Visual Inspection Pipe Report

Name [Block capitals]_STEVE HUGHES Signature SE Hughes__Pipe ident__E17_ Code/Specification used (YOUR CODE) Welding processMMA__Joint type Single V Welding position_____2G__Outside and thickness_219 x 7 mm Date__12 march 03 Weld face

Cap height 3max Cap width 12-15 Toe blend smooth Hi/lo 0.5mm

A
67

Stop/start Smooth 0.5 high 5 5

Undercut 1mm sharp 138 5

B Undercut
1mm sharp 15 5

Cap height 3mm Cap width 12-14 Toe blend sharp Hi/lo 0.5mm Undercut Undercut Intermittent intermittent 2mm sharp 1mm sharp 60 35 165 To

103

75

25 Arc strikes

100

50 Undercut Intermittent 1mm sharp

Pores (x3) 0 15

Grinding marks < 0.5 smooth

Undercut intermittent <0.5mm smooth Undercut 1mm 1mm sharp sharp 0 16 65 5 4 Undercut C

D
Arc strike 4 Arc strike 154 5

D
100

Stop/start Smooth 0.5 high 3

20

10

30

3 Porosity

60

7 Underfill

70

5 Arc strike

75

90

5 Undercut <0.5 sharp

Arc strike

Undercut 0.5 sharp

Undercut <0.5 sharp

Cap height 1-4 Cap width 12-15 Toe blend sharp Pipe Hi/loIdent__ 0.5mm E17___

Cap height 3 Cap width 12-15 Toe blend sharp Hi/lo 1mm

PTO for root P.T.O. [FOR ROOT]

Pipe root face

Penetration height 0.5 - 4 Penetration width Toe blend poor Hi/lo 1mm

Intermittent Undercut <0.5 smooth

A
Burnthrough (cont) 0 20

B
155

Concavity 0 5mm To C

2 Slag inclusion

70

10

90

Spatter

Concavity < 0 5mm Penetration height 0 -1 Penetration width Toe blend smooth Hi/lo 0.5mm

Pipe seam

25 Concavity (cont) < 0.5mm Concavity < 0.5mm 3 Incomplete penetration 112 1 160

Burnthrough To A

48

Sheet 3 of 3 width Penetration

WELD INSPECTION REPORT/SENTENCE SHEET Penetration height 0 - 2 Penetration height 0 - 4 Penetration width Toe blend smooth Toe blend poor Hi/lo 0.5mm Hi/lo 1mm

Print full name Specimen Number

External Defects

STEVEN HUGHES E17

Pipe/plate section 1 A-A A-A C-D A-A A-A A-A A-B/C-D A-A A-A B-D A-A A-A D-A A-A Defects noted Accumulative total 2 4 max Non uniform 7mm None None 2mm deep max 5mm/3mm None None x4 0.5 smooth None 1 max None Code or specification reference Section/ Maximum Accept/reject o Table N allowance 3 5 4 1.6 7.8.2 REJECT Uniform 7.8.2 REJECT None 7.8.2 REJECT --------------------ACCEPT --------------------ACCEPT 0.8 9.7.2 REJECT 13mm long 9.3.9.3 ------------------------------------------Not referenced Not referenced ---------------------3 7.2 ---------------------ACCEPT ACCEPT ACCEPT ACCEPT * ACCEPT ** ACCEPT ACCEPT ACCEPT

Defect type Reinforcement (height) Reinforcement (appearance) Incomplete filling Inadequate weld width Slag Inclusions Undercut Surface porosity Cracks/crack-like defects Lack of fusion Arc strikes Mechanical damage Laps/laminations Misalignment Longitudinal seams Root defects Misalignment Excessive root penetration Lack of root penetration Lack of root fusion Root concavity Root undercut Cracks/crackl-ike defects Slag inclusions Porosity Laps/laminations

A-A D-B D-A A-A B-D B-C/D-A A-A A-B A-A A-A

1mm max 4mm max 1mm None 0.5 deep 0.5 deep None 2mm None None

3 7.2 Not referenced 25 9.3.1 ----------------------1.6 max 9.3.6 0.8 9.7.2 ----------------------13 9.3.8.2 ---------------------------------------------

ACCEPT ACCEPT *** ACCEPT ACCEPT ACCEPT **** ACCEPT ACCEPT ACCEPT ACCEPT ACCEPT

This *pipe/plate has been examined to the requirements of [code/specification]API 1104 (19th edition).... .and is accepted/rejected accordingly.
Signature.......SE Hughes.............................. Date...........12 March 2003..........................................

*Delete which is not applicable

Use the other side for any comments

E233-97

* Arc strikes not referenced grind off and MPI/crack detect at company discretion. ** Mechanical damage not referenced but is smooth and not excessively deep refer to company. *** Root penetration not referenced but appears excessive at burnthrough refer to company. ****Root concavity assessed on radiographic density therefore must not exceed cap height-refer to graphs.