Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Web Site: www.ijaiem.org Email: editor@ijaiem.org, editorijaiem@gmail.com Volume 2, Issue 11, November 2013 ISSN 2319 - 4847
Decision Support Systems In Determining Lecturers Performance Appraisal Using Fuzzy Database Method of Mamdani's Model (Case Study at the University of Serang Raya)
Sumiati1, Shodik Nuryadhin2 .
Department of Informatics - University of Serang Raya Banten
Abstract
In determining the lecturers performance evaluation by the university both private and state is important, in order to improve the academic quality assurance. There are several factors that assessment. For the sake of efficiency and effectiveness of work then making the right decision is needed. With the aim to build and provide an alternative of a decision support system which has the ability of Lecturers performance appraisal analysis, in which each of the criteria in this case factors and alternative assessment in this case the lecturers compared to one another so as to provide the output intensity value priorities produce a score value of lecturers who provide an assessment of the performance of each lecturer. This study will analyze Lecturers Performance Appraisal-based intelligent computing system using Fuzzy Inference System with Mamdani method. The focus of research is more focused on faculty performance appraisal process. This assessment is based on the assessment of faculty performance, namely Tridarma and internal activity. The specific objective of this study was to evaluate the performance of lecturers in universities. Performance evaluation is an important issue for an institution of higher education, because it can be used as a reference in making decisions regarding the improvement of the performance, especially improved performance in the field of teaching. This decision support system to help and provide an alternative to the assessment of each faculty, the criteria change, It is useful to facilitate decision-makers on issues related to faculty performance appraisal, so it will at least get a decent lecturers were given rewards or awards
I. Preface
The importance of performance measurement is not needed and is done only in business but also in education. Thus the importance of performance measurement in the management of universities or education, the Directorate General of Higher Education put it in the format of the new management that aims to improve the quality of education on an ongoing basis. Improving the quality of education is done in a sustainable manner by incorporating assessment, accreditation and institutional self-evaluation conducted on universities both public and private (Soehendro, 1996). Either private or public university always working to improve the status of quality improvement / internal quality on an ongoing basis to obtain an increase in the quality of lecturers. To maintain the quality of the faculty, institutions routinely perform the monitoring and evaluation of faculty performance. Routine monitoring and evaluation of faculty performance bottleneck in its development with the increasing number of students and the limited number of officers. In addition to data processing only processed using Microsoft Excel software, until now there is no special software to process the data as a tool for monitoring and evaluation of faculty performance. The results of the monitoring and evaluation of faculty performance during this form of recapitulation sourced from questionnaire data related to student learning process and do not include the activities of lecturers in the field of research and community service. These problems have an impact on: 1. Takes a long time in doing student questionnaire data processing by the academic part. 2. Lecturers performance evaluation results are still incomplete because not include field research and community service. 3. Lecturer performance evaluation results are not in accordance with the guidance lecturer performance evaluations that have been established by the institution. 4. Institutional difficulty in determining policies related quality improvement lecturer as: further studies, training and rewards, no historical data of lecturer performance. 5. Become an obstacle to the improvement of institutional accreditation status as one of the accreditation assessment is a history of the activities Tridharma college by the lecturer within a certain time. This study will analyze Lecturers Performance Appraisal-based intelligent computing system using Fuzzy Inference System with Mamdani method. The focus of research is more focused on lecturer performance appraisal process. This
Page 302
Page 303
Variabel Menjawab Input Variabel Variabel Kedisiplinan Akademik Fuzzy Madani Variabel Performance
Figureure 3.1 Use Case Diagram 3.4.2 Activity Diagram Activity diagrams are part of UML is used to describe the stages of any existing business processes in order to more easily understand the business processes that occur. In the activity diagram for each activity presented by the rounded rectangle is linked with arrows to illustrate the transition from one activity to another. Activity diagrams starting from the initial state and ends with the final state
Proses Input
Hasil
Figureure 3.2 Activity Diagram Input upper limit and lower limit variable
Input Variabel
Variabel Performance
Proses Variabel
Hasil
Page 304
Fuzzy Madani
Cek
Benar Hasil
Lihat Laporan
Figureure 3.5 Activity Diagram Work Performance Report 3.4.3 Sequence Diagram Sequence diagrams describe interactions between objects in and around the system. Sequnce diagram between dimensions comprises vertical and horizontal dimensions. Sequence diagrams illustrate commonly used scenario or series of steps carried out in response sebuag event to produce a given output. Beginning of what is to trigger the event, the process and what changes are going on internally and what the resulting output. Each object includes actors have the vertical lifeline. Message berpanah described as a line other than an object. In the next design phase, the message will be mapped into the operating methods of the class Activation bar indicates the length of the execution of a process, generally begins with the receipt of a massage.
: Akademik
1 : Input Batas()
2 : Hasil()
Figureure 3.6 Sequence Diagrams Input upper limit and lower limit variable
Input Variabel
: Akademik 1 : Input Penguasaan Materi() 2 : Menjelaskan, Menguraikan dan memaparkan() 3 : Variabel Menawab() 4 : Variabel Kedisiplinan() 5 : Variabel Performance() 6 : Variabel Interaksi dengan mahasiswa()
Page 305
2 : Hasil()
2 : Lihat()
4. Research Methodology
This study uses the descriptive method of research, because it was felt that the issue being studied now by the facts that occurred in the performance of a lecturer at the University of Serang Raya. This study is expected to provide enter or support decisions about the relative value of two or more relative measures.
Page 306
No.
Lecturers Name
Output
1 2
3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14
Yanto Adjie Setya, SE., M.Si. Irwan Agustiansyah, S.Pd., M.Hum. H. Uus Muhammad Husain, Lc. Nana Umdiana, SE. Sulasno, SH., M.Hum. H. Anizir Ali Murad, SE., MM. Imam Fauzi, M.Pd Shodik Nuryadhin, S.Kom. Bohari Muslim, M.Pd. Drs. Rustaman Ridwan Santi Octaviani, SE., M.Ak Boy Perihatin, S.Pd. Deviyantoro, SE., MM. Rafiudin, S.Ag., M.Si
4,00 4,15 3,80 4,29 4,71 3,88 4,33 3,86 3,19 2,00 3,67 3,97
4,18 3,88 3,32 4,16 4,35 3,88 4,43 3,95 3,19 1,88 3,90 3,26
4,12 4,15 3,71 4,11 4,59 3,80 4,23 3,86 2,77 2,02 3,73 3,76
Page 307
26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37
3,24 4,20 4,09 4,50 2,90 3,71 3,47 4,07 3,24 3,75 3,48 4,00
3,00 4,30 4,23 4,31 2,71 3,41 3,79 4,19 3,00 4,13 2,87 3,84
3,13 4,42 4,15 4,30 2,84 3,49 3,57 4,14 3,25 3,99 3,01 3,97
Page 308
Table 5.2 Variables and Universe Discussion Function Variable Name NR_ Material Mastery Universe Discussion [ 2.25 4.64] Explanation Average scores of respondents variabel Material Mastery Average scores of respondents variabel Describes outlining and describing Average scores of respondents variabel Question answering Average scores of respondents variabel Discipline Average scores of respondents variabel Performance Average scores of respondents variabel Interaction with students Value that meets lecturer performance appraisal so get reward
NR_ Describes outlining and describing NR_ Variabel Question answering NR_Variabel Discipline
[2.25 4.50 ]
[1.88 4.59]
Input
[1.42- 4.76]
[ 2.00- 4.71]
[1.77 4.43]
[ 1.89 4.59]
Fungsi
Nama Variabel NR_ Material Mastery NR_ Menjelaskan Menguraikan danmemapark an NR_ Variabel Question
Table 5. 3. The Set of Fuzzy Semesta Himpunan Fuzzy pembicaraan Low Middle [ 2.25 4.64] High Low Middle High Low Middle
Domain [2.25 3.00] [2.25 4.64] [ 3.50 - 4.64 ] [2.25 3.00 ] [2.25 4.50 ] [ 3.50 - 4.50 ] [1.88 3.00 ] [2.25 4.59 ]
Input
[2.25 4.50 ]
[1.88 4.59]
Page 309
[1.42- 4.76]
[ 2.00- 4.71]
[1.77 4.43]
[ 1.89 4.59]
Page 310
Figure 5.6. Graphs degree of membership to NR_ Interactions with Students Proses selanjutnya adalah melakukan inferensi terhadap Variabel Penilaian Kierja Dosen dengan cara yang sama di atas, pada kasus ini kami menggunakan fungsi trapesium untuk mendefinisikan nilai linguistik nya sebagai berikut (lihat gambar 5.7) :
Figure 5.7. Inference Graph Variable Performance Assessment lecturer By using Mamdani inference method, obtained by using a process of inference rules CONJUNCTION (^) of the eight new rules above, to take a minimum degree of membership from the existing linguistic value. Here is a new temporary rule obtained: 1) If NR_Material Mastery Rendah (1.58) AND NR_ Menjelaskan Menguraikan danmemaparkan Rendah (1.08) AND NR_ Variabel Question answering Rendah (1.4) AND NR_Variabel Discipline Rendah (0.88) AND NR_ NR_ performance Rendah (0.75) AND NR_ Interaction with students Rendah (1.33) Then Penilaian Kinerja Sedang (0.75) 2.) If NR_Material Mastery Rendah (1.58) AND NR_ Describes outlining and describing Sedang (0.57) AND NR_ Variabel Question answering Sedang (0.63) AND NR_Variabel Discipline Sedang (0.88) AND NR_ NR_ performance Rendah (0.75) AND NR_ Interaction with students Sedang(0.63) Then Penilaian Kinerja Sedang (0.57) 3) If NR_Material Mastery Sedang(0.47) AND NR_ Describes outlining and describing Rendah (1.08) AND NR_ Variabel Question answering Rendah (1.4) AND NR_Variabel Discipline Rendah(0.88) AND NR_ NR_ performance Rendah (0.75) AND NR_ Interaction with students Sedang (0.63) Then Penilaian Kinerja Sedang (0.47) 4) If NR_Material Mastery Sedang (0.47) AND NR_ Describes outlining and describing Sedang (0.57)AND NR_ Variabel Question answering Sedang(0.63) AND NR_Variabel Discipline Sedang ( 0.88) AND NR_ NR_ performance Sedang (0.86) AND NR_ Interaction with students Sedang (0.63) Then Penilaian Kinerja Sedang (0.47) 5) If NR_Material Mastery Rendah (1.58) AND NR_ Describes outlining and describing Rendah (1.08) AND NR_ Variabel Question answering Rendah (1.4) AND NR_Variabel Discipline Rendah(0.88) AND NR_ NR_ performance Rendah (0.75) AND NR_ Interaction with students Rendah (1.33) Then Penilaian Kinerja Sedang (0.75) 6) If NR_Material Mastery Sedang (0.47) AND NR_ Describes outlining and describing Rendah (1.08) AND NR_ Variabel Question answering Sedang(0.63) AND NR_Variabel Discipline Sedang (0.88) AND NR_ NR_ performance Sedang (0.86) AND NR_ Interaction with students Sedang (0.63) Then Penilaian Kinerja Sedang (0.47) 7) If NR_Material Mastery Rendah (1.58) AND NR_ Describes outlining and describing Sedang (0.57) AND NR_ Variabel Question answering Rendah (1.4) AND NR_Variabel Discipline Rendah (0.88) AND NR_ NR_ performance Rendah (0.75) AND NR_ Interaction with students Rendah (1.33) Then Penilaian Kinerja Sedang (0.57) 8) If NR_Material Mastery Sedang (0.47) AND NR_ Menjelaskan Penilaian Kinerja Menguraikan dan memaparkan Sedang (0.57) AND NR_ Variabel Question answering Sedang (0.63) AND NR_Variabel Discipline Sedang (0.88) AND NR_ NR_ performance Sedang (0.86) AND NR_ Interaction with students Sedang (0.63) Then Penilaian Kinerja Sedang (0.47)
Page 311
Page 312
Page 313
Page 314
Page 315
Page 316
Page 317
Page 318
Testing of the other data then done using tools Fuzzy inference System (FIS) in MATLAB and obtained the following results:
No. Nama Dosen 1 1 2 3 4 Yanto Adjie Setya, SE., M.Si. Irwan Agustiansyah, S.Pd., M.Hum. H. Uus Muhammad Husain, Lc. Nana Umdiana, SE. 4,19 3,97 4,29 4,45 2 3,81 3,84 4,06 4,36 3 4,06 3,94 4,12 4,33 4 3,66 3,75 4,06 3,70 5 3,75 3,88 4,00 4,15 6 4,00 3,81 4,18 3,88 3,84 3,86 3,88 3,85 RATA RATA URAIAN YANG DINILAI Outp ut
Page 319
Page 320
Page 321
Page 322
Conclusion
From the results, analysis and discussion has been done in this study, several conclusions can be taken as follows: 1. Decision support system for evaluation of the performance of the lecturer at the University of Serang City, which refers to high school drama tri integrated using Fuzzy inference System and method Mamdani 2. This decision support system to assist and provide alternatives in conducting an assessment of each faculty to change the criteria, decision makers associated with the problem of performance assessment professors, lecturers get to be the most worthy of reward or recognition.
Daftar Pustaka
[1] Hamzah,Suyoto,Paulus Mudjihartono(2010). Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Penilaian Kinerja Dosen dengan metode balance Scorecard ( Studi Kasus: Universitas Respati Yogyakarta), Seminar Nasional informatika 2010 (SemnasIF2010) UPN veteran Yogyakarta [2] Handoyo Soemantri, (2011). Rancangan Pengukuran Kinerja Dosen menggunakan Fuzzy MCDM, Proceedings Jurnal Informatika &Komputasi STIMIK Indonesia,Vol 5 (1),ISSN 141-0232 [3] Jogiyanto. 2008. Sistem Teknologi Informasi. Penerbit Andi. Yogyakarta. Linda Atika , (2010) .Sistem Penunjang Keputusan Penilaian Kinerja Pemilihan Dosen berprestasi menggunakan metode AHP, Proceedings jurnal ilmiah Vol.12 No.3
Page 323
AUTHOR
Page 324