You are on page 1of 57

Part 3:

PM CASE STUDIES

PREVENTIVE MAINTENANCE PLANNING


P2: The yearly PM programs information for six similar gas
turbines in a power station are as follows:
1- PM information:
Maintenance levels per gas turbine
Spare
No. of
PM Type Frequency Duration
parts Cost
Workers
$1000
Y Level 1
Yearly
15 days
20
10
S Level 2
6 Monthly 10 days
20
8
3M Level 3 3 Monthly
5 days
15
5
M Level 4
Monthly
2 days
10
2
2- Working conditions:
Gas turbine operating conditions: 24 hour/day
Workers operating conditions: 300 day/year & 8 hour/day
3- CM information:

Average effort of CM = 380 man-day per gas turbine


Average annual spare parts CM = $ 12000 per gas turbine
Average CM downtime = 15 days/year per gas turbine
Average downtime cost rate = $ 1000 per day

4- Cost rates:
Average labor cost rate = $ 10 per man-day
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Part 3: PM Case Studies
-1 -

Overhead cost = 25 % direct cost (spare parts & labor)

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Part 3: PM Case Studies


-2 -

Required:
1)
2)
3)
4)
5)
6)
7)
8)

The size of maintenance labor force.


Average system availability.
Annual downtime cost losses.
Annual maintenance cost.
Annual PM plan.
Maintenance resource profiles.
Monthly PM plans.
Maintenance work order

The size of maintenance labor force


PM
Type
Y
S
3M
M

Annual Duration No. of


Man-day
Frequency
(day)
Worker
per PM type
1
15
20
300 * 1= 300
1
10
20
200 * 1 = 200
2
5
15
75 * 2 = 150
8
2
10
20 * 8 = 160

Annual PM man-day per gas turbine


Total PM annual man-day Required

810
810 * 6 = 4860

The size of PM labor force = 4860/300 =16.2 = 17 workers


The size of CM labor force = 380 * 6 / 300 = 8 workers
Total labor force = 17 + 8 = 25 workers
Crew check is ok (25 more than 20).

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Part 3: PM Case Studies


-3 -

The average down time per year


PM Type
Y
S
3M
M

Annual
Frequency
1

Duration
(day)
15

PM Downtime
(day)
15 * 1= 15

1
2
8

10
5
2

10 * 1 = 10
5 * 2 = 10
2 * 8 = 16

PM downtime per gas turbine

51

Average down time = 51 + 15 = 66 day/year per gas turbine


Annual downtime cost losses = 66 * 6 * 1000 = $ 396000
Average equipment availability =
Active operating time / Total time
= (364 66) / 364 = 82 %
System Reliability:
Series or chain structure: Rs = R1 * R2 * R3 * etc.
Parallel structure: Rs = 1 (1-R1)* (1-R2)* (1-R3) * .etc.
System time availability =
Parallel structure: As = 1 (1-A1)**6
= 1 (1-0.82)**6
= 1 (0.18)**6 = 99%

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Part 3: PM Case Studies


-4 -

Annual maintenance cost


PM Type
Y
S
3M
M

Annual
Frequency
1
1
2
8

Cost
$1000
10
8
5
2

Spare parts PM
Cost $1000
10 * 1= 10
8*1=8
5 * 2 = 10
2 * 8 = 16

Annual spare parts PM per gas turbine


44
=
Total annual spare parts PM cost =
44 * 6 = 264
The average annual spare parts CM cost =
$ 12000 * 6 = $ 72,000
Annual spare parts maintenance cost =
264000 + 72000 = $ 336,000
Annual labor cost =
25 workers * 300 day/year * $ 10 per man-day= $ 75,000
Annual direct maintenance cost = $ 336000 + $ 75000
= $ 411000
Overhead cost = 25 % direct cost
Annual maintenance cost = $ 411000 * 1.25 = $ 513750
Annual maintenance cost
= $ 513750
Annual downtime cost losses = $ 396000
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Part 3: PM Case Studies
-5 -

Basic Annual PM Plan


Eq.
code
G01
G02
G03
G04
G05
G06

Month #
6
7

3M

3M

M
M
S
M
M

M
3M
M
M
3M

Y
M
M
S
M

M
M
3M
M
M

M
Y
M
M
S

3M
M
M
3M
M

M
M
Y
M
M

M
3M
M
M
3M

S
M
M
Y
M

M
M
3M
M
M

M
S
M
M
Y

3M
M
M
3M
M

10

11

12

Resource analysis:
Manday
Day/
month
Workers
SP cost
DT

580 230 580 230 580 230 580 230 580 230 580 230
24

24

24

24

24

24

24

24

24

24

24

24

24
26
33

10
18
18

24
26
33

10
18
18

24
26
33

10
18
18

24
26
33

10
18
18

24
26
33

10
18
18

24
26
33

10
18
18

Y= 300 S= 200
Y= 10 S= 8
Y= 15 S= 10

3M= 75
3M= 5
3M= 5

M= 20
M= 2
M= 2

man-day
$1000
day

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Part 3: PM Case Studies


-6 -

Target Annual PM Plan # 1


Eq.
code

Month #

G01
G02
G03
G04
G05
G06

10 11 12

3M

3M

M M Y
M 3M M
M
S
M
3M M M
M M 3M

M
M
M
S
M

M 3M M M S
Y M M 3M M
3M M M
Y
M
M M 3M M M
M
S
M M 3M

M
M
M
Y
M

M 3M
S M
3M M
M M
M
Y

Resource analysis:
Manday
Workers
SP cost
DT

455 355 455 355 455 355 355 455 355 455 355 455
19
23
28

15
21
23

19
23
28

15
21
23

Y= 300 S= 200
Y= 10 S= 8
Y= 15 S= 10

19
23
28

15
21
23

3M= 75
3M= 5
3M= 5

15
21
23

19
23
28

M= 20
M= 2
M= 2

15
21
23

19
23
28

15
21
23

19
23
28

man-day
$1000
day

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Part 3: PM Case Studies


-7 -

Target Annual PM Plan # 2


Eq.
code

Month #

G01
G02
G03
G04
G05
G06

10 11 12

3M

3M

M
M
M
M
M

M
3M
S
M
3M

Y
M
M
M
M

M
M
3M
S
M

M
Y
M
M
M

3M
M
M
3M
S

M
M
Y
M
M

M
3M
M
M
3M

M
M
M
Y
M

S
M
3M
M
M

M
M
M
M
Y

3M
S
M
3M
M

Resource analysis:
Manday
Workers
SP cost
DT

400 410 400 410 400 410 400 410 400 410 400 410
17
20
25

17
24
26

17
20
25

17
24
26

Y= 300 S= 200
Y= 10 S= 8
Y= 15 S= 10

17
20
25

17
24
26

3M= 75
3M= 5
3M= 5

17
20
25

17
24
26

M= 20
M= 2
M= 2

17
20
25

17
24
26

17
20
25

17
24
26

man-day
$1000
day

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Part 3: PM Case Studies


-8 -

Monthly Maintenance Plan: Month # 1


Day
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
17.
18.
19.
20.
21.
22.
23.
24.
25.
26.
27.
28.
29.
30.
31.

G01
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
SB

G02

G03

G04

G05

G06

M
M
SB
M
M
SB
M
M
SB
M
M
SB
M
M
SB

PM worker
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
-

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Part 3: PM Case Studies


-9 -

MAINTENANCE WORK ORDER


010120
Requester Section:
Power Station PS03 - Gas Turbine G01 - Priority: A
Maintenance type/level: Annual PM
1- Check .
2- Clean ..
3- Replace ..
4- Adjust
5- Repair ..
Eng. Attia Gomaa
Planning Section:
Labor: 4 Mech. 2 Helper
5 days
5 Elec. 4 Helper
10 days
Spare parts: 2 valve xx1, 4 air filter yy3, .. etc.
Special tools: xxx, yyyy, etc,
Expected down time (from 01/01 to 15/01/2004)
Cost estimation ($ 10,000)
Safety instructions:
- Check
Eng. Aly Ahmed
Craft Feedback:
1- Check .
2- Clean ..
3- Replace ..
4- Adjust
5- Repair ..
Labor: 3 Mech. 2 Helper
5 days
6 Elec.
3 Helper
11 days
1 Vib.
1 Helper
2 days
Spare parts: 2 valve xx1, 4 air filter yy3, .. etc.
Special tools: Vibrometer, etc,
Down time (01/01 to 17/01/2004) Actual Cost ($ 12,000)
Eng. Omer Aly

Coding:
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Part 3: PM Case Studies
- 10 -

P3: The yearly PM programs information for four similar


gas turbines (GT01 through GT04) in a power station are as
follows:
PM Level

Maintenance levels per gas turbine


Frequency
PM
Maint.
No. of
Type
duration workers

Spare
parts
cost $1000
10
8
5
2
---

Y Level 1 Yearly
Shutdown 14 day
20
S Level 2
6 Monthly Shutdown 7 day
15
3M Level 3 3 Monthly Shutdown 4 day
10
M Level 4 Monthly
Shutdown 2 day
8
W Level 5 Weekly
Running 5 hours
2
D Level 6 Daily
Running 1 hours
2
Gas turbine operating conditions: 24 hour/day
Workers operating conditions: 300 day/year & 8 hour/day
Average effort of CM = 380 man-day per gas turbine
Average annual CM cost = $ 12000 per gas turbine
Average CM downtime = 15 days/year per gas turbine
Average downtime cost rate = $ 1000 per day
Labor cost rate = $ 10 per man-day
Overhead cost = 25 % direct cost (spare parts & labor)

Required:
1. The size of maintenance labor force.
2. Average system availability.
3. Annual PM plan.
4. Annual downtime cost losses.
5. Annual maintenance cost.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Part 3: PM Case Studies


- 11 -

P4:
The yearly PM programs information for six similar fire tube
boilers (FB01 through FB06) in a textile company are as
follows:

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Part 3: PM Case Studies


- 12 -

Preventive Maintenance Program:


Daily
(Running)

Weekly
Monthly
(Shutdown)
(Shutdown)
Check for tight
closing of fuel
Inspect burner
valves
Check fuel and Analyze
air linkage
combustion
Check indicating
Check cams
lights and alarms

S. Annually
(Shutdown)
Clean low
Check water
water cutlevel
off(s)
Blowdown
Check oil
boiler
preheater
Blowdown
Inspect
water column
refractory
Check
Clean oil
Check operating Inspect for flue
combustion
pump strainer
and limit controls gas leaks
visually
and filter
Treat water
Clean air
Check safety
according to the
Inspect for hot cleaner and
and interlock
established
spots
air/oil
controls
program
separator
Record boiler
Check low water Review boiler Check pump
operating
cutoff(s)
blowdown
coupling
pressure/
operation
procedures
alignment
temperature
Check for leaks,
Record feed
Check
noise, vibration,
Reset
water pressure/
combustion air
unusual
combustion
temperature
supply
conditions
Inspect
Record flue gas Check operation Check all filter
mercury
temperature
of all motors
elements
switches
Record oil
Check general Check fuel
pressure and
burner operation systems
temperature

Annually
(Shutdown)
Clean fireside
surfaces
Clean breeching
Clean waterside
surfaces
Check oil storage
tanks
Check fluid levels
on hydraulic
valves
Check gauge
glass
Remove and
recondition safety
valves
Check oil pumps
Check boiler feed
pumps

Record gas
pressure

Check lubricating Check belt


oil levels
drives

Check
condensate
receivers

Record
atomizing
pressure
Check general
boiler/burner
operation

Check flame
scanner
assembly

Check chemical
feed systems

Check packing
glands

Check
lubrication
requirements

Tighten all
electrical
terminals

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Part 3: PM Case Studies


- 13 -

PM Level
Y Level 1
S Level 2
M Level 4
W Level 5

Maintenance levels per boiler


Frequency Maintenance
No. of
duration (hour) workers
Yearly
160
6
6 Monthly
60
3
Monthly
20
2
Weekly
10
2

Spare parts
cost $1000
4
2
1
0.5

Boiler operating conditions: 24 hour/day


Workers operating conditions: 300 day/year & 8 hour/day
Average effort of CM = 250 man-hour per boiler
Average annual CM cost = $ 2000 per boiler
Average CM downtime = 120 hours/year per boiler
Average downtime cost rate = $ 1000 per day
Labor cost rate = $ 10 per man-day
Overhead cost = 25 % direct cost (spare parts & labor)

Required:
1. The size of maintenance labor force.
2. Average system availability.
3. Annual PM plan.
4. Annual downtime cost losses.
5. Annual maintenance cost.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Part 3: PM Case Studies


- 14 -

P5: The yearly PM programs information for some


machines in a company are as follows:
M/c
Type

Number
of M/C

Turning
Grinding
M/c
Type
Turning
Grinding

6
3

Maintenance level for each machine


Weekly
Monthly
Yearly
Man
Hour Man
Hour Man
Hour
3
3
5
24
2
3
4
12
-

Maintenance Spare Parts Cost for each machine


Weekly level
Monthly level
Yearly level
400
3000
500
1600
-

(Maint. working conditions: 52 week/year, 6 day/week, 8 hr/day)

Required:
1. The size of PM labor force.
2. Annual PM cost.
3. Annual PM plan.
4. Average down time per month.
5. Average system availability.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Part 3: PM Case Studies


- 15 -

P6: The yearly Reliability and PM programs information for


some machines in a company are as follows:
T

0.95

0.9

0.95

0.9

0.8

0.8

G
0.9

M/c
Type

Number
Maintenance level
of
10 days
6 Monthly
Yearly
M/cs
W D O
W
D
O
W
D
Lath
4
3 1 10
4
2
20
5
4
Drilling
2
2 1 10
4
2
20
Grinding 1
3
2
20
3
3
W: Number of workers D: Maint. duration (day) O: Oil (liter)
- Working conditions:
Operating: 52 week/year, 6 day/week, two shifts
Manpower: 45 week/year, 6 day/week, one shift

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Part 3: PM Case Studies


- 16 -

O
20
20

Annual CM analysis per


machine
Average Manpower (workers)
Average oil quantity (liter)
Average Spar parts costs ($/year)
Average Down time (day/year)

Lath
2
100
2000
20

Drilling Grinding
2
60
1000
12

2
80
1000
10

- Oil cost is $ 5 /liter


- Average labor rate is $ 10 / man-hour
- Average Indirect costs (or Overhead) are 40 % direct
maintenance cost
- Average down time cost rate of the PM is $ 100 / machinehour, whereas that of CM is $ 300 / machine-hour.
Required:
1. The size of maintenance labor force.
2. Annual oil quantity.
3. Annual maintenance budget.
4. Annual maintenance plan with the best manpower
profile.
5. Annual down time for each machine.
6. Average availability for each machine.
7. Annual down time cost for each type.
8. System availability.
9. System reliability.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Part 3: PM Case Studies


- 17 -

P7: The yearly PM programs information for a production


line in a shop are as follows:
T

T
T

Standby

Standby

M/c
Type

Number
of
machines
Turning
3
Milling
2
Drilling
1
Grinding
1
M/c Type
Turning
Milling
Drilling
Grinding

PM Maintenance levels per machine


10 days
6 Monthly
Yearly
Man Day Man day Man day
3
1
4
2
5
4
2
1
4
3
2
1
4
2
3
2
3
3

PM Spar parts and materials cost (L.E.)


10 days
6 Monthly
Yearly
400
1500
3000
600
4000
500
1600
1000
2000

- Working conditions:
Production & maintenance 52 week/year, 6 day/week, two
shifts.
Manpower 45 week/year, 6 day/week, one shift.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Part 3: PM Case Studies
- 18 -

- Average labor rate is 10 L.E./ man-hour


- Average other costs are 40 % direct maintenance cost
- Average CM Spare parts costs are 15 % PM spar parts
costs.
- Average CM manpower are 30 % PM manpower.
- Average down time cost rate is 100 L.E./machine-hour.
- Average CM down times per machine (day /year) are as
follows:
Machine
Turning Milling
Down time
15
10

Drilling
12

Grinding
8

Required:
1. The size of maintenance labor force.
2. Annual maintenance cost.
3. Annual maintenance plan with the best manpower
profile.
4. Average down time for each machine type.
5. Average availability for each machine type.
6. Average system availability
7. Average down time cost for each machine type.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Part 3: PM Case Studies


- 19 -

MAINTENANCE FORECASTING
Y=a+bX
Sum Y = n . a + b Sum X ,

Sum XY = a Sum X + b Sum X2

Measuring the accuracy of forecasting:


1- Coefficient of correlation
r =( n Sum XY - Sum X Sum Y) /
( n Sum X2 (Sum X) 2 ) 0.5 ( n Sum Y2 (Sum Y) 2 ) 0.5
2- Mean Absolute Deviation
MAD = sum | A F | / (n -1)
3- Mean Squared Error
MSE = sum (A F)2 / (n -1)
Controlling the forecast:
CLs = 0 Z S
0

S = Standard deviation of the distribution of errors


= MSE
Z=3
Z=2
Z=1

99.7% of the values can be expected.


95.5% of the values can be expected.
68.5% of the values can be expected.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Part 3: PM Case Studies


- 20 -

P8: Maintenance spare parts cost ($):


Year
1999

Year
2000

Year
2001

Year
2002

Exp.
2003

1450

1300

1200

1000

3
1200
3600

4
1000
4000

X
Y
XY

1
1450
1450

2
1300
2600

n=4
Sum X = 10
Sum Y = 4950

Forecasting
limits
2003
?
5
?

Sum X2 = 30
Sum XY = 11650

Sum Y = n . a + b Sum X ,

Sum XY = a Sum X + b Sum X2

4950 = 4 a + 10 b

11650 = 10 a + 30 b
14850 = 12 a + 30 b

a = 1600

b = - 145

Y = 1600 145 X
X
A
F
(A-F)
(A-F)2

Y5 = 1600 145 (5) = 875


1
1450
1445
5
25

2
1300
1310
10
100

3
1200
1165
35
1225

4
1000
1020
20
400

5
875

MSE = 1750 / (4 -1) = 583


S = 24
Z=2

CLs = 0 Z S = 0 48
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Part 3: PM Case Studies
- 21 -

P9:
An casting company has the following yearly production and
overhead cost data:
Year
Production
quantity
(1000 ton)
Maintenance
cost (M L.E.)

96
5.2

97
5.5

98 99
6.0 6.4

00
6.5

01
7.0

02
7.5

03
7.9

1.3

1.5

1.8 2.0

2.1

2.2

2.5

3.0

Required:
1)

Plot the maintenance cost vs. production quantities?

2)

Estimate and plot a trend for the maintenance cost and


production quantities?

3)

Compute the maintenance cost forecast for year 2004, if the


production plan is 8,500 tons?

4)

Find the unit maintenance fixed cost and unit maintenance


variable cost, for the year 2003?

5)

Measure and discuss the accuracy of the maintenance cost


forecasts using both the correlation coefficient and mean
absolute deviation?

6)

Develop and discuss a forecasting control chart with 99.7%


and 95.5% confidence levels (probability of expected
values)?

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Part 3: PM Case Studies


- 22 -

P10:
Uncertain spare parts cost
Spare parts cost

Probability

$ 100,000
9
10
11
12
13

%
20
50
20
7
3

Estimate the spare parts budget based on the following:


1- Average method ($ 1,100,000)
2- Probability method ($ 1,023,000)
3- PERT method ($ 1,033,000)

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Part 3: PM Case Studies


- 23 -

MONTHLY M. PLANNING USING CPM

P11: The monthly PM programs information for a


machining shop are as follows:
Machine
Code
Machine
Description
Predecessors
Duration
(day)
Worker/day
Spare Parts
cost $ 1000

T01

D01

M01

T02

M02

Turning Drilling Milling Turning Milling


8

T01
8

M01
20

5
5

8
4

7
3

5
6

5
12

Required:
1. If the maximum worker limit is 12 worker/day,
construct the corresponding monthly maintenance
plan.
2. Calculate the monthly spare parts cost.
3. Construct the monthly spare parts cost profile.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Part 3: PM Case Studies


- 24 -

P12: The monthly PM programs information for a


machining shop are as follows:
Machine
T01
D01
M01
T02
D02
M02 M03
Code
Turning Drilling Milling Turning Drilling Milling Milling
Machine
Description
Predecessor
T01
D01
M01
M02
Duration
8
4
6
8
5
8
12
(day)
Worker/day
5
6
7
5
6
5
5
Spare Parts
2
1.5
3
4
2
4
5
cost $ 1000

Required:
1. If the maximum worker limit is 12 worker/day,
construct the corresponding monthly
maintenance plan.
2. Calculate the monthly spare parts cost.
3. Construct the monthly spare parts cost profile.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Part 3: PM Case Studies


- 25 -

CAPITAL MAINTENANCE (OVERHAUL) PLANNING


USING CPM

P13: A Bus company has about 1500 bus. The capital maintenance
and engine overhaul is carrying out after about 250,000 to 300,000
km (about two years) and its duration is about 10 day. The overhaul
information for each bus engine are as follows:
Activity ID
Predecessors
Duration (day)
Worker/day

A
2
4

B
1
2

C
1
3

D
1
2

E
B&D
2
4

F
C
1
3

G
F
2
1

Average spare parts cost = 10,000 L.E./Bus.


Average labor cost rate = 20 L.E./man-day
Indirect cost rate = 50 L.E./day
Down time cost rate = 300 L.E./Bus-day
Required:
1. Construct the bus overhaul plan, If the maximum
worker limit for each overhaul is 6 worker/day.
2. Construct the Annual maintenance plan for all
buses.
3. Calculate the size of maintenance labor force.
4. Comparison between the current and developed
maintenance planning systems.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Part 3: PM Case Studies


- 26 -

H
E&G
2
1

P14: Monthly Maintenance Plan for Wire Production Line


9

W01

W02

Project Name : MMPW


Planning unit : Day

W03

Project start: 1 Jan. 2004


6 DAYS /WEEK

1- Activity List
ID

Activity
1
2
3

Preparation
PRP
Mech. maintenance # 01 MM1
Elec. maintenance # 01 EM1

4
5
6
7
8

Mech. maintenance # 02
Elec. maintenance # 02
Mech. maintenance # 03
Elec. maintenance # 03
Setup

MM2
EM2
MM3
EM3
STP

Duration
Predece
(day)
ssors
2
7
PRP
9
M
M
1
6
PRP
8
MM2
5
PRP
7
MM3
1
EM1
EM2
EM3

Relations
(SS, FS,
FF, and SF)
SS 3
SS 2
SS 2
-

2- Resource List
Resource
Code
L01
L02
SPS

Resources description

Unit

Mechanical worker
Electrical worker
Spare parts & supplies

md
md
cost

Limits/day
Norm. Max.
3
6
4
8
-

Price
LE/unit
40
60
1000

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Part 3: PM Case Studies


- 27 -

3- Resource Allocation
ID

Activity
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

Preparation
PRP
Mech. maintenance # 01 MM1
Elec. maintenance # 01
EM1
Mech. maintenance # 02 MM2
Elec. maintenance # 02
EM2
Mech. maintenance # 03 MM3
Elec. maintenance # 03
EM3
Setup
STP

L01/
day
2
4
3
2
2

Resource
L02/
SPS
day
(Total)
1
1
3
5
4
2
4
3
2
3
3
2
1

4- Base Calendar (Working periods)


Saturday Sunday

Monday

Tuesday

Wednesday

Thursday

X
1/01/04

Friday

Holidays: 20 to 21 Jan. 2004

Required:
1. Draw the project network (logic diagram)?
2. Draw the corresponding Gantt chart?
3. Construct the corresponding smoothed worker
loading?
4. Construct the corresponding worker leveling?
5. Construct the target action plan?.
6. Construct the cost profile & S-curve?
7. Construct the target master plan?

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Part 3: PM Case Studies


- 28 -

P15: Annual Maintenance Plan for AUC-IT Labs.


Project Name : AMIT
Planning unit : Day

Project start: 1 Jan. 2004


6 DAYS /WEEK

1- Activity List
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9

Activity
Preparation
Server maintenance
Hardware maintenance
Lab #01
Software maintenance
Lab #01
Hardware maintenance
Lab #02
Software maintenance
Lab #02
Hardware maintenance
Lab #03
Software maintenance
Lab #03
Setup

PRP
SRM
HM1

Duration
(day)
1
3
4

Predece Relations
ssors
PRP
SRM
-

SM1

HM1

SS 2

HM2

SRM

SM2

HM2

SS 1

HM3

SRM

SM3

HM3

SS 1

STP

SM1
SM2
SM3

ID

2- Resource List
Resource
Code
L01
L02
SPS

Resources description

Unit

Hardware Engineer
Software Engineer
Spare parts & supplies

md
md
cost

Limits/day
Norm. Max.
3
6
4
8
-

Price
LE/unit
120
100
1000

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Part 3: PM Case Studies


- 29 -

3- Resource Allocation
ID

Activity
1
2
3

Preparation
Server maintenance
Hardware maintenance
Lab #01
Software maintenance
Lab #01
Hardware maintenance
Lab #02
Software maintenance
Lab #02
Hardware maintenance
Lab #03
Software maintenance
Lab #03
Setup

4
5
6
7
8
9

Resource
L02/
SPS
day
(Total)
1
1
1
1
2

PRP
SRM
HM1

L01/
day
2
1
4

SM1

HM2

SM2

HM3

SM3

STP

4- Base Calendar (Working periods)


Saturday

Sunday

Monday

Tuesday

Wednesday

Thursday

Friday

X
X
X
X 1/01/04
Holidays: 20 to 21 Jan. 2004

Required:
1. Draw the project network (logic diagram)?
2. Draw the corresponding Gantt chart?
3. Construct the corresponding smoothed worker loading?
4. Construct the corresponding worker leveling?
5. Construct the target action plan?.
6. Construct the cost profile & S-curve?
7. Construct the target master plan?
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Part 3: PM Case Studies
- 30 -

MATERIALS REQUIREMENTS PLANNING (MRP)


FOR MAINTENANCE

P16:A monthly maintenance plan for 50 similar equipment


to replace the gear box for these equipment. The gear box
structure is shown below.

A
B(2)
D(2)

C(2)
E(2)

E(2)

F(2)
G(1)

Component
Lead time (week)
On-Hand

A
1
10

B
2
15

D(2)
C
1
20

D
1
10

E
2
10

F
3
5

Required:
1. Time-phased for the gear box structure
2. Gross requirements plan for 50 gear box
3. Net material requirements plan for 50 gear box.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Part 3: PM Case Studies


- 31 -

G
2
0

CM CAPACITY PLANNING USING WAITING LINES


MODELS

P17: A maintenance service facility has Poisson arrival


rates, negative exponential service times, and operates on a
first-come first-served queue discipline. Breakdowns occur
on an average of = three per day with a range of zero to
eight. The maintenance crew can service an average of =
six machines per day with a range of from zero to seven.
Find the following:
1) Utilization factor of the service facility.
2) Percent idle time % I
3) Mean time in the system Ts
4) Mean number in the system Ns
5) Mean Waiting time Tw
6) Mean number in the queue Nq
7) Probability of finding n=2 machines in the system
8) Probability of finding n=4 machines in the system
9) Probability of finding n=6 machines in the system

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Part 3: PM Case Studies


- 32 -

Solution
Mean arrival
rate
= 3, {0,8}

Maintenance
service
facility

Mean service
rate
= 6, {0,7}

1) Utilization factor of the service facility =


= Mean arrival rate / Mean service rate
= / = 3 / 6 = 50 %
2) Percent idle time % I =
% I = (Total) - (Utilization factor)
= 100 50 = 50 %
3) Mean time in the system Ts =
Ts = 1 / (Mean service rate Mean arrival rate)
= 1 / ( - ) = 1 / (6 3) = 1/3 day
4) Mean number in the system Ns =
Ns = (Mean time in system) (Mean arrival rate)
= / ( - )= 3 / (6 3) = 1 machine
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Part 3: PM Case Studies
- 33 -

5) Mean Waiting time Tw


Tw = Total time in system Service time
= {1/( - )} { 1/ }
= {1/(6 - 3)} { 1/6 } = 1/6 day
6) Mean number in the queue Nq =
= (Mean number in system)-(Mean number being served)
= { / ( - )} {/}
= {3 / (6 3)} - {3/6} = 1/2 machine
7) Probability of finding n=2 machines in the system
Pn = (1 - /) (/)n = (1 - 3/6) (3/6)2 = 0.125
8) Probability of finding n=4 machines in the system
Pn = (1 - /) (/)n = (1 - 3/6) (3/6)4 = 0.03125
9) Probability of finding n=6 machines in the system
Pn = (1 - /) (/)n = (1 - 3/6) (3/6)6 = 0.0078

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Part 3: PM Case Studies


- 34 -

P18: A maintenance service facility has Poisson arrival


rates, negative exponential service times, and operates on a
first-come first-served queue discipline. Breakdowns occur
on an average of = five per day with a range of zero to
nine. The maintenance crew can service an average of =
six machines per day with a range of from zero to eight.
Find the following:
1. Utilization factor of the service facility.
2. Percent idle time % I
3. Mean time in the system Ts
4. Mean number in the system Ns
5. Mean Waiting time Tw
6. Mean number in the queue Nq
7. Probability of finding n=2 machines in the system
8. Probability of finding n=4 machines in the system
9. Probability of finding n=6 machines in the
system

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Part 3: PM Case Studies


- 35 -

P19:
The CM information for a production department are as
follows:
1. Labor maintenance cost rate = $10/hr
2. Downtime cost rate = $50/hr per machine.
3. The mean number of failures is four/hr, and distributed
according to a Poisson distribution.
4. The mean number of repairs is six repairs per workerhour, and distributed exponentially
What is the best maintenance crew size?

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Part 3: PM Case Studies


- 36 -

Solution
Mean arrival rate
= 4, Poisson

Mean service rate


Maintenance
service
facility

Labor cost =
$10/hr

= 6 /worker,
Exp.
Crew Size?

Downtime cost =
$50/hr/machine

Crew

Size
1
2
3
4
5

6
12
18
24
30

Ns =

Labor

Downtime

Total

/ ( - )

cost

cost

cost

2.00
0.50
0.29
0.20
0.15

$/hr
10
20
30
40
50

$/hr
100.00
25.00
14.29
10.00
7.69

$/hr
110
45
44.29
50.00
57.69

The best maintenance crew size is 3 workers

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Part 3: PM Case Studies


- 37 -

P20:
The CM information for a production department are as
follows:
5. Labor maintenance cost rate = $20/hr
6. Downtime cost rate = $150/hr per machine.
7. The mean number of failures is five/hr, and distributed
according to a Poisson distribution.
8. The mean number of repairs is five repairs per workerhour, and distributed exponentially
What is the best maintenance crew size?

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Part 3: PM Case Studies


- 38 -

P21:
The CM information for a production department is as
follows:
Labor maintenance cost rate = $20/hr
Downtime cost rate = $150/hr per machine.
The mean number of failures is five/hr, and distributed
according to a Poisson distribution.
The mean number of repairs is five repairs per worker-hour,
and distributed exponentially
Required:
1. Determine the best maintenance crew size?
2. Calculate the utilization factor of the maintenance
crew?
3. Determine the mean time in the system?
4. Calculate the probability of finding two machines in the
system?

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Part 3: PM Case Studies


- 39 -

P22:
A factory has 200 machines and the maintenance
engineer supervises the repair crews who repair
malfunctioning machines. The maintenance policy is to
repair the broken down machine and bring back in
production within 2 hours on the average. If average
breakdown rate is 3.5 machines/hour and each repair
crew can repair 0.25 machine per hour on the average.
How many repair crews are required ?
The formula for average repair rate () is
1
ts = ---------or
-
Where = repair rate

= + 1/ ts

= arrival rate of malfunctioning machines


ts = average time arrivals in the system
Required average repair rate
= 3.5 + 1 / 2 = 4 machines / hour
No. of Crews =
machines/hour a crew can repair
=
4 0.25 = 16 repair crews required
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Part 3: PM Case Studies
- 40 -

MAINTENANCE WORK CONTROL USING


CONTROL CHARTS

P23: The weekly backlog data for the mechanical section of


the maintenance department are given as follows in terms of
labor-hours for the last four months:
Number
1

Month
March

Week 1
360

Week 2
320

Week 3
300

Week 4
380

April

340

350

320

380

May

420

412

452

380

June

390

370

350

410

Determine and plot the control chart for the weekly backlog.
(For n = 4, d2 = 2.059.)

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Part 3: PM Case Studies


- 41 -

SPARE PARTS COST CONTROL

P24: The monthly plan and the actual maintenance spare


parts in ABC Company are as follows:
Spare
part #
A11
A12
A13
A14
A15

Plan (Jan. 2001)


Planned
Standard
quantity
cost
(unit)
(L.E./unit)
40
1000
30
1200
50
900
20
850
20
950

Actual (Jan. 2001)


Actual
Actual cost
quantity
(L.E./unit)
(unit)
40
1100
20
1200
40
1000
10
800
20
900

Based on these data, determine the different performance


indicators.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Part 3: PM Case Studies


- 42 -

TOTAL MAINTENANCE CONTROL


P25:
Monthly production information on Foundry Shop FS510 was as
follows:
Item
January February
2004
2004
Working days
31
28
8
8
Standard production rate (ton/hr)
24
24
Average daily time (hr/day)
Average down time (hr/day)
6
4
Average standby (hr/day)
3
3
Average target quantity (ton/day)
120
136
Average actual quantity (ton/day)
80
105
Average sound quantity (ton/day)
70
98
Average defect quantity (ton/day)
10
7
Average energy consumption (1000 kwh/day)
49
67
130
Material cost (1000 L.E/day)
100
Required:
1. Equipment avaliability.
2. Equipment performance efficiency.
3. Equipment utilization factor.
4. Equipment quality rate
5. Equipment uptime ratio.
6. Energy productivity.
7. Material productivity
8. Overall equipment effectiveness (OEE).
9. Total effective equipment productivity (TEEP).
10. Net equipment effectiveness (NEE).

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Part 3: PM Case Studies


- 43 -

Basic data
Item
January
February
2004
2004
Production rate (ton/hr)
8
8
Total time (hr/day)

24

Average down time


6
(hr/day)
Average available time
18
(hr)
Average standby
3
(hr/day)
Average used time
15
(hr/day)
Average target quantity
120
(ton/day)
Average actual quantity
80
(ton/day)
Average sound quantity
70
(ton/day)
Average defect quantity
10
(ton/day)
(14%)
Energy productivity
700
(kwh/ton)
Material productivity
1429
(1000 L.E/ton)

Feb. / Jan.
100 %

24

100 %

67 %

20

111 %

100 %

17

113 %

136

113 %

105

125 %

98

129 %

7
(7%)
684

64 %

1326

98 %
92 %

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Part 3: PM Case Studies


- 44 -

Performance Evaluation
Indicator
January
2004
Availability
18/24= 75 %

February
2004
20/24= 83 %

Feb. / Jan.
111 %

Performance
efficiency
Quality rate

80/120= 67 %

105/136= 77 %

115 %

70/80= 88 %

98/105= 93 %

106 %

Utilization ratio

15/18= 83 %

17/20= 85 %

102 %

Uptime (hr/day)

70/8= 8.75

98/8= 12.25

140 %

Uptime ratio

8.75/15= 49%

12.25/17=72 %

147 %

OEE

44 %

60 %

136 %

TEEP

37 %

51 %

138 %

NEE

29 %

52 %

179 %

700

684

98 %

1326

92 %

Energy
productivity
(kwh/ton)
Material
productivity (1000
L.E/ton)

1429

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Part 3: PM Case Studies


- 45 -

P26:
The six-monthly maintenance costs ($1000) for a
productive system are as follows:
Target Costs:
Jan

Feb

Month #
Mar Apr May

100
50

100
50

100
50

100
50

100
50

100
50

100
50

200
150
300

200
150
300

200
150
300

200
150
300

200
150
300

200
150
300

200
150
300

Feb

Month #
Mar Apr May

Jun

Jly

23
32

38
65

49
96

56
94

68
94

65
90

54
72

231
503
407

213
370
397

181
293
320

185
164
290

199
201
330

196
193
320

157
142
362

Cost item
PM Cost:
Spar parts
Labor
CM Cost:
Spar parts
Labor
DT Cost

Jun

Jly

Actual Costs:
Cost item
PM Cost:
Spar parts
Labor
CM Cost:
Spar parts
Labor
DT Cost

Jan

Based on these data, determine the different performance


evaluation indicators for the maintenance system.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Part 3: PM Case Studies


- 46 -

Target:
Cost item
PM Cost
CM Cost
TM Cost
DT Cost
TM+DT
PM/TM
CM/PM

Jan
150
350
800
300
1100
0.14
2.33

Feb
150
350
800
300
1100
0.14
2.33

Mar
150
350
800
300
1100
0.14
2.33

Month #
Apr May
150 150
350 350
800 800
300 300
1100 1100
0.14 0.14
2.33 2.33

Jun
150
350
800
300
1100
0.14
2.33

Jly Total
150 1050
350 2450
800 5600
300 2100
1100 7700
0.14 0.955
2.33 16.33

Actual:
Cost item
PM Cost
CM Cost
TM Cost
DT Cost
TM+DT
PM/TM
CM/PM

Jan Feb Mar


55
103 145
734
583 474
1196 1083 939
407
397 320
1603 1480 1259
0.05 0.10 0.15
13.35 5.66 3.27

Month #
Apr May
150 162
349 400
789 892
290 330
1079 1222
0.19 0.18
2.33 2.47

Jun
155
369
864
320
1184
0.18
2.38

Jly Total
126
896
299 3208
787 6550
362 2426
1149 8976
0.16 1.007
2.37 31.82

Change %:
Cost item

Jan

Month #
Feb Mar Apr May Jun

Jly

Total

PM Cost
CM Cost
TM Cost
DT Cost
TM+DT
PM/TM
CM/PM

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Part 3: PM Case Studies


- 47 -

P27:
The yearly PM programs information for six similar gas
turbines in a power station are as follows:

Target work performed:


Item
Total labor force (worker)
Annual spare parts cost ($1000)
Annual labor cost ($1000)
Overhead cost ($1000)
Average down time
(day/year per gas turbine)

PM
18
264
--51

CM
7
72
--15

Total
25
336
75
514
66

Average downtime cost rate = $ 1000 per day

Actual work performed:


Item
Total labor force (worker)
Annual spare parts cost ($1000)
Annual labor cost ($1000)
Overhead cost ($1000)
Average down time
(day/year per gas turbine)

PM
20
300
--45

CM
10
100
--5

Total
30
400
80
520
50

Based on these data, determine the different performance


evaluation indicators for the maintenance system.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Part 3: PM Case Studies


- 48 -

Performance Evaluation Sheet:


Item

Target

Actual

Total labor force (worker)


Annual s. parts cost

25
336

30
400

Change
%
+ 20
+ 19

($1000)
Annual labor cost ($1000)
Overhead cost ($1000)
Total m. cost ($1000)
Average down time
Down time cost ($1000)

75
514
925
66
66

80
520
1000
50
50

+ 6.6
+ 1.2
+ 8.1
- 24.3
- 24.3

991
81.9
7/18 =
38.9
72/264 =
27.3
514/411=
1.25

1050
86.3
10/20 =
50
100/300 =
33.3
520/480=
1.08

+ 6.0
+ 5.3
+ 28.5

25/6=
4.17

30/6=
5.00

- 16.6

TMC + DTC
Availability %
CM/PM % (labor force)
CM/PM % (Spare parts)
Overhead %

Labor productivity %
(worker/gas turbine)

+ 22.0
- 13.6

P28:
The six-monthly maintenance costs ($1000) for a productive
system are as follows:
Target Costs:
Cost item

Month #

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Part 3: PM Case Studies


- 49 -

PM Cost:
Spar parts
Labor
CM Cost:
Spar parts
Labor
DT Cost

100
50

100
50

100
50

100
50

100
50

100
50

100
50

200
150
300

200
150
300

200
150
300

200
150
300

200
150
300

200
150
300

200
150
300

Actual Costs:
Cost item
PM Cost:
Spar parts
Labor
CM Cost:
Spar parts
Labor
DT Cost

Jan

Feb

Month #
Mar
Apr May

Jun

Jly

23
32

38
65

49
96

56
94

68
94

65
90

54
72

231
503
407

213
370
397

181
293
320

185
164
290

199
201
330

196
193
320

157
142
362

Based on these data, determine the different performance


evaluation indicators for the maintenance system.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Part 3: PM Case Studies


- 50 -

Target:
Cost item
Jan

PM Cost
CM Cost
DT Cost
TM Cost

150
350
300
800

Feb

150
350
300
800

Month #
Mar Apr May

150
350
300
800

150
350
300
800

150
350
300
800

Jun

Jly

150
350
300
800

150
350
300
800

Jun

Jly

155
369
320
864

126
299
362
787

Actual:
Cost item

Jan

PM Cost
55
CM Cost
734
DT Cost
407
TM Cost 1196

Feb

103
583
397
1083

Month #
Mar Apr May

145
474
320
939

150
349
290
789

162
400
330
892

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Part 3: PM Case Studies


- 51 -

P29: The monthly budget and the actual maintenance cost


for XXX Company are as follows:
Cost item
Spare parts
Direct labor
Indirect materials
Indirect labor
Fixed overhead

Standard
Quantity
Rate
20,00
6000
ton
40,000

L.E.
15

hour
L.E.
150,000 L.E.
100,000 L.E.
300,000 L.E.

Actual
Quantity
Rate
15,00
6400
ton
45,000

L.E.
18

hour
L.E.
180,000 L.E.
80,000 L.E.
350,000 L.E.

Based on these data, determine the different performance


indicators.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Part 3: PM Case Studies


- 52 -

P30:
The annual budget and the actual maintenance cost for XXX
production department are as follows:

Cost item (L.E.)


Direct labor
Indirect labor
Spare parts
Indirect materials
Other overheads

Budget
Current Year to

Actual
Current
Year to

month
6000
5936
2000
1000
1000

month
5000
4111
700
500
1200

date
60000
53834
12000
10000
10000

date
65000
58834
10000
5000
12000

Based on these data, determine the different performance


indicators.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Part 3: PM Case Studies


- 53 -

P31:
Maintenance Planning for Spare Parts Work Shop
1- Equipment List
Plant
Systems
Productive
systems

Supportive
systems

Location
Machining
shop

Equipment Type
Turning
Milling
Drilling
Grinding
Press
Induction furnaces
Molding machines
Arc Welding

Foundry
shop
Welding
shop
Material
Fork lift
handling
Air room
Compressor
Water room Pump 50 HP
Pump 100 HP
Power
Diesel generator
room

Number of
Machines
4
2
2
2
1
2
5
1
4
2
2
2
2

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Part 3: PM Case Studies


- 54 -

2- Layout of machining shop


T

3- Equipment reliability
T

0.9

0.9

0.8

0.8

0.9

0.9

0.9

0.8

0.8

0.9

4- Equipment PM Program for machining shop


4-1- PM Manpower & Downtime:
Eq. Type

Weekly
Man Hr
Turning
2
5
Milling
2
5
Drilling
1
3
Grinding
2
3
Press
1
2

Monthly
Man Hr
3
16
3
12
-

6 Monthly
Yearly
Man Hr
Man Hr
5
24
5
16
2
10
3
12
3
12
3
16
2
6
3
12

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Part 3: PM Case Studies


- 55 -

4-2- PM Spare Parts & Supplies:


Eq. Type

Weekly
B
O
Turning
3
Milling
2
Drilling
1
Grinding
1
Press
1
B : Bearing
4-3- PM Cost:

Monthly
6 Monthly
B
O
B
O
5
4
4
6
4
8
4
6
O: Oil (liter)

Yearly
B
O
4
12
4
10
4
8
4
8
4
8

Average labor rate $ 10 / hour


Spare Parts & Supplies cost:
Bearing $ 50 /unit
&

Oil $ 5 /liter

Other costs (Indirect or Overhead) 40 % PM


5- Failure Analysis for the last year (CM)
Average per
Turning Milling Drilling Grinding Press
equipment
Man-hour
100
60
40
50
30
Down time hr
50
40
30
40
30
Spare parts cost 1000
800
500
600
500
$
Oil (liter)
20
15
12
16
10
6- Working conditions:
Machine Working conditions:
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Part 3: PM Case Studies
- 56 -

2 shifts/day, 8 hr./shift, 6 day/week, 45


week/year.
Manpower working conditions:
8 hr./day, 6 day/week, 45 week/year.
II- Maintenance Planning Elements
Required:
1. Equipment coding.
2. Equipment priorities.
3. Maintenance labor force.
4. Spare parts & supplies requirement planning.
5. Annual maintenance cost.
6. Equipment average down time per month.
7. Equipment average time availability.
8. System average down time per month.
9. System average time availability
10. System reliability
11. Annual PM plans.
12. Annual man-hours & manpower profile
13. Monthly PM plans.
14. Maintenance Work orders
----------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Part 3: PM Case Studies


- 57 -

You might also like