Professional Documents
Culture Documents
By Grant Williams
To learn more about Grant's new investment newsletter, Bull's Eye Investor, Click here
9 December 2013
Mon(k)ey Puzzle
"Never interrupt your enemy when he is making a mistake." Napoleon Bonaparte "Don't confuse me for that other girl, She's a fraud and a fool. Don't confuse me with anyone else, I am not anyone other than myself." Maddy Kobar, The Songs of the Gullible Wiseman "We learn from failure, not from success!" Bram Stoker, Dracula "Smart people learn from their mistakes. But the real sharp ones learn from the mistakes of others." Brandon Mull, Fablehaven "Cats and monkeys monkeys and cats all human life is there!" Henry James, The Madonna of the Future
Copyright Mauldin Economics. Unauthorized disclosure prohibited. Use of content subject to terms of use stated on last page.
Hmmm...
THINGS THAT MAKE YOU GO
Contents
THINGS THAT MAKE YOU GO HMMM... ....................................................3
France Fights Back Against German "Sick Man of Europe" .......................................21 Hugh Hendry Throws in the Bearish Towel ........................................................22 Mexico Housing Hits U.S. Investors As Plan Collapses ............................................24 Weapons of Last Resort: ECB Considers Extreme Crisis Measures ..............................25 Greenspan Says Bitcoin a Bubble Without Intrinsic Currency Value .......................... 27 There Is Too Little Gold in the West ................................................................28 The Every-Which-Way-But-Down Market ...........................................................29 Kuroda $235,000 Salary Highlights Goldman Concern ...........................................31 George Osborne's Recovery Is Built on Sand .......................................................32 Japan's Abe Secures Passage of Secrecy Law As Opposition Revolts ...........................33
CHARTS THAT MAKE YOU GO HMMM... ..................................................35 WORDS THAT MAKE YOU GO HMMM... ...................................................39 AND FINALLY... .............................................................................40
9 December 2013
Hmmm...
THINGS THAT MAKE YOU GO
One night, amidst a terrible storm, a French chasse-mare (fishmonger ship) that had been pressed into the service of the Emperor capsized and sank off the coast of North East England, leaving a somewhat unusual but most definitely solitary survivor a monkey, who found himself washed ashore, exhausted, battered and bruised from his nautical tribulations but still clinging to the mast, which remains there to this day.
9 December 2013 3
Hmmm...
THINGS THAT MAKE YOU GO
One can only imagine how glad he must have been to end up on the golden sands of Hartlepool's beach. Unfortunately for him, he happened to be wearing a French naval uniform, which would, sadly, be the direct cause of his tragic demise a matter of hours after his miraculous escape from a watery grave. The best guess that historians can posit is that the monkey was dressed in a sailor's uniform for the amusement of the ship's crew, but the Hartlepudlians were most definitely NOT amused; and upon finding him sprawled on the sand clad in a uniform with which they were unfamiliar, they immediately arrested him as a French spy and proceeded to force the confused monkey to stand trial right there on the beach. The monkey was asked a series of questions designed to discover why he had come to Hartlepool; but with the monkey unable (or perhaps unwilling) to answer their questions, and with the locals uncertain as to what a Frenchman looked like, they reached the inevitable but for the monkey somewhat unfortunate conclusion that the monkey was a French sailor and therefore a spy. The monkey was sentenced to death and hanged from the mast on the beach. Music hall performer Ned Corvan immortalized the tale in "The Monkey Song," a popular ditty of the time that contains the wonderful lines: The Fishermen hung the Monkey O! The Fishermen wi' courage high, Seized on the Monkey for a spy, "Hang him" says yen, says another,"He'll die!" They did, and they hung the Monkey O!. They tortor'd the Monkey till loud he did squeak Says yen, "That's French," says another "it's Greek" For the Fishermen had got drunky, O! To this day, the citizens of Hartlepool are known, much to their chagrin, in England (and around the world) as "monkey hangers." Now at this point in the proceedings, you are no doubt thinking to yourself, "He's finally lost the plot. Where is he going this time?" Well, as you have indulged me and my tales of monkeys swinging from yardarms, I'll tell you. The people on that storm-tossed beach were confronted with something they didn't recognize, and though logic dictated that they ought to investigate further before they took any action, the animal spirits of a group of excitable people ensured that they forgot about clear-headed analysis and did something that their descendants still regret over two centuries later.
9 December 2013
Hmmm...
THINGS THAT MAKE YOU GO
Right now, today, investors all over the world are confronted by markets that have been dressed up for the amusement of the crew in charge of the ship, and nobody seems to recognize what they are looking at. Sure, they look like markets, but at the same time there is an unfamiliarity that is extremely unnerving to at least a few in the gathering crowd. The majority of the mob, however, have decided that they look enough like markets to charge in blindly in the expectation that all will be as it should. Things are not as they should be. Far from it. Everywhere one looks are signs that the markets are just monkeys dressed up in fancy costumes. Take the "benign" CPI levels which "prove" that inflation isn't a problem.
6 5 4 3 2 1 0 -1 -2 -3
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
Source: Bloomberg
US CPI has remained under control for the last three years as headline inflation has headed lower signaling both the fact that the Fed's aggressive QE programs have NOT impacted prices negatively (as many feared they would) and the fact that deflation remains a very real threat and justification for continued QE. Both of these signals clear the way for the Fed to keep on keepin' on with their money printing because it won't have hasn't had any inflationary effect. Perfect. Except...
9 December 2013
Hmmm...
THINGS THAT MAKE YOU GO
Jim Quinn of the Burning Platform reproduced a chart this week from Doug Short. It's one that surfaces from time to time, and it lays out beautifully the reality of inflation as opposed to the sterilized numbers produced by the government, replete with their hedonics and substitutions: (Jim Quinn via Zerohedge): First things first. Losing 39% of your purchasing power over the course of 13 years is criminal. This was purposely created by Greenspan/ Bernanke and the Federal Reserve. My annual salary has not gone up by 39% since 2000. Therefore, I've lost ground. I'm sure that most Americans have not seen their wages go up by 39% since 2000. But now we get to the falseness of the data. If the BLS measured CPI as they did in 1990, without all of their hedonistic adjustment crapola, it would exceed 60%. The housing figure of 39% is a pure lie. Even after the housing crash, the Case Shiller Index is 50% higher than it was in 2000. The houses in my neighborhood sell for an 85% higher price than they sold for in 2000. They can't fake the price of energy, so the 121% increase is real. They can't manipulate tuition costs, so the 129% increase is real. Are you really paying less for clothes today than you did in 2000? The 68% increase in medical costs isn't even close to the real increases, which are above 100%.
I wonder where taxes fall in the inflation calculation, because my real estate taxes, sales taxes, income taxes, and the other 50 taxes/fees I pay have gone up dramatically in the last thirteen years. No matter how you cut it, Federal Reserve-created inflation slowly but surely destroys the middle class and benefits the ruling class. Ben isn't working for you. His mandate of stable prices has been disregarded. He does not have it contained. Amen to that, Brother Quinn!
9 December 2013 6
Hmmm...
THINGS THAT MAKE YOU GO
The BLS's CPI statistics are nothing more than a monkey wearing a sailor's suit, I am afraid: the reality is completely different to that which is spoon-fed to the public. What surprises me is that the public are so willing to accept numbers they instinctively know are misrepresentative. John Williams of ShadowStats prefers to use the same methodology for calculating CPI as was used by the BLS back in 1980 before a lot of the "tinkering" took place, and guess what? Yep... inflation as calculated back then would have been significantly higher than as measured today. How much higher? Ohhhh, about eight times higher:
Source: Shadowstats
Funny old world. But it's not just energy, medical fees, and school tuition that are seeing significant cost increases. No. Spare a thought for collectors of vintage Ferraris, who have seen astronomical increases in price since the onset of QE, as you can clearly see from the chart (right) of the HAGI Classic Car Top 50 Index, which measures the price of a group of exotic cars. (FT): There was more money spent at the five leading auctions than ever before $302m in total compared with $258m in 2012. A Ferrari that sold for $27.5m at RM Auctions became nominally the most valuable "road" car sold at public auction; a W196 Mercedes-Benz racing car fetched $29.8m in July to set the highest price for any car at auction.
9 December 2013
Hmmm...
THINGS THAT MAKE YOU GO
Luxury home prices have also continued to spiral to levels impossible to fathom a few short years ago. (Forbes): This year kicked off with the news of a record-breaker home sale price: $117.5 million for a nine-acre Woodside, Calif., estate purchased by billionaire and Softbank chief Masayoshi Son, Japan's 2nd-richest man. It remains the highest price paid for a home in the U.S., ever. Although the news hit this year, the transaction was technically a 2012 sale.... Money manager Howard Marks, founder of Oaktree Capital Management, tops the list of 2013s highest sale prices at $75 million, the sale price for his Malibu estate. The property, situated along the scenic Pacific Coast Highway, sold in January to an anonymous Russian buyer, marking a record-high price for Malibu. Billionaire SAC Capital Advisors founder Steve Cohen gobbled up the second-most expensive property this May, a $62.5 million estate in East Hampton. In June, he added the $23.4 million Abingdon "Maisonette," a 9,600-square-foot triplex apartment in New York City's West Village, to his collection. Or, of course, there is the fine art market: (NY Times): A few weeks ago, a triptych portrait by the British modernist painter Francis Bacon sold for $142.4 million, a record for a work of art at auction. The next night, a silk-screen print, "Silver Car Crash (Double Disaster)," by the American pop artist Andy Warhol brought $105.4 million. And this week, "Saying Grace," by the American illustrator Norman Rockwell, sold for $46.1 million. The art market would seem to be going through the roof... Now, classic cars, luxury homes, and fine art all have one thing in common, of course: they are things that only the super-wealthy spend their money on, so you might well think that these assets are hardly applicable when trying to establish whether inflation is as benign as is suggested by the numbers or as rampant as the doubters would claim. But think about this for a second and ask yourself the following question: Where is the majority of the money printed in the name of QE going? Is it going to the man in the street? Hardly.
9 December 2013
Hmmm...
THINGS THAT MAKE YOU GO
US average hourly earnings have remained subdued since 2008, as the chart below clearly demonstrates:
4.0
Last Price
3.0
2.5
2.0
Source: BLS
... and the number of Americans who benefit from a rising stock market is hardly the stuff dreams are made of, if a recent Pew Research poll is anything to go by (although, as you can also see, high food and gasoline prices DO cause problems for most):
No. High inflation is seen in the items being sought by the real recipients of QE's largesse: the wealthy. But it won't remain confined to that tiny subset of society for long, I'm afraid.
9 December 2013
Hmmm...
THINGS THAT MAKE YOU GO
Just this past week, PNC released their annual Christmas Price Index; and, well let's just say, there is a bit of a discrepancy between those good old CPI figures and the reality of putting on a traditional Christmas: (Zerohedge): Over the past 30 years, the rise in the price of Christmas according to PNC's annual 12-days-of-Christmas price index has matched the CPI at around 2.9% YoY. However, in recent years, the reality is considerably worse than the well-managed inflation data the government proffers. The price of Christmas in 2013 is up a stunning 7.7% over 2012 the biggest jump since 2010' 9.2% rise. The biggest driver of the increase were the dancing ladies (must be the minimum wage decree?), though 8 items saw modest increases also. Once again, it seems the government's benign inflation data is fictionalized by reality's rising price of everything. Hmmm... But let's not get hung up on inflation. There are other monkeys on this particular beach that need closer inspection. Take for example something that has been receiving a good deal of scrutiny in recent weeks: corporate profit margins.
This chart shows US corporate profits after tax. As you can see, they are comfortably at alltime highs and screaming almost vertically higher on roughly the same trajectory they were in 2006/2007. It amazes me that, in a world where so much store is put into the idea of "sustainability," people are willing to apply the concept only to such things as pulling lobsters from the sea or vegetables out of the ground.
9 December 2013
10
Hmmm...
THINGS THAT MAKE YOU GO
Perhaps there is something I'm missing in the definition of sustainable. sustainable (adj). 1. Capable of being sustained 2. Capable of being continued with minimal long-term effect on the environment Nope. Pretty much as I understood it. But are these profit levels sustainable, I wonder? In his recent "Open Letter to the FOMC," the brilliant John Hussman took this metric a step farther and found some interesting data: (John Hussman): A simple way to see the implications of the present elevation of the profit share is to relate the level of profit margins to subsequent growth in profits over a reasonably "cyclical" horizon of several years. Remember, when one values equities, one is valuing a long-term stream, not just next year's earnings. Investors taking current-year or forward-year profits as a sufficient statistic should be aware that high margins are reliably associated with weak profit growth over subsequent years.
The next relevant question is to ask why profit margins are presently so high. One might argue that the profitability of companies has achieved a permanently high plateau. Despite historical mean-reversion in profit margins (which tend to collapse over the full course of the business cycle), maybe this time is different? I doubt it ... and so does John.
9 December 2013
11
Hmmm...
THINGS THAT MAKE YOU GO
Everywhere we look today, the beach is littered with monkeys in uniform that somehow just look wrong to the eye of a trained observer, and yet investors continue to stampede into markets simply because the Fed continues to print money. The Hartlepool Monkey's silence was taken as proof positive that he was, in fact, a French sailor. Similarly, investor complaisance today is a dangerous and ill-advised strategy. Citigroup's Tobias Levkovich recently highlighted a few other worrying disconnects that all point towards something being seriously awry: (Citigroup): While roughly 70% of companies have again beaten 3Q13 estimates thus far (with approximately 45% having posted results), one needs to recognize that the numbers came down from near 6% year-over-year expected EPS growth back in late June to less than 1% by the time earnings began to get reported. Moreover, a good number have made or topped forecasts on lower than expected tax rates or one-time items, suggesting that results were not necessarily comprised of high quality beats. Accordingly, it is challenging to argue that the reporting season has been all that good when some detailed insight is applied.
9 December 2013
12
Hmmm...
THINGS THAT MAKE YOU GO
While there is much discussion about companies being able to manage their businesses wonderfully and thus even small revenue gains can generate more impressive bottomline increases, this mindset is ill-founded, in our view. The broad data shows that overall S&P 500 operating margins have been flat to down for more than six quarters and the true story behind net margins has been lower effective tax rates and interest expense. As a result, the somewhat less than inspiring quality seen in earnings recently only supports this idea, and it may not be well understood by just headline-seeking investors. Hmmm... yet more evidence of mistaken identity on the part of investors. But the housing market is going great guns, right? Surely that is where we can find some uncomplicated signs that the most expensive "recovery" in history is picking up steam and is being driven by fundamentals rather than all that lovely fresh money spewing forth from the Marriner S. Eccles Building? (Ramsey Su): October New Residential Sales went up 25.4% from September. This is primarily due to the government shutdown, which gave Federal employees more time to shop for new homes. In addition, consumers realized that they can save so much on insurance with Obamacare that they can now afford the media room in their new Toll Brothers McMansion. Of course, except for the 25.4%, the above is all made up. In fact, the 25.4% is also made up, just not by me but by the Census Bureau. In numbers versus percentage, September sales were 354,000 and October somehow jumped to 444,000. Anyone with some common sense would question how an indicator such as new home sales can fluctuate that much from month to month. Setting aside the silly numbers, there is only one question: WHAT WOULD NEW HOME SALES BE WITHOUT FOREVER FED ZIRP POLICY AND IF THE FEDS ARE NOT PURCHASING $40 BILLION OF MBS PER MONTH, NOT TO MENTION THE $45 BILLION PER MONTH OF TREASURIES? In fact, if we ask the same question with every piece of housing data, we will arrive at the conclusion all data are meaningless for the time being. Fed policy is all that matters.
9 December 2013
13
Hmmm...
THINGS THAT MAKE YOU GO
Last week, FHFA released the Quarterly Performance Report of the Housing GSEs for the Second Quarter of 2013. THEY say THEY are making great progress. Here is an interesting chart from that report:
Is this rate of appreciation healthy? Is this a free market phenomenon or is it a manipulated outcome? Is the objective to inflate prices back to a subprime bubble high? Against this backdrop, one would assume that a reasonable policy maker should be considering tightening, or at least slow down the accommodations. Who would believe the FOMC see fit to keep rates low and buy $40 billion worth of MBS every month indefinitely? Actually, the Feds have purchased $736 billion for the first 11 months of 2013, far more than $40 billion per month. The current QE3 includes a stealth extension of MBS purchases under QE1 and QE2.
9 December 2013
14
Hmmm...
THINGS THAT MAKE YOU GO
Yikes! OK, so it seems as though the housing "recovery" may not be quite so robust as it seems at first blush, and if we strip out the hype about how well things are going relatively speaking, we can see, as my buddy Greg Weldon has been pointing out for quite some time now, that all we have managed to do is recapture previous secular lows:
(Incidentally, for a free trial of Greg's phenomenal work, simply click HERE.) The search for the recovery continues. The tail end of last week saw a healthy upward revision to US GDP and better-than-expected job numbers; so maybe, just maybe, we have some genuine signs there of the recovery taking hold? Maybe not. First up, Mike Shedlock on the Non-Farm Payrolls "beat": Some of the skew in last month's job report related to the government shutdown was taken back today, as expected. The labor force stats and participation rate were exceptions, and details reveal much weakness. Last month employment fell by 735,000 due to the shutdown, this month it rose by 818,000. Averaging the two months, household survey employment only rose by 83,000 (a mere 43,500 per month) Last month, the change in those not in the labor force was +932,000. This month, the change was -268,000.
9 December 2013 15
Hmmm...
THINGS THAT MAKE YOU GO
Last month the labor force declined by 720,000. This month it only rose by 455,000. Averaging the two months, the labor force fell by 265,000. This explains the drop in the unemployment rate despite anemic employment growth on average. Last month the participation rate fell 0.4 percentage points to a new low; this month, only 0.2 percentage points were taken back. Ignoring the decline and the rise in employment over the past two months, the huge discrepancy between the household survey and the establishment survey persists. In essence, this was a bad report, with people dropping out of the labor force like mad.... Were it not for people dropping out of the labor force, the unemployment rate would be well over 9%. Digging under the surface, much of the drop in the unemployment rate over the past two years is nothing but a statistical mirage coupled with a massive increase in parttime jobs starting in October 2012 as a result of Obamacare legislation. Digging beneath the surface, the snap-back from the government shutdown was nowhere near as strong as it should have been in the household survey. ... and now we'll go back to the work of Greg Weldon to see an illustration of just why the GDP revision was seemingly so robust:
Yes, the "strength" in US GDP came largely from the second-biggest quarterly buildup in inventories EVER.
9 December 2013 16
Hmmm...
THINGS THAT MAKE YOU GO
(Zerohedge): As we reported earlier, while on the surface the headline revised Q3 GDP number was a stunner coming at 3.6%, the reality is that more than 100% of the growth from the initial estimate came from a revised estimate of how many private Inventories were stockpiled in the quarter. The reality was that of the $230 billion in total increase in SAAR GDP, $146 billion of this, or over 63%, was due to inventory stockpiling. OK... so the housing recovery is not all it seems; GDP growth is reliant on inventory buildup; corporate profits, though already at all-time highs, are projected to continue climbing to evermore rarefied levels; real inflation is far higher than the government would have the world believe; and wages are stagnant. But what about elsewhere in the world? Is all that lovely money is generating real growth in Europe, perhaps? Perhaps? Errr... not really, no. (Zerohedge): Spain's youth unemployment rate has re-surged to a record 57.4% (just below that of Greece which still tops the scary chart list at 58%). Italy and Portugal also saw notable rises (despite the former's record low short-dated bond yields) at 41.2% and 36.5% respectively. Ireland and France saw modest improvements, but overall the Eurozone's youth unemployment just keeps rising. In spite of all the rhetoric from Merkel, Van Rompuy, and Barroso, 24.4% of Europe's under-25 population is unemployed... Unemployment is still a problem...
Source: Zerohedge
9 December 2013
17
Hmmm...
THINGS THAT MAKE YOU GO
1.35
1.30
Source: Bloomberg
... and the only reason it IS so strong is that the world realizes that the ECB is hamstrung by its mandate and the lack of cohesion amongst the members of the EU. Of course, that indecision is having a predictable effect on growth: (FT.com): Disappointing growth figures in the eurozone and Japan driven by weak export numbers have dashed hopes that a global economic recovery would gather pace in the second half of the year. Growth in the eurozone faltered in the third quarter, expanding 0.1 per cent following growth of 0.3 per cent in the second quarter. The figures came a week after the European Central Bank cut rates in response to fears about deflation. "The near stagnation of the eurozone economy underlines the fragility of the recovery and the growing dangers of a damaging bout of deflation in the region," said Jonathan Loynes, chief European economist at Capital Economics. The currency bloc's two largest economies both stuttered in the second quarter. Germany, the main eurozone engine, saw growth slip to 0.3 per cent in July to September, from 0.7 per cent, while France's economy shrank 0.1 per cent after hitting 0.5 per cent growth in the three months to June. The weak performance in France will cause concern over the durability of a eurozone recovery, which Brussels proclaimed in August had started to justify its crisis response of austerity and structural reform.
9 December 2013
18
Hmmm...
THINGS THAT MAKE YOU GO
Blame for the poor figures was placed on weak trade figures for France and Germany a day after the eurozone's economic engine faced accusations from Brussels that its export surplus could be harming the bloc's economy. Asia is no better, I'm afraid. Warning signs are everywhere. Take India, for example, whose problems were neatly summed up in a recent piece by Asia Confidential: (Asia Confidential): The largest signs of excess instead lay in Asia. I've mentioned the Indian stock market reaching record highs. It was only in July that the country was in turmoil with a currency in free fall. Since then, stocks have surged, out-performing all other major markets in Asia. The country's problems haven't gone away. The economy is still growing at decade-lows. The current account deficit remains one of the largest in emerging markets. And politics remain uncertain ahead of a general election next year. Now some will argue that the stock market is just forecasting a better economy ahead. Maybe. But your starting point is a market at record highs, on a not-so-cheap 16x trailing earnings, arguably distorted by low interest expenses given low rates. Sound familiar? Different continent, same lousy story. I could go on Japan, Australia, and the UK all seem far rosier when viewed through the prism of stock market performance and government bond prices than when examined realistically by means of a long, hard look at the underlying economies particularly if the necessary adjustment is made to account for the extraordinary level of stimulus applied by all and sundry. Which provides the perfect segue into today's final chart. My friends Raoul Pal and Remi Tetot of Global Macro Investor (one of, if not the, very best macro publications available anywhere) put this chart together for their most recent monthly and kindly gave me permission to use it. It is without question the single best chart I've seen to explain the reality of all-time highs on the S&P 500 in relation to the application of trillions of stimulus dollars. This chart obviously applies solely to the USA, but no doubt we would find a similar pattern in just about all the major, QE-riddled markets.
9 December 2013
19
Hmmm...
THINGS THAT MAKE YOU GO
The chart shows the S&P 500 deflated by QE and it's breathtaking:
20
S&P500 Deflated by QE
2005 - 2013
15
10
There's your all-time-high stock market, folks. Just another primate dolled up like a sailor, I'm afraid. Don't follow the crowd and dive into markets just because everybody else is doing so. That's how monkeys end up getting hanged.
******* OK ... so this week has been an interesting one. I began it in Singapore, spent 36 hours each
in San Francisco and Sydney and another 44 hours on planes, and end it in a full-length leg brace swallowing painkillers like they're M&Ms (acute tendinitis in my knee, apparently). Through the narcotics, though, I regret to say the world doesn't look any rosier to me. I was hoping for unicorns and rainbows but have encountered nothing of the sort.
9 December 2013
20
Hmmm...
THINGS THAT MAKE YOU GO
What did I run into? Well, Ambrose Evans-Pritchard's take on Franco-German relations, for starters; then Hugh Hendry doing exactly what I warn against in this letter; Alan Greenspan FINALLY spotting a "bubble" (though his reasons for calling it that either demonstrate that the Maestro has a wicked sense of irony or he really is clueless. You decide); and Alasdair Macleod explaining why there is just too little gold in the West. Mexican housing schemes go horribly wrong for US investors (who coulda seen THAT coming?); the ECB is considering "extreme crisis measures" (whilst simultaneously hailing the "recovery"); BoJ Governor Kuroda manages to be the poster boy for his own problems; and we hear how George Osborne's "recovery" is also built on sand. Maybe I should petition to have the quotation marks around "recovery" made permanent? Shinzo Abe tries an interesting tack to keep things quiet; my great friend David Hay of Evergreen in Seattle laments the "Every-Which-Way-But-Down Market"; and Nick Laird corrects an egregious error I made last week (thanks, Nick). Charts, videos, yada yada yada ... you know the drill, so all that leaves for me to say is:
Until Next Time... ******* France fights back against German "Sick Man of Europe"
The overriding strategic story in Europe today is the breakdown of Franco-German condominium. The two great nations have together run the EU on a foundation of equality since the 1950s, always finding some way to bridge the chasm between North and South. It was stretched a little after France lost Algeria a French Department, not a colony and with it lost population parity. But that hardly mattered as long as Germany wished to tuck behind France, usually letting Paris take the lead. It was stretched a great deal further with the Reunification of Germany, driven home a few years later when a Brandeburg "Ossi" who spoke fluent Russian but no French became Chancellor. The formalities go on. Angela Merkel and Franois Hollande still meet to celebrate the lyse Treaty of 1963: "Convinced that the reconciliation of the German people and the French people, ending a centuries-old rivalry, constitutes a historic event which profoundly transforms the relations between the two peoples. Recognising that a reinforcing of cooperation between the two countries constitutes an indispensable stage on the way to a united Europe, which is the aim of the two peoples "
9 December 2013 21
Hmmm...
THINGS THAT MAKE YOU GO
Yet it is a loveless marriage now. The two have been quarrelling over Libya, Mali, Syria, and much else besides. Nothing is quite as toxic as the fundamental clash over monetary union, and the deflationary bias of macroeconomic policy. Hollande campaigned on a growth ticket, pledging to end austerity overkill and to pull the eurozone out of depression. And yes, it is a depression. Output is still 3pc below the 2008 peak almost six years later, and industrial output is 12pc lower. As you can see from this Krugman chart, it is worse than the 1930s. Nor is there much evidence that this will change soon.
Instead, Hollande is subject to almost daily strictures from Germany on the need for reform. The language is polite mostly and much of the German critique is correct. France desperately needs reform. The encephalitic state is 55pc of GDP. The tax wedge is one of the highest in the world. But the French know that. The unsolicited advice is mixed up with a lot of ideology, Teutonic pedantry, and disguised self-interested. It is starting to grate on the nerves....
*** AMBROSE EVANS-PRITCHARD / LINK
Hmmm...
THINGS THAT MAKE YOU GO
The good news is that this has minimised our drawdown. The even better news is that our returns have improved lately; it looks as if we are entering a hot spell, and we have begun to re-allocate significantly more risk capital to our endeavours. So what makes me think we are heading hot at the moment? Let me tell you about the character of Bob Ryan, from the US cable TV show Entourage. The show chronicles the workings of Hollywood and Ryan is a legendary movie producer credited with a string of box office winners. His problem is that his success was rather a long time ago. So no one is certain of his skills anymore. His reaction is to make seemingly absurd promises think along the lines of "... what if I were to tell you that this movie will cost peanuts to make, will earn you four Oscars and will gross $100m... is that something you might be interested in?" In some walks of life (well, mine anyway) such is the popularity of the show that the expression has entered the modern lexicon as a catchphrase for offering up fantastical, if not actually impossible, ideas. With that in mind, what if I were to tell you that I have adopted a tactically bullish outlook? Is that something you might be interested in? Last bear standing? Not any more... I know what you are thinking. You are thinking that the last bear is capitulating. It isn't a good sign. Maybe it is that simple. But I think it is a little more complicated. We, and I accept we aren't the first here, sense that US monetary officials may now be willing to subordinate the demands of their own economy to the perils confronting emerging market economies. If that is the case, the great peril is not that the Fed finally tightens monetary policy and US stock prices suddenly tumble from what are very obviously overpriced levels. Would that it were our curmudgeonly portfolio structure (think dynamic volatility targeting and stop losses) works well with big stock market reversals. Instead the greater peril is that the current backdrop will turn out to mark a rapid acceleration in the ongoing move to the upside. A hint that this might be the case comes from looking back through the 113 years of price data for the Dow Jones Industrial Average. We have done this (so you don't have to), searching along the way for the comparable periods that fit most tightly to the last 500 trading days. What is clear is that periods of trading similar to the one we have seen over the last two years don't often seem to end quietly: they boom big time or they crash. Which is it to be this time? Looking at the markets of 1928, 1982 or even 1998, all of which have scarily similar looking historical charts to today's, we wonder if it won't be both. Starting with the boom bit....
*** HUGH HENDRY (VIA ZEROHEDGE) / LINK
9 December 2013
23
Hmmm...
THINGS THAT MAKE YOU GO
9 December 2013
24
Hmmm...
THINGS THAT MAKE YOU GO
Pena Nieto, 47, has passed sweeping constitutional changes to increase competition in the telecommunications industry and is pushing for an overhaul of the constitution to open up the oil industry to foreign investors. Yet under Pena Nieto the economy is stagnating. Finance Minister Luis Videgaray has repeatedly amended his 2013 forecast for gross domestic product growth; his ministry set it at 1.3 percent on Nov. 21, down from 3.5 percent at the beginning of the year. On Sept. 11, he told lawmakers that the housing industry was contributing to slow growth. Among the losers in the housing debacle is Pacific Investment Management Co., the world's biggest bond fund firm. Pimco said in a June 30 investment report that its holdings in Mexican homebuilders were partly to blame for a 6.6 percent loss in the second quarter of 2013 in its $1.6 billion Pimco Emerging Markets Corporate Bond Fund. (PEMIX) It was the fund's worst quarter ever. In addition to Pimco, losers in Mexican-housing stocks, bonds, loans and derivatives contracts included London-based Barclays Plc (BARC), BlackRock Inc.'s funds, New York-based Citigroup Inc., Zurich-based Credit Suisse Group AG and Frankfurt-based Deutsche Bank AG. None of the firms will disclose the impact on their portfolios of their Mexican-housing investments....
*** BLOOMBERG / LINK
9 December 2013
25
Hmmm...
THINGS THAT MAKE YOU GO
The ECB has already gone to great lengths to achieve this objective. It has provided the banks with virtually unlimited high credit and drastically lowered the collateral required from the institutions. The central bank has also brought down interest rates to historical lows. Since early November, financial institutions have been able to borrow from the ECB at a rate of 0.25 percent interest. By comparison, the rate was more than 4 percent in 2008. The only problem is that all those low interest rates have so far barely been put to use. Lending to companies in the euro zone is still in decline. In October, banks granted 2.1 percent less credit to companies and households than in the same period last year. In addition to a further cut in interest rates to zero percent, the central bankers are considering new, drastic measures to combat the negative trend. Some of them are likely to be hotly debated when the Governing Council meets this Thursday in Frankfurt. So what measures are still on the table and how would they effect the European economy? One scenario that drives fear into the hearts of all savers is the so-called negative interest rate. It would mean that the banks would have to pay a fee for the money they park, currently without interest, at the ECB a kind of penalty interest rate. The idea is to create an incentive for the institutions to loan out extra money to other banks, in Southern Europe for instance. This, it is hoped, would then lead to more lending to businesses and consumers. The penalty interest rate was already a topic at the last Governing Council meeting in early November. ECB board member Benoit Coeure recently confirmed that the negative interest rate had been discussed and considered from both a technical and legal perspective. "The ECB is ready," he said. It's questionable, however, whether the negative interest rate will actually be employed. Some economists doubt its effectiveness. "The question is whether the banks won't simply place less money at the ECB," said Hans-Peter Burghof, a professor of banking and economics at the University of Hohenheim in Germany. Thus, the problem of the lack of lending would not be solved. Experiences with negative interest rates have so far been rather poor. Denmark tried it in 2012 with an interest rate of -0.1 percent on deposits at the country's central bank. The result: Many banks simply passed on the higher cost to the consumer. The ECB already lent a helping hand to banks with long-term, cheap loans at the end of 2011 and during early 2012, lending financial institutions a total of 1 trillion for the exceptionally long period of three years a step it has so far only taken one time. Central bank head Draghi spoke at the time of using "Big Bertha," a reference to a World War I-era howitzer, to battle the crisis. As a monetary weapon, it had mixed results. Many banks used the cheap money to purchase loans that had been issued at significantly higher interest rates in their home countries. For banks and the countries, it was a lucrative business, but it wasn't an intended side effect....
*** DER SPIEGEL / LINK
9 December 2013
26
Hmmm...
THINGS THAT MAKE YOU GO
9 December 2013
27
Hmmm...
THINGS THAT MAKE YOU GO
9 December 2013
28
Hmmm...
THINGS THAT MAKE YOU GO
Using numbers from BP's Statistical Review and contemporary U.S. Treasury 10-year bond yields to gauge dollar returns, we can estimate gross Arab petrodollar income, including interest from 1965 to 2000, to total about $4.5 trillion. Taking average annual gold prices over that period, ten percent of this would equate to about 50,500 tonnes, which compares with total mine production during those years of 62,750 tonnes, over 90% of which went into jewellery. This is not to say that 50,000 tonnes were bought by the Arabs; it could only be partly accommodated even if the central banks supplied them gold in very large quantities, of which there is some evidence that they did. Instead, it is to ram the point home that the Arabs, awash with printed-for-export petrodollars, had good reason to buy all available gold. And importantly, it also gives substance to Frank Veneroso's conclusion in 2002 that official intervention i.e., undeclared sales of significant quantities of government-owned gold was effectively being used to manage the price in the face of persistent demand for physical gold as late as the 1990s....
*** ALASDAIR MACLEOD / LINK
Hmmm...
THINGS THAT MAKE YOU GO
Since then, the market is up another 8% and although it would be a stretch to call this gradual ascent over six months anything approaching the hockey stick-like finale typical of a rampaging bull market, there are some disquieting elements. As previously noted, there are plenty of signs of speculative fervor run amok if you look in places like the new nifty-fifty (Netflix, LinkedIn, Twitter, et al), the biotech index at 170 times earnings, bitcoins up over 5000%, or the growing number of business plans masquerading as companies going public at astronomical valuations despite an absence of profits. (In fact, 60% of IPOs are losing money, a level not seen since 2000.) Additionally, there are clear signs of recklessness returning to the credit markets to a degree fully reminiscent of the anything-goes lending attitude prevalent in 2007. Suffice to say, pretty much everything did go as in down the tubes, shortly thereafter. Yet, as all experienced investors are aware, markets can overshoot on both the up- and downside, often most dramatically. On this point, I read Jeremy Grantham's latest comments with great interest. As avid EVA readers (all three of you) are aware, Mr. Grantham and the firm he co-founded, GMO, has one of the best, if not THE best, records of forecasting long-term returns for the major asset classes. But notwithstanding his reputation for being a bit bearishly inclined, and his firm's long-range forecast of negative after-inflation returns from US stocks over the next seven years, he believes a further 20% to 30% spike by the S&P 500 is entirely possible. For a moment, let's just assume this "up-losion" plays out, as it easily could. That would be a wonderful thing, at least for investors who decide to jump in with both feet now, right? As they say in France, to just about everything, especially the appalling notion of a longer work week, au contraire! When good is badPerhaps it's just my oh-so-contrarian genetic disposition but I can't imagine a worse scenario than US stocks going vertical from here. Such a surge is almost certain to accelerate what are already near record inflows into stocks (admittedly, after years of outflows). Retail investors are increasingly growing very restive about not having enough invested in US stocks, often even if they are holding an "age appropriate" level. Another upside bolt is likely to prove irresistible to the millions who still hold trillions in cash. And, as those bulling stocks love to point out, valuations are not as egregiously elevated as they were in 2007, much less where they topped out in 2000. While this is technically true, given subsequent performance, it is also not especially comforting. Even the keeper of the Cyclically Adjusted P/E (CAPE), recent Nobel prize recipient Robert Shiller, conceded in a recent Wall Street Journal interview that the overall market is not in the extreme danger zone yet, though it is clearly well above its long-term average. He did state, however, that another 20% rise would push equities decidedly into the bubblesphere...
*** DAVID HAY / FULL COMMENTARY (EMAIL)
9 December 2013
30
Hmmm...
THINGS THAT MAKE YOU GO
9 December 2013
31
Hmmm...
THINGS THAT MAKE YOU GO
"Salaries for the Bank of Japan's officers are determined in consideration of the remuneration and other circumstances of national public officers, as stipulated by the BOJ Act," Yasutaka Hirata, a central bank spokesman, said without elaborating further. The nation's public debt has ballooned to more than 1 quadrillion yen and is expected by the International Monetary Fund to grow to the equivalent of 244 percent of gross domestic product this year, the highest ratio globally. Abe approved raising Japan's consumption tax to 8 percent from 5 percent in April 2014 and will decide whether to increase it to 10 percent the following year. "Considering Japan's finances, the sales tax may have to go higher even after being hiked to 10 percent," said Maiko Noguchi, a former BOJ official and a Tokyo-based senior economist at Daiwa Securities Co., Japan's second-biggest brokerage. "It will be a problem if the economy experiences a sharp fall every time the sales tax is raised and voters cry out in displeasure."...
*** BLOOMBERG / LINK
Hmmm...
THINGS THAT MAKE YOU GO
There is a long-standing joke in economics that forecasting is difficult, especially when it comes to the future. Along with many others, the OBR sharply cut its expectations last March just as the economy was turning the corner, thereby confirming a well-established failing in much forecasting; it unerringly seems to focus on the rear-view mirror rather than the road ahead. Many might therefore struggle to take the latest "back to where we were" forecasts too seriously. Indeed, the OBR itself seems pretty sceptical about them. This is not to argue that growth is about to deteriorate again. If anything, I suspect Mr Chote and his colleagues still somewhat underestimate the potential for expansion over the next two years. There's already a lot of momentum in the recovery. Yet if you look at the long-run OBR predictions, they haven't changed very much. Yes, the goal of declining public debt as a proportion of GDP is expected to be achieved a year earlier than forecast last March in 2016/17 rather than 2017/18. It is also true that the OBR now expects the Government to borrow 73 billion less over the next five years than it thought at the time of the last Budget. An improving economy will bring higher tax receipts. Perhaps more significantly, however, the OBR's forecasts for the underlying, "structural" deficit haven't improved at all. This is the sticky bit of the deficit that demands real surgery to make it go away the shortfall between spending and tax receipts that doesn't vanish simply as a result of normal cyclical recovery. Of course it is good news that the economy is growing much more quickly than most thought likely a year ago, yet there is also a sense in which this is only growth borrowed from the future. Without fundamental change to improve the productive potential of the economy, and cure it of its addiction to consumption, it will merely peter out....
*** UK DAILY TELEGRAPH / LINK
9 December 2013
33
Hmmm...
THINGS THAT MAKE YOU GO
The bill, which forms part of Abe's broader push to strengthen Japan's defense policy in the face of China's military assertiveness, stiffens penalties for bureaucrats who leak secrets and journalists who publish them. It gives government officials the power to define what constitutes a state secret under categories from defense to diplomacy, terrorism and safety threats. "There is rationale in the secrecy bill, but the government has been too hasty and has lacked efforts to provide a framework for information disclosure which is the flip side of secrecy," said Hidenori Suezawa, a financial market and fiscal analyst at SMBC Nikko Securities Inc. Abe offered to create additional oversight boards to try to address criticism that the law would allow the government to potentially hide any type of information from public scrutiny. The measure, criticized by much of Japanese media, has prompted rare public protests. Thousands of demonstrators gathered outside parliament this week, while the ending of debate on the law sparked an outcry from opposition lawmakers. Hideaki Igarashi, 40, who works for a trading company and was among the protesters outside parliament on Dec. 5, said he opposed the law because too much information could be classed as secret without external checks. "It looks odd that they're rushing it," he said. "If it was a good thing they could take time over it." The approval rating of Abe's government fell 4 percentage points from a month ago to 49 percent, the first time it dropped below 50 percent since Abe's election almost a year ago, according to a recent poll by the Asahi newspaper. Half of those surveyed opposed the bill that punishes leaks of government information with jail terms of as much as 10 years. The newspaper polled 1,001 people by phone Nov. 30 to Dec. 1 and didn't give a margin of error. Public criticism heightened after Shigeru Ishiba, secretary general of the LDP, wrote a blog post Nov. 29 likening those who demonstrate against the bill to terrorists. Abe prioritized the secrecy bill over pending economic measures aimed at ending 15 years of stagnation, reflecting growing regional tensions as China asserts itself. With the Diet not reconvening until January, it will take weeks or months for Abe to advance the "third arrow" of his economic plan after the monetary easing and fiscal stimulus that revived growth and drove stock market gains. "Abe must offset the negative impact of the secrecy bill on his approval rating by sticking to economic policies," said SMBC Nikko Securities' Suezawa. "I expect a deeper commitment to the three arrows next year." The bill passed less than two weeks after China established an air defense zone over a large swathe of the East China Sea that includes islands at the heart of a territorial spat between Asia's two biggest economies. The law will strengthen Japan's security alliance with the U.S., which has pushed for stricter controls on information to bolster intelligence sharing.
9 December 2013
34
Hmmm...
THINGS THAT MAKE YOU GO
As part of his security push, Abe also set up a National Security Council modeled on the NSC in the U.S. to better coordinate defense policy. Hes considering reinterpreting the U.S.-imposed pacifist constitution to be able to more freely use the countrys defense forces. U.S. officials have supported Abes push for collective self-defense and said they welcome the secrecy bill.
*** BLOOMBERG / LINK
9 December 2013
35
Hmmm...
THINGS THAT MAKE YOU GO
9 December 2013
36
Hmmm...
THINGS THAT MAKE YOU GO
www.Sharelynx.com
Over the last three years, Black Friday sales have accounted for anywhere from 51
Not many businesses can say they do more than half their season's sales in one day.
percent to 56 percent of all holiday season sales, according to per-person spending estimates from the National Retail Federation.
9 December 2013
37
Hmmm...
THINGS THAT MAKE YOU GO
Source: CNBC
Source: BFAds.net
9 December 2013
38
Hmmm...
THINGS THAT MAKE YOU GO
Bill Fleckenstein
is one of the best and most objective market observers around (and an incredibly nice guy to boot). Whilst I have finally found something to disagree with him over the potential future of Bitcoin hearing his considered opinions always makes me recheck my own. Bitcoin aside, Bill's views on the Fed's straitjacket and their loss of control of the bond market are fascinating, as always. CLICK TO LISTEN
9 December 2013
39
Hmmm...
THINGS THAT MAKE YOU GO
and finally...
We've all done it.
Every one of us has, at one time or another, sent a text message to the wrong phone number. Not many of us come up with the perfect response to those stray communications. Click on the link below to see 28 of the funniest responses to errant texts, including the lewd, the crude, and the downright hilarious. If you can get through all of these without laughing, you are a better person than me... Enjoy. CLICK HERE TO READ THE TEXTS
Hmmm...
9 December 2013
40
Hmmm...
THINGS THAT MAKE YOU GO
Grant Williams
Grant Williams is the portfolio manager of the Vulpes Precious Metals Fund and strategy advisor to Vulpes Investment Management in Singapore a hedge fund running over $280 million of largely partners' capital across multiple strategies. The high level of capital committed by the Vulpes partners ensures the strongest possible alignment between the firm and its investors. Grant has 28 years of experience in finance on the Asian, Australian, European and US markets and has held senior positions at several international investment houses. Grant has been writing Things That Make You Go Hmmm... since 2009. For more information on Vulpes, please visit www.vulpesinvest.com.
*******
Follow me on Twitter: @TTMYGH YouTube Video Channel: http://www.youtube.com/user/GWTTMYGH ASFA Annual Conference 2013: "Wizened In Oz" 66th Annual CFA Conference, Singapore 2013 Presentation: "Do The Math" Mines & Money, Hong Kong 2013 Presentation: "Risk: It's Not Just A Board Game" Fall 2012 Presentation: "Extraordinary Popular Delusions & the Madness of Markets" As a result of my role at Vulpes Investment Management, it falls upon me to disclose that, from time to time, the views I express and/or the commentary I write in the pages of Things That Make You Go Hmmm... may reflect the positioning of one or all of the Vulpes funds though I will not be making any specific recommendations in this publication.
9 December 2013
41
Hmmm...
THINGS THAT MAKE YOU GO
Use of this content, the Mauldin Economics website, and related sites and applications is provided under the Mauldin Economics Terms & Conditions of Use.
Disclaimers
The Mauldin Economics website, Yield Shark, Bull's Eye Investor, Things That Make You Go Hmmm, Thoughts from the Frontline, Outside the Box, Over My Shoulder, and Conversations are published by Mauldin Economics, LLC. Information contained in such publications is obtained from sources believed to be reliable, but its accuracy cannot be guaranteed. The information contained in such publications is not intended to constitute individual investment advice and is not designed to meet your personal financial situation. The opinions expressed in such publications are those of the publisher and are subject to change without notice. The information in such publications may become outdated and there is no obligation to update any such information. Grant Williams, the editor of this publication, is an adviser to certain funds managed by Vulpes Investment Management Private Limited and/or its affiliates. These Vulpes funds may hold or acquire securities covered in this publication, and may purchase or sell such securities at any time, all without prior notice to any of the subscribers to this publication. Such holdings and transactions by these Vulpes funds may result in potential conflicts of interest, although the editor believes that any such conflict of interest will be mitigated by the nature of such securities and the limited size of the holdings of such securities by the applicable Vulpes funds. John Mauldin, Mauldin Economics, LLC and other entities in which he has an interest, employees, officers, family, and associates may from time to time have positions in the securities or commodities covered in these publications or web site. Corporate policies are in effect that attempt to avoid potential conflicts of interest and resolve conflicts of interest that do arise in a timely fashion. Mauldin Economics, LLC reserves the right to cancel any subscription at any time, and if it does so it will promptly refund to the subscriber the amount of the subscription payment previously received relating to the remaining subscription period. Cancellation of a subscription may result from any unauthorized use or reproduction or rebroadcast of any Casey publication or website, any infringement or misappropriation of Mauldin Economics, LLC's proprietary rights, or any other reason determined in the sole discretion of Mauldin Economics, LLC.
Affiliate Notice
Mauldin Economics has affiliate agreements in place that may include fee sharing. If you have a website or newsletter and would like to be considered for inclusion in the Mauldin Economics affiliate program, please go to http://affiliates.pubrm.net/signup/me. Likewise, from time to time Mauldin Economics may engage in affiliate programs offered by other companies, though corporate policy firmly dictates that such agreements will have no influence on any product or service recommendations, nor alter the pricing that would otherwise be available in absence of such an agreement. As always, it is important that you do your own due diligence before transacting any business with any firm, for any product or service. Copyright 2013 by Mauldin Economics, LLC.
9 December 2013
42