LONDON 

NEW YORK
 AN ADAM PERIOD MARQUETRY COMMODE

An important late 18th century marquetry commode attributed to

Mayhew and Ince, in satinwood crossbanded in tulipwood with running
guilloche and paterae inlay, the top having flowerheads alternating
with leafy swags tied with ribbon bows holding three cupid pendants,
surrounding a central sunburst motif. The central frieze drawer further
inlaid with swags above a single bowed cupboard, flanked by further
doors, each decorated with ribbon-tied swags, anthemion and flower
heads, with guilloche and paterae borders. Raised on square tapering legs
ending in leaf marquetry feet. The converted side cupboard doors each
having a shelf.

England, circa 1775

Dimensions:
Height: 34 in (87 cm)
Length: 48 in (123 cm)
Depth: 20 in (52 cm)

Provenance:
Lady Sarah Cohen, purchased from Partridge, 1963.
By descent to her daughter, the late Irene Kreitman.

F2G0382 (FX079)
 THE ‘GOLDEN AGE’ OF ENGLISH FURNITURE

This marquetry commode represents the peak of neo-classical furniture

design and execution during a period regarded as the ‘Golden Age’ of
English furniture. The cultural elite of the day commissioned highly
refined neo-classical ornament and design. So unanimous was its
acceptance that it became a truly national expression affecting the
work of virtually every English cabinet maker and designer including
the partnership of John Mayhew and William Ince, Robert Adam, Thomas
Sheraton and William Chambers. England had created her own highly
sophisticated domestic style which was emulated even by the French
from whom England traditionally turned to for cultural inspiration.

A commode undoubtedly from the same workshop as the present commode

attributed to Mayhew and Ince, circa 1775, sold by Mallett in 1991 and now in a
private collection. Illustrated in Lanto Synge, Mallett MIllenium, Antique Collectors
Club, London, 1999, page 185.
 THE ATTRIBUTION TO MAYHEW AND INCE

This commode was almost certainly made by the London cabinet

makers John Mayhew and William Ince who ranked the King, the 4th
Duke of Marlborough, the Duke of Manchester, the Earl of Coventry
and the Earl of Kerry among their distinguised aristocratic clients. The
firm was one of the longest lived of any of the major London cabinet
makers of the eighteenth century being partners from 1759 until 1804.
The partnership’s volume of engraved designs, The Universal System of
Household Furniture, published in 1762, was dedicated to the Duke of
Marlborough for whom the firm supplied furniture for Blenheim Palace
in Oxfordshire. The Universal System was published in both English and
French which was perhaps as much a declaration to their British clientele
of their cosmopolitan designs as a serious bid for French patronage.

The decoration on this cabinet relates to Mayhew and Ince’s marquetry

style in the 1770s and 1780s. Stylistic characteristics include the
combination of the flowerhead paterae, husks and ribbon-ties with
antique ornament and putti derived from classical engravings. The
illusion of depth is created by delicate surface pen work engraving
on the exotic inlaid woods that contrast against the pale satinwood
ground.

These decorative elements feature on a marquetry commode attributed

to Mayhew and Ince sold by Mallett in 1991, however the commodes
also share structural similarities. Lucy Wood, the author of the seminal
Catalogue of Commodes viewed the earlier example at Mallett and
related it to two semi-elliptical marquetry commodes attributed to
Mayhew and Ince at the Lady Lever Art Gallery. All feature a wide central
door flanked by two smaller blind panels as did this present example,
similar backboard construction and joinings.
A group of furniture at Badminton has been associated with large payments
made to Mayhew and Ince by the Dowager Duchess of Beaufort between
1778 and 1798 and include two semi-elliptical commodes, a pair of side tables,
a pair of corner cupboards, and a small oval topped table. The Badminton
cabinet has a drawer in the frieze as also seen in this example and very similar
marquetry design to the top where are three medallions hung from ribbon
tied swags.The Badminton commode again has the structural similarity of
blind quandrant spaces either side of the central cupboard.

Two commodes
attributed to
Mayhew and
Ince in The Lady
Lever Collection
illustrated in
The Catalogue
of Commodes by
Lucy Wood, HMSO,
London, 1994,
colour plate 31 and
29.
A detail of the top of the commode at Badminton next to the top of this present example.
Illustrated in The Catalogue of Commodes by Lucy Wood, HMSO, London, 1994, page 232.

The Badminton commode

by Mayhew and Ince
Illustrated in The
Catalogue of Commodes
by Lucy Wood, HMSO,
London, 1994, page 232.
 ROBERT ADAM AND THE NEO-CLASSICAL REVIVAL

Robert Adam relied heavily on the designs and ornament of Ancient Rome in
his publications of designs, Works in Architecture of Robert and James Adam
in 1773-78 and 1779. Adam’s engravings fuelled a craze for Roman classical
grandeur and order and marked a return to classic restraint and a greater
delicacy of ornament. The commission for this commode offered by Mallett
fell in the midst of this trend. Designers were deriving inspiration from Italy
as a result of the excavations at Herculaneum after 1738, Pompeii after 1748,
and with the engravings of Roman designs by Giovanni Piranesi after 1748.

Young noble Englishmen returning from their Grand Tour of the Continent
desired to transform their London houses and country seats into temples of
culture and luxury to reflect the classical architecture and ornament they
had studied. This desire for classical proportion, function and design was
extended from architecture to decoration. Mayhew and Ince collaborated
with Adam on a number of commissions including Syon House, Apsley
House, and Derby House, where the furniture and architectural detailing
was co-ordinated to produce a unified interior.

Detail of classical motifs and intricate marquetry on one of a pair of

cabinets attributed to Thomas Chippendale, circa 1770, commissioned
for Panshanger in Hertfordshire, showing a break from his Chinese and
Rococo inspired designs in favour of the neo-classical revival. Illustrated
in The Dictionary of English Furniture by Ralph Edwards, Antique
Collectors’ Club, Volume 1, p. 193.
 THE INFLUENCE OF MAYHEW AND INCE

Neo-classical design spread to Ireland through William Moore of Dublin

who trained with Mayhew and Ince and settled in Dublin around 1782. The
marquetry of a commode by Moore and the one currently offered by Mallett
may be closely related and show a broad understanding of neo-classical
subjects. Characteristics of Moore’s work influenced by Mayhew and Ince are
his use of ribbon tied swags, floral garlands, classical tripod urns, anthemia
and arabesques. Mayhew and Ince’s furniture may be found in important
international collections including the Metropolitan Museum of Art (New
York), The Lady Lever Art Gallery (Liverpool), The Philadelphia Museum of Art,
The Victoria and Albert Museum (London) as well as a large number of historic
National Trust properties throughout the United Kingdom.

Detail from one of a pair of commodes attributed to

William Moore. Irish, circa 1785. Mallett archive.
MALLETT & SON (ANTIQUES) LTD
141 New Bond Street
London W1S 2BS
Telephone: +44 (0) 20 7499 7411
Fax: +44 (0) 20 7495 3179
MALLETT INC
929 Madison Avenue, at 74th Street
New York, NY 10021
Telephone: +1 212 249 8783
Fax: +1 212 249 8784

www.mallettantiques.com