Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Image of FILIPINO
FORM LANGUAGE
GRACE N. NALDA
Bachelor of Science in Architecture
University of the Philippines College of Architecture
1.1 General Field of Study
After centuries of colonization, the Philippines is declared to be a free country for more than a century
now. Yet, it seems that our colonizers have left footprints that have some bearing on view of
architecture in the Philippines. Technology in mass media and construction has severed its ambiguity.
Our architecture slowly morphs to join a homogeneous field of globalization risking our cultural
identity. This is sourced out of the many international-styled buildings that we see in leading cities
whether in Luzon, Visayas, or Mindanao. While people favor trends in globalization, there are a few
researchers who brave themselves demystifying this Filipino character. Some have already argued its
demise and some, even its nonexistence. This again is something worth exploring.
The National Symposium on Filipino Architecture and Design (NSFAD) contributes knowledge that
may lead us to understand our very own architecture, through research. Some of its proponents draw
conclusions that Filipino architecture is found in space though no particular language through form
was illustrated.
The lack or loss of definite form language of Filipino architecture is the subject to be dealt with. In the
belief that our architecture goes beyond the materials being used and its spatial embodiment in the
built environment, the goal of this study is to inflame awareness on the possibility of true Filipino
architecture. It seeks recurring architectural features that are perceptive of our culture. It finds out
physical patterns that engage senses hinting again Filipino architecture. It figures out spatial
arrangements that are common in many designs. It searches potential aesthetics that are
recognizably Filipino.
To come up with a more reliable output, the study limits itself to domestic architecture. With the family
being the major shaper of our society, allusion to our culture is easily generated. However, for
reference purposes, minimal citation of non-domestic architecture will take place.
The question of Filipino architecture seems complicated. What with the many culture our history has
encountered, we may only expect various influences. Most Asian countries boast with the
distinctiveness of their architecture. We easily recognize their identity through it. A common example
is the concept of Japanese Zen. Japanese architecture emanate marks of that are unique from other
Asian countries even from its immediate neighbors. This brings us to an effort to know our own. This
study investigates domestic architectural distinctiveness in the local context. Is Filipino architecture
really found only in the boundaries of space? Are there common patterns to aid in strengthening our
claims of our own architecture? Are there traces of our shared idea of space and aesthetics that
distinguish us from foreign architecture? If there are, what are these patterns that create form
language?
buildings will not be able to come alive, unless they are made by all the people in the society,
unless they are made by all the people in the society, and unless these people share a common
pattern languge, within which to make buildings, within which to make these buildings.
With AWARENESS IN ARCHITECTURAL IMAGE of FILIPINOS being the core, the study
encompasses the recurring concept of space and aesthetics of Filipino authors. Image may be known
as a three-dimensional and/or a visual element. In cultural terms, it is a characteristic that ties-in a
group of people with commonalities. It is also dependent on the behavior and activity settings that
may be relative to time. The concept of awareness and image stems from Kevin Lynch s Images of a
City, wherein the idea of districts create an inspirational manner of viewing the problem of the study
easily. This paper aims to uncover possible architectural forms that recur in many local architecture. It
hopes to fortify and promote consciousness on our different culture that may be embodied in designs
authored by Filipinos themselves. With this in mind, our study might be able to guide further studies in
discovering what may have always been with us a Filipino architectural image. To know our own
architecture gives light to our identity. This character is comparable to recognizing our existence.
1.4 Methodology
References pertained to by the Design Class will be collected. References will include past studies
and surveys related to local architecture. It will involve the concept of Pinoy Zen and house
preferences. Relevant pictures or photographs from books will be collected. Observation and
experience of the authors will also be a basis for the study.
After gathering data, analysis will precede. It will dwell heavily on spatial and aesthetic aspect of
domestic architecture. Though this does not mean exclusion of non-domestic architecture. When
necessary, systems of analyzing domestic architecture from previous studies will be used. One
example will be the method of structuration. Consultations will likewise take place. Conclusions will be
derived from the results.
1.5 Hypothesis
In a pattern of spatial configuration, there is usually a common trend through form that can be found
in a particular architecture such as the Japanese zen. If a form language consequently results from a
pattern language, it can be assumed that Filipinos can have their own form language. This can be
true when we are able to prove or show the culture and patterns of the Philippine society. This will
hence be mentioned in the study. After which, when an acceptable level of patterns in space and
aesthetics is collected, form language can be sourced out of it.
1.6 Introduction
Christopher Alexander created hundreds of pattern language in a global context. It is revealed in his
book A Pattern Language . This language is extremely practical. It is a language that we have
distilled from building and planning. It can be used to design houses for oneself, with one s family.
And it can be used as guide in the actual process of construction.
Most of studies on Filipino domestic architecture or architecture in the Philippines dwell on spatial
patterns and configuration. Form language has not been appropriated in many of these researches.
In order to move the pace on views on Filipino architecture, another step is taken by providing a
pattern language that manifests form. These recurring patterns have been frequently observed in
many domestic architecture and it is through these that possible forms can be derived. Such forms in
turn create related patterns that have been observed and are then noted. A union of such hence
generates a potential architecture that is distinctly Filipino.
References that involve views on space are crucial to coming up with form. Since no definite Filipino
form yet has been described in previous references, the author appropriates a form language in the
Filipino context.
Spatial Configuration
Most of the time, Filipinos use an open plan for their house. This
is an indication of both permeability and convertibility of space
due to different interior elements used in between spaces such
as visually penetrable walls that allow conversation of function
both for entertainment and living.
Varying floor heights define Filipino spaces. They are also used
as elements of approach or transition giving an inviting
atmosphere from outside. As for interior spaces, split levels are
usually defined by a few steps (often, three or four) functioning
as invisible walls. This allow for visual and acoustical
accessibility. Such characteristics signify Filipinos favor for
social interaction. This difference in floor level is usually
designed in such a manner that two spaces are not completely
separated by height. This means that varying heights do not
exceed a level by which two people will be deprived of visual
communication. This is probably the reason why most steps
usually are composed of not more than four steps before another
common space is reached assuming an average ceiling height of
2.7 meters.
Split levels have long been a tradition for Filipino houses. The
bahay kubo is elevated by stilts; its function is to provide a silong
to shelter livestock such as chickens. At the same time it helps
control heat and serves as protection from wild animals. Today,
though caring for chickens and keeping from wild animals is no
longer of need, it leaves the purpose of thermal control and
space seggregation. Still, it leaves a mark of Filipino culture.
Accessibility
Elements of Security
Ventilation
While louvers allow for both thermal and lighting control, glass
and new translucent or transparent materials are now being used
as an alternative for lighting and aesthetics. Employment of such
an element though provides a conventional appearance that
assumes Filipino form. This element is often found directly above
doors or windows. Done in a rectangular shape, these light
sources are often found in contemporary houses.
Privacy
Outdoor Laundry
Perhaps, the grounds for this could be the lack of internal space,
unique drainage system, the presence of other people or simply
the pleasure of enjoying sunlight. Still, even the wealthy have
their outdoor laundry in their very own backyard. This could
mean that space is not after all the only reason.
Natural Environment
Movable Furnitures
Religious Images
Making space for these images are vital to spatial hence form
considerations, so that spiritual values of Filipinos are not taken
for granted and are given due significance and attention.
1.8 Summary and Conclusion
Alexander, Christopher. (1977) A Pattern Language: Towns, Buildings, Construction. New York: Oxford
University Press
Klassen, Winand. (1986) Architecture in the Philippines: Filipino Building in a Cross-Cultural Context.
Cebu City: University of San Carlos
Lichauco, Daniel A. (1995) A Comparative Analysis of Western and Philippine Spatial Systems: Towards
the Development of Philippine Architecture . National Symposium on Filipino Architecture And Design.
p3-11