence success. *he most sophisticated e-planation of how mutual nuclear deterrence works relies on the parties being aware that they may not be consistently rational, so threats it would be foolish to carry out nevertheless work because governments are not guaranteed to act rationally2deterrers can benefit from being irrational or the possibility they might be, or be crippled by this in trying to deliver highly credible threats. (n short, there is no fi-ed relationship between rationality and deterrence success or failure ,1organ, 3445, pp. 63#78.. T!e cr*cial &aria<le i( deterre(ce sit*atio(s is t!e #ill o1 t!e tar%et
%o&er(me(t to attac+ a(d o1 t!e deterrer to respo(d militaril9. !eterrence is meant to shrink the target9s will to
attack, and though deterrence threats can have some effect, that will is shaped by other factors as well. 0s a result, deterrence may succeed, or fail, when it :shouldn9t;< that is, the other elements, rational and irrational, shaping the challenger9s decision may be compatible with or reinforce deterrence threats, or may serve to override them ,1organ 3445, pp. =>6#=>?.. (n a serious crisis, how strong will the North9s determination to attack be&8 (n fact, it is unlikely to be high. I1 it !as (*clear #eapo(s t!is #ill <e partic*larl9 tr*eK t!e9 #ill lead it to <e more ca*tio*s: less
pro&ocati&e. Its militar9 i(1eriorit9 #o*ld <e a( importa(t 1actor: as #o*ld t!e #ea+(ess o1 its eco(om9 a(d '
Impacts
its depe(de(ce o( o*tsiders. So #o*ld its lac+ o1 tr*e allies that share its worldview or have a huge stake in the regime9s survival after it started a war. 1ost importantly, a( attac+ o the 3CK8 =apa 8 or U.S. .or&es #o*ld p*t t!e re%imeAs s*r&i&al at ris+: a(d t!is is a re%ime lo(% dedicated: a<o&e all: to s*r&i&al. 0ttacking with weapons of
mass destruction ,@1!.would replay Aapan9s mistake of =86=B seeking to get the that make it implaccable. " to settle for peace by using means
Impacts
N*clear deterre(ce #ill pre&e(t a( I(do2.a+ #ar Stephe 3lo&er8 &ol"% ist .or the dail7 %ail8 April --8 20108 )ail7 Mail8
http4//www.dail7%ail.&o."#/de<ate/&ol"% ists/arti&le/1-6!5-6/Kill/1ride t/rate/ atio /de.e d/itsel..ht%l T!e /old War #as #o( <9 t!e West as a res*lt o1 (*clear deterre(ce . Witho"t it8 the %"&h %ore power."l red Ar%7 wo"ld pro<a<l7 have i vaded Wester E"rope de&ades ago a d we %ight all <e drivi g aro" d i 6adas a d getti g dr" # o &heap vod#a. No properl9 1*(ctio(i(% (*clear State !as e&er <ee( i(&aded. I(dia a(d .a+ista( are (o# *(li+el9 to %o to #ar a%ai(st eac! ot!er 1or t!e simple reaso( t!at <ot! possess (*clear #eapo(s. Deterre(ce !as #or+ed <et#ee( states8 tho"gh all <ets are o.. i. a gro"p o. dera ged terrorists sho"ld get hold o. a Vdirt7 <o%<V. 1he Soviet U io %a7 o lo ger pose %"&h o. a
threat8 <"t there %a7 <e other "&lear states that will threate "s i 3* 7earsV ti%e. +hi aF Ira F North KoreaF No o e # ows. We &a o l7 # ow that "&lear weapo s provide the "lti%ate i s"ra &e.
1*
Impacts
War is *(li+el9 <et#ee( .a+ista( a(d I(diaLt!e9 pre1er peace a(d are e(%a%ed i( diplomac9: i(cl*di(% a resol*tio( o1 t!e #ater co(1lict T!e Statesma( *-/1-/2010 QB(a# shows readi ess .or tal#s o -2 :e<D8 6e,isNe,is8 a&&essed !/-*/1*S
.a+ista( !as i(dicated its readi(ess 1or the .oreig se&retar7/level tal+s o -2 :e<r"ar78 sa7i g the two sides eeded to %ove .orward <*t i(sisted o( res*mptio( o1 composite dialo%*e co&eri(% "as!mir a(d ot!er o*tsta(di(% iss*es that is
%ea i g."l a d res"lt/orie ted. 3espo di g to the two sets o. dates proposed <7 I dia .or the tal#s8 (a#ista .oreig %i ister Shah Mah%ood J"reshi said that -2 :e<r"ar7 was ot a <ad date .or the tal#s.Mr J"reshiVs words .ollow (ri%e Mi ister Mr @o"s". 3a9a 0ila iVs state%e t that
.a+ista( !ad al#a9s 1a&ored dialo%*e #it! I(dia to a #ar #!o appreciated I(diaDs Fi(te(tio(F to res*me tal+s. 3eiterati g (a#ista Vs sta &e o res"%ptio o. dialog"e8 Mr 0ila i said Ipoliti&ia s %a#e <ridges ot wallsI8 A(( ews age &7 reported.
II appre&iate I diaVs i te tio to res"%e tal#s8I he said. I1here is a i te tio that we sa7 that there will <e o war. ;"t i te tio s &a &ha ge a 7ti%e. 1here is a threat per&eptio 8 thatVs wh7 we wa t dialog"e8I Mr 0ila i said i i terview with a private televisio &ha el tele&ast last ight.:oreig se&retar7 Mrs Nir"pa%a 3ao had proposed 1' a d -2 :e<r"ar7 as dates .or tal#s with her (a#ista i &o" terpart Mr Sal%a ;ashir. 1he &o%posite dialog"e <etwee the two sides was s"spe ded i the wa#e o. the -6/11 M"%<ai terror atta&#s. I <elieve we sho"ld %ove .orward. +o%%o se se states that tal#s sho"ld <e held as soo as possi<le8 Mr J"reshi said.W!at is importa(t is t!at #e start tal+i(%. C. &o"rse we .eel that these tal#s sho"ld <e the re/start o. the &o%posite dialog"e a d ta#e it "p .ro% where we le.t o... A.ter all8 all the iss"es that <oth sides wa t to raise are i &l"ded i the &o%posite dialog"e8 he said i separate i terviews to 0eo ews &ha el a d the News dail7. We have %a 7 o"tsta di g iss"es o o"r age da8 li#e the Kash%ir iss"e that I dia re&og ises. 1here is the waters iss"e o whi&h there sho"ld <e tal#s8 he said. I. 7o" do ot hold tal#s o these iss"es8 the tal#s will ot <e <e e.i&ial. )o 7o" wa t progress or A"st tal#sF We #a(t pro%ress a(d (ot tal+s 1or t!e sa+e o1 tal+s. We #a(t mea(i(%1*l a(d res*lt2orie(ted tal+s: !e said . Mr J"reshi was repl7i g to a >"estio o whether I dia wo"ld <e willi g to i &l"de iss"es li#e Kash%ir i the "p&o%i g parle7s. It was reall7 ot that i%porta t where the parle7s are held8 he said8 addi g (a#ista wo"ld approa&h the tal#s with a ope %i d. 5e1erri(% to t!e "as!mir: M*res!i poi(ted o*t t!at e&e( I(dia !ad started B*iet diplomac9 #it! t!e "as!miris . At the sa%e ti%e8 he said8 the shari g o. river waters was i%porta t <e&a"se (a#ista is a agri&"lt"re/<ased &o" tr7 a d 5* per &e t o. o"r water is eeded .or agri&"lt"re. Water tal#s I(dia a(d .a+ista( !a&e a%reed o( a roadmap 1or resol&i(% di11ere(ces o&er t!e s!ari(% o1 ri&er #aters i the e,t si, %o ths8 a se ior (a#ista i o..i&ial has said. (a#ista Vs I d"s Waters &o%%issio er Mr =a%aat Ali Shah i .or%ed the %edia a<o"t the road%ap a d said <oth sides had de&ided to hold two additio al %eeti gs o e at the e d o. Mar&h a d a other i =" e .or disp"te resol"tio . ;oth %eeti gs will <e i additio to the %a dator7 o e s&hed"led .or Ma78 he said. ;rie.i g Ao"r alists at the &o &l"sio o. a .ive/da7 visit <7 a tea% led <7 his I dia &o" terpart Mr 0 3a ga atha 8 Mr Shah &lai%ed the I dia side had agreed to (a#ista Vs de%a d that all water disp"tes sho"ld <e settled withi a agreed ti%e.ra%e.
11
Impacts
1-
Impacts
Empiricall9 de(ied2i(sta<ilit9 does (ot lead to escalatio( Martha ;rill Glcott has a ;.A.8 SUN@/;"..aloL M.A.8 (h.).8 U iversit7 o. +hi&ago. !/1-/0- B1"r%oil i
http4//www.&ar egiee dow%e t.org/p"<li&atio s/F.aGviewYidG-*3!6 a&&essed4 !/--/1*
T!e re%io( is also s*11eri(% t!ro*%! a c9clical dro*%!t. Water le&els i( /e(tral AsiaDs reser&oirs are at record lo#s: #it! *pstream pro&iders Q1aAi#ista a d K7rg79sta S holdi g <a&# s"pplies to dow strea% "sers QU9<e#ista a d Ka9a#hsta S.
Ele&tri&it7 &"t<a&#s .or .all a d wi ter have alread7 <ee a o" &ed. Hard/hit .ar%ers8 %a 7 o. who% lost their .ood a d seed stores d"ri g the wi ter8 %"st ow pa7 re&ord pri&es .or ."el a d .or seed. Ma 7 si%pl7 re."sed to pla t a d this s"%%erVs hot a d dr7 s"%%er %ea s lower 7ields .or those who did. All o1 t!is carries re%io(al implicatio(s. I( 17-7 a(d 1770: disp*tes o&er #ater a(d la(d led to
1i%!ti(% <et#ee( U@<e+s a(d "9r%9@ i( so*t!er( "9r%9@sta(: a(d <et#ee( Ta=i+s a(d "9r%9@ alo(% t!eir <order d*ri(% t!e #a(i(% da9s o1 t!e So&iet U(io(. T!e "a@a+!s a(d U@<e+s are lo(%2sta(di(% ri&als: as are t!e U@<e+s a(d Ta=i+s. Te(sio(s <et#ee( t!e latter came close to <oili(% o&er d*ri(% t!e Ta=i+ ci&il #ar: #!e( 1li%!ts <et#ee( t!e t#o (atio(al capitals: a(d t!e <order <et#ee( t!e t#o co*(tries is still lar%el9 closed <9 U@<e+ista(.
13
Impacts
No s!ot o1 US2/!i(a co(1lict or (*clear escalatio(. S&ott Moore8 U dergrad"ate 3esear&h Assista t8 East Asia No proli.eratio (rogra%8 +NS8 C&to<er 1'8 200$8
N"&lear +o .li&t i the -1st +e t"r74 3eviewi g the +hi ese N"&lear 1hreat8 http4//www. ti.org/e?resear&h/e3?'*.ht%l T!e last 1e# 9ears !a&e #it(essed %ro#i(% co(cer( o&er /!i(aDs (*clear #eapo(s post*re . A s"&&essio
o. U ited States gover %e t reportsM1N have e,pressed alar% over the evolvi g +hi ese "&lear do&tri e8 as well as the %oder i9atio o. "&lear .or&es. 1his i terest has <ee paralleled <7 a vi<ra t dis&"ssio i the %edia8 parti&"larl7 withi the U ited States. (ro%i e t i this dis&"ssio have <ee &o &er s over the i &reasi g &apa<ilities o. +hi aVs "&lear weapo s8 a d possi<le revisio s to +hi aVs lo g/sta di g pledge ot &o d"&t a .irst stri#e "si g "&lear weapo sM-N Qthe so/&alled INo :irst UseI do&tri e or <" sho",ia shi7o gS. Despite t!e t*m*lt: t!ere is broad consensus amo(% e0perts t!at t!e co(cer(s %e(erated i( t!is disc*ssio( are e-aggerated. T!e si@e o1 t!e /!i(ese (*clear arse(al is small8 esti%ated at aro" d -** warheadsLM3N =e..re7 6ewis8 a pro%i e t ar%s &o trol e,pert8 &lai%s that '* is a realisti& "%<er o. deplo7ed warheads.M4N I &o trast8 the U ited States has "pwards o. 1*8*** warheads8 so%e 28!** o. whi&h are operatio all7 deplo7ed.M2N Eve with proAe&ted i%prove%e ts a d the i trod"&tio o. a ew lo g/ra ge I ter&o ti e tal ;allisti& Missile8 the ):/31A /!i(aDs (*clear post*re is li+el9 to remai( o(e o1 Fmi(im*m deterre(ce .IM6N Si%ilarl78 despite &o &er to the &o trar7: t!ere is e&er9 i(dicatio( t!at /!i(a is e0tremel9 *(li+el9 to a<a(do( its No Eirst Use QN:US pled%e.M!N 1he +hi ese gover %e t has &o ti "ed to de 7 a 7 &ha ge to the N:U poli&78 a &lai% s"<sta tiated <7 %a 7 +hi ese a&ade%i& o<servers.M'N I s"%8 the 8 .ears over +hi aVs &"rre t "&lear post"re see% so%ewhat e,aggerated. 1his do&"%e t8 there.ore8 does ot atte%pt to dis&"ss whether +hi aVs "&lear post"re poses a pro<a<le8 ge eral threat to the U ited StatesL %ost sig s i di&ate that eve i the lo ger ter%8 it does ot. 3ather8 it see#s to a al79e the %ost li#el7 s&e arios .or "&lear &o .li&t. 1wo s"&h possi<le s&e arios are ide ti.ied i parti&"lar4 a de&laratio o. i depe de &e <7 1aiwa that is s"pported <7 the U ited States8 a d the a&>"isitio <7 =apa o. a "&lear weapo s &apa<ilit7. Use o1 (*clear #eapo(s <9 /!i(a #o*ld reB*ire a dramatic polic9 re&ersal #it!i( t!e polic9ma+i(% apparat*s: a d it is with a a al7sis o. this pote tial that this <rie. <egi s. S"&h a reversal wo"ld also li#el7 re>"ire &rises as &atal7sts8 a d it is to s"&h s&e arios8 i volvi g 1aiwa a d =apa 8 that this <rie. progresses. It &loses with a dis&"ssio o. the ."t"re o. Si o/A%eri&a "&lear relatio s. 1he +hi ese (oli&7%a#i g Apparat"s a d the N"&lear Cptio /!i(aDs leaders!ip !as toda9 ac!ie&ed <road co(se(s*s t!at t!e (atio(Ds i(terests are <est ser&ed <9 a sta<le a(d peace1*l i(ter(atio(al e(&iro(me(t.M5N 1his has give rise to the strateg7 o. Ipea&e."l develop%e tI Qhepi g .a9ha S o.te e%phasi9ed <7 +hi ese o..i&ials. 3i&e( t!e co(se(s*s to#ards moderatio( i(
1orei%( a(d sec*rit9 polic9: a(d its em<odime(t i( o&erarc!i(% (atio(al polic9: t!ere is m*c! to s*%%est t!at t!e *se o1 (*clear #eapo(s a%ai(st t!e U(ited States: in whatever situation: #o*ld <e a(at!ema to /!i(aDs decisio( ma+ers. T!e (e# %e(eratio( o1 /!i(ese leaders8 whi&h has rise to power i the a.ter%ath o. the 15'5 1ia a %e S>"are i &ide t Qli" siP: !as te(ded to co(sist o1 moderate tec!(ocrats8M1*N #!o are *(li+el9 to s*pport radical polic9 re&ersals: s*c! as t!e *se o1 (*clear #eapo(s. /!i(ese politics i( %e(eral !a&e also e&ol&ed i(to a Fmore pra%matic: ris+2ad&erseF 1orm.M11N 1his pro&ess was i itiated <7 the rise o. Ii terest gro"p politi&sI d"ri g the te "re o.
(reside t =ia g Re%i .M1-N
14
Impacts
No s!ot t!at Tai#a( #ar #o*ld %o (*clear. =oh .i+e8 )ire&tor o. 0lo<alSe&"rit7.org8 *-/*1/200$ 8 B+hi aVs Cptio s i the 1aiwa +o .ro tatio 8D
http4//www.glo<alse&"rit7.org/%ilitar7/ops/taiwa /pr&.ht% /!i(a #o*ld almost certai(l9 (ot co(template a (*clear stri+e a%ai(st Tai#a(: (or #o*ld Cei=i(% em<ar+ o( a co*rse o1 actio( t!at posed si%(i1ica(t ris+s o1 t!e *se o1 (*clear #eapo(s. T!e mai(la(dDs lo(% term %oal is to li<erate Tai#a(: (ot to o<literate it8 a d a 7 "se o. "&lear weapo s <7 +hi a wo"ld r" a s"<sta tial ris# o. the "se o. "&lear weapo s <7 the U ited States. A( i(a<ilit9 to co(trol escalatio( <e7o d Ide%o strativeI deto atio s #o*ld ca*se "tterl7 disproportio(ate destr*ctio(.
Eco(omic 1oc*s pre&e(ts co(1lict. Iva Ela(d8 dire&tor o. de.e se poli&7 st"dies at the +ato I stit"te8 =a "ar7 -38 20038 BIs +hi ese Militar7
Moder i9atio a 1hreat to the U ited StatesFD http4//www.&ato.org/p"<s/pas/pa462.pd. Hostile <e!a&ior to#ard Tai#a( co*ld dist*r< /!i(aAs i(creasi(% eco(omic li(+a%e #it! t!e rest o1 t!e #orld Lespeciall9 growi g &o%%er&ial li(+s #it! Tai#a(. Ceca*se /!i(aAs !i%!est priorit9 is eco(omic %ro#t!: t!e disr*ptio( o1 s*c! eco(omic relatio(s!ips is a disi(ce(ti&e 1or a%%ressi&e /!i(ese actio(s &is2Q2&is Tai#a( . A(9 attac+ s!ort o1 i(&asio( Q"si g %issiles or i stit"ti g a aval <lo&#adeS #o*ld li+el9 !arm t!e Tai#a(ese eco(om9 a(d disr*pt /!i(ese trade a(d 1i(a(cial co(tacts with 1aiwa a d other developed atio s #it!o*t %etti(% /!i(a #!at it most #a(tsLco(trol o1 Tai#a(. A( a%phi<io"s i(&asio(Li( t!e *(li+el9 e&e(t t!at it s*cceededL#o*ld pro&ide s*c! co(trol <*t #o*ld ca*se e&e( %reater disr*ptio( i( /!i(aAs commercial li(+s to de&eloped (atio(s.
12
Impacts
a(0iet9 a<o*t AmericaAs &ital i(terests. T!ird: despite t!e "remli(As i(cli(atio( to 1le0 its m*scles: 5*ssia 8 " li#e the Soviet U io a d &o te%porar7 +hi a8 is (ot a Hre&isio(ist> po#er t!at co(sta(tl9 see+s to c!a(%e t!e %lo<al <ala(ce o1 1orces i its ow .avor. S*c! e11orts reB*ire a( ideolo%9 a(d8 as a res"lt8 a s9stem o1 priorities: #!ic! Mosco# does (ot !a&e toda9 a d will hardl7 have i the ."t"re. What ideolog7 &a we spea# o. whe 3"ssia8 while passio atel7
de.e di g Ira Hs right to the Bpea&e."l develop%e t o. "&lear e erg7D a d a resista &e to Bpress"re thro"gh .or&e8D si%"lta eo"sl7 la" &hes a ro&#et .ro% its :ar Easter spa&e la" &h site Svo<od 7 that is &arr7i g a Israeli sp7 satellite i te ded to %o itor Ira Hs e..orts to develop a "&lear <o%<[ T!e s!are o1 t!e 3D. spe(t <9 5*ssia8 ow rolli g i petrodollars8 o( de1e(se Q3 per&e tS is e&e( less t!a( it did i 155-/155!8 a1ter t!e 5*ssia( Eederatio( !ad i(!erited a( a<sol*tel9 empt9 treas*r9 1rom t!e So&iet U(io(8 a d at least te ti%es less tha the Soviet U io did i 15'2. C the <asis o. its p"r&hasi g power parit7 Qi a<sol"te .ig"res esti%ated .or -**2S8 5*ssiaAs de1e(se spe(di(% QT4!.!! <illio S is more t!a( ele&e( times less t!a( t!e o*tla9s o( de1e(se i( t!e U.S. QT2-- <illio S. 6et: t!e most importa(t 1actor o1 co*(teractio( to a (e# /old War is t!e o(e t!at t!e "remli( strate%ists !a&e lo(% dismissed #it! co(tempt $ a%el78 p*<lic opi(io(. Neit!er America(s (or 5*ssia(s #ill s*pport a(9 co(1ro(tatio( pla(s o1 t!eir elites: as t!e9 #ill (ot &ie# t!em as (ecessar9 .
16
Impacts
1!
Impacts
1'
Impacts
a(d mea(s to deli&er t!em. I1 t!e Middle East co(1lict remai(s *(settled: the threat of a nuclear confrontation in the 1iddle +ast will be very high, #!ic! #ill lead to catastrop!ic consequences for the whole world.
Middle East co(1lict escalates , t!eir i(dicts do(At ass*me c!a(%i(% re%io(al d9(amics. Marti "ramer8 Se ior :ellow at the Shale% +e ter i =er"sale%8 We,ler/:ro%er :ellow at 1he Washi gto
I stit"te .or Near East (oli&78 a d Natio al Se&"rit7 St"dies (rogra% Uisiti g S&holar at Harvard U iversit78 =" e 1-8 200-8 B1he M7th o. 6i #age8D http4//<logs.law.harvard.ed"/%esh/-**'/*6/the?%7th?o.?li #age/ I still <elieve Middle East is less i tegrated tha E"rope8 <"t it does share o e .eat"re with earl7 -*th/&e t"r7 E"rope. U(til (o#: t!e Middle East !as !ad more %eo%rap!9 t!a( militar9 po#er. States !a&e <ee( *(a<le to pro=ect po#er &er9 1ar <e9o(d t!eir <orders. C*t t!e spread o1 missiles a(d: possi<l78 nuclear weapons8 co*ld c!a(%e t!at: lea&i(% states #it! too little %eo%rap!9 a(d too m*c! po#er. I( t!ese co(ditio(s: co(1licts t!at !a&e <ee( locali@ed co*ld <ecome re%io(ali@ed. I this &ase8 it wo"ld ot <e the Israeli/(alesti ia &o .li&t that wo"ld o&&"p7 the pla&e o. :ra &e a d 0er%a 7. It wo"ld <e the &o .li&t <etwee Ira a d Israel8 a d <etwee Ira a d the %oderate Ara< states. S*c! a co(1lict co*ld co(1i%*re t!e Middle East as o(e re%io( 8 &ollapse the dista &e <etwee the 6eva t a d the 0"l.8 prod*ce arms races: sp*r (*clear proli1eratio( a(d pro09 #ars: create ti%!tl92i(te%rated allia(cesLi( s!ort: ma+e t!e Middle East &er9 m*c! li+e E*rope i( its dar+est da9s . Whether the U ited States will a&t to a..ir% the pa, A%eri&a a8 <7 &he&#i g Ira Hs rise8
re%ai s to <e see . Whether or ot it does8 <"t espe&iall7 i. it does ot8 the &o%%o " dersta di g o. Bthe Middle East &o .li&tD see%s desti ed to shi.t agai . We %a7 the loo# <a&# with ostalgia to a ti%e whe the gra diose title o. Bthe Middle East &o .li&tD <elo ged to Israelis a d (alesti ia s. T!e (e0t Middle East co(1lict co*ld <e &er9 di11ere(t .
15
Impacts
<ecomi(% more di11ic*lt to preser&e t!e order t!at !as (*rt*red t!e peace o1 rece(t decades. Eco(omic %ro#t! is erodi(% t!e 1o*(datio(s o1 t!e re%io(al order: a(d t!e #or+ o1 <*ildi(% a (e# order8 o e that <etter re.le&ts the e&o o%i& realities o. the VAsia &e t"r7V: !as (ot <e%*(. Whe it does8 it will <e&o%e &lear that <"ildi g a sta<le ew order i
Asia will re>"ire sig i.i&a t &o &essio s <7 all o. the regio Vs %aAor powers. It is .ar .ro% &lear that the7 will <e willi g a d a<le to %a#e these &o &essio s8 a d the7 &ertai l7 will ot do so " less a d " til the7 " dersta d %ore &learl7 how %"&h is at sta#e. I. the7 are ot willi g to thi # i ew wa7s a<o"t AsiaVs order a d their pla&e i it8 #ar 2 s9stemic: catastrop!ic #ar 2 #ill <ecome disti(ctl9 possi<le.
-*
Impacts
alt!o*%! I(diaDs ass*red retaliatio( post*re ma9 deter .a+ista(i *se o1 (*clear #eapo(s a%ai(st I(diaDs ma=or cities: it !as (ot deterred .a+ista(i attac+s//<oth at the s"<&o ve tio al a d &o ve tio al levels//#!ic! ca( (o# <e ac!ie&ed #it!o*t 1ear o1 I(dia( reprisal. I deed8 t!e c*rre(t co(1i%*ratio(22a limitedl9 re&isio(ist .a+ista(: #it! a( as9mmetric escalatio( (*clear post*re that <l" ts I diaVs &o ve tio al power a d re ders I diaVs ass"red retaliatio post"re %ostl7 irreleva t//is acutely unstable. It was ot si%pl7 (a#ista Vs a&>"isitio o. "&lear &apa<ilities that &a"sed this state o.
a..airs8 give that (a#ista has had li%ited revisio ist i te tio s a d "&lear weapo s si &e 15'68 <"t its adoptio o. the as7%%etri& es&alatio "&lear post"re i 155'. 1he theoreti&al &o tri<"tio o. this arti&le is to s"ggest that the a&>"isitio o. "&lear weapo s alo e %a7 ot prod"&e a " i.or% deterre t e..e&t a&ross states. T!e selectio( o1 a partic*lar (*clear post*re//how a state operatio ali9es its "&lear &apa<ilities//does i(deed !a&e di11ere(tial e11ects o( deterre(ce a(d disp*te d9(amics . 1he e%piri&al patter i So"th Asia s"ggests that "&lear post"re %a7 there.ore <e a i%porta t o%itted varia<le i e,plai i g &o .li&t d7 a%i&s i the regio 8 a d that it %a7 set s&ope &o ditio s .or whe i tera&tio s are %ore or less sta<le at <oth the &o ve tio al a d "&lear levels. I additio 8 the ge eral patter //that di..ere t post"res &a have varia<le deterre &e e..e&ts//%a7 have s"<sta tial e,ter al validit7 .or other regio al "&lear powers8 <e&a"se the di..ere tial deterre t power o. "&lear post"res at vario"s levels a d i te sities o. &o .li&t derives .ro% a logi& that sho"ld <e valid a&ross other %idsi9e "&lear powers s"&h as +hi a8 Israel8 a d pote tiall7 Ira . C e at"ral >"estio that arises .ro% this .i di g is wh7 states sele&t the post"res the7 do. 1his is a >"estio I e,plore elsewhere i a e..ort to develop a rigoro"s theoreti&al a d e%piri&al " dersta di g o. the so"r&es a d &o se>"e &es o. regio al power "&lear post"res. 144 At the poli&7 level8 this arti&le highlights &riti&al deterre &e/%a age%e t trade/o..s ge erated <7 the as7%%etri& es&alatio post"re a d ide ti.ies a so"r&e o. deep i sta<ilit7 i the I dia/(a#ista d7ad. Alt!o*%! .a+ista(Ds
as9mmetric escalatio( post*re ma9 deter co(&e(tio(al attac+s: it also e(a<les .a+ista( to more a%%ressi&el9 p*rs*e re&isio(ist aims a%ai(st I(dia #it! little 1ear o1 retaliatio(: more 1reB*e(tl9 triggering precisely the crisis scenarios that magnify the risks of intentional or inadvertent use of nuclear weapons. T!ese c!alle(%es #ill o(l9 <e i(te(si1ied i1 I(dia//to redress its &"rre t per&eived paral7sis agai st persiste t (a#ista i provo&atio s//pro%resses to#ard a /old Start co(&e(tio(al post*re: #!ic! mi%!t t!e( p*s! t!e .a+ista( Arm9 to#ard a read9 deterre(t o( e11ecti&el9 !air2tri%%er alert. S*c! a com<i(atio( co*ld spa#( intolerable risks of accidental or unauthori/ed nuclear use . 3i&e( t!e pro0imit9 a(d d9(amic i(sta<ilit9 <et#ee( I(dia a(d .a+ista(: t!ese t#o (atio(s a(d t!e i(ter(atio(al comm*(it9 s!o*ld a#a+e( to t!e da(%er t!at t!eir co(&e(tio(al a(d (*clear post*res are <arreli(% to#ard i(creasi(% i(sta<ilit9 8 espe&iall7
whe &o"pled with (a#ista Vs growi g do%esti& politi&al volatilit78 whi&h %a7 ."rther a%pli.7 its s"pport .or s"<&o ve tio al atta&#s agai st I dia. I dia a d (a#ista sho"ld ta#e appropriate %eas"res to esta<lish &lear li es o. &o%%" i&atio 8 sig ali g pro&ed"res8 &o .ide &e/<"ildi g %eas"res8 a d te&h i&al sa.eg"ards to %itigate the ris# that s%all %isper&eptio s a d %is&al&"latio s &o"ld spiral to the i te tio al or " i te tio al "se o. "&lear weapo s. Altho"gh "&lear weapo s o the s"<&o ti e t are ow a irreversi<le realit78 "&lear post"re is a %allea<le varia<le. 1he U ited States a d the i ter atio al &o%%" it7 &a ta#e steps to help %a#e (a#ista Vs operatio ali9atio o. its as7%%etri& es&alatio post"re sa.er//%a#i g the %a age%e t o. the arse al %ore se&"re witho"t sa&ri.i&i g deterre t power//a d lea o <oth I dia a d (a#ista to wal# awa7 .ro% the d7 a%i& i sta<ilit7 i d"&ed <7 their &hoi&e o. &o ve tio al a d "&lear post"res.
-1
Impacts
competitio( <et#ee( I(dia a(d .a+ista( is especiall9 da(%ero*s. Acti&e Ra(d o(%oi(%P political disp*tes <et#ee( t!e t#o co*(tries !a&e res*lted i( t!ree past #ars as #ell as (*mero*s pro09 co(1licts . (a#ista i leaders i parti&"lar have &o &l"ded that their "&lear arse al has deterred I dia .ro% agai "si g its &o ve tio al .or&es to atta&# (a#ista i territor7. As a res"lt8 .a+ista(As implicit (*clear doctri(e pres*mes t!e possi<le 1irst *se o1 (*clear #eapo(s. T!e ris+s o1 s*c! te(sio(s are compo*(ded <9 t!e p!9sical pro0imit9 o1 t!e t#o co*(tries: as #ell as t!eir relia(ce o( <allistic missiles as deliver7 vehi&les8 #!ic! mea(s t!at earl9 #ar(i(% times mi%!t <e as little as 1i&e to te( mi(*te s. Altho"gh it re%ai s
" &lear whether I dia or (a#ista have &o%<i ed its "&lear warheads with their assig ed deliver7 s7ste%s8 s"&h a pre&ario"s sta &e wo"ld i &rease the ris#s o. <oth a&&ide tal a d &atal7ti& war Qa "&lear &o .li&t <etwee <oth gover %e ts pre&ipitated <7 a third part78 s"&h as a terrorist gro"pS. T!ro# /!i(a i(to t!e mi0: #it! .a+ista( at ris+ o1 &ie#i(% its o#( (*clear pro%ramme as i(creasi(%l9 i(adeB*ate as I dia see#s to a&hieve %"t"al deterre &e with +hi a8 a d the pi&t"re <e&o%es %ore &o%pli&ated. A(d add
i( t!e ris+ o1 #idespread political disorder i( eit!er I(dia or .a+ista(: #!ic! co*ld see a da(%ero*s political ad&e(t*rism as political leaders loo+ to rall9 domestic s*pport 8 a d the pe&"liar &halle ges posed <7 the regio <e&o%e &learer. 1he .a&t is "outh 0sia is particularly prone to a destabili/ing arms race . 0nd perhaps nuclear war.
--