Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Individual Name: ASHLEY B WOLCOTT Student Number: 000444306 Institution: Program Type: Test Date: # of Questions: Northwest U WA BSN 11/22/2013 50 Adjusted Individual Total Score: ATI Proficiency Level: Mean - National: Mean - Program: Percentile Rank - National: Percentile Rank - Program: 74.0% Level 2 65.5% 86
NOTE: Means and percentile ranks are not presented for sub-scales with fewer than five items.
Please see page 4 for an explanation of the Scores and Topics to Review sections
Page 1 of 4 REP_COMP_3_0_IndividualProctored_3_0
Topics To Review
Management of Care (20 items)
Advocacy (1 item) Overview of Community Health Nursing: Advocating for the Homeless (RM CH RN 5.0 Chp 1, Basic Concept) Case Management (3 items) Practice Settings and Aggregates: Therapeutic Communication Techniques of the Parish Nurse (RM CH RN 5.0 Chp 4, Therapeutic Procedure) Collaboration with Interdisciplinary Team (2 items) Overview of Community Health Nursing: Epidemiological Approach (RM CH RN 5.0 Chp 1, Basic Concept) Concepts of Management (3 items) Practice Settings and Aggregates: Occupational Health and Primary Prevention (RM CH RN 5.0 Chp 4, Basic Concept) Establishing Priorities (3 items) Communicable Diseases, Disasters, and Bioterrorism: Disaster Triage (RM CH RN 5.0 Chp 6, Basic Concept) Referrals (1 item) Practice Settings and Aggregates: Roles of the Faith Community Nurse (RM CH RN 5.0 Chp 4, Basic Concept)
Please see page 4 for an explanation of the Scores and Topics to Review sections
Page 2 of 4 REP_COMP_3_0_IndividualProctored_3_0
Outcomes
No of Individual Score 66.7% 75.6% Description
Ability to recall and comprehend information and concepts foundational to quality nursing practice. Ability to use critical thinking skills (interpretation, analysis, evaluation, inference, and explanation) to make a clinical judgment regarding a posed clinical problem. Includes cognitive abilities of application and analysis.
Thinking Skills
Foundational Thinking in Nursing (RN 2010) Clinical Judgment/Critical Thinking in Nursing (RN 2010)
Items 9 41
No of
Priority Setting
Items 9
No of
Nursing Process
Assessment (RN 2010)
Items 10
12
75.0%
13
69.2%
11
72.7%
100.0%
Please see page 4 for an explanation of the Scores and Topics to Review sections
Page 3 of 4 REP_COMP_3_0_IndividualProctored_3_0
Norm-Referenced Measures:
Means and percentile ranks can be useful for comparing performance to other nursing students, both nationally and within the same RN program type. These means and percentile ranks are initially set on a volunteer norming sample. They are reviewed annually, and may be periodically reset as more students take the assessments.
Individual scores can be interpreted through criterionreferenced or norm-referenced measures. Criterionreferenced measures are best used to determine if an established standard has been met. Norm-referenced measures can be useful for comparing performance to other students.
Mean - National:
The national mean is the average of the individual scores of all test takers (within a specified sample from the ATI data pool) for this assessment. The national mean includes all RN program types.
Mean - Program:
The program mean is the average of the individual scores of all test takers of your RN program type (within a specified sample from the ATI data pool) for this assessment.
NA: Data not available Pretest Items: There are 5 unscored pretest questions
throughout the assessment, and 50 scored questions. The pretest questions are used for research purposes.
Topics to Review:
Based on the questions missed on this assessment, a listing of content areas and topics to review is provided. A variety of learning resources may be used in the review process, including content, images, animations and videos in select components of ATIs Content Mastery Series Review Modules, and online practice assessments.